Thesis
-
Upload
justin-thornton -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Thesis
Celebrating Service and Honoring Sacrifice This Project is presented to
The Faculty of the School of Architecture
by
Justin Thornton
In Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Bachelor of Architecture
Southern Polytechnic State University
Marietta, Georgia
Spring Semester 2013
Department of Architecture
School of Architecture and Construction Management Southern Polytechnic State University
Student Full Name: Justin Thornton
Thesis Project Title: Celebrating Service and Honoring Sacrifice Thesis Summary: We have been welcoming home our troops from Afghanistan since 2002. Every year, they return home to their
celebrating family, loved ones, and friends. Often, these celebrations take place in simple gyms or warehouses. These buildings do not give the soldiers the respect and honor that they deserve after risking their lives for our country. Architecture has the power to create
the ceremonial spaces that would properly honor these soldiers, their families, and the sacrifices that they have made. This thesis proposes to combine the celebration of soldiers returning home, and the honoring of those who have sacrificed themselves, together
into a single piece of architecture.
Student Signature ____________________________ Date ___________
Approved By: Internal Advisor 1 ________________________________ Date ________ (Primary Advisor) Professor Robert Tango
Internal Advisor 2 _______________________________________ Date ___________
Professor Kemp Mooney
Thesis Coordinator 1 _____________________________ Date ________ Professor Michael Carroll
Thesis Coordinator 2 _____________________________ Date ________ Professor Robert Tango
This project is dedicated to the men and women of the United States
military for their service and sacrifices for this nation.
I would like to thank my family and my fiancé for their continued support
through this project.
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Design Theorem
1.1 Design Hypothesis
1.2 Relevance of the Design Hypothesis in Literature
1.3 Proposed Project Nature, Context and Rationale
1.4 Underlying Principles of the Design Hypothesis to the Proposed Project
1.5 Relevance of the Precedent Analysis to the Proposed Project:
Chapter 2 Design Analysis
2.1 Site
2.1.1 Site Selection and its Significance to the Proposed Project
2.1.2 Documentation of Existing Site Conditions
2.1.3 Topological Survey and Applicable Zoning of the Existing Site
2.1.4 Geographical, Natural and Historical Patterns
2.1.5 Physical and Socio-spatial Patterns
2.1.6 Pedestrian and Vehicular Patterns and Connections
2.1.7 Site Potentials and Constraints to the Proposed Project
2.2 Site Analysis
2.2.1 Site Plan: Physical Character Studies
2.2.2 Contextual Analysis
2.2.3 Figure Ground Relationship and Usage Patterns
2.2.4 Boundaries, Connections, Relations and Emerging Patterns
2.3 Program and Spatial Exploration
2.3.1 Spatial Program Organization
2.3.2 Spatial Adjacencies, Connections, Constraints, and Juxtaposition
2.3.3 Spatial Patterns Relative to Site and its Context
2.3.4 Spatial Explorations and 3-D Consequences
Chapter 3 Design Process
3.1 Site Contextuality
3.2 Program Space
3.3 Sustainable Strategies
3.4 Environmental Systems
3.5 Systems Integration
3.6 Comprehensive Design
Chapter 4 Design Synthesis
4.1 Preliminary Documentation
4.2 Final Documentation
Chapter 5 Critical Response to Design Theorem
5.1 Reflections by Author
5.2 Summary
Design Hypothesis
1.1
We have been welcoming home our troops from Afghanistan since 2002. Every year, they return home to their
celebrating family, loved ones, and friends. Often, these celebrations take place in simple gyms or warehouses.
These buildings do not give the soldiers the respect and honor that they deserve after risking their lives for our
country. Architecture has the power to create the ceremonial spaces that would properly honor these soldiers,
their families, and the sacrifices that they have made. This thesis proposes to combine the celebration of soldiers
returning home, and the honoring of those who have sacrificed themselves, together into a single piece of
architecture.
Proposed Project Nature and Rationale
1.3
This project seeks to provide an experience for the soldiers returning home to Ft. Benning and their families through the
adaptation of a building , memorial and processional path. All this in the context of the Ft. Benning military base in Georgia
on the Lawson Army Airfield.
Underlying Principles of Design
1.4
This project seeks to bring emotion back into a place of celebration . A sense of ceremony and procession and a place to
remember those that have fought and died for this country, but also as a true thank you to those that return.
