Thermal Rehabilitation of Existing Building Enclosures by ...€¦ · Thermal Rehabilitation of...
Transcript of Thermal Rehabilitation of Existing Building Enclosures by ...€¦ · Thermal Rehabilitation of...
Thermal Rehabilitation of Existing Building
Enclosures by Using
VIP (Vacuum Insulation Panel) Sandwich and
Timber Based Panels
Arch. Dr. Christoph Buxbaum
Carinthia University of Applied Sciences
School for Civil Engineering & Architecture
Department of Architecture
www.cuas.at/bph
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
• Ornamented or Listed facades
• Building regulations
• Encroachment of the road
building line with external
insulation is not allowed
therefore
Reasons for choosing inside insulations systems?
Only way to improve the indoor comfort conditions and to
reduce the buildings energy demand and thus CO2 emissions
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Interaction of interior retrofit systems on the hygrothermal
performance of existing (heritage-protected) masonry walls.
Analyzing the influence of different exterior climate conditions on the
drying potentials of retrofitted constructions.
Analyzing the „real“ hygric conditions and probable durability using
transient simulations – no steady state analysis regarding to austrian
codes!
Purpose of our Research Study:
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Clay Brick Masonry
500mm
(19,7in)
Typical historic Austrian walls
Outside
Lime-Cement Stucco
~ 20mm
(0,79in)
Inside
Lime Stucco
~ 20mm
(0,79in)
= Base Case
(Case 1 & 2)
Thermal Performance: U- value = ~ 1.10 W/(m²K) or R = 5,16 (hr.ft².°F/BTU)
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Base Case
Investigated Cases – inside retrofit systems
Woodwool-
Panels
50mm
(1,97in)
&
stucco
Mineral-bound (magnesite)
Woodwool- panels
(Case 3 & 4)
Thermal Performance: U- value = ~ 0.6 W/(m²K) or R = 9,46 (hr.ft².°F/BTU)
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Base Case
Investigated Cases – inside retrofit systems
Mineral Wool
20mm
(0,79in)
Woodwool-
Panels
50mm
(1,97in)
&
stucco
Additional Mineral
wool, without
vapor retarders
(Case 5 & 6)
Thermal Performance: U- value = ~ 0.45 W/(m²K) or R = 12,62 (hr.ft².°F/BTU)
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Base Case
Investigated Cases – inside retrofit systems
VIP Sandwich-Panel
80mm
(3,15in)
&
stucco
Thermal Performance: U- value = ~ 0.22 W/(m²K) or R = 25,8 (hr.ft².°F/BTU)
Combinded VIP
Sandwich Panel
(Case 7 & 8)
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Prefabricated VIP Sandwich assembly
Woodwool-
Board
20mm
(0,79in)
Vacuum
Insulation Board
10mm
(0,39in)
Woodwool-
Board
50mm
(1,97in)
20 10 50 [mm]
Exis
ting S
tucco
Vacuum Enclosure
Multilayer laminate
Main Enclosure
Fleece
Core material
Pressed pyrogene
Silica with
IR clouding agent
Woodwool Boards
protecting the VIP Core
on building site!
Heat capacity cp woodwool: > 2 kJ/kgKThermal conductivity λ woodwool: 0,09 W/mK
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Custom-made VIP Sandwich panels
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Overview - Investigated Cases:
• Different retrofit systems on the inside
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Analyzing the influence of different
orientations?
Driving rain, reduced radiation, etc.
Investigations made for Austrian Climate
Vienna North
and
West orientation
(prevailing weather side)
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Transient Simulations for
typical cross section of walls -
theoretic analysis close to reality
Critical areas (fixing-in timber beams,
corners, etc.) should be analyzed
separately in each case
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Default Program Settings & Boundary Conditions
Analysis performed with WUFI ©
Heat Transfer Coefficient - exterior variable W/(m²K)
Heat Transfer Coefficient - interior 8 W/(m²K)
Short-Wave (Solar) Radiation Absorptivity External stucco 0,40 -
Long-Wave Radiation Emissivity 0,9 -
Initial Temperature in Components 20 °C
Initial Moisture in Components 80 %
Climate exteriorVienna / Austria
North and West Orientation
„Normal“ indoor climate conditions Sine curve between:
20°C / 40% RH. in winter &
22°C / 60% RH. in summer
Calculation Period 10 years, start in october
Impact of reduced radiation or
driving rain penetration, etc??
