1 Commodity Database Servers Jim Gray Microsoft Research [email protected] Gray/talks.
Thermal Radiation - III- Radn. energy exchange between gray surfaces
-
Upload
tmuliya -
Category
Engineering
-
view
860 -
download
0
Transcript of Thermal Radiation - III- Radn. energy exchange between gray surfaces
Lectures on Heat Transfer –THERMAL RADIATION-III:Radiation energy exchange between gray surfaces
by
Dr. M. ThirumaleshwarDr. M. Thirumaleshwarformerly:Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering,St. Joseph Engg. College, Vamanjoor,Mangalore,India
Preface:
• This file contains slides on THERMALRADIATION-III: Radiation energy exchange between gray surfaces.
• The slides were prepared while teaching Heat Transfer course to the M.Tech. Heat Transfer course to the M.Tech. students in Mechanical Engineering Dept. of St. Joseph Engineering College, Vamanjoor, Mangalore, India, during Sept. – Dec. 2010.
Aug. 2016 2MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
• It is hoped that these Slides will be useful to teachers, students, researchers and professionals working in this field.
• For students, it should be particularly useful to study, quickly review the subject, useful to study, quickly review the subject, and to prepare for the examinations.
• ���� ���� �� �� �� ��� ������
Aug. 2016 3MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
References:• 1. M. Thirumaleshwar: Fundamentals of Heat &
Mass Transfer, Pearson Edu., 2006• https://books.google.co.in/books?id=b2238B-
AsqcC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q&f=false
• 2. Cengel Y. A. Heat Transfer: A Practical Approach, 2nd Ed. McGraw Hill Co., 2003
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 4
Approach, 2nd Ed. McGraw Hill Co., 2003• 3. Cengel, Y. A. and Ghajar, A. J., Heat and
Mass Transfer - Fundamentals and Applications, 5th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2014.
References… contd.
• 4. Incropera , Dewitt, Bergman, Lavine: Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 6th
Ed., Wiley Intl.• 5. M. Thirumaleshwar: Software Solutions to • 5. M. Thirumaleshwar: Software Solutions to
Problems on Heat Transfer – Radiation Heat Transfer-Part-II, Bookboon, 2013
• http://bookboon.com/en/software-solutions-heat-transfer-radiation-ii-ebook
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 5
Thermal Radiation – III:Radiation energy exchange between gray surfaces :
Outline…
Radiation heat exchange between gray surfaces - electrical network method – two
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 6
surfaces - electrical network method – two zone enclosures – Problems - three zone enclosures – Problems - radiation shielding – Problems - radiation error in temperature measurement – Problems
Radiation energy exchange between gray surfaces:• Following assumptions are made to simplify the
solution:• All the surfaces of the enclosure are opaque (τ = 0),
diffuse and gray• Radiative properties such as ρ, ε and α are uniform
and independent of direction and frequency
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 7
• Radiative properties such as ρ, ε and α are uniform and independent of direction and frequency
• Irradiation and heat flux leaving each surface are uniform over the surface
• Each surface of the enclosure is isothermal, and• The enclosure is filled with a non-participating medium
(such as vacuum or air)
The electrical network method:• We shall discuss the ‘electrical network
method’, since it is simple to apply and gives a physical ‘feel’ of the problem.
• This method, introduced by Oppenheim in the 1950’s, is simple and direct; it emphasizes on the physics of the problem,
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 8
emphasizes on the physics of the problem, and is easy to apply.
• Before we introduce this method, let us define two new quantities, viz. irradiation and radiosity: (See Fig. 13.25)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 9
• Irradiation, (G): is the total radiation incident upon a surface per unit time, per unit area (W/m2).
• Radiosity, (J): is the total radiation leaving a surface, with no regard for its origin (i.e., reflected plus emitted from the surface) per unit time, per unit area (W/m2).
• Now, from Fig.(13.25), it is clear that total radiation leaving the surface (i.e. Radiosity, J) is:
• For a gray, opaque (τ = 0) surface, we have:
J ρ G. ε E b.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 10
have:
• Therefore,
ρ 1 α( ) 1 ε( ) ...from Kirchoff's law
J 1 ε( ) G. ε E b.
or, GJ ε E b
.
