TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8...
Transcript of TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8...
![Page 1: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Infant Mortality:
Juanita Graham MSN RNHealth Services Chief Nurse
Mississippi State Department of Health
A Discussion of Birth Outcomes Across MS& Neighboring Southern States
![Page 2: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda• List leading causes of infant mortality
in Mississippi
• Discuss similarities in trends in neighboring Southern states
• Discuss innovative strategy in Mississippi to reduce VLBW
![Page 3: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Figure 1. Infant Mortality, Mississippi, 1998-2007
02468
1012141618
Rat
e pe
r 1,0
00
Total White Nonw hite
Total 10.2 10.2 10.6 10.5 10.3 10.7 9.7 11.4 10.5 10.1
White 6.4 6.7 6.7 6.9 6.8 6.8 6.1 6.6 6.9 6.6
Nonw hite 14.5 14.1 15.1 14.7 14.4 15.4 14.2 17.0 14.4 14.1
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
![Page 4: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
IMR by County 1998-2007(10 Year Average)
Infant mortality rates vary throughout the state.
•10-year average 10.4
•Lowest: Perry 5.6
•Highest: Tunica 20.5
•Healthy People 2010 Goal 4.5
Produced 11/2/2008
Source: MSDH, Public Health StatisticsForrest 10.7
Attala 9.9
Tallahatchie 11.0
Sharkey 5.6
DeSoto 7.8
Marshall 11.0
Benton 12.0
Tippah 7.9
Alcorn 7.3
Prentiss 9.8
Tishomingo
6.8
Tate 10.1
Lafayette 9.7
Panola 10.4
Union 8.9
Pontotoc 5.9
Tunica 20.5
Itawamba 10.1
Monroe 9.8
Coahoma 16.5
Quitman 11.9
Yalobusha 9.1
Calhoun 9.4
Chickasaw 10.9
Bolivar 12.3
Sunflower 15.5 Leflore
13.3
Grenada 13.1
Carroll 10.6
Webster 7.8
Montgom
ery 16.4
Holmes 13.2
Yazoo 10.9
Leake 11.2
Neshoba 10.0
Winston 10.2
Choctaw 11.7
Oktibbeha 8.0
Noxubee 20.1
Kemper 13.3
Lowndes 10.5
Wayne 10.4
Hum
phreys 15.2
Scott 12.9
Newton 10.8
Smith 10.6 Jasper
12.1 Clarke 7.2
Jones 9.6
Greene 6.5 Perry
5.6
George 10.4 Stone
9.9 Pearl River 6.7
Hancock 7.2
Simpson 12.5
Covington 12.2
Lamar 7.9
Marion 8.5 Walthall
9.4 Pike 7.0
Amite 8.4
Wilkinson 6.4
Adams 11.9
Franklin 8.7
Jefferson 11.4
Lincoln 8.7
Copiah 13.6
Lawrence 9.8
Claiborne 13.6
Warren 9.4
Issaquena 5.0
Lee 10.9
Washington 12.1
Hinds 13.5
Madison 10.0
Rankin 7.7
Lauderdale 12.4
Harrison 9.5
Jackson 7.6
Clay 13.1
Jefferson D
avis 10.9
5.00-9.40
9.41-11.20
11.21+
State Avg~/= State Avg< State Avg
![Page 5: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
White & Non-white rates
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Total 10.2 10.2 10.6 10.5 10.3
White 6.4 6.7 6.7 6.9 6.8
Nonwhite 14.5 14.1 15.1 14.7 14.4
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007Total 10.7 9.7 11.4 10.5 10.1
White 6.8 6.1 6.6 6.9 6.6
Nonwhite 15.4 14.2 17.0 14.4 14.1
![Page 6: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
58%
42%
Neonatal
Postneonatal
Infant Mortality by period of death, Mississippi 2007
![Page 7: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Figure 3. Neonatal Mortality, Mississippi, 1998-2007
02468
1012141618
Rat
e pe
r 1,0
00
Total White Nonw hite
Total 6.2 6.2 6.6 6.6 6.8 5.8 6.0 6.7 6.5 5.8
White 3.3 4.0 3.9 4.2 4.4 3.4 3.5 3.0 4.2 3.8
Nonw hite 9.5 8.8 9.6 9.3 9.6 8.7 9.0 11.0 9.1 8.2
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
![Page 8: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Figure 4. Postneonatal Mortality, Mississippi, 1998-2007
02468
1012141618
Rat
e pe
r 1,0
00
Total White Nonw hite
Total 4.0 3.9 4.1 3.9 3.5 4.9 3.8 4.7 4.0 4.2
White 3.0 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.4 3.5 2.6 3.6 2.7 2.8
Nonw hite 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.4 4.9 6.6 5.1 6.0 5.4 5.9
