Tomohisa Takimi (NCTU)
description
Transcript of Tomohisa Takimi (NCTU)
11
A non-perturbative analytic study of the supersymmetric lattice gauge theory
Tomohisa Takimi (NCTU)Ref) K. Ohta, T.T Prog.Theor. Phys. 117 (2007) No2
[hep-lat /0611011] (Too simple)
Ref) K. Ohta, T.T Prog.Theor. Phys. 117 (2007) No2
[arXiv:0710.0438] (more correct)
14th March 2008 at (NTU)
2
1. Introduction1. Introduction
Supersymmetric gauge theoryOne solution of hierarchy problem Dark Matter, AdS/CFT correspondence
Important issue for particle physics
2
*Dynamical SUSY breaking. *Study of AdS/CFT
Non-perturbative study is important
3
Lattice: Lattice: A non-perturbative method
lattice construction of SUSY field theory is difficultlattice construction of SUSY field theory is difficult..
Fine-tuning problem
SUSY breaking Difficult
* taking continuum limit* numerical study
4
ex). N=1 SUSY with matter fields
gaugino mass, scalar mass
fermion massscalar quartic coupling
Computation time becomes huge (proportional to power of # of the relevant parameters)
(with standard lattice action (Plaquette gauge action + Wilson or Overlap fermion))
too many!4 parameters
Hard SUSY breaking generates Many relevant SUSY breaking counter terms
Fine-tuning problem
Computation time becomes huge
5
Lattice formulations free from fine-tuning
We call as BRST charge
{ ,Q}=P_
P
Q
A lattice model of Extended SUSY
preserving a partial SUSY
: does not include the translation
6
Twist in the Extended SUSY
Redefine the Lorentz algebra
.
(E.Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 117 (1988) 353, N.Marcus, Nucl.
Phys. B431 (1994) 3-77
by a diagonal subgroup of (Lorentz) (R-symmetry)
Ex) d=2, N=2
d=4, N=4
they do not include in their algebra
Scalar supercharges under , BRST
charge
7
Extended Supersymmetric gauge theory action
Topological Field
Theory action Supersymmetric Lattice Gauge
Theory action latticeregularization
Twisting
BRST charge is extracted from spinor
charges
is preserved
equivalent
8
CKKU models (Cohen-Kaplan-Katz-Unsal)
2-d N=(4,4),3-d N=4, 4-d N=4 etc. super Yang-Mills theories
( JHEP 08 (2003) 024, JHEP 12 (2003) 031, JHEP 09 (2005) 042)
Sugino models (JHEP 01 (2004) 015, JHEP 03 (2004) 067, JHEP 01
(2005) 016 Phys.Lett. B635 (2006) 218-224 ) Geometrical approach
Catterall (JHEP 11 (2004) 006, JHEP 06 (2005) 031)
(Relationship between them:
SUSY lattice gauge models with the
T.T (JHEP 07 (2007) 010)) Damgaard, Matsuura
(JHEP 08(2007)087)
9
Do they really solve fine-tuning problem?
Perturbative investigation They have the desired continuum
limit CKKU JHEP 08 (2003) 024, JHEP 12 (2003)
031, Onogi, T.T Phys.Rev. D72 (2005) 074504
Non-perturbative investigation Sufficient investigation has not been
done !
Our main purpose
Do they have the desired target continuum limit with full supersymmetry ?
10
( Topological Study ) -
2.2. Our proposal for the Our proposal for the non-non-
perturbative studyperturbative study -
11
Extended Supersymmetric gauge theory action
Topological Field
Theory action Supersymmetric Lattice Gauge
Theory action
limit a 0continuum
latticeregularization
12
Topological fieldtheory
Must be realized
Non-perturbative
quantity
How to perform the Non-perturbative investigation
Lattice
Target continuum theory
BRST-cohomol
ogy
For 2-d N=(4,4) CKKU models
2-d N=(4,4)
CKKU
Forbidden
Imply
The target continuum theory includes a topological field theory as a subsector.
Judge
13
Why it is non-perturbaitve? (action )
BRST cohomology (BPS state)
We can obtain this value non-perturbatively in the semi-classical limit.
these are independent of gauge coupling
Because
Hilbert space of topological field theory:
14
The aim
A non-perturbative studywhether the lattice theories havethe desired continuum limit or not
through the study of topological property on the lattice
We investigate it in 2-d N=(4,4) CKKU model.
15
In the 2 dimensional N = (4,4) super Yang-Mills theory
3. Topological field theory 3. Topological field theory in the in the continuum theoriescontinuum theories -
3.1 About the continuum theory
3.2 BRST cohomology
16
Equivalent topological field theory action
3.1 About the continuum theory
: covariant derivative(adjoint
representation) : gauge field
(Dijkgraaf and Moore, Commun. Math. Phys. 185 (1997) 411)
(Set of Fields)
17
BRST transformation BRST partner sets
(I) Is BRST transformation homogeneous ?
(II) Does change the gauge transformation laws?
