The Township Of McNab/Braeside

The Township Of McNab/Braeside

Agenda

Planning Advisory Committee Meeting

Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 7:00 PM

Council Chambers

Page

1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 3. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 3.1. Dated February 14, 2017 4. DELEGATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

Nil.

5. MATTERS ARISING OUT OF DELEGATIONS HEARD

Nil.

6. ADOPTION OF PREVIOUS PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES 6.1.

January 10, 2017 3 - 8

7. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT

Nil.

8. REPORTS OF COMMITTEE OF PLANNING & OTHER BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND

COMMISSIONS

8.1.

Building/Septic Department Report January 2017 9 - 14

8.2.

Proposed Building Code Change: Mandatory Septic Pumping 15 - 17

8.3.

Committee of Adjustment Year End Report 18 - 19

9. INFORMATION ITEMS

Nil.

10. MOTIONS

Nil.

11. APPLICATIONS FOR CONSENT/MINOR VARIANCE/ZONING & OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 11.1. Consent Application - B-16/16 (Lot Addition)

Ian & Joan McKie - Part Lot 21, Concession 12(B), 903 Archibald Street Applicatin for Consent

Committee of Adjustment Notice of Consent and Public Meeting

Sewage System Inspector Comments

20 - 38

County of Renfrew Planning Report

12. APPLICATIONS FOR SUBDIVISION & SITE PLAN CONTROL 12.1.

Site Plan Application - KANSC Consulting Ltd. 39 - 43

13. UNFINISHED BUSINESS

Nil.

14. NEW BUSINESS

Nil.

15. NOTICE OF MOTIONS

Nil.

16. PUBLIC QUESTIONS

Members of the public in attendance may ask questions regarding items relevant to the business discussed during the meeting.

17. TEN YEAR PLAN 17.1. Correspondence Received regarding the 10 Year Building Plan

Aldene Styles

Scott McEwan

44 - 48

17.2.

Braeside RA Centre Layout 49 - 51

18. CLOSED MEETING SESSION

Nil.

19. ADJOURNMENT 20. NEXT MEETING

March 21, 2017

of 51

MINUTES

Planning Advisory Committee Meeting

Tuesday, January 10, 2017

Council Chambers 7:14 p.m.

COUNCIL PRESENT: All Members of the Planning Advisory Committee were in attendance this evening.

STAFF PRESENT: Lindsey Parkes, CAO/Clerk

Angela Young, Deputy Clerk

Angela Lochtie, Treasurer

Ryan Frew, Director of Public Works

Bruce Howarth, Senior Planner, County of Renfrew

MEDIA PRESENT: Nil.

1. Call to Order and Roll Call

2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof

There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest declared at this time.

3. Adoption of the Agenda

3.1 Dated January 10, 2017

With permission from the Planning Advisory Committee, Chair Armsden added the following to this evening's Agenda:

4.1 A PowerPoint presentation was added to the Zanderplan - Madawaska Shores Subdivision - 47-T-16002 delegation.

4.2 Mr. Jamie Boyce was added as a delegation.

14.1 A discussion regarding a Zoning Amendment Application was added to New Business.

Page 1 of 38

of 51

Planning Advisory Committee Meeting January 10, 2017

PAC - RECOMMENDATION - 1-2017

Moved by Scott Brum, seconded by Heather Lang

THAT the agenda dated January 10, 2017 be adopted as amended.

CARRIED.

4. Delegations and Presentations

4.1 Zanderplan - Madawaska Shores Subdivision - 47-T-16002

Mr. Wachna and his agent were not in attendance at this time. At the request of the Chair, Mr. Howarth gave a high level overview of this proposal.

4.2 Jamie Boyce - Official Plan Amendment #9

Jamie Boyce was unable to attend the Public Meeting Under the Planning Act to provide his comments with regards to Official Plan Amendment #9, however, the Planning Advisory Committee gave permission for Mr. Boyce's objection to the Official Plan Amendment to be expressed during this meeting. Chair Armsden thanked Mr. Boyce for his comments and requested he submit his comments to the CAO/Clerk in writing.

5. Matters Arising out of Delegations Heard

Nil.

6. Adoption of Previous Planning Advisory Committee Minutes

6.1 December 13, 2016



THAT the Planning Advisory Committee Minutes of the December 13, 2016 meeting be adopted as submitted and circulated.

CARRIED.

7. Planning & Development

Nil.

8. Reports of Committee of Planning & Other Boards, Committees and Commissions

8.1 Building/Septic Department Report – December 2016



Page 2 of 38

of 51


THAT the Planning Advisory Committee accept the Building/Septic Department Report for the month of December 2016 as submitted and circulated.

CARRIED.

9. Information Items

Nil.

10. Motions

Nil.

11. Applications for Consent/Minor Variance/Zoning & Official Plan Amendments

Nil.

12. Applications for Subdivision & Site Plan Control

12.1 Notice of Application for Subdivision - 47-T-16002 (Madawaska Shores)

- County of Renfrew Notice of Application for Subdivision

- Subdivision Application & Draft Plan


Moved by Heather Lang, seconded by Scott Brum

THAT the Planning Advisory Committee accept this Notice of Application for Subdivision - 47-T-16002 as information as submitted and circulated.

CARRIED.

Mr. Wachna joined the meeting at this time and reviewed the Madawaska Shores Application with the Planning Advisory Committee. (Madawaska Shores Presentation -11 slides attached - circulated during this evening's meeting).

The following concerns were brought up by the public in regard to this Application:

Q - Is there water access for the back lots?

A - No, it has been looked into, but there is no suitable access.

Q - Has the water flood area been addressed?

A - Yes, Ontario Power Generation will review and submit comments.

Q - This may be a fish spawn area, is the Ministry of Natural Resources involved?

A - There will be an Environmental Study completed, however, the Ministry of Natural Resources only gets involved if there are endangered species present.

C - There is already limited space at the boat launch.

C - A resident stated that he does not want a road constructed beside his home.

Page 3 of 38

of 51


13. Unfinished Business

Nil.

14. New Business

14.1 Proposed Zoning Amendment Application

Mr. Howarth advised that a Zoning By-Law Amendment Application was received, however, there were several deficiencies in the submission, being the Applicant is not the owner of the property, and there was other documentation that was not submitted with the Application.

Staff Direction: Staff was directed to send a letter to the Applicant stating that the Township will not accept the Application and refund the money.

15. Notice of Motions

Nil.

16. Public Questions

Nil.

17. Ten Year Plan

17.1 Correspondence Received Regarding the 10 Year Building Plan

- Joanne Cybulski

- Susan Howard & Drew Carmichael

- Jim & Sharol Havey


Moved by Scott Brum, seconded by Mark MacKenzie

THAT the Planning Advisory Committee accept the correspondence received regarding the 10 Year Building Plan as information as submitted and circulated.

CARRIED.

17.2 New Braeside RA Centre - Amended Design Option (Greenview Response to Public Meeting Comments - 2 pages attached - circulated during this evening's meeting).


Moved by Heather Lang, seconded by Tom Peckett

THAT the Planning Advisory Committee accept the correspondence from Greenview Environmental as information as submitted and circulated.

CARRIED.

Council discussed the viewing area and building design.

Page 4 of 38

of 51


The following comments were made by members of the public:

C - Its concerning that we may lose the hall there, there are a lot of functions there and I don't want to see something that we currently have taken away.

C - People are talking about starting a petition.

C - I would like to see the hall replaced.

Q - Has there been any talk of moving the ball diamond, to which the answer was no.

C - A view of the ice rink is important as there are a lot of kids using it.

Staff Direction: The CAO/Clerk was directed to arrange a meeting with Greenview and the Building Committee to address the viewing area and building design.

