Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

64
Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic How the world, with all its apparent complexity and diversity can be constructed out of a few elementary building blocks and their interactions Simplicity out of complexity – Macroscopic How the world of complex systems can display such remarkable regularity and simplicity

description

Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic How the world, with all its apparent complexity and diversity can be constructed out of a few elementary building blocks and their interactions Simplicity out of complexity – Macroscopic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Page 1: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Themes and challenges of Modern Science

•Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

How the world, with all its apparent complexity and diversity can be constructed out of a few elementary building blocks and their interactions

•Simplicity out of complexity – Macroscopic

How the world of complex systems can display such remarkable regularity and simplicity

Page 2: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic
Page 3: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

If we have more than one quadrupole phonon (boson) what total angular momenta do we have?

Use m-scheme for BOSONS (no Pauli Principle)

Page 4: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic
Page 5: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic
Page 6: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Deformed Nuclei• What is different about non-spherical nuclei?

• They can ROTATE !!!

• They can also vibrate– For axially symmetric deformed nuclei there are two low

lying vibrational modes called and

• So, levels of deformed nuclei consist of the ground state, and vibrational states, with rotational sequences of states (rotational bands) built on top of them.

Page 7: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

0+

2+

4+

6+

8+

E(I) ( ħ2/2I )J(J+1)

R4/2= 3.33

Rotational Motion in nuclei

Page 8: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

0+2+4+

6+

8+

Rotational states

Vibrational excitations

Rotational states built on (superposed on)

vibrational modes

Ground or equilibrium

state

Page 9: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Systematics and collectivity of the lowest vibrational

modes in deformed nuclei

Notice the smooth systematics and low

energies for the mode near mid-shell,

compared with the erratic behavior and

higher energies of the mode. This points to

lower collectivity of the vibration.

Page 10: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic
Page 11: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

IBA – A Review and Practical Tutorial

Drastic simplification of

shell model

Valence nucleons

Only certain configurations Simple Hamiltonian – interactions

“Boson” model because it treats nucleons in pairs

2 fermions boson

F. Iachello and A. Arima

Page 12: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Shell Model Configurations

Fermion configurations

Boson configurations

(by considering only configurations of pairs of fermions

with J = 0 or 2.)

The IBA

Roughly, gazillions !!Need to simplify

Page 13: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Modeling a NucleusModeling a Nucleus

154Sm 3 x 1014 2+ states

Why the IBA is the best thing since jackets

Shell model

Need to truncate

IBA assumptions1. Only valence nucleons2. Fermions → bosons

J = 0 (s bosons)

J = 2 (d bosons)

IBA: 26 2+ states

Is it conceivable that these 26 basis states are correctly chosen to account for the

properties of the low lying collective

states?

Page 14: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Why s, d bosons?

  Lowest state of all e-e First excited state

in non-magic s nuclei is 0+ d e-e nuclei almost always 2+

- fct gives 0+ ground state - fct gives 2+ next above 0+

Page 15: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Why the IBA ?????• Why a model with such a drastic simplification ???

• Answer: Because it works !!!!!• By far the most successful general nuclear collective

model for nuclei ever developed. Wide variety of collective structures.

• Extremely parameter-economic

Deep relation with Group Theory !!! Dynamical symmetries, group chains, quantum numbers

Page 16: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic
Page 17: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Dynamical Symmetries

• Shell Model - (Microscopic)

• Geometric – (Macroscopic)

• Third approach — “Algebraic”

Phonon-like model with microscopic basis explicit from the start.

Group Theoretical

Sph.Def.

Shell Mod. Geom. Mod.

IBA

Collectivity

Mic

rosc

opic

Page 18: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

IBA ModelsIBA Models

IBA – 1 No distinction of p, n

IBA – 2 Explicitly write p, n parts

IBA – 3, 4 Take isospin into account p-n pairs

IBFM Int. Bos. Fermion Model for Odd A nuclei

H = He – e(core) + Hs.p. + Hint

IBFFM Odd – odd nuclei

[ (f, p) bosons for = - states ]

Parameters !!!: IBA-1: ~2 Others: 4 to ~ 20 !!!

Page 19: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

• F. Iachello and A. Arima, The Interacting Boson Model (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1987).

• F. Iachello and P. Van Isacker, The Interacting Boson-Fermion Model (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2005)

• R.F. Casten and D.D. Warner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60 (1988) 389.

• R.F. Casten, Nuclear Structure from a Simple Perspective, 2nd Edition (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK, 2000), Chapter 6 (the basis for most of these lectures).

