Tier 2 and Tier 3 Behavior Interventions PLC September 29, 2014 Matt Phillips Brian Lloyd.
-
Upload
jack-spencer -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Tier 2 and Tier 3 Behavior Interventions PLC September 29, 2014 Matt Phillips Brian Lloyd.
Tier 2 and Tier 3 Behavior
Interventions PLC
September 29, 2014Matt PhillipsBrian Lloyd
Matt PhillipsCoordinator, Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBIS) Implementation – Ingham ISD
Speech-Language Pathologist• Heartwood• Sparrow• Indiana• Private Practice• MSU - CSD
Brian LloydSchool Psychologist / MTSS Implementer – Ingham ISD
Hello Everyone! My name is Brian Lloyd, and I began working for Ingham ISD in February of 2013 as a School Psychologist/MTSS Implementer. Prior to working for Ingham ISD, I was a school psychologist and MTSS Coach for East Lansing Public Schools since the start of the 2008 school year.
Learning Targets• Identify the continuum of supports for behavior across
an MTSS model
• Identify the behavioral process data and outcome data, and understand the application of data-driven decisions
• Identify tools and evidence-based strategies for multi-tiered support of behavior, with a focus on a continuum of interventions.
• Understand how Functional Behavioral Assessments and Behavior Intervention Programs fit into an MTSS system.
Continuum of Positive Behavior Supports
Outcome Data - Behavior
Classroom Management Plan vs.
Individual Intervention“Rule of Three”: If more than three students are demonstrating the same misbehavior, the management plan needs to be adjusted to address the misbehavior.
Classroom Structures
Teacher-Student
Relationships
Instructional Management
Responding to
Appropriate Behavior
Responding to
Inappropriate Behavior
Critical Features of Effective Classroom Management
(Reinke, Herman, & Sprick, 2011)
The CHAMPs Acronym
• C Conversation• H Help• A Activity• M Movement• P Participation• S Supplies
Strengthen Classroom Management
CHAMPS Coaching
Strengthen Classroom Management
Time on Task
• Opportunities to Respondo Verbal ResponsesoWritten Responseso Action Responses
All Students Respond. When possible use response procedures that engage
all students. (Archer, 2011)
Strengthen Classroom
Management
• Ratio of Interactionso Positive Interaction: acknowledging a positive
behavioro Negative Interaction: addressing a negative
behavior; fluent correction
4:115:1
Strengthen Classroom
Management
Strengthen Classroom
Management
Level of Classroom Structure
• Introduction of classroom structure survey. (Management & Discipline Planning Questionnaire)
• The level of structure should not be based on teacher preference or familiarity!
• The level of structure should be based on student need!
• When in doubt, start with a higher level of structure.
Student Needs
Teacher Needs
“Survey says…”
0-30 LOW: Students can be successful with LOW, MEDIUM, or HIGH
31-60 MEDIUM: Students need MEDIUM or HIGH
structure
61-120 HIGH: Students need HIGH structure
High Effect Sizes Of PBIS
• High Expectations: 1.44• MTSS/RtI: 1.07• Formative Evaluation of Teacher: 0.90• Teacher Clarity: 0.75• Feedback: 0.75• Teacher-Student Relationships: 0.72• Classroom Behavioral Strategies: 0.68
Tier 2 Interventions• The problem-solving process we use for behavior should
be similar to the problem-solving we use for academics.
• If a child doesn’t know how to read…….we teach.
• If a child doesn’t know how to swim…...we teach.
• If a child doesn’t know how to multiply…..we teach.
• If a child doesn’t know how to behave…
• we punish?
• John Herner; Counterpoint, Vol 19 (2) NASDSE
Problem-Solving Process
Tier 2 Interventions
• The first step in the tier 2 MTSS problem solving process is to identify the problem.o Operationally define the behavior
• The next step is to determine what is causing the problem.o Make best determination based on info at hand about antecedents and
function of behavior (what is the student getting out of behavior).
