Thomas' Road Map

Over 25 Years Experience in

Information Technology Project Management

Conducting the Design, Development and Implementation of Project

Management Processes and Techniques to Improve Performance,

Deliverables and Business Results while Monitoring, Balancing and

Continuous Reviewing of the Triple Constraints; Scope/Quality,

Schedule/Time and Costs/Resources.

Skilled in developing a detailed statement-of-work, operations

functional documentation, project action plans, schedules, critical path

analysis, analyze project metrics & statistics, identifying risk and

creating a plan to abate and mitigate the risk, assembling project

team, assigning individual responsibilities, identifying resources

needed, monitoring progress to ensure timely and within budget

completion while implementing processes, which improve operational

efficiencies

Leveraging = People + Processes + Technologies Thomas Grieser

703-787-8777

[email protected]

www.projectmanagerconsultant.com

Prioritization Criteria

• High Customer Satisfaction

• Minimum Impact to Users

• Improvement Potential

• Probability with Quick Results

• Ease of Implementation

• Political

• 25.0%

• 10.0%

• 10.0%

• 10.0%

• 20.0%

• 25.0%

Tasks by Level of Risk by Skill Set

744

xAdministration - Knowledge Transfer

xAdministration - Meetings

Administration

xDocumentation

Documentation

xTrouble Ticket Resolution

xCCRs /NCRs

CCRs / Remedy

xTransport Verification

SAP Support

xDisaster Recovery Site DataBase Support

xSecurity Updates (IAVAs, IAVTs, Patches)

x24 x 7 On-Call Support

xScripting

xData Admiistration

xReview Log Files

xResearch

xPerformance Monitoring

xDaily Monitoring & System Checks

Database Administration

3-High Risk2-Medium Risk1-Low RiskData Base Administration

Resource by Level of Skill Set by Level of Risk by Tasks

335

X60.500.00Administration - Meetings

X51.001.000.000.00Administration - Knowledge Transfer / OJT

X42.500.50Administration - Office Support

4.002.001.001.00Administration

X51.500.500.500.50Documentation

1.500.500.500.50Documentation

X60.250.000.000.25CCRs/Remedy - NCRS / CCRs

X15.251.75Trouble Ticket Resolution

5.500.503.002.00CCRs/Remedy

X3.00System Support - Daily Monitoring

X40.000.000.000.00System Support - Performance Monitoring

X33.001.001.001.00System Support - Review Log Files

X33.002.001.00System Support - Research

X24.501.001.502.00System Support - System Administration

13.505.003.505.00System Support

24.508.008.008.50Totals

3-High Risk2-Medium

Risk

1-Low

R

i

s

k

Highest=1 to

Lowest=6

Hours

Ranking

Total Hours

/Day

[1] Antoine[2] Ailah[3] ChrisCode 421 - Application Support

Systems Engineering Activities in the System Life CycleDoD Instruction 5000.2

Life Cycle

An

aly

sis

of

the

Pre

limi n

ar y

SO

W

Inte

gra

tio

n &

Te

stin

gD

ev

elo

pm

en

tF

ina

l

De

sig

nD

es

ign

Re

qu

ire

me

nts

De

fi nit

tio

nP

rop

o sa

l

CRB

CRB

Schedule Test

Readiness

Review

Software Engineering

Develops System &

Sub -System Design

New

Business

‘Individual

Software Owners’

Reviews Sizing

Estimates

EchoStorm

Reviews &

Creates a Contractual

SOW


Scope the

Level - of- Effort For

Coding


Conducts

Validation &

Verification

Identify

Resource

Types

Schedule

Critical

Design Review

‘Individual

Software Owners’

Develop Test &

Evaluation Plan

New Business

Reviews Proposal

& Re- Submits


Develops

Operator’s

Manual

Software

Engineering

Develops

Admin Manual

Submit

ECN

Owners

Re -Assess Level of

Effort , Constraints

& Risks


Conducts an

Initial Review

Software

Engineering

Develops

Data Architecture

Software

Engineering

Receives

Contractual SOW

Schedule

System

Requirements Review

Software

Engineering

Develops

Test Cases

Software

Engineering

Develops Detailed

Design

EchoStorm

Prepares &

Submits

Preliminary Proposal

Software

Engineering

Conducts Functional

Unit Testing

Software

Engineering

Develops Logical

Design


Conducts Integration

Testing in SandBox

Identify Quantifiable

Metrics

[Size, Complexity ,

Modularity , ReUse ]

Identify

Assumptions ,

Constraints ,

Gaps & Risks

Requirements

Traceability

Matrix

Initial

Capabilities

Analysis

Schedule

Preliminary

Design Review

Software

Engineering

Develops

Draft Design

High -Level

‘Level -of - Effort’

By

Resource Type

Owners

Re -Assess Level of

Effort , Constraints &

Risks

EchoStorm

Reviews

&

Accepts

Schedule

Initial

Technical Review

Software

Engineering

Details

Functional Definition

Software

Engineering

Begin

Coding

Software

Engineering

Develops User’s

Manual

SMEs

Conduct Software

Sizing Estimates by

Resource Types

Information

Assurance

Quality

Assurance

Information

Assurance

Scan

Quality

Assurance

Scan

QA

Conducts

System

Testing

QA

Generates

Testing

Results

IA

Generates

Testing

Results

CRBSchedule

Pre- Production

Readiness

Review

Imp

lem

en

tati

on

&

Va

lid

atio

n

Conduct Pilot

Deploy

Accepted

Pilot

Load Accepted

Solution into

Production

Acceptable

to Deploy to

Customers

Production

Readiness

Review

Operations

&

Maintenance

CRB

Submit Preliminary

Statement of Work to


5

D

18

D

40

D

10

D

70

D

21

D

5

D

D

U

R

A

T

I

O

N

CRB

CRB

CRB

A EVMS of our Cookie Baking Process

Our “Plan”40 cookies per batch5 batches per hour (200 cookies per hour)Schedule: 5 hours to make 1,000 cookiesBudgeted cost per cookie –$0.05Total Budget = $50.00

Analysis after One (1) Hour of Baking We!ve Made...150 edible cookies –some were burnt, some hit the floor, the kids ate some, and fed some to the dog.Actual cost of ingredients after one hour (ACWP) = $9.00

After One Hour of Making Cookies

Spending Plan / Baseline (BCWS) = $10.00Earned Value / Accomplished Work (BCWP) = 150 cookies X $0.05/Cookie = $7.50Actual Spending / Actual Cost (ACWP) = $9.00

Schedule Variance (SV) = BCWP –BCWS = –$2.50 (we!re behind schedule)Cost Variance (CV) = BCWP –ACWP = $7.50 –$9.00 = –$1.50 (we!re over budget)Schedule Performance Index (SPI) = BCWP / BCWS = 0.75 (we!re running at 75% of planned schedule)Cost Performance Index (CPI) = BCWP / ACWP = 0.833 (we!re running about 17% over budget)

Earned Value Management SystemsSample Work-BreakDown-Structure (WBS) with an

Organizational BreakDown Structure (OBS)

Earned Value Management SystemsEarned Value Management Systems

Thomas Grieser5431 Charmont Court

Virginia Beach, Virginia 23455

703-787-8777

[email protected]

www.projectmanagerconsultant.com

Thomas' Road Map

Career

Transcript of Thomas' Road Map