Title of Presentation (36) Name of Presenter (24) Date of ... · WACC Infl X Infl X Infl X Infl X...
Transcript of Title of Presentation (36) Name of Presenter (24) Date of ... · WACC Infl X Infl X Infl X Infl X...
1
PBR Performance Based Regulation
PBR Implementation
Republic Act No. 9136
Electric Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA) • Signed: 8 June 2001 • Effectivity: 26 June 2001
Implementing Rules & Regulations
• Signed: 27 February 2002
2 PBR Implementation
EPIRA Section 2: Declaration of Policy of the State a) xxx b) To ensure the quality, reliability, security and affordability of the supply of
electric power; c) To ensure transparent and reasonable prices of electricity in a regime of
free and fair competition and full public accountability to achieve greater operational and economic efficiency and enhance the competitiveness of Philippine products in the global market;
d) xxx e) xxx f) To protect the public interest as it is affected by the rates and service of
electric utilities and other providers of electric power. g) xxx h) Xxx i) Xxx j) To establish a strong and purely independent regulatory body and system
to ensure consumer protection and enhance the competitive operation of the electricity market; and
k) xxx
PBR Implementation 3
ERC Mandate
Sec. 38 of EPIRA
“There is hereby created an independent, quasi-judicial regulatory
body to be named the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC).”
4 PBR Implementation
ERC Major Functions
Promote competition Encourage market development
Ensure customer choice
Set the transmission, distribution and
retail rates of the captive market
Impose fines and penalties for any non-compliance
5 PBR Implementation
FUEL IN THE FORM OF COAL OR OIL IS PURCHASED FROM ABROAD AND PAID FOR IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
$$$
ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS THEN GENERATE ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY IS THEN CARRIED OVER LONG DISTANCES BY TRANSMISSION CABLES THAT IS TAPPED INTO BY LOCAL DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES
YOUR LOCAL DISTRI- BUTION UTILITY SETS UP THE POWER LINES IN YOUR COMMUNITY AND SERVICES YOUR NEEDS FOR ELECTRICITY
GENERATION CHARGE
(65%)
TRANSMISSION CHARGE
(10%)
DISTRIBUTION, SUPPLY. & METERING CHARGES
(25%)
HOW ELECTRICITY IS DELIVERED TO YOUR HOME?
HOW IS THIS REFLECTED IN YOUR ELECTRIC BILL?
Where does the peso in your electric bill go?
PBR Implementation 6
Unbundled Electric Bill
7 PBR Implementation
How does ERC set the Charges?
Generation WESM: Market NPC: Return on Rate Base Methodology IPPs: Individual review of bilateral contracts or PSA
Transmission Previously, Return on Rate Base Methodology Currently, Performance-Based Regulation
Distribution Private Distribution Utilities
Previously, Return on Rate Base Methodology Currently Performance-Based Regulation
Electric Cooperatives Previously Cash Flow Methodology Currently Benchmarking Methodology
PBR Implementation 8
How does the Return on Rate Base Methodology set your rate?
Determine Annual Revenue Requirement Based on a historical test year
OPERATING EXPENSES
PAYROLL
RETURN OF INVESTMENT
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
OTHER REVENUE
ITEMS
necessary, legitimate, prudent, continuing, normal includes operating and maintenance expense and taxes
updated salaries plus allowable benefits
12 % of rate base value of used and useful assets + working capital
depreciation
9
Revenues arising from asset - based operations should be shared by DU
PBR Implementation
Advantages Long standing practice Fairly constant, substantial returns despite fluctuations in the economy or
firm composure Provides earnings stability by guarding against excessive or unduly meager
earnings As practiced, allows reflection of current prices through adjustment
mechanisms Timing of regulatory reviews when utility “under-earns”
Disadvantages Limited incentive for exceptional performance Encourages cost-padding Averch-Johnson effect on capital costs:
If allowed return > capital costs = incentive to over-invest If allowed return < capital costs = incentive to under-invest
Consumers, rather than the regulated firm, bears much of the market risk Possible price shocks to consumer *Averch, Harvey; Johnson, Leland L. (1962). "Behavior of the Firm Under Regulatory Constraint".
