Town of Grimsby Development Charge Background Study · 2018. 11. 5. · Watson & Associates...
Transcript of Town of Grimsby Development Charge Background Study · 2018. 11. 5. · Watson & Associates...
Town of Grimsby Development Charge
Background Study
September 1, 2016
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Contents
Page
Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... i
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose of this Document ....................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Summary of the Process ......................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Changes to the Development Charges Act: Bill 73 ................................ 1-2
1.3.1 Area Rating .................................................................................. 1-2 1.3.2 Asset Management Plan for New Infrastructure ........................... 1-3 1.3.3 60-Day Circulation of D.C. Background Study ............................. 1-3
1.3.4 Timing of Collection of Development Charges ............................. 1-3 1.3.5 Other Changes ............................................................................. 1-4
2. Current Policies in the Town of Grimsby ........................................................... 2-1
2.1 Schedule of Charges .............................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Services Covered ................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Timing of D.C. Calculation and Payment ................................................ 2-2
2.4 Indexing .................................................................................................. 2-2 2.5 Redevelopment Allowance ..................................................................... 2-2
2.6 Exemptions ............................................................................................. 2-3
3. Anticipated Development in the Town of Grimsby ............................................. 3-1 3.1 Requirements of the Act ......................................................................... 3-1
3.2 Basis of Population, Household and Non-Residential Gross Floor Area Forecast ......................................................................................... 3-1
3.3 Summary of Growth Forecast ................................................................. 3-1
4. The Approach to Calculating the Charge ........................................................... 4-1
4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Services Potentially Involved .................................................................. 4-1
4.3 Increase in the Need for Service ............................................................. 4-1 4.4 Local Service Policy ................................................................................ 4-1 4.5 Capital Forecast ...................................................................................... 4-6 4.6 Treatment of Credits ............................................................................... 4-7 4.7 Eligible Debt and Committed Excess Capacity ....................................... 4-7
4.8 Existing Reserve Funds .......................................................................... 4-8 4.9 Deductions .............................................................................................. 4-9
4.9.1 Reduction Required by Level of Service Ceiling – Non-prescribed services ...................................................................... 4-9
4.9.2 Reduction Required by Level of Service Ceiling – Prescribed services ...................................................................................... 4-10
4.9.3 Reduction for Uncommitted Excess Capacity ............................ 4-10
4.9.4 Reduction for Benefit to Existing Development .......................... 4-10 4.9.5 Reduction for Anticipated Grants, Subsidies and Other
Contributions .............................................................................. 4-11
4.9.6 The 10% Reduction .................................................................... 4-11 4.10 Municipal-Wide vs. Area Rating ............................................................ 4-12
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
4.11 Allocation of Development .................................................................... 4-12
5. Development Charge Eligible Cost Analysis by Service .................................... 5-1 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Service Levels and 10-Year Capital Costs for D.C. Calculation .............. 5-1
5.2.1 Administration .............................................................................. 5-1
5.2.2 Indoor and Outdoor Recreation Services ..................................... 5-4 5.2.3 Library Services ........................................................................... 5-6 5.2.4 Parking Services .......................................................................... 5-9 5.2.5 Services Related to a Highway .................................................. 5-11 5.2.6 Fire Protection Services ............................................................. 5-16
5.3 Service Levels and Urban Buildout Capital Costs for Grimsby’s D.C. Calculation .................................................................................... 5-21 5.3.1 Stormwater Drainage and Control Services ............................... 5-21
5.3.2 Wastewater Services ................................................................. 5-21 5.3.3 Water Services ........................................................................... 5-22
6. Development Charge Calculation ...................................................................... 6-1
7. Development Charge Policy Recommendations and Development Charge By-law Rules...................................................................................................... 7-1
7.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 7-1 7.2 Development Charge By-law Structure ................................................... 7-1 7.3 Development Charge By-law Rules ........................................................ 7-3
7.3.1 Payment in any Particular Case ................................................... 7-3 7.3.2 Determination of the Amount of the Charge ................................. 7-4
7.3.3 Application to Redevelopment of Land (Demolition and Conversion) .................................................................................. 7-4
7.3.4 Exemptions (full or partial) ........................................................... 7-5 7.3.5 Phasing in .................................................................................... 7-5
7.3.6 Timing of Collection ...................................................................... 7-5 7.3.7 Indexing ....................................................................................... 7-6
7.4 Other Development Charge By-law Provisions ....................................... 7-6
7.4.1 Categories of Services for Reserve Fund and Credit Purposes ...................................................................................... 7-6
7.4.2 By-law In-force Date ..................................................................... 7-6 7.4.3 Minimum Interest Rate Paid on Refunds and Charged for
Inter-Reserve Fund Borrowing ..................................................... 7-7 7.5 Other Recommendations ........................................................................ 7-7
8. By-law Implementation ...................................................................................... 8-1
8.1 Public Consultation Process ................................................................... 8-1 8.1.1 Introduction .................................................................................. 8-1 8.1.2 Public Meeting of Council ............................................................. 8-1 8.1.3 Other Consultation Activity ........................................................... 8-1
8.2 Anticipated Impact of the Charge on Development ................................. 8-2 8.3 Implementation Requirements ................................................................ 8-2
8.3.1 Introduction .................................................................................. 8-2
8.3.2 Notice of Passage ........................................................................ 8-3 8.3.3 By-law Pamphlet .......................................................................... 8-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
8.3.4 Appeals ........................................................................................ 8-4
8.3.5 Complaints ................................................................................... 8-4 8.3.6 Credits .......................................................................................... 8-4 8.3.7 Front-Ending Agreements ............................................................ 8-5 8.3.8 Severance and Subdivision Agreement Conditions ..................... 8-5
Appendix A – Background Information on Residential and Non-residential Growth Forecast ............................................................................................................A-1
Appendix B – Level of Service .....................................................................................B-1
Appendix C – Long Term Capital and Operating Cost Examination ............................ C-1
Appendix D – Development Charge Reserve Fund Policy .......................................... D-1
Appendix E – Local Service Policy ...............................................................................E-1
Appendix F – Asset Management Plan ........................................................................ F-1
Appendix G – Proposed Development Charge By-law ................................................ G-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
Acronym Description
A.M.P. Asset Management Plan
D.C. Development Charge
D.C.A. Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended
E.S.A. Environmentally Sensitive Area
F.I.R. Financial Information Return
G.F.A. Gross floor area
M.T.O. Ministry of Transportation of Ontario
N.A.I.C.S. North American Classification System
O.M.B. Ontario Municipal Board
O.Reg. Ontario Regulation
P.O.A. Provincial Offences Act
P.P.U. Persons per unit
Q.E.W. Queen Elizabeth Way
R.O.W. Right of way
S.P.S. Sewage Pumping Station
sq.ft. Square footage
s.s. Subsection
Page (i)
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Executive Summary
1. The report provided herein represents the Development Charge Background
Study for the Town of Grimsby required by the Development Charges Act, 1997
(D.C.A.), as amended. This report has been prepared in accordance with the
methodology required under the D.C.A. The contents include the following:
Chapter 1 – Overview of the legislative requirements of the Act;
Chapter 2 – Review of present D.C. policies of the Town;
Chapter 3 – Summary of the residential and non-residential growth
forecasts for the Town;
Chapter 4 – Approach to calculating the development charge;
Chapter 5 – Review of historical service standards and identification of
future capital requirements to service growth and related deductions and
allocations;
Chapter 6 – Calculation of the development charges;
Chapter 7 – Development charge policy recommendations and rules; and
Chapter 8 – By-law implementation.
2. Development Charges (D.C.) provide for the recovery of growth-related capital
expenditures from new development. The D.C.A. is the statutory basis to
recover these charges. The methodology is detailed in Chapter 4; a simplified
summary is provided below:
1) Identify amount, type and location of growth;
2) Identify servicing needs to accommodate growth;
3) Identify capital costs to provide services to meet the needs;
4) Deduct:
Grants, subsidies and other contributions;
Benefit to existing development;
Statutory 10% deduction (soft services);
Amounts in excess of 10-year historical service calculation;
D.C. reserve funds (where applicable);
5) Net costs are then allocated between residential and non-residential
benefit; and
Page (ii)
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
6) Net costs divided by growth to provide the D.C. charge.
3. The growth forecast (Chapter 3) on which the D.C. is based, projects the
following population, housing and non-residential floor area for the 10-year
(2016-2025), and urban buildout periods (2016-urban buildout) for purposes of
calculating the municipal-wide D.C.s.
4. On August 18, 2014, the Town of Grimsby passed By-law 14-84 under the
D.C.A. The by-law imposes the D.C. on residential and non-residential uses.
The Town is undertaking a D.C. public process and anticipates passing a new
by-law on November 7, 2016. The mandatory public meeting is scheduled for
October 17, 2016 after legislative notice is provided in accordance with the
D.C.A.
5. The Town’s municipal-wide D.C. currently has a single detached dwelling charge
of $13,981 and non-residential charge of $5.65 per square foot for fully serviced
properties. This report has undertaken an updated calculation of the charge
(presented in Schedule ES-1 for residential and non-residential) based on future
identified needs. The proposed calculated municipal-wide single-detached unit
charge is $16,859. The calculated municipal-wide non-residential charge is now
calculated on an industrial vs. non-industrial basis. The corresponding industrial
development charge is $3.32 per square foot and the non-industrial development
charge is $7.44 per square foot. These rates are submitted to Council for its
consideration.
6. The D.C.A. requires a summary be provided of the gross capital costs and the
net costs to be recovered over the life of the by-law. This calculation is provided
by service and is presented in Table 6-4. A summary of these costs is provided
below:
10 Year Urban Buildout
2016-20252016-Urban
Buildout
(Net) Population Increase 3,920 3,779
Residential Unit Increase 2,282 2,228
Non-Residential Gross Floor Area Increase (ft²) 623,213 609,108
Source: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. Forecast 2016
Measure
Page (iii)
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Hence, $19.79 million (or an average annual amount of $3.96 million) will need to
be contributed from taxes and rates, or other sources. Of this amount, $83,000
will be included in subsequent D.C. study updates to reflect the portion of capital
that benefits growth in the post period D.C. forecasts and the amounts that will
be included over time as the service standards adjust.
Based on the above table, the Town plans to spend $48.14 million over the next
five years, of which $28.36 million (59%) is recoverable from D.C.s. Of this net
amount, $23.92 million is recoverable from residential development and $4.44
million from non-residential development. It is noted also that any exemptions or
reductions in the charges would reduce this recovery further.
7. Considerations by Council – The background study represents the service needs
arising from residential and non-residential growth over the forecast periods, as
summarized in Chapter 3.
The following services are calculated based on the urban buildout (2016-urban
buildout) growth forecast:
Stormwater Drainage and Control Services;
Wastewater Services; and
Water Services.
All other services are calculated based on a 10-year (2016-2025) forecast.
These include:
Services Related to a Highway;
Fire Protection Services;
Other Transportation Services;
Indoor and Outdoor Recreation Services;
Library Services; and
Administration Studies.
Total gross expenditures planned over the next five years 48,144,146$
Less:
Benefit to existing development 9,015,460$
Post planning period benefit 83,413$
Ineligible re: Level of Service 7,088,450$
Mandatory 10% deduction for certain services 900,790$
Grants, subsidies and other contributions 2,700,000$
Net Costs to be recovered from development charges 28,356,033$
Page (iv)
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Council will consider the findings and recommendations provided in the report
and, in conjunction with public input, approve such policies and rates it deems
appropriate. These directions will refine the draft D.C. by-law which is appended
in Appendix G. These decisions may include:
adopting the charges and policies recommended herein;
considering additional exemptions to the by-law; and
considering reductions in the charge by class of development (obtained by
removing certain services on which the charge is based and/or by a
general reduction in the charge).
Page (v)
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
TABLE ES-1
SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
Single and Semi-
Detached Dwelling
Apartments - 2
Bedrooms +
Apartments -
Bachelor and 1
Bedroom
Other Multiples
Industrial
(per ft² of Gross
Floor Area)
Non-Industrial
(per ft² of Gross
Floor Area)
Municipal Wide Services:
Services Related to a Highway and Related Infrastructure 9,358 5,568 3,702 6,308 2.46 5.49
Parking Services 37 22 15 25 0.01 0.02
Fire Protection Services 782 465 309 527 0.20 0.46
Indoor and Outdoor Recreation Services 4,831 2,874 1,911 3,256 0.28 0.63
Library Services 771 459 305 520 0.04 0.10
Administration 197 117 78 133 0.05 0.12
Total Municipal Wide Services 15,976 9,505 6,320 10,769 3.04 6.82
Urban Services
Stormwater Drainage and Control Services 320 190 127 216 0.16 0.36
Wastewater Services - - - - - -
Water Services 563 335 223 379 0.12 0.26
Total Urban Services 883 525 350 595 0.28 0.62
GRAND TOTAL RURAL AREA 15,976 9,505 6,320 10,769 3.04 6.82
GRAND TOTAL URBAN AREA 16,859 10,030 6,670 11,364 3.32 7.44
Service
RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL
Page 1-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose of this Document
This background study has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of the
Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended, (D.C.A.) (s.10) and, accordingly,
recommends new development charges (D.C.) and policies for the Town of Grimsby.
The Town retained Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. (Watson), to undertake the
D.C. study process in May, 2016. Watson worked with Town staff in preparing the D.C.
analysis and policy recommendations.
This D.C. background study, containing the proposed D.C. by-law, will be distributed to
members of the public in order to provide interested parties with sufficient background
information on the legislation, the study’s recommendations and an outline of the basis
for these recommendations.
This report has been prepared, in the first instance, to meet the statutory requirements
applicable to the Town’s D.C. background study, as summarized in Chapter 4. It also
addresses the requirement for “rules” (contained in Chapter 7) and the proposed by-law
to be made available as part of the approval process (included as Appendix G).
In addition, the report is designed to set out sufficient background on the legislation
(Chapter 4), Grimsby’s current D.C. policy (Chapter 2) and the policies underlying the
proposed by-law, to make the exercise understandable to those who are involved.
Finally, it addresses post-adoption implementation requirements (Chapter 8) which are
critical to the successful application of the new policy.
The Chapters in the report are supported by Appendices containing the data required to
explain and substantiate the calculation of the charge. A full discussion of the statutory
requirements for the preparation of a background study and calculation of a
development charge is provided herein.
1.2 Summary of the Process
The public meeting required under Section 12 of the D.C.A. is scheduled for October
17, 2016 in accordance with the Act. Its purpose is to present the study to the public
and to solicit public input. The meeting is also being held to answer any questions
regarding the study’s purpose, methodology and the proposed modifications to the
Town’s D.C.
Page 1-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
To date, the following process has taken place:
Data collection, staff review, engineering work, D.C. calculations and policy work
(May-August, 2016); and
Background study and draft D.C. by-law released to the public September 1,
2016 (to meet the requirement of the D.C.A., as amended which requires release
of the background report at least 60 days prior to by-law passage).
The process to be followed in finalizing the report and recommendations include:
Public meeting advertisement placed in newspaper(s) in accordance with the
requirements of the D.C.A. (September 1, 2016);
Public meeting of Council (October 17 2016);
Consideration of responses received prior to, at, or immediately following the
Public Meeting;
Council considers adoption of the background study and passage of the D.C. by-
law (November 7, 2016);
Notice in the newspaper (s) given of by-law passage within 20 days of passage;
Last day for by-law appeal is 40 days after by-law passage; and
Town makes pamphlet available (where by-law is not appealed) within 60 days
after the by-law comes into force.
1.3 Changes to the Development Charges Act: Bill 73
With the amendment of the D.C.A. (as a result of Bill 73 and O.Reg. 428/15), there are
a number of areas that must be addressed to ensure that the Town is in compliance
with the D.C.A., as amended. The following provides an explanation of the changes to
the Act that affect the Town’s Background Study and how they have been dealt with to
ensure compliance with the amended legislation.
1.3.1 Area Rating
Bill 73 has introduced two new sections where Council must consider the use of area
specific charges:
1) Section 2(9) of the Act now requires a municipality to implement area-specific
D.C.s for either specific services which are prescribed and/or for specific
municipalities which are to be regulated. (Note that at this time, no municipalities
or services are prescribed by the Regulations.)
Page 1-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
2) Section 10(2)c.1 of the D.C.A. requires that, “the development charges
background study shall include consideration of the use of more than one
development charge by-law to reflect different needs for services in different
areas.”
In regard to the first item, there are no services or specific municipalities identified in the
regulations which must be area rated. The second item requires Council to consider the
use of area rating.
1.3.2 Asset Management Plan for New Infrastructure
The new legislation now requires that a D.C. background study must include an Asset
Management Plan (s.10 (2) c.2). The asset management plan must deal with all assets
that are proposed to be funded, in whole or in part, by D.C.s. The current regulations
provide very extensive and specific requirements for the asset management plan
related to transit services; however, they are silent with respect to how the asset
management plan is to be provided for all other services. As part of any asset
management plan, the examination should be consistent with the municipality’s existing
assumptions, approaches and policies on asset management planning. This
examination may include both qualitative and quantitative measures such as examining
the annual future lifecycle contributions needs (discussed further in Appendix F of this
report).
1.3.3 60-Day Circulation of D.C. Background Study
Previously the legislation required that a D.C. background study be made available to
the public at least two weeks prior to the public meeting. The amended legislation now
provides that the D.C. background study must be made available to the public (including
posting on the municipal website) at least 60 days prior to passage of the D.C. by-law.
No other changes were made to timing requirements for such things as notice of the
public meeting and notice of by-law passage.
This D.C. study is being provided to the public on September 1, 2016 to ensure the new
requirements for release of the study is met.
1.3.4 Timing of Collection of Development Charges
The D.C.A. has been refined by Bill 73 to require that D.C.s are collected at the time of
the first building permit. For the majority of development, this will not impact the Town’s
present process. However, there may be instances where several building permits are
to be issued and either the size of the development or the uses will not be definable at
Page 1-4
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
the time of the first building permit. In these instances, the Town may enter into a
delayed payment agreement in order to capture the full development.
1.3.5 Other Changes
It is also noted that a number of other changes were made through Bill 73 and O.Reg.
428/15 including changes to the way in which Transit D.C. service standards are
calculated, the inclusion of Waste Diversion and the ability for collection of additional
levies; however, these sections do not impact the Town’s D.C.
Page 2-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
2. Current Policies in the Town of Grimsby
2.1 Schedule of Charges
On August 18, 2014, the Town of Grimsby passed By-law 14-84 under the D.C.A. This
by-law imposes D.C.s for residential and non-residential uses. The table below
provides the rates currently in effect, as at September 1, 2016.
2.2 Services Covered
The following services are covered under By-law 14-84, as amended:
Municipal-wide Services:
Roads and Related;
Other Transportation Services;
Fire Protection Services;
Outdoor Recreation Services;
Indoor Recreation Services;
Library Services; and
Administration.
Non-Residential
ServiceSingle & Semi
DetachedMultiples
Apartments with
>= 2 Bedrooms
Apartments with
< 2 Bedroomsper ft²
Municipal Wide Services
Roads and Related 5,436 3,507 3,296 2,192 2.80
Other Transportation Services 35 22 21 14 0.02
Fire Protection Services 592 382 359 239 0.31
Outdoor Recreation Services 2,549 1,645 1,546 1,028 0.33
Indoor Recreation Services 1,374 886 833 554 0.17
Library Services 622 401 378 250 0.08
Administration 292 189 178 118 0.15
Total Municipal-Wide Services 10,900 7,033 6,611 4,395 3.87
Urban Services
Stormwater Drainage and Control Services 423 273 256 170 0.64
Wastewater Services 1,632 1,053 990 658 0.69
Water Services 1,096 707 665 442 0.46
Total Urban Services 3,151 2,033 1,912 1,270 1.81
Grand Total Rural Area 10,900 7,033 6,611 4,395 3.87
Grand Total Urban Area 14,051 9,066 8,522 5,666 5.68
TABLE 2-1
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
AS AT SEPTEMBER 1, 2016
Residential
Page 2-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Urban Services:
Stormwater Drainage and Control Services;
Wastewater Services; and
Water Services.
2.3 Timing of D.C. Calculation and Payment
Development charges applicable to residential and non-residential development are
calculated, payable and collected as of the date a building permit is issued.
2.4 Indexing
Rates shall be indexed on September 1st each year, commencing from by-law passage,
in accordance with the Statistics Canada Quarterly, Construction Price Statistics, for the
most recent year-over-year period.
2.5 Redevelopment Allowance
As a result of the redevelopment of land, a building or structure existing on the same
land within 48 months prior to the date of payment of development charges in regard to
such redevelopment was, or is to be demolished, in whole or in part, or converted from
one principal use to another principal use on the same land, in order to facilitate the
redevelopment, the development charges otherwise payable with respect to such
redevelopment shall be reduced by the following amounts:
(a) in the case of a residential building or structure, or in the case of a mixed- use
building or structure, the residential uses in the mixed-use building or structure,
an amount calculated by multiplying the applicable development charge under
subsections 3.6 and 3.7 and of this by-law by the number, according to type, of
dwelling units that have been or will be demolished or converted to another
principal use; and provided that such amounts shall not exceed, in total, the
amount of the development charges otherwise payable with respect to the
redevelopment.
Page 2-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
2.6 Exemptions
The following non-statutory exemptions are provided under By-law 14-84:
Development creating or adding an accessory use or accessory structure not
exceeding 10 square metres of G.F.A.; and
Bona fide farm (non-residential) buildings, including wholesale greenhouse
facilities and structures.
Page 3-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
3. Anticipated Development in the Town of Grimsby
3.1 Requirements of the Act
Chapter 4 provides the methodology for calculating a development charge as per the
D.C.A. Figure 4-1 presents this methodology graphically. It is noted in the first box of
the schematic that in order to determine the D.C. that may be imposed, it is a
requirement of Section 5 (1) of the D.C.A. that “the anticipated amount, type and
location of development, for which D.C.s can be imposed, must be estimated.”
The growth forecast contained in this chapter (with supplemental tables in Appendix A)
provides for the anticipated development for which the Town of Grimsby will be required
to provide services over a 10-year time horizon (i.e. anticipated timing of urban
buildout).
3.2 Basis of Population, Household and Non-Residential Gross
Floor Area Forecast
The D.C. growth forecast has been developed by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd.
In compiling the growth forecast, the following information sources were also consulted
to help assess residential and non-residential development potential for the Town over
the forecast period; including
The Town of Grimsby 2012 Official Plan (approved by the Ontario Municipal
Board, May, 2012);
The Town of Grimsby 2014 Development Charge (D.C.) Study, prepared by
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd.;
2011 Census data;
Historical residential and non-residential building permit activity; and
Discussions with staff regarding potential residential and non-residential
development opportunities for the Town.
3.3 Summary of Growth Forecast
A detailed analysis of the residential and non-residential growth forecasts is provided in
Appendix A. The discussion provided herein summarizes the anticipated growth for the
Town and describes the basis for the forecast. The results of the residential growth
forecast analysis are summarized in Figure 3-1 below, and Schedule 1 in Appendix A.
Page 3-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Figure 3-1 Household Formation-based Population and Household Forecast Model
Page 3-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
As identified in Table 3-1 and Schedule 1, the Town’s population is anticipated to reach
approximately 31,200 by 2026. This represents an increase of approximately 3,920
persons over the 10-year forecast period. The population forecast summarized in
Schedule 1 excludes the net Census undercount, which is estimated at approximately
4%. The Census undercount represents the net number of persons missed during
Census enumeration. In calculating the D.C. for the Town of Grimsby, the net Census
undercount has been excluded from the growth forecast. Accordingly, all references
provided here after to the population forecast exclude the net Census undercount.
Provided below is a summary of the key assumptions and findings regarding the Town
of Grimsby D.C. growth forecast update.
1. Unit Mix (Appendix A – Schedules 1 through 6)
The forecast unit mix for the Town was derived from active development
applications (as per Schedule 5), historical development activity (as per
Schedule 6), and discussions with planning staff regarding anticipated
development trends.
