The science of technology startups

58
The Science of Technology Startups: How to radically improve your startups chance of success

description

A presentation given at 2013 Tech4Africa about the science of technology startups.

Transcript of The science of technology startups

Page 1: The science of technology startups

The Science of Technology Startups: How to radically improve your startups chance of success

Page 2: The science of technology startups
Page 3: The science of technology startups

? ? ?

The first sale

What success?PREDICTS

Page 4: The science of technology startups

1 Planning doesn’t predict

Page 5: The science of technology startups

Source: Lange, Mollov, Pearlmutter, Singh and Bygrave (2007)

“new ventures launched with formal written business plans do not outperform ones

launched without them.”

Page 6: The science of technology startups

Business Plan?

Source: Bhide (2000)

21%

79%

Yes!No!

Page 7: The science of technology startups

No!

Page 8: The science of technology startups

No!

Page 9: The science of technology startups

No!No!

No!

Page 10: The science of technology startups

Doh!?!

Page 11: The science of technology startups

Did you change or adapt your original idea?

Source: Bhide (2000)

33% 66%

No!Yes!

Page 12: The science of technology startups

Evan Williams

Page 13: The science of technology startups

Source: Sarasarvathy (2011)

3 40 start upsto

$200 million to $6 billion

1IPO

Page 14: The science of technology startups

Failing to plan is planning to fail Specific result

Begin with the end in mind

Page 15: The science of technology startups

People

Knowledge

Resources

Market GapPlan

Causal Thinking

Market Research

Page 16: The science of technology startups

Opportunities

Knowledge

People

Resources

Outcome

Outcome

Outcome

Outcome

Outcome

Outcome

Effectual Thinking(Imaging a possible new end using a given set of means)

Page 17: The science of technology startups

What early stage activities predict success?

Planning doesn’t predict

The first sale

Page 18: The science of technology startups

2 Industry predicts

Page 19: The science of technology startups

Industry choice vs. Inc 500

Source: Shane (2009)

Industry Number of Inc 500 firms

Firm starts Percent of Starts

Pulp mills 6 33 18.182Computer and office equipment 99 2359 4.197Guided missiles, space vehicles, parts 2 60 3.333Nonferrous rolling and drawing 14 581 2.410Railroad car rental 3 136 2.206Measuring and controlling devices 49 2482 1.974Paper mills 3 125 2.400Search and navigation devices 6 310 1.935General industrial machinery 26 2173 1.197Photographic equipment and supplies 7 646 1.084Manifold business forms 3 281 1.068Household appliances 4 390 1.026Electrical industrial apparatus 11 1080 1.019Legal services 10 129207 0.008Eating and drinking places 34 494731 0.007Carpentry and floor work contractors 4 66383 0.006Real estate operators 5 90042 0.006Hotels and motels 2 39177 0.005Painting and paper contractors 2 43987 0.005Retail bakeries 1 22165 0.005Grocery stores 5 112473 0.004Used merchandise stores 1 24442 0.004Automotive repair shops 5 124725 0.004Beauty shops 3 79081 0.004Residential care 1 27710 0.004Videotape rental 1 27793 0.004

Page 20: The science of technology startups

Industry choice vs. Inc 500

Computer and Office Equipment (1/25)

Eating and Drinking Places (1/14,550)

Source: Shane (2009)

Page 21: The science of technology startups

Industry Inc 500

Computer and officeequipment

582 succeed

Eating and drinking places

1 succeeds

Source: Shane (2009)

Page 22: The science of technology startups

Correlation between number of startups in an industry and failure rate

0.77

Source: Shane (2009)

Page 23: The science of technology startups

What early stage activities predict success?

Planning doesn’t predict Industry predicts

The first sale

Page 24: The science of technology startups

3 Team Predicts

Page 25: The science of technology startups
Page 26: The science of technology startups
Page 27: The science of technology startups

5-year failure rate

Series1 13.1%

54.2.%

Source: Bruderl, et al. (1992)

+

>

Page 28: The science of technology startups

Team size in South Africa

90%

10%

1 founder

2 or more founders

Source: FinScope (2010)

Page 29: The science of technology startups

Inc 100 entrepreneurs with industry experience

75%

25%

Source: Fresser and Willard (1990)

Page 30: The science of technology startups

Industry experience

Source: Bruderl, et al. (1992)

Series1 25.5 %Industry Experience

No Industry Experience 54.5 %

Page 31: The science of technology startups

Strong Team

(1) 3 + members

(2) 50% joint experience

(3) 3 year industry experience

(19%)

(73%)

Source: Eisenhardt & Schoovenhoven (1990)

Page 32: The science of technology startups

What early stage activities predict success?

Planning doesn’t predict Industry predicts Team predicts

The first sale

Page 33: The science of technology startups

3 Seeking good advice predicts

Page 34: The science of technology startups

5-year survival rate

Series1 45%

80%

No advice

Source: Watson (2007)

Advice from accountants 3+/yr

Page 35: The science of technology startups

Successive entrepreneurship and no learning

Source: Pretorius & Le Roux (2011)

Page 36: The science of technology startups

Successful entrepreneurship and no learning

Source: Pretorius & Le Roux (2011)

Page 37: The science of technology startups

Successful entrepreneurship and no learning

Source: Pretorius & Le Roux (2011)

Page 38: The science of technology startups

What early stage activities predict success?

Planning doesn’t predict Industry predicts Team predicts Seeking good advice predicts

The first sale

Page 39: The science of technology startups

4 Funding predicts

Page 40: The science of technology startups

VC backed companies – 25% list

Source: Grompers et al. (2009)

Page 41: The science of technology startups

VC backing and Growth with controls

Source: Davila, Foster and Gupta (200)

Page 42: The science of technology startups

What early stage activities predict success?

Planning doesn’t predict Industry predicts Team predicts Advice good seeking predicts Funding predicts incredibly well

The first sale

Page 43: The science of technology startups

5 Traction is the ultimate predictor

Page 44: The science of technology startups

Expert entrepreneur

“I'd just go sell it. I don't believe in market research. Somebody once told me the only thing you need is a

customer."

Source: Sarasvathy (2007)

Page 45: The science of technology startups

First year sales as a predictor of growth

Source: Reynolds (1987)

Page 46: The science of technology startups

Source: Bhide (2000)

82%

8% 10%Somewhat Involved

Founder’s involvement in Selling?

Main Salesperson

Heavily Involved

Page 47: The science of technology startups

20times faster than startups that

scale prematurely

Startups that get traction before scaling grow 20 times faster than those that don’t

Source: Start Up Genome Report(2011)

Page 48: The science of technology startups

What early stage activities predict success?

Planning doesn’t predict Industry predicts Team predicts Advice good seeking predicts Funding predicts incredibly well Traction is the ultimate predictor

The first sale

Page 49: The science of technology startups

Thoughts to finish

Page 50: The science of technology startups

Contribute to humanity

Page 51: The science of technology startups

Contribute to humanity

Page 52: The science of technology startups
Page 53: The science of technology startups

Eink paper display

Page 54: The science of technology startups

100Million Trees

Page 55: The science of technology startups
Page 56: The science of technology startups

Hagen Stehr

Page 57: The science of technology startups

Problems?

Page 58: The science of technology startups

[email protected]@paulshawsmith

www.startupcherry.com