The Stellar IMF at High Redshift

Long Ago and far Away:

The Fossil Record in an External Galaxy

Rosemary Wyse

STScI, March 30, 2005

The Fossil Record

Stars of mass like the Sun live for the age of the Universe – studying low-mass old stars allows us to do Cosmology locally.

Complementary approach to direct study at high redshift.

Stars retain some memory of initial conditions – age, chemical abundances (modulo mass transfer), orbital angular momentum (modulo resonances, torques)

Clues from the Fossil Record

Resolved stars – Local

Group galaxies Star formation history Chemical evolution Merging history: for

which system have we derived SFH? Match CDM?

Stellar Initial mass function Today’s talk

Left : z=10, small haloes dominate. Red indicates possible site of star formation at this time (very dense regions). Right: Present time, many of the small haloes have merged into the model Milky Way halo; oldest stars found throughout the Milky Way and in satellites galaxies.

CDM simulation of the Local group Moore et al. 2001

6Mpc box 300kpc box

The IMF Long Ago & Far Away: Faint Stars in the UMi dSph Galaxy

Dwarf spheroidal in Ursa Minor is apparently dark-matter dominated, of very low surface brightness, and total luminosity equal to a globular cluster

Stars are all old, and metal-poor Fossil record of long-lived, low-mass stars

yields luminosity function via star counts High-mass IMF leaves signature in elemental

abundances of stars they enriched

A Typical Satellite Galaxy:

Leo I Dwarf spheroidal

Umi dSph is ~3 mag lower central surface brightnessand a factor of ten lower luminosity

The Ursa Minor Dwarf Spheroidal Distance ~ 70kpc Total luminosity ~ 3 x 105 LV, ~ that of a

globular cluster Central surface brightness ~ 25.5 V-mag/sq Stellar velocity dispersion ~ 10km/s Mass-to-V-band light ratio 10–70M /L,

significantly above a globular cluster (~ 2) Most stars are very old, as old as halo globulars Stars are metal-poor, [Fe/H] ~ –2 dex

Mateo 98; Kleyna et al 98, 01, 04; Bellazzini et al 02; Carrera et al 02; Palma et al 03; Gomez-Flechoso et al 03; Winnick 03

Stars in UMi dSph are OLD

Hernandez et al 00

Most stars formed at early times , 12Gyr ago, or redshifts > 2

Most stars in Umi dSph formed at redshift z ~ 2

= 0.7, M =0.3 = 0, M = 0.3

Faint Stellar Luminosity Function The dominant stellar population in the UMi dSph is

old and metal-poor, similar to a halo globular cluster, a system with no dark matter

Most robust result is direct comparison between luminosity function of stars in UMi dSph and in globular clusters of same age and metallicity, observed in same bandpasses, same telescope/

detector. Same stellar populations, equivalent to comparison of mass functions.

Deep Imaging with Hubble Space Telescope

Deep images of a field close to the centre of the Ursa Minor dwarf spheroidal (extant WFPC2 data); STIS as primary (optical LP filter), WFPC2 (V606 & I814) and NICMOS (NIC2/H) in parallel. ~30,000s total.

Off-field at 2—3 tidal radii, same exposure Globular clusters M15 ([Fe/H] ~ –2 dex) and

47 Tuc ([Fe/H] ~ –0.7 dex) with extant WFPC2 V & I, new data in STIS/LP and NIC2/H.

Wyse, Gilmore, Houdashelt, Feltzing, Hebb, Gallagher & Smecker-Hane 2002

V-band WFPC2 Umi dSph centerCrowding not an issue even at faint magnitudes (hindsight..)

WFPC2 V, V-I CMD plus selection for LFs

V606

All

Very few unresolved objects in off field meet and sharpness criteria. Broad colour range, little contamination of Umi dSph main sequence.

UMi dSph V-band LFM92

M15

50% completenessV=28.35 M606 =+9.1

V-band luminosity functions of UMi dSph and ofglobular clusters are indistinguishable.