17.3 Perneel Building & New Municipal Office (Report to Planning Committee & Drawings -

19 pages attached - circulated during this evening's meeting).


Moved by Heather Lang, seconded by Tom Peckett

THAT the Planning Advisory Committee accept the Perneel Building & New Municipal Office update as information as submitted and circulated.

CARRIED.


Moved by Heather Lang, seconded by Scott Brum

THAT the Planning Advisory Committee agree to extend the hours of the Planning Advisory Committee Meeting by 30 minutes past the adjournment time of 10:00 p.m.

CARRIED.

18. Closed Meeting Session

18.1 Under Section 239(2)(c) - For the purpose of discussing a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or local board.


Moved by Tom Peckett, seconded by Mark MacKenzie

THAT this meeting become a closed session under Section 239(2)(c) for the purpose of discussing a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or local board at 10:00 p.m.

CARRIED.


Moved by Tom Peckett, seconded by Heather Lang

THAT the Planning Advisory Committee resume the open session at 10:12 p.m.

CARRIED.

Page 5 of 38

of 51


19. Adjournment

This Planning Advisory Committee Meeting adjourned at 10:12 p.m.

20. Next Meeting

February 14, 2017

CHAIR CAO/CLERK

Page 6 of 38

of 51

February 14, 2017

Report

To: Planning Advisory Committee

From: Chris Vereyken, Chief Building Official

Date: February 7, 2017

Subject: Building/Septic Department Report January 2017

Recommendation

THAT the Planning Advisory Committee accept the Building/Septic Department Report for the month of January 2017 as information as submitted and circulated.

Background

1. Building Activity January 2017

2. Building Activity January 2016

3. Septic Activity January 2017

4. Septic Activity January 2016

5. Permits Completed 2017

Reports for January are up to date

TARION

MPAC

MINISTRY OF LABOUR

STATS CANADA

CMHC

Respectfully Submitted,

Chris Vereyken, Chief Building Official

of 51

20}? Building Permits

mu,.33

an

0G2.4

Mnu_Hi:dull

/0ceatk

nu21:21

37. n1 mg2

W :0.a m3 1

J km.SS

Atx.N

DC...S

Dec.142016

of 51

500.800N0v.6 2015

an0..

,$

3

00«Z

on...iaw(JIll

613!.

AUS A/Man 6m 2F (0 1

e IP mg

M man H 0u R Q

B ,.m m6 .« ?x.4.1 AU3 32 O

0AU

DFS

of 51

2017 Septic Chart

Septic ?ermit.sJanna 2917

of 51

2016 Septic Chart

Septic Permits

Jana 7 2.06

<3c.720:5“ A

c:L,4F11:er }0 640 }an.620¥ 474:5 12,00

of 51

COMPLETED PERMITS 2017

January#16—O44#i6—032#17-163

of 51

February 14, 2017

Report


From: Chris Vereyken, Chief Building Official


Subject: Proposed Building Code Change: Mandatory Septic Pumping

Recommendation

THAT the Planning Advisory Committee accept this report as information as submitted and circulated.

Background

The Ministry of Municipal Affairs is proposing a change to part 8 of the 2012 Ontario Building Code that would require mandatory maintenance of sewage systems.

Discussion

There will be enforcement implications on the Municipality for maintaining these records. The building department believes this will add a significant amount of administration time that it may not have the resources for. We would estimate the additional administrative time at 1/2 a full time equivalent position (paperwork, tracking and compliance). The Township agrees that inspecting septic systems and regular pumping maintenance are reasonable and desirable goals, however, 5 years is an arbitrary target. A simple pump out does not address maintenance issues. The Township is opposed to mandatory septic pump outs on a 5 year arbitrary time frame.

People Consulted

MMAH

Lindsey Parkes, CAO/Clerk


Chris Vereyken, Chief Building Official

of 51

Ministry of Municipal Affairs

Building and Development Branch Page 1 © Copyright Queen’s Printer for Ontario 2016

PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED

CHANGE NUMBER: B-08-09-03

SOURCE: Ontario

CODE REFERENCE: Division B / 8.9.3.4

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

The proposed change requires regular pumping out of septic tanks and keeping of the septic tanks and treatment units’ maintenance records.

EXISTING 2012 BUILDING CODE PROVISION(S)

8.9.3. Maintenance

8.9.3.4. Class 4 Sewage Systems

(1) Septic tanks and other treatment units shall be cleaned whenever sludge and scum occupy one-third of the working capacity of the tank.

PROPOSED CODE CHANGE

8.9.3. Maintenance

8.9.3.4. Class 4 Sewage Systems

(1) Septic tanks and other treatment units shall be cleaned whenever sludge and scum occupy one-third of the working capacity of the tank or every within five years of the last pump out, whichever occurs first. .

(2) The records of septic tanks and treatment units cleaning as required by Sentences (1) shall be kept by the operator of the sewage system for submission to the chief building official upon request.

RATIONALE FOR CHANGE

Problem/General Background

The proponent requested the change to strengthen the maintenance requirements of septic systems through regular pump outs and to require record keeping thereof to help ensure compliance with the code requirements.

Conventional systems need to be maintained regularly. Current Code requirements do not include regular/periodic pump outs of septic tanks. The proposed requirement will make it mandatory to pump out septic tanks on a periodic basis and to keep the maintenance records of the pump out.

of 51

Building and Development Branch Page 2 © Copyright Queen’s Printer for Ontario 2016

Justification/Explanation

The proposed change will enhance the maintenance of conventional systems.

Cost/Benefit Implications

The change will add cost to homeowners who have not been regularly pumping out their septic tank. However, the cost will only occur every 5 years.

Enforcement Implications

There will enforcement implications on principal authorities due to the need for managing this program across their area of jurisdiction.

Who is Affected

Homeowners, building officials, installers and haulers.

Objective Based Analysis

Provision Objective/Functional Statement

Division B, 8.9.3.4.

(1) OE, OH2.1, OH5, F110, F111

(2) OE,OH5, F82,F110

OTHER SUPPORTING MATERIALS

of 51

February 13, 2017

Report


From: Committee of Adjustment

Date: January 23, 2017

Subject: 2016 Year End Report

Recommendation

THAT the Planning Advisory Committee accept the 2016 Committee of Adjustment Year End Report as information as submitted and circulated.


Committee of Adjustment

of 51

TOWNSHIP OF McNAB/BRAESIDE

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT

YEAR END REPORT FOR 2016

Number of Consent Applications 16

Deeded Lots 0

Deeded Lot Additions 1

Lots to be Deeded 7

Lot Additions to be Deeded 7

Easements Deeded 0

Applications Withdrawn 0

Applications Pending 1

Applications On-hold 0

Refused 0

Appealed to OMB 0

Number of Minor Variance Applications 0

Minor Variance Applications Granted 0

Minor Variance Applications Pending 0

Refused 0

Appealed to OMB 0

Withdrawn 0

of 51

To:

NOTIC

SubjectOwner:Locatio

CAO/Clerk Date: January 3”‘,2017

E OF HEARING - Place: Township of McNab/Braeside Municipal Office2508 Russet Drive, Amprior, Ontario, K7S 3G8

Time: 7:00 p.m.Date: February 27”‘,2017

Application for Consent B-16/16Ian & Joan McKiePart Lot 21, Concession l2(B), 903 Archibald StreetIll

The subject application has been received and it will be heard by the Township of McNab/Braeside Committee of

Adjustment on the above noted d ate. So that the circumstances can be properly considered in accordance with

the requirements of The Planning Act, the Committee requests that the information requested below is completedand one copy returned to us.