Design Precedents
1.5
Plaza Seville
Architect: Aníbal González
Built: 1929
Location: Seville, Spain
This project was chosen for its long processional
route from the roundabout on the river through the
park to the main plaza in front of the building.
Along the wall bordering the plaza there are many
alcoves each representing a different province of
Spain.
(10)
(10)
Design Precedents
1.5
St. Peter’s Square
Architect: Gian Lorenzo Bernini
Built: 1656-1667
Location: Vatican City, Italy
This project also has a long procession from St.
Angelo’s Castle on the river to the entrance to the
square before the basilica. This procession is
flanked by buildings instead of trees however
once one enters the square the same sense of
awe is there inspired by the sheer size of the
surrounding colonnades.
(16) (15)
Design Precedents
1.5
North Christian Church
Architect: Eero Saarinen
Built: 1964
Location: Columbus, IN
The North Christian Church is a change of scale.
This is on a more human scale rather than the
grand monumental architecture in Seville and
Rome. Here the architect gets personal. The
processions is a short walk on the path going
through the center of the parking lot and up the
steps to the church. The architect also wanted the
building to speak about what it is. It was raised on
a small hill to denote its importance among the
parking and the houses surrounding and the
interior shows equality and serenity focusing on
the religion rather than a grand sanctuary.
(11)
(11) (11)
Design Precedents
1.5
Dulles International Airport
Architect: Eero Saarinen
Built: 1963
Location: Washington D.C.
The original main terminal for the Dulles
International Airport is different in that instead of
approaching it on center for the entire trip, you
actually are pushed around to the right and
brought parallel to the building. The expansive
interior with natural lighting soaring up into the air
is inspiring as well.
(9)
(9) (9)
(9)
Design Precedents
1.5
Mémorial des Martyrs de la Déportation
Architect: Georges-Henri Pingusson
Built: 1962
Location: Paris, France
The Deportation Memorial as it has come to be
called is a study in minimal but extremely
emotional architecture. As you go down the stairs
and experience that horrible and scary pointy
sculpture you turn around and the claustrophobic
tunnel is in front of you. You get compressed and
saddened as you walk through to the long hallway
in which there are 200,000 lights representing the
people taken away by the Nazis.
(18) (17)
(17)
Design Precedents
1.5
Vietnam Memorial
Architect: Maya Lin
Built: 1982
Location: Washington D.C.
A simple and large yet personal memorial, Maya
Lin designed the wall to show the cost of the
Vietnam War. The names shown are in
chronological order by date of death starting and
ending at the center of the two sections of the
wall. To find a relative or loved one on the wall is a
powerful feeling to see the sacrifice written out
among the nearly 60,000 other soldiers who gave
their lives in the war. Lin made the wall tall but not
overbearingly so on purpose as to not feel
oppressed.
(5) (6)
(7)
(8)
Design Precedents
1.5
Air Force Academy Chapel
Architect: Walter Netsch (SOM)
Built: 1962
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
The Air Force Chapel was chosen as a precedent
for structural purposes. It has a unique shape to
its structure that also affects the interior of the
worship space inside. Its use of underground
space to put nonessential rooms and providing 3
separate worship areas in a very narrow building
space was also helpful to study.
(12) (12)
(14)
(13)
Design Precedents
1.5
Spaceport America
Architect: Foster and Partners
Built: 2011
Location: New Mexico
Spaceport America was used as a study on how
to integrate the ground into the building. The long
straight road leading to the spaceport led to ideas
about a processional path for the project and how
to hide certain aspects of the building
underground when not needed.
(3) (3)
(3)
Design Precedents
1.5
La Hémisphérique
Architect: Santiago Calatrava
Built: 2005
Location: Valencia, Spain
La Hemispheric provided inspiration for possible
entrance designs. Its unique and large opening
doors provide a grand entrance without resorting
to a set of double doors inside. This could be
carried into the project in some way.
(2)
(2)
(2) (2)
Design Precedents
1.5
Freedom Hall
Architect: McKnight Construction
Built: 2004
Location: Ft. Benning, GA
The Passenger Processing Facility or Freedom
Hall as it is called on base is roughly a 75,000sq ft
facility that deals with the logistics of sending and
receiving troops to and from Ft. Benning. It is built
to function and functions well based on interviews
with the staff there. However that is all it does is
function. The large assembly area provides an
open space for dinners and welcoming home
ceremonies and other pleasantries but there is no
feeling put into the building. It simply serves a
purpose and does nothing more.
