TOWARD ACCURATE SMALL PHOTON FIELD DOSIMETRY USING RADIOCHROMIC FILM
-
Upload
national-physical-laboratory -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of TOWARD ACCURATE SMALL PHOTON FIELD DOSIMETRY USING RADIOCHROMIC FILM
-
7/27/2019 TOWARD ACCURATE SMALL PHOTON FIELD DOSIMETRY USING RADIOCHROMIC FILM
1/1
QueensPrinterandControllerof
HMSO
,2014
.
10990/0814
www.npl.co.uk
The purpose of this work is to develop and validate a reliablemethod for characterizing small fields on radiotherapymachines with radiochromic film. A novel multichannelanalysis method is proposed that focuses on correcting filmsystematic errors introduced by manufacturing imperfections.
To validate the technique, a controlled experimentalenvironment is used. Initial results show that the performanceof the method is promising, suggesting potential future forsmall field dosimetry.
Methods:
A. Experimental set up
A Cobalt-60 beamis used to irradiate
radiochromic films
(Gafchromic
EBT-3) homogenously,
allowing the
determination of
parameters for the film
scanner homogeneity
correction,
multichannel analysis
and film dose response
calibration. The setup is shown in Figure 1, while the homogeneity of a
profile across the film at an SSD of 430 cm in Figure 2.
B. Multichannel method
Prior to performing the multichannel analysis, a correction is applied to
the film to account for the scanner light inhomogeneity (see Figure 3). A
multichannel method developed from first principles and based on the
statistical behaviour of optical density for a given dose is then appliedto correct for defects in film emulsion thickness uniformity. This method
allows the film response to be characterised in terms of dose and thickness
perturbation, as shown in Figure 4. By applying the multichannel correction,
as shown in Figure 6, a perturbation and dose index map was extracted, thus
allowing the image to be corrected and the film calibration to dose to be
performed (see Figure 5).
Validation of the method:
The performance of the method is validated against experimental
measurements of dose distributions in a Cobalt-60 beam. Beam profiles
(Figures 7 and 9), as well as percent depth dose distributions (Figures 8 and
10), are measured and used to compare the proposed method with one
using single channel analysis (red only). Results with the new method show
a significant improvement compared to the single channel method, withsystematic errors being reduced by a factor of up to 3.
Conclusion and future work:The proposed method based on multichannel analysis is promising for
applications requiring high accuracy, such as in the characterization of small
fields. Future work requires further validation of the method against other
detectors as well as Monte Carlo calculation.
References:
1) Alfonso et al. A new formalism for reference dosimetry of small and nonstandard
fields. Med. Phys. 35 (2008);
2) Bouchard et al. On the characterization and uncertainty analysis of radiochromic
film dosimetry, 36 (2009);
3) Chung et al. Investigation of three radiation detectors for accurate measurement
of absorbed dose in nonstandard fields, 37 (2010);
4) Micke et al. Multichannel film dosimetry with nonuniformity correction,
Med. Phys. 38 (2011);5) Saur and Frengen, GafChromic EBT film dosimetry with flatbed CCD scanner
Med. Phys. 35 (2008)
Figure 1: Cobalt-60 film irradiation set up.
TOWARD ACCURATE SMALL PHOTON FIELDDOSIMETRY USING RADIOCHROMIC FILM
Billas I, Silvestre I, Bouchard HRadiation Dosimetry Group, National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LW, UK
Figure 2: Raw signal profile from a homogenously
irradiated film.
Figure 3: Scanner homogeneity correction matrix.
Figure 4: 2D characterization of the film response to dose
and thickness perturbation.
Figure 5: EBT-3 film response curve.
Figure 6 : Image, thickness perturbation and dose index map.
Figure 7: Cobalt-60 beam profile comparison between single and multi channel analysis (horizontal
on the left and vertical on the right).
Figure 8: Cobalt-60 PDD profile comparison between single and multi channel analysis.
Figure 9: A 10 x 10 cm2Cobalt-60 dose distribution. Figure 10: 2D images of a Cobalt-60 PDD.