1 ε( )
• Now, net rate of radiation energy transfer from the surface is given by: (rate of radiation energy leaving the surface minus the rate of radiation energy incident on the surface), i.e. Q
AJ G
Q J ε E b.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 11
• Therefore,
i.e. Q
AJ
J ε E b.
1 ε
Qε A.
1 εE b J.
i.e. QE b J
1 ε( )
A ε.
W.....(13.48)
• By analogy with Ohm’s law, we can think of Q in eqn.(13.48) as a current flowing through a potential difference (Eb-J), and the factor (1-ε)/A.ε as the resistance.
• Now, this resistance is the resistance to the flow of radiant heat due to the nature of the surface and is known as ‘surface resistance (R)’.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 12
and is known as ‘surface resistance (R)’. • i.e.
• Surface resistance for a surface ‘i’ is shown schematically in Fig. (13.26,a).
R1 ε( )
A ε.....surface resistance
• For a black body emissivity ε = 1; so, the surface resistance is zero, and
• Also, many surfaces in numerous applications are adiabatic, i.e. well insulated, and net heat transfer
J i E bi ...for a black body....(13.49)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 13
insulated, and net heat transfer through such a surface is zero, since in steady state, all the heat incident on such a surface is re-radiated. These are known as re-radiating surfaces.
• Walls of a furnace is the familiar example of a re-radiating surface. Obviously, for a re-radiating surface, Qi = 0, and from eqn. (13.48) we get:
• Note that the temperature of a re-radiating J i E bi σ T i
4. ....for a re-radiating surface....(13.50)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 14
• Note that the temperature of a re-radiating surface can be calculated from the above eqn; further, note that this temperature is independent of the emissivity of the surface.
• Again, consider two diffuse, gray and opaque surfaces i and j, maintained at uniform temperatures Ti and Tj, exchanging heat with each other.
• Then, remembering the definitions of radiosity and view factor, we can write for the radiation leaving surface ‘i’ that strikes
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 15
the radiation leaving surface ‘i’ that strikes surface ‘j’:
• Similarly, for surface j, we have:
Q i A i F ij. J i
.
Q j A j F ji. J j
.
• Therefore, net heat interchange between surfaces i and j is:
Q ij A i F ij. J i
. A j F ji. J j
.
i.e. Q ij A i F ij. J i J j
. W..(13.51)..since A i F ij. A j F ji
. ...by reciprocity.
i.e. Q ijJ i J j
1W....(13.52)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 16
• Again, by analogy with Ohm’s law, we can write eqn. (13.52) as:
1
A i F ij.
Q ijJ i J j
R ijW
where, R ij1
A i F ij.
...(13.53)
• Rij is known as ‘space resistance’ and it represents the resistance to radiative heat flow between the radiosity potentials of the two surfaces, due to their relative orientation and spacing.
• Space resistance is illustrated
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 17
• Space resistance is illustrated in Fig. (13.26,b).
• Note from eqn. (13.52) that if Ji > Jj, net heat transfer is from surface i to surface j; otherwise, the net heat transfer is from surface j to surface i.
• Thus, for each diffuse, gray, opaque surface, in radiant heat exchange with other surfaces of an enclosure, there are two resistances, viz. the surface resistance, Ri = (1- εi)/(Ai.εi), and a space resistance, Rij = 1/(Ai.Fij).
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 18
• For a N surface enclosure, net heat transfer from surface ‘i’ should be equal to the sum of net heat transfers from that surface to the remaining surfaces. i.e.
• This situation is shown in Fig. (13.27).
Q i1
N
j
Q ij= 1
N
j
A i F ij. J i J j
.
= 1
N
j
J i J j
R ij=
...W....(13.54)
i.e.E bi J i
R i 1
N
j
J i J j
R ij=
W...(13.55)
J
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 19
Fig. 13.27 Radiation heat transfer from surface ito other surfaces in a N-surface enclosure
Surface i
JiEbi
Qi
Ri
J1
J2
JN-1
JN
Ri1 Ri2
Ri(N-1)
RiN
• As can be seen from the above fig., rate of radiation ‘current’ flow to surface ‘i’ through its surface resistance must be equal to the sum of all the radiation current flows from surface ‘i’ to all other surfaces through the respective space resistances.
• In general, there two types of radiation problems:
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 20
problems:• first (and most common), when the surface
temperature Ti, and therefore, the emissive power Ebi is known;
• and, the second type is when the net radiation heat transfer at the surface i is known.
