Theory and Literary Analysis C

download Theory and Literary Analysis C

of 8

Transcript of Theory and Literary Analysis C

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    1/19

    UNIVERSITY OF BUENOS AIRES

    FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE

    DEPARTMENT: LETTERS

    SUBJECT: Theory and Literary Analysis C

    TEACHERS: Jorge Panesi

    SEMESTER First

    YEAR: 2015

    2554: No. PROGRAM

    University of Buenos Aires

    Faculty of Philosophy and Literature

    Department of Arts

    First quarter 2015

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    2/19

    Literary Theory and Analysis

    Chair "C"

    Professor: Jorge Panesi

    Literary criticism and readings

    A. Contents of the program

    1. Vanguards, concepts of literary theory and practice formalist criticism. a) The formalism and its

    relations with the Russian futurism, Marxism and the German aesthetic trends. The notions coined

    by V. Shklovsky. Bates with the academic establishment and cultural relations with state

    institutions from polemics with Marxism: B. Eikhenbaum, L. Trotsky, B. Arvatov. b) The critical

    theoretical heritage and symbolism. The vicissitudes of the opposition "poetic language / practice

    language". Critical practice of the formalists. c) The question of literary history. d) Tinianov-

    Eikhenbaum: reformulation of formalist principles. e) School Bakhtin, his conception of language

    and literature; criticism of the formalism: V. Voloshinov, P. Medvedev. Dostoevsky criticism of

    Bakhtin. f) Stalinism, the official theory of art and the dissolution of the OPOIAZ.

    2. The School of Prague: continuity and distances formalism: the creation of a semiotics of art and

    literature. The role of the vanguard in the conceptions of Czech structuralism. Linguistic,

    sociological and philosophical basis in critical theory and practice Jan Mukařovský. His theory of

    reading, the limits of semiotics and critical scope of the notion of "semantic gesture". The subject

    in reading. The "personality of the artist." Leads in the "aesthetics of reception".

    3. The literary autonomy readings and discussions. Readings from literary autonomy. Theories of

    art. The thesis of Peter Bürger. Theodor W. Adorno as a literary critic. The concept of "autonomy"

    in the discussion between Adorno and Walter Benjamin. The role of "cultural industry."Mediations. Lukacs, art critic. The realism in the critical discourse of Lukacs and Bertolt Brecht. The

    concept of reading W. Benjamin. Literary criticism as Benjamin. Critical approaches to Franz Kafka.

    4. The impact structuralist critical discourse. Critic Roland Barthes literature of his time. From the

    theory of the "death of the author" to the kingdom of the reader and the text. M. Blanchot and

    Michel Foucault in the critical discourse of structuralists years. Foucault and literary critic

    5. Critical Discourses of multiplicity and difference. Jacques Derrida: A philosophical reading of the

    literature and literary institutions. Deconstruction as reading of literary texts. Structuralist

    deconstruction of discourse. The subject and the theory of the firm. Literary criticism as

    "countersignature". Literature, democracy and law. Gilles Deleuze: literature and life. Kafka intheoretical constructions of Derrida and Deleuze contrasts.

    6. Poetry criticism and theory. Poetry and formal specificity. The rhythm of the poem as a

    constructive principle. Imaginary rhythm and semantics. Rhythm: detail, Demonstration and white

    or silence. Translation as evidence of the way. Tinianov and Benjamin. Poetry and subjectivity

    body, culture, gender. Kristeva and Derrida. Poetry and market. Deleuze. Read on translating the

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    3/19

    specificity of the poetic form: Emily Dickinson, Sylvia Plath, Dylan. Selection of Argentine poets

    Girondo Storni, Pizarnik, Thénon Ortiz.

    B. Foundations Program

    Propose a course to literary studies focused on two centers: on the one hand, the discourse of

    criticism, and on the other, the correlative production of "readings" (on texts, institutional frames,

    literary movements, various genres, etc. .) involving specific actions and operations. As some have

    noted (Derrida, Foucault), the discourse of criticism, but mostly produced under institutions, also

    permeates other fields often these readings are indistinguishable: literary and theoretical texts

    with which it has close relations. It will try to show students that the three discourses involved in

    our practice (literary discourse, critical and theoretical), keep each other relationships that

    become evident when they are studied historically. The proximity or remoteness from the

    literature and hegemony to which they have aspired speeches "seconds" (criticism, literary theory)

    are present with large variability that must distinguish each of the topics of the program.

