Thesis Presentation Design and Construction of a Whole Body Counter for Non-Human Biota
-
Upload
jillian-belcot -
Category
Documents
-
view
129 -
download
0
Transcript of Thesis Presentation Design and Construction of a Whole Body Counter for Non-Human Biota
Jill Belcot Radiation Science and Health PhysicsJarrett Johns Nuclear Engineering
Ethan Werger Nuclear Engineering
Thesis Advisor Dr. Anthony Waker
Construction of a Whole
Body Counter for Non-
Human Biota
Introduction The construction of a whole body counter
to measure radioactivity in non-human biota
Two units built for the examination of beta radiation and gamma radiation
Aluminum and lead used for shielding of the unit
Internal and external dose rates were calculated
Objective
Build two units to detect gamma radiation and beta radiation
Determine appropriate shielding configurations
Calculate internal and external gamma and beta dose rates to the frog from Cs-137
Evolution of Testing Equipment
Gen 1 Gen 2
Evolution of Testing Equipment
Gen 4 Gen 4
Evolution of Testing Equipment
Gen 5
Evolution of Testing Equipment
Evolution of Testing Equipment
Evolution of Testing Equipment
Evolution of Testing Equipment
Equipment Creation Issues Securing over 400 lbs. of pre WW2
fallout lead Creation of mold Welding lead casting mold Heating mold up to 328Β°C Staying on track for both the schedule
and budget
Results
Gamma Interactions
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001
10
100
1000
10000 Background With Sheilding
Series1
Channel Number
Coun
ts
π΅πππππππ’ππ=πππ‘πππππ’ππ‘π πππ‘πππ‘πππ =
285647174345=1.628(πππ’ππ‘π Sec )
Gamma Interactions
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001
10
100
1000
10000
100000
Cs Source With Sheilding
Series1
Channel Number
Coun
ts
πΆππ’ππ‘ π ππ‘π=πππ‘πππππ’ππ‘π πππ‘πππ‘πππ =
1756554300 =5855.18(πππ’ππ‘π Sec )
NaI Detector
πππππππππ¦=(5855.18( πππ’ππ‘π sec )β1.628(πππ’ππ‘π sec ))
30 461(πππ πππ‘πππππ‘ππππ ππ )=19.21%
Gamma β No Shield
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000Background Without Sheilding
Series1
Channel Number
Coun
ts
Gamma With Lead Shield
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001
10
100
1000
10000Background With Sheilding
Series1
Channel Number
Coun
ts
Gamma
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000 Comparison of Shielding
No shield-ing
Shielded
Channel Number
Coun
ts
Beta Interactions
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001
10
100
1000 Background Without Sheilding
No shield-ing
Shielding
Channel Number
Coun
ts
Beta- Cap Efficiency
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001
10
100
1000
10000 Cs 137 With and Without Cap
With capWithout Cap
Channel Number
Coun
ts
Beta- Cap Efficiency
Effects of Radiation Assume the frog absorbs Cesium like a
human, cesium is distributed everywhere in the body
Effects of Radiation β Internal
Effects of Ξ² Radiation - Internal Intake of Beta in the frog is equal to one
The frog will absorb all of the Betas
For Cesium-137:
= 0.18669 MeV
Effects of Radiation - Internal 93% probability that gamma energy will be emitted
for Cs-137
Mean energy per emission is 0.662 MeV
7% of the energy emitted from the gamma particle will stay in the frog.
Effects of Total Internal Radiation β Ξ² and
The committed absorbed dose can then be calculated:
External Beta Skin Dose VARSKIN is a computer code for skin
contamination dosimetry
Layers of the Skin
Thickness (Β΅m)
Mucus 75Epidermis 110
Dermis 300
External Beta Skin Dose β VARSKIN
External Beta Skin Dose Hand Calculation
πΈπππ πππππ=( π‘ππ‘ππ hπ‘ ππππππ π π π½
π₯ πΈπ½)=0.599πππ
π·=π΄π₯1.846 π₯10β13πΊπ¦=2.458π₯ 10β13 πΊπ¦hπ
Conclusion on Dose Rates The frog accumulates the Cesium 137, the frog
receives a higher internal dose than external dose
There is a lack of data on effects of radiation on many organisms, including amphibians.
Many factors affect the amount of radiation that a frog can be exposed to
Conclusion Testing apparatus met our design
requirements and provided accurate results
Based on our detector response, it was determined we can detect a wide range of radiation from background to lethal
Dose calculations proved the frog will be receiving both an internal and external dose from the 1Β΅Ci source.
Special Thanks Thesis Adviser: Dr. Waker Construction of apparatus:
-Tuthill Metal Works-Shurer Custom Machining-Vic Powell Welding & Crane-Bill Battle-Bill Moyer-Rick Werger-Brent Thornhill-John Hart Sr. -Dave Green