• Eqn. (13.55) is useful in solving the first type of problems, i.e. when the surface temperature is known; instead, if the net heat transfer rate at the surface is the known quantity, eqn. (13.52) is the applicable equation.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 21
• Essentially, the problem is to solve for the radiosities J1, J2,….Jn.
• Electrical network method is convenient to use if the number of surfaces in an enclosure is limited to about five.
• If the number of surfaces is more than five, the direct approach is to apply eqn. (13.55) for each surface whose temperature is known, and eqn. (13.52) for each surface at which the net heat transfer rate is known, and solve the resulting set of N linear, algebraic equations for the N unknowns, viz. J1, J2,…Jn by standard
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 22
mathematical methods. • Once the radiosities are known, eqn. (13.48)
may be applied to determine either the heat transfer rate or the temperature, as the case may be.
Radiation heat exchange in two-zone enclosures:• Two-zone enclosure- simply means that the two
surfaces, together, make up the enclosure and ‘see’ only themselves and nothing else.
• Many, practically important geometries may be classified as two-zone enclosures, eg. a small body enclosed by a large body, a pipe passing
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 23
classified as two-zone enclosures, eg. a small body enclosed by a large body, a pipe passing through a large room, concentric spheres, concentric, long cylinders , long, parallel plane surfaces, etc.
• Fig. (13.28) shows a schematic of a typical two-zone enclosure and the associated radiation (or, thermal) network.
• Surfaces 1 and 2 forming the enclosure are diffuse, gray and opaque.
• Let their emissivities, temperatures and areas be (ε1, T1, A1) and (ε2, T2, A2) respectively.
• The radiation network is shown in Fig. 13.28.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 24
in Fig. 13.28. • Each surface has one surface
resistance associated with it and there is one space resistance between the two radiosity potentials, and all the resistances are in series, as shown.
• The ‘heat current’ (Q12) in this circuit is calculated by dividing the ‘total potential’ (Eb1 – Eb2) by the ‘total resistance’ (R1 + R12 +R2). So, we write:
Q 12 Q 1 Q 2E b1 E b2
R 1 R 12 R 2
i.e. Q 12E b1 E b2
1 ε 1 1 1 ε 2
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 25
A 1 ε 1. A 1 F 12
. A 2 ε 2.
i.e. Q 12σ T 1
4 T 24.
1 ε 1
A 1 ε 1.
1
A 1 F 12.
1 ε 2
A 2 ε 2.
W......(13.56)
Eqn. (13.56) is an important equation, which gives net rate of heattransfer between two gray, diffuse, opaque surfaces which form anenclosure, i.e. which ‘see’ only each other and nothing else.
• Let us consider a few special cases of two-surface enclosure:
• Case (i): Radiant heat exchange between two black surfaces:
• For a black body, ε = 1, and J = Eb, as explained earlier. i.e. surface resistance [= (1 - ε)/(A.ε)] of a black body is zero.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 26
[= (1 - ε)/(A.ε)] of a black body is zero. Then, the radiation network will consist of only a space resistance between the two radiosity potentials, as shown in Fig. (13.29):
• Then, from eqn. (13.56), we get:
Fig. 13.29 Radiation network for two blacksurfaces forming an enclosure
Eb1= J1
R12 = 1/(A1.F12 )
Q12Eb2= J2
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 27
Q 12σ T 1
4 T 24.
1
A 1 F 12.
i.e. Q 12 A 1 F 12. σ. T 1
4 T 24. W....for two black surfaces forming an
enclosure....(13.57)
• Next, we shall consider four cases of practical interest where the view factor between the inner surface 1 and the outer surface 2 (i.e. F12) is equal to 1:
• Case (ii): Radiant heat exchange for a small object in a large cavity:
• See Fig. (13.30,a). A practical example of a small object in a large cavity is the case of a steam pipe passing through a large plant room.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 28
through a large plant room.• For this case, we have:
A 1
A 20
and, F 12 1
• And, eqn.(13.56) becomes:
• Case (iii): Radiant heat exchange between infinitely large parallel plates:
• See Fig. (13.30,b). In this case, A1 = A2 = A, say, and F12 = 1.