    If the relationships these three speeches together form the field of literary studies, and produces a

    relatively specific knowledge, are no less important for constitution established connections with

    other disciplines, speeches and knowledge. With different nuances in different contexts,

    philosophy, linguistics and sociology seem to have contributed the most influential exchanges, not

    always harmoniously and peacefully. Promote the ability to read in the problems studied these

    "internal" relations and "external" to our discipline, it is one of the purposes of this course.

    While the "readings" (in the terminology used today) refer to transactions primarily by the critics,

    and that would constitute something like its rationale, the other speeches also "would read"

    literature with ranges and effects that try to show students.

    The number and extent of these issues require a task of concentration and selection of problems

    to be studied:

    a) an essential aspect of what constitutes literary criticism, from its origins, the value judgment. It

    is important that students learn to recognize and address as objectively as possible this dimension

    of literary criticism and its related speeches. It is a fundamental dimension in the Marxist critique

    (eg Voloshinov), and also in the semiotic and sociological perspective Jan Mukařovský to develop(in addition to adding fundamental to the notion of "reading" used in this course elements);

    b) one of the persistent debates, both in criticism and literary theory, is maintained around the

    concept "author" whose construction we naturalized will have to criticize and put into perspective:

    this time we have chosen to work both in practice text commentary, as the theoretical acquisition,

    the work of Franz Kafka (and also correlate with it, that of Jorge Luis Borges) that serve to

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    4/19

    discriminate relevant aspects of criticism and theory during the twentieth and twenty-first century

    productively they occupied for their works;

    c) other contested concept that can be traced back to romanticism and Russian formalism is

    autonomy, which we also relativize and noted their role in the various streams addressed.

    We hope that this tour of critical discourse and the various problems selected around its historicdeployment, serve as an effective introduction to literary studies.

    C. Program Objectives and matter

    I. This program is articulated to review concepts from literary theory which comes into correlation

    with the theoretical debates arising in other speeches and disciplines. These notions -

    permanentemente redefined in literarios- studies constitute the broader conceptual framework

    that consistently appears in theoretical debates and in literary criticism. The program aims at a

    double objective:

    a) study the theoretical developments that the use of these concepts generated in the field of

    literature;

    b) enter the knowledge of the issues raised by these notions, his way of resolution and the

    discussions which led in each historical moment;

    II. As a corollary of the above objective, we analyze and discuss how these concepts are tools for

    literary criticism.

    III. Another objective is clear from our premise is to get students are able to think not only the

    basics targeted in the program, but also the different ways to read, analyze and reflect theliterature, implicit in critical practice.

    D. Aims of the subject:

    a) ensure that students get the skills needed to develop writing critical texts, from a

    systematization of literary analysis guidelines, together with a critical understanding of the

    theoretical paradigms that support this practice.

    b) incorporate the basic categories from which they can be articulated on both a reflection on the

    different aesthetic practices that make the object of specific theoretical problems as race.

    E. Planned activities

    The activities to be developed during the course to fulfill the objectives are:

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    5/19

    1) Discussion groups assumptions contained in the theoretical texts and analysis of argumentation

    schemes, implicit theoretical propositions, etc. It is expected that students acquire the necessary

    skills to disassemble the different theories studied.

    2) Analysis of texts with special detention in the constitutional procedures of each genre and

    theoretical paradigms that guide the readings.

    3) Reading and analysis of critical articles. Students must infer the theoretical framework in each

    case determines the argument, the paradigms on which the arguments are based, etc.

    4) Writing exercises that prepare students for solving different instances of assessment raised. It is

    intended that can handle various schemes and patterns argumentative writing.

    5) Exhibitions oral by students from the issues discussed in class.

    F. Criteria for the organization of groups

    The course work is divided into three activities for which three types of groups and classes are

    planned:

    1) The lectures (4 hours per week).

    2) The theoretical discussion workshops readings (theoretical and practical) with compulsory

    attendance, (2 hours per week) by Chiefs and Assistants Practical Works: in two groups and

    different schedules. Students may choose one of the groups, according to your time convenience.

    In class discussion workshop, analyzes and discusses the theoretical papers that are part of the

    compulsory bibliography of the program. Attendance at these courses involves the prior reading of

    theoretical texts that are indicated in each case, and oriented reflection based on reading anddiscussion guides to the chair previously be published.

