Thesis Presentation - Penn State College of Engineering · 2003-04-22 · April 03 Robert Caruthers...
Transcript of Thesis Presentation - Penn State College of Engineering · 2003-04-22 · April 03 Robert Caruthers...
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Thesis PresentationThesis Presentation
2555 Grand 2555 Grand –– Crown CenterCrown CenterKansas City, MOKansas City, MO
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Robert J. Robert J. CaruthersCaruthersStructural Structural
OptionOption
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
Background of Existing BuildingBackground of Existing BuildingProposalProposalStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisSlip form DesignSlip form DesignArchitectural StudyArchitectural StudyAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachConclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and Recommendations
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
BackgroundBackgroundProject Design TeamProject Design Team
Owner:Owner:The Crown Center RedevelopmentThe Crown Center Redevelopment
Architect:Architect:Zimmer Zimmer GunsulGunsul FrascaFrasca PartnershipPartnership
Structural Engineer:Structural Engineer:KPFF Consulting EngineersKPFF Consulting Engineers
Construction Manager:Construction Manager:Havens SteelHavens Steel
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
BackgroundBackgroundBuilding FeaturesBuilding Features
2424--HighHigh--Rise Office BuildingRise Office Building600,000 Square Feet600,000 Square FeetTotal Project Cost of 75 millionTotal Project Cost of 75 millionStart Date: 6/01 End Date: 6/03Start Date: 6/01 End Date: 6/03Primary functions of buildingPrimary functions of building
--Office SpaceOffice Space--Conference SpaceConference Space
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
BackgroundBackgroundArchitectural FeaturesArchitectural Features
Granite Curtain Wall on first couple FloorsGranite Curtain Wall on first couple FloorsRolled Canopy RoofRolled Canopy RoofPrePre--cast Concrete Panels the rest of the waycast Concrete Panels the rest of the wayArchitectural Glass Windows on exteriorArchitectural Glass Windows on exteriorTotal Height 325 ftTotal Height 325 ftAverage floor to floor height approximately 13 Average floor to floor height approximately 13 ftft
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
BackgroundBackground
Structural FeaturesStructural FeaturesCombination of Structural Steel beams and columnsCombination of Structural Steel beams and columnsLateral Braced Framing in the coreLateral Braced Framing in the coreComposite Metal Deck Concrete Flooring SystemComposite Metal Deck Concrete Flooring SystemRolled Canopy RoofRolled Canopy RoofMostly Shear ConnectionsMostly Shear ConnectionsFloor slab thickness is 6”Floor slab thickness is 6”
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
BackgroundBackground
Mechanical/ElectricalMechanical/ElectricalHeaters range from 5 to 30 Heaters range from 5 to 30 kwattskwattsDomestic Water Heaters sizes range from 40 to 80 Domestic Water Heaters sizes range from 40 to 80 gallonsgallonsAir handling units range from 60,000 to 82,000 Air handling units range from 60,000 to 82,000 cfmcfmFan powered Variable Air volume units ranging from Fan powered Variable Air volume units ranging from 250 to 2140 250 to 2140 cfmcfm5 225 A panel Boards per floor5 225 A panel Boards per floorCircuits range from: Three phase 208/120 volts and Circuits range from: Three phase 208/120 volts and 280/277 volts280/277 volts
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
Background of Existing BuildingBackground of Existing BuildingProposalProposalStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisSlip form DesignSlip form DesignArchitectural StudyArchitectural StudyAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachConclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and Recommendations
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
ProposalProposalStructuralStructural
Looking into the Lateral system that was used in the building
- Existing System: Braced Frame in the Core
- Proposed System:Change the tube steel braced frames
to concrete shear walls
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
ProposalProposal
Existing Lateral SystemExisting Lateral System
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
ProposalProposal
Proposed Shear WallsProposed Shear Walls
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
ProposalProposal
ArchitecturalArchitecturalExisting Exterior Wall:Existing Exterior Wall:
