TMA1 -MBA5922
Transcript of TMA1 -MBA5922
![Page 1: TMA1 -MBA5922](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022021119/577d25821a28ab4e1e9efaa6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
8/4/2019 TMA1 -MBA5922
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tma1-mba5922 1/7
MATILDA NYALUNGU
STUDENT NUMBER: 72714948
STRATEGY FORMULATION: MBA 592-2
ASSIGNMENT 1
DUE DATE: 26 SEPTEMBER 2011
TUTOR: ELVIS RABOHALE
![Page 2: TMA1 -MBA5922](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022021119/577d25821a28ab4e1e9efaa6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
8/4/2019 TMA1 -MBA5922
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tma1-mba5922 2/7
QUESTION 1
Resources possessed by Walmart that would give it an advantage over local
retailers
The proponents of resource-based view (RBV) argue that the resources and
capabilities of an organization are the main source of its competitive advantage
(Bakhru and Gleadle, 2010). Barney (1986) cited by Parnell and Lester (2008) argue
that the resource-based view considers performance to be a function of a firm's
ability to utilize its resources. Although environmental opportunities and threats are
important, a firm's unique resources compose the key variables that allow it to
develop a distinctive competence (Lado, Boyd, and Wright, 1992) and enable it to
distinguish itself from rivals and create competitive advantage.
A firm's resources include all of its tangible and intangible assets, such as capital,
building, equipment, employees, technology, organisation’s reputation, brand,
knowledge, organisational culture and information. An organization's resources are
directly linked to its capabilities, which can create value and ultimately lead to
profitability for the firm (Parnell and Lester, 2008). Barney (1991) cited by Bakhru
and Gleadle (2010:14) argued that a resource must be valuable if it is to contribute to
competitive advantage. These valuable resources must be rare, imperfectly imitable
and non-substitutable. These resources and capabilities would enable the
organisation implementing a strategy to generate sustainable competitive advantage.
1.1 Background of Walmart
The announcement of Walmart (the world largest retailer) for placing a $4.25 billion
offer to buy up the shares of South African retailer Massmart Holdings Ltd. (Wal-
Mart/Massmart merger) as a way of entering South Africa's market, was faced with
opposition from unions. Due to Walmart's global notorious disrespect for worker
rights, the firm's specific business model and practices, unions belief the world’s
largest retailer’s entry into South African retail sector will impact not only on
![Page 3: TMA1 -MBA5922](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022021119/577d25821a28ab4e1e9efaa6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
8/4/2019 TMA1 -MBA5922
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tma1-mba5922 3/7
Massmart's competitors in the retail space, which include SMMEs and informal
traders, but also reverberate up the supply chain. .
Massmart, headquartered in Johannesburg, is one of the largest distributors of consumer
goods on the African continent and is the leading African retailer of general merchandise,
home improvement equipment and supplies. Massmart is also the market-leading retailer of
basic foods in the region. The company runs 290 stores in 13 countries in Africa, with the
vast majority of its stores in South Africa, and manages eight wholesale and retail chains
operating under a variety of different brand names.
Walmart is well-known for its strong positive culture
Sam Walton initiated Wal-Mart’s values of dedication to customer service, treating
employees as partners, zealous pursuit of low costs, frugality, etc. These beliefs were set
decades ago, and subsequent managers have continued to develop them into patterns of
shared values and behaviours that benefit the organisation.
![Page 4: TMA1 -MBA5922](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022021119/577d25821a28ab4e1e9efaa6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
8/4/2019 TMA1 -MBA5922
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tma1-mba5922 4/7
Conclusion
The Wal-Mart footprint has created numerous challenges for competitors, particularly
small retailers whose managers are not well prepared when the big boxer opens a
store nearby.
![Page 5: TMA1 -MBA5922](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022021119/577d25821a28ab4e1e9efaa6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
8/4/2019 TMA1 -MBA5922
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tma1-mba5922 5/7
QUESTION 2
The popular image is that Wal-Mart comes to town and locally-owned retailers shrivel up
and die. This may happen, but it doesn't have to. Retailers who carefully analyze their own
strengths and weaknesses vis a vis Wal-Mart's may survive and prosper. Retail owners should
consider three strategies: a focus on low costs, a focus on differentiation, and a value
orientation. Sometimes these can be mixed-and-matched among a retailer's product lines.
"There's no substitute for knowing one's customers, markets, and resources as a foundation
for ... a successful strategy," according to the authors
![Page 6: TMA1 -MBA5922](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022021119/577d25821a28ab4e1e9efaa6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
8/4/2019 TMA1 -MBA5922
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tma1-mba5922 6/7
Conclusion
Regardless of the option chosen, a successful strategy can only be developed when
a retailer has the appropriate knowledge and tools required to make the best choice
and tailor it specifically to the firm's unique array of strategic resources (Parnell and
Lester, 2008).
References
Bakhru and Gleadle, 2010. Competing with capabilities. Unit 3, Milton Keynes: Open
University
Lado, A., Boyd, N., and Wright, P. (1992). A competency-based model of sustainablecompetitive advantage: Toward a conceptual integration. Journal ofManagement, 18(1), 77-91.
Parnell, J.A and Lester, D.L. 2008. Competitive strategy and the Wal-Mart threat:positioning for survival and success [Online]. SAM Advanced ManagementJournal. Available from<http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:I9HS5EaAjjsJ:www.allbusiness.com/company-activities-management/company-strategy/11416513-
![Page 7: TMA1 -MBA5922](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022021119/577d25821a28ab4e1e9efaa6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
8/4/2019 TMA1 -MBA5922
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tma1-mba5922 7/7
1.html+Tactics+by+South+African+local+retailers+to+defend+against+walmart+resources+and+capabilities&cd=10&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=za>[Accessed on 19 September 2011]
Implementing Strategy Through Organizational Structure, Control, and CultureA. The first component of strategy implementation is organizational structure, which assigns
employees to specific tasks and specifies how those tasks link together to realize a competitive
advantage. The purpose of organizational structure is to coordinate and integrate the efforts of all
employees at the corporate, business, and functional levels, and across functions and business units,
so that they work together to help the firm achieve its strategies successfully.
B. Another component of implementation is a strategic control system, which provides the incentives
that motivate employees to help the firm achieve its strategies. Control systems also provide
performance feedback to managers so that corrective action can be taken if needed.
C. Organizational culture is another important component of strategy implementation, and it consists
of the values, norms, beliefs, and attitudes that are shared by people in an organization. Culture
guides the way that employees interact with each other and with stakeholders outside theorganization, and thus will have an important impact on the implementation of an organization’s
strategies.