Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

28
Gonadotrofines en IUI moeten terugbetaald worden als eerstelijnsbehandeling bij Unexplained Infertility en Mild Male Subfertility Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar,Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven Coordinator Leuvens Univ Fertil Centrum

description

Gonadotrofines en IUI moeten terugbetaald worden als eerstelijnsbehandeling bij Unexplained Infertility en Mild Male Subfertility. Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven Coordinator Leuvens Univ Fertil Centrum. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

Page 1: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

Gonadotrofines en IUI moeten terugbetaald worden als eerstelijnsbehandeling bij

Unexplained Infertility en Mild Male SubfertilityThomas

D’Hooghe, MD, PhD

Hoogleraar,Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

Coordinator Leuvens Univ Fertil Centrum

Page 2: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

Current regulation reimbursement Gons, IVF and IUI

in Belgium1. Urinary FSH/LH (Menopur): 75% reimbursement- Fertility problems based on unsufficient endogenous

stimulation of gonads- Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COH) for Medically

Assisted Reproduction (ART) 2. Recombinant FSH (Gonal-F, Puregon):- Same indications, - only reimbursed (75%) for indication COH and ART

from 3rd ART cycle onwards, if basal FSH less than 12 (measured at 2 different time periods during Early Foll Phase)

3. Laboratory reimbursement: IUI: none; IVF/ICSI: 1200 Euro if <43, 6 cycles lifetime

Page 3: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

Current regulation reimbursement Gons, IVF and IUI

in Belgium (2)1. Urinary FSH/LH (Menopur): 75% reimbursement- Can be Prescribed by all gynecologists- Reimbursed for all patients for OI, IUI, IVF2. Recombinant FSH (Gonal-F, Puregon):- Can be Prescribed by all gynecologists - Reimbursed only for IVF from 3rd cycle onward 3. Cost for patient per IVF or per IUI cycleIVF (1200 Euro lab reimbursement): 300-400 EuroIUI: (no lab reimbursement or K number): 350 Euro4. Cost for society per IVF or per IUI cycle:Much higher for IVF than for IUI

Page 4: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REIMBURSEMENT GONS EUROPE

IUI IVF/ICSI

BELGIUM 75% 75%

DENMARK 50% 75-85%, max 3

FINLAND 50% 50%

FRANCE 100% 100%

GERMANY 50%, max 6 50%, max 4

Page 5: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REIMBURSEMENT GONS EUROPE

IUI IVF/ICSI

Netherlands 0 % 100%, c2-3

Norway Partial Partial

Portugal 40% 40%

SPAIN 90%, MAX 6 90%, MAX 3

UK 100% (Cond) 100% (Cond)

Page 6: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

Why should reimbursement Gons in Belgium be reduced ?

(1)1. INCREASED COST PARTLY RELATED TO INCREASED

CONSUMPTION, ESPECIALLY SINCE 1/7/2003 (MORE IVF)

Total Million IU used per year (Source)Overall 2/3 IVF/ICSI and 1/3 OI/IUI200024.6200127.4 (+11%)200232.5 (+19%)200342.6 (+ 31%, reimbursement Lab IVF since 1/7/2003)

2. INCREASE IN TOTAL COST HIGHLY RELATED TO REPLACEMENT CHEAPER HUMEGON BY MORE EXPENSIVE MENOPUR IN 2001

Page 7: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

Why should reimbursement Gons in Belgium be reduced ?

(2)2. PREVENTION OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCIES?ANALYSIS SPE 1997-2001

NON-IVF: 6789 DELIVERIES, 743 TWINS (11%)533 TWINS AFTER OI (7.8%)210 TWINS AFTER IUI (3.1%)

IVF: 5247 DELIVERIES, 1464 TWINS (28%)

CONCLUSION: TWIN DELIVERY RATE 10X HIGHER AFTER IVF THAN AFTER IUI !!!

Page 8: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

Why should reimbursement Gons in Belgium be reduced ?

(3)2. PREVENTION OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCIES?ANALYSIS SPE 1997-2001ALL MULTIPLE DELIVERIES ANALYZED (N=2207)

IUI: 210/2207 (9.5%)OI: 533/2207 (24.1%)IVF/ICSI: 1464/2207 (66.3%)

CONCLUSION: IVF RESPONSIBLE FOR 2/3 OF ALL MULTIPLE

DELIVERIESIUI RESPONSIBLE FOR LESS THAN 10% !!!

