Thermal and Mechanical Hazards of Nitrocellulose and its ...
Transcript of Thermal and Mechanical Hazards of Nitrocellulose and its ...
Thermal and Mechanical Hazards of Nitrocellulose and its Mixture with Nitroglycerin
S. Singh1, Q. Kwok1, R. Turcotte1 and M. Paquet2
1Canadian Explosives Research Laboratory, Natural Resources Canada 2General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems - Canada Valleyfield
7th International Nitrocellulose Symposium, Montréal, Canada, May 31 – June 1, 2016
Outline Introduction
Thermal Study • Accelerating Rate Calorimetry (ARC)
Quantification of Mechanical Hazards • Friction • Impact
Summary
Acknowledgement: Special thanks to Mr. Ian Levac from GD-OTS Canada Valleyfield for the preparation and the shipping of the samples used in this work
Introduction All modes of ignition of energetic materials are essentially thermal in nature:
Fast (millisecond) ignitions are intuitively familiar:
• Striking a match • Lighting a gas BBQ • Using paper (kindling) to start a fire
Slow ignition events (days, years) are less intuitive:
• Most energetic materials are self-heating materials and therefore can be made to spontaneously ignite
Mechanical ignition hazards
• instantaneous friction and/or impact stimuli invoking an unintended reaction (evolution of gas, sound, light…)
Introduction Literature isothermal studies attempt prediction of safe storage periods for NC and NC/NG systems
• Slow ignition (T. Kotoyori 2005):
Autocatalytic induction times from 1 to 10 days (Tiso : 73 to 91°C) • Fast ignition (A.S. Shteinberg 2006): Ignition times from 1 to 15 seconds (Tiso : 212 to 242°C)
Mechanical sensitivity testing addresses probability of initiation (Ip)
• Ip = probability of local ignition • Proper test to simulate process events (hazards) • Unbiased scheme to assign “yes/no” reaction to test • Appropriate statistical analysis method • Is there an acceptable level of risk?
NC Grade N Content (mass %)
C; Type I 13.15 ± 0.05 %
“as rec’d” 25% water-wet Dried in desiccator to constant
mass. Stored and used from desiccator for duration of study
NC/NG (70/30) Prep: GD–OTS Canada Valleyfield NC wetted with alcohol/acetone Acetone desensitized NG added Mixed to a granular paste with suitable viscosity Transferred onto stainless steel plate and left
>48 h to evaporate at room temperature to a given residual solvent Material peeled off and broken into small pieces
“as rec’d” dried
under vacuum Stored in sealed
charge dissipative vials
Samples
Thermal Study - ARC
10 mL spherical Ti vessel
1 mL tube Ti vessel
ARC (Isothermal)
Induction time ()/h0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
T iso/°
C
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
= 19.8 h
= 9.5 h
= 4.8 h
= 2.4 h
= 1.9 h
= 0.5 h
= 152.2 h
= 36.4 h
Tiso/°C
= 29.3 h
65
75808595105110115
70
Induction time ()/h0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
T iso/°
C
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
= 37.2 h
= 21.4 h
= 12.7 h
= 10.0 h
= 7.4 h = 4.6 h
= 2.3 h = 1.5 h = 0.9 h
Tiso/°C
35 45 55 6579
80
84
86
= 53.5 h
80859095100105110115120125
NC NC/NG (70/30)
103 K/T2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0
ln (
/min
)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
NC/NG 70/30 NC alone (grade C)
Ea = 105 ± 5 kJ mol-1
ln(A/min-1) = 27.4 ± 1.5r2 = 0.976
Ea = 95 ± 11 kJ mol-1
ln(A/min-1) = 25 ± 4r2 = 0.898
ARC (Isothermal)
Literature + Isothermal ARC Data
Induction/ignition time/min10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105
Isot
herm
al T
empe
ratu
