To check or not to check – that is the question?
description
Transcript of To check or not to check – that is the question?
![Page 1: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
To check or not to check – that is the question?
Liz Fidler – Health Education Kent, Surrey & SussexEllen Williams – South West Medicines Information & Training
South West Medicines Information and Training
![Page 2: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Learning outcomes
Discuss the roles and responsibilities of checking
Debating who can/should check Debating the differences in checking in a
Dispensary V a technical services unit Exploring the potential of transferability
between the two roles for rotational staff Discuss the development of Pharmacy
Technician Product Approval in Technical Services
![Page 3: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Who can be a checker?
![Page 4: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Responsible or Accountable – you decide???
In groups look at your scenario and discuss who you think is Responsible Accountable
![Page 5: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Responsible
Professionalism- regulatory/professional body membership?
Accountable
Legal – held to account
Civil? Regulator?
![Page 6: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Debate – Technical ‘V’ Dispensary Checking
![Page 7: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Common ground
Need? Transferability Career progression NHS Scoping exercise results
What does that look like? One qualification – theory
Checking procedure Error reporting Communication skills – error feedback (learning) Law?
Does this feel right? What do you think it should include?
![Page 8: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Next step for pharmacy technicians in technical services….
Product Approval
![Page 9: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The South West Product Approval Pilot Project
South West Medicines Information & Training
![Page 10: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Project Aim
To develop and deliver a functional and high-quality training programme for individuals who carry out the task of “product approval” for aseptic products.
To develop and work within an operating framework that ensured that pharmacist supervision was in place.
To address the training requirements of pharmacists and registered pharmacy technicians.
South West Medicines Information & Training
![Page 11: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Background
Pre and In process checking (since 2005)◦ 66 pharmacy technicians/ATOs are currently on the SWMIT register
Feedback◦ Improved standards ◦ Improved confidence
Current Situation◦ Lack of training for rotational band 6/7 authorised pharmacists◦ Lack of confidence and understanding of responsibility when releasing a product ◦ The need to train in restricted time frames
There is a requirement to release products during the first three month rotation◦ Clinical issues are being picked up at the end of the process (at the point of product
approval)
South West Medicines Information & Training
![Page 12: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What has been the barrier to pharmacy technicians product approving and releasing in technical services historically?
![Page 13: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
A proposed Product Approval/Pharmacist Supervision model
South West Medicines Information & Training
![Page 14: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Methodology Phase I
South West Medicines Information & Training
![Page 15: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Phase IIUp to 100 products per site prepared under section 10 exemption were recorded
Details of the clinical screening, prescription verification, preparation and product approval processes were documented
Details of the product, pathway for product approval, trained pharmacy technician approver or authorised pharmacist, and the recommendations for approval and associated outcomes.
All products approved by trained pharmacy technician product approvers MUST have been second checked.
Methodology
South West Medicines Information & Training
![Page 16: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Results & Outcomes
Phase I
17 learners recruited in 2 cohorts
13 successfully met all of the assessment criteria to demonstrate their skills, knowledge and competencies.
Indicates the power of the assessment process to discriminate between learners. Provides an appropriate degree of assurance that individuals can perform the task of product approval at a safe level and operate as “Accredited Product Approvers”.
South West Medicines Information & Training
![Page 17: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Phase IIData on over 500 individual preparations
96% of products were clinically checked and verified prior to preparation.
93% were suitable for release by an Accredited Product Approver clinically checked and verified by an appropriate
pharmacist(s) prior to preparation the product itself was suitable.
3 discrepancies out of 193 products approved On review, these cases involved minor technical issues and
in no case would have impacted on patient safety. 2 omitted additional “room temperature storage” labels 1 incorrect worksheet (wrong dose band)
South West Medicines Information & Training
![Page 18: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The new SW accreditation programme includes the following components:
The unit would need…….
Approval by Regional QA to incorporate Accredited Product Approvers. Trust board, Senior Pharmacy manager and Accountable Pharmacist authorisation for change in process.Regional QA approval of candidates selected.Participation in national error reporting scheme.
Implementation (1)
South West Medicines Information & Training
![Page 19: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Implementation (2)
Trainees will require….
•Completion of pre-course tasks and learning.•Two day training course.•Six week period of experience, supervised checking and collection of evidence (at least 50 items). Missed errors would require restart of this process.•Summative practical and viva voce examination. Failure would require re-sit or restart.•Accreditation and commencement of probationary period.•Reaccreditation
South West Medicines Information & Training
First formal induction course ran 8th/9th May 2013
![Page 20: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Next steps…
“The work of the NHS Aseptic Services Accreditation Working Group will now focus on working with members of the SW Product Approval Accreditation Programme to develop a national framework to support the wider roll out of this initiative.
This work stream will commence mid 2013.
It must be noted that the definition of supervision cannot be considered in isolation and must be fully supported by a framework that gives the same levels of resource, governance and oversight that has been incorporated into the South West Programme”
Richard Bateman, May 2013Quality Assurance Specialist PharmacistEast and South East England Specialist Pharmacy ServicesChair – NHS Aseptic Services Accreditation Working Group
![Page 21: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
For more information about the SW Product Approval Accreditation Programme:
SWMIT Website:www.swmit.nhs.uk
Or contact Ellen [email protected]
Acknowledgements
Thanks to members of the SW Product Approval Pilot Project regional steering group and the NHS Aseptic Services Accreditations Working Group for their support with the Product Approval project.
South West Medicines Information & Training
![Page 22: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Summarise
Views will be shared with NHS PEDC task and finish groups
![Page 23: To check or not to check – that is the question?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062803/568146b5550346895db3d4e8/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Any questions?