to download the handouts.
Transcript of to download the handouts.
8/11/15
1
Operating Room Ulcers: Who is at Risk? Can They be Prevented? Joyce Black, PhD, RN, CWCN, FAAN Susan M. Scott, MSN, RN, CWOCN Debra Fawcett, PhD, RN
npuap.org
The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) serves as the authoritative voice for improved patient outcomes in pressure ulcer prevention and treatment through public policy, education and research.
©2015 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel | www.npuap.org
8/11/15
2
NPUAP – in collaboration with the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) and the Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA) – has worked to develop a NEW pressure ulcer prevention and treatment Clinical Practice Guideline and a companion Quick Reference Guide.
Purchase your copy today at www.npuap.org
©2015 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel | www.npuap.org
npuap.org
Released in November 2012, the 254-page, 24 chapter monograph, Pressure Ulcers: Prevalence, Incidence and Implications for the Future was authored by 27 experts from NPUAP and invited authorities and edited by NPUAP Alumna Dr. Barbara Pieper.
The monograph focuses on pressure ulcer rates from all clinical settings and populations; rates in special populations; a review of pressure ulcer prevention programs; and a discussion of the state of pressure ulcers in America over the last decade.
Purchase the monograph today at www.npuap.org Hard Copy $75 E-version $49 Individual Chapters $19
©2015 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel | www.npuap.org
npuap.org
8/11/15
3
npuap.org
NPUAP’s Next Live Webinar! October 1, 2015 1:00 PM ET Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in Vulnerable People Aimee Garcia, MD Steven Antokal, MSN, RN, WOCN
©2015 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel | www.npuap.org
npuap.org
8/11/15
4
25 – 29 September
www.wuwhs2016.com
8/11/15
5
Discuss how to identify OR acquired ulcers in your facility
Identify the risk factors for pressure ulcer development in OR
Describe interventions to reduce risk during surgery
9
Joyce Black: Consultant/Speaker’s Bureau for Celleration, Coloplast, Hill-Rom, Mölnlycke, Roho, Sage Products Suzy Scott: Sage Products Speaker Bureau Debra Fawcett: None No conflicts exist for any of the webinar speakers.
10
8/11/15
6
Pressure ulcers that appear within the first 72 hours after surgery in tissues that were subjected to pressure during the operation
Incidence ◦ 5-53.4%
Prevalence ◦ 9-21%
Ganos, Siddiqui, 2012
©2015 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel | www.npuap.org 11!
©2015 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel | www.npuap.org 12!
8/11/15
7
Determining what is “an OR acquired ulcer” ◦ Seldom visible at
end of case Cautery, device and
prep solution burns visible early
How many of your PrU start in OR?
This burn occurred in the OR; visible at end of case
Prep solution burn
Pressure ulcer in loaded body area during case ◦ Need to know position for
surgery ◦ Supine = buttocks in
normal weighted patients, heels and occiput ◦ Lithotomy = lower pelvis ◦ Prone = face, shoulders,
ribs, knees This patient had a 12 hour Whipple done 2 days prior to the onset of purple buttocks tissue
8/11/15
8
Susan M. Scott, MSN, RN, CWOCN University of Tennessee College of Medicine
Office of Graduate Medical Education Memphis, Tennessee
Facebook #scotttriggers Twitter @scotttriggers
8/11/15
9
Surgery is one of the
few times when someone
not normally at high-risk
for pressure ulcer
development is
placed at risk (Gendron 1988)
30 min
+ 20 min
2 hrs
A 2 Hour Surgery is really much longer = Time sedated + surgical procedure + recovery period
2 hrs
Created by Kathy Carlson
8/11/15
10
• 1999 Aronovitch study (1,128 pt.) • Rate 4%-45%
• 2012 Chen review of 17 studies (5,451 pt.) • Rate 0.3% to 57% • Pooled incidence of 15%
“Incidence over past 5 years has NOT decreased, but increased” (Chen 2012)
11
Consider trauma cases, bariactric, and re-operations
Cardiac
Orthopedic
