The Science of Additive Manufacturing and What the Future ... · Additive Manufacturing Systems...
Transcript of The Science of Additive Manufacturing and What the Future ... · Additive Manufacturing Systems...
The Science of
Additive
Manufacturing and
What the Future Holds
Amy Elliott, PhD Research Staff Manufacturing Demonstration Facility
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Oak Ridge, Tennessee
Key Takeaways
•About me
•The ten principles of additive manufacturing
•ORNL leading the way in areas of deposition rate and material science
•How additive manufacturing can be applied in companies
2 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Amy Elliott
BS – Mechanical Engineering (Tennessee Tech)
PhD – Mechanical Engineering (Virginia Tech)
Research: Additive Manufacturing
World’s First 3D Printing
Vending Machine
4 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
The Big Brain Theory – May 2013
5 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Science Channel – Outrageous Acts
of Science: Season 4 – Present
Internet Movie Database Rating
(IMDb.com): 7.3/10
Total Episodes: 52
Average Viewership: 586,000
(http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/)
6 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
1986: 3D Systems Stereolithography
Apparatus (Chuck Hull)
7 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
1995: Zcorp Indirect 3DP (MIT)
8 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
http://www.deskeng.com/virtual_desktop/?p=4722
https://c479107.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/files/12740/
area14mp/8k5997rw-1341844144.jpg
Bought by
3D Systems
in 2012
1989: Fused-Deposition Modeling –
Scott Crump, Stratasys
9 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Types of Additive Manufacturing
ASTM International: Technical Committee F42 on Additive Manufacturing
10 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Vat Photo- Polymerization
Material Jetting
Material Extrusion
Sheet Lamination
Powder Bed Fusion
Directed Energy Deposition
Binder Jetting
Principle 1: Complexity is Free
11 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Lipson, H., & Kurman, M. (2013). Fabricated: The New World of 3D Printing. Indianapolis, Indiana: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Withinlab.com
Principle 2: Variety is Free
12 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Lipson, H., & Kurman, M. (2013). Fabricated: The New World of 3D Printing. Indianapolis, Indiana: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Goyaldiecast.com
Principle 3: No Assembly Required
13 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Lipson, H., & Kurman, M. (2013). Fabricated: The New World of 3D Printing. Indianapolis, Indiana: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Austechexpo.com.au
Replicatorinc.com
Principle 4: Zero Lead Time
14 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Lipson, H., & Kurman, M. (2013). Fabricated: The New World of 3D Printing. Indianapolis, Indiana: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Makepartfast.com
Principle 5: Zero Skill Manufacturing
15 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Lipson, H., & Kurman, M. (2013). Fabricated: The New World of 3D Printing. Indianapolis, Indiana: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Makepartfast.com
Principle 6: Less Waste
16 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Lipson, H., & Kurman, M. (2013). Fabricated: The New World of 3D Printing. Indianapolis, Indiana: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Principle 7: Infinite Shades of Materials
17 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Lipson, H., & Kurman, M. (2013). Fabricated: The New World of 3D Printing. Indianapolis, Indiana: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Key Principles of Additive Manufacturing
18 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Replicatorinc.com
Complexity is Free Variety is Free
No Assembly Required
Less Waste
Infinite Shades of Materials Zero Constraints
Four more: Zero Lead Time, Compact and Affordable, Low-skill, Precise Replication
Manufacturing Demonstration Facility
19 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Manufacturing Demonstration Facility: a multidisciplinary DOE-funded facility dedicated to enabling demonstration of next-generation materials and manufacturing technologies for advancing the US industrial economy
www.ornl.gov/manufacturing
Working with ORNL’s MDF
• Identify opportunities aligned with ORNL’s MDF technology thrust areas
• Discuss ideas with the MDF director
• Jointly pursue funding to support collaborative activity
20 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Ever-Growing Partnerships:
Integrating the AM Supply Chain
21 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
• Site-specific material addition
• Application of advanced coating materials for corrosion and wear-resistance
• Repair of dies, turbines, etc.
