TORREFACTION OF AGRICULTURAL AND …...Torrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a...
Transcript of TORREFACTION OF AGRICULTURAL AND …...Torrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a...
TORREFACTION OF AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRYFEEDSTOCKS IN A PILOT SCALE FACILITY:COMPARISON OF MASS AND ENERGY BALANCEST. Melkior, M. Perez, S. Thiéry, P. Ponsdevincent,A. Chatroux, M. Gonzalez Martinez, C. Dupont
2
Biomass torrefaction
GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances
200– 300°C
P(atm)10min– 1h
Inert atmosphere
§ ↑heating value
§ hydrophobic
§ ↑flowability
§ ↑grindability
§ usesRaw biomass
Torrefiedsolid
Gaseous products
§ harmful fortheprocess
§ chemicals (added value)
↓transportcost
Energy
Chemicals
Materials
~70%mass
Permanentgases (CO,CO2)
Volatilespecies (furans,ketones,phenols)
3
Biomass torrefaction upscaling
GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances
Mobile Flip WP 2.4. Torrefaction Mobile Flip WP 3à Next presentation
This presentationàPresentation 242 and poster 534
4
Objectives
÷Studying biomass torrefaction behavior in large-scale tests:• Biomass conveying• Mass balances• Energy balances
÷Large-scale production of torrefied biomasses for testing new applicationsof the torrefied products:
• Pelletizing à presentation 445 -298
• Soil amendment à presentation 442
• Particle boards manufacturing à oral flash/poster 480
GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances
5
Génépi research facility
GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances
Grinding
Torrefaction
Gasification
6
Centorré torrefaction oven
GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances
7
Centorré torrefaction oven
GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances
Feedinghopper
(dry biomass)
Natural gasCH4
O2
N2
Gas topost-combustion
Outlet flowto the container
.
Air cooler
Multiple-hearth torrefactionfurnace
- Temperature: 200-350°C
- Mass flow: 50-150 kg/h
- Atmospheric pressure
- Feedstock: chips or pellets:
wood, agricultural residues,non-hazardous waste
- Moisture < 10 % (after drying)
8
Centorré torrefaction oven
GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances
Centorré scheme oftheoven
Rabbling system
Centorré (2soils) Post-combustion
9
Composition of the products
GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances
÷Solid product: mass loss ajusted by:• Temperature• Residence time (related to the speed of rotation of the oven)
÷Gaseous products:
• Gases include He (tracer gas) and combustion-derived gases from the burners (H2O, CO2 and residual CH4)
• Water (~ 80% of the total condensable species)
• Dry condensables (cold trap + GC/FID):
• Dry permanent gases (µ-GC):
• N2: 80%
• CO2: 10%
• CO: 2-3%
• O2: 2-3 %
• Traces of H2, CH4, C2H4,
C2H6, C3H8 and H2.
10
Materials tested and operating conditions
GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances
Wheat strawBeech Poplar
250°C, 75 minutes
Ope
ratin
gco
nditi
ons
250°C, 75 minutes
250°C, 90 minutes
280°C, 30 minutes
280°C, 60 minutes
250°C, 20 minutes
250°C, 60 minutes
15 mm: 250°C, 75 min
15 mm: 260°C, 45 min
30 mm: 250°C, 75 min
Corn cob
11
Biomass conveying
GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances
Poplar250°C, 90 minutes
Wheat straw250°C, 20 minutes
12
Mass and energy balances
GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances
CENTORRE
Flow rateCHO contents
LHV
Gas analysis: N2, CO2, CO, O2, CH4He content => gas flow rateCondensables: trapping and analysis
Torrefiedbiomass
Gas andvolatiles
At each level: gas and floortemperature
flow ratewater contentC, H, O contentsLHV
Gas flow rates
Depression into the oven
Gas flow rate
Biomass
Air + natural gas
Air entries (leaks)
He
N2 sweeping
Air entries (biomass)
13
Mass balance: example for beech
GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances
CENTORRE
Biomass
Air + natural gas
Air entries
He
Torrefied biomass Gas + volatile species
136 - 168 kg/hWater content: 9 - 7 %
100 - 129 kg/hMass loss: 20%db
N2 sweeping2.4 Nm3/h
0.15 Nm3/h
3.3 - 3.8 Nm3/h31 - 35 Nm3/h
12.4 Nm3/h
Air entries (biomass)0.2 - 0.3 Nm3/h
0.5 kg / Nm3 (db)Water content: 80%m
(dry gases)51 - 57 Nm3/h
250°C, 75 min
14
Energy balance
GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances
T
Resid
ence
time
Wat
erco
nten
t
Inle
tmas
sflo
w
Inle
tdry
biom
ass
Inle
tWat
er
Wat
erhe
atin
g
Wat
erev
apor
atin
g
Stea
mh
eatin
g
Solid
heat
ing
Tota
lre
quire
d
Net
natu
ral
gas
cons
umpt
ion
Net
ener
gysu
pplie
d
Biomass °C tmin %db kg/h Kg/h Kg/h MJ/h MJ/h MJ/h MJ/h MJ/h Nm3/h MJ/h
Poplar chips
250 75 4.5% 156 149 7 2.3 15.8 2.1 44.5 65 1.63 67
250 90 3.0% 158 153 5 1.6 10.7 1.4 45.8 60 1.04 43
280 30 4.0% 129 124 5 1.7 11.6 1.9 41.9 57 1.46 60
280 60 4.5% 127 121 6 1.9 12.9 2.1 41.0 58 1.81 74
Corn cob 30mm 250 75 8.0% 171 157 14 4.6 30.9 4.1 47.0 87 1.47 60
Corn cob 15mm250 75 8.0% 180 166 14 4.8 32.5 4.3 49.5 91 2.1 86
260 45 8.0% 183 168 15 4.9 33.0 4.7 52.5 95
Beech chips 250 75 9.40% 136 123 13 4.3 28.9 3.8 36.8 74 1.4 57
Wheat straw 250 20 10.0% 95 86 10 3.2 21.4 2.9 25.6 53 1.1 45
15
Conclusions
÷Large-scale production of torrefied biomasses succesful÷Comparison of biomass conveying (woody/agricultural biomasses)÷Difficulties in wheat straw conveying
÷Final mass loss of the torrefied biomasses:÷Adjusted through operating coniditions÷Depedent on biomass properties (composition, moisture)
÷Preliminary study for mobile unit design
GONZALEZ MARTINEZ MaríaTorrefaction of agricultural and forestry feedstocks in a pilot scale facility: comparison of mass and energy balances
Perspectives
÷Torrefaction tests on sunflower seed shells÷Improving biomass conveying
16
Click to add titlehttp://www.cea.fr/cea-tech/liten/genepi
contact details:[email protected]
Thank you for your attention
Gre
nobl
e(F
ranc
e)