Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

35
3. New metrics 2. Assets, not targets 1. Services, not products Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement Giulio Quaggiotto Practice Leader, Knowledge and Innovation UNDP

description

 

Transcript of Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

Page 1: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

3. New metrics2. Assets, not targets1. Services, not products

Towards policy making 2.0:Rethinking public engagement

Giulio QuaggiottoPractice Leader, Knowledge and Innovation

UNDP

Page 2: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

http://www.ted.com/talks/dave_meslin_the_antidote_to_apathy.html

Exclusion by design?

Page 3: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

Source: http://gregcfuzion.w

ordpress.com

Page 4: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

Exclusion by design?

Page 5: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement
Page 6: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement
Page 7: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

http://vimeo.com/43448446#

Source: textizen.com; http://technicallyphilly.com/

Page 8: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

Source: http://w

ww

.punjabmodel.gov.pk/

Page 9: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement
Page 10: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement
Page 11: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement
Page 12: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

3. New metrics2. Assets, not targets1. Services, not products

Page 13: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

Source: http://goo.gl/RO

lJm

Page 14: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement
Page 15: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

6 things that only citizens can offer to governments

Source: http://egov20.wordpress.com/2011/11/22/6-things-only-citizens-can-offer-to-government (adapted)

1.IT skills (e.g. hackthegovernment, manabass.lv)2.Specific thematic knowledge (e.g peertopatent)3.Experience as users of public services (e.g.

patientsopinion)4.Pervasive geographic coverage (e.g. fixmystreet)5.Trust6.Many eyes and many hands (e.g. digitaltoolkit)

Page 16: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18067650

“The best public transport expert is the lady who takes the bus to work every day”

Page 17: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

More than 16,000 citizen “solvers”

Page 18: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

Re-thinking public servicesaround what citizens know best

IDENTIFICATION

RESOLUTION

VERIFICATION

Page 19: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

Shifting from tools to values

TOOLS• Open data• Social networks• Crowdsourcing• Visualisation• Simulation and

modeling• Serious games

VALUES• Open up to external contributions

earlier in the process• Enable peer-to-peer

collaboration between participants

• Design for unexpected questions/contributions (Raw data, open questions)

• Be very clear and usable when you ask for help

• Account for real humans not simplified abstract entities

Source: @osimod, http://crossover-project.eu (adapted)

Page 20: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

A little quiz…

Which is the first country in the world to have tweeted its budget?

Page 21: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement
Page 22: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

The litmus test

Source: ns.umich.edu

Page 23: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

There’s no shortcut

“You cannot be 2.0 outside if you are barely 1.0 inside”

- Euan Semple -

Page 24: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

3. New metrics2. Assets, not targets1. Services, not products

Policy making 2.0

Page 25: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

Source : CC Elaine Faith http://goo.gl/lgZw

4

Page 26: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

Many new tools are available….

•93% of crowdmaps had fewer than 10 reports

•94% of crowdmaps had only one user

Source: Crowdglobe, Sep 2012

Page 27: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

The 100% participation myth

“ 1% of the participants wrote more than 50 contributions, while the majority left only one”

EU Digital Agenda Consultation

(Source: EU Sharp, Sep 2012)

Page 28: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

An example from the UK- they work for you

• Cost: 2-3,000 £• 2-300,000 visits per month• 60% of users never looked up information on

what their representatives were doing before• 2% of visits from the parliament itself• Very strong bias towards maleeducated & high income groups

Source: Mysociety.org

Page 29: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

No one-size fits all

Source: http://blog.okfn.org

Page 30: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

Participation ≠ being on facebook

Source: Watcher.com.ua

Page 31: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, Aug 2012

Page 32: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

New metrics?

Source: Harvard Complexity and Social Networks blog http://goo.gl/e5AAP

Page 33: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

NudgesSource: fitbit.com

Page 34: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FFRoYhTJQQ&utm_source=buffer&buffer_share=cc1ef

Product or service?

Page 35: Towards policy making 2.0: Rethinking public engagement

United Nations Development Programme

Follow us:

Development inEurope and

Central Asia

@UNDP_Europe_CIS

@gquaggiotto