    3) Practical sessions (two hours a week of class). The type of activities designed for the course

    involves the organization of small committees so that teachers can monitor student work and

    evaluate their activities in a personalized way.

    G. Total of teaching hours:

    Theory: 4 hours

    Discussion workshops: 2 hours

    Practical: 2 hours

    Total: 8 hours per week.

    H. SYSTEM OF PROMOTION:

    1. The promotion course will be final. Students must meet the following requirements:

    a) 75% attendance at the workshops theoretical discussion;

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    6/19

    b) 75% attendance at practical classes;

    c) approval of two works written with a practical average between the two least four points;

    d) approval of two exams with an average grade between the two no less than four points. The

    second part has the character of integration examination (the ability to integrate theoretical and

    practical elements developed throughout the course will be evaluated).

    3. Free Students: Final exam (written and oral) in accordance with existing regulations.

    I. Literary texts to be analyzed in the theoretical and practical:

    Literary texts of Franz Kafka, Jorge Luis Borges, Bertolt Brecht and those belonging to the poetry

    unit will be identified during the theoretical and practical classes.

    J.- Bibliography of required reading by the program units

    1.-

    Victor Shklovsky, "Art as artifice," Todorov, T., Theory of Literature of the Russian formalists, XXICentury.

    Eikhenbaum, Boris, "The theory of formal method" (ibid)

    Eikhenbaum, Boris, "How is made 'The Overcoat' Gogol" (ditto)

    Tinianov, "The poetic sense" in Problems of poetic language.

    Voloshinov, V., "The language in the life and language in poetry"

    Bakhtin, M., Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics (selection of the chair).

    Bakhtin, M., "The announcer on the novel" in Esthétique et théorie du roman.

    Bakhtin, M., "The problem of speech genres".

    Medvedev, P., The formal method in literary studies (selection)

    2.-

    Jan Mukařovský, "" Art as semiotic done. 

    Jan Mukařovský "function, standard and value as social facts." 

    Jan Mukařovský, "intentionality intentionality and no art."Jan Mukařovský ,, "The personality of the artist." 

    Jauss, HR, "The literary history and literary theory provocation"

    Gadamer, HG, Truth and Method (selection of the chair).

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    7/19

    3.-

    Burger, P., theory of art (selection), ed. Peninsula.

    Burger, P. "Modernization and literary institutionalization".

    Ludmer, J., "Literatures postautónomas".

    Huyssen, Andreas: "The modernist thumbnails: literary snapshots of urban spaces".

    Williams, Raymond: "When was Modernism?"

    Lukacs, G., "narrate or describe"

    Lukacs, G., "Kafka or Thomas Mann"

    Lukacs, G., "Realism: experience or bureaucratic socialist naturalism?"

    Lukács, G., "The ideological principles of modernism"

    Benjamin, W., "The Author as Producer"

    Benjamin, W., "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction".

    Benjamin, W., "On some issues in Baudelaire".

    Benjamin, W., "Franz Kafka. On the tenth anniversary of his death "(selected essays, The silver

    bowl).

    Adorno, T.W., "Notes on Kafka".

    Adorno, TW, Aesthetic Theory (selection of the chair)

    Adorno, TW, "The Artist as lieutenant" in Notes on literature.

    Adorno, TW, "Commitment" in Notes on literature.

    4.-

    Deleuze, G. "What structuralism recognized?"

    Barthes, Roland, S / Z.

    Barthes, Roland, "The death of the author".

    Barthes, Roland, "From the text book".

    Barthes, Roland, "The response from Kafka" Critical Essays.

    Barthes, Roland, The Pleasure of the Text.

    Foucault, Michel, "What is an author?".

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    8/19

    Foucault, Michel, "Language and Literature".

    Blanchot, Maurice, Kafka Kafka.

    5.-

    Derrida, J., "Signature, Event, Context" in Margins of Philosophy

    Derrida, J., "Before the law" in philosophy as an institution

    Derrida, J., "The law of genre" (translation of the chair).

    Derrida, J. "Passions" (translation of the chair).

    Deleuze, G, Guattari, F. Kafka, a minor literature.

    Deleuze, G., Rhizome, Ed. Pretextos, Barcelona.

    Deleuze, G.,: "Literature and Life".

    WARNING: The following bibliography is not mandatory consultation. Required texts are marked

    up and shall be corroborated or modified in the relevant guidelines for each topic, both in lectures,

    practical classes and workshops theoretical reading.