Helen Siroski, SecretaryCommittee of Adjustment

Comments: Z44/fog 44/ a/7 /Anzsrw//b»r«/’fig’M//7%7%} Afid/‘Er7"/W’//4’7»17(%t’

/4cccj,<§a_ry522;»/4/°/vgdn g‘Vr/2rp»'{/0”/$11/IIQ5: ram weé?/E/é L22 /27;. 5‘.-m/yrc}z//'re/a7‘ rim‘///'9/«>x;».4+fyéye (%

Chief Builémglgcial

ll Services Yes No

(a) Are the following services available to this land?Municipal Water

T

/Sanitary Sewers

j

ZElectricity 1/

_

Garbage Collection Zi

(b) Does both the proposed severance and retained lot have

E access to a public road maintained by the Municipality??

(c) If direct access is to a municipal public road:(i) Would access be obtained where a traffic

hazard would be created because of limited /Sight lines, curves or grades?j ?

(ii) Is the Municipality willing to issue an entrance permit? 1 __

(iii) ls road widening or dedication required??

L(d) Does a school bus service the area at the present time?

(i) If not, how far is the proposed lot from the closestServiced point?

Comments:

III Council/Planning Advisory Committee Comment Yes No(a) Does Council recommend consent be given?

j

_

(i) If not, outline reasons why.

(b) Should consent be granted, what conditions, if any, would Council wish to see applied?

Date Signed

CAO/Clerk

of 51

TU...

ate 2-12313‘W“'°”— ?t». APPIIBATIBNFIIIIBIINSEIIT

ECEWEDFRONTC0u“.‘.ElK1deI‘Section 53 of the Planning Act

R .

/522 75/M297270”?

File No.

34¢/(9Nameof ApprovalAuthority: Township of McNab/Braeside Committeeof Adjustment

2508 Russett Drive, Arnprior, ON K7S 3G8

Please prim‘ and complete or (J) appropriate bax(es).

1 WNERINFORMATIO(Pleseidicte L ners2‘

lackarrows ( D)den0teprescribed informationreqiredunder Ontario Regulation 197/96.V

>l.l NarneofOwner(s): IAN M M=—Kus4: _]‘,A_,., 5 ?x/¢.;<,,Z

Address: <3 MA—Iz<'—HVA 1-4: ‘P12. Postal Code:KA-IuA—7‘A~,om (4 aw gcz

Telephone No.: (Home) (Work) (Fax)1,13-¢3‘5=r—s’e4,{ (913-Ortiz-H3!

Email address: IA N. Mr.I<.lE 2.9 S‘/MP5-‘rlca. ¢-_,4

D 1.2 Name of Owner’s AuthorizedAgent (if applicable): /U/AAddress: Postal Code:

Home Telephone: (Home) (Work) (Fax)

E-mail address:

1.3 Please specify to whom all communications should be sent: Owner Agent Both

2 DESCRITTION OF THE SUBJECT LAND (Severed and Retained) CompleteapplicableBoxes in 2.1

D2.1 Lot(s) No.: PA.-av.-rLo-r 1 I Concessionzz / 3.03)

Registered Plan No.: K I o a;:L=L I Lot(s) No.:

Reference Plan No.: Part(s) No.:

Civic Address of subject lands/Road Name: 993 A-lieu-113A-Lb $7-.2: yr

>2.2No Yes

3. PURPOSE OF THIS APPLICATION

Are there any easements or restrictive covenants affecting the subject land?If Yes, describeeac 1 easement or covenant and its effect.

>3.1 Type and purpose of proposed transaction (¢ appropriatebox):

Creation of a new lot IKIAddition to a lot (see also 3.3)” 2.34.441.»

El An easement

. A charge [I A lease Cl A correction of title CI Other purpose:

July 2016

of 51

‘ ) 3.2 Name of person(s), if known, to whom land or interest in land is to be transferred, leasedor charged:

3.3 If a lot addition, identify on your accompanying sketch the lands to which the parcel will be added.

4. INFORl\/IATION REGARDING THE LAND INTENDED TO BE SEVERED AND THE LANDTO BE RETAINED

>4.1 Dimensions Severed Retained Lands beingadded to

Road Frontage (m) '51. oer '5 I - 09 /2’- 7~‘l

Depth (m) 19.4% 30.4% 39.4% \

Area(ha) .09! .D?b’ 49.09%

P 4.2 Use of the Property Existing Use“) 5,3,“ 5p,«,,,.; ;z.,;,M.,..,,.,,c,_ 5' MA” ;M_q,

Proposed Use(,s’) 3&"‘>"—'"T'-*'- 4* 4'50 Vii Gnu-—5?/Ht

) 4.3 Buildings or Existing Aacus vlvr g‘,1::‘ ,';_‘';'.‘f,‘'..,,.,CStructures ?nlf:-lI_:>;-::“u11>-.51:-.4_.,..,.<_s‘YAI3AwA»

Proposed DNLLLIU4'9 ""°’ V‘ Alana;

>4.4 Official Plan designation

>4.5 Current Zoning

) 4.6 Access‘

Severed Retained Lands being(V appropriate space) added to

ProvincialHighway

Municipal road, maintained all K WX 74year

Municipal road, seasonallymaintainedCounty road

Crown road

Other public road

Registered right of way (see 4.7)

Private Road (Unregistered) (see 4.7)

Water Access (see below)

If water access only, state the parking and docking facilities to be used and the approximatedistance of thesefacilities from the subject land and the nearest public road (attach schedule if more room is required):

>4.7 If access to the subject land is not by a public road, you MUST includeproof of your right of access

(include deed). '

Will a road extension be required? Yes No X

2 July 2016

of 51

>4.8 Water Supply Severed Retained Lands being0/ type 0f existing added toservice OR type that ~

would be used mauds Publiclyowned and operated

were to be developed) plped Water System

Privately owned and operatedK X

individual wellPrivately owned and operatedcommunal wellLake or other water body

Other means

V4.9 Sewage Publicly owned and operatedDisposal sanitary sewage system

Privately owned and operated X Kindividual septic systemPrivately owned and operatedcommunalseptic systemPrivy

Other means

V4.10 Other Electricity X XServices .

(/ if service is S°h°°1 Bus‘-Hgavailable)

Garbage Collection x _ ,4

5. PROVINCIAL POLICYSTATEMENT>5.1 Is the requestedconsent consistentwith the Provincial Policy Statement issuedunder Section 3(1) of the

Planning Act? [X] Yes ] No

5.2 If there areany‘agricultural buildings locatedonthe "adjacent lands,please indicate‘their approximate ’

location and distance to the subject lands (severed and retained) on the accompanyingsketch.

i 6. s HESO‘

D6.1 Has the subject land ever been the subject of: Yes No

An application for approval of a plan of subdivision xunder Section 51 of the Planning Act, or

An application for consent under Section 53 of thePlanning Act?

If Yes, and if Known, specify the ?le number of the application.6.2 If this application is a re-submission of a previous consent application,describehow it has been changed

from the original applicationandprovide the previous ?le number.

3 July 2016

of 51

‘ >6.3 Has any land been severed from the parcel originallyacquired by the owner of the subject land?I: Yes NoIf Yes, provide for each parcel severed, the date of transfer, the name of the transferee and the landuse

on the severed land:

7 OTHER CURRENT APPLICATIONSD7.1 Is the subject land the subject of any other application under the PlanningAct such as an applicationfor

amendment to an official plan, a zoning by-law amendment, a Minister’szoning order, a minorvariance,an approval of a plan of subdivision or an additional application for consent?

Yes D No Unknown If Yes, and if Known, specify the appropriate?lenumber and status of the application.

Cp;uc,u,7_K.nl?‘ Lu/-r-H A.-n2 0,4: Pic,/A-1. P1./a—nJ u— lz?. 3-0-2/:0; /('l"fII:—I0¢ mttor

b 8.1 Please attach a sketch to the one original application and provide seven duplicate sketches. Each sketchshallhave the severance parcel outlined in red and the retained parcelin green.

