The_design_journal_design finlandês
Transcript of The_design_journal_design finlandês
-
7/28/2019 The_design_journal_design finlands
1/5
136
REPRINTS AVAILABLE
DIRECTLY FROM THE
PUBLISHERS
PHOTOCOPYING
PERMITTED BY
LICENSE ONLY
BERG 2011
PRINTED IN THE UK
The Design Journal VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1
PP 136140
TheDe
signJournal
DOI:10.2752/175630610X12877385838966
Book Review
Finnish Design: AConcise HistorybyPa krnmaaHelsinki, Finland: University of Art and
Design Helsinki, 2009, 336pp. Paperback
ISBN 978-951-558-295-9. 48.
kjtl FallanIn the Nordic countries, design history as a
distinct eld o study is experiencing a period o
expansion and revitalization. New scholars arestudying new material in new ways, and oten with an
international outlook both in terms o theoretical perspect-
ives and to an increasing degree publication strategies.
While this bodes well or the uture, little has thus ar
been available in English and published with international
distribution. Looking beyond the design pornography
oered by aestheticizing coee table books and hagiographic
exhibition catalogues, even survey books o Nordic design
aimed at an international public are ew and ar between.
In general, national survey histories are oten published
in native languages, primarily with domestic audiences in
mind. Some are translated into English most are not. Also,
national survey histories represent a notoriously dicult
category, and the broad strokes and quick pace it requires
+
-
7/28/2019 The_design_journal_design finlands
2/5
TheDe
signJournal
137
Book Reviews
are eective deterrents in a scholarly environment dominated by
micro histories and theoretical musings. All the more pleasing, then,
that Pekka Korvenmaa has taken on the challenging exercise o
writing such a book and publishing it in English.
Finnish Design: A Concise Historypresents the history o Finnish
design rom around 1870 to the present. Rather than basing thechronological demarcation on political milestones like the 1809
separation rom Sweden or the 1917 independence rom Russia, the
starting point o the narrative is chosen because many o the major
institutions that would orm Finnish design discourse were ounded
in the 1870s. While this choice is not sel-evident and unproblematic,
it has the merit o acilitating a history o design that stands on its
own rather than becoming a refection o the nations political history.
Bringing the account all the way to the present makes sense in that
any other chosen halt point would seem arbitrary, but historicizingones own present is no easy eat. Nevertheless, contemporary
design discourse in Finland is o great interest, and there is no way
better to understand it than in light o its history. For this reason, and
others, the book oers a somewhat more comprehensive analysis o
the period stretching rom the Second World War to the present than
it does o the earlier period.
The book is structured chronologically, in eight chapters, each
discussing relatively well-dened periods. The rst concerns the late
nineteenth century and presents the ounding in the 1870s o major
institutions like the Finnish Society o Crats and Design, the Museum
o Applied Art and the Crat School, and outlines an emerging applied
art community. The second chapter deals with the period leading
up to Finlands independence and explores the entanglement o
nationalism and internationalism in design culture. Chapter 3, on
the inter-war years, ocuses on the relation between tradition and
modernity. Chapter 4 explores the role o design in the makeshit
conditions o wartime and in the early post-war reconstruction
eorts. Chapter 5, tellingly entitled The Great Rise, chronicles the
remarkable international ame and commercial success o Finnishdesign in the 1950s and 1960s. Chapter 6 tells the heterogeneous
history o the 1960s and 1970s, tracing developments such as the
proessionalization and dispersion o industrial design, the changes
in consumption patterns resulting rom growing aluence, and
the increasing concern about issues such as social responsibility,
ecology and heritage. Chapter 7 outlines the apprehensive approach
to postmodernism in Finland in the 1980s as well as the crucial
developments in the telecommunications industry. The eighth and
nal chapter boldly outlines major trends in the immediate past and
present, giving due attention to actors such as the grave economic
recession o the early 1990s and how design became an integral
part in the macro-political strategies or recovery, and the growing
interest in design management and branding.
-
7/28/2019 The_design_journal_design finlands
3/5
TheDe
signJournal
138
Book Reviews
Korvenmaa argues that the rst part o his timeline the late
nineteenth and early twentieth centuries are already well researched
and can thus be treated more concisely in the present context. While
it is true that extensive research has been done on this topic, only
a small portion o it is available to an international public, and it is
thereore essential that this material is not omitted rom or treatedtoo cursorily in the rst English language survey. Luckily, the author
exaggerates his disclaimer, and the period in question is given due
attention as ar as one can expect rom a survey history.