    It not intended to be exhaustive reference sources on the points made in the program. It is ,

    however, possible for a reference depth study.

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    9/19

     

    General literature program

    AA.VV., Constructivism, Madrid, Alberto Corazón, 1975.

    AA.VV., VV. AA. Realism. Myth, doctrine or historical trend? Buenos Aires, Lunaria, 2002.

    T. W. Adorno, Negative Dialectics. The jargon of authenticity (Complete Works, 6).

    TW Adorno, literature notes, Madrid, Akal, 2003 (Complete Works, 11).

    Adorno, T. and Horkheimer, M., Dialectic of Enlightenment, Buenos Aires, Sudamericana, 1987.

    Adorno, T., Aesthetic Theory, Madrid, Akal, 2004 (Complete Works, 7).

    Adorno, T., and Benjamin, W., Correspondence (1928-1940), Madrid, Trotta, 1998.

    Adorno, Theodor W. / Benjamin, Walter, Correspondence, 1928-1940, Madrid, Editorial Trotta,

    1998.

    Agamben, Giorgio, stays. The word and the ghost in Western culture, Valencia, Excuses, 1995.

    Agamben, Giorgio, Infancy and History, Buenos Aires, Adriana Hidalgo Editora,

    Agamben, Giorgio, potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy, Stanford, Stanford University

    Press, 1999.

    Agamben, Giorgio, desecration, Buenos Aires, Adriana Hidalgo, 2005.

    Albera, François (ed), The Russian formalists and film, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1996.

    Alway, Joan, Critical Theory and Political Posibilities: Conceptions of emancipatory Politics in the

    Works of Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse and Habermas, Greenwood Press, 1995.

    Amícola, Joseph-de Diego, Jose Luis (directors), today's literary theory. Concepts, approaches,

    debates, La Plata, issues aside, 2008.Amícola, Joseph, how to information. Bakhtin and Lotman in the debate with the Russian

    formalism, Rosario, Beatriz Viterbo, 1997.

    Arendt, Hanna, Man in Dark Times, New York, Harvest Book, 1993.

    Arvatov, Boris "poetic language and practical language (for a methodology of art studies" in

    Rassegna Soviet, No. 2, 1968, pp. 154-165 (translation of the Chair).

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    10/19

    Arvatov, Boris, art and production (program productivism), Madrid, A. Heart, 1973.

    Ashcroft, Hill-Griffiths, Gareth-Tiffin, Helen, The Empire Writes Back (Theory and Practice in Post-

    Colonial Literatures), London and New York, Routledge, 2002 (2nd. Ed.).

    Attridge, Derek (ed.) Acts of Literature / Jacques Derrida, New York and London: Routledge, 1992.

    Badiou, Alain, Manifeste pour la philosophie, Paris, Editions du Seuil, 1989 (translation Chair,

    Madrid)

    Bakhtin MM Aesthetics of verbal creation, Mexico, Siglo XXI, 1982.

    Bakhtin, MM, Popular culture in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (the context of François

    Rabelais), Barcelona, Barral Editores, 1978.

    Bakhtin, Mikhail (Pavel N. Medvedev), the formal method in literary studies, Madrid, Alianza

    Editorial, 1994.

    Bakhtin, Mikhail M., theory and aesthetics of the novel, Taurus, Mexico.

    Bakhtin, Mikhail, to a philosophy of ethical act (From drafts and other writings), Barcelona,

    Anthropos, 1997.

    Bakhtin, Mikhail [Bakhtin] The poétique Dostoevsky, Seuil, Paris, 1970 (translation: Economic

    Culture Fund).

    Balibar, Etienne: "Structuralism: A Destitution of the Subject?" In Differences. A Journal of Feminist

    Cultural Studies, 14: 1, 2003.

    Barbero, Jesus Martin, From media to mediations. Communication, culture and hegemony,

    Ediciones G. Gili, Mexico, 1991 [1987] (Chapter III, "Cultural Industry: capitalism and legitimation").

    Barthes, R. Le Degree Zero of l'écriture, Paris, Seuil, 1972 (no translation).

    Barthes, R., The Pleasure of the Text, Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI, 1993

    Barthes, R., The preparation of the novel, Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI, 2005.

    Barthes, R., Le bruissement de la langue, Paris, Seuil, 1984 (no translation, Editorial Polity Press).