Page 9: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

Why should reimbursement Gons in Belgium be reduced ?

(4)STRATEGY TO REDUCE N MULTIPLE PREGNANCIES

AFTER

IVF (2/3 OF ALL MULTIPLE PREGNANCIES)

-LIMITED N OF EMBRYOS FOR ET (EFFECT: 28% TO ??)

! LIMIT REIMBURSEMENT OF GONS TO MAX 6 CYCLES, MAX 2500 IU PER CYCLE, AGE<43 YRS,

LIFETIME= FINANCIAL ISSUE, NOT PREVENTION STRATEGY FOR

MULTIPLE BIRTHS

Page 10: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

Why should reimbursement Gons in Belgium be reduced ?

(5)STRATEGY TO REDUCE N OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCIES:

NON-IVF: BOTH OI (25% MULTIPS) AND IUI (9% MULTIPS)

CONSENSUS PROPOSAL VWRG-VVOG-GGOL (MINISTER F VANDENBROUCKE)= LIMIT REIMBURSEMENT OF GONS TO MAX 6 CYCLES, MAX 1200 IU PER CYCLE, AGE<43 YRS,

LIFETIME= PREVENTION STRATEGY (LOW DOSE STEP UP)WITH SECONDARY COST REDUCTION

Page 11: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

9 REASONS FOR GONS TO BE REIMBURSED FOR COH AND IUI

1. COH AND IUI WORKS. EVIDENCE BASED FIRST LINE OF TREATMENT FOR MILD MALE SUBFERTILITY AND FOR UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY

2. GONADOTROPHINS + IUI AT LEAST TWICE AS SUCCESSFUL AS CLOMIPHENE CITRATE + IUI

3. COH AND IUI RESPONSIBLE FOR LESS THAN 10% OF ALL MULTIPLE (ART) DELIVERIES IN FLANDERS

4. MULTIPLE PREGNANCY RATE NOT NECESSARILY HIGHER AFTER GONS + IUI THAN AFTER CC + IUI

5. PREVENTION OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCIES TO LESS THAN 10% PER CYCLE IS POSSIBLE USING LOW DOSE STEP-UP PROTOCOL, ULTRASOUND MONITORING, SELECTIVE FOLLICULAR ASPIRATION OR IVF OR CYCLE CANCELLATION

Page 12: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

9 REASONS FOR GONS TO BE REIMBURSED FOR COH AND IUI

6. SAFER THAN IVF: NO EVIDENCE OF INCREASED MORBIDITY SINGLETON PREGNANCIES, UNLIKE IVF

7. MORE COST-EFFECTIVE THAN IVF. If Gons only reimbursed for IVF, treatment with COH and IUI will become so expensive, that IVF will become the first line of treatment for all infertility with not only increased cost but also increased multiple pregnancies

8. FREEDOM OF CHOICE FOR PATIENT TO CHOOSE COH AND IUI AS AN EFFECTIVE BUT MORE NATURAL, LESS INVASIVE, LOWER DOSED TREATMENT THAN IVF

9. FREEDOM OF CHOICE FOR GYNECOLOGIST, ALSO THOSE WORKING OUTSIDE A OR B CENTRES

Page 13: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REASON 1: EVIDENCE BASED

1. MILD MALE SUBFERTILITY: COHLEN, COCHRANE LIBRARY 2002, UPDATED GOI 2004

COH + IUI BETTER THAN NATURAL CYCLE + TI (OR 6.2)COH + IUI BETTER THAN COH + TI (OR 2.1), BUT ONLY

TRUE FOR GONS NOT FOR CLOMIPHENECOH + IUI BETTER THAN NATURAL CYCLE + IUI (OR 2),

BUT ONLY TRUE FOR GONS, NOT FOR CLOMIPHENE

CONCLUSION: ONLY GONS, NOT CLOMIPHENE ARE ADDED VALUE IN COMBINATION WITH IUI

Page 14: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REASON 1: EVIDENCE BASED

2. UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY:

META-ANALYSIS HUGHES 1997: INDEPENDENT POSITIVE EFFECT OF IUI (OR 2.8) AND

GONS (OR 2.4) AND OF GONS + IUI (OR 5)

META-ANALYSIS COHLEN, proceedings Doelen 2001; update GOI 2004

COH + IUI BETTER THAN COH + TI (OR 1.9)COH + IUI BETTER THAN NATURAL CYCLE + IUI (OR

1.9)