Piotto et al 97;Shifted and renormalised

UMi dSph I-band LFM92

M15

50% completenessI=27.2 M814 =+8.1

I-band luminosity functions are indistinguishable. STIS/LP data provide independent check – agree.

Piotto et al 97;Shifted and renormalised

UMi dSph STIS LP LFSingle-band data, used offset field to correct (lower panel).

M15, shifted & scaled.

Again, indistinguishableluminosity functions

STIS LP transformed to I-band:

Histogram is derived from STIS LP data, using M15 data, open points are the directly observed I-band data.

…….and Statistics Various statistical tests were employed to quantify

the agreement of the various datasets: Linear, least-square fits to Log N vs Mag over

ranges of magnitude and various bin choices gave agreement to better than 2

K-S tests on unbinned data for a variety of magnitude ranges; rather sensitive to systematics such as relative distance moduli, but again general agreement at better than 5% significance level

-square tests on binned data, again range of bin centers and magnitude ranges; agree better than 5% significance

NICMOS DataThe NICMOS images are extremely sparse and not very deep (NB this program took several years to complete due to successive STIS failures and NIC2 was the best camera at the time initiated).

No new information on stars with normal main sequence colours

Excludes a hypothetical population of extremely red stars just below WFPC2 and STIS limits

Possible Complications Has mass segregation affected the LF in the

comparison globular clusters? – not significantly at these magnitudes at these radii, as estimated through modeling data in annuli

Is the binary population the same in UMi and in the comparison globular clusters? – see evidence for normal binary sequence in UMi, plus blue stragglers, so probably OK.

Reddening, relative distance moduli? – large bins, as adopted, lessen sensitivity to errors in these

Is Umi dSph relaxed? – several fields, same results

Invariant mass function Indistinguishable luminosity functions in two

systems of same (narrow) age and metallicity distributions

Same underlying stellar mass functions, despite very different in most other ways e.g. different galaxy, different dark matter content, different mean stellar densities…. Stellar density in UMi probably significantly

lower now than when stars formed, but likely still much less than a globular cluster

Same low-mass IMF in Galactic Bulge

Zoccali et al 2002

High metallicity, -0.3 dex; old, ~ 12Gyr

M15

Mass Functions If adopt Baraffe et al models, our 50%

completeness limits all correspond to ~0.3M

and a power-law slope somewhat flatter than Salpeter over the range 0.3M–0.8M:

consistent with local disk (Kroupa 03) But M-L transformation not well-defined for K/M dwarfs, especially as function of age and metallicity

Find eclipsing low-mass binary systems in open clusters of known age and metallicity (Hebb, Wyse & Gilmore 2004; 2005..)

Photometric Monitoring of Open Clusters

Selected six nearby open clusters, old enough to have low-mass stars on the main sequence

Age and metallicity from brighter member stars Age range 0.2–4Gyr, metallicity –0.2 dex to solar Monitored 1 degree FOV, well beyond nominal

cluster radii Survey designed to detect eclipse events in low-

mass systems, primary 0.3M – 0.5M , with periods of hours to days

Expected detection efficiency (percentage) for low-mass systems with adopted survey parameters,from Monte Carlo simulations (two different mass ratio distributions assumed, solid and dotted lines)

Six observing runs 2002-03, KPNO 4m + INT

For example, DSS image of NGC 6633 plus INT pointings

Montage of differential light curves

Useful to check forsystematics

Standard deviation in lightcurves vs I-band mag for all non-blended objects in M67 field (KPNO)

Detection of Eclipse Signal

Simple rms of light curve fails to distinguish Observing strategy used pairs of observations;

Stetson J-index designed for such programs. Measures the residuals of pairs, but also in fact no great improvement in finding (simulated) eclipses

Box-fitting algorithm (Tingley 03; Kovacs et al 02) designed to detect periodic signals which alternate between two discrete levels best

Output by box-fitting algorithm for a set of simulated lightcurves with sampling rate and rms values chosen to match real data: open circles no eclipse, stars with eclipse added. Algorithm recovers correct eclipse period for I < 20, where rms = signal

Signal Detection Efficiency vs I-mag

M35

Phase

Eclipse candidates found!