    Barthes, R., The obvious and obtuse, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1984.

    Barthes, R., Oeuvres complètes, Paris, Seuil, 2002, (5 vol.), Edited by Eric Marty.

    Barthes, R., S / Z, Paris, Seuil, 1970 (no translation, Editorial Siglo XXI).

    Barthes, R., Variations on literature, Buenos Aires, Polity Press, 2003.

    Barthes, Roland, Racine, Mexico, Siglo XXI, 1992.

    Benjamin, Walter "On some issues in Baudelaire" Angelus Novus, Barcelona, Edhasa, 1971.

    Benjamin, Walter, The Concept of Art Criticism in German Romanticism Barcelona, Peninsula,

    1988.

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    11/19

    Benjamin, Walter, "The Storyteller," in On the program of the future philosophy, Barcelona,

    Planet, 1986.

    Benjamin, Walter, "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction," in Speeches

    interrupted I, Madrid, Taurus, 1973.

    Benjamin, Walter, "Short History of Photography", Ibid.

    Benjamin, Walter, book tickets, Madrid, Akal, 2005.

    Benjamin, Walter, The Origin of German Tragic Drama, Madrid, Taurus, 1990.

    Benjamin, Walter, Attempts on Brecht (Illuminations III), Madrid, Taurus, 1998.

    Benjamin, Walter, chosen trials, Buenos Aires, Silver Bowl, 2010

    Bennet, Andrew, The Author, New York, Routledge, 2005.

    Biriotti, M. Miller, N. (eds) What is an author ?, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1993.

    Bolivar Echeverria (ed.) The look of the angel. Around the thesis on the history of WalterBenjamin. UNAM / ERA, Mexico, 2005.

    Blanchot, Maurice, Kafka Kafka, Mexico, Bottom of Economic, Culture 1991.

    Blanchot, Maurice, The literary space, Madrid, National Publisher, 2002.

    Bottomore, Tom, The Frankfurt School and Its Critics, London, Routledge, 2002 ..

    Boyne, Roy, Foucault and Derrida (The other side of reason), London, Unhin Hyman, 1990.

    Bronckart, Jean-Paul-Boot, Christian, Bakhtine Démasqué. Histoire d'un menteur, d'une et d'un

    collectif escroquerie délire, Geneva, Librairie Droz, 2011.

    Buck-Morss, Dialectic look. Walter Benjamin and the Arcades Project, Madrid, Editorial Visor,

    1995.

    Buck-Morss, Origin of Negative Dialectics, Bs. As., Eternal Cadence, 2011 [1st. ed. 1977].

    Buck-Morss, Walter Benjamin, revolutionary writer, Buenos Aires, Interzone Editora, 2005.

    Bürger, Peter, Critique of idealistic aesthetics, Madrid, Viewfinder Books, 1996.

    Bürger, Peter, art theory, Madrid, Peninsula, 1987.

    Bürger, Peter, The Decline of Modernism, Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania State University Press,

    1992.

    Burke, Sean, The Death and the Return of the Author. Criticism and Subjectivity in Barthes,

    Foucault and Derrida, Edinburg, Edinburg University Press, 1998.

    Butler, Judith-Guillory, John Kendall, Thomas (eds), What's Left of Theory, New York, Routledge,

    2000.

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    12/19

    Butler, Judith, "Subjection, Resistance, Resignification: Between Freud and Foucault", in: John

    Rajchman (editor), The identity in Question, London and New York, Routledge, 1995.

    Butler, Judith, "The Body Politics of Julia Kristeva" in Hypatia, vol 3, no. 3, Winter 1989, pp. 104-

    118.

    Caputo, John-Yount, Mark (ed.) Foucault and the Critique of Institutions, Pennsylvania, ThePennsylvania State University Press, 1993.

    Caputo, John, The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida. Religion without Religion, Bloomington

    and Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, 1997.

    Christina Kiaer, "Boris Arvatov's Socialist Objects", on October 81.

    Clark, Caterina Holquist, Michael, Mikhail Bakhtin, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1984.

    Coates, Ruth, in Bakhtin Christianity: God and the Exiled Author, Cambridge, Cambridge University

    Press, 1998.

    Compagnon, Antoine, Le démon of théorie. Literature et sens commun, Paris, Seuil, 1998.

