The Sociohistorical Approach Founder of the Approach L. S. VYGOTSKY 1896 – 1934.
-
Upload
briana-morgeson -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
1
Transcript of The Sociohistorical Approach Founder of the Approach L. S. VYGOTSKY 1896 – 1934.
The Sociohistorical Approach
Founder of the Approach
L. S. VYGOTSKY
1896 – 1934
Lev Semenovich Vygotsky
Vygotsky
QUESTION:
WHAT SEPARATES US FROM OTHER ANIMALS?
VygotskyEPISTEMOLOGICAL AND OTHER DISTINCTIONS:
kinds of spontaneous culturalknowledge commonsense societal
natural sources of direct experience mediatedknowledge immediate conscious no yesreflective direction bottom up top downof dev inductive deductive
data driven theory driven
VygotskyTEMPERATURE TASKS
spontaneous cultural
Are these data good for Vygotsky? Bad for Vygotsky? Neutral for Vygotsky?
WHAT DEVELOPS?
INDIVIDUAL LEVEL
WORD MEANINGS
CULTURAL LEVEL
WORLD VIEWS
SPURRED ON BY TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES (PRINTING MACHINE, COMPUTERS)
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
SOCIAL INTERACTION
SMALL “S”CONVERSATIONS BETWEEN PEOPLEDISCOURSE ANALYSIS
LARGE “S”
SOCIETAL TECHNOLOGIES AS CONCEPTSCALENDAR AS AN EXAMPLE
Dan Sperber
Dan SperberCultural Evolution and Epidemiology
COMPARISON OF ROLE OF SOCIAL INTERACTION:VYGOTSKY’S THEORY AND PIAGET’S
PIAGET
SOCIAL INTERACTION CAN PRODUCE DISEQUILIBRIUM
PLACE OF CULTURE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION QUITE NEGLIGIBLE
VYGOTSKYMETAPHORS: ACQUISITION AND
PARTICIPATION (SFARD)
VYGOTSKY IS PARTICIPATION PIAGET IS ACQUISITION
VYGOTSKYZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT
SPATIAL METAPHOR
DISTANCE BETWEEN ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL KNOWLEDGE
X potential knowledgeZPD X potential ZPD
X actual knowledge X actual
Two children with the same actual knowledge travel different distances to their potential knowledge; therefore different ZPDs
VYGOTSKYDYNAMIC ASSESSMENT
CONVENTIONAL: TEACH – LEARN – TEST
VYGOTSKY: TEST/TEACH/LEARN
VYGOTSKYSCAFFOLDING
EXAMPLE: MY USING ADVANCED ORGANIZERS IN CLASS, SUCH AS THE DEEP STRUCTURE QUESTIONS AND MAP OF THE FIELD
VYGOTSKYRELATIONS BETWEEN LEARNING
AND DEVELOPMENTFORMER GOES BEYOND LATTER
TEACHING WITH SCAFFOLDING CAUSES LEARNING
LEARNING GOES BEYOND POTENTIAL KNOWLEDGE, WHICH IS THE DEVELOPMENTAL LEVEL
COMPARING PIAGET AND VYGOTSKY
PIAGET CLAIMS THAT DEVELOPMENT SETS THE LIMITS ON LEARNING
VYGOTSKY CLAIMS THAT LEARNING GOES BEYOND DEVELOPMENT AND DRWS IT IN ITS WAKE
VYGOTSKY – TRUE CONCEPT
TRUE CONCEPT CONCEPT THAT RESULTS FROM THE
AMALGAM OF NATURAL AND SOCIETAL KNOWLEDGE
TRUE CONCEPTS ENRICH SOCIETAL KNOWLEDGE BY
GROUNDING IT IN DIRECT EXPERIENCE ENRICH NATURAL KNOWLEDGE BY MAKING IT
MORE GENERAL
TRUE CONCEPTS
EXAMPLES: CONFLICT – TEMPERATURE
ANALOGY - ARITHMETIC
AVERAGE
TEMPERATURE
ARITHMETIC AVERAGE
DEVELOPMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
WHERE ARE THERE DEVELOPMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ON LEARNING?
CULTURAL/HISTORICAL CONSTRAINTS
Cultural periods in history (middle ages, enlightenment) had different worldviews than modern (post-industrial, information age)
INDIVIDUAL CONSTRAINTS
Vygotsky did not write about this very much
TOOLSMATERIAL
mediate between subject and physical environment
PSYCHOLOGICAL mediates between individual and himself
and between individual and others
NOTATIONS AS TECHNOLOGIES
NOTATIONS AS TECHNOLOGIES (OLSON, FERREIRO, LEVIN, TOLCHINSKY-LANDSMANN, RAVID, TUFTE)
PURPOSE: FREEZE THE CHANGING
WORLD
NOTATIONS “USES”:
1. CAN BE CARRIED FROM PLACE TO PLACE 2. CAN BE USED ACROSS TIME (NOVELS FROM THE
MIDDLE AGES)
ENABLES:
1. REFLECTION ON THE NOTATED SYSTEM 2. SELF-REGULATION 3. REGULATION OF OTHERS’ THINKING AND
BEHAVIORS
NOTATIONAL SYSTEMSExamples:
WRITING – NOTATES SPOKEN WORD (UR - 4,500 YRS)
DANCE NOTATION – NOA ESHKOL CARTOGRAPHY NUMERICAL SYSTEM MUSICAL NOTATION MIDDLE AGES – DORIT TANAY
CLASS ACTIVITIES
JEANNE BAMBERGER (MIT) TASK
CONSTRUCT NOTATIONS FOR A RHYTHM
ANALYZE INSTRUCTIONS