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
VIENNA NORTH- Orientation
Calculation Results - Extract
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Cases 1, 3, 5, 7 – Vienna North – Years 1 to 10Total Water Content
TWC decreasing
in all cases
Constant Trend
after about 5 years
Higher TWC
in Case of VIP Panels
0 8760 17520 26280 35040 43800 52560 61320 70080 78840 87600
Time - 10 years [hours]
5
7.5
10
12.5
15
17.5
To
tal W
ate
r C
on
ten
t -
Ca
se
s N
ort
h,
VIE
NN
A [
kg
/m²] TWC_Case-1
TWC_Case-3
TWC_Case-5
TWC_Case-7
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Cases 1, 3, 5, 7 – Years 5-10Relative Humidity on Surface of old interior stucco
> 80 %
Case 5, Temperatures > 5 °C, mold growth cannot entirely be excluded
Critical
Limit
For
Mold
Growth
Interface
Drying Performance
Case 5
43800 52560 61320 70080 78840 8760040
50
60
70
80
90
100
RH
In
terf
ace
Wa
ll -
Insid
e I
nsu
latio
n,
Ca
se
s N
ort
h [
%]
RH_W-Surface_Case-1
RH_Interface_Case-3
RH_Interface_Case-5
RH_Interface_Case-7
Time years 5 to 10 [hours]
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
VIENNA WEST- Orientation
Calculation Results - Extract
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Cases 2, 4, 6, 8 – Vienna West – Years 1 to 10Total Water Content
Case 4 & 6
(inside woodwool
panel and additional
mineral wool)
TWC leveling off
after some years
Constant Moisture
accumulation in
case 8 with VIP
Sandwich Panel!
Exposition to prevailing weather side - higher TWC!
0 8760 17520 26280 35040 43800 52560 61320 70080 78840 87600
Time - 10 years [hours]
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Tota
l W
ate
r C
on
ten
t -
Ca
ses W
est,
VIE
NN
A [kg
/m²]
TWC_Case-2
TWC_Case-4
TWC_Case-6
TWC_Case-8
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Cases 2, 4, 6, 8 – Years 5-10Relative Humidity on Surface of old interior stucco
> 80 %
Critical
Limit
For
Mold
Growth
Interface
In case with vapor retardent VIP Sandwich Panel the RH. increases!
43800 52560 61320 70080 78840 8760040
50
60
70
80
90
100
RH
In
terf
ace
Wa
ll -
Insid
e I
nsu
latio
n,
Ca
se
s W
est
[%]
RH_W-Surface_Case-2
RH_Interface_Case-4
RH_Interface_Case-6
RH_Interface_Case-8 Time years 5 to 10 [hours]
Drying
Performance
Case 5
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Dryability of inside insulation systems
Inward drying
possible!
Inward drying
limited due to
vapor retardent layers!
Source: Fraunhofer Institut fuer Bauphysik
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
2nd Step
Field Testing and In-Situ Measurements
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
20ûE
Finland
English Channel 2 Testhouses in
Southern Austria
In-Situ measurement under natural weather conditions
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
HOUSE 1: Wall Exposure north- & westward
West- facade North- facade
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Inside view of test setupWoodwool-
Panels
50mm
(1,97in)
on
Mineral Wool
20mm
(0,79in)
Masonry
VIP Sandwich-Panel
80mm
(3,15in)Masonry
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Inside view of test setup
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Positioning of sensors
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Measurement results (Relative Humidity)
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 2750 3000 3250 3500 3750 4000
Tem
pe
ratu
re [°
C]
Time [Hours]
Humidity
0.10 - RH-VIP-W1
0.11 - RH-VIP-W2
0.12 - RH-VIP-N1
0.13 - RH-VIP-N2
0.14 - RH-BM-W
0.15 - RH-BM-N
Higher RH due to
adhesive
> 80 %
Critical
Limit
For
Mold
Growth
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 2750 3000 3250 3500 3750 4000
Tem
pe
ratu
re [°
C]
Time [Hours]
Humidity
0.10 - RH-VIP-W1
0.11 - RH-VIP-W2
0.12 - RH-VIP-N1
0.13 - RH-VIP-N2
0.14 - RH-BM-W
0.15 - RH-BM-N
Start 04/2009
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
HOUSE 2
Testraum
(Nordansicht)Testraum
(Ostansicht)
Woodwool-
Panels
50mm
(1,97in)
on
Mineral Wool
20mm
(0,79in)
Masonry
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Demounting of inside
insulation
No mold growth observable!
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Conclusion?
Thermal improvment of existing
enclosures with inside insulation
systems is possible
BUT
Hygric conditions must be analyzed!
BEST2 – Building Enclosure Science & Technology Conference April 12-14, 2010; Portland / Oregon
Conclusion?
Moisture response of retrofitted masonry
walls highly depends on orientation!
The impact of driving rain should always
be observed!
Vapor retardent layers inside may reduce
inward drying processes!
Thanks for your attention!!!!
Research work funded by:
www.cuas.at/bph