    Congdon, Lee, The Young Lukacs, Chapel Hill and London, The University of North Carolina Press,

    1983.

    Conio, Gerard, Le constructivisme russe, Paris, Lausanne, L'Age d'Homme, 1987 (2 vol.)

    Corridor, Eva L. Lukacs after Communism: Interviews with Contemporary Intellectuals, Duke

    University Press, 1997.

    Culler, Jonathan, On deconstruction, Madrid, Chair, 1984 ..

    Cusset, François, French Theory, Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze & Cia. and mutations of intellectual life

    in the United States, Barcelona, Editorial Melusina, 2005.

    Depretto-Genty, Catherine, "Introduction" to Tynianov, I., et Histoire Littéraire formalism,

    Lausanne, Editions L'Age d'Homme, 1991. (translation of the chair)

    Derrida, J. and Geoffrey Bennington, Jacques Derrida, Paris, Seuil, 1991.

    Derrida, J. and Labarrière, Pierre-Jean, Altérités, Paris, Osiris, 1986.

    Derrida, J., "How not to talk" and other texts, Valencia, Athropos, 1989.

    Derrida, J., Glas, Paris, Galilée, 1974.

    Derrida, J., La vérité en peinture, Paris, Flammarion, 1978 (translation: edit Polity Press.)

    Derrida, J., Marges de la Philosophie, Paris, Minuit, 1972 (translation: Edit Chair.)

    Derrida, J., Signéponge, Paris, Seuil, 1988.

    Derrida, Jacques-Roudinesco, Elisabeth, and morning ..., Buenos Aires, Fondo de Cultura

    Economica, 2003.

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    13/19

    Derrida, Jacques, L'ecriture et la difference, Seuil, Paris, 1967 (translation: Edit Anthropos.).

    Derrida, Jacques, Dissemination, Madrid, Foundations, 1975.

    Derrida, Jacques, "What is poetry?" Er, Journal of Philosophy, year VI, n 248, 89 winter / summer

    90, pp.165-170.

    Derrida, Jacques, "Submission" in Deconstruction on the borders of philosophy, Cambridge, Polity

    Press, 1989.

    Derrida, Jacques, each time only, the end of the world, Valencia, Excuses, 2005.

    Derrida, Jacques, another monolingualism, Buenos Aires, Editorial Manantial, 1997.

    Derrida, Jacques, Dissemination, Madrid, Foundations, 1975.

    Derrida, Jacques, The postcard (From Freud to Lacan and beyond), Mexico, Siglo XXI, 1986 (

    Derrida, Jacques, Limited Inc., Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press, 1988.

    Derrida, Jacques, Passions, Paris, Galilée, 1993 ("Passions", translation professorship atwww.jacquesderrida.com.ar).

    Derrida, Jacques, Politics of Friendship, Madrid, Editorial Trotta, 1998.

    Dosse, François, Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari. Cross biography, Buenos Aires, FCE., 2009.

    Dosse, François, History of structuralism, Madrid, Akal, 2004 (2 vol.).

    Dreyfus, R.-Rabinow, P., Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Buenos Aires,

    New Vision. 2001.

    During, Simon, Foucault and Literature. Towards a genealogy of writing, New York and London:

    Routledge, 1992.

    Eagleton, Terry, After Theory, Barcelona, Debate, 2005.

    Eagleton, Terry, Literary Theory: An Introduction, London, Basil Blackwell, 1983 (no translation:

    Economic Culture Fund).

    Eagleton, Terry, Walter Benjamin. Or Towards a Revolutionary Criticism, London, Verso Editions,

    1981 (translation Chair, Madrid).

    Emerson, Caryl, "Keeping the Self Intact During the Culture Wars: A Centennial Essay for Mikhail

    Bakhtin," New Literary History, vol 27, no. 1, 1996, pp. 107-126.

    Entel, Alicia-Lenarduzzi, Victor-Gerzovich, Diego School of Frankfurt. Reason, art and freedom,

    Buenos Aires, Eudeba, 2005 [1999].

    Eribon, Didier, Michel Foucault and his contemporaries, Buenos Aires, New Vision, 1995.

    Erlich, Victor, Russian formalism, Seix Barral, Barcelona, 1974.

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    14/19

    Feher Ferenc, "Lukacs and Benjamin: Parallels and Contrasts" New German Critique, No. 34

    (Winter 1985), pp. 125-138.