Based on the above, the 10-year (2016-2026) household growth forecast
is comprised of 10% low-density (single detached and semi-detached),
19% medium-density (multiples except apartments) and 71% high-density
(apartments) development.
2. Geographic Location of Residential Development (Appendix A – Schedule 2)
Schedule 2 summarizes the anticipated amount, type and location of
development for the Town of Grimsby by development location. In
accordance with forecast demand and available land supply, housing
growth has been allocated to the following areas over the 2016 to 2026
forecast period:
o Urban – 98%
o Rural – 2%.
Page 3-4
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Table 3-1 Town of Grimsby
Residential Growth Forecast Summary
Singles & Semi-
Detached
Multiple
Dwellings2 Apartments
3 OtherTotal
Households
Person Per
Unit (PPU)
Mid 1996 19,585 20,260 5,520 645 650 10 6,825 2.87
Mid 2001 21,297 22,030 6,095 865 620 5 7,585 2.81
Mid 2006 23,937 24,760 6,525 1,420 765 30 8,740 2.74
Mid 2011 25,325 26,200 7,070 1,645 860 40 9,615 2.63
Mid 2016 27,281 28,220 7,462 2,115 983 40 10,600 2.57
Mid 2021 29,327 30,330 7,580 2,342 1,810 40 11,772 2.49
Mid 2026 (Buildout) 31,201 32,270 7,692 2,557 2,593 40 12,882 2.42
Mid 1996 - Mid 2001 1,712 1,770 575 220 -30 -5 760
Mid 2001 - Mid 2006 2,640 2,730 430 555 145 25 1,155
Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 1,388 1,440 545 225 95 10 875
Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 1,956 2,020 392 470 123 0 985
Mid 2016 - Mid 2021 2,046 2,110 118 227 827 0 1,172
Mid 2016 - Mid 2026 (Buildout) 3,920 4,050 230 442 1,610 0 2,282
Source: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2016.
1. Census Undercount estimated at approximately 4%. Note: Population Including the Undercount has been rounded.
2. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes.
3. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments.
Population
(Excluding
Census
Undercount)
Population
(Including
Census
Undercount)¹
Year
Housing Units
Page 3-5
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
3. Planning Period
Short-term and longer-term time horizons are required for the D.C.
process. The D.C.A. limits the planning horizon for certain services, such
as parks, recreation and libraries, to a 10-year planning horizon. Roads
and fire services utilize a longer planning period.
4. Population in New Units (Appendix A – Schedules 2 through 5)
The number of permanent housing units to be constructed in the Town of
Grimsby during the 10-year forecast period is presented on Figure 3-2.
Over the 10-year forecast period, the Town is anticipated to average 228
new housing units per year.
Population in new units is derived from Schedules 3 and 4, which
incorporate historical development activity, anticipated units (refer to unit
mix discussion) and average persons per unit by dwelling type for new
units.
Schedule 7a summarizes the average number of persons per unit (P.P.U.)
for the new housing units by age and type of dwelling based on a 2011
custom Census data for the Town. Due to data limitations, high density
P.P.U.s were derived from the Niagara Region as outlined in Schedule 7b.
The total calculated P.P.U. for all density types has been adjusted to
account for the downward P.P.U. trend which has been recently
experienced in both new and older units, largely due to the aging of the
population. Adjusted 10-year average P.P.U.s by dwelling type are as
follows:
o Low density: 3.16
o Medium density: 2.13
o High density: 1.59.
Page 3-6
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Figure 3-2
73
209
152
116
185
230
78
290
255
132
232 235 235 235 235
222 222 222 222 222
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Ho
us
ing
Un
its
Years
HOUSING FORECAST¹
Historical Low Density Medium Density High Density Historical Average
Source: Historical housing activity (2006-2015) based on Statistics Canada building permits, Catalogue 64-001-XIB
Page 3-7
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
5. Existing Units and Population Change (Appendix A – Schedules 3 and 4)
Existing households as of 2016 are based on the 2011 Census, plus
estimated residential units constructed between 2011 and 2015, assuming
a 6-month lag between construction and occupancy (refer to Schedule 2).
The decline in average occupancy levels for existing housing units is
calculated in Schedules 3 through 4, by aging the existing population over
the forecast period. The forecast population decline in existing
households over the 2016 to 2026 forecast period is estimated at
approximately 300.
6. Employment (Appendix A – Schedules 9a through 11)
The employment projection is largely based on the activity rate method,
which is defined as the number of jobs in a Town divided by the number of
residents. Key employment sectors include primary, industrial,
commercial/population-related, institutional, and work-at-home, which are
considered individually below.
The Town’s 20111 employment base by place of work is outlined in
Schedule 9a. The 2011 employment base is comprised of the following
sectors:
o 630 primary (approx. 7%);
o 1,180 work-at-home employment (approx. 14%);
o 1,790 industrial (approx. 21%);
o 3,610 commercial/population-related (approx. 42%);
o 1,290 institutional (approx. 15%); and
The 2011 employment base by usual place of work, including work-at-
home, is approximately 8,500 jobs. An additional 810 employees have
been identified for the Town in 2011 that have no fixed place of work
(N.F.P.O.W.).2 The 2011 employment base, including N.F.P.O.W., totals
approximately 9,310.
Schedule 9b, Appendix A, summarizes the employment forecast,
excluding work-at-home employment and N.F.P.O.W. employment, which
1 2011 employment based on Statistics Canada 2011 Place of Work employment dataset. 2 Statistics Canada defines "No Fixed Place of Work" (N.F.P.O.W.) employees as, "persons who do not go from home to the same work place location at the beginning of each shift. Such persons include building and landscape contractors, travelling salespersons, independent truck drivers, etc.
Page 3-8
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
is the basis for the D.C. employment forecast. The impact on municipal
services from work-at-home employees have already been included in the
population forecast. The impacts of municipal services related to
N.F.P.O.W. employees have largely been included in the employment
forecast by usual place of work (i.e. employment and G.F.A. in the retail
and accommodation sector generated from N.F.P.O.W. construction
employment). Furthermore, since these employees have no fixed work
address, they cannot be captured in the non-residential gross floor area
(G.F.A.) calculation. Accordingly, work-at-home and N.F.P.O.W.
employees have been removed from the D.C. employment forecast and
calculation.
Total employment for the Town of Grimsby (excluding work-at-home and
N.F.P.O.W. employment) is anticipated to reach approximately 8,945 by
2026. This represents an employment increase of 935 additional jobs
over the 10-year forecast periods.
7. Non-Residential Sq.ft. Estimates (Gross Floor Area (G.F.A.)), Appendix A –
Schedule 9b)
Square footage estimates were calculated in Schedule 9b based on the
following employee density assumptions:1
o 1,300 sq.ft. per employee for industrial;
o 550 sq.ft. per employee for commercial/population-related; and
o 700 sq.ft. per employee for institutional employment.
The Town-wide incremental non-residential G.F.A. increase is anticipated
to be 623,200 sq.ft. over the 10-year forecast period.
In terms of percentage growth, the long-term incremental G.F.A. forecast
by sector is broken down as follows:
o industrial – approx. 24%;
o commercial/population-related – approx. 58%; and
o institutional – approx. 18%.
1 Based on Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. employment surveys across eastern Ontario.
Page 4-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
4. The Approach to Calculating the Charge
4.1 Introduction
This chapter addresses the requirements of s.s.5(1) of the D.C.A., with respect to the
establishment of the need for service which underpins the D.C. calculation. These
requirements are illustrated schematically in Figure 4-1.
4.2 Services Potentially Involved
Table 4-1 lists the full range of Town service categories which are provided within the
Town.
A number of these services are defined in s.s.2(4) of the D.C.A. as being ineligible for
inclusion in D.C. These are shown as “ineligible” on Table 4-1. Two ineligible costs
defined in s.s.5(3) of the D.C.A. are “computer equipment” and “rolling stock with an
estimated useful life of (less than) seven years...” In addition, local roads are covered
separately under subdivision agreements and related means (as are other local
services). Services which are potentially eligible for inclusion in the Town’s D.C. are
indicated with a “Yes.”
4.3 Increase in the Need for Service
The D.C. calculation commences with an estimate of “the increase in the need for
service attributable to the anticipated development,” for each service to be covered by
the by-law. There must be some form of link or attribution between the anticipated
development and the estimated increase in the need for service. While the need could
conceivably be expressed generally in terms of units of capacity, s.s.5(1)3, which
requires that Council indicate that it intends to ensure that such an increase in need will
be met, suggests that a project-specific expression of need would be most appropriate.
4.4 Local Service Policy
Some of the need for services generated by additional development consists of local
services related to a plan of subdivision. As such, they will be required as a condition of
subdivision agreements or consent conditions.
Page 4-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Figure 4-1 The Process of Calculating a Development Charge under the D.C.A., as amended
Page 4-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Table 4-1 Categories of Municipal Services to be Addressed as Part of the Calculation
Categories of Municipal Services
Eligibility for
Inclusion in the D.C.
Calculation
Service Components
Maximum Potential
D.C. Recovery
%
1. Services Related to a Highway and Related Infrastructure
Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
1.1 Arterial roads 1.2 Collector roads 1.3 Bridges, culverts and roundabouts 1.4 Local municipal roads 1.5 Traffic signals 1.6 Sidewalks and streetlights 1.7 Active transportation
100 100 100
0 100 100 100
2. Other Transport-ation Services
n/a n/a n/a Yes Yes Yes n/a n/a
2.1 Transit vehicles & facilities 2.2 Other transit infrastructure 2.3 Municipal parking spaces - indoor 2.4 Municipal parking spaces - outdoor 2.5 Works yards 2.6 Rolling stock1 2.7 Ferries 2.8 Airport
100 100 90 90
100 100 90 90
3. Stormwater Drainage and Control Services
No Yes No No
3.1 Main channels and drainage trunks 3.2 Channel connections 3.3 Retention/detention ponds 3.4 Monitoring programs
100 100 100 100
4. Fire Protection Services
Yes Yes
Yes
4.1 Fire stations 4.2 Fire pumpers, aerials and rescue
vehicles 4.3 Small equipment and gear
100 100
100
5. Outdoor Recreation Services (i.e. Parks and Open Space)
Ineligible
Yes
Yes Yes
Yes
Yes
5.1 Acquisition of land for parks, woodlots and E.S.A.s
5.2 Development of area municipal parks
5.3 Development of district parks 5.4 Development of municipal-wide
parks 5.5 Development of special purpose
parks 5.6 Parks rolling stock1 and yards
0
90
90
90
90 90
1with 7+ year life time
Page 4-4
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Categories of Municipal Services
Eligibility for
Inclusion in the D.C.
Calculation
Service Components
Maximum Potential
D.C. Recovery
%
6. Indoor Recreation Services
Yes
Yes
6.1 Arenas, indoor pools, fitness facilities, community centres, etc. (including land)
6.2 Recreation vehicles and equipment1
90
90
7. Library Services
Yes
No Yes
7.1 Public library space (incl. furniture and equipment)
7.2 Library vehicles¹ 7.3 Library materials
90
90 90
8. Electrical Power Services
Ineligible Ineligible Ineligible
8.1 Electrical substations 8.2 Electrical distribution system 8.3 Electrical system rolling stock1
0 0 0
9. Provision of Cultural, Entertain-ment and Tourism Facilities and Convention Centres
Ineligible
Ineligible
9.1 Cultural space (e.g. art galleries, museums and theatres)
9.2 Tourism facilities and convention centres
0
0
10. Waste-water Services
n/a Yes n/a No
10.1 Treatment plants 10.2 Sewage trunks 10.3 Local systems 10.4 Vehicles and equipment
100 100
0 100
11. Water Supply Services
n/a Yes n/a No
11.1 Treatment plants 11.2 Distribution systems 11.3 Local systems 11.4 Vehicles and equipment
100 100
0 100
12. Waste Manage-ment Services
Ineligible
Ineligible n/a
n/a
12.1 Collection, transfer vehicles and equipment (solid waste)
12.2 Landfills and other disposal facilities 12.3 Waste diversion vehicles and
equipment 12.4 Other waste diversion facilities
0
0 90
90
1with 7+ year life time
Page 4-5
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Categories of Municipal Services
Eligibility for
Inclusion in the D.C.
Calculation
Service Components
Maximum Potential
D.C. Recovery
%
13. Police Services
n/a n/a n/a
13.1 Police detachments 13.2 Police rolling stock1 13.3 Small equipment and gear
100 100 100
14. Homes for the Aged
n/a 14.1 Homes for the aged space 90
15. Child Care n/a 15.1 Child care space 90
16. Health n/a n/a
16.1 Health department space 16.2 Health department vehicles¹
90 90
17. Social Housing
n/a 17.1 Social housing space 90
18. Provincial Offences Act (P.O.A.)
n/a 18.1 P.O.A. space 90
19. Social Services
n/a 19.1 Social service space 90
20. Ambulance n/a n/a
20.1 Ambulance station space 20.2 Vehicles1
90 90
21. Hospital Provision
Ineligible 21.1 Hospital capital contributions 0
22. Provision of Head-quarters for the General Admin-istration of Munici-palities and Area Municipal Boards
Ineligible Ineligible Ineligible
22.1 Office space 22.2 Office furniture 22.3 Computer equipment
0 0 0
1with 7+ year life time
Page 4-6
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Categories of Municipal Services
Eligibility for
Inclusion in the D.C.
Calculation
Service Components
Maximum Potential
D.C. Recovery
%
23. Other Services
Yes
Yes
23.1 Studies in connection with acquiring buildings, rolling stock, materials and equipment, and improving land2 and facilities, including the D.C. background study cost
23.2 Interest on money borrowed to pay for growth-related capital
0-100
0-100
1with a 7+ year life time 2same percentage as service component to which it pertains
Eligibility for Inclusion in the
D.C. Calculation
Description
Yes Municipality provides the service – service has been included in the D.C. calculation.
No Municipality provides the service – service has not been included in the D.C. calculation.
n/a Municipality does not provide the service.
Ineligible Service is ineligible for inclusion in the D.C. calculation.
4.5 Capital Forecast
Paragraph 7 of s.s.5(1) of the D.C.A. requires that “the capital costs necessary to
provide the increased services must be estimated.” The Act goes on to require two
potential cost reductions and the Regulation sets out the way in which such costs are to
be presented. These requirements are outlined below.
These estimates involve capital costing of the increased services discussed above.
This entails costing actual projects or the provision of service units, depending on how
each service has been addressed.
The capital costs include:
a) costs to acquire land or an interest therein (including a leasehold interest);
b) costs to improve land;
c) costs to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures;
Page 4-7
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
d) costs to acquire, lease or improve facilities, including rolling stock (with a useful
life of 7 or more years), furniture and equipment (other than computer
equipment), materials acquired for library circulation, reference or information
purposes;
e) interest on money borrowed to pay for the above-referenced costs;
f) costs to undertake studies in connection with the above-referenced matters; and
g) costs of the D.C. background study.
In order for an increase in need for service to be included in the D.C. calculation,
Council must indicate “...that it intends to ensure that such an increase in need will be
met” (s.s.5 (1)3). This can be done if the increase in service forms part of a Council-
approved Official Plan, capital forecast or similar expression of the intention of Council
(O.Reg. 82/98 s.3). The capital program contained herein reflects the Town’s approved
and proposed capital budgets and master servicing/needs studies.
4.6 Treatment of Credits
Section 8 para. 5 of O.Reg. 82/98 indicates that a development charge background
study must set out “the estimated value of credits that are being carried forward relating
to the service.” s.s.17 para. 4 of the same Regulation indicates that “...the value of the
credit cannot be recovered from future development charges,” if the credit pertains to an
ineligible service. This implies that a credit for eligible services can be recovered from
future D.C.s. As a result, this provision should be made in the calculation, in order to
avoid a funding shortfall with respect to future service needs. There are no current
credit obligations to be included in the D.C. calculations at this time.
4.7 Eligible Debt and Committed Excess Capacity
Section 66 of the D.C.A. states that, for the purposes of developing a D.C. by-law, a
debt incurred with respect to an eligible service may be included as a capital cost,
subject to any limitations or reductions in the Act. Similarly, s.18 of O.Reg. 82/98
indicates that debt with respect to an ineligible service may be included as a capital
cost, subject to several restrictions.
In order for such costs to be eligible, two conditions must apply. First, they must have
funded excess capacity which is able to meet service needs attributable to the
anticipated development. Second, the excess capacity must be “committed,” that is,
either before or at the time it was created, Council must have expressed a clear
intention that it would be paid for by D.C.s or other similar charges; for example, this
may have been done as part of previous development charge processes. It is noted
Page 4-8
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
that the growth-related debt to which the principal and interest costs need to be
recovered, has been included within the capital detail sheet for Indoor and Outdoor
Recreation Services, Fire Protection Services, and Services Related to a Highway.
4.8 Existing Reserve Funds
Section 35 of the D.C.A. states that:
“The money in a reserve fund established for a service may be spent only for capital costs determined under paragraphs 2 to 8 of subsection 5(1).”
There is no explicit requirement under the D.C.A. calculation method set out in s.s.5(1)
to net the outstanding reserve fund balance as part of making the D.C. calculation;
however, s.35 does restrict the way in which the funds are used in future.
For services which are subject to a per capita based, service level “cap,” the reserve
fund balance should be applied against the development-related costs for which the
charge was imposed, once the project is constructed (i.e. the needs of recent growth).
This cost component is distinct from the development-related costs for the next 10-year
period, which underlie the D.C. calculation herein.
The alternative would involve the Town spending all reserve fund monies prior to
renewing each by-law, which would not be a sound basis for capital budgeting. Thus,
the Town will use these reserve funds for the Town’s cost share of applicable
development-related projects, which are required but have not yet been undertaken, as
a way of directing the funds to the benefit of the development which contributed them
(rather than to future development, which will generate the need for additional facilities
directly proportionate to future growth).
Page 4-9
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
The Town’s D.C. Reserve Fund Balances by service as of December 31, 2015, along
with commitments for capital works in progress, are as follows:
4.9 Deductions
The D.C.A. potentially requires that five deductions be made to the increase in the need
for service. These relate to:
the level of service ceiling;
uncommitted excess capacity;
benefit to existing development;
anticipated grants, subsidies and other contributions; and
10% reduction for certain services.
The requirements behind each of these reductions are addressed as follows:
4.9.1 Reduction Required by Level of Service Ceiling – Non-prescribed services
This is designed to ensure that the increase in need included in 4.3 are based upon the
average level of service provided in the Municipality over the 10-year period
immediately preceding the preparation of the background study.
O.Reg. 82.98 (s.4) goes further to indicate that “…both the quantity and quality of a
service shall be taken into account in determining the level of service and the average
level of service.”
In many cases, this can be done by establishing a quantity measure in terms of units as
floor area, land area or road length per capita and a quality measure, in terms of the
average cost of providing such units based on replacement costs, engineering
standards or recognized performance measurement systems, depending on
Service Dec. 31/15 Commitments
Adjusted Dec.
31/15
Services Related to a Highway $1,433,068.93 $108,611.00 $1,324,457.93
Other Transportation Services $27,933.07 $27,933.07
Parking $66,619.16 $66,619.16
Fire Protection Services $430,788.08 $430,788.08
Indoor and Outdoor Recreation Services $702,830.55 $702,830.55
Library Services $603,492.70 $603,492.70
Administration $401,925.13 $401,925.13
Stormwater Drainage and Control Services $298,903.20 $298,903.20
Wastewater Services $820,896.74 $111,896.74 $709,000.00
Water Services $486,986.70 $62,874.26 $424,112.44
Total $5,273,444.26 $283,382.00 $4,990,062.26
Page 4-10
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
circumstances. When the quantity and quality factor are multiplied together, they
produce a measure of the level of service, which meets the requirements of the Act, i.e.
cost per unit.
The average service level calculation sheets for each service component in the D.C.
calculation are set out in Appendix B.
4.9.2 Reduction Required by Level of Service Ceiling – Prescribed services
Prescribed services (currently only for transit) are based upon the planned level of
service over the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background
study. The method of calculating the service standard for prescribed services is
prescribed in the regulations, as amended.
For the purposes of section 5, the estimate for the increase in the need for a prescribed
service shall not exceed the planned level of service over the 10-year period
immediately following the preparation of the background study required under section
10. 2015, c. 26, s. 4.
4.9.3 Reduction for Uncommitted Excess Capacity
Paragraph 5 of s.s.5(1) requires a deduction from the increase in the need for service
attributable to the anticipated development that can be met using the Town’s “excess
capacity,” other than excess capacity which is “committed” (discussed above in 4.6).
Based on O.Reg. 82/98, s.5, for the purposes of paragraph 5 of subsection 5 (1) of the
Act, “Excess capacity” is uncommitted excess capacity unless, either before or at the
time the excess capacity was created, the council of the municipality expressed a clear
intention that the excess capacity would be paid for by D.C.s or other similar charges.
4.9.4 Reduction for Benefit to Existing Development
This step involves a further reduction in the need, by the extent to which such an
increase in service would benefit existing development. The level of services cap in
4.9.1 (and 4.9.2) is related, but is not the identical requirement. Sanitary, storm and
water trunks are highly localized to growth areas and can be more readily allocated in
this regard than other services such as services related to a highway, which do not have
a fixed service area.
Where existing development has an adequate service level which will not be tangibly
increased by an increase in service, no benefit would appear to be involved. For
example, where expanding existing library facilities simply replicates what existing
Page 4-11
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
residents are receiving, they receive very limited (or no) benefit as a result. On the
other hand, where a clear existing service problem is to be remedied, a deduction
should be made accordingly.
In the case of services such as recreation facilities, community parks, libraries, etc., the
service is typically provided on a Municipal-wide system basis. For example, facilities of
the same type may provide different services (i.e. leisure pool vs. competitive pool),
different programs (i.e. hockey vs. figure skating) and different time availability for the
same service (i.e. leisure skating available on Wednesday in one arena and Thursday in
another). As a result, residents will travel to different facilities to access the services
they want at the times they wish to use them, and facility location generally does not
correlate directly with residence location. Even where it does, displacing users from an
existing facility to a new facility frees up capacity for use by others and generally results
in only a very limited benefit to existing development. Further, where an increase in
demand is not met for a number of years, a negative service impact to existing
development is involved for a portion of the planning period.
4.9.5 Reduction for Anticipated Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions
This step involves reducing the capital costs necessary to provide the increased
services by capital grants, subsidies and other contributions (including direct developer
contributions required due to the local service policy) made or anticipated by Council
and in accordance with various rules such as the attribution between the share related
to new vs. existing development. That is, some grants and contributions may not
specifically be applicable to growth or where Council targets fundraising as a measure
to offset impacts on taxes (O.Reg. 82.98 s.6).
4.9.6 The 10% Reduction
Paragraph 8 of s.s.5(1) of the D.C.A. requires that, “the capital costs must be reduced
by 10 percent.” This paragraph does not apply to water supply services, waste water
services, storm water drainage and control services, services related to a highway,
police, and fire protection services. The primary services to which the 10% reduction
does apply include services such as parks, recreation, libraries, health, childcare/social
services, ambulance, homes for the aged and transit. The 10% is to be netted from the
capital costs necessary to provide the increased services, once the other deductions
have been made, as per the infrastructure costs sheets in Chapter 5.
Page 4-12
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
4.10 Municipal-Wide vs. Area Rating
This step involves determining whether all of the subject costs are to be recovered on a
uniform municipal-wide basis or whether some or all are to be recovered on an area-
specific basis. Under the amended D.C.A., it is now mandatory to “consider” area-rating
of services (providing charges for specific areas and services), however, it is not
mandatory to implement area-rating.
4.11 Allocation of Development
This step involves relating the costs involved to anticipated development for each period
under consideration and using allocations between residential and non-residential
development and between one type of development and another, to arrive at a schedule
of charges.
Page 5-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
5. Development Charge Eligible Cost Analysis by Service
5.1 Introduction
This chapter outlines the basis for calculating eligible costs for the D.C.s to be applied
on a uniform basis. In each case, the required calculation process set out in s.5(1)
paragraphs 2 to 8 in the D.C.A. and described in Chapter 4, was followed in determining
D.C. eligible costs.
