The tumor was found to be a glioblastoma initially, and had ......The tumor was found to be a...
Transcript of The tumor was found to be a glioblastoma initially, and had ......The tumor was found to be a...
Li G. Huang, Ph.D., D.ABNM, Jeffrey Oppenheim, M.D., Daniel E. Spitzer, M.D., G. Alexander Jones, M.D. Jeffrey W. Degen, M.D
Hudson Valley Brain and Spine Surgery, Suffern, NY, 10901
Good Samaritan Hospital, Suffern, NY, 10901
SEP-PR can be optimized by:
Using a 1x8 subdural contact grid to provide better coverage for the large brain tumor and lessen
the chance of the electrode being entirely anterior or posterior
Avoiding “off-axis” placement of the electrode
Selection of bandpass at 30-3000Hz
Total Intravenous Anesthesia
The patient is a 39 year-old male who presented with 1 week of memory loss, and one day of severe headache associated with emesis. The patient had no motor deficit. A CT scan of the brain demonstrated a large left frontotemporal ring-enhancing lesion. A true phase reversal was identified, and the operating surgeon incorporated the information to his surgical strategy. A gross total resection was achieved. The patient did well initially, and had normal strength postoperatively. The tumor was found to be a glioblastoma multiforme, and the patient ultimately died approximately 2.5 years after surgery. .
Figure 1 CT showed a Large frontotemporal
brain tumor
Figure 4. Phase reversal was observed between
contacts 2 and 4.Figure 6. Gross total resection of the
tumor was achieved.
An understanding of the optimal recording of the phase reversal aids in providing reliable and
useful information to the surgeon. Our technique is applicable to the resection of large and central
brain tumors as these are the surgeries in which accurate identification of the central sulcus is of
particular importance.
Optimize the phase reversal recording in challenging situations
Figure 7. Postoperative MRI
demonstrated gross total resection of the
tumor.
Figure 5. Median Nerve SSEPs were stable
throughout the procedure.
Figure 3. Phase reversal was not appreciated
with initial placement of the grid due to “off-
axis” recording
Figure 2. A subdural contact grid was placed
following dural opening (Adapted from
Medscape.com)
Somatosensory Evoked Potential- Phase Reversal
(SEP-PR) has been widely used to identify the
central sulcus during brain tumor resection by
cortical recording of the somatosensory evoked
potential to medial nerve stimulation. It provides
reliable information regarding the sensorimotor
region, and lays a foundation for functional
preservation(1,2). Studies showed that the
successful rate of SEP-PR recording is relatively
low among those patients with large central and
postcentral brain tumors(3).
1. Use of a 1x8 subdural contact grid to provide enough
length for SSEP recording.
2. Total intravenous anesthesia during surgery to
optimize sensitivity.
3. Set the recording filter at 30-3000Hz.
4. Ensure placement of the grid perpendicular to the
direction of the central sulcus and avoid “off-axis”
recording ( The recording electrode was not placed
over the sensory and motor hand areas(4))
1. Neoplasma, 2006;53(1):37-42.
2. Techniques in Neurosurgery, 2001; 7 (1): 4-11
3. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72:221-229
4. NeuroSurgery, 1996; 38(5): 962-970