Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
Transcript of Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
1/43
Topic 12Contingency Theories
& SituationalLeadership
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
2/43
The Contingency Approach The essence of the contingency approach to
leadership is that leaders are most effective when they make their behavior contingent uponsituational forces, including group membercharacteristics.
Leadership effectiveness is maximized whenleaders correctly make their behaviorscontingent on certain situational and followercharacteristics.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
3/43
The Contingency Approach (cont.)
The effects of leadership vary from situation tosituation. Aspects of the situation that enhanceor nullify the effects of a leaders traits or behavior are called situational moderator variables.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
4/43
The Contingency Approach (cont.) Normative Decision Model
(Vroom, Yetton / Vroom,Yetton, and Jago)
The Situational Leadership Theory (Hershey and Blanchard)
Fiedlers Contingency Theory
The Path-Goal Theory (House, et.al.)
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
5/43
Contigency Approach (cont) The four theories share several similarities:
They are theories rather than someones personal opinions . They implicitly assume that leaders are able to accurately diagnose or
assess key aspects of the followers and the leadership situation. With the exception of the contingency model, leaders are assumed to
be able to act in a flexible manner. A correct match between situational and follower characteristicsand leaders behavior is assumed to have a positive effect on groupor organizational outcomes.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
6/43
Normative Decision Model The Normative Decision Model views leadership
as a decision-making process. It specifies what aleader ought to do in a given situation. It issolely directed at determining the amount ofsubordinate input in the decision-makingprocess. Normative refers to the idea that the
leader should follow certain prescriptionsindicated in the model. Two key factors in the model are decision quality
and decision acceptance.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
7/43
Normative Decision Model (cont.) Decision quality refers to the objective aspects of
a decision that affect group or individualperformance. When an effective alternative ischosen, decision quality is said to be high.
Decision quality is not important when theconsequences of choosing various alternativesare about the same, or when the consequences ofthe decision are unimportant.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
8/43
Normative Decision Model (cont.) Decision acceptance refers to how committed
group members are to implementing a decisioneffectively. If group members are responsiblefor implementing a decision, acceptance iscrucial. At times decision acceptance is not an
issue because very few employees are involved inimplementation.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
9/43
Normative Decision Model (cont.) The model identifies 5 levels of leader-
subordinate (follower) participation: AI- leader decides completely alone AII- leader obtains information from subordinates,
leader decides CI- Leader shares problem individually with
subordinates, obtains opinions, leader decides. CII- leader shares problem collectively with
subordinates, obtains opinions, leader decides. GII- leader shares problem with group, group decides.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
10/43
Normative Decision Model (cont.) A decision tree is required to implement the
model. The leader diagnoses situational variables by considering key questions.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
11/43
Normative Decision Model (cont.) The Decision Tree- provides a branching set of
questions to be answered either yes or no which lead to a set of decision processes that willprotect quality and acceptance. Time andsubordinate development may be factored in ifof importance AFTER ensuring quality and
acceptance by using the decision tree.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
12/43
The Decision Tree
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
13/43
Evaluation of the Model: Pro:
Supported by numerous empirical studies Prompts leaders to ask themselves intelligent,
perceptive, focused questions Following step-by-step procedures increases
decision-making effectiveness
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
14/43
Evaluation of the Model (cont.) : Con:
Decision processes are treated as a single, discrete
episode that occur at one point in time Being a good decision-maker is not enough to be a
good leader Excludes trial- balloon approaches to decision -
making (leader floating tentative decisions) More about management than about leadership, and
therefore has little to do with inspiring and influencingothers and bringing about important changes
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
15/43
Situational Leadership Theory The Situational Leadership Theory explains how
to match leadership style with followerreadiness.
The key contingency factors are group membercharacteristics.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
16/43
Situational Leadership Theory (cont.)
The theory has its roots in the Ohio State Studieson Leader Behavior.
That study identified 2 distinct leader behaviorcategories: Initiating structure (task behavior)
Consideration (relationship behavior)
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
17/43
Basics of the Model Task behavior is the extent to which the leader
spells out the duties and responsibilities of anindividual or group.
Relationship behavior is the extent to whichthe leader engages in two-way or multi-way
communication.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
18/43
The Situational Leadership Theorydeveloped by Hershey and Blanchard,answers the following questions:
Is there an optimum way for leaders to adjusttheir behavior with different followers andthereby increase their likelihood of success?
If so, then what factors should the leader basehis behavior on?
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
19/43
The Answer: Answer is that leaders adapt their style or behavior based on he maturity of their followers.
The most effective style depends on thereadiness level of group members.
Readiness is the extent to which a follower isable and willing to accomplish a specific task.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
20/43
Components of Follower Maturity Job maturity- the amount of task-relevant
knowledge, experience, skill, and ability that thefollower possesses. (i.e. ability, KSAs)
Psychological maturity- the followers selfconfidence, commitment, motivation, and self-respect relative to the task at hand (i.e. willingness)
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
21/43
Four Levels of Readiness
Style 1 - High task and low relationship. The telling style isdirective.
Style 2 - High task and high relationship. The selling styleis also directive, but in a more persuasive, guiding, manner.
Style3 - High relationship and low task. In theparticipating leadership style there is less direction and
more collaboration between leader and group members.
Style 4 - Low relationship and low task. In the delegatingstyle, the leader delegates and is kept informed of progress.
TM 13-6 SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP THEORY
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
22/43
TM 13 6 SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP THEORY
3 2
4 1
High Rel.Low task
Low Rel.Low task
High TaskHigh Rel.
High TaskLow Rel.
