The_design_journal_design finlandês

download The_design_journal_design finlandês

of 5

Transcript of The_design_journal_design finlandês

  • 7/28/2019 The_design_journal_design finlands

    1/5

    136

    REPRINTS AVAILABLE

    DIRECTLY FROM THE

    PUBLISHERS

    PHOTOCOPYING

    PERMITTED BY

    LICENSE ONLY

    BERG 2011

    PRINTED IN THE UK

    The Design Journal VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1

    PP 136140

    TheDe

    signJournal

    DOI:10.2752/175630610X12877385838966

    Book Review

    Finnish Design: AConcise HistorybyPa krnmaaHelsinki, Finland: University of Art and

    Design Helsinki, 2009, 336pp. Paperback

    ISBN 978-951-558-295-9. 48.

    kjtl FallanIn the Nordic countries, design history as a

    distinct eld o study is experiencing a period o

    expansion and revitalization. New scholars arestudying new material in new ways, and oten with an

    international outlook both in terms o theoretical perspect-

    ives and to an increasing degree publication strategies.

    While this bodes well or the uture, little has thus ar

    been available in English and published with international

    distribution. Looking beyond the design pornography

    oered by aestheticizing coee table books and hagiographic

    exhibition catalogues, even survey books o Nordic design

    aimed at an international public are ew and ar between.

    In general, national survey histories are oten published

    in native languages, primarily with domestic audiences in

    mind. Some are translated into English most are not. Also,

    national survey histories represent a notoriously dicult

    category, and the broad strokes and quick pace it requires

    +

  • 7/28/2019 The_design_journal_design finlands

    2/5

    TheDe

    signJournal

    137

    Book Reviews

    are eective deterrents in a scholarly environment dominated by

    micro histories and theoretical musings. All the more pleasing, then,

    that Pekka Korvenmaa has taken on the challenging exercise o

    writing such a book and publishing it in English.

    Finnish Design: A Concise Historypresents the history o Finnish

    design rom around 1870 to the present. Rather than basing thechronological demarcation on political milestones like the 1809

    separation rom Sweden or the 1917 independence rom Russia, the

    starting point o the narrative is chosen because many o the major

    institutions that would orm Finnish design discourse were ounded

    in the 1870s. While this choice is not sel-evident and unproblematic,

    it has the merit o acilitating a history o design that stands on its

    own rather than becoming a refection o the nations political history.

    Bringing the account all the way to the present makes sense in that

    any other chosen halt point would seem arbitrary, but historicizingones own present is no easy eat. Nevertheless, contemporary

    design discourse in Finland is o great interest, and there is no way

    better to understand it than in light o its history. For this reason, and

    others, the book oers a somewhat more comprehensive analysis o

    the period stretching rom the Second World War to the present than

    it does o the earlier period.

    The book is structured chronologically, in eight chapters, each

    discussing relatively well-dened periods. The rst concerns the late

    nineteenth century and presents the ounding in the 1870s o major

    institutions like the Finnish Society o Crats and Design, the Museum

    o Applied Art and the Crat School, and outlines an emerging applied

    art community. The second chapter deals with the period leading

    up to Finlands independence and explores the entanglement o

    nationalism and internationalism in design culture. Chapter 3, on

    the inter-war years, ocuses on the relation between tradition and

    modernity. Chapter 4 explores the role o design in the makeshit

    conditions o wartime and in the early post-war reconstruction

    eorts. Chapter 5, tellingly entitled The Great Rise, chronicles the

    remarkable international ame and commercial success o Finnishdesign in the 1950s and 1960s. Chapter 6 tells the heterogeneous

    history o the 1960s and 1970s, tracing developments such as the

    proessionalization and dispersion o industrial design, the changes

    in consumption patterns resulting rom growing aluence, and

    the increasing concern about issues such as social responsibility,

    ecology and heritage. Chapter 7 outlines the apprehensive approach

    to postmodernism in Finland in the 1980s as well as the crucial

    developments in the telecommunications industry. The eighth and

    nal chapter boldly outlines major trends in the immediate past and

    present, giving due attention to actors such as the grave economic

    recession o the early 1990s and how design became an integral

    part in the macro-political strategies or recovery, and the growing

    interest in design management and branding.

  • 7/28/2019 The_design_journal_design finlands

    3/5

    TheDe

    signJournal

    138

    Book Reviews

    Korvenmaa argues that the rst part o his timeline the late

    nineteenth and early twentieth centuries are already well researched

    and can thus be treated more concisely in the present context. While

    it is true that extensive research has been done on this topic, only

    a small portion o it is available to an international public, and it is

    thereore essential that this material is not omitted rom or treatedtoo cursorily in the rst English language survey. Luckily, the author

    exaggerates his disclaimer, and the period in question is given due

    attention as ar as one can expect rom a survey history.

    A national survey history naturally raises questions about nation-

    alism and design. The intimate links between these concepts in

    Finland is a well-rehearsed theme, especially in English language

    accounts, the conventional position being that the late nineteenth

    century represents an awakening o both nationalism and design

    and a resulting quest or national ormal expressions in design.While there certainly is some truth to such claims, Korvenmaa does

    a good job in qualiying these myths by demonstrating that the

    overwhelming majority o objects . . . o the late nineteenth century

    were based on adaptations o leading historical styles created in

    accordance with international examples (p. 28). The Finnishness

    or which Finnish design would later receive recognition abroad was

    in act acilitated only by the incorporation o international currents

    a trait it shared with other national design discourses.

    The book is characterized by certain recurring themes and

    distinguishing traits. One o the topics to which Korvenmaa returns

    again and again is that o design education. One explanation or

    this is the peculiar situation that Finland until recently had only one

    higher education institution training designers, making this school

    all the more important in orming design discourse. Founded as

    The Crat School in 1871, it became the Central School o Arts and

    Crats in 1886. Reormed and renamed as the Institute o Industrial

    Art in 1949, given a our-year curriculum and taken over by the

    state in 1965, it achieved university status in 1973 under the name

    University o Art and Design Helsinki. Educational aspects are alwayssignicant and rewarding subjects o design history, but the Finnish

    case outlined here becomes even more pertinent and interesting in

    light o the dramatic changes currently under way in Finnish design

    education, in which the University o Art and Design Helsinki has

    merged with the Helsinki School o Economics and the Helsinki

    University o Technology to orm the Aalto University, ocially opened

    earlier this year.

    Another subject that is treated relatively comprehensively is

    exhibitions, both domestic and abroad. These discussions provide

    insight into how Finnish design has been staged, promoted and

    perceived, and all in line with the increased attention to various

    orms o mediation arenas and processes in international design

    history at the moment. The consumption sphere o design culture,

  • 7/28/2019 The_design_journal_design finlands

    4/5

    TheDe

    signJournal

    139

    Book Reviews

    however, does not gure prominently in this book. Whereas con-

    ceived changes in consumer behaviour are mentioned rom time to

    time, any substantial examination o design as consumer culture is

    absent but then again it would be impossible to cram all aspects

    o design culture into a survey history, and the priorities made are

    sound enough.A commendable eature o the book, which sets it apart rom

    many o its kind, is that whereas the usual suspects o amous

    designers, manuacturers and products are duly presented and

    make up the bulk o the book, Korvenmaa reminds us time and again

    that this is only part o the picture, that the material culture that orms

    design historys subject matter actually is dominated by what he calls

    a mainstream o anonymous products (p. 59). That being said, this

    mainstream is rarely explored beyond the level o being mentioned in

    passing. A slight shit o balance, here, between the iconic and theanonymous would have made or a more surprising and engaging

    account. Nevertheless, it is invigorating to see a survey history o

    Finnish design that does not limit itsel to beautiul objects or the

    home, but also includes tractors, toilets, trucks, telephones and

    televisions, and treats industrial design in the broader sense properly.

    A similarly rereshing trait is that the modernist ethos, which

    has permeated design historiography especially in more popular

    accounts like survey histories is, although not eradicated, then

    certainly moderated and complemented. Again, the heroic gures

    and products o modernism dominate, but the omnipresence o

    non-modernist design in our material culture is at least mentioned

    and illustrated by a ew examples. Korvenmaa writes: The slow

    stream o tradition still continued alongside modernism and that

    Thereore, the image o the applied arts o the 1930s is richer than

    some have wanted to see it in retrospect (p. 129). In the same

    vein he remarks how the 1940s were marked by romanticizing

    trends emphasizing comort and enhancements o everyday lie (p.

    157). Recognizing such phenomena is essential or the academic

    credibility o design history, and the author should be commendedor his eorts, although he could at times have done more to qualiy

    and question the image that the international public had o Finland

    as an Eldorado o modern architecture and design (p. 194).

    Despite the obvious limitations o the survey ormat, the book is

    well contextualized. The history o Finnish design is presented as

    rmly embedded in broader political, economical, technological,

    social and cultural processes. This helps distance this book rom the

    introversion and superciality that may easily gain the upper hand in

    publications o this kind. Survey histories have their limitations, but

    Pekka Korvenmaa has succeeded in the dicult task o presenting

    the rich history o Finnish design both briefy and boldly.

  • 7/28/2019 The_design_journal_design finlands

    5/5

    TheDe

    signJournal

    140

    Book Reviews

    Bgraphy

    Dr Kjetil Fallan is Associate Proessor o Design History in the

    Department o Philosophy, Classics, History o Art and Ideas at the

    University o Oslo. He is the author oDesign History: Understanding

    Theory and Method (Berg, 2010) as well as numerous articles

    published in journals including theJournal of Design History, DesignIssues, Enterprise and Societyand History and Technology. His

    edited volume Scandinavian Design: Alternative Histories is orth-

    coming with Berg (2012). Fallan also serves on the Editorial Board o

    theJournal of Design History.