The nature of the capital projects and timing identified in the Chapter reflects Council’s
current intention. Over time, however, Town projects and Council priorities change and
accordingly, Council’s intentions may alter and different capital projects (and timing)
may be required to meet the need for services required by new growth.
5.2 Service Levels and 10-Year Capital Costs for D.C. Calculation
This section evaluates the development-related capital requirements for all of the
services over a 10-year planning period. Each service component is evaluated on two
format sheets: the average historical 10-year level of service calculation (see Appendix
B), which “caps” the D.C. amounts; and, the infrastructure cost calculation, which
determines the potential D.C. recoverable cost.
5.2.1 Administration
The D.C.A. permits the inclusion of studies undertaken to facilitate the completion of the
Town’s capital works program. The Town has the ability to make a provision for the
inclusion of new studies undertaken to facilitate this D.C. process, as well as other
studies which benefit growth (in whole or in part). The list of studies included are as
follows:
2016 Development Charge Update Study;
2021 Development Charge Study;
Servicing Studies;
Sub-watershed Studies;
Parks, Recreation, and Fire Master Plans;
Transportation Study;
Official Plan Update; and
Zoning By-law.
Page 5-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
The gross capital cost of these studies total $1,007,700. A deduction of $230,910 has
been made for to recognize the amount that benefits existing development. With a
reserve fund adjustment of $401,925 and after the mandatory 10% deduction, the net
growth-related capital cost is $325,848. This amount has been included in the D.C.
calculation.
These costs have been allocated 81% residential and 19% non-residential based on the
incremental growth in population to employment for the 10-year forecast period.
Page 5-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS COVERED IN THE DC CALCULATION
Town of Grimsby
Service:Administration Studies
Less: Less:
Prj.NoResidential
Share
Non-
Residential
Share
2016-2025 81% 19%
1 Development Charge Study - Update 2016 17,900 0 17,900 0 17,900 1,790 16,110 13,010 3,100
2 Development Charge Study 2021 69,000 0 69,000 0 69,000 6,900 62,100 50,151 11,949
3 Servicing Studies 2019 72,100 0 72,100 18,025 54,075 54,075 43,670 10,405
4 Sub-watershed Studies 2018 82,400 0 82,400 20,600 61,800 61,800 49,909 11,891
5 Parks Master Plan 2017 107,400 0 107,400 26,850 80,550 8,055 72,495 58,546 13,949
6 Recreation Master Plan 2018 92,100 0 92,100 23,025 69,075 6,908 62,168 50,205 11,962
7 Transportation Study - Casablanca / QEW 2016 60,000 0 60,000 6,000 54,000 54,000 43,609 10,391
8 Official Plan Update 2017 99,800 0 99,800 24,950 74,850 7,485 67,365 54,403 12,962
9 Zoning By-law 2018 113,000 0 113,000 19,210 93,790 9,379 84,411 68,169 16,242
10 Fire Master Plan 2016 52,000 0 52,000 13,000 39,000 39,000 31,496 7,504
11 Fire Master Plan 2021 57,000 0 57,000 14,250 42,750 42,750 34,524 8,226
12 Ward Boundary Study 2016 30,000 0 30,000 0 30,000 3,000 27,000 21,805 5,195
13 East End Waterfront Trail Plan 2018 50,000 0 50,000 12,500 37,500 3,750 33,750 27,256 6,494
14 Downtown Comm. Improvement Plan Update 2019 35,000 0 35,000 17,500 17,500 1,750 15,750 12,719 3,031
15 Transit Investigation Study 2016 70,000 0 70,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 28,265 6,735
16 Reserve Adjustment 401,925 (401,925) (401,925) (324,587) (77,338)
Total 1,007,700 0 0 1,007,700 632,835 0 374,865 49,017 325,848 263,149 62,699
Net Capital
CostSubtotal
Benefit to
Existing
Development
Grants,
Subsidies and
Other
Contributions
Attributable to
New
Development
Other (e.g.
10%
Statutory
Deduction)
Total
Potential DC Recoverable Cost
Increased Service Needs Attributable to
Anticipated Development Timing (year)
Gross
Capital Cost
Estimate
(2016$)
Post
Period
Benefit
Other
Deductions
Page 5-4
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
5.2.2 Indoor and Outdoor Recreation Services
The Town currently has 102 acres of parkland within its jurisdiction. This parkland
consists of various sized neighbourhood and community parks. Over the historical 10-
year period (2006-2015), The Town has had an average of 4 acres of parkland and 3.4
parkland amenities items per 1,000 people. Further, the Town’s current Parks and
Recreation fleet operates with 22 vehicles. Over the historical 10-year period (2006-
2015), the Town has had an average of 0.9 vehicles per 1,000 population. Including
parkland development, parkland amenities (e.g. ball diamonds, playground equipment,
soccer fields, etc.), and vehicles, the level of service provided is $419 per capita. When
applied over the forecast period, this average level of service translates into a D.C.-
eligible amount of $1,639,893.
With respect to indoor recreation facilities, there are currently 16 facilities provided by
the Town. Together, these facilities total 196,088 sq.ft. The average historical level of
service for the previous ten years has been approximately 7.59 sq.ft. of space per
capita or an investment of $1,455 per capita. Based on this service standard, the Town
would be eligible to collect $5,702,346 from D.C.s for recreation facility space.
In total for indoor and outdoor recreation services, the total D.C.-eligible amount that the
Town can recover from D.C.s is $7,342,238.
Based on the projected growth over the 10-year forecast period, the Town has identified
$10,236,333 in future growth capital costs for indoor and outdoor recreation. These
projects include new subdivision park development, development of the Forty Mile
Creek/Waterfront Trail Links, the Sports Complex Development (including financing
costs), an addition to the Peach King Centre, a Mountain Recreation Centre and a
provision for additional vehicles. The Town has identified $1,932,900 as the amount
that benefits existing development and $6,100 as the amount that benefits development
post-2025. With the application of the reserve balance of $702,831, the net growth
capital cost after the mandatory 10% deduction is $6,790,002. This amount is included
in the D.C. calculation.
As the predominant users of outdoor recreation tend to be residents of the Town, the
forecast growth-related costs have been allocated 95% to residential and 5% to non-
residential.
Page 5-5
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS COVERED IN THE DC CALCULATION
Town of Grimsby
Service: Indoor and Outdoor Recreation
Less: Less:
Prj.NoResidential
Share
Non-
Residential
Share
2016-2025 95% 5%
1 New Subdivision Park Development 2016-2023 362,000 6,100 355,900 0 355,900 35,590 320,310 304,295 16,016
2 Forty Mile Creek/Waterfront Trail Links 2016-2016 339,000 0 339,000 27,100 311,900 31,190 280,710 266,675 14,036
3West End Waterfront Clock Tower Park
Amenity2017 220,000 0 220,000 0 220,000 22,000 198,000 188,100 9,900
4 Sports Complex Development 2016-2017 5,460,000 0 5,460,000 1,365,000 4,095,000 409,500 3,685,500 3,501,225 184,275
5
Sports Complex Development - Growth
Related Debt Interest Anticipated
(Discounted)
2017-2026 252,333 0 252,333 0 252,333 0 252,333 239,716 12,617
6Provision for Parks and Recreation
Vehicles2016-2025 140,000 0 140,000 0 140,000 14,000 126,000 119,700 6,300
7 Peach King Centre Addition 2018 2,163,000 0 2,163,000 540,800 1,622,200 162,220 1,459,980 1,386,981 72,999
8 Mountain Recreation Centre 2016-2017 1,300,000 0 1,300,000 0 1,300,000 130,000 1,170,000 1,111,500 58,500
9 Reserve Adjustment 702,831 (702,831) (702,831) (667,689) (35,142)
Total 10,236,333 6,100 0 10,230,233 2,635,731 0 7,594,502 804,500 6,790,002 6,450,502 339,500
Net Capital
CostSubtotal
Benefit to
Existing
Development
Grants,
Subsidies and
Other
Contributions
Attributable to
New
Development
Other (e.g.
10%
Statutory
Deduction)
Total
Potential DC Recoverable Cost
Increased Service Needs Attributable to
Anticipated DevelopmentTiming
(year)
Gross Capital
Cost
Estimate
(2016$)
Post
Period
Benefit
Other
Deductions
Page 5-6
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
5.2.3 Library Services
The Town provides the Grimsby Public Library which totals 16,000 sq.ft. in library
space. Over the past ten years, the average level of service was 0.63 sq.ft. of space
per capita or an investment of $242 per capita. This equates to a total of $947,072 that
the Town would be eligible to collect from D.C.s.
Grimsby has included a provision for additional facility space in the amount of $945,000.
After the 10% mandatory reduction, the amount to include in the development charge is
$850,500. Note: this amount is in addition to the 2015 year-end reserve fund balance of
$603,493.
In addition, the Library currently has 52,849 collection materials. These collection items
include various materials including books, periodicals, audio and video tapes, and
DVDs, all of which have a total replacement value of approximately $1.7 million. Over
the historical 10-year period (2006-2015), the average level of service has been 2.13
items per capita or $68 per capita. This amounts to a D.C. eligible amount of $267,658.
The Town has included provisions for additional collection materials totalling $260,000.
After the 10% mandatory deduction, the amount included in the development charge is
$234,000.
While library usage is predominately residential based, there is some use of the facilities
by non-residential users, for the purpose of research. To acknowledge this use of the
growth-related capital costs have been allocated 95% residential and 5% non-
residential.
Page 5-7
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS COVERED IN THE DC CALCULATION
Town of Grimsby
Service:Library Facilities
Less: Less:
Prj.NoResidential
Share
Non-
Residential
Share
2016-2025 95% 5%
1 Provision for Library Facilities* 2025 2016-2025 945,000 - 945,000 - 945,000 94,500 850,500 807,975 42,525
Total 945,000 0 0 945,000 0 0 945,000 94,500 850,500 807,975 42,525
*Provision is in addition to the 2015 Year End Reserve Balance of $603,493
Net Capital
CostSubtotal
Benefit to
Existing
Development
Grants,
Subsidies and
Other
Contributions
Attributable to
New
Development
Other (e.g.
10%
Statutory
Deduction)
Total
Potential DC Recoverable Cost
Increased Service Needs
Attributable to Anticipated
DevelopmentTiming
(year)
Gross
Capital Cost
Estimate
(2016$)
Post
Period
Benefit
Other
Deductions
Timing
(year)
To
Page 5-8
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS COVERED IN THE DC CALCULATION
Town of Grimsby
Service:Library Collection Materials
Less: Less:
Prj.NoResidential
Share
Non-
Residential
Share
2016-2025 95% 5%
1 Provision for Library Materials 2016-2020 130,000 - 130,000 - 130,000 13,000 117,000 111,150 5,850
2 Provision for Library Materials 2021-2025 130,000 - 130,000 - 130,000 13,000 117,000 111,150 5,850
Total 260,000 0 0 260,000 0 0 260,000 26,000 234,000 222,300 11,700
Net Capital
CostSubtotal
Benefit to
Existing
Development
Grants,
Subsidies and
Other
Contributions
Attributable to
New
Development
Other (e.g.
10%
Statutory
Deduction)
Total
Potential DC Recoverable Cost
Increased Service Needs
Attributable to Anticipated
DevelopmentTiming
(year)
Gross
Capital Cost
Estimate
(2016$)
Post
Period
Benefit
Other
Deductions
Page 5-9
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
5.2.4 Parking Services
The Town provides 158 municipal parking spaces throughout four (4) lots in Grimsby.
Over the past ten years, the average level of service was 6.3 spaces per 1,000 people
or an investment of $19 per capita. This equates to a total D.C.-eligible amount of
$76,087 for municipal parking spaces.
Grimsby has included the capital costs for the Winston/Fifth Wheel ROW Trail Parking
and the Casablanca/North Service Road Parking Lot at a total gross capital cost of
$247,000. The Town has identified the $79,600 as the amount that will benefit
development post-2025 and $24,700 that will benefit existing development. After the
application of the reserve fund balance in the amount of $66,619 and the 10%
mandatory deduction, the net D.C.-eligible amount for inclusion in the calculations is
$61,811.
These costs have been allocated 81% residential and 19% non-residential based on the
incremental growth in population to employment for the 10-year forecast period.
Page 5-10
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS COVERED IN THE DC CALCULATION
Town of Grimsby
Service:Parking Spaces
Less: Less:
Prj.NoResidential
Share
Non-
Residential
Share
2016-2025 81% 19%
1 Winston/Fifth Wheel ROW Trail Parking 2018 67,000 0 67,000 6,700 60,300 6,030 54,270 43,827 10,443
2Casablanca/NSRD Parking Lot (SE
corner)2019 180,000 79,600 100,400 18,000 82,400 8,240 74,160 59,890 14,270
3 Reserve Adjustment 66,619 (66,619) (66,619) (53,800) (12,819)
Total 247,000 79,600 0 167,400 91,319 0 76,081 14,270 61,811 49,917 11,894
Net Capital
CostSubtotal
Benefit to
Existing
Development
Grants,
Subsidies and
Other
Contributions
Attributable to
New
Development
Other (e.g.
10%
Statutory
Deduction)
Total
Potential DC Recoverable Cost
Increased Service Needs Attributable to
Anticipated DevelopmentTiming
(year)
Gross
Capital Cost
Estimate
(2016$)
Post
Period
Benefit
Other
Deductions
Page 5-11
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
5.2.5 Services Related to a Highway
Grimsby owns and maintains 97 km of rural and urban 2-lane roadways. This amounts
to an average level of investment of $6,741 per capita, resulting in a D.C. eligible
recovery amount of $26,425,896 over the 10-year forecast period (2016-2025).
With respect to future needs, the capital projects include road improvement and
reconstruction (with upgrades) projects throughout the Town and sidewalks within the
Winston Road Neighbourhood Area. Growth related financing costs have been
included for the following roads projects:
Marlow – Park to 280 m west;
Central Avenue – Baker to Park;
Casablanca Boulevard/Q.E.W. Ramp Improvements;
Winston Road – Hunter to 30 m east of Windward;
Winston Road – Hunter to 30 m west of Oakes – north side urbanization and
bikeway;
Windward to 5th Wheel; and
North Service Road – 5th Wheel (Winston Road) to 500 m east.
The gross capital cost of these projects is $20,264,878. After deductions for benefit to
existing development ($2,304,500), $2.7 million in grants and subsidies, and the
application of the reserve fund balance of $973,722, the D.C.-eligible cost to be
recovered over the buildout forecast period is $14,286,657.
The Town also has 25,007 sq.ft. of facility space within depots and domes which
equates to $150 per capita and a D.C.-recoverable amount of $587,608 over the
forecast period.
The Town has identified the need for an expansion to the Operations Centre Facility
and a new Snow Storage Facility at a total gross capital cost of 1,430,000. With a
benefit to existing development of $544,000 and a reserve fund adjustment of $311,050,
the amount recoverable from development charges is $574,950.
Further, the Town provides 46 services related to highway vehicles, which equate to an
average level of investment of $159 per capita, and an amount recoverable from D.C.s
of $622,731 over the forecast period.
The Town has identified the need for four (4) new roads and related vehicles over the
buildout forecast. The gross capital cost of these vehicles is $681,800. After the
Page 5-12
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
application of the reserve fund balance of $67,620, the net D.C.-recoverable amount is
$614,180.
In total, the amount included in the development charge for services related to a
highway is $14,002,908.
The residential/non-residential allocation for all roads and related services are based on
the ratio of population to employment over the buildout period. This results in a
residential/non-residential split of 81%/19%.
Page 5-13
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS COVERED IN THE DC CALCULATION
Town of Grimsby
Service: Services Related to a Highway
Less:
Prj .NoResidential
Share
Non-Residential
Share
2016-2025 81% 19%
Road Improvements
1 Marlow - Park to 280m West 2018 418,000 0 418,000 209,000 209,000 168,785 40,215
2 Central Av - Baker to Park 2018 1,200,000 0 1,200,000 600,000 600,000 484,549 115,451
3Interest on Debt - Growth Related (Marlow &
Centrral Ave) - Discounted2018-2027 100,067 0 100,067 0 100,067 80,812 19,255
4 Casablanca Blvd/QEW Ramp Improvements 2019 3,000,000 0 3,000,000 300,000 2,700,000 2,180,470 519,530
5Interest on Debt - Growth Related (Casablanca
Blvd/QEW Ramp Improvements) - Discounted2019-2028 327,422 0 327,422 0 327,422 264,420 63,002
6 Winston Rd. - Hunter to 30m E of Windward 2017 3,980,000 0 3,980,000 398,000 1,300,000 2,282,000 1,842,901 439,099
7Interest on Debt - Growth Related (Winston Rd.
- Hunter to 30m E of Windward) - Discounted2017-2026 287,912 0 287,912 0 287,912 232,512 55,400
8 Concord Place - Windward easterly 2017 369,000 0 369,000 0 369,000 297,998 71,002
9Hunter Rd - NSR to 180m N (incl. watercourse
enclosure )2016 800,000 0 800,000 0 400,000 400,000 323,033 76,967
10 Hunter Rd. Bikeway 2017 75,000 0 75,000 7,500 67,500 54,512 12,988
11Winston Rd.- Hunter to 340m W of Oakes - N
side urbanization & bikeway2016-2017 1,020,000 0 1,020,000 102,000 918,000 741,360 176,640
12
Interest on Debt - Growth Related (Winston Rd.
- Hunter to 30m W of Oakes - N side
urbanization & bikeway) - Discounted
2017-2026 115,821 0 115,821 0 115,821 93,535 22,286
Sidewalks
13Sidewalks (Ex. Town ROW's within Winston
Road Neighbourhood Area)2017-2019 900,000 0 900,000 0 900,000 726,823 173,177
Road Reconstruction & Upgrade
14 Windward Dr @ NSRd - left turn lane 2017 150,000 0 150,000 0 150,000 121,137 28,863
15 NSRd - Windward to 5th Wheel (Winston Rd) 2017 2,730,000 0 2,730,000 273,000 2,457,000 1,984,227 472,773
16Interest on Debt - Growth Related (Windward to
5th Wheel) - Discounted2017-2026 309,991 0 309,991 0 309,991 250,343 59,648
17 NSRd - 5th Wheel (Winston Rd) to 500m east 2019 4,150,000 0 4,150,000 415,000 1,000,000 2,735,000 2,208,735 526,265
18
Interest on Debt - Growth Related (NSRd - 5th
Wheel (Winston Rd) to 500m east) -
Discounted
2019-2028 331,666 0 331,666 0 331,666 267,847 63,819
19 Reserve Adjustment 973,722 (973,722) (786,359) (187,362)
Total 20,264,878 0 0 20,264,878 3,278,222 2,700,000 14,286,657 11,537,638 2,749,019
Increased Service Needs Attributable to
Anticipated DevelopmentTiming
(year)
Gross Capital
Cost Estimate
(2016$)
Post Period
Benefit
Other
Deductions
Net Capital
CostBenefit to
Existing
Development
Grants, Subsidies and
Other Contributions
Attributable to New
Development
Total
Potential DC Recoverable Cost
Page 5-14
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS COVERED IN THE DC CALCULATION
Town of Grimsby
Service: Services Related to a Highway - Related Facilities
Less:
Prj .NoResidential
Share
Non-Residential
Share
2016-2025 81% 19%
1Operations Centre - Facility
Expansion 2018 1,200,000 0 1,200,000 360,000 840,000 678,368 161,632
2 Snow Storage Facility 2020 230,000 0 230,000 184,000 46,000 37,149 8,851
3 Reserve Fund Adjustment 311,050 (311,050) (251,198) (59,852)
Total 1,430,000 0 0 1,430,000 855,050 0 574,950 464,319 110,631
Increased Service Needs
Attributable to Anticipated
Development
Timing
(year)
Gross
Capital Cost
Estimate
(2016$)
Post Period
Benefit
Other
Deductions
Net Capital
CostBenefit to
Existing
Development
Grants, Subsidies and
Other Contributions
Attributable to New
Development
Total
Potential DC Recoverable Cost
Page 5-15
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS COVERED IN THE DC CALCULATION
Town of Grimsby
Service: Services Related to a Highway - Related Vehicles
Less:
Prj .NoResidential
Share
Non-Residential
Share
2016-2025 81% 19%
1 New Truck and Snow Plow 2019 250,000 0 250,000 0 250,000 201,895 48,105
2 New Sidewalk Snow Plow 2017 164,800 0 164,800 0 164,800 133,089 31,711
3 Stump Grinder 2016 17,000 0 17,000 0 17,000 13,729 3,271
4 Dump Truck 2016 250,000 0 250,000 0 250,000 201,895 48,105
5 Reserve Adjustment 67,620 (67,620) (54,608) (13,011)
Total 681,800 0 0 681,800 67,620 0 614,180 496,001 118,180
Increased Service Needs Attributable
to Anticipated DevelopmentTiming
(year)
Gross
Capital Cost
Estimate
(2016$)
Post Period
Benefit
Other
Deductions
Net Capital
CostBenefit to
Existing
Development
Grants, Subsidies and
Other Contributions
Attributable to New
Development
Total
Potential DC Recoverable Cost
Page 5-16
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
5.2.6 Fire Protection Services
Grimsby currently operates its fire services from two stations totalling 11,600 sq.ft. of
facility space, providing for an average level of service of 0.46 sq.ft. per capita or an
investment of $137 per capita.
The Town has identified the need for the replacement and expansion of Fire Hall #2 and
a new Training Centre to be located on the same property as well as a Third Station in
the West End. Gross capital costs for these projects total $8,512,000. In addition,
financing costs (discounted) have been included for Fire Hall #2 at a cost of $644,963.
The Town has identified a benefit to existing development deduction of $4,025,288
(including a reserve adjustment of $430,788). The Town has also identified other
deductions totaling $4.5 million which includes a deduction for such things as post
period benefit and amounts in excess of the service standard cap. The D.C.-eligible
amount the Town has included in the D.C. for Fire Facilities is $627,475.
The fire department has a current inventory of 10 vehicles. The 10-year historical
service standard is 0.3 vehicles per 1,000 population which equates to an investment of
$151 per capita. This results in a D.C.-eligible amount of $592,430 over the forecast
period.
The capital needs that have been identified for fire vehicles include six (6) vehicles in
total at a gross capital cost of $3.10 million. The Town has identified $2.5 million in
other deductions which include deductions for post period benefit as well as the amount
in excess of the service standard cap. After these deductions, the D.C.-recoverable
costs are $592,400.
Further, the fire department provides 48 firefighters with items of equipment and gear
for use in fire services. This results in a calculated average level of service of $19 per
capita for the historical 10-year period and a D.C.-eligible amount of $72,716.
For the forecast period, equipment for 18 additional firefighters have been identified as
required to service the anticipated development. The total gross capital costs total
$198,000. Other deductions of $125,300 have been identified by the Town. These
include deductions for post period benefit as well as the amount in excess of the service
standard. After these deductions, the D.C.-recoverable amount is $72,700.
In total, the amount included in the development charge for fire services is $1,292,575.
Page 5-17
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
These costs are shared between residential and non-residential based on the ratio of
population to employment over the forecast period, resulting in 81% being allocated to
residential development and 19% being allocated to non-residential development.