• The next step is to implement a plan to remediate difficulty.o Basic plan that involves evidence based strategies as well as a plan to
monitor progress.
• You then evaluate your plan.o Set a date to review progress and determine next steps. Review
fidelity. Continue or change intervention.
Tier 2 Interventions• The problem solving process we just discussed
requires you to EFFICIENTLY go through an ABC or basic level FBA process.
• Comprehensive Functional Behavior Assessments (FBAs) are often associated with Tier III interventions
• However…more basic and practical FBAs are important to consider in order to determine an appropriate match between a presenting behavior problem and an appropriate Tier II Intervention
• School resources (time, staff) are often limited and are certainly valuable
• Many attempts to address problem behaviors:o Consume most of our resourceso React to the problem after it occurso Fade out because they are not working…
• Problem of “premature implementation”
• But this may be attributed to a lack of fit (or match) between the problem behavior and the intervention
Why Practical FBAs?
Work smarter, not harder!
Matching Tier 2 Behavior Need To
Intervention• Consider using a 5 minute process that tells
what’s been done, operationally defines the behavior, antecedents, consequences, and function.
ABC’s of behaviorAntecedent Behavior Consequence
Teacher instructs student to begin assignment
Student begins assignment
Teacher provides verbal praise
Student put on diet by parents
Student takes food from classmates during lunch
Student eats the food
Teacher instructs students to read silently
One student cracks a joke to classmates
Classmates laugh
Student comes to school with a headache
Student engages in disruptive behavior
Student is sent to the office
Student wants to join a game at recess
Student bumps into classmates and grabs ball
Classmates get mad and tell teacher; student kept in from recess
Teacher instructs students to complete math worksheet
Student gets out of seat and argues with teacher when directed to do work
Student sent into the hallwayExamples based on Steege & Watson (2009). Conducting School-Based Functional
Behavioral Assessments
ABC’s of behaviorAntecedent Behavior Consequence Possible
function?
Teacher instructs students to begin assignment
Student begins assignment
Teacher provides verbal praise
Student put on diet by parents
Student takes food from classmates during lunch
Student eats the food
Teacher instructs students to read silently
One student cracks a joke to classmates
Classmates laugh
Student comes to school with a headache
Student engages in disruptive behavior
Student is sent to the office
Student wants to join a game at recess
Student bumps into classmates
Students get mad and tell teacher; student kept in from recess
Teacher instructs students to complete math worksheet
Student gets out of seat and argues with teacher when directed to do work
Student sent to office
Tier 2 Interventions
Selecting An Intervention
You can have the best intervention in the world, but if it is not matched to the student’s need (or cannot be implemented), the intervention is worthless.
Selecting An Intervention
• Interventions: Evidence-Based Behavioral Strategies for Individual Students – Randy Sprick (2008)
• http://www.pbisworld.com/
Antecedents or +Consequences
Intervention
Students with chronic, minor escape or disruptive behaviors; seekers of adult attention
A CICO:Check-In, Check-Out
Behavior may be due to a lack of information or awareness; minor but potentially annoying behavior; moderate behavior in early stages
B Planned Discussion
Students engaged in frequent, long term minor or moderate behaviors; may not be aware of behavior; monitoring would reduce frequency.
C Data Collection & Debriefing
Students who have experienced repeated failure; may have low expectancy rate or self-esteem
D Goal Setting
Compulsive, impulsive, habitual, or off-task behavior; unaware or poor self-monitoring
E Cueing or Pre-Correcting
Pragmatic/social deficits are a potential trigger to behavior.
F Functional Communication
Low self-awareness of behavior but with a potential and motivation to take responsibility and control; older students
G Self-Monitoring & Self-Evaluation
Intervention A
CICO: Check-In, Check-Out
Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools:The Behavior Education Program, Second Edition
A comprehensive book by Deanne A. Crone, Robert H. Horner, and Leanne S. Hawken.
Guilford Publishing, Inc., published in 2010 www.guilford.com
Who is CICO appropriate for?
