TORREFACTION OF AGRICULTURAL AND …...Torrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a...

16
TORREFACTION OF AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY FEEDSTOCKS IN A PILOT SCALE FACILITY: COMPARISON OF MASS AND ENERGY BALANCES T. Melkior, M. Perez, S. Thiéry, P. Ponsdevincent, A. Chatroux, M. Gonzalez Martinez, C. Dupont

Transcript of TORREFACTION OF AGRICULTURAL AND …...Torrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a...

TORREFACTION OF AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRYFEEDSTOCKS IN A PILOT SCALE FACILITY:COMPARISON OF MASS AND ENERGY BALANCEST. Melkior, M. Perez, S. Thiéry, P. Ponsdevincent,A. Chatroux, M. Gonzalez Martinez, C. Dupont

2

Biomass torrefaction

GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances

200– 300°C

P(atm)10min– 1h

Inert atmosphere

§ ↑heating value

§ hydrophobic

§ ↑flowability

§ ↑grindability

§ usesRaw biomass

Torrefiedsolid

Gaseous products

§ harmful fortheprocess

§ chemicals (added value)

↓transportcost

Energy

Chemicals

Materials

~70%mass

Permanentgases (CO,CO2)

Volatilespecies (furans,ketones,phenols)

3

Biomass torrefaction upscaling

GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances

Mobile Flip WP 2.4. Torrefaction Mobile Flip WP 3à Next presentation

This presentationàPresentation 242 and poster 534

4

Objectives

÷Studying biomass torrefaction behavior in large-scale tests:• Biomass conveying• Mass balances• Energy balances

÷Large-scale production of torrefied biomasses for testing new applicationsof the torrefied products:

• Pelletizing à presentation 445 -298

• Soil amendment à presentation 442

• Particle boards manufacturing à oral flash/poster 480

GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances

5

Génépi research facility

GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances

Grinding

Torrefaction

Gasification

6

Centorré torrefaction oven

GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances

7

Centorré torrefaction oven

GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances

Feedinghopper

(dry biomass)

Natural gasCH4

O2

N2

Gas topost-combustion

Outlet flowto the container

.

Air cooler

Multiple-hearth torrefactionfurnace

- Temperature: 200-350°C

- Mass flow: 50-150 kg/h

- Atmospheric pressure

- Feedstock: chips or pellets:

wood, agricultural residues,non-hazardous waste

- Moisture < 10 % (after drying)

8

Centorré torrefaction oven

GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances

Centorré scheme oftheoven

Rabbling system

Centorré (2soils) Post-combustion

9

Composition of the products

GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances

÷Solid product: mass loss ajusted by:• Temperature• Residence time (related to the speed of rotation of the oven)

÷Gaseous products:

• Gases include He (tracer gas) and combustion-derived gases from the burners (H2O, CO2 and residual CH4)

• Water (~ 80% of the total condensable species)

• Dry condensables (cold trap + GC/FID):

• Dry permanent gases (µ-GC):

• N2: 80%

• CO2: 10%

• CO: 2-3%

• O2: 2-3 %

• Traces of H2, CH4, C2H4,

C2H6, C3H8 and H2.

10

Materials tested and operating conditions

GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances

Wheat strawBeech Poplar

250°C, 75 minutes

Ope

ratin

gco

nditi

ons

250°C, 75 minutes

250°C, 90 minutes

280°C, 30 minutes

280°C, 60 minutes

250°C, 20 minutes

250°C, 60 minutes

15 mm: 250°C, 75 min

15 mm: 260°C, 45 min

30 mm: 250°C, 75 min

Corn cob

11

Biomass conveying

GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances

Poplar250°C, 90 minutes

Wheat straw250°C, 20 minutes

12

Mass and energy balances

GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances

CENTORRE

Flow rateCHO contents

LHV

Gas analysis: N2, CO2, CO, O2, CH4He content => gas flow rateCondensables: trapping and analysis

Torrefiedbiomass

Gas andvolatiles

At each level: gas and floortemperature

flow ratewater contentC, H, O contentsLHV

Gas flow rates

Depression into the oven

Gas flow rate

Biomass

Air + natural gas

Air entries (leaks)

He

N2 sweeping

Air entries (biomass)

13

Mass balance: example for beech

GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances

CENTORRE

Biomass

Air + natural gas

Air entries

He

Torrefied biomass Gas + volatile species

136 - 168 kg/hWater content: 9 - 7 %

100 - 129 kg/hMass loss: 20%db

N2 sweeping2.4 Nm3/h

0.15 Nm3/h

3.3 - 3.8 Nm3/h31 - 35 Nm3/h

12.4 Nm3/h

Air entries (biomass)0.2 - 0.3 Nm3/h

0.5 kg / Nm3 (db)Water content: 80%m

(dry gases)51 - 57 Nm3/h

250°C, 75 min

14

Energy balance

GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances

T

Resid

ence

time

Wat

erco

nten

t

Inle

tmas

sflo

w

Inle

tdry

biom

ass

Inle

tWat

er

Wat

erhe

atin

g

Wat

erev

apor

atin

g

Stea

mh

eatin

g

Solid

heat

ing

Tota

lre

quire

d

Net

natu

ral

gas

cons

umpt

ion

Net

ener

gysu

pplie

d

Biomass °C tmin %db kg/h Kg/h Kg/h MJ/h MJ/h MJ/h MJ/h MJ/h Nm3/h MJ/h

Poplar chips

250 75 4.5% 156 149 7 2.3 15.8 2.1 44.5 65 1.63 67

250 90 3.0% 158 153 5 1.6 10.7 1.4 45.8 60 1.04 43

280 30 4.0% 129 124 5 1.7 11.6 1.9 41.9 57 1.46 60

280 60 4.5% 127 121 6 1.9 12.9 2.1 41.0 58 1.81 74

Corn cob 30mm 250 75 8.0% 171 157 14 4.6 30.9 4.1 47.0 87 1.47 60

Corn cob 15mm250 75 8.0% 180 166 14 4.8 32.5 4.3 49.5 91 2.1 86

260 45 8.0% 183 168 15 4.9 33.0 4.7 52.5 95

Beech chips 250 75 9.40% 136 123 13 4.3 28.9 3.8 36.8 74 1.4 57

Wheat straw 250 20 10.0% 95 86 10 3.2 21.4 2.9 25.6 53 1.1 45

15

Conclusions

÷Large-scale production of torrefied biomasses succesful÷Comparison of biomass conveying (woody/agricultural biomasses)÷Difficulties in wheat straw conveying

÷Final mass loss of the torrefied biomasses:÷Adjusted through operating coniditions÷Depedent on biomass properties (composition, moisture)

÷Preliminary study for mobile unit design

GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances

Perspectives

÷Torrefaction tests on sunflower seed shells÷Improving biomass conveying

16

Click to add titlehttp://www.cea.fr/cea-tech/liten/genepi

contact details:[email protected]

[email protected]

Thank you for your attention

Gre

nobl

e(F

ranc

e)