General/Thoracic
Urology
Vascular
• 29.5%
• 20%-55%
• 13%-29.3%
• 14.4%-17%
• 9.8%-16%
8/11/15
11
Total number of procedures: 51.4 million 19.2 million 65 years and older
• Cardiac catheterizations: 1.0 million • Balloon angioplasty or artherectomy: 500,000 • Insertion of coronary artery stent: 454,000 • Coronary artery bypass graft: 395,000
Cardiac
• Reduction of fracture: 671,000 • Total knee replacement: 719,000 • Total hip replacement: 332,000
Orthopedic
NCHS 2010 National Hospital Discharge Survey http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhds/4procedures/2010p+ro4_numberprocedureage.pdf
+
• Location of Ulcers
• Heels 14% - 52% • Sacral 22% - 41%
• Buttocks 11%-47% • Elbow 5% • Occiput 4% (Pediatric)
22
8/11/15
12
Pre-operative (Intrinsic)
Intra-operative (Extrinsic)
Post-operative
Age* >62 • Age & co-morbidity • Low Albumin level* • Body mass index <19 or >40 • Recent significant weight loss • Race • ASA Scores* • Diabetes* • Cardiac disease* • Vascular disease* • Pulmonary disease* • Renal Insufficiency • Time to surgery *Statistically Significant Factors
in Multiple Studies
8/11/15
13
Category I ◦ Normal Healthy
Category II ◦ Mild systemic disease without functional limitations
Category III ◦ One or more moderate to severe diseases. I.e. poorly
controlled DM or HTN, COPD, morbid obesity (BMI ≥40). Category IV ◦ Severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life.
I.e. (<3 mo.) MI, CVA, TIA, or CAD/stents. Category V ◦ Moribund not expected to survive without the operation
Category VI ◦ A declared brain-dead patient whose organs are being
removed for donor purposes.
American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status Classification. Retrieved August 4th, 2015 at http://www.asahq.org/resources/clinical-information/asa-physical-status-classification-system
Time on the table* • Type of Surgery* • Surgical position & devices • Negativity – layers • Warming blanket • Hypotensive episodes • Heat - Hypothermia • Decreased H&H* • Cardiopulmonary Circulation • Table pad construction* • Shear/Friction • Lateral transfers • Anesthesia (General/spinal) • Medications • Moisture - Maceration
8/11/15
14
Post-operative • Days in the bed* • Total time of immobility • Success of Recovery
• Early mobilization • Hemodynamic status • Respiratory (Hypoxia)
• Nutrition* • Skin assessment • Pressure redistribution • Pain Control • Device related ulcers
• Cervical Collars • Tubing
NPUAP, EPUAP, PPPIA 2014 Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Practice Guidelines Individuals in the Operating Room
1. Consider additional risk factors specific to individuals undergoing surgery (C)
2. Use a high specification mattress on the OR table for at risk individuals (B)
3. Position patient to reduce risk of PrU development during surgery (C) 4. Ensure that the heels are free of the surface of the operating table (C) 5. Position the knees in slight flexion when offloading the heels (C) 6. Pay attention to pressure redistribution prior to and after surgery (C) Strength of Evidence (A,B,C) Strength of Recommendations (Definitely do it)
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Practice Guideline. Emily Haesler (Ed.). Cambridge Media: Osborne Park, Western Australia; 2014.
8/11/15
15
1. Consider additional risk factors specific to individuals undergoing surgery including:
Duration of time immobilized before surgery Length of surgery Increased hypotensive episodes during surgery Low core temperature Reduced mobility on day on post-op.
NOTE: • Braden Scale has limitations in the surgical
population • Braden Q Scale – Pediatric populations • Munro Scale is undergoing validation studies • Scott Triggers is a concurrent systematic
trigger tool National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Practice Guideline. Emily Haesler (Ed.). Cambridge Media: Osborne Park, Western Australia; 2014.
The Munro Scale has under gone 3 rounds of a Delphi Study and is currently in implementation studies in seven sites.
This Study is funded by Cardinal Health E3 Foundation Grants and AORN.