--Granite on the first couple floors all Granite on the first couple floors all around the exterior of the buildingaround the exterior of the building
Proposed Change:Proposed Change:-- Limestone exteriorLimestone exterior
Look at Advantages and disadvantages of each as well as a Look at Advantages and disadvantages of each as well as a cost analysiscost analysis
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
ProposalProposal
Construction ManagementConstruction ManagementProposal:Proposal:
Vertical Slip formsVertical Slip forms-- Use Vertical Slip forms to erect the shear wallsUse Vertical Slip forms to erect the shear walls--Look into costs issuesLook into costs issues--Different types Different types
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
Background of Existing BuildingBackground of Existing BuildingProposalProposalStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisSlip form DesignSlip form DesignArchitectural StudyArchitectural StudyAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachConclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and Recommendations
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisShear Walls Shear Walls
W1,W2 are 60ft W3,W4,W5,W6 are 40ftW1,W2 are 60ft W3,W4,W5,W6 are 40ft
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisFirst Five FloorsFirst Five Floors
#11@5”#11@5”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 6Wall 6#11@5”#11@5”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 5Wall 5#11@5”#11@5”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 4Wall 4#11@5”#11@5”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 3Wall 3#11@5”#11@5”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 2Wall 2#11@5”#11@5”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 1Wall 1
Vertical Vertical Edge ReinEdge Rein
Min Min Rein(V)Rein(V)
Min Min ReinRein(H)(H)
ThicknessThickness
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisFirst Five FloorsFirst Five Floors
Edge Detail Walls 1,2,3,4,5Edge Detail Walls 1,2,3,4,5
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisFirst Five FloorsFirst Five Floors
Edge Detail Wall 6Edge Detail Wall 6
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five FloorsNext Five Floors
#11@7”#11@7”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 6Wall 6#11@12”#11@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 5Wall 5#11@12”#11@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 4Wall 4#11@12”#11@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 3Wall 3#11@12”#11@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 2Wall 2#11@12”#11@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 1Wall 1
Vertical Vertical Edge ReinEdge Rein
Min Min Rein(V)Rein(V)
Min Min ReinRein(H)(H)
ThicknessThickness
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five Floors Next Five Floors
Walls 1,2,3,4,5Walls 1,2,3,4,5
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five floorsNext Five floors
Wall 6Wall 6
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five FloorsNext Five Floors
#9@13”#9@13”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 6Wall 6#9@13”#9@13”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 5Wall 5#9@13”#9@13”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 4Wall 4#9@13”#9@13”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 3Wall 3#9@13”#9@13”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 2Wall 2#9@13”#9@13”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 1Wall 1
Vertical Vertical Edge ReinEdge Rein
Min Min Rein(V)Rein(V)
Min Min ReinRein(H)(H)
ThicknessThickness
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five Floors Next Five Floors
Walls 1,2,3,4,5Walls 1,2,3,4,5
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five floorsNext Five floors
Wall 6Wall 6
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five FloorsNext Five Floors
#9@6”#9@6”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 6Wall 6#9@12”#9@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 5Wall 5#9@12”#9@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 4Wall 4#9@12”#9@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 3Wall 3#9@12”#9@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 2Wall 2#9@12”#9@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 1Wall 1
Vertical Vertical Edge ReinEdge Rein
Min Min Rein(V)Rein(V)
Min Min ReinRein(H)(H)
ThicknessThickness
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five Floors Next Five Floors
Walls 1,2,3,4,5Walls 1,2,3,4,5
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five floorsNext Five floors
Wall 6Wall 6
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisLast Four FloorsLast Four Floors