• D. Bonatsos, Interacting boson models of nuclear structure, (Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1989)

• Many articles in the literature

Background, ReferencesBackground, References

Page 20: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Note key point:Note key point:

Bosons in IBA are pairs of fermions in valence shell

Number of bosons for a given nucleus is a fixed number

1549262 Sm

N = 6 5 = N NB =

11

Page 21: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Me et al.

Page 22: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

An early conference on the IBA(Featuring young Alison)

Page 23: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Review of phonon creation and destruction operatorsReview of phonon creation and destruction operators

is a b-phonon number operator.

For the IBA a boson is the same as a phonon – think of it as a collective excitation with ang. mom. zero (s) or 2 (d).

What is a creation operator? Why useful?

A) Bookkeeping – makes calculations very simple.

B) “Ignorance operator”: We don’t know the structure of a phonon but, for many predictions, we don’t need to know its microscopic basis.

Page 24: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Brief, simple, trip into the Group Theory of the IBA

DON’T BE SCARED

You do not need to understand all the details but try to get the idea of the

relation of groups to degeneracies of levels and quantum numbers

A more intuitive (we will see soon) name for this application of Group Theory is

“Spectrum Generating Algebras”

Page 25: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

To understand the relation, consider operators that create, destroy s and d bosons

s†, s, d†, d operators Ang. Mom. 2

d† , d = 2, 1, 0, -1, -2

Hamiltonian is written in terms of s, d operators

Since boson number is conserved for a given nucleus, H can only contain “bilinear” terms: 36 of them.

s†s, s†d, d†s, d†d

Gr. Theor. classification

of Hamiltonian

IBAIBA has a deep relation to Group theory

Note on ” ~ “ ‘s: I often forget them

Page 26: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Concepts of group theory First, some fancy words with simple meanings: Generators, Casimirs, Representations, conserved quantum numbers, degeneracy splitting

Generators of a group: Set of operators , Oi that close on commutation. [ Oi , Oj ] = Oi Oj - Oj Oi = Ok i.e., their commutator gives back 0 or a member of the set

For IBA, the 36 operators s†s, d†s, s†d, d†d are generators of the group U(6).

Generators: define and conserve some quantum number.

Ex.: 36 Ops of IBA all conserve total boson number = ns + nd N = s†s + d† d

Casimir: Operator that commutes with all the generators of a group. Therefore, its eigenstates have a specific value of the q.# of that group. The energies are defined solely in terms of that q. #. N is Casimir of U(6).

Representations of a group: The set of degenerate states with that value of the q. #.

A Hamiltonian written solely in terms of Casimirs can be solved analytically

ex: † † † † † †, d s d sd s s s n n d ss s s sd s n n

† † †

† †

1 1, 1

1 1 1, 1

1 1, 1

s d s d s

s d s

s d s d s

d s s s d s

d s d s

d s

d sn n n s sd s n n

n s s d s n n

n s s n n n n

n n n n n n

n n n n

d s n n

or: † † †,d s s s d s

e.g: † † †

† †

,N s d N s d s dN

Ns d s dN

† † 0Ns d Ns d

Page 27: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Sub-groups:

Subsets of generators that commute among themselves.

e.g: d†d 25 generators—span U(5)

They conserve nd (# d bosons)

Set of states with same nd are the representations of the group [ U(5)]

Summary to here:

Generators: commute, define a q. #, conserve that q. #

Casimir Ops: commute with a set of generators

Conserve that quantum #

A Hamiltonian that can be written in terms of Casimir Operators is then diagonal for states with that quantum #

Eigenvalues can then be written ANALYTICALLY as a function of that quantum #

Page 28: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Simple example of dynamical symmetries, group chain, degeneracies

[H, J 2 ] = [H, J Z ] = 0 J, M constants of motion

Page 29: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Let’s illustrate group chains and degeneracy-breaking.

Consider a Hamiltonian that is a function ONLY of: s†s + d†d

That is: H = a(s†s + d†d) = a (ns + nd ) = aN

In H, the energies depend ONLY on the total number of bosons, that is, on the total number of valence nucleons.

ALL the states with a given N are degenerate. That is, since a given nucleus has a given number of bosons, if H were the total Hamiltonian, then all the levels of the nucleus would be degenerate. This is not very realistic (!!!) and suggests that we

should add more terms to the Hamiltonian. I use this example though to illustrate the idea of successive steps of degeneracy breaking being related to different groups

and the quantum numbers they conserve.

The states with given N are a “representation” of the group U(6) with the quantum number N. U(6) has OTHER representations, corresponding to OTHER values of N,

but THOSE states are in DIFFERENT NUCLEI (numbers of valence nucleons).