• Students with minor behavior disruptionso Disruptive, interferes with learningo Out of seat, talking out, not sharing, off task, unprepared for class,
defiant, refuse to do work, inappropriate languageo Not dangerous, violent, or severe/chronic behavior
• Students who respond well to adult attention
• Behaviors occur throughout the day, not just in one setting (i.e., recess)
• Behavior not primarily related to an escape function due to academic deficit (modification may be needed)
CICO (BEP) as a Tier II Intervention
• Easy to implement for teachers (5-10 minutes per check-in)
• Flexible (if needed)• Can support approximately 20-30 students at
a time• Check-in/out person can be anyone (BEP
Coordinator, paraprofessional, etc)• Regular feedback and progress monitoring• Students can easily transfer in or out• Parent participation• Frequent data entry and review
Crone, Hawken, & Horner, 2010
Components of CICO
MiBlSi, 2009; Crone, Hawken, & Horner, 2010
Components of CICO
Components of CICO Cycle:
1. Check-in with adult in the morning (positive contact, make sure student is prepared for the day)
• Teaching and prompting of skills and expectations
2. Feedback from the teacher during the day (after each period of the day) – earn 0, 1, 2
3. Check-out with adult at end of school day
4. Bring home for parent check-in & signature
5. Bring back to school for morning check-in
Daily Progress Report
Aligned to school-wide expectations
Established goal criteria (i.e., 80%)
Optional Reward System Component
Effectiveness of CICO• Based on research-based strategies/principles• Daily positive interactions with adults• Helps to motivate/encourage student• Frequent feedback • Clear expectations• Predictable pattern for students• Supports behavior and academic performance• Involves parents in intervention process• Addresses antecedents replaces negative
antecedents with consistent positive antecedentsCrone, Hawken, & Horner, 2010
Daily Progress Report
Daily Progress Report
https://www.pbisapps.org/Resources/Pages/SWIS-5-Preview-CICO-SWIS.aspx
When to Modify• Collect data for at least 2-3 weeks before
modifying
• Make sure that intervention was delivered consistently and with fidelity
Modifications presented in BEP book:
• goals – more academic driven
• peer reinforcers
• additional check-in
• remove signature portion
Intervention B
PLANNED DISCUSSION
Rationale• A student’s behavior may result from a lack of
information.
• Planned Discussion is an easy, quick, and efficient intervention.
• As an intervention, Planned Discussion is a respectful and potentially empowering way to address problem behavior.
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Planned Discussion
Purpose: To help students understand and address concerns associated with: • Minor but potentially annoying misbehavior• Moderate misbehavior in the early stages• Chronic or severe concerns, as one part of a
comprehensive plan
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Planned Discussion
Planned Discussion has the potential to have a positive impact on just about any behavior.
Because of the powerful effects of a planned discussion, it should be an integral part of every intervention plan.
**Note: Planned Discussion will only be effective for students with sufficient language skills.
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Discussing A One-Time Event vs. Planned Discussion
One-Time Event Planned Discussion• Does not address a
repeated behavior• Brief correction
provided that does not interrupt the flow of instruction
• Immediately set a time to follow up with student
• Does not include other individuals
• Does address repeated behavior
• Conducted outside of classroom instruction
• Conducted during a neutral and scheduled time
• May include other individuals (i.e., other teacher or parents)
Positive Characteristics of Planned Discussion
• Demonstrates concern so that the student truly understands the issues at hand.
• Involves student in brainstorming solutions.• Lets student know you are there to help
him/her learn & grow and that you care. • Action plan for behavioral change is
developed with the student.