8.2 The sketch shall show the following information:I the boundariesand dimensionsof the subject land, the part that is to be severed and the part that is to

be retained0 the boundariesand dimensionsof any landowned by the owner of the subject land and that abuts the

subject land0 the distance between the subject land and the nearest township lot line or landmark, such as a

railway crossing or bridge- the location of all land previously severed from the parcel originallyacquiredby the current owner

of the subject land0 the approximate location of all natural and arti?cial features on the subject land and adjacentlands

that, in the opinion of the applicant, may affect the application. Examples include buildings, barns,railways, roads, watercourses, drainage ditches, river or stream banks, wetlands, wooded areas, wellsand septic tanks

0 the existing use(s) on adjacent land, such as residential, agricultural and commercialuses

0 the location, width and name of any roads within or abutting the subject land, indicatingwhetherit isan unopened road allowance, a public traveled road, a private road or a right-of-way

- if access to the subject land is by water only, the location of the parking and boat docking facilities

to be used

g g

0 the lcationand ntur o aset ectthe ujct and.H

p g_

' 7 V V

Plases ocatiof y ll sptict, septic?eldoweepgbd o b t ved dretained parcels and the setbacksfor any exiting well, septic tank, septic?led and/or weeping bed from the

. _ r°°5eneW1t1ine- , . , ..’

9. OTR INFORMATIO9.1 Is there any other information that you think may be useful to the Township of McNab/Braesideor other

agencies in reviewing this application? Ifso, explain below or attach on a separate page.

4 July 2016

of 51

10. DECLARATION OF FEES INCURRED

The Owner/Agent agrees to reimburse andindernnify the Township of McNab/Braesideof all fees and

expenses incurred by the Townshipof McNab/Braeside to process the application,including any fees

and expenses attributed to proceeding before the Ontario Municipal Board or any court or otheradministrative tribunal if necessary to defend Council’s decision to support the application.

The Owner/Agent also agrees to deposit with the Township of McNab/Braeside such monies as

required by the Township of McNab/Braeside’s Tariff of Fees By-Law as amended to defend appealsbrought before the OMB by parties other than the Applicant/Agent or Township.

The required fee for the processing of this application shall be in accordance with the Township of

McNab/Braeside’s current Tariff of Fees By—Lawpertaining to planningmatters. The Fees prescribeddo not include professional fees, (ie. legal or engineering), or extra public meetings. Prior toundertaking anyof these matters the applicant agrees to reimburse the Municipality for all charges

related to the application. Fees required for the processingof this applicationare required at the time of

submission. The amount of the required fees should be con?rmed with the Township prior to thesubmission of the application.

bicmauz 1?. Role

Date Sighatureof OwnerA°rgerrt-(

blotrt?i? /9%aweDate ture of Ownerlécgent

5 July 2016

of 51

1 F ORWRNDA RAIN or PLIT

D11.1 Affidavit or Sworn Declaration for the Prescribed Information

1, .7412 ‘I-I04-M /49$/5. ofthe C171 aw‘ 03-r4-u2A in

the ‘R9_;,muA—i.H,;.wei>m.,,.,oe 4-m<ux—Cnm.n§Qlemn1y declare that the information required by

0. Regulation 547/06 and all other information required in this application, including supporting

documentation, are true and I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing it to be true and

knowing that it is of the same force and effect as if made under oath and by virtue of the Canada

Evidence Act.

U Signature of Applicant

Sworn (or declared) before me at the C / ry on Qr-r-+..a..q

inthe ’iZPiéL°-VA-I.({.2u2¢uPA—I—:7-v 9F 0r"I"A-«.M-C,A-.J2.u;,ra-0

this / 9 T" day of beach BIEK ,20 / GVicki Maureen Lapiade,a commissioner, etc., Province ofOntario, for Ellisnon Corporation / . /,and its subsidiary. associated and . . .af??ated co[nDanies_ Signature of Commissioner of OathsExpires March 8, 2019.

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

Date Application received: 4 1 QQ!“ -

Fee paid: YesD

No

Hearing Date:_

,{9}v,~_/-, ,1 ' 5572/-

Committee File No: /51-Z7 6

/- /7/.17. / pi_ _

_.A 3

Date ."//37 Q0 /).f4- /2 Secretary,Committee of Adjustment/755

NOTE: One of the purposes of the Planning Act is to provide for planning processes that are open,

accessible, timely and efficient.Accordingly, all written submissions, documents, correspondence, e-mails or

other communications (including your name and address) form part of the public record and will be

disclosed/made available by the Township to such persons as the Township sees fit, including anyone

requesting such information.Accordingly, in providing any such information, you shall be deemed to have

consented to its use and disclosure as part ofthe planning process.

6 July 2016

of 51

12 OWNER’S AUTHORIZATIONIF THE OWNER IS NOT MAKING THE APPLICATION(Please completeeither 12.1 or 12.2 whichever is applicable)

>12.1 If the owner is not making the application,the following owner’s authorizationis required.

AUTHORIZATION OF OWNER(S) FOR AGENT TO MAKE THE APPLICATION

I, , am the owner(s) of the land that is the subject

of this application for a consent and I/we authorize

to make this applicationon my/our behalf.

Date Signature of Owner

Date Signature of Owner

> 12.2 If the owner is a Corporation, and is not making the application, the following owner’s authorizationisrequired.

CORPORATE AUTHORIZATION OF OWNER(S) FOR AGENT TO MAKE THE APPLICATION

I, , am an Of?cer/Director of the Corporationthat is the owner

of the land that is the subject of this Application for Consent and I hereby authorizeto make this applicationand provide instruction/informationon

behalf of the corporation.

Name of Corporation:

Date Signature of Corporate Representative& Title

Date Signature of Corporate Representative& Title

(I/We have authority to bind the corporationin the absence of a corporate seal).

7 July 2016

of 51

PmzrL_n1-24 C9/yXIl Pmaczu l‘7‘°‘1‘903 Auz;Huam.1> 51¢

4:14‘? M (FR:/~41 4-34~c\<\

IS} ‘- Exzsrm-4 l‘f'reE'L)r ‘M

0);)/zgr I>uam.z/ur, \}

E5:‘ _ 7. 22-I8“ H55!-1"‘ E

0 \I_) (S Eklsrt/-vr, 9'»:/’7’l.c 7704 83"f"’/f""’_k 1

'4 0 6*4

2'_5‘_""E_"f’*1" ~ "5

V4 . ad’ 2 7- r|- V ab -V i»

‘<1;X jg ‘. y . , , 4, AV . on

LA Enlsnuag2-sway' "‘

V

~ I g ) y .' IExIs‘HN< :1"gt

5”{

MAmmesozy E Qeu.n.mq 3 > x 1u : I ,_{ BwLD‘W‘ P‘

1‘ ._

. , ‘ -

3 G‘00 \

‘:3 --.<

\§ ‘\l

tn ‘9‘ 03

3A? ‘

’

" ‘ ' '

' ‘- - ~\‘

N

/o‘79M A4./4w 4.1» /7,-y;.,..,/‘aawir/r T T 7, ,

3’-73°13, , . /1, 30093 )1,

Z\”i_i.é_,++-fr54«,L1>érv ‘SN

9.9.14-m‘

/$.247”*’ “ A" ' ' 4’ 4’1_ ’ \

09‘_

v\E\ns1'Mq *3CABAMA §\

- \

%»’%w%»?—&«-§\_? /~—-»w—--——«-—-\_ ,M,—»-"‘--—--——-r*"“~-“"”"-> /'---

,, OTTAWA Rwgk

:,VC'<>;~/$75./V'!'Spam/as/aNV

:27-itsii:-3'90,9j0’b A,v.cr,nvsAL't7 5-rt T512/;z;ror, all 1,, M: K r;