• Metal matrix composites and sintered materials including:
• Stainless steel + bronze
• Tungsten + titanium • Ceramics + sand • Large build volumes
(10 x 10 x 16in) • Fast build times (30
sec/layer)
• Open-air environment • MIG welding arm with
6 DOF and 2 rotational degrees
• Print size not restricted
• Uses low-cost welding torches and wire
• CAD-to-path functionality
• Unheated powder bed
• Wide range of material choices (316L, 17-4PH, H13, Al, Ti, 718, 625)
• Precision melting of metal powders
• Up to 630 x 400 x 500mm build volume
Additive Manufacturing Systems
• Simultaneous additive and subtractive process for manufacturing complex geometries
• Solid-state process allows embedding of optical fibers and sensors
Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing (1)
Laser Metal Deposition (1)
Selective Laser Melting (3)
Metal Binder Jetting (2)
Large-Scale Welding (1)
Electron Beam Melting (4)
• Developing in-situ characterization, feedback, and control
• Heated powder bed • Expanding range of
materials (Ti64, CoCr, 625, 718)
• Precision melting of powder materials
22 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
• Capable of depositing 300mL/minute
• Can control material properties and speed on the fly
• Cross-linking between layers
• 2-part resin
Additive Manufacturing Systems Cont’d
23 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing 23 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
• Reducing buy-to-fly ratio of aerospace components
• Using 4kW laser and two 10kW lasers to melt Ti64 wire
• Inert system with argon-filled tent
• Prints ~10cubic inches/hr
• First rapid-quench HIP in America
• 180mm diameter • Can reach
pressures of 25,000psi
• Cooling rates of 3000C/min when cooled from 3000C
• Can HIP and heat treatment in same cycle
• Deposits up to 1000lbs. of pellet feedstock material per hour
• Build volume up to 20’ long x 6’ wide x 8’ tall
• Printed >37 different polymers and composites
• Dual material capabilities
• Under development • Will have 46’ x 23’ x
10’ build volume • Target deposition
rate of 1000 lbs./hr. • Will be 10x larger
and faster than previous commercial systems
• ~0.005” – 0.007” resolution
• Up to 914 x 610 x 914mm build volume
• 0.5 – 1.5 in3/hr. • Ultem and ABS
Large-Scale Laser Metal (1)
Hot Isostatic Press (1)
Large-Scale Polymer Deposition (3)
Ingersoll Large-Scale Polymer Deposition
Thermoset Dual Material Extrusion (1) Fortus MC
Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM)
• Large scale deposition system
• Unbounded build envelope
• High deposition rates (~20 lbs/h)
• Direct build components
• Tools, dies, molds
• Carbon fiber material reduces warping out of oven
24 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
BAAM Printed Car with Local Motors
and Cincinnati Incorporated
25 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
26 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
• Throughput • Feedstock Cost
Vecna.com
27 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Printed Car with Local Motors
28 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
3D Printed Shelby Cobra
29 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
30 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
AMIE Demonstration
Additive Manufacturing Integrated Energy (AMIE)
Digitally Manufactured Molds
Successfully Withstand Autoclave
ORNL’s digitally manufactured, high temperature thermoplastic molds withstood industrial autoclave cycles for the first time ever!
31 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
November 2015: Industry partners came to MDF to collaborate on this tooling
development effort Six new materials were successfully tested on the BAAM-CI during these trials
March 2016: Results from preliminary thermal characterization conducted at the
University of Tennessee Knoxville were very promising. Over three weeks, four tools
were fabricated using the two selected high temperature materials. Tools were 100%
digitally manufactured. No touch labor was involved. Each tool was printed in 1
hour and machined in 4 hours. Usual lead time is 14 weeks April 2016:The four tools were taken to an industry partner’s facility for testing from
April 5th – April 8th.
The tools withstood two autoclave cure cycles.
This was the 1st successful trial of 100% digitally manufactured tools in
autoclave cure cycles.
Carbon Fiber Technology Facility
32 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
A national asset to assist industry in lowering carbon fiber cost,
scaling technology, and developing products and markets
Scalable Process for Producing Low-
Cost Carbon Fiber
The Carbon Fiber Technology Facility at ORNL has developed a method for producing industrial-grade structural carbon fiber and flame-retardant fibers from commercially available acrylic precursor materials.