Page 15: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REASON 2: GONS + IUI MORE SUCCESSFUL THAN CC + IUI

1. MILD MALE SUBFERTILITY

COHLEN, COCHRANE LIBRARY 2002, UPDATED GOI 2004

COH + IUI BETTER THAN COH + TI (OR 2.1), BUT ONLY TRUE FOR GONS NOT FOR CLOMIPHENE

COH + IUI BETTER THAN NATURAL CYCLE + IUI (OR 2), BUT ONLY TRUE FOR GONS, NOT FOR CLOMIPHENE

CONCLUSION: ONLY COH AND IUI WITH GONS, NOT CLOMIPHENE IS EVIDENCE BASED TREATMENT FOR MALE SUBFERTILITY

Page 16: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REASON 2: GONS + IUI MORE SUCCESSFUL THAN CC + IUI

2. UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY:

META-ANALYSIS HUGHES 1997:

INDEPENDENT POSITIVE EFFECT OF IUI (OR 2.8) AND GONS (OR 2.4) AND OF GONS + IUI (OR 5)

NO INDEPENDENT POSITIVE EFFECT OF CLOMIPHENE

Page 17: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REASON 2: GONS + IUI MORE SUCCESSFUL THAN CC + IUI

3. META-ANALYSIS COHLEN 2004 (IN PRESS, GOI)

4 RCTS COMPARING GONS AND CLOMIPHENE (UNEXPL INFERT, MALE, DONOR)

(Karlstrom, Balasch, Ecochard, Matorras)

PREGNANCY RATE:

GONS 13% (48/373)CLOMIPHEN 6% (27/428)OR 2.2

Page 18: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REASON 2: GONS + IUI MORE SUCCESSFUL THAN CC + IUI

4. ADVISE EXPERT COMMISSION NETHERLANDS (TFO, 2004)

13 experts in reproductive medicine

QUALITY INDICATORS FOR IUI:Amongst others:- 6 cycles (male subfertility, unexplained

subfert)- Gons for COH, Clomiphene not recommended- Start Gons at 75 IU per day- Increase dose Gons with increments of 37.5 IU

per day

Page 19: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REASON 3: COH + IUI ONLY RESPONSIBLE FOR MINORITY OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCIES (ART)

ANALYSIS SPE 1997-2001ALL MULTIPLE DELIVERIES ANALYZED (N=2207)

IUI: 210/2207 (9.5%)OI: 533/2207 (24.1%)

IVF/ICSI: 1464/2207 (66.3%)

CONCLUSION: IVF RESPONSIBLE FOR 2/3 OF ALL MULTIPLE

DELIVERIESIUI RESPONSIBLE FOR LESS THAN 10%

Page 20: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REASON 4: MULTIPLE PREGNANCY RATE NOT NECESSARLY HIGHER AFTER GONS + IUI VS CC + IUI

1. META-ANALYSIS COHLEN 2004 (IN PRESS, GOI)

4 RCTS COMPARING GONS AND CLOMIPHENE (UNEXPL INFERT, MALE, DONOR)

(Karlstrom, Balasch, Ecochard, Matorras); ONLY Balasch and Matorras with Multip Data

MULTIPE PREGNANCY RATE/PREGNANCY:

GONS 14% (6/42)CLOMIPHEN 10% (2/10)NS

Page 21: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REASON 4: MULTIPLE PREGNANCY RATE NOT NECESSARLY HIGHER AFTER GONS + IUI VS CC + IUI

2. RCTS PROVING THAT HIGH SUCCES CAN BE MAINTAINED USING LOW DOSE STEP-UP GONS + IUI

- Spiessens et al 2003: RCT soft tip vs hard tip IUI catheter

Preg Rate/IUI cycle: 20% (54/267) vs 19% (50/269)Multiple Birth Rate/pregnancy 4% (2/54) vs 6% (3/50)

- Ragni et al, 2004: 50 IU FSH daily + GnRH antagonist + IUI:

Preg Rate /initiated IUI cycle: 34%Multiple Pregnancy Rate: 0%

Page 22: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REASON 4: MULTIPLE PREGNANCY RATE NOT NECESSARLY HIGHER AFTER GONS + IUI VS CC + IUI

3. Retrospective studies.

Dickey et al, 2001, 3608 cycles, 1983-1998

Multiple Implantation Rate per PregnancyCC: 17/176 or 10%Gon: 33/179 or 18%

Multiple Live Birth Rate per Total Live Births:CC: 12/127 or 9.4% (twins)Gon: 19/79 or 24% (20% twins and 4% triplets)