V

.bso;~'r,.?o/e

of 51

Sc}eLa / ; 150 ll:1- Mc\< IE

_

,

DE}; 2 1.T

« /’*i"‘°‘[" P€_9R’l1..LO‘T"an Ca/4. ><// Pmzcus /7754 4

—

-~.—~—~— ___90 ?>A.Rc.HH3>4L-i>97-.Case» WELL ’

1;] ’» - 6F\-“iv-v» (Fa:>;~n- a BAQIC5 /JU —..— a

7 _ . . ..___.._.____.,....-__.. .._._,___-_ _\__ ?l‘

. ; W‘‘k ___Ex\s1:1Na. /— smnay__ 3 I

A

,3 .Guss1‘ Du/g1_|_nUc, ;~_1 -§——;—{i"=2-ax. KE.'t:r_A‘7-11>’ 1

3 W \\ ,.°,P~.,Jl!_!’\v4Dl—l.Sl+I.=J;'a

.1 ‘

_~

.~ ~ .,,,_,_______

v \\t‘ . .‘\

‘ § \ .2437

\ _‘_"f‘ 4 on»...

5" Ew-$75‘/N4Sa:>_ncTANK'

I \ + '1 +0. !\g i

W Fr?2- ‘7v~x></.>AW 3-—

M iv . “I"T" I“ I‘ T7 \

VA * '~~‘.-., ., ___, _____ «S»

A

| . ’‘

~- . Ewk ‘ ‘ I . « .4,Z —.

7 _, _'9'°9qW\ | I V‘

’/-0»-. ‘Ex/srmz, E] J‘M E><|.sTINq1-S-rotziy J ‘

* ' y .n /",°¢E5wK‘r\.~ +5

‘L ®wu?,_,NG— gj’ | | I ’ I| r‘_l Bun-Dwg 3 I? N.0 J 1 I ‘” , m

2 § I I I IV 5 \}

3 0:!‘ ' ' , ‘ I]:\:_

: »\

‘

&-1*" ’—N-—..l. "‘

<\£--—L ___:\_\L__3:" f 5 ‘-5‘\ _E [n

P3 35 Q §.‘Do «I (D. '

' “J I e 3: :

J9‘--_ .__ _

‘F;

. ‘

0.79 ./em ,

’ / /?M

._ 31.979 \~‘

M’é""°"“

SLDQBN77.7§‘vvL :

| /

Araw 1 an 1. D S 1‘.

1 r ,.r.:«.’V.., ,_V,I-,_w@*

,+§

M 1 --__’ —>‘§

iE ii ‘

3 I

3 S I

!u

1 §1' Rpvlsn-la i 3

‘ 534“ 3 0%) 2 L

,f.:'?.'§.',",,f< J Ak ,- s 0

CABANA I )5 1 F“

E‘ 3; 13 ~ I5 \

» A?

WH .i g :E >. £

%

3 } ..3 1

A I

_ -L-.. . ., _______W

_V

: ~—

— .4IV

1;““‘

It .O7"f‘A\Nf\RWERi

"i , As><>«..\c,+-non 5\<E.:l;C.HN; :”~‘ ~

~_

‘-

’

» == OFFWAL PL-ANA-NP 'Z'cN\NC\3~/onffw’"“’ Dwc’ RB'°°'

5 AMENDMENT ' "--— - W757D5‘-’°/'4_. _ _

H03 A1zu+\c¢m.v '81: , 13R/was/D: 9,4""7 " écm" "“""”

* ---- ~» —-— .._ -._,._._,___,_______

’— .VtzAwmm3y'IM,

REVISQBzrn... IL/q

of 51

t0‘l§S‘“P0FMMB/BRAEWETHE TOWNSHIP OF McNAB/BRAESIDECOMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT2508 Russett Drive, R.R. #2, Amprior, Ontario K7S 3G8

NOTICE OF A CONSENT APPLICATION AND PUBLIC MEETING

The Township of McNab/Braeside Committee of Adjustment is in receipt of a consent

application for lands located on Part Lot 21, Concession 12(B), 903 Archibald Street as shown

on the map below.

File No.: B-16/16Date: February 27”‘,2017Time: 7:00 p.m.Location: McNab/Braeside Township Municipal Of?ce

2508 Russett Drive, Amprior, Ontario K7S 3G8

PURPOSE AND EFFECT OF THE PROPOSED APPLICATIONThe proposed severed parcel has a frontage of 3l.O9m on Archibald Street, a depth of 30.48m

and area of .095 ha. The proposed retained parcel has a frontage of 3l.09m on Archibald Street,a depth of 30.48m and area of .095 ha. The proposed severed parcel is to be used for residentialpurposes.

NOTES REGARDING YOUR RIGHTSIf a person or public body that ?les an appeal of a decision of the Township of McNab/BraesideCommittee of Adjustment in respect of the proposed consent does not make written submissionsto the Township of McNab/Braeside Committee of Adjustment before it gives or refuses to givea provisional consent, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss the appeal. If you wish to benoti?ed of the decision of the Committee of Adjustment in respect of the proposed consent, you

must make a written request to:

Township of McNab/Braeside Committee of Adjustment2508 Russett Drive, R.R. 2Arnprior, OntarioK7S 3G8

FOR MORE INFORMATIONAdditional information is available for inspection at the municipal of?ce by contacting Helen

Siroski at 613-623-5756 ext. 231 Or by e—mailat [email protected] quoting ?lenumber B-16/16.

SUBJECT PROPERTY

‘i . Proposed severed

parcel

2

iv

“It O

of 51

TOWNSHIPOF MCNAB/BRAlESIDESEWAGE SYSTEMINSPECTOR COMMENTS

forCONSENTAPPLICATIONS

Date: Z6’/'2To: Committee of Adjustment

From: Sewage System Inspector

Re: Private Sewage Disposal

Consent Application No: 1%Owner/Applicant: L/I cI»va/\/76‘/‘car:«"3 .

_

Location: /ZZZ”) 7/3

X‘ I APPROVE the suitability of the above severed & retained lands for private sewagedisposal.

I DO NOT APPROVE the suitability of the above severed & retained lands for privatesewage disposal.

COMMENTS:

/£5-éuziér?//ti¢§5c’,>’V>'”/Lcv’««7</,9/J5’//4,,/’/4:4 CZ»; ?e»

'%¢ir fig/’/a74c5&4<’74e¢\Om 5.5;‘/*”"’é//‘_//X/IJ"

Slfv?gercc: Clerk Township Office

of 51

Development & PropertyDepartmentRenfi"’¢'§‘\’I\‘7

Ontario . Canada CONSENT PLANNING REPORT£xpe1*£ence0MrH1l:%ar}/,1/m.re0u.rFao£-Lore!

TOWNSHIP OF McNab/Braeside . , .

D _ .-.._ ». ..PART A - BACKGROUND ‘ms-.l:CEll~/

a:D1. FILE NO.: B-16/16

2. APPLICANT: Ian McKieJoan McKie

3. MUNICIPALITY: Township of McNab/Braeside(geographic Township of McNab/Braeside)

_ _ _ 903 Archibald Street4. LOT. 21 CON.. 12(A) STREET.

