The Slope of Our Beaches and How it Affects Sea Turtle Nestgin

19
The Slope of Our Beaches and How it Affects Sea Turtle Nesting Emily Hardin Jaymie Reneker

Transcript of The Slope of Our Beaches and How it Affects Sea Turtle Nestgin

The Slope of Our Beaches and How it Affects Sea Turtle Nesting

Emily Hardin Jaymie Reneker

Introduction – Groins }  Installed in 1996 }  Currently 15 groins }  Tubes made of geotextile materials and filled with sand }  Used to combat erosion

Longshore Drift Longshore Drift

Is this also changing the slope of the beach?

Introduction – Beach Nourishment }  Section of South Beach is re-nourished }  650,000 m3 of sand initially dredged and added }  Re-nourished every few years }  Thought to have negative effects on sea turtle nesting

Village of Bald Head Island

Slurry Systems Marine Pty Ltd

Introduction – Beach Nourishment and Sea Turtles

}  Increases the amount of nest-able beach }  Affects:

}  Sand composition and temperature }  Slope

}  Loggerheads nest more frequently in areas with less shells (Garmestani, et al. 2000)

}  Number of nests has been found to decrease after nourishment (Rumbold, et al. 2001)

Introduction - Slope }  Slope is the most influential factor in nest site selection

(Wood & Bjorndal 2000) }  Slope preference can vary among species (Cuevas, et al. 2010)

}  Hawksbill prefer less steep beaches }  Greens prefer more steep beaches

}  Loggerheads prefer flatter slopes (Garmestani, et al. 2000) }  Different populations may have different preferences

(Cuevas, 2010)

Gnaraloo Turtle Conservation Program

Objectives }  Measure slope in four areas of Bald Head Island:

}  South Beach – groin field and re-nourishment }  South Beach – natural }  East Beach – developed }  East Beach – undeveloped

Objectives }  Measure slope in four areas of Bald Head Island }  Measure the slope of sea turtle nests }  Determine if:

}  Slope varies over the course of the summer }  Slope varies from location to location }  Sea turtles have a preferred slope }  Which beach is preferred by turtles

Methods }  Used slope profile poles

}  Started at vegetation line, measured to water line }  Measurements taken at low tide (± 2 hrs) }  Measurements taken every 2 weeks

Methods }  Measure the slope of nests

}  Caged nests: began halfway on either side of cage

}  Relocated nests: from center of body pit at original site

}  ANOVA test to determine if measurements differed

significantly }  p-value of 0.05

Results }  Did the slope change over time?

}  All areas except the natural section of South Beach changed significantly }  Groins, p=4.5x10-8 }  East Developed, p=3.4x10-5 }  East Undeveloped, p=0.04 }  South Natural, p=0.30

}  Second measurements seemed to be the greatest

Results }  Does the slope vary from location to location?

}  No significant difference in the average slope of each location (p=0.77)

}  Groins have steepest slope

Results }  Do our sea turtles have a preferred slope?

}  No, the slopes of nests are not statistically similar

} 

Results }  Which beaches do our turtles prefer?

}  Average slope of nests = -2.38 }  Most similar to South Natural and East Developed

Conclusions & Implications }  Slope changes over time }  Bald Head Island has a pretty uniform slope on all its

beaches }  Groins and beach re-nourishment are NOT affecting slope

}  Our population does not have a preferred slope }  Since the slope changes frequently, this allows them to be able

to nest throughout the summer

}  Average slope of ascents is similar to South Natural and East Developed beach slope }  Majority of our nests }  Factors other than slope may be at play

Further Directions }  Year-long study to observe slope changes over multiple

seasons }  Measure the slope of false crawls }  Take measurements more frequently }  Look back at previous data and continue study over time

Amelia Island Sea Turtle Watch, Inc.

References }  Cuevas, E., Liceaga-Correa, M.A., Marino-Tapia, I. (2010). Influence of Beach

Slope and Width on Hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) and Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas) Nesting Activity in El Cuyo, Yucatan, Mexico. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 9(2), 262-267.

}  Denison, P.S. (1998). Beach Nourishment/groin field construction project: Bald Head Island, North Carolina. Shore and Beach, 66(1), 2-9.

}  Garmestani, A.S., Percival, H.F., Portier, K.M., Rice, K.G. (2000). Nest-Site Selection by the Loggerhead Sea Turtle in Florida’s Ten Thousand Islands. Journal of Herpetology, 34(4), 504-510.

}  Rumbold, D.G., Davis, P.W., Perretta, C. (2001). Estimating the Effect of Beach Nourishment on Caretta caretta (Loggerhead Sea Turtle) Nesting. Restoration Ecology, 9(3), 304-310.

}  Wood, D.W., Bjorndal, K.A. (2000). Relation of Temperature, Moisture, Salinity, and Slope to Nest Site Selection in Loggerhead Sea Turtles. Copeia, 2000(1), 119-128.

Acknowledgements }  Thank you to everyone who helped me measure!

}  Brandt Quirk-Royal (+ modeling) }  Matt Salinski }  Connor Hinton (+ modeling) }  Amy Eldredge }  Abbie Dwire }  Savannah Currens }  Colleen MacGilvray }  Sara Thompson

}  Thank you to the one and only: }  Jaymie Reneker