The “story” of RIMAP: From a research project over CWA to ... · PDF fileAPI 581...
Transcript of The “story” of RIMAP: From a research project over CWA to ... · PDF fileAPI 581...
The “story” of RIMAP: From a research project over CWA to EN
and global market … and iNTeg-Risk (FP7)!
A. JovanovicSteinbeis Advanced Risks Technologies, Germany
R. KauerTÜV Süd, Germany
M. Renner Bayer Technology Services, Germany
Seminar Standardisation in Research and Innovation“Practical tools for the dissemination and
implementation of research results” November 10, 2011, Brussels
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
RIMAP –what is (was!) it?
A joint European research project for a sy stematic procedure to manage risk by identifying and prioritising inspection and maintenance activities
• Establish a European framework for risk basedinspection and maintenance planning (cf. API project)
• Provide basis for continuous improvement in the industry • Forming the basis for future standardisation in this area
RIMAPRisk based Inspection and Maintenance Procedures for European industry
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
RIMAP –project goals
Develop a unified approach to risk based inspection and maintenance planning
Setting requirements to the contents of an analysis, personnel qualifications and tools
Improve cost effectiveness of inspection and maintenance resources
Considers both SHE and business risk -current practice tends to focus on safety
Systematic use of experience data
Industry: Beat US on the global RBI market!
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
RIMAP -Large industry participation
Chemical
DOW
YARA(HydroAgri)
Solvay
Petrochemical
ExxonMobil
Steel
Corus
Power
EnBW
ESB
Siemens,
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
RIMAP -consultants & R&D participation
Consultants
Bureau Veritas
Det Norske Veritas
Mitsui-BabcockTechnology Centre
TÜV Süddeutschland
Research institutes
Joint Research Centre
MPA
Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT)
TNO
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
RIMAP Project(s)
3 projects:
RTD(development)
Demonstration
Network
startMarch 2001
endMarch 2005 O b s e r v e r s (includes e.g. EPERC TTF3)
CENWorkshopAgreement
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
RIMAPDemo
RIMAP Documentation Level I RIMAP Framework
RIMAPDocumentationLevel II
RIMAP Tools
RIMAPDocumentationLevel III RIMAPApplicationWorkbooks
Damagemecha-nisms
NDTeffi-
ciency
Probabilityof Failure
(PoF)
Consequenceof Failure
(CoF)
RIMAP ToolsOverview Document
Reports from demonstration and application cases
RIMAP Procedure
RIMAPprin-ciples
HumanFactors
Petrochemical Steel ChemicalPower Off-shore
Benchmarking
Inspection planning and optimization
Appendices
RIMAP Documents
CENWorkshopAgreement
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
CEN CWA 15740:2008
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
Page 9
API 510Pressure Vessel
inspection
API 570Piping
inspection
API 653Tank
inspection
API 750ProcessHazards
Supporting documents& reports
for specificissues
API 581Risk-BasedInspection
API 579Fitness forPurpose
(not finished!)
Basic(resource)
documents& reports
API 581RBI recommended
practice
API 581RBI recommended
practice(Lite Version - draft!)
Evaluation &Implementation
recommendations& documents
APIRBI-relateddocuments
European vs. US docs:CEN CWA 15740:008 …s
API580
API580
CWA 15740:2008RIMAP Workbooks
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
Applied with revenues –e.g. Germany … e.g. 25 k€/year
Nuclear power station
Fossil fuel station
Hydroelectric power station
Illerpower stations
Ulm
Heilbronn
Marbach
Stuttgart
Karlsruhe
Philippsburg
Baden-Baden
Forbach
Freiburg
Neckarwestheim
Obrigheim
Bexbach(Saarland)
Cattenom(France)
Mannheim
Lippendorf(Saxony)
EnAlpinWallis(Switzerland)
Fessenheim(France)
Sellrain-Silz(Austria)
Upper Danube power stations
Neckarpower stations
Rhine power stations(CERGA/RKI)
Upper Rhine power stations
Schluchsee power stations
EnBW operated
EnBW operated
EnBW operated
VorarlbergerIllwerke(Austria)
Walheim
Altbach
Glems
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
Main result: savings + inspection planSavings: Know what is NOT to be inspected
••••••••••
••••••••••
••••••••••
••
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
••••••••••• • • • • • •••••••••••
•••••••••• • • • •••••••••••
Gains
Losses
Components with MAX gain in NPV when inspected
Components with practically NO gain in NPV when inspected
Component with LOSSES in NPV no matter inspected or
not
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
Not really!
CWA was the vehicle for the “life beyond the end of the project” and
The “RIMAP double funnel”!