912 Archibald Street

5. PURPOSE: Lot addition from 903 Archibald Street to Lot 34 Plan 211

Severed Retained NotBelflloAdded

6. OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE_

TWP OF McNAB[BRAESIDE Rural Rural RuralOfficial Plan Designation(s):

7. ZONING BY-LAW OF THETWP OF McNAB[BRAESIDE RU RU RU(2010-49) Zone (5):

8. SITE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS:

Progosed Zoning By—law Progosed Zoning BylawLot Area Reguirement Lot Frontage Requirement

S d(W§)’f9g§Ama[dSt)950 m2 4047 m2 31.09 m 45 m

Total, ifLot Addition 1395 m2 4047 m2 31.09 m 45 m(912 Archibald St)

Retamed 950 m2 4047 m2 31 09 m 45 m(E1/2 903 Archibald St)

'

9. SEVERANCE HISTORY

E:lr:i::r(cil:3r;il3Vlots from orlglnal No previous severances

10. BUILT—UPAREA Yes No X

of 51

(8)

(b)

(C)

(a)

(b)

PART B - COMMENTS

CONFORMITY WITH OFFICIAL PLAN

The proposal conforms with the Official Plan, based on the information availableto this Department.

The proposal will conform with the Official Plan if/when,(Sec. Nos. )

FILE NO.

Under Sections 3.3(5)(e) and 15.2(2) an Official Plan Amendment isimplemented to permit undersized lots.

The proposal does not meet the intent of the Official Plan because,

CONFORMITY WITH ZONING BY-LAW

The proposal appears to meet the requirements of the Zoning By-law.

B-16/16

The severed/retained portion/overall proposal would contravene the By—lawbecause,

- Under Section 17.2(a) and (b) the resulting enlarged and retained lots will beless than 4047 square metres in area and have less than 45 metres roadfrontage.

- Under Section 3.15.4 lot enlargements to an undersized lot cannot create anundersized lot.

PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT and MUNICIPAL PLAN REVIEW DATA

No Concerns

Explanation of Concerns:

Concerns X

1.6.6.4 Individual on—site water and sewage services may be used provided siteconditions are suitable for the |ong—term with no negative impacts.

2.2.1(h) Planning authorities shall protect, improve or restore the quality andquantity of water by ensuring stormwater management practicesminimize stormwater volumes and contaminant loads, and maintain orincrease the extent of vegetative and pervious surfaces.

3.1.6subject to the appropriate floodproo?ng to the flooding hazardelevation

Development and site alteration shall be permitted in the flood fringe,

of 51

FILE NO. B-16/16

GENERAL PLANNING COMMENTS

The subject lands are located in an area consisting of numerous, small residentialwaterfront lots on the north side of Archibald Street and a few small second-tier lots onthe south side of Archibald Street. These developed lots are located within the floodfringe of the Ottawa River. To the southeast of the second-tier lots is a large area oflow-lying lands within the floodway of the Ottawa River.

The McKle’s own two properties on Archibald Street across from one another. Bothexisting properties are considered undersized by today's zoning standards. The purposeof this application is a reconfiguration of the two properties resulting in two propertiesthat will still be undersized.

The owners are proposing to sever the west half of 903 Archibald Street which containsan accessory building and add it to 912 Archibald Street, across the road that fronts onthe Ottawa River and also contains an accessory building. A development agreementregistered on title will be required to ensure that the two parcels making up theenlarged lot are always dealt with as a single legally conveyable lot. The existingaccessory building, on the severed lot, is proposed to be removed and replaced with anew dwelling. The retained lot, being the east half of 903 Archibald Street, will containtwo existing dwellings. The second dwelling on the retained lot will continue to bepermitted as long as it exists.

As identified in Part B-Section 3 of this Report, Provincial planning issues affecting thisproposed Of?cial Plan amendment relate to waterfront development that is bothappropriate and safe and that adequately addresses negative impacts on naturalfeatures.

An Official Plan amendment and zoning by-law amendment have been applied for by theapplicants. Official Plan Amendment No. 10 will allow the lot addition and recognize theresulting undersized recon?gured lots. The Zoning By-law amendment will address thereduced lot areas and lot frontages on Archibald Street. It is recommended that the lotareas and frontages of the severed lands, the lot being added to and retained lands areconfirmed by an Ontario Land Surveyor for insertion into the amending by-law so itreflects the correct lot areas and frontages. The amendment will also address a reducedbuilding setback from the centreline of the street for the new dwelling. Lastly, thezoning by-law amendment will also prohibit any new development on the waterfrontportion of the enlarged lot and permit the existing building located there to be used onlyfor storage purposes.

The application is supported by favourable water quality testing results for 903Archibald Street and a Conceptual Septic System Plan prepared by Houle ChevrierEngineering, for the new proposed dwelling. In keeping with Provincial policy, the

L0

of 51

(8)

(b)

(C)

(d)

FILE NO. B-16/16

Official Plan, Zoning By-law, the new dwelling will be required to be adequatelyfloodproofed. Floodproofing elevations will be required at the time of building permitapproval. Favourable comments will be required from the Township's Chief BuildingOfficial/Sewage Inspector regarding the suitability of the lots for development.

The bene?t of the lot recon?guration is that new development will only be permitted onthe portion of the reconfigured lot that is on the south side of Archibald Street (awayfrom the water). New development will be prohibited on the waterfront portion andonly storage will be permitted in the existing accessory building. The result will be newdevelopment set further back from the Ottawa River which in turn reduces negativeimpacts on water quality of the river and potential flood damage to buildings andstructures.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Planning concerns have NOT been identified in this report. Therefore,consent may be appropriate if supported by Council and the agencies.

There are some planning concerns which Council should deal with as follows,before deciding whether to support the consent.

The proposal may be acceptable when the following matters are addressed Xand resolved:

Of?cial Plan Amendment No. 10 is finalized permitting a lot additionseverance that will result in two undersized lots.

A zoning by-law amendment is finalized that addresses the zoning matters setout in Section 4 of this Report.

An Ontario Land Surveyor con?rms the lot areas and frontages of the severedlands, retained lands and lot being added to.

A development agreement is required to legally tie together the two parcels ofland comprising the enlarged lot.

Favourable comments are received from the Township's Chief Building Officialregarding the suitability of the lots for development.

Conditions to the giving of consent should be considered for the following:

L7. Registered Plan of Survey Preceded W a draft SUl‘VeY

X Zoning By-law Amendment:

Minor Variance:

of 51

FILE NO. B-16/16

Private Road Agreement:

To tie the two parcels together (across theroad) that comprises the enlarged lot.

Development Agreement:

Site Plan Control Agreement:

Notice on Title:

Shoreline Road Allowance Closure /Acquisition:

Other:

(9) There are serious planning concerns, refusal is recommended.

(f) Other Recommendations: X

That the proposed Of?cial Plan Amendment be approved prior to the grantingof the consent.

Date: January 24, 2017

_ Bruce Howarth, MCIP, RPPPlanner.

Senior PlannerJan 2017

of 51

T.TOi

mm9.30

u_._O0

GE

CIV

MI

cm>

m_uE

_n_.

..«

of 51

mw

:u_>_

v‘A

\8

So

cm8

&N

0:E

ms.

>m

m w.>

uuo_._m_

of 51

February 14, 2017

Report


From: Angela Young, Deputy Clerk

Date:

Subject: Site Plan Application - KANSC Consulting Ltd.

Recommendation

THAT The Planning Advisory Committee recommends that the County of Renfrew Operations Committee reconsiders the condition as submitted by Mr. M. Pinet requiring land for future road reconstruction and upgrades at 1716 Calabogie Road.

Background

As part of the process for a site plan agreement application at 1716 Calabogie Road, the County of Renfrew Public Works Department was circulated for comments as this development was on a county road. Mr. Pinet - Manager of Infrastructure has indicated that as a condition of site plan approval that the applicant convey lands to the County of Renfrew for future road reconstruction and upgrades.