33 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Exceeds DOE target
mechanical performance for
automotive applications
>50% cost reduction over
traditional production methods
From low-cost, commercially
available multipurpose
use commodity fiber
Exhibits properties equal to or exceeding
conventional carbon fibers
Increase in capacity
greater than 3x over traditional
conversion process
equipment
Power reduction up to
60% per unit vs. traditional
conversion techniques
Scalable Process for Producing Low-
Cost Carbon Fiber Cont’d
34 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Vehicle Lightweighting
Reduce vehicle weight by using
carbon fiber throughout body and
chassis
Wind Energy
Build turbine components and
longer blade designs for applications in
wind energy
Gas Storage
High-strength, lightweight pressure
vessels for storage of gas
Recreational Equipment
Next-level performance for
sporting goods and recreational equipment
35 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Enabling Next-Generation Robotics
• Titanium made using E-beam AM (operating pressure 3000 psi)
• Integrated pump, fluid passages, and pistons with mesh for weight reduction
36 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Curved
fluid
passages
Pistons
integrated into
structure
Integrated
motor
and pump
Project AME
Additively Manufactured Excavator
37 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, in collaboration with
numerous partners in industry, government, and
academia, have produced the first fully
functional excavator using additively
manufactured components. Known as
Project AME, this working demonstration
showcases a wide range of industrial
applications for 3D printing.
Enabling AM of Aerospace Brackets
Collaboration with Industry
• Bleed Air Leak Detect (BALD) Brackets
• Buy to fly ratio of 33:1
• AM can reduce to 1.5:1
• ARCAM parts HIPed (900 ºC, 15ksi, 2 hours)
• Decrease cost by over 50%
38 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Property Minimum Value Maximum Value
Ultimate Tensile Strength, (ksi, MPa) 132 910 152 1,048
Elongation, % 12 22
Over 60 tensile specimens tested within a matrix of processing conditions
Enabling AM of Aerospace Brackets Cont’d
39 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Enabling AM of Turbine Blades
Science to Application
• Optimized internal cooling structures are desired for maximum efficiency
• AM can produce geometries not possible with conventional
• processes
• Decrease
• manufacturing
• costs while
• maximizing
• performance
40 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Turbine blade
Reconstructed image
using neutron tomography
Profilometry map illustrating distortion
Laser AM creates
large residual
stress leading to
distortion
laser AM of
turbine blade
40 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Enabling AM of Turbine Blades Cont’d
41 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Headquartered in Cincinnati, OH
•Largest number of AM
machines worldwide
•18-yrs experience in
laser deposition
•Works with every
major aerospace
company in US
Critical to widespread adoption of technology
Understanding link between
residual stress and additive
manufacturing
Utilizing neutron science to impact industry
Case Study: Throughput and
Operator Burden
42 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Figure 1: Arcam battery box
Figure 2: ExOne battery box
Figure 3: Renishaw battery box
Electron Beam Binder Jetting
25 hours 32 hours 160+ hours 1 Part
4 Parts ~100 hours 200+ ~35 hours
Laser
Mapping of Crystalline Structures
43 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Highly textured Polycrystal Letter contour has some texture
R. R. Dehoff,, M. M. Kirka,, W. J. Sames,, H.Bilheux, A. S. Tremsin, L. E. Lowe, and S. S.Babu,,. "Site specific control of crystallographic
grain orientation through electron beam additive manufacturing." Materials Science and Technology 2015
AM Adoption and the Point of No Return...
Phase 1: Redesign
Individual Parts for AM
• Example: Optimized
Brackets
Phase 2: Redesign
Assemblies for AM
• Example: Rolls Royce
Trent Engine Blades
Phase 3: Redesign entire systems
• The point of no return – tooling,
process, and design revolves
around certain technologies
Reversible | Irreversible
44 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing
Key Takeaways
•Additive enables • Optimized design and functionality
• Elimination or cost-savings in tooling
•Most important areas for research • Fundamental throughput limits and their impact on
cost
• Material properties need to be fully characterized and correlated with process parameters
45 SPARK – Additive Manufacturing