Slide 1-1 Copyright © 2000 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. ECONOMIA GENERAL.
TM 3-1 Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Introduction to Economics Division of Labor....
-
Upload
dennis-heath -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of TM 3-1 Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Introduction to Economics Division of Labor....
TM 3-1Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Introduction to Economics
Division of Labor. Production Possibilities and Opportunity
cost.
TM 3-2Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Learning Objectives
• Explain the division of labour
• Explain the fundamental economic problem
• Define the production possibility frontier
• Define and calculate opportunity cost
• Explain the conditions in which resources are used efficiently.
TM 3-3Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Learning Objectives (cont.)
• Explain how economic growth expands production possibilities
• Explain how specialization and trade expand production possibilities
TM 3-4Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Division of Labor: Definition
• is the specialization of cooperative labour in specific, circumscribed tasks and roles. Historically an increasingly complex division of labour is closely associated with the growth of total output and trade, the rise of capitalism, and of the complexity of industrialization processes.
• The specialization supposes cooperation!
TM 3-5Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Division of labour :
Natural division of labour:
Men vs. Women ; Mountains vs. Valley Regions;
Social division of labour: from Primitive society to modern economy – hunting, plant-growing, stock-breeding, craftsmanship, manufacturing, trading, industrial production.
TM 3-6Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Division of labour :National Economy-
A. Division by sectors: agriculture, industry and services
B. Division by branches: shipbuilding, car manufacturing, electronics, chemical industry, construction industry, textile industry, food industry, transportation, communications, banking, entertainment, legal services, education, health care, etc.
C. Inter-company division – horizontal (within the same industry) or vertical – among companies from different industries.
D. Intra-company division of labour – for instance, BMW – different departments and divisions of the company produce different goods and services: components, aggregates, mechanisms, tuning, painting, assembling, quality control, etc.
E. Intra-departmental division of labour (for instance, professor from the same department have specialized in teaching of different courses.
TM 3-7Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Division of labour :Global division of labour
In one recent study, Deon Filmer estimated that 2,474 million people participated in the global non-domestic labour force. Of these, around 15%, or 379 million people, worked in industry, a third, or 800 million worked in services, and
over 40%, or 1,074 million, in agriculture.
International division of labour : by country, by regions and organizations (EU, NAFTA, etc.) – oil exporting countries, food exporting countries, high-tech products exporting countries, etc.
TM 3-8Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Division of labour:
• Sir William Petty was the first modern writer to take note of division of labour, showing its existence and usefulness in Dutch shipyards. Classically the workers in a shipyard would build ships as units, finishing one before starting another. But the Dutch had it organised with several teams each doing the same tasks for successive ships.
TM 3-9Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Division of labour :
• Adam Smith : In the first sentence of An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776), Adam Smith foresaw the essence of industrialism by determining that division of labour represents a qualitative increase in productivity. His example was the making of pins.
TM 3-10Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Division of labour :
• Karl Marx
• Increasing the specialisation may also lead to workers with poorer overall skills and a lack of enthusiasm for their work. This viewpoint was extended and refined by Karl Marx. He described the process as alienation; workers become more and more specialised and work repetitious which eventually leads to complete alienation. Marx wrote that "with this division of labour", the worker is "depressed spiritually and physically to the condition of a machine". He believed that the fullness of production is essential to human liberation and accepted the idea of a strict division of labour only as a temporary necessary evil.
TM 3-11Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Division of labour:
K. Marx : wrote that "with this division of labour", the worker is "depressed spiritually and physically to the condition of a machine". He believed that the fullness of production is essential to human liberation and accepted the idea of a strict division of labour only as a temporary necessary evil.
TM 3-12Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Division of labour :
Marx's most important theoretical contribution is his sharp distinction between the social division and the technical or economic division of labour. That is, some forms of labour co-operation are due purely to technical necessity, but others are purely a result of a social control function related to a class and status hierarchy.
TM 3-13Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Limited Resources
The resources that are used to produce goods and services are:
• Labor
• Land
• Capital
• Entrepreneurship
TM 3-14Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Limited Resources
Labor
The time and effort that we devote to producing goods and services.
Land
The gifts of nature that we use to produce goods and services.
TM 3-15Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Limited Resources
Capital
The goods we use to produce other goods and services.
• Includes physical capital
• interstate highways, buildings, and dams
• and human capital
• the knowledge and skill that people obtain from education and on-the-job training
TM 3-16Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Limited Resources
Entrepreneurship
The resource that organizes labor, land, and capital.
TM 3-17Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Unlimited Wants
Our wants are insatiable.
Humans, by nature, would like to have more of those things they find desirable.
TM 3-18Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Resources and Wants
We have limited resources.
We have unlimited wants.
This leads to scarcity.
Scarcity exists when there are insufficient resources to satisfy people’s wants.
TM 3-19Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Economics
Economics is the study of the choices people make to cope with scarcity.
TM 3-20Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Learning Objectives
• Explain the fundamental economic problem
• Define the production possibility frontier
• Define and calculate opportunity cost
• Explain the conditions in which resources are used efficiently.
TM 3-21Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Resources, Production Possibilities, and Opportunity Cost
The production possibilities frontier is used to illustrate the maximum quantity of two goods that can be produced due to scarcity.
TM 3-22Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Tapes Soda(millions (millions of bottles
Possibility per month) per month)
Production Possibilities Frontier
a 0 and 15
b 1 and 14
c 2 and 12
d 3 and 9
e 4 and 5
f 5 and 0
TM 3-23Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Attainable
Production Possibility FrontierS
oda
(mill
ions
of
bottl
es p
er m
onth
)
Unattainable
Tapes (millions per month)0 1 2 3 4 5
5
10
15
z
ab
d
c
f
e
TM 3-24Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Opportunity Costs
Opportunity Cost
All tradeoffs involve a cost -- an opportunity cost.
TM 3-25Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Opportunity Costs
• The opportunity cost of an action is the highest valued alternative foregone.
• Opportunity costs increase as we desire to produce more CDs.
• This explains the shape of the PPF -- it is bowed outward.
TM 3-26Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Opportunity Costs
Opportunity Cost Is a Ratio
The decrease in the quantity produced of one good divided by the increase in the quantity of another good.
Increasing Opportunity Cost
Opportunity costs tend to increase because not all resources are equally productive in all activities.
TM 3-27Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Using Resources Efficiently
Marginal cost
The opportunity cost of producing one more unit of a good or service.
The marginal cost of an additional tape is the quantity of soda that must be given up to get one more tape — the opportunity cost.
TM 3-28Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Opportunity Cost and Marginal Cost
CDs (millions per month)0 1 2 3 4 5
10
15a
b
c
d
e
f
0 1 2 3 4 5
5
Sod
a (m
illio
ns o
f bo
ttles
per
mon
th)
Increasing opportunity cost of CDs...
TM 3-29Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Opportunity Cost and Marginal Cost
CDs (millions per month)0 1 2
Sod
a (m
illio
ns o
f bo
ttles
per
mon
th)
1
2
3
4
5…means increasingmarginal cost of CDs.
MC
TM 3-30Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Marginal Benefit
Marginal benefit
The benefit that a person receives from consuming one more unit of a good or service.
It is measured as the maximum amount that a person is willing to pay for one more unit.
Decreasing Marginal Benefit
The more we have of any one good or service, the smaller is our marginal benefit.
TM 3-31Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Marginal Benefit
a 0.5 5
b 1.5 4
c 2.5 3
d 3.5 2
e 4.5 1
CDs Willingness to Pay Possibility (millions per month) (bottles per CD)
TM 3-32Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Marginal Benefit
CDs (millions per month)0 1 2 3 4 5
Sod
a (m
illio
ns o
f bo
ttles
per
mon
th)
1
2
3
4
5
MB
Decreasingmarginalbenefit from CDs.
TM 3-33Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Learning Objectives
• Explain the fundamental economic problem
• Define the production possibility frontier
• Define and calculate opportunity cost
• Explain the conditions in which resources are used efficiently.
TM 3-34Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Efficient Use of Resources
Efficiency
• Implies that we cannot produce any more of any good without giving up something that we value even more highly.
• We compare the marginal cost to the marginal benefit.
TM 3-35Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Efficient Use of Resources
• If the marginal benefit of the last unit of a good exceeds its marginal cost, we increase production of that good.
• If the marginal cost of the last unit of a good exceeds its marginal benefit, we decrease production of that good.
TM 3-36Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
MC
Efficient Use of ResourcesM
argi
nal c
ost a
nd w
illin
gnes
s to
pay
(
bottl
es o
f so
da p
er C
D)
CDs (millions per month)0 1.5 2.5 3.5 5
1
2
3
4
5
MB
Bottles of sodathat people are willing to forgo
Bottles of sodathat peoplemust forgo
Cost exceedsbenefit
Benefitexceedscost
TM 3-37Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Economic Growth
Economic growth is illustrated by an economy’s expansion in production over time.
TM 3-38Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Economic Growth
The Cost of Economic Growth
• The development of new goods and better ways of producing goods and services is technological change.
• The growth of capital resources is capital accumulation.
Does economic growth allow us to avoid opportunity costs?
TM 3-39Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
PPF1
Economic GrowthC
D -
mak
ing
mac
hine
s (p
er m
onth
) c
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2
4
6
10
8
b
a
PPF0
If we produce 6 machines a month (b), then the PPF rotates. We will be able to produce more CDs in the future.
b'
a'
CDs (millions per month)
TM 3-40Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Gains from Trade
Comparative Advantage
A person or nation has a comparative advantage in an activity if they/it can perform an activity at a lower opportunity cost than others.
Why is there a difference?• Differences in abilities
• Differences in resource characteristics
TM 3-41Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Comparative Advantage
Tom’s Factory
• Can produce 4,000 CDs/hour or
• Can produce 1,333 cases/hour
Opportunity Cost
• To produce 1 case, he must decrease CD production by 3 CDs — opportunity cost.
• To produce 1 CD, he must decrease case production by 0.333 case — opportunity cost.
TM 3-42Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Comparative AdvantageNancy’s Factory
• Can produce 1,333 CD/hour or
• Can produce 4,000 cases/hour
Opportunity Cost
• To produce 1 case, she must decrease CD production by 0.333 — opportunity cost.
• To produce 1 CD, she must decrease case production by 3 cases — opportunity cost.
TM 3-43Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Comparative Advantage
1 2 3 4
1
2
3
5
4
Cas
es (
thou
sand
s pe
r ho
ur)
Nancy’sPPF
1Tom’sPPF
4
b
b'
a
Nancy’s opportunity cost:1 CD costs 3 cases, and 1 case costs 1/3 CD
Tom’s opportunity cost:1 CD costs 1/3 case, and 1 case costs 3 CDs
Trade line
c
CD (thousands of lengths per hour)
TM 3-44Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Absolute Advantage
• An absolute advantage exists when a person or nation can produce more of a good than another.
• Individuals and nations can have absolute advantages in any or all goods.
• However, it is not possible to have a comparative advantage in everything.
TM 3-45Copyright © 1998 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Dynamic Comparative Advantage
• People or nations can become more productive simply by repetition --learning-by-doing.
• Dynamic Comparative Advantage results from learning-by-doing.
• Examples: China, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Mexico, Poland, Czech Republic