(LOW) (HIGH)TASK BEHAVIOR
( S u p p o r t i v e B e h a v i
o r )
R E L A T I O N S H
I P B E H A V I O R
( H I G H
)
R4 R3 R2 R1
FOLLOWER READINESSMODERATEHIGH LO
W
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
23/43
Hersey and Blanchards SituationalLeadership Model
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
24/43
The Situational Leadership Model Caveat Any given follower could be low on
readiness to perform one task buthigh on readiness to perform adifferent task .
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
25/43
Evaluation of the Theory: Best used with new hires Can be valuable in training and development Based on fundamental truth about leadership:
Competent people require the least specificdirection
Gives false impression that all situations areclear-cut
Popular because of its commonsense approach but not a lot of empirical research to support its validity
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
26/43
Evaluation (cont)
Situational Leadership is a useful way to
get leaders to think about howleadership effectiveness may dependsomewhat on being flexible with
different subordinates, not on acting thesame way toward them all.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
27/43
The Contingency Model Fiedlers contingency theory of leadership states
that best leadership style is determined by thesituation in which the leader works.
It recognizes natural behavioral tendencies ofleaders and suggests certain situations where
these behaviors may be more or less effective. Probably the earliest and certainly the most well-known contingency theory.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
28/43
Some leaders may be generally more supportive andrelationship-oriented , whereas others may be moreconcerned with task or goal accomplishment .
The contingency model suggests that leader
effectiveness is primarily determined by selecting theright kind of leader for a certain situation orchanging the situation to fit the particular leadersstyle.
To understand the contingency theory one must lookfirst at the critical characteristics of the leader and then at the critical aspects of the situation .
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
29/43
Least Preferred Coworker Scale To measure leadership style the theory uses an
instrument called the Least-Preferred-CoworkerScale (LPC)
LPC Handout
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
30/43
LPC Scale
The scale instructs a leader to think of thesingle individual with whom he has had thegreatest difficulty working and then todescribe that individual in terms of a series of
bipolar activities. Based on their LPC scores, leaders arecategorized into two groups: Low-LPC leaders (primarily motivated by task ) High-LPC leaders (primarily motivated by
relationships )
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
31/43
Scale Interpretation One who describes the least preferred coworker
in favorable terms is relationship-motivated. Incontrast, a person who describes his or her leastpreferred coworker unfavorably tends to be task-motivated.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
32/43
Motivational Hierarchies For Low- andHigh-LPC Leaders
Task
People
Low-LPC leader motivationalhierarchy
People
Task
High-LPC leader motivationalhierarchy
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
33/43
Situation Dimensions: The situation is assessed to determine the degreeof situational control, or favorability, for the leaderusing three dimensions:
1. Leader-member relations measures how well the groupand the leader get along. 2. Task structure measures how clearly the procedures,
goals, and evaluation of the job are defined. 3. Position power measures how much authority the
leader possesses. Leader-member relations contribute as much tothe favorability of the leadership situation as dotask structure and position power combined.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
34/43
Contingency Model Octant Structure ForDetermining Situational Favorability
Good Poor
Structured Unstructured Structured Unstructured
High Low High Low High Low High Low
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Leader-member
relations
Task structure
Position power
Octant
Overall situation favorability
High Low
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
35/43
Fiedlers Contingency Model
GOOD POOR
HIGH LO W HIGH LOW
S W S W S W S W
Leader-Member
Relations
TaskStructure
PositionPower
Kinds ofLeadershipSituations
VeryFavorable
VeryUnfavorable
I II III IV V VI VII VIII1
Relationship-oriented managers most effective in IV, V, VI,Task-oriented managers most effective in I, II, III or VIII.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
36/43
Prescriptions of the Model The major proposition in contingency theory is
the leader-match concept-leadership
effectiveness depends on matching leaders tosituations where they can exercise more control. Fiedlers research suggests that low LPC leaders will perform better in either low favorability
situations or in very high favorability situations.High LPC leaders will perform best in moderatefavorability situations.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
37/43
Path-Goal Theory The path-goal theory of leadership effectiveness
specifies what the leader must do to achieve high
productivity and morale in a given situation.
Path-goal theory, in its most basic form, is basedupon expectancy theory. The effective leader
will ensure valued rewards are available to thefollowers (the goal) and will help them find waysof getting to these goals (the path).
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
38/43
The Path-Goal Theory The underlying mechanism of the path-goal
theory deals with expectancy , a cognitiveapproach to understanding motivation where
people calculate: Effort-to-performance probabilities Performance-to-outcome probabilities Assigned valences or values to outcome
Path-goal theory uses the same basicassumptions as expectancy theory (to bediscussed in topic 19 Motivation)
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
39/43
Leader Behaviors Leader behaviors - unlike contingency theory,
path-goal theory suggests that leaders may use varying styles with different subordinates oreven with the same subordinates in differingsituations.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
40/43
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
41/43
Leaders / Path-Goal
Directive leaders give specific directions. Supportive leaders strive to create a positive
climate. Participative leaders consult with subordinates
taking their suggestions into account.
Achievement-oriented leaders push goal setting,higher standards, and show strong confidence intheir followers.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
42/43
The Followers Path-goal theory contains follower variables of overall
satisfaction,locus of control,and perceived ability.
Followers will actively support a leader as long as they view theleaders actions as a means for increasing their own level ofsatisfaction.
Followers who believe they are capable of performing a task are notas motivated by, or willing to accept, a directive leader as they woulda leader with participative behavior.
-
8/10/2019 Topic 12.Contingency Theories & Situational Leadership.ppt
43/43
Evaluation of Theory Path-Goal Theory is so complicated and has so
many nuances it is primarily studied byresearchers and scholars in the field ofleadership it has little value or at bestquestionable value for practicing leaders.