Spectroscopic & high-frequency photometric follow-up planned.

V

JSolid: single M3 ~0.4M

Dashed: binaries Empirical SEDs from Leggett (92)

NGC1647

Solid: M2V 0.5M

Unequal mass binary

Empirical SEDs from Leggett (92)

K ITiO

TiO

TiO

Fe I

Na I

TiO

CaH

CaH

H

~~

~~

Julian Date - 2450000

~~

Hel

ioce

n tri

cR

a dia

l Vel

o cit

y(k

m/s

)

TiO

TiOTiO

M2V from TiO

Radial velocity

Period of model radial velocity curves taken from light curves.

NGC 1647 candidate

km/s

~0.2M ~0.5M

Data also ideal for :

Studies of mass segregation and dynamical evolution in clusters

Calibrate metallicity scale of K/M dwarfs ‘G-dwarf problem’ with K/M dwarfs, true

unevolved stars… Field Galactic structure….lines of sight

include the outer disk…

Massive Star IMF at High Redshift Type II supernovae have progenitors > 8 M

and explode on timescales ~ 107 yr, less than dynamical timescale of typical dwarf galaxy, and less than duration of star formation

Low mass stars enriched by only Type II SNe show enhanced ratio of -elements to iron, with value dependent on mass distribution of SNe progenitors – if well-mixed system, see IMF-average

Type Ia SNe produce very significant iron, on longer timescales, few x 108 – 109 yr

Gibson 1998

Progenitor mass

Eje

cta

Type II Supernova yields

Schematic [O/Fe] vs [Fe/H]Wyse & Gilmore 1993

Slow enrichmentFast

IMF biased to most massive stars

Self-enriched star forming region.Assume good mixing so IMF-average yields

Type II only

Plus Type Ia

Schematic of expected pattern of [O/Fe] in stars for system with continuous star formation. The plateau reflects enrichment by a massive-star-IMF-average and value will vary with IMF; slope =1.2 [O/Fe]=0.3The turn-down is due to input of iron from Type Ia SNe which starts at some delay, 1—2 Gyr (?), after birth of progenitor binary system. The [Fe/H] reached by this time depends on SFH.

Gilmore & Wyse 1991

Cayrel et al. 2004

Cosmic scatter in elemental abundances of metal poor halo stars is extremely low, 0.05 dex – fully sampled IMF of massive stars?

Invariant IMF!

Nucleosynthesis implies slope similar to Salpeter, same as localdisk, gives [/Fe]

Edvardsson et al 1993; Nissen 2004

Different symbols for different stellar populations: Filled circles are thick disk (kinematically), open circles are thin disk: both consistent same IMF

Local F/G dwarfs

LMC stars show sub-solar ratios of [/Fe], consistent with expectations from extended star formation.

Smith et al 2003 Gilmore & Wyse 1991

Hiatus then burst

Continuous star formation

gas

Tolstoy et al 2003

Large open colored symbols are stars in dSph galaxies, black symbols are Galactic stars: the stars in typical dSph tend to have lower values of [/Fe] at a given [Fe/H], consistent with fixed IMF and extended SFH, plus perhaps α-enhanced winds

Massive Star IMF: Elemental Abundances

Shetrone et al 01

Open symbols, UMi dSphFilled symbols, M92, M3

UMi and globular stars show Type II plateau, with value as expected for approx Salpeter IMF.

UMi perhaps downturn to higher [Fe/H]; some iron from Type I supernovae, expected if star formation duration 1–2 Gyr?

UMi distribution

~

Same Massive IMF in Bulge

McWilliam & Rich 04 Oxygen???