Page 5-18
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS COVERED IN THE DC CALCULATION
Town of Grimsby
Service: Fire Facilities
Less:
Prj .NoResidential
Share
Non-
Residential
Share
2016-2025 81% 19%
1 Fire Hall #2 & Training Station 2016-2017 5,112,000 1,209,000 3,903,000 3,191,800 711,200 574,352 136,848
2Interest on Debt (Fire Hall #2 & Training
Station) - Discounted2017-2026 644,963 152,500 492,463 402,700 89,763 72,491 17,272
3Fire Station #3 - including land (West
end) 2018-2019 3,400,000 3,142,700 257,300 0 257,300 207,791 49,509
4 Reserve Fund Adjustment 430,788 (430,788) (347,896) (82,892)
Total 9,156,963 4,504,200 4,652,763 4,025,288 0 627,475 506,737 120,738
Timing
(year)Benefit to
Existing
Development
Grants, Subsidies and
Other Contributions
Attributable to New
Development
Total
Net Capital
Cost
Potential DC Recoverable Cost
Increased Service Needs Attributable to
Anticipated Development
Gross
Capital Cost
Estimate
(2016$)
Other
Deductions
Page 5-19
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS COVERED IN THE DC CALCULATION
Town of Grimsby
Service: Fire Vehicles
Less:
Prj .NoResidential
Share
Non-
Residential
Share
2016-2025 81% 19%
1 Prevention Vehicle (582) 2018 50,000 0 50,000 0 50,000 40,379 9,621
2 Fire Tanker (536) - Station 3 2019 309,000 254,100 54,900 0 54,900 44,336 10,564
3 Fire Pumper (531) - Station 3 2019 750,000 616,800 133,200 0 133,200 107,570 25,630
4 Medical Rescue Vehicle (538) - Station 3 2019 129,000 106,100 22,900 0 22,900 18,494 4,406
5 Fire Aerial Platform (535) - Station 3 2019 1,803,000 1,482,800 320,200 0 320,200 258,588 61,612
6 Command Vehicle (505) - Station 3 2019 63,000 51,800 11,200 0 11,200 9,045 2,155
Total 3,104,000 2,511,600 592,400 0 0 592,400 478,411 113,989
Increased Service Needs Attributable to
Anticipated DevelopmentTiming
(year)
Gross
Capital Cost
Estimate
(2016$)
Other
Deductions
Net Capital
CostBenefit to
Existing
Development
Grants, Subsidies and
Other Contributions
Attributable to New
Development
Total
Potential DC Recoverable Cost
Page 5-20
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS COVERED IN THE DC CALCULATION
Town of Grimsby
Service: Fire Small Equipment and Gear
Less:
Prj .NoResidential
Share
Non-Residential
Share
2016-2025 81% 19%
1Additional Firefighters (8) -
Existing Urban Area2017 88,000 23,600 64,400 0 64,400 52,008 12,392
2
Additional Firefighters (10) -
Winston Road
Neighbourhood
2019 110,000 101,700 8,300 0 8,300 6,703 1,597
Total 198,000 125,300 72,700 0 0 72,700 58,711 13,989
Increased Service Needs
Attributable to Anticipated
Development
Timing
(year)
Gross
Capital Cost
Estimate
(2016$)
Other
Deductions
Net Capital
CostBenefit to
Existing
Development
Grants, Subsidies and
Other Contributions
Attributable to New
Development
Total
Potential DC Recoverable Cost
Page 5-21
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
5.3 Service Levels and Urban Buildout Capital Costs for Grimsby’s
D.C. Calculation
This section evaluates the development-related capital requirements for those services
over an urban-buildout planning period (2016-urban buildout).
5.3.1 Stormwater Drainage and Control Services
Grimsby has identified the need to upgrade the C.N. Crossing Culvert (400m East of
Baker Road) at a gross cost of $900,000. After the application of the reserve fund
balance of $298,903, the net D.C.-recoverable cost is $601,097.
These costs are shared between residential and non-residential development based on
the proportion of land area over the forecast period, resulting in 68% being allocated to
residential development and 32% being allocated to non-residential development.
5.3.2 Wastewater Services
In 2010 the Town had a West Grimsby Sanitary Modelling Report carried out which
recommended that the existing North Service Road and the Q.E.W. Crossing Sanitary
Sewers were adequate for existing development but required additional work to
accommodate growth in the proposed West End Development area. Subsequently,
$2.3 million was identified for inclusion in the 2014 D.C. Study for this work with a 10%
benefit to existing deduction.
In the fall of 2014 the Region of Niagara completed a major upgrade of the Roberts
Road Sewage Pump Station (S.P.S.) and force main with 3 to 4 times the pumping
capacity of the old S.P.S. The Roberts Road S.P.S. is located down-stream from the
D.C. sewer works required to service growth.
With the completion of the Regional works, Town staff felt it would be best to re-monitor
the upstream sewers to see what impact the new upgraded Roberts Road S.P.S. had
on flows. In 2015 and early 2016 the Town carried out extensive monitoring and then
modelled the existing pipe with the new S.P.S. The result was the existing pipe had
ample capacity for all new West End Development subject to some minor improvements
estimated at $400,000. This amount has been included in the 2016 D.C. study with
100% of the costs attributed to growth.
In addition to the work noted above, upgrades to Central Avenue sewers are also
included in the D.C. study at an estimated amount of $309,000. In total, $709,000 is
included in the D.C.
Page 5-22
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
The D.C. reserve balance for wastewater services has a current balance of $820,896.
With the updated project listing for wastewater applied, the net D.C.-recoverable cost for
wastewater will be zero. The reserve fund will then have a balance of $111,896. As the
Town continues to expand the water services to service growth, this amount is
recommended to be redirected to the water D.C. reserve fund to reduce the amount of
D.C. funding required for water services.
The growth-related wastewater costs are shared between residential and non-
residential development based on design flows in the Town, resulting in 84% being
allocated to residential development and 16% being allocated to non-residential
development.
5.3.3 Water Services
Grimsby has identified the need for five (5) water distribution projects over the forecast
period. The total gross cost of these projects is $2,075,400. A deduction of $792,700
has been made related to the benefit to existing development. After the deduction of
the benefit to existing development and the application of the reserve fund balance of
$424,112 (including the $111,896 redirected from the wastewater reserve fund), the net
D.C.-recoverable cost is $858,588.
The growth-related costs are shared between residential and non-residential
development based on design flows in the Town, resulting in 84% being allocated to
residential development and 16% being allocated to non-residential development.
Page 5-23
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS COVERED IN THE DC CALCULATION
Town of Grimsby
Service: Stormwater
Less:
Residential
Share
Non-Residential
Share
2016-Urban Buildout 68% 32%
1CN Crossing Culvert Upgrade
(400m E of Baker Rd)2017 900,000 - 900,000 - 900,000 613,942 286,058
2 Reserve Adjustment 298,903 (298,903) (203,899) (95,004)
Total 900,000 0 0 900,000 298,903 0 601,097 410,043 191,054
Prj.No
Increased Service Needs Attributable to
Anticipated DevelopmentTiming
(year)
Gross
Capital Cost
Estimate
(2016$)
Post Period
Benefit
Other
Deductions
Net Capital
CostBenefit to
Existing
Development
Grants, Subsidies and
Other Contributions
Attributable to New
Development
Total
Potential DC Recoverable Cost
Page 5-24
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS COVERED IN THE DC CALCULATION
Town of Grimsby
Service: Wastewater - Sewers
Less:
Residential
Share
Non-Residential
Share
2016-Urban Buildout 84% 16%
1 Central Avenue Upgrade for Developers 2020 309,000 - 309,000 - 309,000 259,560 49,440
2 NSRd , QEW Xing to Roberts PS 2016 400,000 - 400,000 - 400,000 336,000 64,000
3 Reserve Adjustment 709,000 (709,000) (595,560) (113,440)
Total 709,000 0 0 709,000 709,000 0 0 0 0
Prj.No
Increased Service Needs Attributable to
Anticipated DevelopmentTiming
(year)
Gross
Capital Cost
Estimate
(2016$)
Post Period
Benefit
Other
Deductions
Net Capital
CostBenefit to
Existing
Development
Grants, Subsidies and
Other Contributions
Attributable to New
Development
Total
Potential DC Recoverable Cost
Page 5-25
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS COVERED IN THE DC CALCULATION
Town of Grimsby
Service: Water Distribution
Less:
Residential
Share
Non-Residential
Share
2016-Urban Buildout 84% 16%
1 Marlow Av - Park to 270m west 2018 248,000 - 248,000 124,000 124,000 104,160 19,840
2 Central Av - Baker to Park 2017 760,800 - 760,800 380,400 380,400 319,536 60,864
3 Bedford Park- Central to Mary 2018 190,300 - 190,300 95,150 95,150 79,926 15,224
4 Kelson Av / QEW Xing 2021 772,600 - 772,600 193,150 579,450 486,738 92,712
5 Concord Pl - Windward to 120m easterly 2016 103,700 - 103,700 - 103,700 87,108 16,592
6 Reserve Adjustment 424,112 (424,112) (356,254) (67,858)
Total 2,075,400 0 0 2,075,400 1,216,812 0 858,588 721,214 137,374
Prj.No
Increased Service Needs Attributable to
Anticipated DevelopmentTiming
(year)
Gross
Capital Cost
Estimate
(2016$)
Post Period
Benefit
Other
Deductions
Net Capital
CostBenefit to
Existing
Development
Grants, Subsidies and
Other Contributions
Attributable to New
Development
Total
Potential DC Recoverable Cost
Page 6-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
6. Development Charge Calculation
Table 6-1 calculates the proposed uniform D.C.s to be imposed on anticipated
development in the Town for services based upon an urban buildout horizon. Table 6-2
calculates the proposed D.C.s to be imposed for services constructed to facilitate the
Town’s development over a 10-year planning horizon. Note services related to a
highway and fire services are calculated on a buildout planning horizon, however the
buildout planning horizon is assumed to be 10 years.
The calculation for residential development is generated on a per capita basis and is
based upon four forms of housing types (single and semi-detached, apartments 2+
bedrooms, apartment’s bachelor and 1 bedroom, and all other multiples). The non-
residential D.C. has been calculated on a per sq.ft. of gross floor area basis for non-
residential development (Commercial, Institutional and Industrial).
The D.C. eligible costs for each service component were developed in Chapter 5 for all
Town services, based on their proposed capital programs.
For the residential calculations, the total cost is divided by the “gross” (new resident)
population to determine the per capita amount. The eligible D.C. cost calculations set
out in Chapter 5 are based on the net anticipated population increase (the forecast new
unit population less the anticipated decline in existing units). The cost per capita is then
multiplied by the average occupancy of the new units (Appendix A, Schedule 3 & 4) to
calculate the charge in Tables 6-1 and 6-2.
With respect to non-residential development, based on recent Council direction to
attract industrial developments to the Town, the total costs are allocated to non-
residential development and varied into two categories, industrial and non-industrial.
These varied rates are based on forecasted industrial vs. non-industrial employment
relative to total employment. These costs are then divided by the respective
anticipated development over the planning period to calculate a cost per sq.ft. of gross
floor area for each category (see Tables 6-1 and 6-2).
Table 6-3 summarizes the total development charge that is applicable for municipal-
wide and area-specific services. Table 6-4 summarizes the gross capital expenditures
and sources of revenue for works to be undertaken during the 5-year life of the by-law.
Page 6-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
2016 $ DC Eligible Cost 2016 $ DC Eligible Cost
SERVICE Residential Non-Residential SDU per ft² Industrial Non-Industrial
Industrial
per ft2
Non-Industrial
per ft2
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
1. Stormwater Drainage and Control Services
1.1 Channels, drainage and ponds 410,043 191,054 320 0.31 22,217 168,837 0.16 0.36
410,043 191,054 320 0.31 22,217 168,837 0.16 0.36
2. Wastewater Services
2.1 Sewers - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
3. Water Services
3.1 Distribution systems 721,214 137,374 563 0.23 15,974 121,400 0.12 0.26
721,214 137,374 563 0.23 15,974 121,400 0.12 0.26
TOTAL $1,131,256 $328,428 $883 0.54 $38,191 $290,237 0.28 0.62
DC ELIGIBLE CAPITAL COST $1,131,256 $328,428 $38,191 $290,237
Build out Gross Population / GFA Growth (ft².) 4,049 609,108 138,320 470,788
Cost Per Capita / Non-Residential GFA (ft².) $279.39 $0.54 $0.28 $0.62
By Residential Unit Type p.p.u
Single and Semi-Detached Dwelling 3.16 $883
Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + 1.88 $525
Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom 1.25 $349
Other Multiples 2.13 $595
TABLE 6-1
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE CALCULATION
Urban Area Services
2016-Urban Buildout
2016 $ DC Eligible Cost2016 $ DC Eligible Cost
Page 6-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
2016 $ DC Eligible Cost 2016 $ DC Eligible Cost
SERVICE Residential Non-Residential SDU per ft² Industrial Non-Industrial
Industrial
per ft2
Non-Industrial
per ft2
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
4. Services Related to a Highway and Related Infrastructure
4.1 Roads 11,537,638 2,749,019 8,638 4.42 329,647 2,419,372 2.27 5.07
4.2 Depots and Domes 464,319 110,631 349 0.18 13,266 97,365 0.09 0.20
4.3 PW Rolling Stock 496,001 118,180 372 0.19 14,171 104,008 0.10 0.22
12,497,957 2,977,830 9,358 4.79 357,084 2,620,745 2.46 5.49
5. Fire Protection Services
5.1 Fire facilities 506,737 120,738 380 0.19 14,478 106,260 0.10 0.22
5.2 Fire vehicles 478,411 113,989 358 0.18 13,669 100,320 0.09 0.21
5.3 Small equipment and gear 58,711 13,989 44 0.02 1,677 12,311 0.01 0.03
1,043,859 248,715 782 0.39 29,825 218,891 0.20 0.46
6. Parking Services
6.1 Municipal parking spaces 49,917 11,894 37 0.02 1,426 10,467 0.01 0.02
49,917 11,894 37 0.02 1,426 10,467 0.01 0.02
7. Indoor and Outdoor Recreation Services
7.1
Parkland development, amenities & trails,
vehicles & indoor facilities 6,450,502 339,500 4,831 0.55 40,711 298,789 0.28 0.63
8. Library Services
8.1 Library facilities 807,975 42,525 605 0.07 5,099 37,426 0.03 0.08
8.2 Library materials 222,300 11,700 166 0.02 1,403 10,297 0.01 0.02
1,030,275 54,225 771 0.09 6,502 47,723 0.04 0.10
9. Administration
9.1 Studies 263,149 62,699 197 0.10 7,519 55,181 0.05 0.12
TOTAL $21,335,660 $3,694,863 $15,976 $5.94 $443,067 $3,251,796 3.04 6.82
DC ELIGIBLE CAPITAL COST $21,335,660 $3,694,863 $443,067 $3,251,796
10 Year Gross Population / GFA Growth (ft².) 4,220 623,213 145,600 477,613
Cost Per Capita / Non-Residential GFA (ft².) $5,055.84 $5.94 $3.04 $6.82
By Residential Unit Type p.p.u
Single and Semi-Detached Dwelling 3.16 $15,976
Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + 1.88 $9,505
Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom 1.25 $6,320
Other Multiples 2.13 $10,769
2016 $ DC Eligible Cost
TABLE 6-2
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE CALCULATION
Municipal-wide Services
2016-2025
2016 $ DC Eligible Cost
Page 6-4
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
2016 $ DC Eligible Cost 2016 $ DC Eligible Cost
Residential Non-Residential SDU per ft² Industrial Non-Industrial
Industrial
per ft2Non-Industrial
per ft2
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Urban-wide Services $1,131,256 $328,428 $883 $0.54 $38,191 $290,237 $0.28 $0.62
Municipal-wide Services 21,335,660 3,694,863 15,976 5.94 443,067 3,251,796 $3.04 $6.82
TOTAL 22,466,917 4,023,291 16,859 6.48 481,258 3,542,033 $3.32 $7.44
2016 $ DC Eligible Cost 2016 $ DC Eligible Cost
TABLE 6-3
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE CALCULATION
TOTAL ALL SERVICES
Page 6-5
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Table 6-4
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
GROSS EXPENDITURE AND SOURCES OF REVENUE SUMMARY
FOR COSTS TO BE INCURRED OVER THE LIFE OF THE BY-LAW
OTHER
DEDUCTIONS
BENEFIT TO
EXISTINGOTHER FUNDING
LEGISLATED
REDUCTIONRESIDENTIAL
NON-
RESIDENTIAL
1. Stormwater Drainage and Control Services
1.1 Channels, drainage and ponds 900,000 0 0 0 0 0 613,942 286,058
2. Wastewater Services
2.1 Sewers 709,000 0 0 0 0 0 595,560 113,440
3. Water Services
3.1 Distribution systems 1,302,800 0 599,550 0 0 0 590,730 112,520
4. Services Related to a Highway and Related Infrastructure
4.1 Roads 19,386,615 0 2,304,500 2,700,000 0 0 11,614,728 2,767,387
4.2 Depots and Domes 1,430,000 0 544,000 0 0 0 715,517 170,483
4.3 PW Rolling Stock 681,800 0 0 0 0 0 550,609 131,191
5. Fire Protection Services
5.1 Fire facilities 8,834,481 4,427,950 3,393,150 0 0 0 818,388 194,993
5.2 Fire vehicles 3,104,000 2,511,600 0 0 0 0 478,411 113,989
5.3 Small equipment and gear 286,000 148,900 0 0 0 0 110,719 26,381
6. Parking Services
6.1 Municipal parking spaces 247,000 0 24,700 0 14,270 79,600 103,718 24,712
7. Indoor and Outdoor Recreation Services
7.1 Parkland development, amenities & trails, vehicles & indoor facilities 9,778,250 0 1,932,900 0 784,154 3,813 6,704,515 352,869
8. Library Services
8.1 Library facilities 472,500 0 0 0 47,250 0 403,988 21,263
8.2 Library materials 130,000 0 0 0 13,000 0 111,150 5,850
9. Administration
9.1 Studies 881,700 0 216,660 0 42,117 0 503,061 119,862
TOTAL EXPENDITURES & REVENUES $48,144,146 $7,088,450 $9,015,460 $2,700,000 $900,790 $83,413 $23,915,036 $4,440,998
POST DC PERIOD
BENEFIT
TOTAL GROSS
COSTSERVICE
SOURCES OF FINANCING
TAX BASE OR OTHER NON-DC SOURCE DC RESERVE FUND
Page 7-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
7. Development Charge Policy Recommendations and Development Charge By-law Rules
7.1 Introduction
s.s.5(1)9 states that rules must be developed:
“...to determine if a development charge is payable in any particular case and to determine the amount of the charge, subject to the limitations set out in subsection 6.”
Paragraph 10 of the section goes on to state that the rules may provide for exemptions,
phasing in and/or indexing of D.C.s.
s.s.5(6) establishes the following restrictions on the rules:
the total of all D.C.s that would be imposed on anticipated development must not
exceed the capital costs determined under 5(1) 2-8 for all services involved;
if the rules expressly identify a type of development, they must not provide for it
to pay D.C.s that exceed the capital costs that arise from the increase in the
need for service for that type of development; however, this requirement does not
relate to any particular development; and
if the rules provide for a type of development to have a lower development
charge than is allowed, the rules for determining D.C.s may not provide for any
resulting shortfall to be made up via other development.
With respect to “the rules,” Section 6 states that a D.C. by-law must expressly address
the matters referred to above re s.s.5(1) para. 9 and 10, as well as how the rules apply
to the redevelopment of land.
The rules provided are based on the Town’s existing policies; however, there are items
under consideration at this time and these may be refined prior to adoption of the by-
law.
7.2 Development Charge By-law Structure
Bill 73 has introduced two new sections where Council must consider the use of area
specific charges:
Page 7-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
1) Section 2(9) of the Act now requires a municipality to implement area specific
D.C.s for either specific services which are prescribed and/or for specific
municipalities which are to be regulated. (Note that at this time, no municipalities
or services are prescribed by the Regulations.)
2) Section 10(2) c.1 of the D.C.A. requires that “the development charges
background study shall include consideration of the use of more than one
development charge by-law to reflect different needs for services in different
areas.”
With regard to the first item, there are no services or specific municipalities identified in
the regulations which must be area rated. The second item requires Council to consider
the use of area rating.
In past D.C. studies, consideration has been given to area rating; however, there have
been several reasons why this has not been imposed:
1. All Town services, with the exception of water, wastewater and stormwater,
require that the average 10-year service standard be calculated. This average
service standard multiplied by growth in the Town, establishes an upper ceiling
on the amount of funds which can be collected from all developing landowners.
Section 4(4) of O. Reg. 82/98 provides that “…if a development charge by-law
applies to a part of the municipality, the level of service and average level of
service cannot exceed that which would be determined if the by-law applied to
the whole municipality.” Put in layman’s terms, the average service standard
multiplied by the growth within the specific area, would establish an area-specific
ceiling which would significantly reduce the total revenue recoverable for the
Town hence potentially resulting in D.C. revenue shortfalls and impacts on
property taxes.
2. Extending on item 1, attempting to impose an area charge potentially causes
equity issues in transitioning from a Town-wide approach to an area specific
approach. For example, if all services were now built (and funded) within Area A
(which is 75% built out) and this was funded with some revenues from Areas B
and C, moving to an area rating approach would see Area A contribute no funds
to the costs of services in Areas B & C. The development charges would be
lower in Area A (as all services are now funded) and higher in Areas B and C.
As well, funding shortfalls may then potentially encourage the municipality to
provide less services to Areas B and C due to reduced revenue.
Page 7-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
3. Many services which are provided (roads, indoor and outdoor recreation
services, and library) are not restricted to one specific area and are often used by
all residents. For example, arenas located in different parts of the Town will be
used by residents from all areas depending on the programing of the facility (i.e.
a public skate is available each night, but at a different arena; hence usage of
any one facility at any given time is based on programing availability).
Therefore, it is recommended that:
a uniform municipal-wide development charge be calculated for all municipal
services, except for water, wastewater, and stormwater, which will be calculated
based on growth in the urban area; and
one municipal development charge by-law be used for all services.
7.3 Development Charge By-law Rules
The following subsections set out the recommended rules governing the calculation,
payment and collection of D.C.s in accordance with Section 6 of the D.C.A.
It is recommended that the following sections provide the basis for the
development charges:
7.3.1 Payment in any Particular Case
In accordance with the D.C.A., s.2(2), a development charge be calculated, payable and
collected where the development requires one or more of the following:
a) the passing of a zoning by-law or of an amendment to a zoning by-law under
section 34 of the Planning Act;
b) the approval of a minor variance under Section 45 of the Planning Act;
c) a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under section 50(7) of the
Planning Act applies;
d) the approval of a plan of subdivision under Section 51 of the Planning Act;
e) a consent under Section 53 of the Planning Act;
f) the approval of a description under section 50 of the Condominium Act; or
g) the issuing of a building permit under the Building Code Act in relation to a
building or structure.
Page 7-4
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
7.3.2 Determination of the Amount of the Charge
The following conventions be adopted:
1) Costs allocated to residential uses will be assigned to different types of
residential units based on the average occupancy for each housing type
constructed during the previous decade. Costs allocated to non-residential uses
will be assigned to industrial and non-industrial uses based on the amount of
square feet of gross floor area constructed.
2) Costs allocated to residential and non-residential uses are based upon a number
of conventions, as may be suited to each municipal circumstance, e.g.
for Administration, the costs have been based on a population vs.
employment growth ratio (81%/19%) for residential and non-residential,
respectively) over the 10-year forecast period;
for Indoor and Outdoor Recreation, and Library services, a 5% non-
residential attribution has been made to recognize use by the non-
residential sector;
for Services Related to a Highway and Related Infrastructure and Fire
Protection Services, the costs have been based on a population vs.
employment growth ratio (81%/19%) for residential and non-residential,
respectively over the buildout forecast period;
for Water and Wastewater Services, the costs have been based on design
flows (84%/16%) for residential and non-residential developments over the
urban buildout forecast period; and
for Stormwater Services, the costs have been split between residential
and non-residential based on benefitting land area (68%/32%).
7.3.3 Application to Redevelopment of Land (Demolition and Conversion)
If a development involves the demolition of and replacement of a building or structure
on the same site, or the conversion from one principal use to another, the developer
shall be allowed a credit equivalent to:
1) the number of dwelling units demolished/converted multiplied by the applicable
residential development charge in place at the time the development charge is
payable; and/or
Page 7-5
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
2) the gross floor area of the building demolished/converted multiplied by the
current non-residential development charge in place at the time the development
charge is payable.
The demolition credit is allowed only if the land was improved by occupied structures
and if the demolition permit related to the site was issued less than 48 months prior to
the issuance of a building permit. The credit can, in no case, exceed the amount of
D.C.s that would otherwise be payable.