Site Selection and Relevance to Project
2.1.1
Ft. Benning, GA
This site was chosen because of the student’s knowledge of the area and
accessibility to physically visit the site. Ft. Benning primarily serves as
the armor and infantry school for the US Army but stations several active
duty combat and non combat units at the base. This project is focused on
those active duty units.
Other reasons include it’s size allows greater flexibility with building and
memorial form. It is relatively flat and doesn’t require the tearing down of
existing buildings on the base. The site also allows views of the taxiway
and runway as the plane taxis up to the site.
Existing Site Conditions
2.1.2
Ft. Benning, GA
• Panorama of site along
eastern border road
• View across tarmac
towards runway
• View down road into the
site
Topological Survey
2.1.3
Ft. Benning, GA
• The topographical lines are in 10ft intervals
• The site is at the base of a hill on the flat area
inside the loop road of the airfield
(1)
(1)
Historical Building Patterns
2.1.4
Ft. Benning, GA
• On the right is a
map of Ft.
Benning in 1955
(1)
Historical Building Patterns
2.1.4
Ft. Benning, GA
• Ft. Benning again in
1993 where the blue
buildings show newly
built buildings on the
base
(1)
Historical Building Patterns
2.1.4
Ft. Benning, GA
• Ft. Benning in present
day showing all
existing buildings and
the airfield.
Geographical Patterns
2.1.4
Ft. Benning, GA
• Avg. Temperature
• Avg. Rainfall
• Avg. Cloudy Days
• Sunlight Hours
• Sunpath Diagram
(4)
Physical and Social Patterns
2.1.5
Ft. Benning, GA
Population : 11,091
Males: 66%
Females: 34%
Avg. Age: 22.5 yrs.
Est. Household Income: $49,000
(4)
(4)
(4)
Site Potentials and Constraints
2.1.7
Ft. Benning, GA
The blue outline is the potential site. It
extends out to give the option of
redesigning of the road leading to the
site. The site extends over the taxi
ramp and closed runway to allow
potentially involving the way the plane
carrying the soldiers interacts with the
building.
Vehicular Patterns and Connections
2.1.6
Ft. Benning, GA
To the right is the vehicular
patterns for the site. There are
no roads going through the
middle and only a small two
lane road going around the
perimeter of the site and
another two lane road leading
away from the site to the main
base.
Vehicular Patterns and Connections
2.1.6
Ft. Benning, GA
Here are the taxi paths and
the runway used by the
aircraft that use the base. Not
all the paths were
highlighted, only the ones
used to get to the site.
Contextual Analysis
2.2.2
Site Analysis
• The site is surrounded by the Ft.
Benning Military Reservation
(green)
• Across the river is Alabama (red)
• To the North the city of Columbus is
only 11 miles
• The National Infantry Museum is 2
miles to the North
Figure Ground
2.2.3
Site Analysis
A figure ground showing most of
the southeastern portion of the
main base, the site and many of
the buildings belonging to the
airfield
Boundaries and Connections
2.2.4
Site Analysis
The site boundary runs along the
perimeter road that circles the
airfield. Further expansion to the
north and west is blocked by the
Chattahoochee River and
expansion to the east is up a hill
before it runs into existing
buildings.
The southern border is bounded
by the existing airfield structures
and the taxiway.
Spatial Program Exploration
2.3.1
Program Exploration
These two sketches show initial ideas about how to enter and
leave the site as well as building positioning on the site. The
blue being the site outline, the yellow the roads, the green
the building, and the red the path of the plane to and from the
site
Spatial Program Exploration
2.3.1
Program Exploration
A second iteration of initial ideas with a slightly further
developed entrance and exit strategy for the soldiers .
Position of building and other program to change and be
added in.
Spatial Program Exploration
2.3.1
Program Exploration
Another initial sketch on possible procession entrances for both the
soldiers exiting the plane and entering the building and the families
entering from the other side and going to the seating. This design
was not much changed from the original building that they currently
use. However, the knowledge gained from these few sketches
allowed further exploration of the building design using set
parameters.
Spatial Program Exploration
2.3.1
Program Exploration
The first iteration of the program organization begins with this
sketch. It does not include the site yet but uses different
colors to identify each group that would use the building and
how they flow in and out of the site. Yellow for the families,
green for the soldiers and blue for any employees working
the building.