Page 23: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REASON 4: MULTIPLE PREGNANCY RATE NOT NECESSARLY HIGHER AFTER GONS + IUI VS CC + IUI

3. Retrospective studies.

- Spiessens, Castelain and D’Hooghe, 2004, 2423 cycles, database LUFC 1996-2003

Overall LBR/IUI 12.5%; Overall Multiple LBR/Total

LB: 11%

LB/IUI

MLB/ LB

ALL2423

12.5%303/2423

11.2%34/303

CC653

9%61/653

14.7%9/61

Gons1722

14%234/1722

10.7%25/234

Page 24: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REASON 4: MULTIPLE PREGNANCY RATE NOT NECESSARLY HIGHER AFTER GONS + IUI VS CC + IUI

3. Retrospective studies.

Spiessens, Castelain and D’Hooghe, 2004, 2423 cycles, database LUFC 1996-2003

MONOFOLLICULAR GROWTH (n=1170)

LBR/IUI

MLB/LB

CC327

8.3%27

11%3

Gons843

13.2%234

3.6 %4

Page 25: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REASON 4: MULTIPLE PREGNANCY RATE NOT NECESSARLY HIGHER AFTER GONS + IUI VS CC + IUI

CONCLUSION BASED ON CURRENT EVIDENCE:

Multiple Preg (LB) /Total Preg (LB)

1. RCTS: CC (10%) = Gon (14%)2. Low dose step up protocols: 0-6% (Ragni et al,

2004; Spiessens et al, 2003)3. Retrospective studies: variable according to

center and stimulation/monitoring style

LUFC (1996-2004): Gon 11%; Clomiphene 15%Dickey (1983-1998): Gon 24%; Clomiphen

9.4%

Page 26: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

REASON 5: PREVENTION OF MULTIPLE PREGNANCY RATE POSSIBLE USING GONS + IUI

LEUVEN GUIDELINES FOR COH WITH GONS AND IUI:

LOW DOSE STEP UP (50 OR 75 iu) ULTRASOUND MONITORING (AVAILABLE ON DAILY

BASIS) OBJECTIVE: MONOFOLLICULAR DEVELOPMENT, IF 2 DOMINANT FOLLICLES: DISCUSS WITH PATIENT IF MORE THAN 2 FOLLICLES OF 14 MM OR MORE:- SELECTIVE FOLLICULAR ASPIRATION (SHOULD BE

AVAILABLE)- GO TO IVF- CANCEL CYCLE AND NO SEXUAL INTERCOURSE

Page 27: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

4 OTHER REASONS FOR GONS TO BE REIMBURSED FOR COH+IUI

6. SAFER THAN IVF: NO EVIDENCE OF INCREASED MORBIDITY SINGLETON PREGNANCIES, UNLIKE IVF

7. MORE COST-EFFECTIVE THAN IVF. If Gons only reimbursed for IVF, treatment with COH and IUI will become so expensive, that IVF will become the first line of treatment for all infertility with not only increased cost but also increased multiple pregnancies

8. FREEDOM OF CHOICE FOR PATIENT TO CHOOSE COH AND IUI AS AN EFFECTIVE BUT MORE NATURAL, LESS INVASIVE, LOWER DOSED TREATMENT THAN IVF

9. FREEDOM OF CHOICE FOR GYNECOLOGIST, ALSO THOSE WORKING OUTSIDE A OR B CENTRES

Page 28: Thomas D’Hooghe, MD, PhD Hoogleraar, Fac. Geneesk., K.U.Leuven

VOTE FOR VWRG-VVOG-GGOLF PROPOSAL

REIMBURSEMENT GONS AND IUI MUST BE GUARANTEED BUT LIMITED TO PREVENT MULTIPLE PREGNANCIES (SECONDARY EFFECT: COST REDUCTION)

1. MAX 6 CYCLES, MAX 1200 IU/CYCLE, <43 YRS, LIFETIME2. ONLY TO BE PRESCRIBED BY GYNECOLOGISTS

WORKING IN OR AFFILIATED WITH A RECOGNIZED A OR B CENTER

3. IUI SHOULD BE RECOGNIZED WITH A K NUMBER4. PROSPECTIVE REGISTRATION PR AND MULTIP PR VIA

COLLEGE PHYSICIANS REPRO MED