7.3.4 Exemptions (full or partial)
a) Statutory exemptions
industrial building additions of up to and including 50% of the existing
gross floor area (defined in O.Reg. 82/98, s.1) of the building; for industrial
building additions which exceed 50% of the existing gross floor area, only
the portion of the addition in excess of 50% is subject to development
charges (s.4(3)) of the D.C.A.;
buildings or structures owned by and used for the purposes of any
municipality, local board or Board of Education (s.3);
residential development that results only in the enlargement of an existing
dwelling unit, or that results only in the creation of up to two additional
dwelling units (based on prescribed limits set out in s.2 of O.Reg. 82/98).
b) Non-statutory exemptions
Bona fide farm (non-residential) buildings including wholesale greenhouse
facilities and structures; and
Development creating or adding an accessory use or accessory structure
not exceeding 10 square metres of gross floor area.
7.3.5 Phasing in
No provisions for phasing in the development charge are provided in the development
charge by-law.
7.3.6 Timing of Collection
The development charge for all services shall be collected at the time of issuance of the
first building permit, subject to early or late payment agreements entered into by the
Town and an owner under section 27 of the D.C.A.
Page 7-6
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
7.3.7 Indexing
Indexing of the development charges shall be implemented on a mandatory basis
annually, commencing on the first anniversary date of this by-law and each anniversary
date thereafter, in accordance with the Statistics Canada Quarterly, Non-Residential
Building Construction Price Index (CANSIM Table 327-0043)1 for the most recent year-
over-year period.
7.4 Other Development Charge By-law Provisions
It is recommended that:
7.4.1 Categories of Services for Reserve Fund and Credit Purposes
The Town’s development charge collections are currently reserved in eleven (11)
separate reserve funds: Services Related to a Highway, Other Transportation Services,
Parking, Fire Protection Services, Outdoor Recreation Services, Indoor Recreation
Services, Library Services, Administration, Stormwater Drainage and Control Services,
Wastewater Services, and Water Services. It is recommended that the Town move
forward with nine (9) reserve funds by utilizing the following actions:
Combine the Other Transportation Services reserve fund and the Services
Related to a Highway reserve fund and rename the reserve “Services Related to
a Highway and Related Infrastructure”; and
Combine the Indoor and Outdoor Recreation Services reserve funds.
Appendix D outlines the reserve fund policies that the Town is required to follow as per
the D.C.A.
7.4.2 By-law In-force Date
A by-law under the D.C.A. comes into force on the day after which the by-law is passed
by Council.
1 O.Reg 82/98 referenced “The Statistics Canada Quarterly, Construction Price Statistics, catalogue number 62-007” as the index source. As of the end of December, 2013 this catalogue has been discontinued and replaced by this web based table.
Page 7-7
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
7.4.3 Minimum Interest Rate Paid on Refunds and Charged for Inter-Reserve
Fund Borrowing
The minimum interest rate is the Bank of Canada rate on the day on which the by-law
comes into force (as per s.11 of O.Reg. 82/98).
7.5 Other Recommendations
It is recommended that Council:
“Whenever appropriate, request that grants, subsidies and other contributions be
clearly designated by the donor as being to the benefit of existing development or
new development, as applicable;”
“Adopt the assumptions contained herein as an ‘anticipation’ with respect to
capital grants, subsidies and other contributions;”
“Approve the capital project listing set out in Chapter 5 of the Development
Charges Background Study dated September 1, 2016, subject to further annual
review during the capital budget process;”
“Approve the Development Charges Background Study dated September 1,
2016, as amended (if applicable);"
“Approve the use of a uniform municipal-wide residential charge (which varies by
unit type), for all services except for water, wastewater, and stormwater, as
opposed to the use of an area rating;”
“Approve the use of a uniform municipal-wide Industrial charge, for all services
except for water, wastewater, and stormwater, as opposed to the use of an area
rating;”
“Approve the use of a uniform municipal-wide Non-Industrial charge, for all
services except for water, wastewater, and stormwater, as opposed to the use of
an area rating;”
“Determine that no further public meeting is required;” and
“Approve the Development Charge By-law as set out in Appendix G.”
Page 8-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
8. By-law Implementation
8.1 Public Consultation Process
8.1.1 Introduction
This chapter addresses the mandatory, formal public consultation process (Section
8.1.2), as well as the optional, informal consultation process (Section 8.1.3). The latter
is designed to seek the co-operation and participation of those involved, in order to
produce the most suitable policy. Section 8.1.4 addresses the anticipated impact of the
development charge on development from a generic viewpoint.
8.1.2 Public Meeting of Council
Section 12 of the D.C.A., indicates that before passing a development charge by-law,
Council must hold at least one public meeting, giving at least 20 clear days’ notice
thereof, in accordance with the Regulation. Council must also ensure that the proposed
by-law and background report are made available to the public at least sixty (60) days
prior to by-law passage.
Any person who attends such a meeting may make representations related to the
proposed by-law.
If a proposed by-law is changed following such a meeting, Council must determine
whether a further meeting (under this section) is necessary (i.e. if the proposed by-law
which is proposed for adoption has been changed in any respect, Council should
formally consider whether an additional public meeting is required, incorporating this
determination as part of the final by-law or associated resolution. It is noted that
Council’s decision, once made, is final and not subject to review by a Court or the
Ontario Municipal Board (O.M.B.).
8.1.3 Other Consultation Activity
There are three broad groupings of the public who are generally the most concerned
with Town development charge policy:
1. The first grouping is the residential development community, consisting of land
developers and builders, who are typically responsible for generating the majority
of the development charge revenues. Others, such as realtors, are directly
impacted by development charge policy. They are, therefore, potentially
interested in all aspects of the charge, particularly the quantum by unit type,
Page 8-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
projects to be funded by the D.C. and the timing thereof, and Town policy with
respect to development agreements, D.C. credits and front-ending requirements.
2. The second public grouping embraces the public at large and includes taxpayer
coalition groups and others interested in public policy.
3. The third grouping is the industrial/commercial/institutional development sector,
consisting of land developers and major owners or organizations with significant
construction plans, such as hotels, entertainment complexes, shopping centres,
offices, industrial buildings and institutions. Also involved are organizations such
as Industry Associations, the Chamber of Commerce, the Board of Trade and the
Economic Development Agencies, who are all potentially interested in Town
development charge policy. Their primary concern is frequently with the
quantum of the charge, gross floor area exclusions such as basements,
mechanical or indoor parking areas, or exemptions and phase-in or capping
provisions in order to moderate the impact.
8.2 Anticipated Impact of the Charge on Development
The establishment of sound development charge policy often requires the achievement
of an acceptable balance between two competing realities. The first is that high non-
residential development charges can, to some degree, represent a barrier to increased
economic activity and sustained industrial/commercial growth, particularly for capital
intensive uses. Also, in many cases, increased residential development charges can
ultimately be expected to be recovered via higher housing prices and can impact project
feasibility in some cases (e.g. rental apartments).
On the other hand, development charges or other Town capital funding sources need to
be obtained in order to help ensure that the necessary infrastructure and amenities are
installed. The timely installation of such works is a key initiative in providing adequate
service levels and in facilitating strong economic growth, investment and wealth
generation.
8.3 Implementation Requirements
8.3.1 Introduction
Once the Town has calculated the charge, prepared the complete background study,
carried out the public process and passed a new by-law, the emphasis shifts to
implementation matters.
Page 8-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
These include notices, potential appeals and complaints, credits, front-ending
agreements, subdivision agreement conditions and finally the collection of revenues and
funding of projects.
The sections which follow overview the requirements in each case.
8.3.2 Notice of Passage
In accordance with s.13 of the D.C.A., when a D.C. by-law is passed, the Town clerk
shall give written notice of the passing and of the last day for appealing the by-law (the
day that is 40 days after the day it was passed). Such notice must be given no later
than 20 days after the day the by-law is passed (i.e. as of the day of newspaper
publication or the mailing of the notice).
Section 10 of O.Reg. 82/98 further defines the notice requirements which are
summarized as follows:
notice may be given by publication in a newspaper which is (in the Clerk’s
opinion) of sufficient circulation to give the public reasonable notice, or by
personal service, fax or mail to every owner of land in the area to which the by-
law relates;
s.s.10(4) lists the persons/organizations who must be given notice; and
s.s.10(5) lists the eight items which the notice must cover.
8.3.3 By-law Pamphlet
In addition to the “notice” information, the Town must prepare a “pamphlet” explaining
each development charge by-law in force, setting out:
a description of the general purpose of the development charges;
the “rules” for determining if a charge is payable in a particular case and for
determining the amount of the charge;
the services to which the development charges relate; and
a general description of the general purpose of the Treasurer’s statement and
where it may be received by the public.
Where a by-law is not appealed to the O.M.B., the pamphlet must be readied within 60
days after the by-law comes into force. Later dates apply to appealed by-laws.
The Town must give one copy of the most recent pamphlet without charge, to any
person who requests one.
Page 8-4
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
8.3.4 Appeals
Sections 13-19 of the D.C.A., set out the requirements relative to making and
processing a D.C. by-law appeal and O.M.B. Hearing in response to an appeal. Any
person or organization may appeal a D.C. by-law to the O.M.B. by filing a notice of
appeal with the Town clerk, setting out the objection to the by-law and the reasons
supporting the objection. This must be done by the last day for appealing the by-law,
which is 40 days after the by-law is passed.
The Town is carrying out a public consultation process in order to address the issues
that come forward as part of that process, thereby avoiding or reducing the need for an
appeal to be made.
8.3.5 Complaints
A person required to pay a development charge, or his agent, may complain to the
Town Council imposing the charge that:
the amount of the charge was incorrectly determined;
the reduction to be used against the development charge was incorrectly
determined; or
there was an error in the application of the development charge.
Sections 20-25 of the D.C.A., set out the requirements that exist, including the fact that
a complaint may not be made later than 90 days after a D.C. (or any part of it) is
payable. A complainant may appeal the decision of Town Council to the O.M.B.
8.3.6 Credits
Sections 38-41 of the D.C.A., set out a number of credit requirements, which apply
where a Town agrees to allow a person to perform work in the future that relates to a
service in the D.C. by-law.
These credits would be used to reduce the amount of D.C.s to be paid. The value of
the credit is limited to the reasonable cost of the work which does not exceed the
average level of service. The credit applies only to the service to which the work
relates, unless the Town agrees to expand the credit to other services for which a
development charge is payable.
Page 8-5
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
8.3.7 Front-Ending Agreements
The Town and one or more landowners may enter into a front-ending agreement which
provides for the costs of a project which will benefit an area in the Town to which the
D.C. by-law applies. Such an agreement can provide for the costs to be borne by one
or more parties to the agreement who are, in turn, reimbursed in future by persons who
develop land defined in the agreement.
Part III of the D.C.A., (Sections 44-58) addresses front-ending agreements and removes
some of the obstacles to their use which were contained in the D.C.A., 1989.
Accordingly, the Town assesses whether this mechanism is appropriate for its use, as
part of funding projects prior to Town funds being available.
8.3.8 Severance and Subdivision Agreement Conditions
Section 59 of the D.C.A., prevents a Municipality from imposing directly or indirectly, a
charge related to development or a requirement to construct a service related to
development, by way of a condition or agreement under s.51 or s.53 of the Planning
Act, except for:
“local services, related to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the
plan relates, to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval
under section 51 of the Planning Act;” and
“local services to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval
under Section 53 of the Planning Act.”
It is also noted that s.s.59(4) of the D.C.A. requires that the municipal approval authority
for a draft plan of subdivision under s.s.51(31) of the Planning Act, use its power to
impose conditions to ensure that the first purchaser of newly subdivided land is
informed of all the development charges related to the development, at the time the land
is transferred.
In this regard, if the Town in question is a commenting agency, in order to comply with
subsection 59(4) of the D.C.A. it would need to provide to the approval authority,
information regarding the applicable Town development charges related to the site.
If the Town is an approval authority for the purposes of section 51 of the Planning Act, it
would be responsible to ensure that it collects information from all entities which can
impose a development charge.
Page 8-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
The most effective way to ensure that purchasers are aware of this condition would be
to require it as a provision in a registered subdivision agreement, so that any purchaser
of the property would be aware of the charges at the time the title was searched prior to
closing a transaction conveying the lands.
Page A-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Appendix A – Background Information on
Residential and Non-residential Growth
Forecast
Singles & Semi-
Detached
Multiple
Dwellings2 Apartments
3 OtherTotal
Households
Person Per
Unit (PPU)
Mid 1996 19,585 20,260 5,520 645 650 10 6,825 2.87
Mid 2001 21,297 22,030 6,095 865 620 5 7,585 2.81
Mid 2006 23,937 24,760 6,525 1,420 765 30 8,740 2.74
Mid 2011 25,325 26,200 7,070 1,645 860 40 9,615 2.63
Mid 2016 27,281 28,220 7,462 2,115 983 40 10,600 2.57
Mid 2021 29,327 30,330 7,580 2,342 1,810 40 11,772 2.49
Mid 2026 (Buildout) 31,201 32,270 7,692 2,557 2,593 40 12,882 2.42
Mid 1996 - Mid 2001 1,712 1,770 575 220 -30 -5 760
Mid 2001 - Mid 2006 2,640 2,730 430 555 145 25 1,155
Mid 2006 - Mid 2011 1,388 1,440 545 225 95 10 875
Mid 2011 - Mid 2016 1,956 2,020 392 470 123 0 985
Mid 2016 - Mid 2021 2,046 2,110 118 227 827 0 1,172
Mid 2016 - Mid 2026 (Buildout) 3,920 4,050 230 442 1,610 0 2,282
Source: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2016.
1. Census Undercount estimated at approximately 4%. Note: Population Including the Undercount has been rounded.
2. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes.
3. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments.
Source: Historical housing activity (2006-2015) based on Statistics Canada building permits, Catalogue 64-001-XIB
1. Growth Forecast represents start year.
SCHEDULE 1
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
RESIDENTIAL GROWTH FORECAST SUMMARY
Population
(Excluding
Census
Undercount)
Population
(Including
Census
Undercount)¹
Year
Housing Units
73
209
152
116
185
230
78
290
255
132
232 235 235 235 235
222 222 222 222 222
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Ho
usin
g U
nit
s
Years
HOUSING FORECAST¹
Historical Low Density Medium Density High Density Historical Average
Source: Historical housing activity (2006‐2015) based on Statistics Canada building permits, Catalogue 64‐001‐XIB
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 02/08/2016H:\Grimsby\2016 DC Amendment\Growth\
Grimsby Growth Model Revised for 2016
Page A-2
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
ESTIMATE OF THE ANTICIPATED AMOUNT, TYPE AND LOCATION OF
DEVELOPMENT FOR WHICH DEVELOPMENT CHARGES CAN BE IMPOSED
2016- 2026 (Buildout) 176 442 1,610 2,228 4,049 (270) 3,779
2016- 2026 (Buildout) 54 - - 54 171 (30) 141
2016- 2026 (Buildout) 230 442 1,610 2,282 4,220 (300) 3,920
1. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes.
2. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments.
SCHEDULE 2
DEVELOPMENT TIMING TOTAL
GROSS
POPULATION EXISTING UNIT NET
Urban
Rural
LOCATION RESIDENTIAL
UNITS
SINGLES & SEMI-
DETACHEDMULTIPLES
1
Source: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2016
Town of Grimsby
Residential distribution based on a combination of historical permit activity, available housing supply and discussions with Town of Grimsby staff regarding future development prospects.
APARTMENTS2
IN NEW UNITSPOPULATION
CHANGE
POPULATION
INCREASE
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 02/08/2016
H:\Grimsby\2016 DC Amendment\Growth\
Grimsby Growth Model Revised for 2016
Page A-3
POPULATION
Mid 2011 Population 25,325
Occupants of Units (2) 985
New Housing Units, multiplied by persons per unit (3) 2.47
Mid 2011 to Mid 2016 gross population increase 2,433 2,433
Decline in Housing Units (4) 9,615
Unit Occupancy, multiplied by ppu decline rate (5) -0.0496
Mid 2011 to Mid 2016 total decline in population -477 -477
Population Estimate to Mid 2016 27,281
Net Population Increase, Mid 2011 to Mid 2016 1,956
(1) 2011 population based on StatsCan Census unadjusted for Census Undercount.
(2)
(3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be:
Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons
Structural Type Per Unit¹ of Estimated Units² Per Unit Average
Singles & Semi Detached 3.16 40% 1.26
Multiples (6) 2.13 48% 1.02
Apartments (7) 1.59 12% 0.20
Total 100% 2.47
¹ Based on 2011 Census custom database
² Based on Building permit/completion acitivty
(4) 2011 households taken from StatsCan Census.
(5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and
changing economic conditions.
(6) Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes.
(7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments.
SCHEDULE 3
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
CURRENT YEAR GROWTH FORECAST
MID 2011 TO MID 2016
Estimated residential units constructed, Mid 2011 to the beginning of the growth period, assuming a six month lag between
construction and occupancy.
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 02/08/2016H:\Grimsby\2016 DC Amendment\Growth\
Grimsby Growth Model Revised for 2016
Page A-4
POPULATION
Mid 2016 Population 27,281
Occupants of Units (2) 2,282
New Housing Units, multiplied by persons per unit (3) 1.85
Mid 2016 to Mid 2026 gross population increase 4,220 4,220
Decline in Housing Units (4) 12,660
Unit Occupancy, multiplied by ppu decline rate (5) -0.0237
Mid 2016 to Mid 2026 total decline in population -300 -300
Population Estimate to Mid 2026 31,201
Net Population Increase, Mid 2016 to Mid 2026 3,920
(1) Mid 2016 Population based on:
(2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy.
(3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be:
Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons
Structural Type Per Unit¹ of Estimated Units² Per Unit Average
Singles & Semi Detached 3.16 10% 0.32
Multiples (6) 2.13 19% 0.41
Apartments (7) 1.59 71% 1.12
one bedroom or less 1.25
two bedrooms or more 1.88
Total 100% 1.85
¹ Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2011 Census database.
² Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process.
(4) Mid 2016 households based upon 9,615 (2011 Census) + 985 (Mid 2011 to Mid 2016 unit estimate) = 10,600
(5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions.
(6) Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes.
(7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments.
MID 2016 TO MID 2026 (BUILDOUT)
2011 Population (25,325) + Mid 2011 to Mid 2016 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (985 x 2.47 = 2,433) +
(9,615 x -0.0496 = -477) = 27,281
SCHEDULE 4
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
TEN YEAR GROWTH FORECAST
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 02/08/2016H:\Grimsby\2016 DC Amendment\Growth\
Grimsby Growth Model Revised for 2016
Page A-5
SCHEDULE 5
SUMMARY OF RESIDENTIAL LAND SUPPLY- URBAN
By Status
Stage of Development
and Low Medium High
Plan/Owner Density1
Density2
Density3
Total
21 Beverly Street 3 3
26 Bedford Park Condos 6 6
31 Main Street East at Brook Road 4 4
35 Lake Street at Town Boundary 1 1
Various Existing Vacant Lots 25 25
Registered But Not Built Sub-total 39 - - 39
% Allocation 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
15 Main at to Doran 4 4
22 Main Street at Nelles 14 14
25 Phelps Central Avenue 87 87
Draft Approval & Preliminary Plans Sub-total - 101 4 105
% Allocation 0.0% 96.2% 3.8% 100.0%
20 Main at Cemetery Road 18 18
Unapproved Applications - 18 - 18
% Allocation 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Other Lands
3 Winston Oaks West Side 92 92
4 Lakelawn North Service Road 130 130
5 Place Polonaise 193 226 419
6 Concorde Place 317 317
7 Fifth Wheel 90 600 690
10 North Service Road at Olive Street 2 2
11 Beside Jordan Heights 3 3
14 Slessor Boulevard 8 48 56
17 Bowling Alley 35 35
18 Forans Marina 32 32
22 Main Street at Nelles 26 26
23 Lake Street at Sewage TP 16 16
27 Main Street at Teeter 4 4
28 Bartlett at Main 25 25
29 Bartlett at Central 20 20
30 Bartlett at Escarpment 20 20
31 Planet Niteclub 179 179
Draft Approval & Preliminary Plans Sub-total 137 323 1,606 2,066
% Allocation 6.6% 15.6% 77.7% 100.0%
Total Urban 176 442 1,610 2,228
% Allocation 7.9% 19.8% 72.3% 100.0%
Ma
p Id
1. Single-detached/semi-detached represents low-density.
Source: Town of Grimsby Planning Dept. May, 2016
2. Townhouses and apartments in duplex/triplex represents medium-density.
3. Apartments < or > 5 storeys represents high-density.
Unit Type
Registered Development
Draft Approval Development
Unapproved Applications
Page A-6
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS
Year Total
108 17 0 125
2006 73 0 0 73
2007 142 67 0 209
2008 92 60 0 152
2009 86 30 0 116
2010 137 48 0 185
Sub-total 530 205 0 735
Average (2006 - 2010) 106 41 0 147
% Breakdown 72.1% 27.9% 0.0% 100.0%
2011 78 152 0 230
2012 45 33 0 78
2013 57 197 36 290
2014 163 88 4 255
2015 49 0 83 132
Sub-total 392 470 123 985
Average (2011 - 2015) 78 94 25 197
% Breakdown 39.8% 47.7% 12.5% 100.0%
2006 - 2015
Total 922 675 123 1,720
Average 92 68 12 172
% Breakdown 53.6% 39.2% 7.2% 100.0%
Sources:
Building Permits - Statistics Canada Publication, 64-001XIB
1. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes.
2. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments.
Singles & Semi
DetachedMultiples
1Apartments
2
SCHEDULE 6
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
HISTORICAL RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS
2006-2015
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 02/08/2016H:\Grimsby\2016 DC Amendment\Growth\
Grimsby Growth Model Revised for 2016
Page A-7
Age of SINGLES AND SEMI-DETACHED
Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total Adjusted PPU¹ 10 Year Average
1-5 - - 2.000 3.068 - 3.096 3.06
6-10 - - - 3.330 - 3.292 3.26 3.16
11-15 - - 1.933 3.117 - 2.895 2.87
16-20 - - - 2.914 - 3.245 3.23
20-25 - - - 3.453 - 3.347 3.34
25-35 - - - 2.905 - 2.901 2.90
35+ 0.381 - 2.246 2.780 4.000 2.728 2.73
Total 0.667 - 2.191 2.942 4.079 2.892
Age of MULTIPLES2
Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total Adjusted PPU¹ 10 Year Average
1-5 - - 1.842 2.179 - 1.962 1.96
6-10 - - 2.128 2.421 - 2.293 2.29 2.13
11-15 - - 1.600 2.824 - 2.024 2.02
16-20 - - 1.158 2.353 - 1.730 1.73
20-25 - - - 2.192 - 2.241 2.24
25-35 - - - - - - -
35+ 0.333 - 3.636 4.471 - 2.473 2.47
Total 0.585 - 1.964 2.560 - 2.170
SCHEDULE 7a
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
PERSONS PER UNIT BY AGE AND TYPE OF DWELLING
(2011 CENSUS)
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 02/08/2016H:\Grimsby\2016 DC Amendment\Growth\
Grimsby Growth Model Revised for 2016
Page A-8
Age of SINGLES AND SEMI-DETACHED
Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total Adjusted PPU¹ 10 Year Average
1-5 - 1.621 2.010 3.058 4.164 2.887 2.83
6-10 - 2.214 2.060 3.173 3.672 3.050 3.02 2.92
11-15 - 2.143 1.876 2.988 4.188 2.889 2.87
16-20 - - 1.926 2.960 4.209 2.908 2.90
20-25 - 1.941 2.209 2.930 3.767 2.923 2.92
25-35 - 1.696 2.000 2.922 3.329 2.846 2.84
35+ 2.429 1.643 1.992 2.603 3.525 2.511 2.51
Total 2.194 1.681 1.995 2.726 3.648 2.631
Age of MULTIPLES2
Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total Adjusted PPU¹ 10 Year Average
1-5 - 1.400 1.663 2.383 - 2.069 1.96
6-10 - 1.520 1.846 2.273 - 1.988 1.94 1.95
11-15 - 1.333 1.621 2.545 - 1.977 1.95
16-20 - 1.900 1.790 2.761 - 2.373 2.36
20-25 - - 1.926 2.508 - 2.252 2.25
25-35 - 1.550 1.863 2.991 - 2.569 2.57
35+ 1.222 1.331 2.032 2.682 3.768 2.284 2.28
Total 0.712 1.378 1.891 2.631 4.566 2.234
Age of APARTMENTS3
Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total Adjusted PPU¹ 10 Year Average
1-5 0.818 1.192 1.587 3.429 - 1.516 1.52
6-10 - 1.421 1.513 - - 1.656 1.66 1.59
11-15 - 1.254 1.667 2.531 - 1.701 1.70
16-20 - 1.191 1.761 2.475 - 1.572 1.57
20-25 - 1.274 1.755 2.806 - 1.632 1.63
25-35 1.273 1.352 1.679 2.800 - 1.592 1.59
35+ 1.061 1.230 1.714 2.629 2.905 1.577 1.58
Total 1.029 1.241 1.710 2.667 2.905 1.585
Age of ALL DENSITY TYPES
Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total
1-5 1.818 1.319 1.851 2.946 4.138 2.602
6-10 - 1.678 1.918 3.079 3.667 2.816
11-15 - 1.411 1.758 2.920 4.012 2.599
16-20 - 1.307 1.808 2.897 4.176 2.480
20-25 - 1.335 1.906 2.887 3.611 2.610
25-35 1.000 1.398 1.786 2.920 3.440 2.496
35+ 1.573 1.318 1.906 2.606 3.499 2.338
Total 1.500 1.333 1.886 2.714 3.606 2.420
2. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes.
3. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments.
Note: Does not include Statistics Canada data classified as 'Other'
PPU Not calculated for samples less than or equal to 50 dwelling units, and does not include institutional population
SCHEDULE 7b
NIAGARA REGION
PERSONS PER UNIT BY AGE AND TYPE OF DWELLING
(2011 CENSUS)
1. The Census PPU has been adjusted to account for the downward PPU trend which has been recently experienced in both new and
older units, largely due to the aging of the population
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 02/08/2016H:\Grimsby\2016 DC Amendment\Growth\
Grimsby Growth Model Revised for 2016
Page A-9
3.103.29
2.90
3.24 3.35
2.902.73
2.07 1.99 1.98
2.372.25
2.57
2.28
1.521.66 1.70
1.57 1.63 1.59 1.58
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 20-25 25-35 35+
Pers
on
s P
er
Dw
ell
ing
Age of Dwelling
SCHEDULE 8
PERSONS PER UNIT BY STRUCTURAL TYPE AND AGE OF DWELLING (2011 CENSUS)
Singles and Semi-Detached Multiples Apartments
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
Apartment PPUs are based on Niagara Region.
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 02/08/2016H:\Grimsby\2016 DC Amendment\Growth\
Grimsby Growth Model Revised for 2016
Page A-10
Employment
2001 21,297 0.019 0.037 0.064 0.110 0.065 0.296 0.031 0.327 405 795 1,368 2,353 1,375 6,295 660 6,955 5,500
2006 23,937 0.013 0.044 0.076 0.118 0.058 0.308 0.031 0.340 300 1,065 1,820 2,815 1,380 7,380 750 8,130 6,315
2011 25,325 0.025 0.047 0.071 0.143 0.051 0.336 0.032 0.368 630 1,180 1,790 3,610 1,290 8,500 810 9,310 7,320
Mid 2016 27,281 0.021 0.046 0.072 0.148 0.061 0.348 0.034 0.373 560 1,241 1,910 3,930 1,609 9,251 938 10,189 8,009
Mid 2026 (Buildout) 31,201 0.019 0.046 0.065 0.147 0.057 0.334 0.032 0.365 560 1,435 2,022 4,583 1,778 10,379 998 11,377 8,944
2001 - 2006 2,640 -0.006 0.007 0.012 0.007 -0.007 0.013 0.000 0.013 -105 270 453 463 5 1,085 90 1,175 815
2006 - 2011 1,388 0.0123 0.0021 -0.0054 0.0249 -0.0067 0.0273 0.0007 0.0280 330 115 -30 795 -90 1,120 60 1,180 1,005
2011 - Mid 2016 1,956 -0.0036 -0.0011 0.0012 0.0056 0.0099 0.0119 0.0024 0.0059 -70 61 120 320 319 751 128 879 689
Mid 2016 - Mid 2026 (Buildout) 3,920 -0.0021 0.0005 -0.0071 -0.0012 -0.0038 -0.0136 -0.0024 -0.0088 0 194 112 653 169 1,128 60 1,188 934
2001 - 2006 528 -0.00130 0.00143 0.00236 0.00143 -0.00138 0.00255 0.00007 0.00261 -21 54 91 93 1 217 455 856 347
2006 - 2011 278 0.0025 0.0004 -0.0011 0.0050 -0.0013 0.0055 0.0001 0.0056 66 23 -6 159 -18 224 12 236 201
2011 - Mid 2016 652 -0.00119 -0.00036 0.00039 0.00185 0.00330 0.00398 0.00080 0.00195 -23 20 40 107 106 250 43 293 230
Mid 2016 - Mid 2026 (Buildout) 392 -0.00021 0.00005 -0.00071 -0.00012 -0.00038 -0.00136 -0.00024 -0.00088 0 19 11 65 17 113 6 119 93
Source: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2016.
1. Statistics Canada defines no fixed place of work (NFPOW) employees as "persons who do not go from home to the same work place location at the beginning of each shift". Such persons include building and landscape
contractors, travelling salespersons, independent truck drivers, etc.
Total (Excluding
NFPOW and Work
at Home)
Incremental Change
Annual Average
Employment
NFPOW1
Total
Including
NFPOW
NFPOW ¹Work at
HomeIndustrial
Commercial/
Population
Related
Institutional Total
Activity Rate
Total
Employment
(Including
NFPOW)
EMPLOYMENT FORECAST, 2016 TO BUILDOUT
SCHEDULE 9a
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
Period PopulationPrimary
Work at
HomeIndustrial
Commercial/
Population
Related
Institutional Total Primary
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 02/08/2016H:\Grimsby\2016 DC Amendment\Growth\
Grimsby Growth Model Revised for 2016
Page A-11
2001 21,297 405 1,368 2,353 1,375 5,500
2006 23,937 300 1,820 2,815 1,380 6,315
2011 25,325 630 1,790 3,610 1,290 7,320
Mid 2016 27,281 560 1,910 3,930 1,609 8,009 2,482,813 2,161,664 1,126,500 5,770,977
Mid 2026 (Buildout) 31,201 560 2,022 4,583 1,778 8,944 2,628,413 2,520,866 1,244,911 6,394,190
2001 - 2006 2,640 -105 453 463 5 815
2006 - 2011 1,388 330 -30 795 -90 1,005
2011 - Mid 2016 1,956 -70 120 320 319 689 155,813 176,164 223,500 555,477
Mid 2016 - Mid 2026 (Buildout) 3,920 0 112 653 169 934 145,600 359,202 118,411 623,213
2001 - 2006 528 -21 91 93 1 163
2006 - 2011 278 66 -6 159 -18 201
2011 - Mid 2016 652 -23 40 107 106 230 51,938 58,721 74,500 185,159
Mid 2016 - Mid 2026 (Buildout) 392 0 11 65 17 93 14,560 35,920 11,841 62,321
Source: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2016.
1. Square Foot Per Employee Assumptions
Industrial 1,300
Commercial/ Population Related 550
Institutional 700
Incremental Change
Annual Average
Industrial
Commercial/
Population
Related
Institutional Total Primary Industrial
Commercial/
Population
Related
Institutional Total
SCHEDULE 9b
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
EMPLOYMENT GROSS FLOOR AREA (GFA) FORECAST, 2011 TO BUILDOUT
Period Population
Employment Gross Floor Area in Square Feet (Estimated)¹
Page A-12
ESTIMATE OF THE ANTICIPATED AMOUNT, TYPE AND LOCATION OF
NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR WHICH DEVELOPMENT CHARGES CAN BE IMPOSED
2016- 2026 (Buildout) 138,320 352,377 118,411 609,108 915
2016- 2026 (Buildout) 7,280 6,825 - 14,105 19
2016- 2026 (Buildout) 145,600 359,202 118,411 623,213 934
1. Employment Increase does not include No Fixed Place of Work or Work at Home.
2. Square feet per employee assumptions:
Industrial 1,300
Commercial 550
Institututional 700
Town of Grimsby
Source: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2016
Rural
GFA S.F. GFA S.F. GFA S.F. GFA S.F. INCREASE1LOCATION
Urban
EMPLOYMENTDEVELOPMENT TIMING INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL TOTAL NON-RES
SCHEDULE 9c
Page A-13
New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total
Subtotal (2006-2010 2,037 4,957 2,522 9,516 23,777 7,883 5,971 37,632 35,641 569 8,419 44,628 61,455 13,409 16,913 91,776
Percentage of Total 21% 52% 27% 100% 63% 21% 16% 100% 80% 1% 19% 100% 67% 15% 18% 100%
Average(2006-2010) 407 991 504 1,903 4,755 1,577 1,194 7,526 7,128 114 1,684 8,926 12,291 2,682 3,383 18,355Subtotal (2011-2015 4,804 881 1,685 7,370 7,425 19,860 2,198 29,483 1,300 3,349 10,635 15,284 13,529 24,089 14,518 52,136
Percentage of Total 65% 12% 23% 100% 25% 67% 7% 100% 9% 22% 70% 100% 26% 46% 28% 100%
Average(2011-2016) 961 176 337 1,474 1,485 3,972 440 5,897 260 670 2,659 3,057 2,706 4,818 2,904 10,427
2006-2015
Period Total 12,574 85,556 88,073 186,203
2006-2015 Average 1,143 7,778 8,007 16,928% Breakdown 6.8% 45.9% 47.3% 100.0%
SOURCE: STATISTICS CANADA PUBLICATION, 64-001-XIB
Note: Inflated to year-end 2015 (January, 2016) dollars using Reed Construction Cost Index
SCHEDULE 10
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
NON-RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION VALUE
YEARS 2006 - 2015
(000's 2016$)
YEAR TotalInstitutionalIndustrial Commercial
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 02/08/2016H:\Grimsby\2016 DC Amendment\Growth\
Grimsby Growth Model Revised for 2016
Page A-14
1996 2001 2006 2011 96-01 01-06 06-11Comments
Employment by industry
1.0 Primary Industry Employment Categories which relate to
1.1 All primary 0 505 490 175 505 -15 -315 local land-based resources.
Sub-total 0 505 490 175 505 -15 -315
2.0 Industrial and Other Employment
2.1 Manufacturing 0 755 925 765 755 170 -160 Categories which relate
2.2 Wholesale trade 0 310 450 440 310 140 -10 primarily to industrial land
2.3 Construction 0 240 265 275 240 25 10 supply and demand.
2.4 Transportation, storage, communication and other utility 0 288 440 328 288 153 -113
Sub-total 0 1,593 2,080 1,808 1,593 488 -273
3.0 Population Related Employment
3.1 Retail trade 0 965 1,055 1,030 965 90 -25 Categories which relate
3.2 Finance, insurance, real estate operator and insurance agent 0 305 475 480 305 170 5 primarily to population
3.3 Business service 0 503 525 448 503 23 -78 growth within the
3.4 Accommodation, food and beverage and other service 0 890 1,250 1,110 890 360 -140 municipality.
Sub-total 0 2,663 3,305 3,068 2,663 643 -238
4.0 Institutional
4.1 Government Service 0 95 150 170 95 55 20
4.2 Education service, Health, Social Services 0 1,440 1,355 1,675 1,440 -85 320
Sub-total 0 1,535 1,505 1,845 1,535 -30 340
Total Employment 0 6,295 7,380 6,895 6,295 1,085 -485
Population 19,585 21,297 23,937 25,325 1,712 2,640
Employment to Population Ratio
Industrial and Other Employment 0.00 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.01
Population Related Employment 0.00 0.13 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.01
Institutional Employment 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.07 -0.01
Primary Industry Employment 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.00
Total 0.00 0.30 0.31 0.27 0.30 0.01
Source: Statistics Canada Employment by Place of Work
Note: 1996-2011 employment figures are classified by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code
SCHEDULE 11
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
EMPLOYMENT TO POPULATION RATIO BY MAJOR EMPLOYMENT SECTOR, 1996 TO 2011
Year Change
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 02/08/2016H:\Grimsby\2016 DC Amendment\Growth\
Grimsby Growth Model Revised for 2016
Page A-15
Page B-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Appendix B – Level of Service
Page B-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Cost (per capita)
Services Related to a Highway $6,741.30 0.0037 km of roadways 1,821,973 per lane km 26,425,896
Related Facilities $149.90 0.9812 ft² of building area 153 per ft² 587,608
Related Vehicles $158.86 0.0017 No. of vehicles and equipment 93,447 per vehicle 622,731
Fire Facilities $137.18 0.4597 ft² of building area 298 per ft² 537,746
Fire Vehicles $151.13 0.0003 No. of vehicles 503,767 per vehicle 592,430
Fire Small Equipment and Gear $18.55 0.0017 No. of equipment and gear 10,912 per Firefighter 72,716
Parking Services Parking Spaces $19.41 0.0063 No. of spaces 3,081 per space 76,087
Parkland Development $248.96 0.0040 No. of developed parkland acres 62,240 per acre 975,923
Parkland Amenities $129.53 0.0034 No. of parkland amenities 38,097 per amenity 507,758
Parks and Recreation Vehicles and Equipment $39.85 0.0009 No. of vehicles and equipment 44,278 per vehicle 156,212
Indoor Recreation Facilities $1,454.68 7.5870 ft² of building area 192 per ft² 5,702,346
Library Facilities $241.60 0.6341 ft² of building area 381 per ft² 947,072
Library Collection Materials $68.28 2.1257 No. of library collection items 32 per collection item 267,658
APPENDIX B - LEVEL OF SERVICE CEILING
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
SUMMARY OF SERVICE STANDARDS AS PER DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ACT, 1997
Maximum
Ceiling LOS
Library Services
Services Related to a
Highway and Related
Infrastructure
10 Year Average Service Standard
Quality (per capita)Quantity (per capita)Service Category Sub-Component
Fire Protection Services
Indoor and Outdoor
Recreation Services
Page B-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Town of Grimsby
Service Standard Calculation Sheet
Service: Services Related to a Highway
Unit Measure: km of roadways
Description 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20152016 Value
($/km)
Collectors - Rural kilometers
2 lane 49 49 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 $1,229,000
Collectors - Urban kilometers
2 lane 41 43 43 43 43 43 47 47 47 47 $2,457,000
Total 90 92 93 93 93 93 97 97 97 97
Population 23,937 24,032 24,472 24,744 24,938 25,325 25,791 25,917 26,467 27,075
Per Capita Standard 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0038 0.0037 0.0037 0.0038 0.0037 0.0037 0.0036
10 Year Average 2006-2015
Quantity Standard 0.0037
Quality Standard $1,821,973
Service Standard $6,741
DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year
Forecast Population 3,920
$ per Capita $6,741
Eligible Amount $26,425,896
Page B-4
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Town of Grimsby
Service Standard Calculation Sheet
Service: Services Related to a Highway - Related Facilities
Unit Measure: ft² of building area
Description 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
2016 Bld'g
Value
($/ft²)
Value/ft²
with land,
site works,
etc.
Operations Centre 16,459 16,459 16,459 16,459 17,059 17,059 17,059 17,059 17,059 17,059 $132 $153
Winston Road Barn 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 $226 $256
Sand/Salt Dome 6,648 6,648 6,648 6,648 6,648 6,648 6,648 6,648 6,648 6,648 $113 $132
Total 24,407 24,407 24,407 24,407 25,007 25,007 25,007 25,007 25,007 25,007
Population 23,937 24,032 24,472 24,744 24,938 25,325 25,791 25,917 26,467 27,075
Per Capita Standard 1.0196 1.0156 0.9973 0.9864 1.0028 0.9874 0.9696 0.9649 0.9448 0.9236
10 Year Average 2006-2015
Quantity Standard 0.9812
Quality Standard $153
Service Standard $150
DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year
Forecast Population 3,920
$ per Capita $150
Eligible Amount $587,608
Page B-5
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Town of Grimsby
Service Standard Calculation Sheet
Service: Services Related to a Highway - Related Vehicles
Unit Measure: No. of vehicles and equipment
Description 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20152016 Value
($/Vehicle)
Dump Truck, Plow, Wing 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 $242,000
Pickup Truck 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 $25,000
Pickup Truck 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $35,000
Pickup Truck 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $55,000
Dump Truck (1/2 tonne) 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 $55,000
Van (International) - - - - - - - 1 1 1 $124,000
Van (Ford) 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $55,000
Sewer Flusher 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $220,000
Street Flusher 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $265,000
Trackless & Snow Blower 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 $160,000
Backhoe (John Deere) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $195,000
Backhoe (Case) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $155,000
Loader 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $195,000
Progator - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $22,000
Portable Steamer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $30,000
Concrete Saw 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $7,000
Mowers 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 $15,000
Tractor - - - - - - 1 1 1 1 $100,000
Air Compressor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $25,000
Line Painter 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $12,000
Vibrator Roller 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $50,000
Trash Pump 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $25,000
W/C Brush Chipper 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $45,000
Precision Locating Kit - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $7,000
SeeSnake Sanitary Sewer Video Camera 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $15,000
Vacuum Excavator / Hydrovac - - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $35,000
Valve Exerciser - - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $55,000
Enclosed Trailer - - - - - 1 1 1 1 1 $10,000
Boring Machine 2 2 - - - - - - - - $25,800
Cub Cadet Utility Vehicle 1 1 1 - - - - - - - $16,800
Total 38 39 38 39 40 43 44 46 46 46
Population 23,937 24,032 24,472 24,744 24,938 25,325 25,791 25,917 26,467 27,075
Per Capita Standard 0.0016 0.0016 0.0016 0.0016 0.0016 0.0017 0.0017 0.0018 0.0017 0.0017
10 Year Average 2006-2015
Quantity Standard 0.0017
Quality Standard $93,447
Service Standard $159
DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year
Forecast Population 3,920
$ per Capita $159
Eligible Amount $622,731
Page B-6
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Town of Grimsby
Service Standard Calculation Sheet
Service: Fire Facilities
Unit Measure: ft² of building area
Description 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
2016 Bld'g
Value
($/ft²)
Value/ft²
with land,
site works,
etc.
Station #1 (Headquarters) 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 $288 $325
Station #2 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 $113 $132
Total 11,600 11,600 11,600 11,600 11,600 11,600 11,600 11,600 11,600 11,600
Population 23,937 24,032 24,472 24,744 24,938 25,325 25,791 25,917 26,467 27,075
Per Capita Standard 0.4846 0.4827 0.4740 0.4688 0.4652 0.4580 0.4498 0.4476 0.4383 0.4284
10 Year Average 2006-2015
Quantity Standard 0.4597
Quality Standard $298
Service Standard $137
DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year
Forecast Population 3,920
$ per Capita $137
Eligible Amount $537,746
Page B-7
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Town of Grimsby
Service Standard Calculation Sheet
Service: Fire Vehicles
Unit Measure: No. of vehicles
Description 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20152016 Value
($/Vehicle)
1981 Triple Comb. Pumper 1 1 1 - - $670,000
1987 Tanker 1 1 1 1 - - $258,000
1993 Plymouth Caravan Command - - $28,200
1994 Freightliner Trip. Comb. Pump 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $670,000
1995 Taurus Command Car - - $25,800
1999 Astro Van Command Vehicle 1 1 - - $41,200
2001 Spartan Glad Quint 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $1,236,000
2002 GMC Jimmy Command Car 1 1 1 1 1 - - $46,400
2003 Spartan Ad. Heavy Rescue 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $567,000
2008 KME Triple Comp. Pumper 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $773,000
2009 F-250 Command Vehicle 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $67,000
2005 Ford Explorer Command Vehicle 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $67,000
2010 GMC Acadia (repurpose Prevention 2017) 1 1 1 1 1 1 $64,680
2011 Freightliner Tanker 1 1 1 1 1 $360,000
2013 Ford Explorer (repurpose Prevention 2018) 1 1 1 1 $67,680
2014 Dodge Ram 3500 1 1 1 $78,000
Total 8 8 9 8 8 8 9 10 10 10
Population 23,937 24,032 24,472 24,744 24,938 25,325 25,791 25,917 26,467 27,075
Per Capita Standard 0.0003 0.0003 0.0004 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004
10 Year Average 2006-2015
Quantity Standard 0.0003
Quality Standard $503,767
Service Standard $151
DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year
Forecast Population 3,920
$ per Capita $151
Eligible Amount $592,430
Page B-8
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Town of Grimsby
Service Standard Calculation Sheet
Service: Fire Small Equipment and Gear
Unit Measure: No. of equipment and gear
Description 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20152016 Value
($/item)
Firefighters 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 48 $11,000
Total 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 48
Population 23,937 24,032 24,472 24,744 24,938 25,325 25,791 25,917 26,467 27,075
Per Capita Standard 0.0018 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0017 0.0016 0.0016 0.0016 0.0018
10 Year Average 2006-2015
Quantity Standard 0.0017
Quality Standard $10,912
Service Standard $19
DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year
Forecast Population 3,920
$ per Capita $19
Eligible Amount $72,716
Page B-9
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Town of Grimsby
Service Standard Calculation Sheet
Service: Parking Spaces
Unit Measure: No. of spaces
Description 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20152016 Value
($/space)
North Side Parking Lot 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 $3,100
Christie St. Parking Lot 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 $3,100
Ontario St. Parking Lot 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 $3,100
Elizabeth St. Parking Lot 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 $3,100
Total 158 158 158 158 158 158 158 158 158 158
Population 23,937 24,032 24,472 24,744 24,938 25,325 25,791 25,917 26,467 27,075
Per Capita Standard 0.0066 0.0066 0.0065 0.0064 0.0063 0.0062 0.0061 0.0061 0.0060 0.0058
10 Year Average 2006-2015
Quantity Standard 0.0063
Quality Standard $3,081
Service Standard $19
DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year
Forecast Population 3,920
$ per Capita $19
Eligible Amount $76,087
Page B-10
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Town of Grimsby
Service Standard Calculation Sheet
Service: Parkland Development
Unit Measure: No. of developed parkland acres
Description 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20152016 Value
($/Acre)
Neighbourhood/Community Parks 23.3 23.3 23.3 23.3 23.3 23.3 23.3 23.3 23.3 23.3 $63,000
Neighbourhood Parks 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 $63,000
Community Parks 37.1 37.1 37.1 37.1 37.1 37.1 37.1 37.1 37.1 37.1 $63,000
Sub-Neighbourhood Parks 14.1 14.1 15.0 15.0 15.0 16.0 16.0 17.0 17.0 18.4 $63,000
Total 98 98 99 99 99 100 100 101 101 102
Population 23,937 24,032 24,472 24,744 24,938 25,325 25,791 25,917 26,467 27,075
Per Capita Standard 0.0041 0.0041 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0039 0.0039 0.0039 0.0038 0.0038
10 Year Average 2006-2015
Quantity Standard 0.0040
Quality Standard $62,240
Service Standard $249
DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year
Forecast Population 3,920
$ per Capita $249
Eligible Amount $975,923
Page B-11
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Town of Grimsby
Service Standard Calculation Sheet
Service: Parkland Amenities
Unit Measure: No. of parkland amenities
Description 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20152016 Value
($/item)
NEIGHBOURHOOD/COMMUNITY PARKS:
Ball Diamonds - Lit 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $234,600
Ball Diamonds 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 $44,100
Play Structures/Equipment 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $3,200
Swing Sets 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $3,200
Sand Volleyball 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $7,900
Splash Pad 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $309,000
Tot Splash 1 1 1 $51,500
NEIGHBOURHOOD PARKS:
Ball Diamonds 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $44,100
Play Structures/Equipment 8 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 $3,200
Swing Sets 6 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 $3,200
Tennis Court - Lit 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $102,300
Hard Court 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 $55,100
Soccer Field 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $30,900
COMMUNITY PARKS:
Ball Diamonds - Lit 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $234,600
Ball Diamonds 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 $48,800
Play Structures/Equipment 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $54,700
Swing Sets 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $3,200
Picnic Shelter 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $31,500
Soccer Field 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 $30,900
Equipment Storage Shed 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $37,700
Tennis Court 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 $62,100
SUB-NEIGHBOURHOOD PARKS:
Ball Diamonds 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $44,100
Play Structures/Equipment 9 9 10 10 10 11 11 12 12 14 $56,400
Swing Sets 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 12 $3,200
Hard Court 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $23,600
SCHOOLS:
Soccer 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 $51,500
Baseball 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $44,100
Total 77 80 86 86 86 87 87 90 90 94
Population 23,937 24,032 24,472 24,744 24,938 25,325 25,791 25,917 26,467 27,075
Per Capita Standard 0.0032 0.0033 0.0035 0.0035 0.0034 0.0034 0.0034 0.0035 0.0034 0.0035
10 Year Average 2006-2015
Quantity Standard 0.0034
Quality Standard $38,097
Service Standard $130
DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year
Forecast Population 3,920
$ per Capita $130
Eligible Amount $507,758
Page B-12
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Town of Grimsby
Service Standard Calculation Sheet
Service: Parks and Recreation Vehicles and Equipment
Unit Measure: No. of vehicles and equipment
Description 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20152016 Value
($/Vehicle)
Canadian Explorer Trailer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $7,900
John Deere 2155 Tractor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $55,100
John Deere 2150 Tractor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $55,100
Hitchman Trailer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $7,900
Melroe Bobcat (bucket/fork) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $31,500
14' Trailer Tandem (for #244) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $7,900
Bannerman Turf Topper 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $7,900
Ford F150 Pickup Truck 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $52,000
Ford 350 Crew Cap & Plow 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $75,600
John Deere 4300 Tractor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $55,100
Ford F150 Pickup Truck 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $31,500
Olympia Ice Resurfacer - - $78,700
Olympia Ice Resurfacer 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $78,700
GMC Sierra 1500 Pickup Truck 1 1 1 1 - - $28,700
Cushman 951D Riding Mower 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - $86,100
4WD John Deere Utility Tractor/Loader 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $55,100
Jacobson 9016 wide area mower 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $56,700
John Deere 1600 wide area mower 1 1 1 $49,400
Sterling Dump Truck & Plow 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $97,900
John Deere Track Mower 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $25,800
Hitchman Z Trailer 1 1 1 1 1 1 $10,300
New Holland Tractor W/loader/Plow 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $77,300
Sky Jack Scissor Lift 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $30,900
Total 20 20 21 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Population 23,937 24,032 24,472 24,744 24,938 25,325 25,791 25,917 26,467 27,075
Per Capita Standard 0.0008 0.0008 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008
10 Year Average 2006-2015
Quantity Standard 0.0009
Quality Standard $44,278
Service Standard $40
DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year
Forecast Population 3,920
$ per Capita $40
Eligible Amount $156,212
Page B-13
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Town of Grimsby
Service Standard Calculation Sheet
Service: Indoor Recreation Facilities
Unit Measure: ft² of building area
Description 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
2016 Bld'g
Value
($/ft²)
Value/ft²
with land,
site works,
etc.
