Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State...

12
Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State University Literacy Achievement Research Center

Transcript of Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State...

Page 1: Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State University Literacy Achievement Research Center.

Thoughts on the Relationship of

Theory and Method in

Literacy Research

Nell K. DukeMichigan State UniversityLiteracy Achievement Research Center

Page 2: Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State University Literacy Achievement Research Center.

Part I: What Implicates What

• The Theoretical Framework (Theory with a capital T) does not implicate a particular research methodology.

• The topic and extant research also do not implicate a particular research methodology.

• The research methodology is implicated by the research questions.

(Duke & Mallette, 2004)

Page 3: Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State University Literacy Achievement Research Center.

The Theoretical Framework does not implicate a particular methodology.

Dressman (2007) social theory invoked in studies of a wide range of methodologies, including– 3 experimental or quasi-experimental studies– 5 additional studies that employ quantitative

analyses Cognitive perspectives also invoked in

studies of a wide range of methodologies, for example:– E.g., case studies– E.g., discourse analysis

Page 4: Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State University Literacy Achievement Research Center.

The topic and extant research also do not implicate a particular methodology.

For example:• Case study of phonological awareness

instruction• Experimental study of the impact of social

justice education• Instrument development around identity• Discourse analysis of cognitive strategy

instruction

Page 5: Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State University Literacy Achievement Research Center.

The research methodology is implicated by the methodology.

• What is the impact of. . .?• What is the relationship between. . .?• What do . . . report. . .?• How do. . . experience. . .?• How well does . . . measure. . .?• How do . . . convey. . .?• How did. . .?

Page 6: Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State University Literacy Achievement Research Center.

Part II: Education about the Logic of Inquiry

• Recognizing and evaluating the logic of inquiry is not just a matter for reviewers and researchers

• It is also important for those who make decisions about use of research

• Learning about the logic of inquiry should be part of preservice and inservice teacher education, leadership education, doctoral education

Page 7: Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State University Literacy Achievement Research Center.

Part II: Education about the Logic of Inquiry

(First, we have to develop awareness of the need for inquiry:• Sometimes we don’t know what we don’t know• Research allows us to take a longer-term view than

our experiences may allow• Research allows us into places and situations we

may not be able to observe otherwise• Research allows us to pool numbers and our

experiences• Some types of research are completely beyond the

grasp of our everyday experience.)

(Duke & Martin, in prep.)

Page 8: Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State University Literacy Achievement Research Center.

Part II: Education about the Logic of Inquiry

“What matters in the evaluation of the worth of a piece of research, of any paradigm or intellectual tradition, is the manner in which researchers locate their inquiry against a background of extant knowledge and assumptions, the goodness of fit between research questions and methodologies, the quality of the data collection and analysis, and the integrity of the overall warrant for the claims (Howe & Eisenhart, 1990).”

Bloome & Wilkinson, 2008

Page 9: Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State University Literacy Achievement Research Center.

Part II: Education about the Logic of Inquiry

Things you should find totally, or in large part, in a report of research:

• a statement of the research question(s) and/or purpose(s)

• a rationale for the study: why the question was asked – both the problem the research is meant to investigate or address and the research and theory that has come before

• methods used to collect data to address the question(s)

• methods used to analyze the data collected to address the question(s)

• results of these analyses• conclusions the researchers have drawn based on the

results• implications of those conclusions for practice• limitations of the study• directions for future research (Duke & Martin, in prep.)

Page 10: Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State University Literacy Achievement Research Center.

Part II: Education about the Logic of Inquiry

• There needs to be a chain of logic– just because it is written by a researcher does not make

it research– just because it appears in a research journal does not

make it research• We need the whole chain of logic

– can’t go straight from questions to implications– implications have to be part of the chain

• Interpretations of the study should not go beyond the chain of logic– E.g., 3.6 Minutes Per Day

benefits across elementary grades

– E.g., Purcell-Gates, Duke, & Martineau, 2007

Page 11: Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State University Literacy Achievement Research Center.

Part II: Education about the Logic of Inquiry

Strategies for education about the logic of inquiry:

• Professional articles, presentations, teaching about the logic of inquiry

• Professional articles that make the logic of inquiry transparent

• Opportunities to read, listen to, and critique research

• Opportunities to design and conduct research

Page 12: Thoughts on the Relationship of Theory and Method in Literacy Research Nell K. Duke Michigan State University Literacy Achievement Research Center.

Part II: Education about the Logic of Inquiry

A final strategy for education about the logic of inquiry. . .

Conduct logical inquiry (-:)