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
![Page 9: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Infant death by infant weight
VLBW53%
LBW16%
Normal31%
Percent of infant deaths by birth weight, Mississippi, 2007
51.2%
14.9%
29.6%
4.3%
VLBW
LBW
Normal
Unknow n
![Page 10: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Figure 13. Average Percent of Infant Deaths by birth weights, Mississippi, 1998-2007
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Per
cent
< 1,500 g 1,500-2,499 g 2,500+ g Unknow n
< 1,500 g 50% 54% 52% 54% 57% 51% 55% 54% 54% 51%
1,500-2,499 g 16% 12% 14% 17% 15% 16% 15% 18% 15% 15%
2,500+ g 33% 31% 32% 27% 26% 32% 28% 28% 29% 30%
Unknow n 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 4%
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
![Page 11: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Figure 8. Infant mortality rate by infant weight
0255075
100125150175200225250275300
Rat
e pe
r 1,0
00
VLBW LBW Normal Total
VLBW 254.7 254.9 251.3 273.2 264.2 238.8 241.6 261.1 241.0 231.9
LBW 19.5 15.4 18.0 21.2 17.2 19.0 15.4 21.0 15.6 15.0
Normal 3.7 3.6 3.8 3.2 3.0 3.8 3.1 3.6 3.4 3.4
Total 10.2 10.2 10.6 10.5 10.3 10.7 9.7 11.4 10.5 10.1
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
![Page 12: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Figure 9. Infant mortality by gestational age
0
10
20
30
40
50
Rat
e pe
r 1,0
00
<37 w eeks 37+ w eeks
<37 w eeks 36.6 37.6 38.1 38.3 38.6 33.5 33.7 34.9 33.8 32.4
37+ w eeks 4.0 3.8 4.0 3.4 3.0 4.6 3.3 4.1 3.6 3.4
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
![Page 13: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Figure 10. Infant mortality by mother's age (in years)
0
5
10
15
20
Rat
e pe
r 1,0
00
<17 18-24 25-34 35+
<17 13.6 17.6 13.3 14.2 14.7 14.8 12.2 19.2 17.7 13.5
18-24 11.2 10.2 12.1 11.0 12.2 12.0 10.3 12.6 11.5 10.4
25-34 8.0 8.0 8.2 8.6 7.4 8.6 8.9 9.1 8.3 8.2
35+ 10.7 11.5 10.4 12.2 8.3 11.1 7.5 9.9 8.6 12.9
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
![Page 14: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Average Percent of Infant Deaths by birth weights, Mississippi, 1998-2007
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Per
cent
< 1,500 g 1,500-2,499 g 2,500+ g Unknow n
< 1,500 g 50% 54% 52% 54% 57% 51% 55% 54% 54% 51%
1,500-2,499 g 16% 12% 14% 17% 15% 16% 15% 18% 15% 15%
2,500+ g 33% 31% 32% 27% 26% 32% 28% 28% 29% 30%
Unknow n 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 4%
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
![Page 15: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Figure 5. Comparison among SIDS rate and neonatal and postneonatal rates, Mississippi, 1996-2007
0
2
4
6
8
Rat
e pe
r 1,0
00
Neonatal Postneonatal SIDS
Neonatal 6.2 6.2 6.6 6.6 6.8 5.8 6.0 6.7 6.5 5.8
Postneonatal 4.0 3.9 4.1 3.9 3.5 4.9 3.8 4.7 4.0 4.2
SIDS 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 2.2 1.6 2.2 1.5 1.2
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
![Page 16: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Figure 6. SIDS rate by race, Mississippi, 1998-2007
0
2
4
6
8
Rat
e pe
r 1,0
00
Total White Nonw hite
Total 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 2.2 1.6 2.2 1.5 1.2
White 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.5 1.4 2.0 1.1 1.1
Nonw hite 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.3 1.5 3.2 2.0 2.3 1.9 1.4
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
![Page 17: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
• Retrospective cohort study using linked birth & death certificate files for Mississippi infants, 1996-2003 (N=341,780).