Q 12 A 1 σ. ε 1. T 1
4 T 24. ....for small object in a large cavity.....(13.58)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 29
A, say, and F12 = 1. • Then, eqn. (13.56) becomes:
Q 12A σ. T 1
4 T 24.
1
ε 1
1
ε 21
....for infinitely large parallel plates.....(13.59)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 30
Fig. 13.30. Important ‘two surface enclosures’.
• Case (iv): Radiant heat exchange between infinitely long concentric cylinders:
• See Fig. (13.30,c). In this case:
• Then, eqn. (13.56) becomes:
F 12 1
Q 12A 1 σ. T 1
4 T 24.
1
ε 1
A 1
A 2
1
ε 21.
....for infinitely long concentric cylinders.....(13.60)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 31
• Remember that A1 refers to the inner (or enclosed) surface.• Eqn. (13.60) is known as ‘Christiansen’s equation’.
where
A 1
A 2
r 1
r 2
• Case (v): Radiant heat exchange between concentric spheres:
• See Fig. (13.30,d). In this case:• Then, eqn. (13.56) becomes:
F 12 1
Q 12A 1 σ. T 1
4 T 24.
1
ε 1
A 1
A 2
1
ε 21.
....for concentric spheres.....(13.61)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 32
• Remember, again, that A1 refers to the inner (or enclosed) surface.
1 2 2
where
A 1
A 2
r 1
r 2
2
Problems on two-surface enclosures:
• Example 13.19 (M.U. 1991): A long pipe, 50 mm in diameter, passes through a room and is exposed to air at 20 deg. C. Pipe surface temperature is 93 deg.C. Emissivity of the surface is 0.6. Calculate the net radiant heat loss surface is 0.6. Calculate the net radiant heat loss per metre length of pipe.
• Solution:• The pipe is enclosed by the room; so, it is two-surface enclosure
problem. Further, area of the pipe is very small, compared to the area of the room. Therefore, this is a case of a small object surrounded by a large area, and we have:
Aug. 2016 33MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 34MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 35MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 36
This is a two-zone enclosure problem.Fig. shows the radiation network for this problem.
MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
We have:
Aug. 2016 37MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 38MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 39MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 40MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 41MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 42MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Radiation heat exchange in three zone enclosures:• Fig. (13.32,a) shows an enclosure made of three
opaque, diffuse, gray surfaces. • Let the surfaces A1, A2, A3 be maintained at uniform
temperatures of T1, T2 and T3 respectively. Also, let the emissivities be ε1, ε2 and ε3 respectively.
• The radiation network for this system of three surface
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 43
• The radiation network for this system of three surface enclosure is shown in Fig. (13.32,b).
• While drawing the radiation network, the principle to be followed is quite simple: first, draw the surface resistance associated with each gray surface; then, connect the radiosity potentials between surfaces by the respective space resistances.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 44
• It is considered that the temperature of each surface is known; i.e. emissive power Eb for each surface is known.
• Then, the problem reduces to determining the radiosities J1, J2 and J3.
• This is done by applying Kirchoff’s law of
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 45
• This is done by applying Kirchoff’s law of d.c. circuits to each node: i.e. sum of the currents (or, rate of heat transfers) entering into each node is zero.
• Doing this, we get the following three algebraic equations:
Node J1:E b1 J 1
R 1
J 2 J 1
R 12
J 3 J 1
R 130 .....(13.63,a)
Node J2:E b2 J 2
R 2
J 1 J 2
R 12
J 3 J 2
R 230 .....(13.63,b)
Node J :E b3 J 3 J 1 J 3 J 2 J 3
0 .....(13.63,c)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 46
• Solving these three eqns. simultaneously, we get J1, J2and J3.
• Remember to write each eqn. such that current flows into the node; then, the magnitudes of the radiosities would adjust themselves when all the three equations are solved simultaneously.
Node J3: b3 3
R 3
1 3
R 13
2 3
R 230 .....(13.63,c)
• Once the magnitudes of the radiosities are known, expressions for net heat flows betweenthe surfaces are:
Q 12J 1 J 2
R 12
J 1 J 2
1
A 1 F 12.
....(13.64,a)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 47
Q 13J 1 J 3
R 13
J 1 J 3
1
A 1 F 13.
....(13.64,b)
Q 23J 2 J 3
R 23
J 1 J 2
1
A 2 F 23.