Grimsby Peach King Centre (Includes
Arena//Rec. Ser. Office)93,000 93,000 93,000 93,000 93,000 93,000 93,000 93,000 93,000 93,000 $170 $194
Senior's Centre 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 $204 $232
Calder Community Centre 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 $158 $182
Grand Ave. Community Hall 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 $294 $331
Lions Pool and Change House 4,838 4,838 4,838 4,838 4,838 4,838 6,356 6,356 6,356 6,356 $543 $605
Tennis Club House 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 $124 $144
Soccer Club House 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 $158 $182
Baseball Club House 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 $124 $144
Park Shop 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 $124 $144
Maintenance Shop 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 $158 $182
Pumphouse Building 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 1,744 $158 $182
Pumphouse Building - Garage 1,292 1,292 1,292 1,292 1,292 1,292 1,292 1,292 1,292 1,292 $23 $32
Lawn Bowling Facility 11,840 11,840 11,840 11,840 11,840 11,840 11,840 11,840 11,840 11,840 $11 $20
Skate Park Facility 43,056 43,056 43,056 43,056 43,056 43,056 43,056 43,056 43,056 43,056 $158 $182
Alway Community Centre 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 $158 $182
Outdoor Rink - - - - - 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 $57 $70
Total 187,370 187,370 187,370 187,370 187,370 194,570 196,088 196,088 196,088 196,088
Population 23,937 24,032 24,472 24,744 24,938 25,325 25,791 25,917 26,467 27,075
Per Capita Standard 7.8276 7.7967 7.6565 7.5723 7.5134 7.6829 7.6030 7.5660 7.4088 7.2424
10 Year Average 2006-2015
Quantity Standard 7.5870
Quality Standard $192
Service Standard $1,455
DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year
Forecast Population 3,920
$ per Capita $1,455
Eligible Amount $5,702,346
Page B-14
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Town of Grimsby
Service Standard Calculation Sheet
Service: Library Facilities
Unit Measure: ft² of building area
Description 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
2016 Bld'g
Value
($/ft²)
Value/ft²
with land,
site works,
etc.
Grimsby Public Library 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 $339 $381
Total 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000
Population 23,937 24,032 24,472 24,744 24,938 25,325 25,791 25,917 26,467 27,075
Per Capita Standard 0.6684 0.6658 0.6538 0.6466 0.6416 0.6318 0.6204 0.6174 0.6045 0.5910
10 Year Average 2006-2015
Quantity Standard 0.6341
Quality Standard $381
Service Standard $242
DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year
Forecast Population 3,920
$ per Capita $242
Eligible Amount $947,072
Page B-15
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Town of Grimsby
Service Standard Calculation Sheet
Service: Library Collection Materials
Unit Measure: No. of library collection items
Description 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20152016 Value
($/item)
Books 49,100 50,200 50,700 50,959 48,438 52,023 50,700 49,800 47,748 46,058 $31
Periodicals 100 100 100 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,493 1,765 2,003 $7
CD Audio 1,200 1,000 1,034 1,034 1,034 1,034 1,034 1,072 1,404 1,353 $91
DVD 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 2,505 2,807 3,414 $34
Online Database/Digital Resources 12 12 12 17 19 19 19 21 18 21 $861
Total 51,412 52,312 52,846 54,610 52,391 56,276 55,253 54,891 53,742 52,849
Population 23,937 24,032 24,472 24,744 24,938 25,325 25,791 25,917 26,467 27,075
Per Capita Standard 2.15 2.18 2.16 2.21 2.10 2.22 2.14 2.12 2.03 1.95
10 Year Average 2006-2015
Quantity Standard 2.1257
Quality Standard $32
Service Standard $68
DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year
Forecast Population 3,920
$ per Capita $68
Eligible Amount $267,658
Page C-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Appendix C – Long Term Capital and
Operating Cost Examination
Page C-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Appendix C – Long Term Capital and Operating Cost Examination
Town of Grimsby Annual Capital and Operating Cost Impact
As a requirement of the D.C.A. s.10(2)(c), an examination for each service to which the
development charge by-law would relate, of the long term capital and operating costs
for capital infrastructure required for the service.” The D.C.A. s.10(2)(c.2) also requires
an asset management plan be prepared. This can be found in Appendix F.
As part of this analysis, it was deemed necessary to isolate the incremental operating
expenditures directly associated with these capital projects, factor in cost saving
attributable to economies of scale or cost sharing where applicable, and prorate the cost
on a per unit basis (i.e. sq.ft. of building space, per vehicle, etc.). This was undertaken
through a review of the Town’s approved 2014 F.I.R.
In addition to the operational impacts, over time the initial capital projects will require
replacement. This replacement of capital is often referred to as lifecycle cost. By
definition, lifecycle costs are all the costs which are incurred during the life of a physical
asset, from the time its acquisition is first considered, to the time it is taken out of
service for disposal or redeployment. The method selected for life cycle costing is the
sinking fund method which provides that money will be contributed annually and
invested, so that those funds will grow over time to equal the amount required for future
replacement. The following factors were utilized to calculate the annual replacement
cost of the capital projects (annual contribution = factor X capital asset cost) and are
based on an annual growth rate of 2% (net of inflation) over the average useful life of
the asset:
FACTOR TERM
Stormwater Channels, drainage and ponds 0.00516 80
Wastewater Sewers 0.00516 80
Water Distribution Systems 0.00516 80
Roads 0.04116 20
Facilities 0.01656 40
PW Rolling Stock 0.09133 10
Fire vehicles 0.05783 15
Small equipment and gear 0.09133 10
Municipal parking spaces 0.03122 25
Indoor and Outdoor Recreation Vehicles and Equipment 0.02465 30
Library materials 0.09133 10
Page C-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Table C-1 depicts the annual operating impact resulting from the proposed gross capital
projects at the time they are all in place. It is important to note that, while Town
program expenditures will increase with growth in population, the costs associated with
the new infrastructure (i.e. facilities) would be delayed until the time these works are in
place.
Table C-1
TOWN OF GRIMSBY
OPERATING AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURE IMPACTS
FOR FUTURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
SERVICE
Gross Total Cost
(Net of BTE)
(2016 $)
ANNUAL LIFECYCLE
EXPENDITURES
ANNUAL
OPERATING
EXPENDITURES
TOTAL ANNUAL
EXPENDITURES
1. Stormwater Drainage and Control Services
1.1 Channels, drainage and ponds 900,000 14,900 150,491 165,391
2. Wastewater Services
2.1 Sewers 709,000 11,700 864,389 876,089
3. Water Services
3.1 Distribution systems 1,282,700 21,200 768,571 789,771
4. Services Related to a Highway and Related Infrastructure
4.1 Roads 16,487,500 273,000 309,098 582,098
4.2 Depots and Domes 886,000 14,700 16,610 31,310
4.3 PW Rolling Stock 681,800 11,300 12,782 24,082
5. Fire Protection Services
5.1 Fire facilities 5,320,200 88,100 95,872 183,972
5.2 Fire vehicles 8,424,200 51,400 151,808 203,208
5.3 Small equipment and gear 198,000 3,300 3,568 6,868
6. Parking Services
6.1 Municipal parking spaces 222,300 3,700 0 3,700
7. Indoor and Outdoor Recreation Services
7.1Parkland development, amenities & trails,
vehicles & indoor facilities8,051,100
133,300 152,403 285,703
8. Library Services
8.1 Library facilities 945,000 15,700 118,988 134,688
8.2 Library materials 260,000 4,300 32,737 37,037
9. Administration
9.1 Studies 374,865 0 0 0
Total 0 44,742,665 646,600 2,677,318 3,323,918
Page D-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Appendix D – Development Charge Reserve
Fund Policy
Page D-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Appendix D – Development Charge Reserve
Fund Policy
D.1 Legislative Requirements
The D.C.A. requires development charge collections (and associated interest) to be
placed in separate reserve funds. Sections 33 through 36 of the Act provide the
following regarding reserve fund establishment and use:
a municipality shall establish a reserve fund for each service to which the D.C.
by-law relates; s.7(1), however, allows services to be grouped into categories of
services for reserve fund (and credit) purposes, although only 100% eligible and
90% eligible services may be combined (minimum of two reserve funds);
the municipality shall pay each development charge it collects into a reserve fund
or funds to which the charge relates;
the money in a reserve fund shall be spent only for the "capital costs" determined
through the legislated calculation process (as per s.5(1) 2-8);
money may be borrowed from the fund but must be paid back with interest
(O.Reg. 82/98, s.11(1) defines this as Bank of Canada rate either on the day the
by-law comes into force or, if specified in the by-law, the first business day of
each quarter);
D.C. reserve funds may not be consolidated with other municipal reserve funds
for investment purposes and may only be as an interim financing source for
capital undertakings for which development charges may be spent (s.37).
Annually, the Treasurer of the municipality is required to provide Council with a financial
statement related to the D.C. by-law(s) and reserve funds. This statement must be
made available to the public and may be requested to be forwarded to the Minister of
Municipal Affairs and Housing. The D.C.A. does not prescribe how the statement is to
be made available to the public. We would recommend that a resolution of Council
make the statement available on the municipality's website or upon request.
Subsection 43(2) and O.Reg. 82/98 prescribes the information that must be included in
the Treasurer's statement, as follows:
opening balance;
closing balance;
Page D-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
description of each service and/or service category for which the reserve fund
was established (including a list of services within a service category);
transactions for the year (e.g. collections, draws) including each assets capital
costs to be funded from the D.C. reserve fund and the manner for funding the
capital costs not funded under the D.C. by-law (i.e. non-D.C. recoverable cost
share and post-period D.C. recoverable cost share);
for projects financed by development charges, the amount spent on the project
from the D.C. reserve fund and the amount and source of any other monies
spent on the project.
amounts borrowed, purpose of the borrowing and interest accrued during
previous year;
amount and source of money used by the municipality to repay municipal
obligations to the D.C. reserve fund;
list of credits by service or service category (outstanding at beginning of the year,
given in the year and outstanding at the end of the year by holder); and
for credits granted under s.14 of the old D.C.A., a schedule identifying the value
of credits recognized by the municipality, the service to which it applies and the
source of funding used to finance the credit; and
a statement as to compliance with s.s. 59(1) of the D.C.A., whereby the
municipality shall not impose, directly or indirectly, a charge related to a
development or a requirement to construct a service related to development,
except as permitted by the D.C. or another Act.
Based upon the above, Figure D-1, and Attachments 1 and 2, set out the format for
which annual reporting to Council should be provided.
D.2 D.C. Reserve Fund Application
Section 35 of the D.C.A. states that:
“The money in a reserve fund established for a service may be spent only for capital costs determined under paragraphs 2 to 8 of subsection 5(1).”
This provision clearly establishes that reserve funds collected for a specific service are
only to be used for that service, or to be used as a source of interim financing of capital
undertakings for which a development charge may be spent.
Page D-4
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Figure D-1
Town of Grimsby
Annual Treasurer's Statement of Development Charge Reserve Funds
Services to which the Development Charge Relates (examples)
Non-Discounted Services Discounted Services
Description
Services Related
to a Highway and
Related
Infrastructure
Water
Services
Wastewater
Services
Stormwater
Drainage and
Control Services
Fire
Protection
Services
Indoor and
Outdoor
Recreation
Services
Parking
Services
Library
Services Administration
Opening Balance, January 1, ________
Plus:
Development Charge Collections
Accrued Interest
Repayment of Monies Borrowed from Fund and Associated Interest1
Sub-Total
Less:
Amount Transferred to Capital (or Other) Funds2
Amounts Refunded
Amounts Loaned to Other DC Service Category for Interim Financing
Credits3
Sub-Total
Closing Balance, December 31, ________1 Source of funds used to repay the DC reserve fund
2 See Attachment 1 for details
3 See Attachment 2 for details
The Municipality is compliant with s.s. 59.1 (1) of the Development Charges Act , whereby charges are not directly or indirectly imposed on development nor has a requirement to construct a service related to
development been imposed, except as permitted by the Development Charges Act or another Act.
Total
Page D-5
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Attachment 1
Town of Grimsby
Amount Transferred to Capital (or Other) Funds - Capital Fund Transactions
DC Recoverable Cost Share Non-DC Recoverable Cost Share
DC Forecast Period Post DC Forecast Period
Capital Fund Transactions
Gross Capital
Cost
DC Reserve
Fund Draw
DC Debt
Financing
Grants,
Subsidies
Other
Contributions
Post-Period
Benefit/
Capacity Interim
Financing
Grants,
Subsidies
Other
Contributions
Other
Reserve/Reser
ve Fund Draws
Tax Supported
Operating Fund
Contributions
Rate Supported
Operating Fund
Contributions Debt Financing
Grants,
Subsidies
Other
Contributions
Services Related to a Highway and Related Infrastructure
Capital Cost A
Capital Cost B
Capital Cost C
Sub-Total - Services Related to Highways $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Water Services
Capital Cost D
Capita Cost E
Capital Cost F
Sub-Total - Water $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Wastewater Services
Capital Cost G
Capita Cost H
Capital Cost I
Sub-Total - Wastewater $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Amount Transferred to Operating (or Other) Funds - Operating Fund Transactions
DC Reserve Fund Draw Post DC Forecast Period Non-DC Recoverable Cost Share
Operating Fund Transactions Principal Interest Principal Interest Source Principal Interest Source
Services Related to a Highway and Related Infrastructure
Capital Cost J
Capita Cost K
Capital Cost L
Sub-Total - Services Related to Highways $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Water Services
Capital Cost M
Capita Cost N
Capital Cost O
Sub-Total - Water $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Wastewater Services
Capital Cost P
Capita Cost Q
Capital Cost R
Sub-Total - Wastewater $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Annual Debt
Repayment
Amount
Page D-6
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Attachment 2
Town of Grimsby
Statement of Credit Holder Transactions
Credit Holder
Applicable DC
Reserve Fund
Credit Balance
Outstanding
Beginning of
Year ________
Additional
Credits
Granted During
Year
Credits Used by
Holder During
Year
Credit Balance
Outstanding
End of Year
________
Credit Holder A
Credit Holder B
Credit Holder C
Credit Holder D
Credit Holder E
Credit Holder F
Page E-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Appendix E – Local Service Policy
Page E-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Appendix E – Local Service Policy
Town of Grimsby
General Policy Guidelines on Development Charge and Local Service
Funding for Road-related and Stormwater Management
A. Services Related to a Highway
A highway and services related to a highway are intended for the transportation of
people and goods via many different modes including, but not limited to, passenger
automobiles, commercial vehicles, transit vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians. The
highway shall consist of all land and associated infrastructure built to support (or
service) this movement of people and goods regardless of the mode of transportation
employed, thereby achieving a serviced street.
A serviced street is the concept whereby a highway is planned, designed, operated and
maintained to enable pedestrians, cyclists, public transit users and motorists to safely
and comfortably be moved, thereby allowing for the efficient movement of persons and
goods.
The associated infrastructure to achieve this concept shall include, but is not limited to:
road pavement structure and curbs; grade separation/bridge structures (for any
vehicles, railways and/or pedestrians); grading, drainage and retaining wall features;
culvert structures; storm water drainage systems; traffic control systems; active
transportation facilities (e.g. sidewalks, bike lanes, multi-use trails, etc.); transit lanes;
stops and amenities; roadway illumination systems; boulevard and median surfaces
(e.g. sod & topsoil, paving, etc.); street trees and landscaping; parking lanes & laybys
and driveway entrances; noise attenuation systems; railings, safety barriers and utilities
which includes burial of existing overhead and underground systems.
1) Local, Collector, and Arterial Town Roads or Other Provincial/Regional Roads
(including land)
a. Internal to development, inclusive of all land and associated infrastructure:
direct developer responsibility under s. 59 of the Development Charges
Act, 1997 (D.C.A.), as amended, as the local service component.
Page E-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
b. External to but abutting to the development shall become a serviced street
to the Town’s requirements. The cost of the full serviced street and
infrastructure shall be 50% of the adjacent Developer’s direct
responsibility with the remaining 50% funded in the D.C.
c. External to but not abutting the Development that are required to become
a serviced street shall be funded in the D.C.
2) Traffic Control Systems, Signals and Intersection Improvements
a. On new roads and road improvements unrelated to a specific
development: included as part of road costing funded through D.C.s.
b. On new roads external to but abutting the development: 50% of the
adjacent developer’s direct responsibility with the remaining 50% included
as part of road costing funded through D.C.s.
c. For any private site entrances or entrances to specific development:
direct developer responsibility under s.59 of D.C.A. (as a local service).
d. On road intersections with Regional roads: include in Region D.C.s or in
certain circumstances, may be a direct developer responsibility.
e. Intersection improvements, new or modified signalization, signal timing
and optimization plans, area traffic studies for highways attributed to
growth and unrelated to a specific development: included in D.C.
calculation as permitted under s.5(1) of the D.C.A.
3) Streetlights
a. Streetlights on new roads and road improvements: considered part of the
complete street and included as part of the road costing funded through
D.C.s or in exceptional circumstances, may be direct developer
responsibility through local service provisions (s.59 of D.C.A.).
b. Streetlights on roads internal to development: considered part of the
complete street and included as a direct developer responsibility under
s.59 of the D.C.A. (as a local service).
Page E-4
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
c. Streetlights on new roads external to but abutting the development: 50%
of the adjacent developer’s direct responsibility with the remaining 50%
included as part of road costing funded through D.C.s.
d. Streetlights on roads external to development, needed to support a
specific development or required to link with the area to which the plan
relates: considered part of the complete street and included as a direct
developer responsibility under s.59 of the D.C.A. (as a local service).
4) Transportation Related Pedestrian and Cycling Facilities
a. Sidewalks, multi-use trails, cycle tracks, and bike lanes, inclusive of all
required infrastructure, located within roads, Regional roads and provincial
highway corridors: considered part of the complete street and included in
D.C.s, or, in exceptional circumstances, may be direct developer
responsibility through local service provisions (s.59 of the D.C.A.).
b. Sidewalks, multi-use trails, cycle tracks, and bike lanes, inclusive of all
required infrastructure, located within or linking to road corridors internal to
development: considered part of the complete street and is a direct
developer responsibility under s.59 of the D.C.A. (as a local service).
c. Other sidewalks, multi-use trails, cycle tracks, and bike lanes, inclusive of
all required infrastructure, located within road corridors external to
development and needed to support a specific development or required to
link with the area to which the plan relates: direct developer responsibility
under s.59 of the D.C.A. (as a local service).
d. Multi-use trails (not associated with a road), inclusive of all land and
required infrastructure, that go beyond the function of a (parkland)
recreational trail and form part of the Town’s active transportation network
for cycling and/or walking: included in D.C.s.
5) Noise Abatement Measures
a. External and internal to development where it is related to, or a
requirement of a specific development: direct developer responsibility
under s.59 of the D.C.A. (as a local service).
Page E-5
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
b. On road improvements abutting an existing community and unrelated to a
specific development: included as part of road costing funded through
D.C.s.
6) Transit Nodes, Terminals, and Bus Stop Infrastructure
a. Transit node and bus stop infrastructure and amenities located within town
and regional corridors, and including transit stations or terminals located
on lands to serve these road corridors: considered part of the serviced
street and included in area municipal D.C.
b. Transit node and bus stop infrastructure and amenities located within road
corridors internal to development: considered part of the complete street
and direct developer responsibility under s.59 of the D.C.A. (as a local
service).
c. Transit node and bus stop infrastructure and amenities located within road
corridors external to the development and needed to support a specific
development or required to link with the area to which the plan relates:
direct developer responsibility under s.59 of the D.C.A. (as a local
service).
B. Parkland Development Service Policy
1) Parkland
a. Parkland development for community, neighbourhood and sub-
neighbourhood parks: direct developer responsibility to provide at
base condition, as defined/approved by the Town’s Engineering and
Parks Departments, as a local service provision, i.e. grading,
sodding/seeding (over .81 ha), fencing, etc.
b. Program facilities, amenities and furniture within parkland: included
in D.C.s.
2) Recreational Trails
a. Recreational trails (multi-use trails) that do not form part of the Town’s
active transportation network, and their associated infrastructure
Page E-6
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
(landscaping, bridges, trail surfaces, etc.): direct developer responsibility
as a local service.
3) Landscape Buffer Blocks, Features, Cul-de-sac Islands, Berms, Grade Transition
Areas, Walkways Connections to Adjacent Arterial Roads, Open Space,
Parkland, etc.
a. The cost of developing all landscape buffer blocks, landscape features,
cul-de-sac islands, berms, grade transition areas, walkways connections
to adjacent arterial roads, open space and other remnant pieces of land
conveyed to the Town shall be a direct developer responsibility as a local
service. Such costs include but are not limited to:
i. Pre-grading, sodding or seeding, supply and installation of
amended soil (to the Town’s required depth), landscaping features,
perimeter fencing and all planting; and
ii. Perimeter fencing to the Town standard located on the public
property side of the property line adjacent land uses (such as but
not limited to arterial roads) as directed by the Town.