#9@8”#9@8”#3@18”#3@18”#4@12”#4@12”8”8”Wall 6Wall 6#9@16”#9@16”#3@18”#3@18”#4@12”#4@12”8”8”Wall 5Wall 5#9@16”#9@16”#3@18”#3@18”#4@12”#4@12”8”8”Wall 4Wall 4#9@16”#9@16”#3@18”#3@18”#4@12”#4@12”8”8”Wall 3Wall 3#9@16”#9@16”#3@18”#3@18”#4@12”#4@12”8”8”Wall 2Wall 2#9@16”#9@16”#3@18”#3@18”#4@12”#4@12”8”8”Wall 1Wall 1
Vertical Vertical Edge ReinEdge Rein
Min Min Rein(V)Rein(V)
Min Min ReinRein(H)(H)
ThicknessThickness
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisLast Four Floors Last Four Floors Walls 1,2,3,4,5Walls 1,2,3,4,5
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisLast four floorsLast four floors
Wall 6Wall 6
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisCost AnalysisCost Analysis
Braced Frame Braced Frame vsvs Shear WallsShear Walls(All Cost analysis was done using RS means Assemblies cost data)
$955,723$955,723$757,192$757,192CostCost
Proposed Lateral Proposed Lateral System (Shear System (Shear Walls)Walls)
Existing Lateral Existing Lateral system (braced system (braced frames)frames)
Cost Savings using Braced Frames
$200,000
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
Background of Existing BuildingBackground of Existing BuildingProposalProposalStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisSlip form DesignSlip form DesignArchitectural StudyArchitectural StudyAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachConclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and Recommendations
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Slip Form DesignSlip Form Design
Composed of three Composed of three SectionsSections
--yokesyokes--waleswales
--sheathingsheathing
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Slip Form DesignSlip Form Design
Lifting JacksLifting Jacks-- carry vertical loadscarry vertical loads
--can hold as much as 25 tonscan hold as much as 25 tons-- hydraulic jackhydraulic jack
-- Provides movement of form in Provides movement of form in increments of 1”increments of 1”
-- Minimum of 3 minute intervalsMinimum of 3 minute intervals
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Slip Form DesignSlip Form Design
SheathingSheathing--1in nominal board, 3/81in nominal board, 3/8--in plywood in plywood
--1010--gage steel sheets as reinforced backup membersgage steel sheets as reinforced backup members
DepthDepth--depends on the rate of slide depends on the rate of slide
--time required for concrete to strengthen time required for concrete to strengthen -- minimum depth 3 ½ ‘minimum depth 3 ½ ‘
-- Recommend 4’Recommend 4’
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Slip Form DesignSlip Form Design
Sliding OperationSliding Operation--most important in order for economical successmost important in order for economical success
-- speeds range from 12 to 18 in per hrspeeds range from 12 to 18 in per hr-- Recommend speeds about 18 in per hr Recommend speeds about 18 in per hr
How to accomplishHow to accomplish-- better job management and planningbetter job management and planning-- Adequate supply of concrete on siteAdequate supply of concrete on site
-- Materials conveniently stockpiledMaterials conveniently stockpiled-- Qualified superintendent Qualified superintendent
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Slip Form DesignSlip Form Design
Reducing Wall ThicknessReducing Wall Thickness-- very important since thickness of the wall changes every 10 very important since thickness of the wall changes every 10
floorsfloors-- With slip forming this can be doneWith slip forming this can be done
HowHow-- shear wall is completed at level where thickness changesshear wall is completed at level where thickness changes
-- Jacks are partially free of concreteJacks are partially free of concrete-- A filler piece is inserted inside the formsA filler piece is inserted inside the forms
-- Can be removed and replace as you go up the wallCan be removed and replace as you go up the wall
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
Background of Existing BuildingBackground of Existing BuildingProposalProposalStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisSlip Form DesignSlip Form DesignArchitectural StudyArchitectural StudyAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachConclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and Recommendations
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Architectural StudyArchitectural Study
Existing FaExisting Faççade:ade:Granite Exterior Type 1, GrayGranite Exterior Type 1, Gray
Advantages and DisadvantagesAdvantages and Disadvantages
Lower rate of water Lower rate of water absorptionabsorption
Will retain its polish longerWill retain its polish longer