Conclusions and Future Work The low-mass stellar IMF is remarkably

invariant, over a range of metallicities, age, star-formation rates, surface densities, dark matter content, formation epoch…..most of the parameters that might have thought important – not Jeans mass fragmentation?

High mass IMF also apparently invariant, with close to Salpeter slope

Calibrate M/L for low-mass stars Understand how dSph evolve (ongoing

VLT/Flames/UVES project)

Evolution of Dwarf Spheroidals Expectation of simplest theory is that initial burst

of star formation drives a powerful wind that quenches subsequent star formation (e.g. Larson 1974; Dekel & Silk 1987; Wyse & Silk 1986)

Does not agree with spread in ages of dSph stars, or with modest derived rates of star formation

CDM models with star formation suppressed by reionization have similar problem with age range

Re-accretion of gas?? (Silk, Wyse & Shields 1987) Trend with distance, but why each dSph so different? Dark haloes accrete too and would light up..

Carina dSph metallicity distribution

Data Koch et al 2004 (inc. Wyse)Left, stochastic modelRight, model from Lafranchi & Matteucci 2003

Stochastic Enrichment model

Independent star-forming regions, each with identical ‘enrichment events’ occuring at a fixed mean rate

Enrichment is then a Poisson process For constant overall star formation rate,

metallicity distribution of long-lived stars given by integral over events

Model parameter is the mean number of enrichment events per region – changes shape. Adopted value of 2 here.

Searle 1977

Open Questions and Future Work What was the star formation history of the disk of the Milky Way? Was the merger history of the Milky Way mostly quiecsent since z ~ 2 (gas, fluffy old satellites..) Same questions for all galaxies! How important are flows of gas in evolution of different galaxies? Out and/or in? How did the dSph evolve? What are the parameters of their dark matter haloes? Need self-consistent model matching star- formation input to CMD, gas flows to dark halo etc.

More Open Questions and Future Work For MWG, ideally need elemental abundances, physical parameters (including age) distances and 3D kinematics for stars many kpc from the Sun – GAIA + GWFMOS (2010….) Large telescopes will extend such work beyond Local Group – need more than 30m! What is predicted in different models? – need to put star formation into models and detailed output such as elemental abundances and radial and temporal dependencies of merging, flows….

More Future Work

Need simulations to focus on accretion into the baryonic galaxy in more detail – radial dependences of mass ratios, densities, epochs

Star formation! Population III stars – where are they and

what was their IMF?

Concluding remarks:

There is a wealth of information in There is a wealth of information in resolved stellar populations, to constrain resolved stellar populations, to constrain how galaxies form and evolve.how galaxies form and evolve.

We are only beginning to understand this We are only beginning to understand this for the Milky Way –for the Milky Way –

is the Milky Way unusual????is the Milky Way unusual???? Lots of PhD theses…….Lots of PhD theses…….

Tolstoy et al 2003

Large open colored symbols are stars in dwarf Spheroidals, black symbols are Galactic stars: the stars in typical satellite galaxies tend to have lower values of [/Fe] at a given [Fe/H].

Unavane, Wyse & Gilmore 1996

Scatter plot of [Fe/H] vs B-V for local high-velocity halo stars (Carney): again few stars bluer (younger) than old turnoffs (5Gyr, 10Gyr, 15Gyr Yale)

Stellar halo is OLD

Carina dSph Carina dSph Leo I dSphLeo I dSph

Hernandez, Gilmore & Valls-Gabaud 2000Hernandez, Gilmore & Valls-Gabaud 2000

Intermediate-age population dominates in typicaldSph satellite galaxies – Ursa Minor atypical, has dominant old population (also normal IMF Wyse et al 2002)

LMC stars show sub-solar ratios of [/Fe], consistent with expectations from extended star formation.

Smith et al 2003

gas

Bensby et al thick disk

Very different pattern from LMC stars