....(13.64,c)
• And, net heat flow from each surface is:
Q 1E b1 J 1
R 1
E b1 J 1
1 ε 1
A 1 ε 1.
.....(13.65,a)
QE b2 J 2 E b2 J 2 .....(13.65,b)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 48
Q 2b2 2
R 2
b2 2
1 ε 2
A 2 ε 2.
.....(13.65,b)
Q 3E b3 J 3
R 3
E b3 J 3
1 ε 3
A 3 ε 3.
.....(13.65,c)
• Eqn. set (13.64) is a set of general equations for three diffuse, opaque, gray surfaces.
• However, these equations will be modified depending upon any constraint that may be attached to any of the surfaces, i.e.
• say, if the surface is black or re-radiating:
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 49
• say, if the surface is black or re-radiating:Ji = Ebi = σ.Ti
4. • And, Qi = 0 for a re-radiating surface. • If Qi at any surface is specified instead of
the temperature (i,.e. Ebi), then, (Ebi – Ji)/Ri is replaced by Qi.
Few special cases of three-zone enclosures:• Case (i): Two black surfaces connected to a
third refractory surface:• This is a three-zone enclosure, with two of the
surfaces being black and the third surface being a re-radiating, insulated surface.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 50
a re-radiating, insulated surface. • Typical example is a furnace whose bottom is
the ‘source’ and the top is the ‘sink’ and the two surfaces are connected by a refractory wall which acts as a re-radiating surface.
• In effect, the source and sink exchange heat through the re-radiating wall.
• However, in steady state, the re-radiating wall radiates as much heat as it receives, which means that net heat exchange through the re-radiating wall (= Q) is zero, i.e. Eb = J for the re-radiating wall.
• Therefore, once J (i.e. Eb) is calculated for the re-radiating surface, its steady state
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 51
bthe re-radiating surface, its steady state temperature can easily be calculated from: Eb = σ. T4.
Eb1= J1
E = J R
Eb2 = J2
R12
R12=1/(A1.F12 )
EbR= JR
R2R R1R
R1R=1/(A1.F1R )
R2R=1/(A2.F2R )
Fig.(a)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 52
Fig. 13.33 Two black surfaces connected by a third re-radiatingsurface and its radiation network
Eb1 = J1 Eb2 = J2R12
R2R R1R JR
Fig.(b)
• The radiation network is drawn very easily by remembering the usual principles, i.e.
• for a black surface, the surface resistance is zero, i.e. Eb = J.
• For a re-radiating surface too, Eb = J, as already explained;
• Further, for a re-radiating surface, Q = 0. • Between two given surfaces, the radiosity
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 53
• Between two given surfaces, the radiositypotentials are connected by the respective space resistances, as shown.
• It may be observed that the system reduces to a series-parallel circuit of resistances as shown in Fig. (13.33,b).
• So, we write, for the total resistance of the circuit, Rtot:
1
R tot
1
R 12
1
R 1R R 2R
and, Q 12E b1 E b2
R totE b1 E b2
1
R 12
1
R 1R R 2R
.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 54
• Here, Q12 is the net radiant heat transferred between surfaces 1 and 2. Similar expressions can be written for heat transfer between surfaces 2 and 3 (= Q23) and the heat transfer between surfaces 1 and 3 (= Q13).
i.e. Q 12 σ T 14 T 2
4. A 1 F 12. 1
1
A 1 F 1R.
1
A 2 F 2R.
. .....(13.66)
Case (ii): Two gray surfaces surrounded by a third re-radiating surface:
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 55
• In this case, there are two gray surfaces, and the third surface is an insulated, re-radiating surface.
• As already explained, the re-radiating surface radiates as much energy as it receives; therefore, net radiant heat transfer for that surface is zero, i.e. Q 3 0
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 56
surface is zero, i.e. Q 3 0
i.e.E b3 J 3
1 ε 3
A 3 ε 3.
0
i.e. E b3 J 3
• i.e. once the radiosity of the re-radiating surface is known, its temperature can easily be calculated, since Eb3 = σ.T3
4. • Further, note that T3 is independent of the
emissivity of surface 3.• Now, the radiation network reduces to a simple
series-parallel circuit of the relevant resistances.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 57
series-parallel circuit of the relevant resistances.• Expression for heat flow rate is:
Q 1 Q 2E b1 E b2
R tot
where, Rtot is the total resistance, given by:
R tot R 11
1
R 12
1
R 13 R 23
R 2
i.e. R tot1 ε 1
A 1 ε 1.