Undergoing validity and reliability The Munro Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment
Scale for Perioperative Patients ~ Adults developed by Cassendra A. Munro MSN, RN CNOR
8/11/15
16
In General Trigger Systems • Target adverse events that are both prevalent and preventable • Should fill a need and add value • Trigger notifications should be actionable • Should have a good “signal-to-noise” ratio and cost-benefit ratio.
• Cost of implementation vs. cost of harm to patient • Good sensitivity and positive predictive value
• Trigger systems should be easy to implement
Concurrent Trigger System* • Identify real-time problems during the clinical episode in which the
problem occurs • Allow productive intervention at the patient level • Prevent or mitigate adverse event • *Does not have inherent criteria for clinical specificity
31
32
8/11/15
17
Real Time Concurrent Trigger System (AHRQ)
• Age >62 • Albumin
<3.5 • ASA Score ≥3 • Time on the
table ≥3 hr
Scott Triggers
OR Skin Bundle • Use high specification OR
table pads • Offload heels • Use special padding for high
risk body areas • Use only approved
positioning devices • Safe patient handling • Handoff communication • Post op:
• Early movement • Daily skin assessment • Pressure management
Score 2 or more = HIGH RISK
Black J, Fawcett D. Scott S Ten top tips: Preventing pressure ulcers in the surgical patient. Wounds International 2014:5(4). http://www.woundsinternational.com/pdf/content_11478.pdf. Accessed February 10, 2015.
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, and Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, TX
21,377 surgical patients screened with Scott Triggers ◦ (Age >62, Albumin <3.5, ASA ≥ 3, Surgery >3 hrs)
7,000 high risk (≥2 triggers) High risk protocol HAPU dropped from 3.37% to 0.89% (P=.004) and
sustained over 18 months.
34
. Martinez S, Braxton C, Helmick R, Awad S, Lara-Smalling, A, Baylor College of Medicine. Sustainability of a hospital acquired pressure ulcer prevention bundle in surgical patients. Paper presented at Surgical Infection Society 34th Annual Meeting 2014 Baltimore, MD May 1-3, 2-14.
8/11/15
18
Risk Assessment Scale specific to surgical population
Incidence and prevalence perioperative pressure ulcers
RCT of surfaces and positioning devices
Role of hypothermia, anesthesia and medications in microcirculation.
35
Universal Pressure Precautions
OR Skin Bundles
Lean the OR
Structured standardized handoff communication
Teamwork
investigations including Root Cause Analysis (RCA)
8/11/15
19
Debra L. Fawcett PhD, RN
Assessment Skin/Risk Pharmacology Factors Intrinsic/extrinsic Positioning
8/11/15
20
Knowledge/Education Technology Appropriate staffing Positioning Communication
Knowledge and the application of knowledge is the key to the prevention of pressure ulcer in the OR. Educate up front, part of orientation, annual
education Do a journal club with a focus on PU’s in the OR Report on PU during morning reports Toilet talk Posters Stories of PU acquired in the OR (powerful)
8/11/15
21
Know the AORN Standards and Guidelines Have an assigned champion that follows all
patients with extended surgeries or increased risk factors
Attend conferences with NPUAP, WOCN, webinars
Isn’t it great In 1994 when I started Pressure mapping systems Research on devices Low air loss Dynamic surfaces Gel –vs- foam Viscoelastic Overlays
8/11/15
22
Powered or non powered Look at your patient population, choose
surfaces that are compatible with your care setting
Alternating pressure (not recommended for the OR)
Advance planning (time to get supplies adds to time on OR bed)
Correct functioning of all devices to be used should be checked in advance
Know the pressure points Type of anesthesia
8/11/15
23
During positioning it is imperative the team have a solid understanding of the position to be used
How long will the patient will be in that positon
How will it affect the airways (decreased oxygen)
What devices will be used Are the heels off loaded Are pressure points protected
Supine Lateral Prone Lithotomy
8/11/15
24
What devices are used, have in room Make sure working correctly Do not use IV bags to position Linens do not redistribute pressure Bariatric devices – make sure they are
correctly attached Do devices help control the microclimate
(wick) Know the expectations of the surgical team
Check for correct placement after the patient is positioned
Anesthesia- general/ spinal Use pressure redistributing surfaces on all
carts/gurney before the procedure starts
8/11/15
25
Must have the correct amount of staff in each operating room during positioning to protect the patient from injury.