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Step 1: Prepare to Meet with the Student
• Identify the Central Concern• Determine Who Should Participate in the
Discussion• Schedule the Discussion for a Neutral Time• Plan to keep a written record of the discussion
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Step 2: Meet with the Student
• Work with the Student to Define Concerns• Brainstorm Actions• Set up an Informal Action Plan• Schedule a Follow-Up Meeting and conclude
the Meeting with Words of Encouragement• Share a Written Record
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Step 3: Follow Up with the Student
• Encourage Student Efforts• Meet Once a Week with the Student • Determine Whether More Structured
Interventions are Needed• Provide continued follow-up, support, and
encouragement
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Intervention C
DATA COLLECTION AND DEBRIEFING
Rationale• Gathering data often solves the problem all by
itself; increases awareness• Because of the powerful effects of a planned
discussion, it should be an integral part of every intervention plan.
• Effective teachers collect data that o defines the problem in measurable termso determines objectively whether interventions are working
• Data will form the basis for assessing fidelity and/or the need for a different intervention
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Purpose
To increase positive behavior or decrease negative behavior with
any behavioral goal through observation, as well as to use a
systematic approach of recording data to gauge the effectiveness of
subsequent interventions.
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Step 1: Choose an Objective but Simple
Data Collection MethodEither use an existing form or record marks on an index card. Some choices include:
• Basic Frequency Count of Misbehavior• Duration Recording• Latency Recording• Rating Scale
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 400
30
60
90
120
Minutes of Non-Participation
> 100 minutes of non-participation
After 8 weeks, about 70% improvement
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Step 2: Meet with the Student (and parents, if appropriate)
• Explain the data you plan to collect and how you will inform the student of the data.
• Meet regularly (at least one a week) with the student to o share and discuss the one-page visual summary of the
data,o review trends, discuss ideas for improving o set improvement targets, and o CELEBRATE progress
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Partner 1:
Review Data Collection Forms:
o Behavior Counting Formso Interval Scatterplot
Partner 2:
Review Data Collection Forms:
o Rating Scaleo Participation Evaluation Record
Share Any Insights With Your Partner
Partner Activity
Intervention D
GOAL SETTING
Rationale• Students who have experienced repeated
failure have difficulty setting realistic goals
• Goal setting o increases clarity of expectations, o helps set attainable goals, and o can increase the student’s motivation
• Learning to set and achieve realistic goals is a lifelong skill
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Purpose
Goal setting helps students identify
what they hope to accomplish
and
actions they can take
to reach their goals.
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Step 1: Develop a Plan• Review the problem and overall student goals
by identifying o strengths, o desired outcomes, and o collected information.
• Select the goal setting format
• Set up the goal-setting conference
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Step 2: Meet with the Student• Help the student establish long-range goals and short-range
goals.• Brainstorm actions to avoid and actions to take.• Help the student identify specific actions the student is willing to
take in order to reach the short-term goals.• Identify ways that adults could help the student reach his or her
goals.• If using rewards, a structured reinforcement system, or
corrective consequences, make sure the student understands all of the contingencies
• Set up regular times for follow-up• Review responsibilities and sign appropriate goal setting form.
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Step 3: Provide Ongoing Support and Encouragement• Provide frequent positive feedback; encourage
the student to keep striving towards his or her goals.
• Correct calmly. Avoid sounding disappointed or reproachful.
• Evaluate the impact of the plan and make needed revisions.
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Intervention E
Cueing & Precorrecting
Rationale
• To help students control impulsive, excessive, habitual, or off-task behavior.
• Children are sometimes unaware of their own behaviors.
• Behaviors can interfere with peer relationships or success in school.
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
What exactly is CUEING?
Cueing is used to interrupt an inappropriate behavior that is
already taking place.
Cueing takes the place of reprimands or corrections that would
be more verbose and that the teacher would end up repeating
many times
What exactly is PRECORRECTING?
Precorrecting is an attempt to anticipate and prevent an
inappropriate behavior before it occurs.
Precorrection:
• a prompt for appropriate behavior • sets the stage for positive feedback
Cueing or Precorrecting?