1
A 1 F 12. 1
1 1
1 ε 2
A 2 ε 2.
....(13.67)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 58
1
A 1 F 13.
1
A 2 F 23.
Aug. 2016 59MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 60MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 61MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 62MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 63MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Radiation shielding:
• One or more ‘radiation shields’ are used to reduce radiant heat transfer between two given surfaces.
• Radiation shield is, simply a thin, high reflectivity
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 64
• Radiation shield is, simply a thin, high reflectivity surface placed in between the surfaces which exchange heat between themselves.
• Radiation shields may be made of aluminium foils, copper foils, or aluminized mylar sheets etc.
• Fig. (13.36,a) shows to large parallel plates, 1 and 2 exchanging heat between themselves;
• Let their areas, temperatures (in Kelvin) and emissivities be (A1, T1, ε1) and (A2, T2, ε2).
• Let a radiation shield 3, be placed between these plates. Plate 3 is thin and made of a material of high reflectivity.
• Let the emissivities of two sides of the radiation shield be ε and ε as shown.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 65
shield be ε3-1 and ε3-2 as shown. • Radiation network for this system is shown in
Fig. (13.36,b). • This is drawn, as usual, remembering that each
gray surface has a ‘surface resistance’ associated with it, and the two radiosity potentials are connected by a ‘space resistance’.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 66
• When there is no shield, the radiation heat transfer between plates 1 and 2 is already shown to be:
• With one shield placed between plates 1 and 2,
Q 12A σ. T 1
4 T 24.
1
ε 1
1
ε 21
....for infinitely large parallel plates.....(13.59)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 67
• With one shield placed between plates 1 and 2, the radiation network will be as shown in Fig. (b) above.
• Note that now all the relevant resistances are in series.
• Net heat transfer between plates 1 and 2is given as:Q12-one shield = (Eb1-Eb2)/Rtot where Rtot is
the total resistance.• i.e.
E b1 E b2
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 68
Q 12_one_shieldE b1 E b2
1 ε 1
A 1 ε 1.
1
A 1 F 13.
1 ε 3_1
A 3 ε 3_1.
1 ε 3_2
A 3 ε 3_2.
1
A 3 F 32.
1 ε 2
A 2 ε 2.
....for two gray surfaces with one radiation shield placed in between.....(13.70)
• Now, for two large parallel plates, we note:
• Then, eqn. (13.70) simplifies to:
F 13 F 32 1 and, A 1 A 2 A 3 A
Q 12_one_shieldA σ. T 1
4 T 24.
1 11
1 11
....(13.71)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 69
• Note that as compared to eqn. (13.59) for the case of no-shield, we have, with one shield, an additional term appearing in the denominator of eqn. (13.71).
1
ε 1
1
ε 21
1
ε 3_1
1
ε 3_21
• Therefore, if there are N radiation shields, we have, for net radiation heat transfer:
• If emissivities of all surfaces are equal, eqn. (13.72) becomes:
Q 12N_shields
A σ. T 14 T 2
4.
1
ε 1
1
ε 21
1
ε 3_1
1
ε 3_21 .....
1
ε N_1
1
ε N_21
...(13.72)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 70
(13.72) becomes:
Q 12N_shields
A σ. T 14 T 2
4.
N 1( )1
ε1
ε1.
1
N 1( )Q 12no_shield
. ....(13.73)
• Note this important result, which implies that, when all emissivities are equal, presence of one radiation shield reduces the radiation heat transfer between the two surfaces to one-half,
• Two radiation shields reduce the heat transfer to one-third, 9 radiation shields reduce the heat transfer to one-tenth etc.
• For a more practical case of the two surfaces having ε ε
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 71
emissivities of ε1 and ε2, and all shields having the same emissivity of εs, eqn. (13.72) becomes:
Q 12N_shields
A σ. T 14 T 2
4.
1
ε 1
1
ε 21 N
2
ε s1.