Item # 1 - Correspondence from County of Renfrew

Item #2 - Correspondence from M.W. Instance, Solicitor for Kansc Consulting

Discussion

In looking at this property the applicant was concerned about the requirement as part of site plan agreement process to provide land along the front of his property to the County of Renfrew for road widening. The proximity of Blackbird and Neat Cafe the two properties would make it impossible for the expansion of this corridor without a demolition of either or both of the structures.

It is noted this is a former provincial highway downloaded in the late 1990's and obviously the province during the construction and subsequent upgrade(s) to former 508 must have concluded the expansion would not be feasible and did not request the property at the time.

The Applicants well is located in close proximity to existing roadway. To remove the requested property would place his well head within the 15 metre zone which is not recommended under the Ministry documents governing proximity to contaminents.

of 51

February 14, 2017

People Consulted

CAO/Clerk

CBO

Director of Public Works


Angela Young, Deputy Clerk

of 51

9 INTERNATIONALDRIVE

PEMBROKE,ON, CANADAC t fRenf ’°

. 613—732»4353Department of Public FAX:613_732_0087

Works & Engineering Experienceaw HA‘?-my,.r/mre OM Frame! www_cOunIyofrenfrew’On_ca

January 3,2017

Ms. Angela YoungTownship of McNab/Braeside2508 Russett DriveAmprion 0N K75368 TWP.orMCNABIBRAESI

DE‘‘

RE: Site Plan Application - Preliminary Comments

Applicant: KANSCConsulting Ltd.Location: 1716 Calabogie Road (County Road 508)

' .\n{;'/I-;ao{~”izmzi

JAN“*97.Ull

We have reviewed the documents received as well as your email of December 8, 2016 withregards to a site plan application at the above noted location.

Our records indicate that the current road allowance width, measured from the centreline of

County Road 508 is approximately 8.5 — 9.0 metres. The County's preferred road allowance

width is 13.0 metres from centreline which would allow for future road reconstruction and

upgrades. We will require as a condition of site plan approval that the applicant conveys to theCounty of Renfrew the lands within 13.0 metres of the centreline of County Road 508 at no cost

to the County of Renfrew. A copy of County Policy No. PW-12 has been included for your

review. We would draw your attention to page 3 of the document — "Commercial and IndustrialDevelopments”.

The site plan is to be updated to show the following items:

Location and dimensions of existing entrances.

Diameter and length of existing entrance culverts.

Building setbacks from existing property boundary.

Location of existing fence.Location of existing signage.

Allsignage is to be located/relocatedon private property.

Thankyou for the opportunity to comment on this application. Should you have any questions

regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Nathan Kuiackof this

office.

Yours truly,

77/w@MichaelC. Pinet, FEC,P.Eng.

Manager of [email protected]. (PW-12)

of 51

HUCKABONE- O'BRIEN - INSTANCE- BRADLEY- LYLE-LLP

L A W Y E R S

F.AllanHuckabone, Q.C. (Retired) DelbertA. O'Brien,Q.C., JurisD. (Retired) WilliamInstance

Matthew1.Bradley Tracy Lyle MarkHuckabone

JessicaFuller

January 31, 2017 E-Mail:w'[email protected] Line: 613-735-2345

Ext. 322

Corporationof the County of Renfrew_

Attention: Nathan Kuiack, Department Of Public Works And Engineering9 InternationalDrivePembroke,Ontario

,

.' ‘\_\iw/I

if .11Dear Mr. Kuiack:

RE: SITE PLAN APPLICATIONAPPLICANT — KANSC CONSULTING LTD.LOCATION - 1716 CALABOGIE ROAD(COUNTY ROAD 508)

Please be advised that I act on behalf of Laurent Coulibaly who is the owner of the above noted

property. Mr. Coulibaly appliedto the Municipality for a Building Permit to allow for an addition

to the existing building. The Township requesteda Site Plan and as such looked to you for input.

Mr. Coulibalyhas providedme witha copy of the letter datedJanuary 3, 2017 whichyou sent to the

Municipalityto the attentionof Angela Young. This letter recommendedthat Mr. Coulibalybe

required to transfer to the County approximately4.5 metres for a road widening. You also

recommendedthat the cost of this conveyance, including surveying,would be at Mr. Coulibaly’s

expense.

My clienttakes the position that a roadwidening in these circumstances is not necessary or advisable

and even if it were should not be at his expense. We would point out the following:

1. The property is already zoned Commercialand the zoning would remain the same.

2. We are not applyingfor a severance which is quite often what triggers a road widening.

3. My client is not asking for a new entrance to the property. There is an existing entrance

whichwill continueto be used.

284 PembrokeStreet East, P.O. Box 487, Pembroke, Ontario K8A6X7 ~ Tel: 613v735—2341- Fax: 613-735-0920 or 613-735-3547www.hso|awyers.com

of 51

January31, 2017Page?;

4. My client has submitted a parking plan to the Municipality. If the road widening wasrequired, a number of parking places would be lost and my client’s plan would no longermeet the Municipal Zoning By-Law for parking spaces,

5. My client is not constructing a new buildingbut simplyan additionto an existing building.

6. My clienthas done some rough measurements with respect to the properties on eithersideof his property. On one side is the Blackbird Cafe’which building is, by Mr. Coulibaly’sestimate,5.8 metres from the road. On the other side is the Neat Café. The Neat Cafe isapparentlyapproximately3.8 metres from the road. It would seem unlikely that any roadwidening would be possible in front of these two properties and, as such, it would be ourview that it would not make sense to require a road widening of our client.

7. Your letterhad indicatedthat all costs wouldbe born by Mr. Coulibalyincludingsurvey andconveyancing costs. If the road widening is required, and we wish to make it clear that wedo not believe it is, it would be our Viewthat the costs shouldbe born by the Countyas it isthe Countythat is seeking the road widening.

We wouldask that you reconsider your position with respect to the request for a road widening. Welook forward to hearing from you in this regard. Thank you for your time.

Yours very truly,

//J" ~.

M.W. Instance

MWI/ceeCopy: Mr. Coulibaly

Ms. Angela Young

of 51

MandyCannon

Subject: FW: Budget projects

From: Mark MacKenzieSent: Tuesday, January 10,2017 8:59 PMTo: Lindsey Parkes <[email protected]>Subject: Fw: Budget projects

Hello Lindsey, could you enter this as correspondence for rest of Council.

Many thanks

Mark MacKenzieCouncillorTownship of McNab/Braeside2508 Russet Drive,R.R. 2, Arnprior, Ontario K78 3G8Office: (613)623-5756Fax: (613) 623-9138Cell: (613)852-2371email: mmack§g@@mcnabbraeside.com

This E—mailmay contain privileged and confidentialinformationintended on/yfor the individual or entity named in the

message. Ifthe reader ofthis message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended

recipient, you are hereby notifiedthat any review, dissemination, distribution or copying ofthis communication is

prohibited. ifthis communication was received in error, please notify us by reply E—mailand delete the original message.

From: Aldene Styles <ast lesOO mail.com>

Sent: Tuesday, January 10,2017 3:12 PM

To: Mark MacKenzieSubject: Budgetlprojects

Please share this email with the rest of council.

As a former Councillor for the Township of McNab/BraesideI agree with Councillor MacKenzie with his

reasons for not putting over a million dollars into a building at the RACentre in Braeside. There are too many

other buildings that can be justified to be replaced, such as the Municipal Office. The present building reachedit capacity long ago and previous councils did not bite the bullet to replace it.

The main reason I voted for the purchase of the Perneel land was to locate a new municipal building on the

site once the land was paid for. The need is there for a hall/meeting room beside the Council Chambers to

accommodate overflow when meetings attract a large crowd. Storage of files has also been a challenge do to

lack of space. These are only a couple of examples but there are many more as you should know.