Nosepicking
Skipping items on tests
Pencil tapping
Disrespectful tone of voice
Chronic pencil sharpening
Cueing
Precorrecting
Cueing and Precorrecting will
fade as the student becomes successful—the more successful
the student is, the less signaling used
Step 1: Develop A Plan
A. Identify possible signals that might be usedB. Identify what adults will do when the
student either responds or fails to respond to a signal
C. Identify other settings/adults to include in the plan
D. Decide whether the student needs to be taught a replacement behavior
E. Identify ways to determine whether the intervention is helping the student reach the goal
Step 2: Meet with the Student to the Plan
A. Review the problem and goalsB. Help the student select a signalC. Explain any consequences that will be
used if the student fails to respondD. Briefly demonstrate and practice using
role-playingE. Set up regular meeting times to debrief
with the studentF. Conclude with words of encouragement
Step 3: Implement Plan
A. Begin using the precorrection or cue anytime the student exhibits the inappropriate behavior
B. Reinforce the student for responding to the signal and/or for not needing the signal
C. Implement evaluation & debriefing proceduresD. Make periodic revisions and adjustments to the
plan as necessaryE. Provide continued follow-up, support, and
encouragement; CELEBRATE
Intervention F
FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION
Purpose
To improve communication/social skills of students whose deficits in
this area may be leading to misbehaviors.
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Rationale
• Students with limited communication/ social skills may engage in inappropriate behaviors in an attempt to get their needs met.
• Poor interactions with peers may trigger conflict or lead to isolation
• Behavior is communication. Need to teach a prosocial replacement behavior.
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Increased Frequency of Occurrence
• Autism Spectrum Disorders• Trauma • Special Education• Need to engage speech-language
pathologists , occupational therapists, school psychs
Step 1: Determine Need
A. Identify the misbehavior objectively;
B. Consider antecedents and consequences to determine if behavior is related to communication/social skills
Step 2: Multidisciplinary Team Meeting
A. Discuss alternative means of communication or replacement behaviors.
B. Determine who will teach prosocial communication skills
C. Include all relevant parties
Step 3: Implement the Plan
A. Teach in contextB. Model and role-playC. Reinforce student when performing
appropriate behavior; withhold reinforcement otherwise
D. Measure performance and revise as needed; fade
http://www.cfchildren.org/second-step/middle-school.aspx
A nonprofit working globally to promote children’s social and academic success
http://www.cfchildren.org/second-step/kindergarten-grade-5.aspx
Intervention G
Self-Monitoring & Self-Evaluation
Purpose
To increase student awareness of a particular behavior so
they can learn to take responsibility for their own behavior and control what
they do
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Step 1: Develop a Plan
A. Determine the behavior to be monitored and evaluated.
B. Identify positive and non-examples.C. Determine when and how the student
will record behaviors.D. Design a cueing system to prompt the
student to record if needed.E. Have an adult monitor and compare
results with the student’s record.
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
B. Set Boundaries Between Responsible and Irresponsible
BehaviorsResponsible Behavior: Irresponsible Behavior:
The teacher asks Joan to sit down:-Joan nods and sits down.-Joan says, “Okay,” and sits down.-Joan does not respond to the teacher but immediately sits down.-Joan asks in a respectful tone, “I need to sharpen my pencil. Is that OK?”
The teacher asks Joan to sit down:-Joan sits down but calls the teacher a name or says “Why should I?”-Joan sits down, but in a sarcastic tone says, “Okay, whatever you say.”-Joan does not sit down or respond.-Joan goes to sit down in an exaggerated slow motion.
D. Develop a Recording System for the Student
• Tally marks• + and –• Circling a symbol or number• Rating scales• Rubrics• Others?
Step 2: Meet with Student
• Review the problem and the goal.• Introduce the procedures that will be
followed.• Review everyone’s roles and
responsibilities.• Conclude the meeting with words of
encouragement.