....(13.74)
• To determine the equilibrium temperature of the radiation shield:
• Once Q12 is determined from eqn. (13.71), the temperature of the shield is easily found out by applying the condition that in steady state:
• We can use either of the conditions: Q12 = Q13 or Q12 = Q32. • Q13 or Q32 is determined by applying eqn. (13.59); i.e. we get:
Q 12 Q 13 Q 32 ...(13.75)
A σ. T 14 T 3
4.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 72
• In both the above eqns., T3 is the only unknown, which can easily be determined.
Q 12 Q 13A σ. T 1 T 3
.
1
ε 1
1
ε 31
...(13.76,a)
or,
Q 12 Q 32A σ. T 3
4 T 24.
1
ε 3
1
ε 21
....(13.76,b)
For a cylindrical radiation shield placed in between two, long concentric cylinders:
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 73
• Consider the case of radiation heat transfer between two long, concentric cylinders.
• The radiation heat transfer between two long, concentric cylinders is already shown to be:
Q 12A 1 σ. T 1
4 T 24.
1
ε 1
A 1
A 2
1
ε 21.
....for infinitely long concentric cylinders.....(13.60)
where
A 1
A 2
r 1
r 2
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 74
• Now, let a cylindrical radiation shield, 3, be placed in between the inner cylinder (1) and the outer cylinder (2), as shown in Fig.
• The radiation network for this system is exactly the same as shown in Fig. (13.36,b):
• And, the radiation heat transfer between cylinders 1 and 2, when the shield is present, is given by:
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 75
2, when the shield is present, is given by:
• Now, for the cylindrical system, we have:
Q 12_one_shieldE b1 E b2
1 ε 1
A 1 ε 1.
1
A 1 F 13.
1 ε 3_1
A 3 ε 3_1.
1 ε 3_2
A 3 ε 3_2.
1
A 3 F 32.
1 ε 2
A 2 ε 2.
....for two gray surfaces with one radiation shield placed in between.....(13.70)
F 13 F 32 1
A 1 2 π. r 1. L.
A 2 2 π. r 2. L.
and, A 3 2 π. r 3. L.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 76
• Then, eqn. (13.70) reduces to:
• In eqn. (13.77), we have: (A1/A2) = (r1/r2), and (A1/A3) = (r1/r3).
Q 12one_shield
A 1 σ. T 14 T 2
4.
1
ε 1
A 1
A 2
1
ε 21.
A 1
A 3
1
ε 3_1
1
ε 3_21.
...for concentric cylinders with one radiation shield...(13.77)
• Note that as compared to the relation for two concentric cylinders with no shield (i.e. eqn. 13.60), an additional term appears in the denominator of eqn. (13.77) (i.e. the third term) when one radiation shield is introduced;
• If there is a second radiation shield, say (4), then one more similar term will have to be added in
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 77
one more similar term will have to be added in the denominator to take care of the resistance of that shield.
• Equilibrium temperature of the shield is determined by applying the principle that, in steady state: Q 12 Q 13 Q 32
For a Spherical radiation shield placed in between two concentric spheres:
• The radiation network for this system is shown in Fig. (13.36,b).
• When there is no radiation shield, radiation heat transfer between surfaces 1 and 2 is given by eqn. (13.61), viz.
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 78
Q 12A 1 σ. T 1
4 T 24.
1
ε 1
A 1
A 2
1
ε 21.
....for concentric spheres.....(13.61)
where
A 1
A 2
r 1
r 2
2
• Again, when the radiation shield is present, the general relation for
radiation heat transfer between surfaces 1 and 2 is eqn. (13.70).
• Relation for radiant heat transfer between surfaces 1 and 2, is exactly as eqn. (13.77), i.e.
Q 12one_shield
A 1 σ. T 14 T 2
4.
1
ε 1
A 1
A 2
1
ε 21.
A 1
A 3
1
ε 3_1
1
ε 3_21.
...for concentric spheres with one radiation shield...(13.78)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 79
• In eqn. (13.78), we have:
• Equilibrium temperature of the shield is determined by applying the principle that, in steady state:
A 1
A 2
r 1
r 2
2
and,A 1
A 3
r 1
r 3
2
Q 12 Q 13 Q 32
Aug. 2016 80MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 81MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 82MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Radiation error in temperature measurement:• An important application of radiation shields is in
reducing the radiation error in temperature measurement.
• Consider the case of a hot fluid at a temperature Tf, flowing through a channel, whose walls are at a temperature T .
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 83
Tf, flowing through a channel, whose walls are at a temperature Tw.
