Tijuana River Watershed Group Project. Mitigation of Impaired Stormwater Quality in Los Laureles...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Tijuana River Watershed Group Project. Mitigation of Impaired Stormwater Quality in Los Laureles...
Mitigation of Mitigation of Impaired Impaired
Stormwater Quality Stormwater Quality in Los Laureles in Los Laureles
Canyon, Tijuana, Canyon, Tijuana, MexicoMexicoApril 2, 2008April 2, 2008
K. Heyn, R. Keane-Dengel, W. Lewis, J. Phillips, N. Virgilio
Transborder PollutionTransborder Pollution
Source: Wildcoast.net
Human health Human health effects; effects;
Environmental Environmental degradation;degradation;
Social, political & Social, political & economic impactseconomic impacts
Source: phfactor.net
Plume (Pacific Ocean)
Tijuana River Estuary
Los Laureles Canyon
Tijuana River
Imperial Beach
Tijuana
Pollutants of ConcernPollutants of Concern
Source: N. Virgilio, May 2007
PathogePathogensns
SedimSedimentent
Refuse/Refuse/DebrisDebris
Research QuestionsResearch Questions
What is the magnitude of the What is the magnitude of the transbordertransborder
pollution problem in Los Laureles pollution problem in Los Laureles Canyon?Canyon?
How can stakeholders reduce the How can stakeholders reduce the transport oftransport of
pathogens, sediments, and refuse pathogens, sediments, and refuse through thethrough the
canyon? canyon?
Client and StakeholdersClient and Stakeholders
InternationalInternational
Boundary WaterBoundary Water
Commission (IBWC)Commission (IBWC)StateStateCalifornia California SWRCBSWRCBSDRWQCBSDRWQCBLocalLocalCounty of San County of San DiegoDiegoCity of Imperial City of Imperial BeachBeach
FederalFederalU.S. EPA U.S. EPA NOAANOAA
FederalFederalNational Water National Water Commission Commission (CNA)(CNA)StateStateState Public State Public Services of Services of Tijuana (CESPT)Tijuana (CESPT)
Tijuana Water Tijuana Water AuthorityAuthorityLocalLocalCity of City of TijuanaTijuana
ApproachApproach
Pathogens
Sediment
Refuse/Debris
Literature reviewStakeholdermeetings
Site visits
Watershed
model
Sewage managem
ent
Treatment:*Septic*Sewering
BMPs: *Structural *Community-based
Stormwater
management
Survey
Research
Recommendat ions
Sewage ManagementSewage ManagementSelecting a Modeling ApproachSelecting a Modeling Approach
Limited Los Laureles Canyon water quality Limited Los Laureles Canyon water quality datadataExtensive geospatial resources (SDSU)Extensive geospatial resources (SDSU)Meteorological and hydrologic dataMeteorological and hydrologic data
Goal for modeling:Goal for modeling: Establish magnitude of pathogen problemEstablish magnitude of pathogen problemUnderstand the implications of different Understand the implications of different sewage management scenarios in Los Laureles sewage management scenarios in Los Laureles CanyonCanyon
Sewage ManagementSewage ManagementWatershed Model (WARMF)Watershed Model (WARMF)
WARMF simulates:WARMF simulates: Physical processes Physical processes
affecting streamflowaffecting streamflow Loading of pollutants Loading of pollutants
from landusesfrom landuses Routes waters and Routes waters and
contaminants contaminants through watershedthrough watershed
Simulates different Simulates different sewage sewage management management scenariosscenarios
Source: WARMF, W. Lewis 2008
Los Laureles HydrologyLos Laureles HydrologyLower Los Laureles Canyon Discharge
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Dis
char
ge
(cm
s)
Sewage ManagementSewage ManagementWARMF ResultsWARMF Results
Lower Sub-basin Fecal Coliform
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
10/1/2000
10/1/2001
10/1/2002
10/1/2003
10/1/2004
10/1/2005
10/1/2006
10/1/2007
Fec
al C
oli
form
(M
PN
/100
mL
)
Baseline
BasinObjective
Sewering Sewering San San BernardoBernardo
Septic Septic systems in systems in Los Laureles Los Laureles CanyonCanyon
Sewering in Sewering in Los Laureles Los Laureles CanyonCanyon
Sewage ManagementSewage ManagementModeling ScenariosModeling Scenarios
Sewage ManagementSewage ManagementWARMF ResultsWARMF Results
Lower Sub-basin Fecal Coliform
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
Baseline
BasinObjective
Fec
al C
olifo
rm (M
PN
/100
mL)
Sewage ManagementSewage ManagementWARMF ResultsWARMF Results
Lower Sub-basin Fecal Coliform
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000 Baseline
SBSewer
BasinObjectiveF
ecal
Colifo
rm (M
PN
/100
mL)
Sewage ManagementSewage ManagementWARMF ResultsWARMF Results
Lower Sub-basin Fecal Coliform
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000 Baseline
SBSewer
LLSeptic
BasinObjectiveF
ecal
Colifo
rm (M
PN
/100
mL)
Sewage ManagementSewage ManagementWARMF ResultsWARMF Results
Lower Sub-basin Fecal Coliform
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000Baseline
SBSewer
LLSeptic
LLSewer
BasinObjective
Fec
al C
olifo
rm (M
PN
/100
mL)
Sewage Management Sewage Management Modeling DiscussionModeling Discussion
Sewering San Bernardo Sewering San Bernardo Slight reduction in fecal coliform Slight reduction in fecal coliform
concentrationsconcentrations Contributions from other basins not Contributions from other basins not
addressedaddressed
Need for basin-scale actionsNeed for basin-scale actions Septic system effectiveness limitationsSeptic system effectiveness limitations