No architectural change over No architectural change over timetime
Highly resistive to acidsHighly resistive to acids
More expensiveMore expensiveStrongerStronger
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Architectural StudyArchitectural Study
Proposed Change: Proposed Change: Limestone, Sugar cube finish 5Limestone, Sugar cube finish 5””thick, 5thick, 5’’x14x14’’ panels panels
Advantages and DisadvantagesAdvantages and Disadvantages
Easy material to buyEasy material to buy
Architectural appearance over Architectural appearance over time changestime changes
Could prove to be cheaperCould prove to be cheaper
Absorbs water fasterAbsorbs water faster
Thicker material would have to Thicker material would have to be usedbe used
Weaker compressive strengthWeaker compressive strength
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Architectural StudyArchitectural StudyCost Analysis Cost Analysis
Granite Granite vsvs LimestoneLimestone
Existing Exterior Wall (Granite)
Proposed Exterior Wall (Limestone)
Cost $507,344 $400,894Price Difference $106,450
Using Limestone
Cost Savings: $106,450
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
Background of Existing BuildingBackground of Existing BuildingProposalProposalStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisSlip Form DesignSlip Form DesignArchitectural StudyArchitectural StudyAdvantages and Disadvantages for each Advantages and Disadvantages for each Conclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and Recommendations
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Advantages and DisadvantagesAdvantages and DisadvantagesStructuralStructural
Braced FramesBraced Frames
Advantages DisadvantagesAdvantages Disadvantages
--cheaper overall cheaper overall --more labormore labor-- faster erection time faster erection time --more chance of errorsmore chance of errors
Shear WallsShear Walls
Advantages DisadvantagesAdvantages Disadvantages
-- more efficient design more efficient design --more expensivemore expensive-- less labor intensiveless labor intensive --more planningmore planning
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Advantages and DisadvantagesAdvantages and DisadvantagesArchitectureArchitecture
GraniteGraniteAdvantagesAdvantages DisadvantagesDisadvantages
--StrongerStronger --More expensiveMore expensive--Highly resistive to acidsHighly resistive to acids --no color changeno color change--Will retain its polish longerWill retain its polish longer--Lower rate of water absorptionLower rate of water absorption
Limestone
AdvantagesAdvantages DisadvantagesDisadvantages
--cheapercheaper --thicker materialthicker material
--appearance changes appearance changes --absorbs water fasterabsorbs water faster
--weaker weaker
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Advantages and DisadvantagesAdvantages and Disadvantages
Construction managementConstruction management
Slip formsSlip formsAdvantages DisadvantagesAdvantages Disadvantages
--Very efficient Very efficient --expensiveexpensive-- less labor less labor --more careful planningmore careful planning-- fast erectionfast erection --more mechanicalmore mechanical
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
Background of Existing BuildingBackground of Existing BuildingProposalProposalStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisSlip Form DesignSlip Form DesignArchitectural StudyArchitectural StudyAdvantages and Disadvantages for each Advantages and Disadvantages for each Conclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and Recommendations
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Conclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and RecommendationsStructural DesignStructural Design
Proposed Proposed DesignDesign
√√√√√√Existing Existing DesignDesign
OverallOverallTimeTimePricePrice
I would recommend Existing Design of Braced Frames
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Conclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and RecommendationsArchitectural DesignArchitectural Design
√√Proposed Proposed Exterior Exterior (limestone)(limestone)
√√√√Existing Exterior Existing Exterior (Granite)(Granite)
OverallOverallAestheticsAestheticsPrice Price
I would recommend existing exterior (granite)
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Special ThanksSpecial Thanks
Dr. Boothby Dr. Boothby The Whole AE Department The Whole AE Department Havens SteelHavens SteelHarold Harold PermeterPermeterFriendsFriends
April 03
Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering
Senior Thesis
Q&AQ&A
Any Questions ?Any Questions ?
??
??