4) Natural Heritage System (N.H.S.)
a. N.H.S. includes engineered and situ stream corridors, natural buffers for
woodlots, wetlands remnants, etc., as well as sub-watersheds within the
boundaries of the Town. Direct developer responsibility as a local service
provision including but not limited to the following:
i. Riparian planting and landscaping requirements (as required by the
Town, Conservation Authority or other authorities having
jurisdiction) as a result of the creation of, or construction of within
the N.H.S. and associated buffers.
5) Infrastructure Assets Constructed by Developers
a. Any parks and open space infrastructure assets to be built by the
developer on behalf of the Town require design/construction approval of
the Town of Grimsby’s Public Works and Recreation, Facilities and
Culture Departments.
Page F-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Appendix F – Asset Management Plan
Page F-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Appendix F – Asset Management Plan
The recent changes to the D.C.A. (new section 10(2)(c.2)) require that the Background
Study must include an asset management plan related to new infrastructure. Section
10 (3) of the D.C.A. provides:
The asset management plan shall,
(a) deal with all assets whose capital costs are proposed to be funded under
the development charge by-law;
(b) demonstrate that all the assets mentioned in clause (a) are financially
sustainable over their full life cycle;
(c) contain any other information that is prescribed; and
(d) be prepared in the prescribed manner.
In regard to the above, section 8 of the Regulations was amended to include
subsections (2), (3) and (4) which set out for specific detailed requirements for transit
(only). For all services except transit, there are no prescribed requirements at this time
thus requiring the municipality to define the approach to include within the Background
Study.
At a broad level, the Asset Management Plan provides for the long term investment in
an asset over its entire useful life along with the funding. The schematic below
identifies the costs for an asset through its entire lifecycle. For growth related works,
the majority of capital costs will be funded by the D.C. Non-growth related expenditures
will then be funded from non-D.C. revenues as noted below. During the useful life of
the asset, there will be minor maintenance costs to extend the life of the asset along
with additional program related expenditures to provide the full services to the residents.
At the end of the life of the asset, it will be replaced by non-D.C. financing sources.
Page F-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
In 2012, the Province developed Building Together: Guide for municipal asset
management plans which outlines the key elements for an asset management plan
(A.M.P.), as follows:
State of local infrastructure: asset types, quantities, age, condition, financial
accounting valuation and replacement cost valuation.
Desired levels of service: defines levels of service through performance measures
and discusses any external trends or issues that may affect expected levels of service
or the municipality’s ability to meet them (for example, new accessibility standards,
climate change impacts).
Asset management strategy: the asset management strategy is the set of planned
actions that will seek to generate the desired levels of service in a sustainable way,
while managing risk, at the lowest lifecycle cost.
Financing strategy: having a financial plan is critical for putting an A.M.P. into action.
By having a strong financial plan, municipalities can also demonstrate that they have
made a concerted effort to integrate the A.M.P. with financial planning and municipal
budgeting, and are making full use of all available infrastructure financing tools.
Commensurate with the above, the Town prepared an Asset Management Plan in 2014
for its existing assets, however, the plan does not include all assets categories that are
Page F-4
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
included in the capital forecast needs of the D.C. background study and for the services
included, the plan only addresses non-growth costs of capital (i.e. does not include
expansionary capital). As a result, the asset management requirement for the D.C.
must be undertaken in the absence of this information.
In recognition to the schematic above, the following table (presented in 2016 $) has
been developed to provide the annualized expenditures and revenues associated with
new growth. Note that the D.C.A. does not require an analysis of the non-D.C. capital
needs or their associated operating costs so these are omitted from the table below. As
well, as all existing assets for the categories of assets included in the D.C. eligible
capital costs are not included in the Town’s Asset Management Plan (i.e. facilities,
vehicles and parks and recreation assets not included), the present infrastructure gap
and associated funding plan have not been considered at this time. Hence the following
does not represent a fiscal impact assessment (including future tax/rate increases) but
provides insight into the potential affordability of the new assets:
1. The non-D.C. recoverable portion of the projects which will require financing from
Town financial resources (i.e. taxation, rates, fees, etc.). This amount has been
presented on an annual debt charge amount based on 10-year financing.
2. Lifecycle costs for the 2016 D.C. capital works have been presented based on a
sinking fund basis. The assets have been considered over their estimated useful
lives.
3. Incremental operating costs for the D.C. services (only) have been included.
4. The resultant total annualized expenditures are $4.56 million.
5. Consideration was given to the potential new taxation and user fee revenues
which will be generated as a result of new growth. These revenues will be
available to finance the expenditures above. The new operating revenues are
$2.4 million. This amount, totalled with the existing operating revenues of $28.5
million, provide annual revenues of $30.9 million by the end of the period.
6. In consideration of the above, the capital plan is deemed to be financially
sustainable.
Page F-5
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Sub-Total 2031 (Total)
Expenditures (Annualized)
Annual Debt Payment on Non-Growth
Related Capital1 $25,416
Lifecycle:
Annual Lifecycle - DC Services $646,464
Sub-Total - Annual Lifecycle $646,464 $646,464
Incremental Operating Costs (for D.C.
Services) $2,758,080
Total Expenditures $3,429,961
Revenue2 (Annualized)
Total Existing Revenue $28,467,020
Incremental Tax and Non-Tax Revenue
(User Fees, Fines, Licences, etc.) $2,445,084
Total Revenues $30,912,103
2 As per Sch. 10 of FIR
Town of Grimsby
Asset Management - Future Expenditures and Associated Revenues
2016 $
1 Non-Growth Related component of Projects including 10% mandatory
deduction on soft services
Page G-1
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Appendix G – Proposed Development
Charge By-law
Page G-2
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
The Corporation of the TOWN OF GRIMSBY
By-Law Number ___ -2016
A BY-LAW TO ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
FOR THE TOWN OF GRIMSBY
Whereas the Development Charges Act, 1997 (the “Act”) provides that the council of a
municipality may by by-law impose development charges against land to pay for
increased capital costs required because of increased needs for services;
And whereas a development charge background study has been completed in
accordance with the Act;
And whereas Council has before it a report entitled “Town of Grimsby Development
Charge Background Study” prepared by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. dated
September 1, 2016;
And whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Grimsby has given notice
of and held a public meeting on the 17th day of October, 2016 in accordance with the
Act and the regulations thereto;
Now therefore the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Grimsby hereby enacts as
follows:
1.0 Definitions
In this by-law, “Act” means the Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended, or any
successor thereto;
“Accessory use” means where used to describe a use, building or structure, that the
use, building or structure is naturally and normally incidental, subordinate in purpose of
floor area or both, and exclusively devoted to a principal use, building or structure;
“Apartment unit” means any residential dwelling unit within a building containing three
or more dwelling units where access to each residential unit is obtained through a
common entrance or entrances from the street level and the residential units are
connected by an interior corridor;
“Bedroom” means a habitable room larger than seven square metres, including a den,
study or other similar area, but does not include a living room, dining room or kitchen;
Page G-3
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
“Benefiting area” means an area defined by a map, plan or legal description in a front-
ending agreement as an area that will receive a benefit from the construction of a
service;
“Board of education” has the same meaning as that specified in the Education Act or
any successor thereto;
“Building Code Act” means the Building Code Act, 1992, as amended; or any
successor thereto;
“Capital cost” means costs incurred or proposed to be incurred by the municipality or a
local board thereof directly or by others on behalf of and as authorized by the
municipality or local board,
i) to acquire land or an interest in land, including a leasehold interest,
ii) to improve land,
iii) to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures,
iv) to acquire, construct or improve facilities including:
a. furniture and equipment other than computer equipment, and
b. materials acquired for circulation, reference or information purposes by a
library board as defined in the Public Libraries Act, and
c. rolling stock with an estimated useful life of seven years or more, and
v) to undertake studies in connection with any matter under the Act and any of the
matters in clauses (i) to (iv), including the development charge background study
required for the provision of services designated in this by-law within or outside
the municipality, including interest on borrowing for those expenditures under
clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) that are growth-related;
“Commercial” means any non-residential development not defined under “institutional”
or “industrial”
“Council” means the Council of the municipality;
“Development” means the construction, erection or placing of one or more buildings or
structures on land or the making of an addition or alteration to a building or structure
that has the effect of increasing the size or usability thereof, and includes
redevelopment;
“Development charge” means a charge imposed with respect to this by-law;
Page G-4
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
“Dwelling unit” means any part of a building or structure used, designed or intended to
be used as a domestic establishment in which one or more persons may sleep and are
provided with culinary and sanitary facilities for their exclusive use;
“Existing industrial building” means a building or buildings existing on site in the
Town of Grimsby on the day this by-law comes into effect or the first building
constructed and occupied on a vacant site pursuant to site plan approval under Section
41 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. c.P.13 of the Planning Act subsequent to this by-law
coming to effect for which fill development charges were paid, and is being used for or
in conjunction with,
i) the production, compounding, processing, packaging, crating, bottling, packing or
assembling of raw or semi-processed goods or materials in not less than
seventy-five percent of the total gross floor area of the building or buildings on a
site (“manufacturing”) or warehousing related to the manufacturing use carried on
in the building or buildings;
ii) research or development in connection with manufacturing in not less than
seventy-five percent of the total gross floor area of the building or buildings on a
site;
iii) retail sales by a manufacturer, if the retail sales are at the site where the
manufacturing is carried out, such retail sales are restricted to goods
manufactured at the site, and the building or part of a building where such retail
sales are carried out does not constitute greater than twenty-five percent of the
total gross floor area of the building or buildings on the site; or
iv) Office or administrative purposes, if they are,
a. carried out with respect to manufacturing or warehousing; and
b. In or attached to the building or structure used for such manufacturing or
warehousing;
“Farm building” means that part of a bona fide farming operation encompassing
barns, silos and other ancillary development to an agricultural use, but excluding a
residential use and would include wholesale greenhouse facilities and structures;
“Grade” means the average level of finished ground adjoining a building or structure at
all exterior walls;
“Gross floor area” means the total area of all floors above grade of a dwelling unit
measured between the outside surfaces of exterior walls or between the outside
Page G-5
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
surfaces of exterior walls and the centre line of party walls dividing the dwelling unit
from other dwelling unit or other portion of a building;
In the case of a non-residential building or structure, or in the case of a mixed-use
building or structure in respect of the non-residential portion thereof, the total area of all
building floors above or below grade measured between the outside surfaces of the
exterior walls, or between the outside surfaces of exterior walls and the centre line of
party walls dividing a non-residential use and a residential use, except for:
a room or enclosed area within the building or structure above or below grade
that is used exclusively for the accommodation of heating, cooling, ventilating,
electrical, mechanical or telecommunications equipment that service the building;
loading facilities above or below grade; and
a part of the building or structure below grade that is used for the parking of
motor vehicles or for storage or other accessory use;
“Industrial” means lands, buildings or structures used or designed or intended for use
for manufacturing, processing, fabricating or assembly of raw goods, transportation and
warehousing or bulk storage of goods, wineries and distilleries, utilities (electric and
gas), construction, and includes office uses and the sale of commodities to the general
public where such uses are accessory to an industrial use, but does not include the sale
of commodities to the general public through a warehouse club;
“Institutional” means lands, buildings or structures used or designed or intended for
use by an organized body, society or religious group for promoting a public or non-profit
purpose and shall include, but without limiting the generality of the foregoing, places of
worship, and special care facilities;
“Local board” has the same definition as defined in the Development Charges Act;
“Local services” means those services, facilities or things which are under the
jurisdiction of the municipality and are related to a plan of subdivision or within the area
to which the plan relates in respect of the lands under Sections 41, 51 or 53 of the
Planning Act as amended or any successor thereto;
“Mobile home” means any dwelling that is designed to be made mobile, and
constructed or manufactured to provide a permanent residence for one or more
persons, but does not include a travel trailer or tent trailer;
Page G-6
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
“Multiple dwellings” means all dwellings other than single-detached, semi-detached
and apartment house dwellings;
“Municipality” means The Corporation of the Town of Grimsby;
“Non-industrial” means all buildings or structures not defined as industrial;
“Non-residential use” means a building or structure of any kind whatsoever used,
designed or intended to be used for other than a residential use and includes all
commercial, industrial and institutional uses;
“Owner” means the owner of land or a person who has made application for an
approval for the development of land upon which a development charge is imposed;
“Place of worship” means that part of a building or structure that is exempt from
taxation as a place of worship under the Assessment Act, as amended or any
successor thereto;
“Regulation” means any regulation made pursuant to the Act;
“Residential use” means land or buildings or structures of any kind whatsoever used,
designed or intended to be used as living accommodations for one or more individuals;
“Semi-detached dwelling” means a dwelling unit in a residential building consisting of
two dwelling units having one vertical wall or one horizontal walls, but no other parts,
attached or another dwelling unit where the residential units are not connected by an
interior corridor;
“Services” (or “service”) means those services designated in Schedule “A” to this by-
law;
“Servicing agreement” means an agreement between a landowner and the
municipality relative to the provision of municipal services to specified lands within the
municipality;
“Single detached dwelling unit” means a residential building consisting of one
dwelling unit and not attached to another structure and includes mobile homes.
2.0 Designation of Services
2.1 The categories of services for which development charges are imposed under
this by-law are as follows:
Page G-7
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
a) Services Related to a Highway;
b) Other Transportation Services;
c) Fire Protection Services;
d) Administration Services;
e) Outdoor Recreation Services;
f) Indoor Recreation Services and Outdoor Recreation Services;
g) Library Services;
h) Water Services (Urban Area);
i) Wastewater Services (Urban Area); and
j) Storm Water Drainage and Control Services (Urban Area)
2.2 The components of the services designated in subsection 2.1 are described in
Schedule A.
3.0 Application of By-law Rules
3.1 Development charges shall be payable in the amounts set out in this by-law
where:
a) The lands are located in the area described in subsection 3.2; and
b) The development of the lands requires any of the approvals set out in subsection
3.4(a).
Area to Which By-law Applies
3.2 Subject to subsection 3.3, this by-law applies to all lands in the geographic area
of the Town of Grimsby.
3.3 This by-law shall not apply to lands that are owned by and used for the purposes
of:
a) The Town of Grimsby or a local board thereof;
b) A board as defined in section 1(1) of the Education Act;
c) The Region of Niagara or a local board thereof.
Approvals for Development
3.4 a) Development charges shall be imposed on all lands, buildings or structures that
are developed for residential or non-residential uses if the development requires,
Page G-8
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
i) The passing of a zoning by-law or of an amendment to a zoning by-law
under section 34 of the Planning Act;
ii) The approval of a minor variance under section 45 of the Planning Act;
iii) A conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under subsection 50(7) of
the Planning Act applies;
iv) The approval of a plan of subdivision under section 51 of the Planning Act;
v) A consent under section 53 of the Planning Act;
vi) The approval of a description under section 50 of the Condominium Act; or
vii) The issuing of a permit under the Building Code Act, 1992 in relation to a
building or structure.
b) No more than one development charge for each service designated in subsection
2.1 shall be imposed upon any lands, buildings or structures to which this by-law
applies even though two or more of the actions described in subsection 3.4(a)
are required before the lands, buildings or structures can be developed.
c) Despite subsection 3.4(b), if two or more of the actions described in subsection
3.4(a) occur at different times, additional development charges shall be imposed
if the subsequent action has the effect of increasing the need for services.
Exemptions
3.5.1 Notwithstanding the provisions of this by-law, development charges shall not be
imposed with respect to:
a) Development creating or adding an accessory use or accessory structure not
exceeding 10 square metres of gross floor area;
b) An enlargement of the gross floor area of an existing industrial building in
accordance with Section 4 of the Act;
c) The issuance of a building permit in accordance with Section 2(3) of the Act;
d) bona fide farm (non-residential) buildings including wholesale greenhouse
facilities and structures.
3.6 Rules with Respect to an Industrial Expansion Exemption
3.6.1 If a development includes the enlargement of the gross floor area of an existing
industrial building, the amount of the development charge that is payable in respect of
the enlargement is determined in accordance with the following:
Page G-9
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
i) Subject to subsection 3.6.1(iii), if the gross floor area is enlarged by 50 per cent
or less of the lesser of:
a. the gross floor area of the existing industrial building, or
b. the gross floor area of the existing industrial building before the first
enlargement for which:
i. an exemption from the payment of development charges was
granted, or
ii. a lesser development charge than would otherwise be payable
under this by-law, or predecessor thereof, was paid, pursuant to
Section 4 of the Act and this subsection, the amount of the
development charge in respect of the enlargement is zero;
ii) Subject to subsection 3.6.1(iii), if the gross floor area is enlarged by more than 50
per cent or less of the lesser of:
a. the gross floor area of the existing industrial building, or
b. the gross floor area of the existing industrial building before the first
enlargement for which:
i. an exemption from the payment of development charges was
granted, or
ii. a lesser development charge than would otherwise be payable
under this by-law, or predecessor thereof, was paid,
pursuant to Section 4 of the Act and this subsection,
the amount of the development charge in respect of the enlargement is the
amount of the development charge that would otherwise be payable multiplied by
the fraction determined as follows:
a. determine the amount by which the enlargement exceeds 50 per cent of
the gross floor area before the first enlargement, and
b. divide the amount determined under subsection (A) by the amount of the
enlargement
iii) For the purposes of calculating the extent to which the gross floor area of an
existing industrial building is enlarged in subsection 3.6.1(ii), the cumulative
gross floor area of any previous enlargements for which:
a. an exemption from the payment of development charges was granted, or
b. a lesser development charge than would otherwise be payable under this
by-law, or predecessor thereof, was paid,
pursuant to Section 4 of the Act and this subsection, shall be added to the
calculation of the gross floor area of the proposed enlargement.
Page G-10
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
For the purposes of this subsection, the enlargement must not be attached to the
existing industrial building by means only of a tunnel, bridge, passageway,
canopy, shared below grade connection, such as a service tunnel, foundation,
footing or parking facility.
Residential
3.8 The development charges described in Schedule B to this by-law shall be
imposed on residential uses of lands, buildings or structures, including a dwelling unit
accessory to a non-residential use and, in the case of a mixed use building or structure,
on the residential uses in the mixed use building or structure, according to the type of
unit, and calculated with respect to each of the services according to the type of
residential use.
Non-Residential Uses
3.9 The development charges described in Schedule B to this by-law shall be
imposed on non-residential uses of lands, buildings or structures, and, in the case of a
mixed use building or structure, on the non-residential uses in the mixed use building or
structure, and calculated with respect to each of the services according to the gross
floor area of the non-residential use.
Reduction of Development Charges with Respect to Redevelopment
3.10 Despite any other provision of this by-law, where, as a result of the
redevelopment of land, a building or structure existing on the same land within 48
months prior to the date of payment of development charges in regard to such
redevelopment was, or is to be demolished, in whole or in part, or converted from one
principal use to another principal use on the same land, in order to facilitate the
redevelopment, the development charges otherwise payable with respect to such
redevelopment shall be reduced by the following amounts:
a) in the case of a residential building or structure, or in the case of a mixed-use
building or structure, the residential uses in the mixed-use building or structure,
an amount calculated by multiplying the applicable development charge under
subsections 3.6 and 3.7 and of this by-law by the number, according to type, of
dwelling units that have been or will be demolished or converted to another
principal use; and provided that such amounts shall not exceed, in total, the
amount of the development charges otherwise payable with respect to the
redevelopment.
Page G-11
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Time of Payment of Development Charges
3.11 Development charges imposed under this section are payable upon issuance of
a building permit with respect to each dwelling unit, building or structure.
3.12 Notwithstanding Section 3.11, provided that a site plan has been registered for
the Development and the Town Manager (or his/her designate) has recommended in
writing or email that the development charges be deferred, the Mayor (or in his/her
absence Deputy Mayor) and the Treasurer (or in his/her absence Deputy Treasurer) are
authorized to jointly sign on behalf of the Town an agreement between the Town and
the Owner to defer the Development Charges, in whole or in part, for that Development
for up to six months, after which the charges shall become due immediately. Copies of
all such agreements shall be forwarded to Council for their information. By entering into
such an agreement the Owner is explicitly agreeing that any Development Charges that
remain unpaid two weeks following the expiration of the deferment may be added, at the
sole discretion of the Town, to the tax roll(s) related to the Development, in a manner
deemed appropriate by the Town, and collected in the same manner as taxes.
4.0 Payment by Services
4.1 Despite the payments required under subsection 3.11, Council may, by
agreement, give a credit towards a development charge in exchange for work that
relates to a service for which a development charge is imposed under this by-law.
5.0 Indexing
5.1 Development charges imposed pursuant to this by-law shall be adjusted
annually, without amendment to this by-law, commencing on the first anniversary date
of this by-law and each anniversary date thereafter, in accordance with the Act.
6.0 Schedules
6.1 The following schedules to this by-law form an integral part thereof:
Schedule A - Components of Services Designated in subsection 2.1
Schedule B - Residential and Non-Residential Development Charges
Schedule C - Map denoting where Development Charges are imposed
7.0 Date By-law in Force
Page G-12
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
7.1 This by-law shall come into force on the 8th day of November, 2016.
8.0 Date By-law Expires
8.1 This by-law will expire on the 8th day of November, 2021, unless it is repealed at
an earlier date.
9.0 Repeal
9.1 By-law No. 14-84, as amended is hereby repealed upon passage of this by-law.
Read a first time this 7th day of November, 2016.
Read a second and third time and finally passed this 7th day of November, 2016.
R.N. Bentley, Mayor
Derik Brandt, Town Manager
Page G-13
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Schedule A to By-law 16-__ Designated Town Services under This By-law
Town-wide Services
1. Services Related to a Highway and Related Infrastructure
a. Roads, Sidewalks, Streetlights
b. Depots and Domes
c. Rolling Stock
2. Parking Services
a. Parking
3. Fire Protection Services
a. Fire Stations
b. Fire Vehicles
c. Small Equipment and Gear
4. Administration
a. Studies
5. Indoor and Outdoor Recreation Services
a. Parkland Development, Amenities and Trails
b. Parks Vehicles and Equipment
c. Recreation Facilities
6. Library Services
a. Library Facilities
b. Library Materials
Urban Services
7. Wastewater Services
a. Sewers
8. Water Services
a. Distribution
9. Storm Water Drainage and Control Services
a. Channels, Drainage and Ponds
Page G-14
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
SCHEDULE "B"
BY-LAW NO. 2016 - _____
SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
Single and Semi-
Detached Dwelling
Apartments - 2
Bedrooms +
Apartments -
Bachelor and 1
Bedroom
Other Multiples
Industrial
(per ft² of Gross
Floor Area)
Non-Industrial
(per ft² of Gross Floor
Area)
Municipal Wide Services:
Services Related to a Highway and Related Infrastructure 9,358 5,568 3,702 6,308 2.46 5.49
Parking Services 37 22 15 25 0.01 0.02
Fire Protection Services 782 465 309 527 0.20 0.46
Indoor and Outdoor Recreation Services 4,831 2,874 1,911 3,256 0.28 0.63
Library Services 771 459 305 520 0.04 0.10
Administration 197 117 78 133 0.05 0.12
Total Municipal Wide Services 15,976 9,505 6,320 10,769 3.04 6.82
Urban Services
Stormwater Drainage and Control Services 320 190 127 216 0.16 0.36
Wastewater Services - - - - 0.00 0.00
Water Services 563 335 223 379 0.12 0.26
Total Urban Services 883 525 350 595 0.28 0.62
GRAND TOTAL RURAL AREA 15,976 9,505 6,320 10,769 3.04 6.82
GRAND TOTAL URBAN AREA 16,859 10,030 6,670 11,364 3.32 7.44
RESIDENTIAL
Service
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Page G-15
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. H:\Grimsby\2016 DC\Report\DC Report.docx
Schedule C to By-law ____ Urban Serviced Lands for Which Full Development Charges Apply