• A population of (n=297,418) non-Hispanic white & black singleton live-born infants studied
• Assessing relationship between chronic conditions and IM, LBW, PTB
Findings from Linked Data
![Page 18: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Live BirthsPreterm Births
Low Birth Weights Infant Deaths
(n = 295,701) (n = 45,695) (n = 25,464) (n = 2,207)Characteristica n (% ) n (% ) n (% ) n (% )Maternal Characteristics:Race
Black/Non-Hispanic 141,426 (47.8) 27,423 (60.0) 16,526 (64.9) 1,406 (63.7)White/Non-Hispanic 154,275 (52.2) 18,272 (40.0) 8,938 (35.1) 801 (36.3)
Age Group (yrs)11-17 22,995 (7.8) 4,609 (10.1) 2,698 (10.6) 247 (11.2)18-24 136,765 (46.2) 21,306 (46.6) 12,564 (49.3) 1,128 (51.1)25-34 115,541 (39.1) 16,262 (35.6) 8,239 (32.4) 691 (31.3)35+ 20,400 (6.9) 3,518 (7.7) 1,963 (7.7) 141 (6.4)
Education levelLess than High School 77,104 (26.1) 13,917 (30.5) 8,500 (33.4) 789 (35.8)High School 97,210 (32.9) 15,517 (34.0) 8,778 (34.5) 777 (35.2)College 121,387 (41.0) 16,261 (35.6) 8,186 (32.2) 641 (29.0)
Marital StatusNot Married 140,848 (47.6) 26,007 (56.9) 15,759 (61.9) 1,376 (62.4)Married 154,853 (52.4) 19,688 (43.1) 9,705 (38.1) 831 (37.6)
Table 1. Live Births, Preterm Births, Low Birth Weights and Infant Deaths Among Infants by Selected Characteristics: Mississippi, 1996-2003 Birth Cohort
![Page 19: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Live BirthsPreterm Births
Low Birth Weights Infant Deaths
(n = 295,701) (n = 45,695) (n = 25,464) (n = 2,207)Characteristica n (% ) n (% ) n (% ) n (% )Initiation of Prenatal Care
1st Trimester 241,065 (81.5) 34,710 (76.0) 19,699 (77.4) 1,638 (74.2)2nd Trimester 44,507 (15.0) 8,566 (18.8) 4,423 (17.4) 426 (19.3)3rd Trimester 7,341 (2.5) 1,405 (3.1) 675 (2.6) 59 (2.7)No care 2,788 (0.9) 1,014 (2.2) 667 (2.6) 84 (3.8)
Tobacco use10+ cigarettes/day 24,146 (8.2) 3,626 (7.9) 2,950 (11.6) 257 (11.6)1-9 cigarettes/day 12,934 (4.4) 2,067 (4.5) 1,517 (6.0) 128 (5.8)None 258,621 (87.5) 40,002 (87.5) 20,997 (82.5) 1,822 (82.6)
Previous Small Infant 3,688 (1.2) 1,473 (3.2) 1,130 (4.4) 89 (4.0)Maternal Medical Conditions:Diabetes 7,319 (2.5) 1,429 (3.1) 631 (2.5) 73 (3.3)Hydramnios/Oligohydramnios 3,180 (1.1) 871 (1.9) 798 (3.1) 109 (4.9)Hypertension 19,950 (6.8) 5,446 (11.9) 4,220 (16.6) 187 (8.5)Infant Characteristics:b
Birth WeightLBW: < 2,500 grams 25,464 (8.6) 16,012 (35.0) 25,464 (100.0) 1,213 (55.0)Normal: ≥ 2,500 grams 270,237 (91.4) 29,683 (65.0) n/a 994 (45.0)
Gestational AgePTB: < 37 weeks 45,695 (15.4) 45,695 (100.0) 16,012 (62.9) 1,194 (54.1)Term: ≥ 37 weeks 250,006 (84.6) n/a 9,452 (37.1) 1,013 (45.9)
![Page 20: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
PTB LBW Infant Dieda
Characteristic OR (95% CI)b OR (95% CI)b OR (95% CI)b
Maternal Characteristics:Race
Black/Non-Hispanic 1.6 (1.5-1.6) 2.1 (2.0-2.1) 1.7 (1.6-1.9)White/Non-Hispanic 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent)
Age Group (yrs)11-17 1.1 (1.0-1.2) 1.2 (1.2-1.3) 1.2 (1.0-1.4)18-24 1.0 (0.9-1.0) 1.1 (1.0-1.1) 1.1 (1.0-1.2)25-34 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent)35+ 1.2 (1.2-1.3) 1.3 (1.2-1.4) 1.1 (0.9-1.3)
Education levelLess than High School 1.2 (1.1-1.2) 1.2 (1.2-1.2) 1.4 (1.2-1.6)High School 1.1 (1.1-1.1) 1.1 (1.1-1.1) 1.2 (1.1-1.4)College 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent)
Table 3. Adjusted Odds Ratios for Preterm Birth (PTB), Low Birth Weight (LBW) and Infant Death Among Infants by Selected Factors: Mississippi, 1996-2003 Birth Cohort
![Page 21: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
PTB LBW Infant Dieda
Characteristic OR (95% CI)b OR (95% CI)b OR (95% CI)b
Marital StatusNot Married 1.1 (1.1-1.2) 1.2 (1.2-1.2) 1.1 (1.0-1.3)Married 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent)
Maternal Risk Factors:Initiation of Prenatal Care