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Step 3: Implement Plan
• Encourage student efforts• Make periodic revisions and adjustments
to the plan as necessary.• When the student demonstrates
consistent success, fade the intervention. • Once the intervention has been faded,
provide continued follow-up, support, and encouragement; CELEBRATE
(Sprick & Garrison, 2008)
Additional Intervention Resources
• Effective School Interventions 2nd Edition– Natalie Rathvon - Good resource for behavior and academics
• http://www.interventioncentral.org/behavioral-intervention-modification
• http://www.casel.org/guide/ratings/elementary• http://www.behaviordoctor.org/files/books/2014bo
oks/2014PIESV.pdf
Activity• Aggression, Off-Task/non-compliment,
Impulsive/disruptive, Running/flight• This is a list of the most common behaviors Brian is
called for. What behaviors that you work on are as common as these?
• We have these behaviors listed on poster paper. • Work in teams of 2-3 and discuss tier 2 and tier 3
interventions that you have seen WORK to improve these behaviors.
• Write those interventions on post-its and place them on the corresponding poster paper.
• One intervention can be written on more than one post-it to place on multiple poster paper.
• We will share/out discuss the interventions at the end of the activity with the large group.
Function Based Behavior Intervention
Plans (BIP):1. Make the problem behavior irrelevant• Decrease the need to engage in the behavior
2. Make the problem behavior inefficient • Provide a replacement behavior that serves the same
function as the inappropriate behavior
3. Make the problem behavior ineffective • Do not allow the child to obtain what is wanted through
inappropriate behavior
4. Make the plan positive• Write a plan that you would want written for you. If your
plan is dependent on negative consequence, there is a much greater chance that the plan will NOT be successful.
A-B-C Defined
Behavior
Consequence
the student
does (what) ________
_
… because (why) ________
_
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
Competing Pathways
BEHAVIOR SUPPORTPLANNING
COMPETING PATHWAYS
On Mondays and/or when up all of the
night before.
Daily nongraded quiz on previous night’s
homework
Verbal protests, slumpin chair, walks out of
room.
Avoids doing quiz &homework discussion.
Do quiz withoutcomplaints.
Discussion about answers & homework.
Turn in with name &sit quietly w/o interrupting.
+ Give time to review homework.+ Give quiet time before starting.
+ Give easy “warm-up” task before doing quiz.+ Precorrect behavior options & consequences.
+ With first sign of problem behaviors, remove task, orrequest completion of task next period.+ Remove task based on step in task analysis (STO).+ Provide effective verbal praise & other reinforcers.
Teach options to problem behavior:1. Turn in blank2. Turn in w/ name3. Turn in w/ name & first item done.4. Turn in w/ name & 50% of items done.
BIPs Are Action Plans• When writing BIPs, assign people responsible for
doing each strategy/action.• Develop a plan to monitor the effectiveness of the
plan. Always ask “How will we know if this is working? This will require a baseline an the use of measurable data.
• Create a plan that is possible. This may require allocating resources to remediate the problem.
• Expect some time for behavior change to occur.• Schedule a follow up date to review the plan, but
also check and adjust. These plans are more likely than not to involve some trial-and-error.
TEAM TIME• Break into small teams of 2-3• Think of a student with whom you are
experiencing behavioral challenges and we go through a process to match a behavioral intervention to the student’s need. Let’s take about 5 minutes with your team to make best guesses for each step.
12 3-Hypothesis 4-Intervention to
Teach
21 3-
Hypothesis
Bullying• We would be remiss if we did not address bullying
at during this session. • Bullying is an extremely serious problem that is
difficult to address in the timeframe that we are given. The best single resource I have found to assist with both defining bullying for parents, students, and teachers is this web site:
• http://www.stopbullying.gov/• Another very good bullying resource is the Olweus
intervention program. Information about Olweus can be found here:
• http://www.violencepreventionworks.org/public/index.page
Review of Learning Targets
• Identify the continuum of supports for behavior across an MTSS model
• Identify the behavioral process data and outcome data, and understand the application of data-driven decisions
• Identify tools and evidence-based strategies for multi-tiered support of behavior, with a focus on a continuum of interventions.
• Understand how Functional Behavioral Assessments and Behavior Intervention Programs fit into an MTSS system.
Discussion
• Thanks for coming!
• Please let us know what you would like more information on and we will do our best to address them or find someone that can.