Spatial Program Exploration
2.3.1
Program Exploration
This diagram is one of the first iterations of the
program organization on the site. The main hall
where the ceremony takes place is in the center
with the secondary program aligned along the
axis. The airplane containing the soldiers would
follow along the taxiway and stop in front of the
building to off load them.
Spatial Program Exploration
2.3.1
Program Exploration
A more refined version of the previous diagram. The
parking and memorial are placed along the entrance
axis for the families. The blue line indicates family
circulation path and the green represents the soldiers.
Here they are both forced to interact with the memorial
rather than have the ability to bypass it completely on
their way to the main hall.
Spatial Program Exploration
2.3.1
Program Exploration
Here the four main pieces of program are
organized onto the site to scale based on
their square footages.
This shows how they come together in
relation to each other and the site.
Spatial Program Exploration
2.3.1
Program Exploration
Here the lines are the possible
main procession lines for the two
sets of participants. The circles are
the main elements of the program
organized along these lines of
procession. The Main Hall being at
the crossing . The parking and
memorial leading from right to left
along the horizontal line into the
Main Hall .
3D Consequences
2.3.5
Spatial Exploration
These sketches are some of the first depicting a
3D idea of the building and the memorial
together. These first sketches are there to see
how the program could interact with the site.
Context and Contextuality
3.1
Site
In order to give the right experience to the people
entering the building there had to be a procession of
some kind. Initial thoughts were to have the
procession lead straight from road, to parking,
through the memorial, and into the celebratory space.
As shown on a previous page. However with the size
of the building and the potential size of the memorial
and parking this was changed and experimented with
several times. Different approaches and a new road
along the river were considered.
In each iteration, the program and procession were
moved around to see about possible new entrances
and viewing possibilities of the program as the
persons approached the building. The idea for the
organization was to create different emotional
transitions with a series of events and controlling
where the visitors and the soldiers would enter the
area.
Context and Contextuality
3.1
Site
The first iterations of exploring how to move into the
site. These sketches show the proposed building at
the very end of the runway with the entrance coming
off the hill to the east and proceeding directly into the
building on one and looping around to the side on the
other.
Context and Contextuality
3.1
Site
Here the procession starts with the making of a new road that
follows along the river and approaches from the North. Here
the building is situated along a taxiway leading to the end of
the runway. One would park and walk the winding path to the
building.
Context and Contextuality
3.1
Site
This set uses the road from the south as the
main approach. The building remains at the end
of the runway. The path which includes the
thought of a memorial inside it works its way
from the road to the “side” of the proposed
building.
Space and Spatiality
3.2
Program
Here models come into play in order to
visualize the building form. Done to scale and
set on the site this form here is only a slight
variation on the existing building and simply
mirrors it in size.
Space and Spatiality
3.2
Program
The second model of the group attempts to show a
clear separation of entrances from both ends. A wide
side and a narrow side begin to distinguish which group
will use what entrance and it begins to build on the idea
of scale changing from one end of the building to the
other.
Space and Spatiality
3.2
Program
This design splits up the program into two separate
spaces. The flow upwards is to help give the feeling
of changing scale from human to monumental.
However, how the program fit into these spaces
was not thought through.
Space and Spatiality
3.2
Program
This iteration starts to take on a more
manageable shape. The program is
regulated to one floor and the main
ceremonial space is put underneath the
wire structure which would span across it.
The less important program would be
pushed to the outside in the slivers outside
the ceremonial structure.
Space and Spatiality
3.2
Program
This iteration , raises the height of the structure to a
staggering 200ft. The structure starts to follow the
shape of the building and starts to return back to the
middle near the soldier entrance. The exterior
program still remains but has shrank in size.
Space and Spatiality
3.2
Program
Here the main structure gets expanded to enclose
the exterior program and attempt to create a more
flowing look. The memorial begins to take shape
along the skinnier side showing the procession
from the road to the building itself. The structure
has taken to leaning forward allowing some
coverage above the plane.
Space and Spatiality
3.2
Program
Here the exterior structure has been removed and the
main structure extended out past the building to
enclose the plane. The structure stops expanding and
goes straight in order for it to work and not be
stretched too far without the need for vertical columns.