1st Trimester 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent)2nd Trimester 1.2 (1.2-1.2) 0.9 (0.9-1.0) 1.1 (1.0-1.2)3rd Trimester 1.1 (1.1-1.2) 0.8 (0.7-0.9) 0.9 (0.7-1.1)No care 2.7 (2.5-2.9) 2.4 (2.2-2.7) 3.1 (2.5-3.9)
Tobacco use10+ cigarettes/day 1.1 (1.1-1.2) 2.1 (2.0-2.2) 1.8 (1.5-2.0)1-9 cigarettes/day 1.1 (1.0-1.1) 1.7 (1.6-1.8) 1.4 (1.2-1.7)None 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (referent)
Previous Small Infant 3.5 (3.3-3.8) 4.6 (4.3-5.0) 3.0 (2.4-3.7)Maternal Medical Conditions:Diabetes 1.2 (1.1-1.3) 0.8 (0.7-0.9) 1.4 (1.1-1.7)Hydramnios/Oligohydramnios 1.8 (1.7-2.0) 3.1 (2.8-3.4) 4.4 (3.6-5.3)Hypertension 2.1 (2.0-2.2) 3.2 (3.1-3.4) 1.2 (1.0-1.4)
![Page 22: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• Evaluates prenatal care based on timing & number of visits
• Adequate prenatal care had lower infant mortality rate than inadequate group
• “Adequate plus” prenatal care had much higher infant mortality rate than adequate group (what does this tell us?)
• Mississippi boasts of nearly 85% rate of early entry into care
Kotelchuck Index
![Page 23: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Figure 11. Infant mortality rate by Kotelchuck Index
0
5
10
15
20
Rat
e pe
r 1,0
00
Inadequate Intermediate Adequate Adequate Plus
Inadequate 14.2 14.6 15.6 13.9 12.3 16.8 12.9 16.4 15.9 13.5
Intermediate 8.3 8.3 7.3 6.4 9.3 7.2 7.4 11.3 7.4 9.7
Adequate 6.1 5.9 5.0 5.2 5.3 5.5 4.9 5.4 5.0 4.7
Adequate Plus 12.9 11.8 14.3 14.6 12.6 13.1 12.5 13.3 13.0 12.1
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
![Page 24: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Southern States Data
• CDC State Profiles Data (mixture 2005 & 2006 data)– Available online at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/data/2009_state_profiles.htm
![Page 25: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
AL AR FL GA KY LA MS NC SC TN US
Teen Birth Rate % Births to Unmarried Mothers Cesarean Delivery Rate Early Prenatal Care
![Page 26: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Preterm Birth Rate Low Birthweight Rate Infant Mortality Rate
Preterm Birth Rate 17.1 13.7 13.8 14.1 15.1 16.2 18.8 13.6 15.4 14.8 12.8
Low Birthweight Rate 10.5 9.2 8.7 9.6 9.1 11.3 12.4 9.1 10.1 9.6 8.3
Infant Mortality Rate 6.83 8.29 7.24 8.35 6.79 9.79 10.74 8.58 9.03 8.87 6.83
AL AR FL GA KY LA MS NC SC TN US
![Page 27: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
AL AR FL GA KY LA MS NC SC TN US
Heart Disease Cancer Diabetes Stroke Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease
![Page 28: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
AL AR FL GA KY LA MS NC SC TN US
Accidents Alzheimer's Disease Influenza & Pneumonia Kidney Disease Septicemia
![Page 29: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Percentage of Persons < 65 years old without Health Insurance
AL 23.70% LA 18.90%
AR 21.40% MS 18.80%
FL 20.80% NC 17.50%
GA 19.80% SC 16.60%
KY 19.40% TN 16.50%
US 14.80%
![Page 30: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
• Post-Katrina assessment of access to reproductive health care
• SIDS Knowledge among AA women• Evaluation of CHW use among high risk
populations• MS Coroner Survey
Other MS IM Studies
![Page 31: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Problem: Many Mississippi babies die very small & very young despite prenatal care
Hypothesis: Mississippi women are not healthy enough to achieve a full term, normal weight delivery
Solution: Intervention PRIOR to conception
Method: IPC for small population with highest risk for poor delivery outcomes
Need for IPC
![Page 32: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
• Improve knowledge, attitudes, behaviors of men & women related to preconception health