Many patients go sleep on a gurney and then are moved to the operating room bed.
Need the correct number of people to place all devices and to prevent damage to the skin and boney prominences
Communication should begin when the patient is scheduled for surgery.
Preoperatively, the risk assessment should be completed and then relayed to the intraoperative team, include items such as albumin if available, weight, mobility, past PU, co-morbidities
All of the items that Susie spoke of in her risk section
8/11/15
26
Preoperative team should communicate risk to the intraop team and intraop should report to PACU and PACU to unit.
Preop
Intraop
PACU
Unit
Include time on OR bed, any special devices used, what the skin looked like at the end of the procedure, type of anesthesia, any reddened areas, decreased O2 levels, by-pass machines, how long in PACU
Communication should also return to the OR team if the patient develops a PU so the OR team can investigate as well.
8/11/15
27
Communication of PU development should also be reported to all staff /all units for their understanding and review.
©2015 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel | www.npuap.org 54!
8/11/15
28
AORN (2015). Guidelines for Perioperative Practice. Denver, CO. 563-580.
Baron, S. and Mc Farlane, G. (2009). Reducing pressure ulcer risk in the operating room.
Black J, Fawcett D. Scott S Ten top tips: Preventing pressure ulcers in the surgical patient. Wounds International 2014:5(4). http://www.woundsinternational.com/pdf/content_11478.pdf. Accessed February 10, 2015.
Fawcett, D. (2011). Prevention of positioning injuries. Perioperative Safety. St. Louis, Missouri. 167-178.
Giachetta-Ryan, D. (2015). Perioperative pressure ulcers: How can they be prevented? OR Nurse, July, 22-28.
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) (2014). Prevention and Treatment of pressure ulcers: Clinical Practice Guidelines. 73-75.
Primiano, M. Friend, M., McClure, C., Scott, N., Fix, L., Schafer, M., Savochka, K., and McNett, M. (2011). Pressure ulcer prevalence and risk factors during prolonged surgical procedures. AORN Journal (94)6, 555-566.
Reddy, M., Gill, S., & Rochon, P. (2006). Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, (296)8, 978-974-982
Walton-Greer, P. (2009). Prevention of pressure ulcers in the surgical patient. AORN Journal, (89)3. 538-548.
8/11/15
29
1. Scott SM, Mayhew PA, Harris EA. Pressure ulcer development in the operating room. Nursing implications. AORN J. 1992; 56 (2):242-250.
2. Aronovitch SA. Intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcer prevalence: a national study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 1999;26:130-136.
3. Beckrich K, Aronovitch SA. Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a comparison of costs in medical vs. surgical patients. Nurs Econ. 1999;17:263-271.
4. Cowan LJ, Stechmiller JK, Rowe M, Kairalla JA. Enhancing Braden pressure ulcer risk assessment in acutely ill adult veterans. Wound Rep Regen. 2012;20:137-148
5. Nixon J, McElvenny D, Mason S, Brown J, Bond S. A sequential randomized controlled trial comparing a dry viscoelastic polymer pad and standard operating table mattress in the prevention of post-operative pressure sores. In J Nurs Stud. 1999; 35:193-203
6. Aronovitch S, Wilber M, Slezak S. Martin T. Utter D. A comparative study of an alternating air mattress for the prevention of pressure ulcers in surgical patients. Ostomy Wound Management. 1999;45(3):34-44.
7. Russell J, Lichtenstein S. Randomized controlled trial to determine the safety and efficacy of a multi-cell pulsating dynamic mattress system in the prevention of pressure ulcers in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Ostomy Wound Management. 2000;46(2):46-5.
