The Supportive Care Oncology Network Northeast Region: Moving Forward, Improving the Patient...
-
Upload
corey-bates -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of The Supportive Care Oncology Network Northeast Region: Moving Forward, Improving the Patient...
The Supportive Care Oncology Network Northeast Region: Moving Forward, Improving the
Patient Experience Utilizing Screening for Distress
Northern Health Research ConferenceNorthern Ontario School of MedicineJune 4 - 5, 2010 – Sudbury, Ontario
Sheila Damore-Petingola, MSW, RSWCoordinator Supportive Care Oncology Network-NE
Carole Mayer, Ph.D. (C), MSW, RSWProgram Leader & Administrative ManagerSupportive Care Program & Supportive Care Oncology Research Unit
Acknowledgements• Director of Epidemiology
– Mike Conlon, PhD
• Research Officers– Michelle Lessard– Katherine MacKenzie
• Funding Partners– Canadian Partnership Against Cancer-Cancer
Journey Action Group– Northern Cancer Research Foundation
Presentation Outline• Context
– Supportive Care Oncology Network-NE– Community Oncology Clinic Network
• Project Overview– Principals applied – Stakeholder engagement– Respecting cultural diversity– Participatory Action Research framework– Plan the delivery of psychosocial services– Implement an evaluation plan
• Conclusion
Context• The Regional Cancer Program - tertiary
cancer centre for cancer services in Northeastern Ontario
• The Supportive Care Program - meeting the psychosocial needs of patients and families affected by cancer
• The Supportive Care Oncology Network-Northeast Region (SCON-NE) – ensuring access to supportive care services in NEO
• Screening for Distress Project
James Bay
Cochrane
Kapuskasing
Timmins
Sudbury Sault Ste. Marie Elliot Lake
Sturgeon Falls
North Bay
New Liskeard
Kirkland Lake
Parry SoundMindemoya
Quebec
Blind River
Lake Superior
Lake Michigan Lake
Huron
U.S.A.
Northwestern Ontario
Chapleau
Huntsville
Bracebridge
Community Oncology Clinic
Network (COCN)
NE Local Health Integration
Network (LHIN-13)
LHIN-13
Expanding Screening for Distress in NEO
Educating health care professionals at the Community Oncology Clinic sites in NEO– Identifying patient distress– Quantifying the distress with validated
instruments – screening– Responding to distress by initiating
appropriate referrals for assessment and intervention
Distress as the 6th vital sign
TemperatureRespirationHeart rateBlood PressurePainDistress
-Screening is usually done to prevent disease
-Vital signs taken on ongoing basisScreening for Distress Workshop March 2008
ESASScreening Domains
Score 0-3
Score 4-6
Score 7-10
Severity of Scores
CPAC-Implementing Screening for Distress, the 6 th Vital Sign, 2009
Psychosocial
Practical
Physical
Problem Checklist (minimal data set)
PracticalWork/SchoolFinancesGetting to and from appointmentsAccommodationLegalChildcare
EmotionalFears/WorriesSadnessFrustration/AngerChanges in AppearanceIntimacy/Sexuality
InformationalUnderstanding my illness and/or treatmentTalking with the health care teamMaking treatment decisionsKnowing about available resourcesAwareness of traditional healing practices
Social/FamilyFeeling a burden to othersWorry about friends/familyFeeling alone
SpiritualMeaning/Purpose of lifeFaith
PhysicalConcentration/memorySleepWeight
Please check all of the following items that have been a concern or problem foryou in the past week including today:
CPAC-Implementing Screening for Distress, the 6 th Vital Sign, 2009
What is proposed for this project
• Who to Screen: All patients receiving chemotherapy at a COCN site (14 sites)
• When to Screen: First day for each cycle of chemotherapy
• How to Screen: Using computerized method when possible; other option paper copy
• Screening domains: Psychosocial, practical and physical
• Tool selection: ESAS and Canadian Problem Checklist
Stakeholder Engagement• Support from senior administrators from the
Regional Cancer Program (RCP)– Building on current mandate within the RCP and
Cancer Care Ontario (CCO)– Meeting the Canadian Council on Health Services
Accreditation standards• Workshop held in May 2009 with National
Leaders for COCN site managers and nurses• Engaging each COCN site through site visits• Selecting champions• Building a Working Committee
Respecting Cultural Diversity• Demographic and Health Profile for NE - LHIN
– Higher proportion of Aboriginals/First Nations/Métis than Ontario as a whole, 10% and 2% respectively
– Higher proportion of Francophones compared to Ontario as a whole, 24% and 4% respectively
(Population Profile at a Glance – NE LHIN http://www.nelhin.on.ca)
• Working Committee representation• Demographic questionnaire for each patient
being screened• All forms available in English and French
Participatory Action Research (PAR)
• Equalizing power imbalances in the project—seeking participants’ input
• Research process involves taking notice of the findings at different stages of the research which informs actions to be taken throughout the process (Nelson et al., 1998)
Plan the Delivery of Psychosocial Oncology Services at 14 COCN Sites
• Identification of resources within communities– Community hospitals– Community Care Access Centre
• Building a safety net– Use of telemedicine
• Provision of education and discussion forums– Eg. May 14/2010 workshop
• Next step– Developing referral pathways
EvaluationSupportive Care Oncology Research Unit
• Demographic form
• ESAS Scores
• Canadian Problem Checklist
• Nursing outcome form
• Completion of project March 31, 2011
Current Status of the Project• Workshop – Introduce the Project - May 2009• COCN Site Visits
– Sept-Oct 2009– Jan-May 2010
• Monthly Working Committee meetings– Initial meeting Oct 2009
• Workshop – May 2010 - to advance understanding of:– supportive care resources in NEO– national algorithms and guidelines in addressing distress
• All 14 COCN sites implemented screening – Nov 16, 2009 – June 1, 2010
Conclusion
• Implementing a standard of care to meet the psychosocial needs of cancer patients receiving treatment closer to home
• Learning from our COCN sites
• Team work, team work, team work!