Let’s consider
If is set of homogeneous linear function of
is homogeneous transformation of
def
( is just the coefficient)
18
(I) What is homogeneous ?
ex) For function ex) For function
We define the homogeneous of as follows
homogeneous
not homogeneous
We treat as coefficient for discussion of homogeneous of
19
Answer for (I) and (II) BRST
transformation change the gauge transformation law
BRST
(I)BRST transformation is not homogeneous of : homogeneous
function of : not homogeneous of
(II)
20
3.2 BRST cohomology in the continuum theory
satisfies so-called
descent relation
Integration of over k-homology cycle ( on torus)
(E.Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 117 (1988) 353)
homology 1-cycle
BRST-cohomology
are BRST cohomology composed by
21
not BRST exact !
not gauge invariant
formally BRST exact
change the gauge transformation law(II)
Due to (II) can be BRST cohomology
BRST exact (gauge invariant quantity)
22
4.Topological Field theory on the lattice4.Topological Field theory on the lattice
We investigate in the 2 dimensional = (4,4) CKKU supersymmetric lattice gauge theory
( K.Ohta , T.T (2007))
4.1 BRST exact action4.2 BRST cohomology
23
N=(4,4) CKKU action as BRST exact form .
4.1 BRST exact form of the lattice action ( K.Ohta , T.T (2007))
Fermion
Boson
Set of Fields
24
BRST transformation on the on the latticelattice
(I)Homogeneous (I)Homogeneous transformation oftransformation of
BRST partner sets
are homogeneous functions of
In continuum theory,
(I)Not Homogeneous (I)Not Homogeneous transformation oftransformation of
can be written as tangent vectortangent vectorDue to homogeneous property of
If we introduce fermionic operator
They Compose the number operator as which counts the number of fields within
homogeneous property and
26
Operation of the number operator :Eigenvelu
e of
27
has a definite number of fields in
can be written as
Any term in a general function of fields
Ex)
A general function
:Polynomial of
Eigenfunction decomposition under
:Eigenvelue of
2828
since
is homogeneous transformationwhich does not change the number
of fields in
Comment of (2)
29
( II ) Gauge symmetry under and the location of fields
* BRST partners sit on same links or sites
* (II)Gauge transformation laws do not change under BRST transformation
30
BRST cohomology BRST cohomology cannot be cannot be realized!realized!
The BRST closed operators on the N=(4,4) CKKU lattice model
must be the BRST exactexcept for the polynomial of
4.2 BRST cohomology on the lattice theory
(K.Ohta, T.T (2007))
31
【1】
【 2 】 commute with gauge transformation : gauge
invariant
for
Proof
with
Consider
From
: gauge invariant
:
must be BRST must be BRST exactexact .
Only have BRST cohomology(end of proof)
32
N=(4,4) CKKU model
Target theory
Topological field theory
BRST cohomology must be composed only by
BRST cohomology are composed by
Topological fieldtheory
Imply
33
Topological field theory
continuumlimit a 0 Extended
Supersymmetric gauge theory
Supersymmetric lattice gauge theory
Topological field theory
One might think the No-go result (A) has not forbidden the realization of BRST cohomology in the continuum limit in the case (B)
(A)
(B)
Even in case (B), we cannot realize the observables in the continuum limit
34
lattice spacing )
The discussion via the path The discussion via the path (B) (B) Topological observable in the
continuum limit via path (B)Representation of on the lattice
These satisfy following property
(
35
We can expand as
And in, it can be written as
So the expectation value of this becomes
Sinc
e
Also in this case, Since the BRST transformation is
homogeneous,
since
!
We cannot realize the topological property
via path (B)
36
Topological field theory
continuumlimit a 0 Extended
Supersymmetric gauge theory
Supersymmetric lattice gauge theory
Topological field theory
(A)
(B)
The 2-d N=(4,4) CKKU lattice model cannot realize the topological property in the continuum limit!
The 2-d N=(4,4) CKKU lattice model would not have the desired continuum limit!
37
5. Summary5. Summary
• We have proposed that the topological property (like as BRST cohomology) should be used as a non-perturbative criteria to
judge whether supersymmetic lattice theories
which preserve BRST charge
have the desired continuum limit or not.
38
We apply the criteria to N= (4,4) CKKU model
There is a possibility that topological property cannot be realized.
The target continuum limit might not be realized by including non-perturbative effect.
It can be a powerful criteria.
39
40
Discussion on the No-go result
(I) Homogeneous property of BRST transformation
on the lattice. (II) BRST transformation does not change
the gauge transformation laws.
(I)and (II) plays the crucial role.
These relate with the gauge transformation law on the lattice.
Gauge parameters are defined on each sites as the independent parameters.
Vn Vn+itopology
41
The realization is difficult due to the independence of gauge parameters
BRST cohomology
Topological quantity
(Singular gauge transformation)Admissibility condition etc. would be needed
Vn Vn+i
(Intersection number)= 1
42
What is the continuum limit ? Matrix model without
space-time(Polynomial of
)0-form All
right
* IR effects and the topological quantity
* The destruction of lattice structure
soft susy breaking mass term is requiredNon-trivial IR Non-trivial IR
effecteffect
Only the consideration of UV artifact Only the consideration of UV artifact
not sufficient.not sufficient.
Dynamical lattice spacing by the deconstructionwhich can fluctuate
Lattice spacing infinity