• Let the convective heat transfer coefficient between the fluid and the thermometer bulb be h.
• To measure the temperature of the fluid, a thermometer (or a thermocouple) is introduced into the stream, as shown in Fig. (13.39 a).
Tf , h
(a) Thermometer without radiation shield
Tw
qradqconv
TcThermometer
TcThermometer
Tw
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 84
Fig. 13.39 Radiation shielding of thermometers
Tw
Tc
Ts
Tw
Tf , h
(b) Thermometer with radiation shield
• Let the reading shown by the thermometer be Tc.
• This reading, however, does not represent the true temperature of the fluid Tf, since the thermometer bulb will lose heat by radiation to the walls of the channel which are at a lower temperature Tw (which is usually the case).
• So, in steady state, the thermometer bulb will gain heat by convection from the flowing fluid
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 85
gain heat by convection from the flowing fluid and will lose heat by radiation to the walls, and as a result, the temperature Tc shown by the thermometer will be some value in between Tfand Tw .
• We wish to find out the true temperature of the fluid Tf , by knowing the thermometer reading Tc.
• Making an energy balance on the thermometer bulb, in steady state, we have:
• Without radiation shield:• qconv to the bulb = qrad from the bulb
i.e. h A c. T f T c
. ε c A c. σ. T c
4 T w4.
i.e. T f T cε c σ. T c
4 T w4.
.....(13.79)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 86
where Ac = surface area of thermometer bulb, εc = emissivity of thermometer bulb surface
• Eqn. (13.79) gives the true temperature of the fluid Tf.• Second term on the RHS of eqn. (13.79) represents the
error in temperature measurement due to radiation effect
i.e. T f T c h.....(13.79)
• Radiation error can be minimized by:• (i) having low value of εc i.e. high reflectivity for the
bulb surface• (ii) high value for h, the convective heat transfer
coefficient• In practice, even if we start with a thermometer bulb
surface of high reflectivity, soon the emissivity value rises to about 0.8 or 0.9 due to deposit formation,
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 87
rises to about 0.8 or 0.9 due to deposit formation, corrosion or erosion of the bulb surface, etc.
• So, the most practical way to reduce the radiation errorin temperature measurement is to provide a cylindrical radiation shield around the thermometer bulb, as shown in Fig. (13.39,b) above.
• In steady state, the shield temperature (Ts) will stabilize somewhere in between the fluid temperature Tf and the wall temperature Tw.
• Then, in eqn. (13.79), Tw will be replaced by the effective shield temperature Ts.
• Energy balance on the thermometer bulb:• Heat transferred to the bulb from the fluid by convection =
Heat transferred from the bulb to the shield by radiation
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 88
Heat transferred from the bulb to the shield by radiation
• In eqn. (13.80), Fcs = view factor of thermometer bulb w.r.t the shield and is, generally equal to 1.
i.e. h A c. T f T c
.σ T c
4 T s4.
1 ε c
A c ε c.
1
A c F cs.
1 ε s
A s ε s.
....(13.80)
• Making an energy balance on the shield:heat transferred to shield from the fluid by convection + heat transferred to shield from bulb by radiation = heat transferred from shield to walls by radiation
i.e. 2 A s. h. T f T s
.σ T c
4 T s4.
1 ε c
A c ε c.
1
A c F cs.
1 ε s
A s ε s.
ε s A s. σ. T s
4 T w4. ....(13.81)
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 89
where, A s = area of shield on one side
ε s = emissivitty of shield surface
A c = area of bulb surface
ε c = emissivity of bulb surface
F cs = view factor of bulb w.r.t. shield
• In the first term of the above eqn. factor 2 appears since convective heat transfer to the shield occurs on both surfaces of the shield.
• Also, in writing the RHS, the inherent assumption is that:
F sw 1 ...view factor between the shield and the walls
and,
Aug. 2016 MT/SJEC/M.Tech. 90
• Solving eqns. (13.80) and (13.81) simultaneously, we obtain the shield temperature Ts and the thermometer reading Tc, (if Tf is known), or Tf (if Tc is known).
A s
A w0 ...i.e. surface area of shield is negligible compared to the area of the channel
walls
Aug. 2016 91MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 92MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 93MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 94MT/SJEC/M.Tech.
Aug. 2016 95MT/SJEC/M.Tech.