How does the Return on Rate Base Methodology set your rate?
PBR Implementation 10
11
Adoption of PBR • As authorized under Section
43(f) of the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA), the ERC, promulgated the Performance Based Regulation (PBR): – In May 2003, thru the
Transmission Wheeling Rates Guidelines (TWRG), later amended as Rules for Setting Transmission Wheeling Rates (RTWR) in September 2009
– In December 2004, thru the Distribution Wheeling Rates Guidelines (renamed as Rules for Setting Distribution Wheeling Rates, RDWR).
PBR Implementation
Performance Based Regulation
• PBR is intended to ensure that firms have incentives to improve efficiency
• Regulator must ensure that all these gains do not accrue to the firms
• Wide recognition that a trade-off exists between – The service quality at which electricity is supplied
and – The cost for providing this service
• Hence, the Regulator also has the legal and societal obligation to regulate service quality PBR Implementation 12
Performance Based Regulation
• EFFICIENCY thru review of the Annual Revenue Requirement
• SERVICE QUALITY thru setting of the Performance standards
PBR Implementation 13
PBR - Annual Revenue Requirement
Determine forecasted Annual Revenue Requirement (referred as Building Blocks) for a Regulatory Period
OPERATING EXPENSES
TAXES
RETURN OF INVESTMENT
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
INCOME TAX
operating and maintenance expenditures
property taxes, business taxes
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) X rate base value of optimized used & useful assets + working capital depreciation
set to zero
14 PBR Implementation
• The investor expects a return on its investment; • The return is a mixed of Debt (thru loan) or Equity (investor-infused
capital); • Usually the interest rate in Debt is higher than the Equity • Based on an optimal value of the Regulatory Asset Base plus allowed
Working Capital
15
RETURN ON INVESTMENT = ( WACC ) X Regulatory
asset base
+ Working capital
PBR – Building Blocks
PBR Implementation
• ERC to determine the value of the rolled-forward optimized depreciated regulatory asset base (RAB)
• RAB going forward will be based on initial opening value and the approved efficient CAPEX.
• ERC will review CAPEX requirements of utilities, based on: – information provided by the utilities on historical CAPEX – CAPEX forecasts provided by utilities – Justification of CAPEX – Analysis by independent expert(s) on the information provided
by utilities and the levels of efficiency implied – Other information at the ERC’s disposal
16
RETURN ON INVESTMENT = ( WACC ) X Regulatory
asset base
+ Working capital
How are Capital Projects considered?
PBR Implementation
Review of Capital Expenditure
17 PBR Implementation
PBR - Building Blocks
• The analysis of each building block is done for each year of the regulatory period
18 PBR Implementation
Annual Revenue Requirement
OPERATING EXPENSES
TAXES
RETURN OF INVESTMENT
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
INCOME TAX
Regulatory Year 1
OPERATING EXPENSES
TAXES
RETURN OF INVESTMENT
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
INCOME TAX
OPERATING EXPENSES
TAXES
RETURN OF INVESTMENT
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
INCOME TAX
OPERATING EXPENSES
TAXES
RETURN OF INVESTMENT
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
INCOME TAX
Regulatory Year 2 Regulatory Year 3 Regulatory Year 4
REGULATORY PERIOD
19 PBR Implementation
Annual Revenue Requirement
PBR Implementation 20
Smoothing the ARR for the RP
PBR Implementation 21
++
−+−+2
201120112010
)1()1)(1(
WACCFQXInflXInfl
×− )( 02009 PMAP
++
−+)1(
)1( 20102010
WACCFQXInfl
++
−+−+−+3
2012201220112010
)1()1)(1)(1(
WACCFQXInflXInflXInfl
420132013201220112010
)1()1)(1)(1)(1(
WACCFQXInflXInflXInflXInfl
+−+−+−+−+
=
Smoothing the ARR for the RP
22
Calculate the present value of the allowed ARR resulting from the MAP that a regulated entity is permitted to charge.