re/°C
50
100
150
200
250
Thermal Study - Conclusions Empirical fit can be used as a basis to derive NC shelf-
lives from iterative calculations • More data would be required at lower temperatures
(micro-calorimetry) to improve shelf-life predictions • More data would be required to link the fast ignition data
to the slow decomposition regime (10 s to 30 min) • Therefore in the present work, attempts will be made to
develop a pyrolysis technique to obtain such data
The slow decomposition behaviour of the NC/NG mixture and pure NC appears very similar
The NC/NG mixture shows similar induction at temperatures ≈10°C lower than pure NC
v
W Porcelain peg
Sample Porcelain plate
BAM Friction Test
Mechanical Hazard: Friction ABL/ICI
Friction Test
Stainless Steel Plate Sample Deposit
Fixed Stainless Steel Disc
W
v
Pendulum Arm
Heavy Weight
ABL/ICI Hazards quantification via statistical data treatment of measured parameters such as contact geometry, applied pressure, plate velocity, detection of induced reactions (i.e., monitor emissions)… Correlation study on many parameters has shown that D = Pa l <v>2 gives the best overall correlation for a wide range of EMs [Pa = Apparent Pressure, l = Contact Length (in the direction of motion), <v> = Average Relative Velocity]
Main power switch
Photodiode amplifier
Pendulum
CO analyzer
Apparatus Start/Stop
NOx analyzer
PS2 Sliding platform
Friction (ABL/ICI)
Load Pressure monitor
<R>
CO
/ n
L m
m-1
0
500
1000
1500
2000
CO Threshold274 nL mm-1
NOx Threshold1.39 nL mm-1
<D = P l v2> W s-1
106 107
<R>
NO
x /
nL m
m-1
0
2
4
6
8
Dose Threshold4.17 x 106 W s-1
Dose Threshold3.85 x 106 W s-1
Friction: Gas evolution
<R>
CO
/ n
L m
m-1
0
500
1000
1500
2000
CO Threshold459 nL mm-1
NOx Threshold3.44 nL mm-1
<D = P l v2> W s-1106 107
<R>
NO
x /
nL m
m-1
0
2
4
6
8
10
Dose Threshold4.55 x 106 W s-1
Dose Threshold4.63 x 106 W s-1
NC/NG (70/30)
NC
Hazards Quantification - Friction
<D>/W s-1
105 106 107 108
Prob
abili
ty o
f ign
ition
/%
0.001
0.01
0.050.10.2
0.512
5
10
20
30
50
70
80
90
95
9899
CONOx
Regression
<D>/W s-1105 106 107 108
Prob
abili
ty o
f ign
ition
/%
0.001
0.01
0.050.10.20.5
12
5
10
2030
50
7080
90
95
9899
CONOx
Regression
NC/NG (70/30)
NC
Hazards Quantification - Impact
PMax / GPa10-2 10-1 100 101 102
Pro
babi
lity
of I
gniti
on /
%
0.01
0.050.10.20.5
12
5
10
2030
50
7080
90
95
9899
PMax / GPa10-2 10-1 100 101 102
Pro
babi
lity
of I
gniti
on /
%
0.01
0.050.10.20.5
12
5
10
2030
50
7080
90
95
9899
NC
NC/NG 70/30
Hazards Quantification - Impact
Energy Density / J m-2
102 103 104 105 106 107
Pro
babi
lity
of I
gniti
on /
%
0.01
0.050.10.20.5
12
5
10
2030
50
7080
90
95
9899
Energy Density / J m-2
102 103 104 105 106 107
Pro
babi
lity
of I
gniti
on /
%
0.01
0.050.10.20.5
12
5
10
2030
50
7080
90
95
9899
NC
NC/NG70/30
Mechanical Hazards-Conclusions Small scale friction and impact tests can be instrumented and
calibrated to obtain realistic evaluation of Ip for NC and NC/NG • Friction
• Compared to NC, the NC/NG mixture has lower thresholds of CO/NOx production, corresponding to the onset of combustion reactions with a potential to propagate
• Pal<v>2 dose parameter is “unphysical” . [Ignition of the NC and NC/NG in this test is expected to be thermal in origin so “friction temperature” a better dose parameter]
• Impact • Compared to NC, the NC/NG mixture demonstrates higher
probability to initiate given the same dose
What is an acceptable level of risk? These Ip data are useful for insertion into risk assessment models.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2016