8. Schoonhoven L., Defloor T, Grypdonck MH. Incidence of pressure ulcers due to surgery. J Clin Nurs. 2002;11(4):479-487
9. Feuchtinger J, Bie RD, Dassen T, Halfens R. A 4 cm thermoactive viscoelastic foam pad on the operating room table to prevent pressure ulcer during cardiac surgery. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15(2):162-7.
10. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Practice Guidelines. Emily Haesler (Ed.). Cambridge Media: Perth, Australia; 2014.
11. Chen H, Chen X, Wu J. The incidence of Pressure Ulcers in Surgical Patients of the Last 5 years. Wounds. 2012;24(9):234-241.
57
11. Lumbley, J, Ali S, Tchokouani L. Retrospective review of predisposing factors for intraoperative pressure ulcer development. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2014; 26:368-374. 12. Bergstrom N, Braden B, Kemp M, Champagne M, Ruby E. Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale. Nurs Res. 1998;47:261-269. 13.Tschannen D, Bates O, Talsma A, Guo Y. Patient-specific and surgical characteristics in the development of pressure ulcers. Am J Crit Care. 2012;21(2):116-124. 14. He W, Liu P, Chen H. The Braden Scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: A meta-analysis. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2012;58(2):34-40
15. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Triggers and Targeted Injury Detection Systems (TIDS) Expert Panel Meeting: Conference Summary. Rockville, MD. AHRQ Pub. No. 090003. Feb. 2009 16. Martinez S, Braxton C, Helmick R, Awad S, Lara-Smalling, A, Baylor College of Medicine. Sustainability of a hospital acquired pressure ulcer prevention bundle in surgical patients. Paper presented at Surgical Infection Society 34th Annual Meeting 2014 Baltimore, MD May 1-3, 2-14. 17. Dunlap L, Baker D. Correlation of Scott Triggers and Perioperative Homeostasis Indicators (PHI): Arthroplasty (total hip and total knee) and Spinal Fusion Surgery. Poster presented at the 2012 Tennessee Hospital Association Annual meeting. 18. Esch D. Scott Triggers: A Screening Tool for Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Surgical Patients. J PeriAnesthesia Nurs. 2010; 25(3):186 19. Fawcett D, Scott S, Thompson L. CSI (Common Surgical Injury) Investigation. Poster presented at AORN 56th Annual Conference March 14-19, 2009.
58
8/11/15
30
21. Lindgren M, Unosson, M, Krantz, AM, Ek, A. Pressure ulcer risk factors in patients undergoing surgery. J of Adv Nurs. 2005;50(6):605-612.
22. American Academy of Nurses. Raise the Voice 2014. http://www.aannet.org/edge-runners--perioperative-pressure-ulcer-prevention-program
23. Pham B, Teague L, Mahoney J, Goodman L, Paulden M, Poss, J. “et al.” Support surfaces for intraoperative prevention of pressure ulcers in patients undergoing surgery: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Surgery. 2011;150(1):122-32.
24. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Always Events. 1 January 2013 http://www.ihi.org/engage/Initiatives/PatientFamilyCenteredCare/Pages/AlwaysEvents.aspx. Accessed December 7, 2014.
25. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Triggers and Targeted Injury Detection Systems (TIDS) Expert Panel Meeting: Conference Summary. Rockville, MD. AHRQ Pub. No. 090003. Feb. 2009
26. Stiefel M, Nolan K. A Guide to Measuring the Triple Aim: Population Health, Experience of Care, and Per Capita Cost. IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2012. (Available on www.IHI.org) Accessed December 7, 2014.
27. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Value Based Purchasing. 21 October 2014. (Available on www.CMS.gov) Accessed December 7, 2014.
28. Guidelines for Perioperative Practice. Denver, CO: AORN, Inc; 2015. In press 29. Black J, Fawcett D. Scott S Ten top tips: Preventing pressure ulcers in the
surgical patient. Wounds International 2014:5(4). http://www.woundsinternational.com/pdf/content_11478.pdf. Accessed February 10, 2015.
To earn the 1.0 continuing education credit from today’s webinar please visit the link below.
This information will also be emailed out to participants at the conclusion of the webinar.
https://blueq.co1.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9T5LsV2pLZGqgzH
npuap.org