That was the end of the project…
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
RIMAP Funnel #1: EU consensus in CWA
Different EU Solutions
Agreedsolutions per
industrysector
RIMAPHandbooks
SoftwareImplementation
CWA
Launch to market
2005
Industry inputs (“open innovation”)
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
RIMAP (inverse) Funnel #2: Business success supported by CWA/EN
RIMAPbased
products(e.g. TÜV,
DNV,R-Tech)
Launch to market
CWA
2011
RIMAP based services
(e.g. China, Japan, Brazil,
Malaysia,South Africa,
Russia / Gazprom, …)
RIMAPbasedprofe-ssional
education(e.g.
SteinbeisUniver-
isty)
RIMAPbased
audits & certifi-cation(e.g.
Bayer)
RIMAPbasedmulti-client
projects(RBI Atlas)
~ 100 M€
~ 100 M€
~ 2,000 persons
???
~ 200 contri-butors
CWA >> EN
Profits & savingsImproved safety
New projects, e.g. iNTeg-Risk
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
It’s never early enough!
Do not forget costs! Who can afford the “luxury of making a standard”?
Do not underestimate difficult communications process!
Who is “Finland”, “France”, “Germany” … ?
Optimize “your own” standardization with existing TCs! … the people there might be not your people, THEY have paid already
HAVE the standardization as a part of the business plan! … no matter how much FIXED money you plan for it, it will be spent sooner or later. Only a running business can support, a really active running standardization process…
Lessons learned
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
Only a running business can support, a really active running standardization process…
… in RIMAP the consortium “delegated” it to a new partner (Steinbeis Advanced Risk Technologies GmbH) and in subsequent projects we had upfront!
MAIN Lesson learned
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
iNTeg-Risk project: Basic data
integration
Early Recognition, Monitoring and Integrated Management of Emerging, New Technology Related Risks
New Technologiese(mergin)g risks
0 0 8 – 0 1 3 g e€19,3 million80+ companies ( EDF, GDF-SUEZ, DNV, TÜV, SwissRe, HSE/HSL, DTU, VTT, … )400+ persons5 Subprojects40+ WPs200+ Tasks150+ Deliverables
Main deliverables:Detailed Analysis of 17 applications of emerging risks related to new technologies (CCS, nano, unmanned … “EU Common Approach” > Framework6 pre-standardization documents (CEN)Tools for Emerging Risks
RiskAtlas currently: ~200 layersRiskEars (Early Warning System currently:~800 notionsIndicators KPIs, SPIs, RFs… currently:~2,000 KPIsSafetypedia (web-semantics tool)Single Tools: MCDM, ABM, …& more
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
iNTeg-Risk ERMF
19
ERMF(ISO 31000-likerepresen-tation)
ERMF(IRGC-likerepresen-tation)
•••••••• ••••••••••• •••••••••
•• ••••• •••••••• • • • • • • •
•••••••••••• •••••••••••• • • • • • •••
••••
••• • • • • • • • • • •
•••••••••• • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•••••••••••••••• •••••••••••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • •
•••••••• ••••••••••• •••••••••
•••••••• ••••••• • • • • • • • • • •
•••••••• ••••• • • • • • • • • •
•• ••••• •••••••• • • • • • • •
•• •••••••••••••• ••• • • • • • • • •
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • •
•• •••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••• • • • • • • • • • •
•• •••••••••••• •••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • •
•• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
Knowledge base (Safetypedia)
InteractiveDatabase of ERRAs
Database of KPIs
Interactive set of risk assessmentmodules and targetedapplication tools
Risk Atlas
…
(iNTeg-Risk as a) Tool for practical assessment
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES
1-Stop-Shop:Tradeoff in physical maps…
RiskAtlas
iNTeg-Risk
6 CEN Workshop Agreements in iNTeg-Risk
22
1. “General Emerging Risk Management Framework Guideline”Principles of the Emerging Risk Management F ramework (ERMF) are based on the results of iNTeg-Risk project which are combined with inputs from earlier projects.
2. “Emerging Risks in New Technologies”Common and integrated reference solutions for the management of emerging risks related to the development and the intensificatio n of new and advanced technologies.
3. “Emerging Risks in New Materials and Products”Common/agreed solutions for dealing with em erging risks in the area of new products and materials.
4. “Emerging Risks in New Production & Production Networks”Innovative solutions, reference documents, methods and tools for the handling of emerging risks within the area of new production technologies and production networks.
5. “Emerging Risk Policies”Innovative solutions, reference documents, methods and tools for the handling of emerging risks within the area of policies and decision-making.
6. “Emerging risks due to uncertainties in testing procedures”Reference solutions for integrated risk management of Emerging Risks due to uncertainties in testing procedures
iNTeg-Risk
CWA Business Plan
23
• First working meeting took place on November 9, 2010 in Brussels
• Kick-off Nov. 4, 2011, Brussels
• EU-VRi one of 3 Liaison partners of ISO 31000 / 31004
(other 2: UN/UNECE and US ASISwith 37,000 members)
German standardization body DIN as workshop secretariat