Page 30: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

H’ = H + b d†d = aN + b nd

Now, add a term to this Hamiltonian:

Now the energies depend not only on N but also on nd

States of a given nd are now degenerate. They are “representations” of the group U(5). States with

different nd are not degenerate

Page 31: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

N

N + 1

N + 2

nd

1 2

0

a

2a

E

0 0

b

2b

H’ = aN + b d†d = a N + b nd

U(6) U(5)

H’ = aN + b d†d

Etc. with further term

s

Page 32: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Concept of a Dynamical Symmetry

N

OK, here’s the key point -- get this if nothing else:

Spectrum generating algebra !!

Page 33: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

OK, here’s what you need to remember from the Group Theory

• Group Chain: U(6) U(5) O(5) O(3)

• A dynamical symmetry corresponds to a certain structure/shape of a nucleus and its characteristic excitations. The IBA has three dynamical symmetries: U(5), SU(3), and O(6).

• Each term in a group chain representing a dynamical symmetry gives the next level of degeneracy breaking.

• Each term introduces a new quantum number that describes what is different about the levels.

• These quantum numbers then appear in the expression for the energies, in selection rules for transitions, and in the magnitudes of transition rates.

Page 34: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Group Structure of the IBAGroup Structure of the IBA

s boson :

d boson :

U(5)vibrator

SU(3)rotor

O(6)γ-soft

1

5U(6)

Sph.

Def.

Magical group

theory stuff

happens here

Symmetry Triangle of

the IBA

(everything we do from here

on will be discussed in the

context of this triangle. Stop

me now if you do not

understand up to here)

Page 35: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Most general IBA Hamiltonian in terms with up to four boson operators (given N)

IBA Hamiltonian

Mixes d and s components of the wave functions

d+

d

Counts the number of d bosons out of N bosons, total. The

rest are s-bosons: with Es = 0 since we deal only with

excitation energies.

Excitation energies depend ONLY on the number of d-bosons.

E(0) = 0, E(1) = ε , E(2) = 2 ε.

Conserves the number of d bosons. Gives terms in the

Hamiltonian where the energies of configurations of 2 d bosons

depend on their total combined angular momentum. Allows for

anharmonicities in the phonon multiplets.d

Page 36: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

U(5)

Spherical, vibrational nuclei

Page 37: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

What J’s? M-scheme

Look familiar? Same as quadrupole vibrator.

6+, 4+, 3+, 2+, 0+

4+, 2+, 0+

2+

0+

3

2

1

0

nd

Simplest Possible IBA Hamiltonian – given by energies of the bosons with NO interactions

† †

d d s s

d s

H n n

d d s s

Excitation energies so, set s = 0, and drop subscript d on d

dH n

What is spectrum? Equally spaced levels defined by number of d bosons

= E of d bosons + E of s bosons

Page 38: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

E (nd, , J) = α nd + β nd (nd + 4) + 2γ ( +4)

+ 2δJ (J + 1)

Degeneracy breaking of multiplets [Cj terms]

But Ψ’s remain unchanged since H [ U(5)]) cannot change (mix) nd

But, U(5) is a rich symmetry that allows anharmonicities

Harmonic U(5): β, γ, δ = 0; E ~ nd

U(5) U(5)

Page 39: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

EE2 Transitions in the IBA2 Transitions in the IBAKey to most tests

Very sensitive to structure

E2 Operator: Creates or destroys an s or d boson or recouples two d bosons. Must conserve N

T = e Q = e[s† + d†s + χ (d† )(2)]d d

Specifies relative strength of this term

Page 40: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

E2 transitions in U(5)

• χ = 0 so

• T = e[s† + d†s]

• Can create or destroy a single d boson, that is a single phonon.

d

6+, 4+, 3+, 2+, 0+

4+, 2+, 0+

2+

0+

3

2

1

0

nd

Page 41: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

0+

2+

6+. . .

8+. . .

Vibrator (H.O.)

E(I) = n ( 0 )

R4/2= 2.0

Vibrator

Page 42: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

IBA HamiltonianComplicated and not

really necessary to use all these terms and all

6 parameters

Simpler form with just two parameters – RE-GROUP TERMS ABOVE

H = ε nd - Q Q Q = e[s† + d†s + χ (d† )(2)]d d

Competition: ε nd term gives vibrator.

Q Q term gives deformed nuclei.

