The Science Content, Conceptual Change, and Collaboration (SC4) Mathematics and Science Partnership...
-
Upload
samuel-burns -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of The Science Content, Conceptual Change, and Collaboration (SC4) Mathematics and Science Partnership...
The Science Content, Conceptual Change, and Collaboration (SC4) Mathematics and Science Partnership - MaineU.S. Department of Education
MSP Regional Meeting - San Francisco, CA
Feb. 13-15, 2008Dr. Francis Eberle and Joyce Tugel
Maine Mathematics and Science Alliance
Four Districts; 24 schools; 263 teachers grades grades K-8; 3,500 students
Three of 4 districts substantially below state average for at least 5 years (Maine DOE)
Identified as High Need Science – Physical and Nature of Science University of New England, Maine
Mathematics and Science Alliance and 4 Districts (1 Municipal, 2 - MSADs, 1 School Union)
Three years
SC4 -Background
SC4 - Goals
Increase district capacity for improving the teaching of science
Develop a sustainable community of learners
Increase students’ opportunities to learn science
Increase student achievement in science
SC4 – Project Structures
Partners4 DistrictsUniversityPD Partner
GovernanceAdvisory CouncilDistrict PD TeamTeacher Leaders
ComponentsContent KnowledgeStandards & Research on LearningInstructional StrategiesData and Action ResearchLeadershipCollaboration
PD StrategiesWorkshops (1-3 days)InstitutesOnline ForumsCurriculum ImplementationLearning CommunitiesConferencesDistrict Sessions
SC4 - Professional Development Model Conceptual change focus Layered, coherent and sustained Considered adult learning, district priorities
and structures Involve educators at all levels of the district
Outcome Continuum: 1. Building KnowledgeTeacher content knowledge, 2. Applying KnowledgeStandards and research on learning, 3. Producing
KnowledgeInstructional strategies,Data and action research,Leadership,Collaboration
SC4 – Professional Development ModelExamples of PD strategies Teacher Leaders – Curriculum Topic Study
(CTS), Workshops, Conceptual Change learning, Action Research
Teachers – Workshops (formative assessment, science and literacy, content, kit, curriculum design, CTS) Summer Institutes, after school meetings, Grade level teams, online book studies
Administrators/Leaders – District PD Planning, Workshops, data sessions, Advisory Council Meetings
SC4 – Teacher Progress
Teacher Knowledge Growth - Institutes
0102030405060708090
100
Institute One- Force andMotion
Institute Tw o-Thermodynamcis
Institute Three- Matter
Mea
n - p
erce
nt c
orre
ct
Baseline - Pretest
Posttest
Mean - Point Gain
2 Years Project Wide:
Participation in PD experiences ranges from100% to 60 % in theschools. Teachers have logged 5,422 hours of PD or an average of 18 hours/teacher.
SC4 – Student Progress (two years) Four of 6 district schools moved students
out of “Does Not Meet Standards” category in grades 4 and 8 in science (all areas) on State Assessment (1 remained the same)
All of districts reported 4th and 8th grade state assessment scores increased in physical science, while nature of science was comparatively the same to the first year.
On the SC4 designed assessment aggregated grades 3-8 subtest scores for the second year are higher in 105 of 120 (87%) sub scores as compared to first year.
SC4 – Student Progress (State assessment)
2 Years of Grade 4 Physical Science Scores on MEA
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11Schools
Per
cent
age
of P
oint
s
2006
2007SchoolsState
StateSchools
SC4 – Student Progress (State assessment)
2 Years of Grade 4 Physical Science Scores on MEA
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11Schools
Per
cent
age
of P
oint
s
2006
2007SchoolsState
StateSchools
SC4 - Summary PD is focused, sustained and offered
across many platforms Ownership and delivery for PD is
shifting to Districts Depth AND breath are a consequence
of the variety of learning opportunities for teachers
Districts are responding structurally Teachers are engaged Students are learning (tentative)
SC4 – Acknowledgements Co-Principal Investigators: Dr. Francis Eberle
Maine Mathematics and Science Alliance; Page Keeley Maine Mathematics and Science Alliance; Dr. James Vesenka University of New England
Project Director: Joyce Tugel, Science Specialist - Maine Mathematics and Science Alliance
Professional Development Support: Grace Scarano – University of New England
Lynn Farrin, Nancy Chesley and Chad Dorsey - Maine Mathematics and Science Alliance
District LeadersGail Sullivan - Assistant Superintendent MSAD #35 Sue Austin- Assistant Superintendent MSAD #60Elaine Dow - Assistant Superintendent Auburn School DepartmentDennis Duquette - Superintendent School Union 29
Evaluation: Dr. Bill Nave
http://www.mmsa.org/SC4
Disclaimer
The instructional practices and assessments discussed or shown in this presentation are not intended as an endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education.