So my advice is spent the money wisely on needs NOT wants of a few.

Regards

of 51

MandyCannon

Subject: FW: 2017 BudgetAttachments: DOCO10317—O1032017122444.pdf

From: Mark MacKenzie [mailto:counclllor@markmackenzieca]Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:06 PMTo: Lindsey Parkes <l arkes mcnabbraeside.com>Subject: Fwd: 2017 Budget

Hello Lindsey, could you enter this as correspondence.

Thanks!

Mark MacKenzieCouncillorTownship of McNab/Braeside2508 Russet Drive,R.R. 2, Arnprior, Ontario K75 3G8Cell: (613) 852-2371Home: (613) 623-1569email: counci||[email protected]

[email protected]

This E—mailmay contain privileged and confidentialinformationintended onlyfor the individual or entity named in the

message. Ifthe reader ofthis message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intendedrecipient, you are hereby notifiedthat any review, dissemination, distribution or copying ofthis communication is

prohibited. Ifthis communication was received in error, please notify us by reply E—maiIand delete the original message.

-------- -- Foiwarded message --------—-

From: Scott McEwan <mcewan(a}mcewanhomes.com>Date: Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:30 PMSubject: RE: 2017 BudgetTo: Mark MacKenzie <c0uncil1or [L markmackenzie.ca>

Hi Mark

I don't mind you sharing my thoughts but they areiust that, my thoughts, I'm certainly not an expert. My opinions are formed by

what I have witnessed in my years of visiting the existing center and the number of people attending.

I have attached a very rough drawing making the hallway into a shared community area, a little smaller than what the main hall was.

It does take away from the formal renting out of the main hall but does put the precedent back on the community sharing the

building for events and reducing the building size tremendously.

Before you share IJustwanted to clear up my grammar:

Couple of my thoughts:

I think the proposed Braeside building is to large and costly, I believe it could be cut back to about ‘/2the size by reconfiguring the

hallway and bathrooms, depending on the desired use.

1

of 51

I think the designers have the right idea but have missed on what the building is actually used for and the amount of people that

actually attend events.

I think by tweaking the drawings as l have done will lower the costs dramatically and will still serve the community. Granted more

thought can be put into the drawings but it is a smaller alternative, still allowing room for 60 to 70 people to gather, That shouldsuffice for the card games and shanty breakfasts that are held there now.

The biggest decision one must consider, is the purpose ofthe building, I understand that we are talking recreation however is it

councils intention to generate revenue by renting out the facility to third parties or is this a gift to the community to use forrecreational pleasure.

One must only look at the struggles of the Parish hall, the curling club and perhaps the NickSmith Centre when it comes to trying to

rent these halls, they I'm sure are all paid for and still struggle to break even in this rental space. Important to remember in all of theabove examples is that none of these venues Kitchens are up to standards of a new build like M/Bis undertaking, if we are talking

food preparation the costs for the kitchen will be huge.

The next issue is that the bar area must be handled in house, through the municipality. Without a bar patrons to events do not

come. It has been years since any of the rental facilities above have allowed 3'“ party tenants to run their own bars, the insurance

liabilities are too great. Is the municipality ready to take on the responsibility of a bar, if not and you are intending to rent out thisfacility for profit, that is a huge strike against. With a hall rented the bar is a money maker but who is going to take responsibility for

it, you are outside of Arnprior, people have to get home.

M/Bis very lucky to have a private owner of the Sand Point Golf Club, one that has spent a fortune over the past two years providing

the municipality with something it was badly in need of, a beautiful, state of the art reception Hall ready to house the many

weddings and receptions that our rate payers were taking out of our municipality. A much nicer space than a concrete block hall and

they have meals for all budgets and take on the responsibility for a bar. The Golf Course also has a smaller room downstairs to take

on smaller events, again with food budgets for all and again they run the bar.

Mountain Creek also is an owner occupied business that has a large room that holds weddings and parties, again with prices for all

budgets.

Is the Township considering, in a municipal paid for building, competing against their own tax paying businesses.

Does the kitchen in this 1.8 million dollar budget allow for food preparation, who is going to deal with the health department and

maintain an expensive kitchen that can remain dormant for weeks or months on end.

Without allowing 3"‘party renters to serve their own alcohol it becomes harder and harder for them to not only make money but to

break even on their events. Renters now have to rely on ticket sales for paying for the hall rental and food served to their attendees.Organizers no longer want that risk, why not hold the event at a place like the golf course that will supply the hall, food and the

liquor and all ticket sales are profit.

Both Golf Courses have beautiful areas for pictures after the wedding and Sand Point has actually cut some areas into the trees and

include stone bridges and rock benches for the bride and grooms pictures, it is a business, I suggest the Braeside RA cannot provide

these picturesque areas.

I think the questions that council has to ask itself is:

l . What do we want from this building

a. Community events

b. Retirement parties

c. Birthdays

d. Etc.

2. Or revenue, if council is looking to bring revenue out of this building, what is it realistic.

2

of 51

L.)

if Council is looking to have revenue out of this building how is it proposing to do so.

‘:1. ice and Building rentals? How much can you charge?

b4 Are people going to settle for the run down boards around the arena or are they going to be upgraded to draw in more

people.

.0

Is council going to provide people to clean the ice between parties or are they going to continue to rely on volunteers to

clean the ice(1. The diamonds are alright but not to the quality that exist in Arnprior, are we going to pay to upgrade the diamonds to try

and bring more people here.

e. For hall rentals, wedding, receptions etc. What do you charge?

4. Or is this a building for the people in this area to gather and stay warm when they or their kids are skating and to

congregate for small parties and local breakfasts like the firemen‘s breakfast raising funds for the department, and if so

should or does the hall have to be this big.

1.8 million is $ 54,000.00 in interest a year at 3 % interest, you will need an employee at the place at least half days for cleaning and

up keep, $ 25,000.00 a year, heat and Hydro, a minimum of$ 15,000.00 more than you pay now. About S94,000.00 per year or$7,833.33 per month.

Pretty tough to justify those numbers when you rent the hall out if even twice a month at$ 500.00 a night.

Just one more point, other places that can and are designed to hold events do, if you are eating and drinking your evening away, will

even pay for the entertainment to help seal the deal at their business.

It all comes down to what the vision for this building is, do I think a new building is justified yes, do I think it needs to be this big, no.

Once you have the building built and you have went smaller you can always add on ifthe need is there, once you build the building

to the size now indicated and if it sits empty you still have the construction cost and maintenance for years to come.

Just my thoughts.

Scott McEwan

McEwan Homes

Tel: 613 623-6589

Fax: 613 623-2526

www.mcewanhomes.com

of 51

1_~m

_.=

s_z>

z<

29.

Ex

nazm

?cna

uz

zms

mm

>m

m6m

m>

nmz?

mm

z>m

m_o

m. O

Z

?

mo:

m:>

.:nP

oo»

VF

»:

D1m

m:<

mm

<s

E

of 51

February 14, 2017

Report


From: Ryan Frew, Director of Public Works and Property Manager


Subject: Braeside RA Centre Layout

Recommendation

THAT the Planning Advisory Committee recommends layout _____ as provided by Greenview Environmental be brought forward to the February 21 Regular meeting of Council for approval and that design development commences for this project.


Ryan Frew, Director of Public Works and Property Manager

of 51

PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

SC-03b

FENCE LINE (BALL DIAMOND)

RINK BOARDS

BUILDING AREA: 400m2 (4300ft2)

of 51

PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

SC-03c

FENCE LINE (BALL DIAMOND)

RINK BOARDS

BUILDING AREA: 400m2 (4300ft2)

of 51

The Township Of McNab/Braeside

Documents

Transcript of The Township Of McNab/Braeside