    Ferrario, Edoardo, Theory della letteratura in Russia (1900-1934), Rome, Editori Reuniti, 1977.

    Fish, Stanley, Is There a Text In This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities, Harvard

    University Press, 1980.

    Fitzpatrick, Sheila (ed.), Cultural Revolution in Russia, from 1928 to 1931, and London

    Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1978.

    Flynn, Thomas R. Sartre, Foucault, and Historical Reason. A poststructuralist Mapping of History,

    Vol. II, Chicago and London, University Of Chicago Press, 2005.

    Fokkema, Douwe, "Continuity and Change in Russian Formalism, Czech Structuralism, Soviet

    Semiotics" in PTL, 1, (1976).

    Foucault, Michel, what is an author? (Apostille Daniel Link), Buenos Aires, Silver Bowl, 2011.

    Foucault, Michel, "Nietzsche, genealogy, history" in microphysics of power, Madrid, Edic. The Axe,1979.

    Foucault, Michel, language arts, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1996.

    Foucault, Michel, Dit et écrits (1954-1988), Paris, Gallimard, 1994 (4 vol).

    Foucault, Michel, The order of discourse, Barcelona, Tusquets, 1980.

    Foucault, Michel, between philosophy and literature, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1999.

    Foucault, Michel, Aesthetics, ethics and hermeneutics, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1999.

    Foucault, Michel, Les mots et les choses, Paris, Gallimard, 1966 (no translation).

    Foucault, Michel, The Big ETRANGERE (A propos de littérature), Paris, Editions de l`École des

    Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 2013.

    Galan, František W. Historic structures. The school project in Prague (1928-1946), Mexico, Siglo

    XXI, 1988.

    Gasché, Rodolphe, The Tain of the Mirror (Derrida and the Philosophy of Reflection), Cambridge

    and London, Harvard University Press, 1986.

    Gonzalez Blanco, Lily, "Foucault and the theory of literature" in: Bulletin of the Center for the

    Study of Literary Theory and Criticism, National University of Rosario, No. 13-14 December. 2007-

    April 2008, pp. 126-137.

    Groden, Michael-Kreiswirth, Martin-Szeman, Imre (eds), The Johns Hopkin's Guide to Literary

    Theory and Criticism, Bloomington, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004, (2a. Ed.).

    Hahn, Susan, "Authenticity and impersonality in Adorno's Aesthetics", Telos, 117, Fall 1999

    Hamburger, kate, Logique des littéraires genres, Paris, Seuil, 1986 (orig. German, 1977).

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    15/19

    Hammermeister, Kai, The German Aesthetic Tradition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,

    2002.

    Harding, James M .: "Historical Dialectics and the Autonomy of Art in Adorno's Ästhetische

    Theorie", The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 50: 3, Summer 1992, pp. 184-195.

    Herman, Peter C. (editor), historicizing Theory, New York, State University of New York Press,2004.

    Hirschkop, Ken, Mikhail Bakhtin: An Aesthetic for Democracy, Oxford, Oxford University Press,

    1999.

    Hohendahl, Peter Uwe, Building a National Literature. The Case of Germany (1830-1870), Cornell

    Universiy Press, 1989.

    Hohendahl, Uwe Peter, Prismatic Thought: Theodor W. Adorno, Lincoln, NE. University of Nevada

    Press, 1995.

    Hohendahl, Peter Uwe, The Institution of Criticism, Ithaca and London, Cornell University Press,

    1982.

    Holland, Eugene, "Marx and poststructuralist Philosophies of Difference" The South Atlantic

    Quarterly, 96: 3, Summer 1997, pp. 526-541.

    Holquist, Michael, dialogism (Bakhtin and his World), London, Routledge, 2002 (2nd. Ed.)

    Huyssen, Andreas, After the great divide. Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism, Buenos

    Aires, Adriana Hidalgo, 2001.

    Huyssen, Andreas, Raiders of the Lost Future. Culture and memory in times of globalization,

    Mexico, Fondo de Cultura Economica, 2002.

    Ibarlucía, Ricardo, Onirokitsch. Walter Benjamin and surrealism, Buenos Aires, Spring, 1998.

    Ingram, David / Simon-Ingram, Julia (eds): Critical Theory: The Essential Reading, New York,

    Paragon House, 1992.

    ed.

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    16/19

     

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    17/19

     

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    18/19

     

  • 8/20/2019 Theory and Literary Analysis C

    19/19