Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

23
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Transcript of Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Page 1: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Trademark and Unfair Comp.

Boston College Law School

January 23, 2008

Trade Dress, Functionality

Page 2: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Trade Dress & Product DesignTrade Dress Product Design

Page 3: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Trade Dress Protection

• Lanham Act § 43(a)– Any person who shall affix, apply, … or use in

connection with any goods or services … a false designation of origin … , and shall cause such goods or services to enter into commerce … shall be liable to a civil action … .

Page 4: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Two Pesos v. Taco Cabana505 U.S. 763 (1992)

Taco Cabana Trade Dress

Page 5: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Two Pesos v. Taco Cabana505 U.S. 763 (1992)

• Findings of the District Court– Taco Cabana has an identifiable trade dress– The trade dress is non-functional– The trade dress is inherently distinctive– The trade dress has not acquired secondary

meaning

Page 6: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Inherently Distinctive?

Page 7: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Inherently Distinctive?

Page 8: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Policy Considerations

Distinctiveness

Generic Descriptive Inherently Distinctive

Low

HighPotential forConfusion

Harm toCompetition

Trade Dress,Trademarks

ProductDesign

Page 9: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Example - Review

Page 10: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Functionality

• Lanham Act § 2(e)(5)– No trademark … shall be refused registration

… unless it --• (e) Consists of a mark which, … (5) comprises any

matter that, as a whole, is functional

Page 11: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

TrafFix v. MDI121 S. Ct. 1255 (2001)

Page 12: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Functionality

• When is something “functional”?– Essential to the use or purpose of the article, or– Affects the cost or quality of the product

• Overall policy consideration– Exclusive use of the feature would put

competitors at a significant non-reputation-related disadvantage

Page 13: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Eco v. Honeywell

Page 14: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Aesthetic Functionality

Page 15: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Au-Tomotive Gold v. VW

Page 16: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Hypos

Page 17: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Hypos

Page 18: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

In re Gibson Guitar Corp.

Page 19: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Functionality - Summary

• When is something “functional”?– Essential to the use or purpose of the article– Affects the cost or quality of the product

• Factors to consider– Existence of utility patent– Statements in advertising– Existence of alternative designs– Cost of manufacturing

Page 20: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Hypothetical

Page 21: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Hypothetical

Page 22: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Patent, Copyright, Trademark

Patent Copyright

TrademarkFunctionality

Doctrine

Useful ArticleDoctrine

ProductDesign

FictionalCharacters

ComputerSoftware

Page 23: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality.

Administrative Details

• Next Assignment– Read III.A & B

• Use in Commerce

• Priority and Concurrent Use