Time to Think Differently: The case for change

38
The case for change Time to Think Differently www.kingsfund.org.uk/think

description

Our Time to Think Differently programme has made the case for change and highlighted the trends that will influence the way health and social care is delivered in future. To help you explore and share this work, we are creating a series of downloadable slidepacks. We hope that they will inform your thinking and discussions about the future of care. The first pack in this series explores the pressures on the health and social care delivery system and why it needs to change to meet the challenges of the future.

Transcript of Time to Think Differently: The case for change

Page 1: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

The case for change

Time to Think Differentlywww.kingsfund.org.uk/think

Page 2: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

Major progress has been made in improving the performance of the NHS in the past decade.

Page 3: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

Waiting times for treatment in hospital have fallen dramatically and generally remain stable.

Page 4: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

Hospital-acquired infection rates like MRSA have fallen dramatically.

Page 5: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

The NHS continues to be highly valued by the public.

Source: Ipsos Mori 2013

Page 6: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

The NHS continues to perform well on most indicators when compared to other countries.

Page 7: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

However, the current health and social care delivery system has failed to keep pace with the needs of an ageing population, the changing burden of disease, and rising patient and public expectations.

Page 8: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

Fundamental change is needed. It is time to think differently.

Page 9: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

The case for change is compelling:

1. Variations in quality and outcomes of care

2. Funding pressures3. Delivery system not fit for the future4. Future trends – magnifying the

pressures

Page 10: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

1. Variations in quality and outcomes of care

Page 11: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

‘The UK has the second highest rate of mortality amenable to health care in 16 high-income nations.’

Source: Nolte and McKee 2011

Page 12: Time to Think Differently: The case for change
Page 13: Time to Think Differently: The case for change
Page 14: Time to Think Differently: The case for change
Page 15: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

For many diseases, there is unwarranted variation.

Page 16: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

There are wide variations in performance and gaps in the quality of care of general practice.

Page 17: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

2. Funding pressures

Page 18: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

Current spending projections suggest significant financial pressures on services for the next 20 years.

Page 19: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

Historic pressures to increase NHS spending.

Source: Appleby 2012

Page 20: Time to Think Differently: The case for change
Page 21: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

Increasing pressure to achieve productivity gains.

By 2015£20

billionNicholson challenge for productivity gains

By 2021£30 billion

moreNHS England estimates of a funding gap

Page 22: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

Projected spending on long-term care 2016/17–2061/2

Source: OBR 2012

Page 23: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

3. Delivery system not fit for the future

Page 24: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

A significant proportion of patients occupying beds do not need to be in hospital on clinical grounds.

Source: Goddard et al 2000; Audit Commission 2003

Page 25: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

The separation between general practitioners and hospital-based specialists, and between health and social care, often inhibit the provision of timely and high-quality, integrated care to people who need to access a range of services relevant to their needs.

Source: Ham et al 2012

Page 26: Time to Think Differently: The case for change
Page 27: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

There are significant problems with standards of dignity and care.

Page 28: Time to Think Differently: The case for change
Page 29: Time to Think Differently: The case for change
Page 30: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

Obesity is associated with an increased risk of diseases including diabetes, heart disease, osteoarthritis and cancer. 

Source: National Obesity Observatory 2012

Page 31: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

4. Future trends: magnifying the pressures

Page 32: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

Demographics are changing.

Page 33: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

More people with long-term conditions.

Page 34: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

A rise in chronic disease.

Page 35: Time to Think Differently: The case for change
Page 36: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

Population lifestyles present significant risks to health.

Page 37: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

What is the future model of care?

Integrated care, co-ordinated around the needs of patients and service users.Patients and service users actively involved in the design of their care and working with professionals as part of the care team.Re-designing the care pathway, with greater specialisation in hospitals, increased capacity and more consistent standards in primary care.Stronger focus on prevention.

Page 38: Time to Think Differently: The case for change

If you would like to know more:

Visit www.kingsfund.org.uk/think for guest blogs, videos and supporting data on trends.

Follow us @thekingsfund or join the debate #kfthink

Like us on Facebook

Follow us on LinkedIn