A national survey history naturally raises questions about nation-
alism and design. The intimate links between these concepts in
Finland is a well-rehearsed theme, especially in English language
accounts, the conventional position being that the late nineteenth
century represents an awakening o both nationalism and design
and a resulting quest or national ormal expressions in design.While there certainly is some truth to such claims, Korvenmaa does
a good job in qualiying these myths by demonstrating that the
overwhelming majority o objects . . . o the late nineteenth century
were based on adaptations o leading historical styles created in
accordance with international examples (p. 28). The Finnishness
or which Finnish design would later receive recognition abroad was
in act acilitated only by the incorporation o international currents
a trait it shared with other national design discourses.
The book is characterized by certain recurring themes and
distinguishing traits. One o the topics to which Korvenmaa returns
again and again is that o design education. One explanation or
this is the peculiar situation that Finland until recently had only one
higher education institution training designers, making this school
all the more important in orming design discourse. Founded as
The Crat School in 1871, it became the Central School o Arts and
Crats in 1886. Reormed and renamed as the Institute o Industrial
Art in 1949, given a our-year curriculum and taken over by the
state in 1965, it achieved university status in 1973 under the name
University o Art and Design Helsinki. Educational aspects are alwayssignicant and rewarding subjects o design history, but the Finnish
case outlined here becomes even more pertinent and interesting in
light o the dramatic changes currently under way in Finnish design
education, in which the University o Art and Design Helsinki has
merged with the Helsinki School o Economics and the Helsinki
University o Technology to orm the Aalto University, ocially opened
earlier this year.
Another subject that is treated relatively comprehensively is
exhibitions, both domestic and abroad. These discussions provide
insight into how Finnish design has been staged, promoted and
perceived, and all in line with the increased attention to various
orms o mediation arenas and processes in international design
history at the moment. The consumption sphere o design culture,
-
7/28/2019 The_design_journal_design finlands
4/5
TheDe
signJournal
139
Book Reviews
however, does not gure prominently in this book. Whereas con-
ceived changes in consumer behaviour are mentioned rom time to
time, any substantial examination o design as consumer culture is
absent but then again it would be impossible to cram all aspects
o design culture into a survey history, and the priorities made are
sound enough.A commendable eature o the book, which sets it apart rom
many o its kind, is that whereas the usual suspects o amous
designers, manuacturers and products are duly presented and
make up the bulk o the book, Korvenmaa reminds us time and again
that this is only part o the picture, that the material culture that orms
design historys subject matter actually is dominated by what he calls
a mainstream o anonymous products (p. 59). That being said, this
mainstream is rarely explored beyond the level o being mentioned in
passing. A slight shit o balance, here, between the iconic and theanonymous would have made or a more surprising and engaging
account. Nevertheless, it is invigorating to see a survey history o
Finnish design that does not limit itsel to beautiul objects or the
home, but also includes tractors, toilets, trucks, telephones and
televisions, and treats industrial design in the broader sense properly.
A similarly rereshing trait is that the modernist ethos, which
has permeated design historiography especially in more popular
accounts like survey histories is, although not eradicated, then
certainly moderated and complemented. Again, the heroic gures
and products o modernism dominate, but the omnipresence o
non-modernist design in our material culture is at least mentioned
and illustrated by a ew examples. Korvenmaa writes: The slow
stream o tradition still continued alongside modernism and that
Thereore, the image o the applied arts o the 1930s is richer than
some have wanted to see it in retrospect (p. 129). In the same
vein he remarks how the 1940s were marked by romanticizing
trends emphasizing comort and enhancements o everyday lie (p.
157). Recognizing such phenomena is essential or the academic
credibility o design history, and the author should be commendedor his eorts, although he could at times have done more to qualiy
and question the image that the international public had o Finland
as an Eldorado o modern architecture and design (p. 194).
Despite the obvious limitations o the survey ormat, the book is
well contextualized. The history o Finnish design is presented as
rmly embedded in broader political, economical, technological,
social and cultural processes. This helps distance this book rom the
introversion and superciality that may easily gain the upper hand in
publications o this kind. Survey histories have their limitations, but
Pekka Korvenmaa has succeeded in the dicult task o presenting
the rich history o Finnish design both briefy and boldly.
-
7/28/2019 The_design_journal_design finlands
5/5
TheDe
signJournal
140
Book Reviews
Bgraphy
Dr Kjetil Fallan is Associate Proessor o Design History in the
Department o Philosophy, Classics, History o Art and Ideas at the
University o Oslo. He is the author oDesign History: Understanding
Theory and Method (Berg, 2010) as well as numerous articles
published in journals including theJournal of Design History, DesignIssues, Enterprise and Societyand History and Technology. His
edited volume Scandinavian Design: Alternative Histories is orth-
coming with Berg (2012). Fallan also serves on the Editorial Board o
theJournal of Design History.