Slope and soils not conduciveSlope and soils not conducive Require subsidy from governmentRequire subsidy from government
Sanitary sewering may be viableSanitary sewering may be viable
Stormwater ManagementStormwater ManagementChallengesChallenges Unstable soils, high Unstable soils, high
erosionerosion High volume of refuseHigh volume of refuse Flashy hydrologyFlashy hydrology Minimal infrastructureMinimal infrastructure
Selection CriteriaSelection Criteria Low maintenanceLow maintenance Self-containedSelf-contained Tamper resistantTamper resistant Low costLow cost Potential for multi-usePotential for multi-use
Stabilization Options: Tire retaining wallsStabilization Options: Tire retaining wallsStormwater ManagementStormwater Management
Source: Civil Engineering Department, Clemson University, 1999
Source: Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality, 2005Source: R. Keane-Dengel, May 2007
Stabilization Options: TerracingStabilization Options: TerracingStormwater ManagementStormwater Management
Source: Woodlot Alternatives, Inc, 2007
Source: Urbonas, 2003
Source: John McCullah, 1994
Riprap Schematic
Channel Stabilization OptionsChannel Stabilization OptionsStormwater ManagementStormwater Management
BMPs: Detention and infiltration basinsBMPs: Detention and infiltration basinsStormwater ManagementStormwater Management
Source: North Carolina State University, 2005
Source: Bill Southard, DES Architects and Engineers
Capability to removeCapability to remove SedimentsSediments BacteriaBacteria NutrientsNutrients TrashTrash MetalsMetals
Cultural Cultural AdaptationAdaptation
Discourage Discourage settlementsettlement Multi-useMulti-use
Stormwater ManagementStormwater ManagementBMPs: Vegetated swalesBMPs: Vegetated swales
Intended to treat Intended to treat dry weather flow dry weather flow and small storm and small storm eventsevents
Source: King County Surface Water Design Manuel, 2005
Source: City of Sandy, 2008
Stormwater ManagementStormwater Management
Erosion ControlChannel Stabilization Detention and Infiltration BasinsVegetated Swales
Community-Based Community-Based ActionsActions
Community Community ActionsActions
Replicate permeable Replicate permeable pavement programpavement program
Rainwater collection Rainwater collection workshopworkshop
Residential erosion Residential erosion controlcontrol
Tire retaining wall Tire retaining wall workshopworkshop Source: J. Phillips, 2007
Key RecommendationsKey RecommendationsCoupled strategies to address sewage and Coupled strategies to address sewage and
stormwaterstormwater Encourage community-based actionsEncourage community-based actions Implement multiple stormwater Implement multiple stormwater
technologies technologies Provide sanitary sewer serviceProvide sanitary sewer service
Watershed management approach vitalWatershed management approach vital ““End of pipe” measures often ineffectiveEnd of pipe” measures often ineffective Los Laureles Canyon should be part of Los Laureles Canyon should be part of
larger landscape approachlarger landscape approach Advocate transborder cooperation and Advocate transborder cooperation and
collaborationcollaboration
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
Dr. Robert WilkinsonDr. Robert Wilkinson, Project Advisor, Project Advisor
Dr. Arturo A. KellerDr. Arturo A. Keller, Project Advisor , Project Advisor
Oscar RomoOscar Romo, NOAA Coastal Training Program , NOAA Coastal Training Program CoordinatorCoordinator
Bart ChristensenBart Christensen, SWRCB Border Division, SWRCB Border Division
Mayda WinterMayda Winter, City of Imperial Beach, City of Imperial Beach
Laura PetersLaura Peters, SWRCB Clean Beaches Program, SWRCB Clean Beaches Program
Douglas LidenDouglas Liden, U.S. EPA Region 9 Border Division, U.S. EPA Region 9 Border Division
Harry JohnsonHarry Johnson and SDSU TRW Program and SDSU TRW Program
Source: N. Virgilio, 2007
Stormwater ManagementStormwater ManagementInfiltration Basin Estimated CostsInfiltration Basin Estimated Costs
Stormwater Volume (m3) Infiltration Basin Costs ($)
6900 72,000
Lower Los Laureles 1 2400 35,000
Lower Los Laureles 2 51000 290,000
Middle Los Laureles 1 36000 230,000
Middle Los Laureles 2 7900 80,000
Middle Los Laureles 3 14000 120,000
Upper Los Laureles 1 18000 140,000
Upper Los Laureles 2 18000 140,000
Upper Los Laureles 3 2800 39,000
Sub-basin
Estuary
Stormwater ManagementStormwater ManagementDry Detention Basin Estimated Dry Detention Basin Estimated
CostsCosts
Stormwater Volume (ft3) Detention Basin Costs ($)
243671 150,000
Lower Los Laureles 1 84755 69,000
Lower Los Laureles 2 1801048 700,000
Middle Los Laureles 1 1271328 540,000
Middle Los Laureles 2 278986 170,000
Middle Los Laureles 3 494405 260,000
Upper Los Laureles 1 635664 320,000
Upper Los Laureles 2 635664 320,000
Upper Los Laureles 3 98881 78,000
Estuary
Sub-basin
Stormwater ManagementStormwater ManagementVegetated Swales Estimated CostsVegetated Swales Estimated Costs
Sub-basin Capital Cost ($)Annual Maintenance
Cost ($)
Estuary 26,460 662 860
Lower Los Laureles 1 91,800 2,295 2,984
Lower Los Laureles 2 194,400 4,860 6,318
Middle Los Laureles 1 140,400 3,510 4,563
Middle Los Laureles 2 30,780 770 1,000
Middle Los Laureles 3 53,460 1,337 1,737
Upper Los Laureles 1 70,200 1,755 2,282
Upper Los Laureles 2 68,040 1,701 2,211
Upper Los Laureles 3 10,800 270 351