Page 43: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Relation of IBA Hamiltonian to Group Structure

We will see later that this same Hamiltonian allows us to calculate the properties of a nucleus ANYWHERE in the triangle simply by

choosing appropriate values of the parameters

Page 44: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

SU(3)

Deformed nuclei

Page 45: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

M

Page 46: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Examples of energies of different representations of SU(3), that is, different (, )

E = A [ 2 + 2 + + 3 ( + ) ] + BJ (J + 1) f (, )

N = 16

E ( ) = A [ f (28, 2) – f (32, 0) ] = A [ (28)2 + (2)2 + 2(28) + 3(28 + 2) ]

– [ (32)2 + 0 + 0 + 3(32 + 0) ]

= A [ 934 - 1120 ] = -186 A, A < 0

So if E ( ) ~ 1 MeV, then A ~ 5-6 keV More generally,

E ( ) = A [ (2N)2 + 3 (2N) ] – [ (2N - 4)2 +4+(2N - 4)(2) +3 (2N – 4 + 2)] = A 4N2 + 6N – [ 4N2 – 16N + 16 + 4 + 4 N – 8 + 6N – 12 + 6)]

= A (12N – 6)

~ 2N - 1

(28, 2)

(32, 0) 10

20

20

20

20

Page 47: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Typical SU(3) SchemeTypical SU(3) Scheme

SU(3) O(3)

K bands in (, ) : K = 0, 2, 4, - - - -

Page 48: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Signatures of SU(3)Signatures of SU(3)

E = E

B ( g ) 0

Z 0

B ( g ) B ( g )

E ( -vib ) (2N - 1)

1/6

Page 49: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Signatures of SU(3)Signatures of SU(3)

Page 50: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Totally typical example

Similar in many ways to SU(3). But note that the two excited excitations are not degenerate as they should be in SU(3). While SU(3) describes an axially symmetric rotor,

not all rotors are described by SU(3) – see later discussion

Page 51: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

E2 Transitions in SU(3)

Q = (s†d + d†s) + (- 7

2) (d†d )(2)

Q is also in H and is a Casimir operator of SU(3), so conserves , .

B(E2; J + 2 →J)yrast

B(E2; +12 → +

10 )

N2 for large N

Typ. Of many IBA predictions → Geometric Model as N → ∞ Δ (, ) = 0

2 2 13

2 2 34 2 3 2 5B

J JN J N J

J Je

SU(3)

1 1

1 1

( 2;4 2 ) 10 (2 2)(2 5)

( 2;2 0 ) 7 (2 )(2 3)

B E N N

B E N N

E2: Δ (, ) = 0

2 2 3

5BN N

e

Alaga rule Finite N correction

“β”→ γ Collective B(E2)s

Page 52: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Example of finite boson number effects in the IBA

B(E2: 2 0): U(5) ~ N; SU(3) ~ N(2N + 3) ~ N2

B(E2)

~N

N2

N

Mid-shell

H = ε nd - Q Q and keep the parameters constant.What do you predict for this B(E2) value??

!!!

Page 53: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

O(6)

Axially asymmetric nuclei(gamma-soft)

Page 54: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic
Page 55: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic
Page 56: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic
Page 57: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Transition Rates

T(E2) = eBQ Q = (s†d + d†s)

B(E2; J + 2 → J) = 2B

J+ 1

24

J Je N - N2 2 J + 5

B(E2; 21 → 01) ~ 2B

+ 4e

5N N

N2

Consider E2 selection rules Δσ = 0 0+(σ = N - 2) – No allowed decays! Δτ = 1 0+( σ = N, τ = 3) – decays to 22 , not 12

O(6) E2 Δσ = 0 Δτ = 1

Note: Uses χ = o

Page 58: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic
Page 59: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

196Pt: Best (first) O(6) nucleus -soft

Page 60: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Xe – Ba O(6) - like

Page 61: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

Classifying Structure -- The Symmetry TriangleClassifying Structure -- The Symmetry Triangle

Most nuclei do not exhibit the idealized symmetries but rather lie in transitional regions. Mapping the triangle.

Sph.

Deformed

Page 62: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic

The IBA: convenient model that spans the entire The IBA: convenient model that spans the entire triangle of colllective structurestriangle of colllective structures

H = ε nd - Q Q Parameters: , (within Q)/ε

Sph. Driving Def. Driving

H = c [

ζ ( 1 – ζ ) nd 4NB Qχ ·Qχ - ]

Competition: : 0 to infinity /ε

Span triangle with and

Parameters already known for many nuclei

c is an overall scale factor giving the overall energy scale. Normally, it is fit to the first 2+ state.

Page 63: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic
Page 64: Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic