FIGHT FLIGHT To Run or to Fight! FIGHT FLIGHT FEAR! What is fear? What causes fear?
The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back
-
Upload
naral-pro-choice-america -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
3.630 -
download
2
description
Transcript of The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back
![Page 1: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Nancy Keenan, PresidentDonna Crane, Policy Director
April 28, 2011
The War on Women:More Than 400 Reasons to
Fight Back
![Page 2: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
112th Congress At a Glance
155
34
246
0
100
200
300
Pro-choice Mixed-choice Anti-choice
House of Representatives
40
14
46
0
10
20
30
40
50
Pro-choice Mixed-choice Anti-choice
Senate
![Page 3: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Federal Action, January-April 2011
• Attacks on health-care reform• “Stupak on Steroids” agenda: H.R.3 & H.R.358• Attempt to zero out Title X family-planning
program• Efforts to defund Planned Parenthood• D.C. abortion ban reimposed
House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) called H.R.3 one of his “highest legislative priorities.”- ABC News, January 20, 2011
![Page 4: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Attacks on Health-Care Reform
• House voted to repeal full law–H.R.2: 245-189
• House voted twice to defund law– Pitts amendment to H.R.1: 239-183–H.Con.Res.35: 240-185
![Page 5: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
“Stupak on Steroids” Agenda
![Page 6: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Attempt to Zero Out Title X Family-Planning Program
• Title X (ten) is the nation's cornerstone family-planning program for low-income women
• House voted to eliminate the program: 235-189
• Final FY’11 budget cut $17 million from the program
![Page 7: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Efforts to Defund Planned Parenthood
• House voted twice to defund Planned Parenthood:– Pence Amendment to H.R.1: 240-185– H.Con.Res.36: 241-185
• Failed in Senate: 42-58
NARAL Pro-Choice America in Action: On April 7, thousands of pro-choice activists stormed Capitol Hill as anti-choice House leaders bring government to brink of shutdown over defunding Planned Parenthood.
![Page 8: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
D.C. Abortion Ban Reimposed• In 2009, for the first time in 14 years, Congress
lifted its ban on the District's use of its own privately raised funds to provide abortion care to its low-income residents.
• Final FY’11 budget reinstated the ban
• Once the ban was reinstated, Medicaid immediately stopped paying for abortion care in D.C.
Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, speaks out against D.C. abortion ban at news conference with Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), Mayor Vincent Gray, and other local leaders.
![Page 9: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Changes in States’ Political Composition
2010
2011
Pro-choice 17 17*
Mixed-choice 12 5
Anti-choice 21 29
2010 2011
Pro-choice
5 7*
Anti-choice
10 15
2010 2011
Pro-choice
11* 9*
Anti-choice
16 19
State Governments
State Legislatures
Governors
*including the District of Columbia
![Page 10: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
0
100
200
300
400
500
2010 2011
Anti-Choice State Legislation
Being Tracked
175
427
![Page 11: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
State Action, January-April 2011
• Abortion-coverage bans• Nebraska copycat bans• Mandatory-ultrasound legislation• “Personhood” measures• Race- and sex-based attacks
![Page 12: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Abortion-Coverage Bans• Before health-care reform, 5 states
banned insurance from covering abortion
• Following health-care reform, 9 enacted some sort of abortion coverage ban– 5 states enacted bans in 2010– 4 states enacted bans in 2011 (and 1 ban
vetoed)
• Currently, a total of 11 states have some sort of abortion coverage ban (some states have enacted multiple bans)
• Legislation filed so far in 2011: 53 bills in 23 states
![Page 13: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Abortion-Coverage Bans Pre-PPACA
Statewide abortion-coverage ban existed prior to health-care reform
![Page 14: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Current Law: Abortion-Coverage Bans
Statewide abortion-coverage banAbortion-coverage ban in exchange
![Page 15: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Abortion-Coverage Bans: Current & Proposed
Abortion-coverage ban proposed in 2011
Statewide abortion-coverage banAbortion-coverage ban in exchange
![Page 16: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Nebraska Copycat Bans
• Bans abortion after 20 weeks with almost no exceptions
• Legislation filed so far in 2011: 31 bills in 15 states: AL, AR, FL, GA, IA, ID, IN, KS, KY, MN, MS, NM, OK, OR, and SC
• Enacted so far in 2011: ID, KS, and OK• National Right to Life Committee
anticipates 5 more states will pass similar measures this session
![Page 17: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Mandatory-Ultrasound Legislation
• Before 2011 session, 21 states had some type of ultrasound provision on the books
• Legislation filed so far in 2011: 28 ultrasound-related bills in 14 states: AL, AR, AZ, CT, FL, IN, KY, MI, MT, NC, OH, RI, TX, VA
• Enacted so far in 2011: AZ• By comparison, only 9 ultrasound-related
bills were considered in 2010; 3 passed: FL (vetoed), LA (in effect), and OK (in litigation)
![Page 18: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
“Personhood” Measures
• Personhood USA now claiming activity in all 50 states
• On the 2011 ballot in MS• Threatened for 2012 ballot in FL• Legislation filed so far in 2011: 22 bills in
14 states: IA, KS, LA, MI, MT, ND, NH, NY, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA
• By comparison, only 7 bills were considered in 2010
![Page 19: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Race- and Sex-Based Attacks
• Legislation filed so far in 2011: 8 bills in 5 states: AZ, KS, MA, RI, and WV
• Enacted so far in 2011: AZ• Billboards in 11 states: AR, CA, FL,
GA, IL, MO, NY, OH, TN, TX, and WI
![Page 20: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
State Rep. Nickie J. AntonioKellie Copeland, Executive
Director
![Page 22: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Changes in Ohio’s Political Composition
State Government
State Legislature
2010
2011
Pro-choice
Mixed-choice x
Anti-choice x
Senate House
2010
2011
Pro-choice
Mixed-choice
Anti-choice x x
2010
2011
Pro-choice
Mixed-choice x
Anti-choice x
![Page 23: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Effects of Ohio’s Electoral Changes
• A multitude of extreme attacks against women.–HB 125, the so-called “heartbeat bill”–HB 78/S 72, 20-week viability testing–HB 63/SB 8, judicial bypass–HB 7, Post-viability abortion ban with
dangerously narrow health exception–HB 79, ban on insurance coverage of
abortion
![Page 24: The War on Women: More Than 400 Reasons to Fight Back](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062418/5541d252b4c905bf168b459d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Resources
NARAL Pro-Choice Americawww.ProChoiceAmerica.org
NARAL Pro-Choice Ohiowww.ProChoiceOhio.org
Media Inquiries: 202-973-3032 or