Present Value of the ARR
ARR applied with (CPI-X)
4 2013
3 2012
2 2011 2010
) 1 ( ) 1 ( ) 1 ( ) 1 ( WACC ARR
WACC ARR
WACC ARR
WACC ARR
+ +
+ +
+ +
+
PBR Implementation
How are the target performance levels set for the regulatory period? The utilities’ historical performance of the outcomes of the various performance indicators is reviewed An assessment is done on the performance indicators that need to be addressed in the regulatory period Relative weighting on each performance indicator is determined based on the foregoing The average performance or target performance level is set Average of the previous regulatory period Best of the regulatory Period (see Distribution Code: historical) Performance steps for reward and penalty are set
Service Quality Measures under PBR
PBR Implementation 23
Service Quality Measures under PBR
• Price-linked incentive scheme – depending on network and service performance, a
reward is added to the annual price-cap or a penalty is deducted
• Guaranteed Service Levels – component of the PIS in which the DUs will
compensate a consumer directly if certain service delivery performance standards are not met
PBR Implementation 24
What are the control mechanisms?
1. A review every 4 years (Reset) – Determine Annual Revenue Requirement
thru the Building Block analysis – to determine/benchmark the actual cost that
has been incurred by the Utility; – to determine/adjust the service performance
measures
25 PBR Implementation
What are the control mechanisms?
2. Annual Verification – to ensure that Utility earns only within the
approved constraints; – to adjust for the actual increase/decrease in
price of commodities (inflation); – to adjust for the actual increase/decrease in
sales; – to review the service performance (incentive
or penalty)
26 PBR Implementation
Annual Verification and Adjustment
This year’s price per unit of electricity
Previous year’s price per unit of electricity
Index of change in Consumer Prices
Efficiency factor
Correction for revenue over or under-recovery in previous year
Correction for tax over or under-recovery in previous year
Performance Incentive Factor
27 PBR Implementation
Next year’s price is capped at this year’s price plus an allowance for general cost increases, reduced by an efficiency factor.
YEAR 1
Regulatory Period
Regulatory Year
Regulatory Reset Process
YEAR -1
YEAR 2
YEAR 3
YEAR 4
PBR Process
28 PBR Implementation
Reset Process
Public Hearings
Utility Submits Revenue Application
Position Paper
Public Consultation
Issues Paper
Draft Determination
Public Consultation
Final Determination
Utility Submits Rate Application
Public Hearings
Rate Implementation
Rate Decision FOR EACH YEAR
OF THE REGULATORY PERIOD
ERC Responsibilities
DUE PROCESS
UTILITY Responsibilities
LEGEND
PBR Implementation 29
Timelines of Private DUs Entrant Regulatory Period
Manila Electric Company (MERALCO) July 01, 2011- June 30, 2015 Dagupan Electric Company (DECORP)
Cagayan Electric and Light Company (CEPALCO) Cotabato Light and Power Company (CLPC) April 01, 2009 - March
30, 2013 Iligan Light and Power Company (ILPI) Mactan Electric Company (MECO) Cabanatuan Electric Corporation (CELCOR)
July 01, 2010 - June 30, 2014
La Union Electric Company (LUECO) Tarlac Electric, Inc. (TEI) Visayan Electric Company (VECO) Ibaan Electric and Engineering Company (IEEC) Davao Light and Power Company (DLPC) Panay Electric Company (PECO)
October 01, 2011- September 30, 2015
Subic Enerzone (SEZ) San Fernando Light and Power Company (SFELAPCO) Bohol Light Company, Inc. (BLCI) Angeles Electric Corporation (AEC) Clark Electric Distribution Corporation (CEDC)
PBR Implementation 30
Issues Raised
– Building Blocks approach – WACC – Determination of RAB (valuation) – Correction Factor (k-factor) – Side Constraints – Working Capital – Bad Debts – Over/Under Recoveries from previous RP – Setting of Po and X – factor – Annual Verification – Regulatory Intervention – Regulatory Reset Experts
31 PBR Implementation
Next… Building Blocks Valuation WACC
32 PBR Implementation