Some design sketches of this iteration can be seen on
the next page.
Space and Spatiality
3.2
Program
Development began on the interior floor plans and
several iterations were produced, each moving
around the entrance and necessaries like stairs and
elevators for ADA and bathrooms.
Space and Spatiality
3.2
Program
The secondary program like the offices and
ready rooms was moved underground from
its original position in the wings outside the
superstructure. Here are a couple iterations
on the lower level design.
Space and Spatiality
3.2
Program
Memorial design was crucial to the procession and the series of events
that the people coming into the building would encounter. Here there are
four nooks created for each of the active duty units on the base. A path
down the middle allows for free movement back and forth without
interrupting people looking at the memorial. This design was changed to
a more uniform look. Units are no longer separate and joined in a long
smooth wall amongst the jagged angles with waterfalls creating a
relaxing and more meditative atmosphere.
Space and Spatiality
3.2
Program
The site design went from a simple straight path into
the building to a circular path that dipped below grade
to allow the cars to pass through without the
pedestrians having to worry about crosswalks and
could simply cross bridges across the road and go
through the memorial to the building.
Final Documentation
4.2
Final Design
Final site model with scale plane. Showing the parking
, memorial , the bridges and the main building.
Final Documentation
4.2
Final Design
Final detail model at ¼” scale. Intended to show
the interaction between all the pieces of the
building at a certain point.
Reflections and Summary
5.1
Critical Response
In reflection this project seemed simple, with its small program and straight forward design intent for the space
inside. However, creating that space that has such importance and that hasn’t been done before is a lot harder than
it seems. This project is important for the soldiers and their families as well as the nation to know that we can do
more to welcome them home. Looking back, the project could have been portrayed more as a movie as suggested,
to get the idea of what was happening inside and during a ceremony. I could have explored more on the dichotomy
of life and death not just with the memorial outside but how the dead return with the living. How they are honored in
the same light as those who made it home. This project doesn’t have to be limited to my site. These types of
buildings can and should be thought of for every major military base in the country. Each reacting to its site, the
base and possibly the city beyond. I was not able to get this project up to the standard with which I was happy with,
the lack of perspectives of the interior and the memorial path did not help to carry across the emotion in the project
and I would have really have liked to get it into a 3D program for those renders and even a walkthrough. I learned a
lot in this project and I hope to continue editing and refining it.
Bibliography References
(1) . N.p.. Web. <http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/>.
(2) Calatrava, Santiago. N.d. Photograph. n.p. Web. <http://www.calatrava.com/
(3) Wilson, Binkley. N.p., n. d. <http://www.wilson-binkley.com/spaceport/>.
(4) Onboard Informatics, . N.p.. Web. <http://www.city-data.com/city/Fort-Benning-Georgia.html>.
(5) . N.p.. Web. <http://www.usmarinetankers.org/in-memoriam/vietnammemorial_lopes/>.
(6) N.p., n. d. <http://www.historybyzim.com/tag/art/>.
(7) . N.p.. Web. <http://adaptivereuse.net/2008/03/04/ark/>.
(8) . N.p., 2012. <http://www.dancarlin.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=32371>.
(9) Temko, Allan. Eero Saarinen. New York: G. Braziller, 1962. Print.
(10) Erika, . N.p., n. d. <http://erikainspain.blogspot.com/>.
(11) . N.p.. Web. <http://www.northchristianchurch.com/pages/churchpictures.html>.
(12) . N.p.. Web. <http://75bestalive.org/history_pages/history_chapel_construction.html>.
(13) . N.p.. Web. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Air_Force_Academy_Cadet_Chapel>.
(14) . N.p.. Web. <http://facadesconfidential.blogspot.com/2011/12/cupples-products-tall-tale-of-american.html>.
(15) . N.p.. Web. <http://groupnameforgrapejuice.blogspot.com/2013_02_01_archive.html>.
(16) Miguel , Altea. N.p.. Web. 3 May 2013. <http://www.panoramio.com/photo/10585949>.
(17) , . "Paris Holocaust Memorial." DER ZWEITE WELTKRIEG. N.p., 31 Dec 2008. Web. <http://www.zweiterweltkrieg.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3959>.
(18) , . "El Imperio Moderno." Blogspot. N.p.. Web. <http://elimperiomoderno.blogspot.com/2011/06/memorial-des-martyrs-de-la-deportation.html>.