THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… ·...
Transcript of THE VALUE OF REPUTATIONpthistle.faculty.unlv.edu/FIN 740_Spring2020/Week03/3B_Reputation-Ful… ·...
THE VALUE OF REPUTATION
1
Reputation■ Reputation is a valuable asset
■ Value of reputation is PV of cash flows earned when you continue to perform as promised
■ Cost of lost reputation is the PV of higher costs/lost revenue when firms are discovered to have cheated their investors, suppliers, employees, or customers.
– Counterparties stop doing business with the firm, or change the terms with which they are willing to continue to do business with the firm.
■ Reputation is difficult to build, easy to damage
■ Risks to reputation are important strategic risks
2
What deters fraud: Three legs of a stool…
1. Regulations and regulators
2. Personal ethics and integrity
3. Market forces
– Repeat contracting and reputation
3
Obvious once you point it out, but underappreciated
4
Xerox’s cumulated market-adjusted returnsJanuary 1997 – December 2006
6/16/00: Xerox announces 2nd qtr 2000 earnings will not meet expectations
10/8/99: Xerox warns 3rd qtr 1999 earnings will be short of projections
7/3/00: SEC starts formal investigation
4/10-12/02: Wells Notice; SEC files civil complaint
3/26/07: SEC enforcement action concluded
1/1/97: Violation period begins
5
Price inflation during the violation period
Readjustment (back to $15.725b) = 23% of loss
Actual price path
}Losses due to legal penalties = $0.523b = 10% of loss
}
Reputation loss = $3.33b = 67% of loss}
Xerox’s reputation loss…
Hypothetical value without the short-term inflation from cooking the books
$11.864b
$16.864b
$15.725b
6
Source: Karpoff, Lee, and Martin (Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2008)
Fines3% Class actions
6%
Readjustment25%
Reputation loss66%
Legal headaches are relatively smallThis is the
larger part of the story
Xerox’s experience is close to the norm:
7
Source: Karpoff, Lee, and Martin (Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2008)
Fines3% Class actions
6%
Readjustment25%
Reputation loss66%
Legal headaches are relatively smallThis is the
larger part of the story
Xerox’s experience is close to the norm:
Product recalls
8
Reputation loss = 77%
Sources: Jarrell and Peltzman (JPE 1985), Rubin, Murphy, and Jarrell (Regulation 1988), Barber and Darrough (JPE 1996)
Direct cost = 23%
Frauds of private parties
9
Reputation loss = 93%
Sources: Karpoff and Lott (JLE 1993), Alexander (JLE 1999), Murphy, Shrieves, and Tibbs (JFQA 2009)
Direct cost = 7%
Airplane crashes(when airline bears some blame)
10
Sources: Chalk (Econ Inq. 1986), Mitchell and Maloney (JLE 1989), Borenstein and Zimmerman (AER 1988)
Direct cost = 38%
Reputation loss = 62%
Environmental violations
11
Direct cost = 100%
Sources: Klassen and McLaughlin (Mgmt. Sci. 1996), Karpoff, Lott, and Wehrly (JLE 2005)
Reputation loss = 0%
Why is reputation important for some types of misconduct and not for others?
■ Product recalls, frauds
– Firm has repeat business with harmed parties, or potentially harmed parties
– Customers, suppliers, employees change the terms of contract to reflect the higher probability that they will be harmed
12
Environmental violations
Harmed parties do not in general do business with the firm
Parties with whom the firm does business suffer little or no direct harm
Customers, suppliers, employees have no incentive to change the terms of contract
Reputation Loss■ V* - V = Readjustment + Fines + Lawsuits + Reputation
– V* = value without event– V = actual value– Readjustment = change in value from financial
restatement– Fines/Penalties – Lawsuits = judgements + settlements– Reputation
13
Reputation Loss■ Fines and Lawsuits can be observed
■ Readjustment can be estimated
– Suppose PE = 20■ Firm reports EPS = $5 => Share Price = $100
■ Firm restates earnings to EPS =$4.50
■ Assume PE remains fixed => Share Pride = $90
■ Readjustment is $10*Shares outstanding
■ Reputation is the residual
– (V* - V) – (Readjustment + Fines + Lawsuits)
14
Reputation Loss■ Need to estimate V*
– What firm value would have been without event
■ VR = Value after readjustment
■ Investors require return of r– Firm value grows at r per period
■ V* = VR(1+r)n
■ Need to estimate r
15