• Assure all women of childbearing age in the U.S. receive preconception care services (i.e., evidence-based risk screening, health promotion, and interventions) enabling entry to pregnancy in optimal health
• Reduce risks indicated by previous adverse pregnancy outcome through interventions during the interconception period, to prevent or minimize health problems for a mother and her future children
• Reduce the disparities in adverse pregnancy outcomes
CDC Recommendations for IPC
![Page 33: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
•Preconception / interconception care pilot programs
•Rural vs. Urban communities
•Delta Infant Mortality Elimination
•Metro Infant Mortality Elimination
MIME & DIME
![Page 34: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Partnering organizations• UMMC – principal recruitment site & service provider.
• Healthy Linkages – referral service for identification of medical homes.
• Division of Medicaid – data source.
• World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Reproductive Health (WHO/CC/RH) – technical assistance.
• Community health centers – primary care medical homes.
MIME & DIME
![Page 35: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
IPC intervention package• Individualized interpregnancy care plan based on
assessments of medical/ social risks for subsequent poor pregnancy outcomes;
• Provision of primary health care & dental services in accordance with care plan for 24 months;
• Assistance in achieving a woman’s desire for subsequent pregnancies & need for optimum child spacing (ideally 18-20 months);
• Provision of appropriate social services & community outreach in each woman’s community.
MIME & DIME
![Page 36: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Problems & solutions• Expansive & rural geographical area• Limited funding• Limited resources• Communication• Transportation
MIME & DIME
![Page 37: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Role of Health Department• Lead agency & grant applicant
• Oversight & primary leadership for the project
• Contractual & logistical arrangements
• Local level support services:
– Case management & outreach
• Data analysis & evaluation
• Policy development
MIME / DIME
![Page 38: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Project evaluation• On-going surveillance combined with evaluation at
the project’s end
• Acceptability and delivery of the IPC service package indicators followed on an on-going basis
• Health & Reproductive outcomes evaluated at project’s end
• Cost-benefit analysis to compare cost savings to costs of program
MIME / DIME
![Page 39: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Goal for policy change• Medicaid lost 6 weeks post-partum
• No primary care during interim before subsequent pregnancies so poor chronic disease management
• Goal: Primary care for poverty-level Mississippi women who deliver VLBW
• Format: Medicaid waiver
MIME / DIME
![Page 40: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Strategies to effect policy change• Cost analysis
– Reduction in Medicaid costs• >60 % of Mississippi births covered by Medicaid
– High risk pregnancy care
– High risk infant care
– Long term morbidities & developmental delay
– Low number of qualified women (n= ~800)
– Low cost of primary care
MIME / DIME
![Page 41: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Women not prepared for pregnancy & motherhood
Classic Public HealthDoing a lot with a littleKeeping families healthy
Conclusions
![Page 42: TPHA IM Prez...Lafayette 9.7 Panola 10.4 Union 8.9 Pontotoc 5.9 Tunica 20.5 Itawamba 10.1 Monroe 9.8 Coahoma 16.5 Quitman 11.9 Yalobusha 9.1 Calhoun 9.4 Chickasaw 10.9 Bolivar 12.3](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070806/5f05038c7e708231d410d4c6/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Questions?