All issues of The RESISTER arc archived on INot just another pretty boffd. (612) 8854512

BBS in Minneapolis.- 14400 bps - 24 Hours.

Thc 0E$ISTERIlr 0lficirl Publicatlon ol thr tprcirl forccc Undrrground

Uolumc l, llumbcr 2. Aufumn l9ll4

NEW WORLD ORDERCOMBAT ARMS SURVEY

Question # 46"I Would Fire Upon U.S. Citizens..."

The RESISTER has coDfrm€d rbat US Navy SEALplrtooDs, itrcluding SEAL Team Sir, Marine combat veteransstatiorcd a! TtveDty-Ni.De Palns, CA, ad Madne basicFainees at C.anp PeDd€hon, CA, heve been adDitrisffied aquestiomaire askhg, amory o&er tlings, if they would'.. .6re upon US citizens who .efi$e or resist confscation offirealms banDed by tt€ US gove.trllleirt. i

The qu€$iomaire was fi61 adDi'risl€icd to operstorsby lie coDrreders of SEAL T€am Six on 15 S€!'tcmber 1993,lheo sntEe$€ntly to tle rsDsinirg SEAL plrroors 6$ughoutS€pteDber aod October. Rumo.s began circulnitrg itrNoveDber thet US Arrny DELTA operators wcrc giv€o thesaE or siDilrl qu€stiomate. The SF UderglorDd hed b€enaware ofthe questiooBire siDce late S€ptedri but ourobserv€as had been ueble o sec&e s capy or coDftm odrcrth,rr its $b61arcr co.siiled ofqu€srioDs p(eteili|rg to tt€&bordirariotr oftIle US Miliary to the UN ed coDiscatiotrof tle ft€{Ims of US citials. Itr €ady taDuary, 1991, weobtlied ! c.py of tte que*io@aire tom oe of our DODsy4alhizers but hckiDg conobofiion we nn the $ory inVol.I, No. 1 of The RESISTER ss a ftrDor.

On January 22, 1994, orE of ou observers copicd ac-hilling tPss,g€ off the Inter4t ftom P€lty Ofdcer hd ClrssW. Kelly, US N.vy Special Wfffirc T€am Sir, to D.Hawkilrs, Re: cun Confscaaio!" Ketly bcgao by stating tharlhe queslioDraire wrs '. . .to find out if we would bllow th€orders of commaDditrg ofrccrs {rithout question.' (Kellyonitted the ftct that the q$€stiotrnfue assur€s 'connaodiogoftc€rs' gives equal aulhoriq to UN office.s coErarditrg USforE€s.) Kely co hued:'If youwish to findolt how IaDswercd, I said ycs I would 6re and kill all peNotrsrtterytirS to r€sisl...we el€|trt r$urd to be drc good cuys.'Reneder, f\euy ii rcfeniDg ro AEricatr civiliaDs.

ln February, 1994. MODERN CUN oagsziE ran r

s1ory oo the elusive qu€slomair€ which was subsequerdycirculated by v3do|rs parriotic citizens groups. TheD, o[ 10May, 1994, the questioDruirc was 'dministered to MarineDesen Storm veterans at Twenty-Nine Palils, CA. A Marinesmuggled a copy of the questiomaire out of (he testitrg cederard Dail€d it otr 15 May, 1994, with a cover lettrr, to iheeditor of THE NEW AMERICAN, whlch ran the story itr rheirJuly I I , 1994, issue. THE NEW AMERICAN quotes theMadn€'s iryression tbat the questiooDair€ 'was jusl rcsearchfor this (Nrvy) conrDrderh(sp) degr€e.' TheRESISTER obtained a copy of the Maiitrc's letter, wbichrcnrally slates: 'A Navy Conlland€t c{.@ before us e.trd seidbe was wortitrg otr his Daslers &gr€e aod bc was writiag apaper rbout giving W our niliirry's soverEtty(sp) !o theUnited Natio6 Seu€trry GeErel.'

The official DOD lie sutrorrdi,lg 6e questiomaireenlitled 'Cotrbat AIms Sulvey,' sr4,ports tlat of lhe NarTCottrDaDder. Signific{rdy, the CoDbat ArE6 Survcy was 6rstgiven at tle dre PrBibrrial D€cisiotr Dir€c-tivc (PDD) 25was b€itrg prrp8r€d. The RESISTER'S conEspond€ot itr thePenagon $sff of tle Joitrt Chieft of Strfr codrms thrt pDD25 sunEodeIs coeol of tbe U.S. nilitary to tfie Unit€dNador|s. (A c|lrsory suvey of anicl€s writt€o by MACOMconm-ryie's and staitr rEmb€Ns h odcial oiliury jourDals forthe past year rEvea$ a urdv€.sel acce!'ta@ of U.N. aodrol ofthe ADericar military.)

The RESISTER has b€cn elicitfug res?onses to thequ€stionDaire for .he prst y€ar, FrightedDgly, aEolg sewicenembers wi& less thatr l0 y€€rs of s€rvice, 63 S agr€e orstrongly agreo with qu61iotr #rt6t 'l would 6re upotr U.S.citizeB who rcfuse or r€sist coofscrrioa of 6r€{Ims baDred bythe U.S. gov€mmeof.' Aoong tew r€cluiG almo$ 90giveahe rEslotrset 'If it's thc Lw aod they ot|br oe to do il, Iguess it's doy.' Our fod€raly cotrtrolled Fublic schools havedooe thenjob.

Of tho6e wilt mrc than 15 yea$ of scwice, 87%rcplied 'disxSr€e' or 'srongly disegrEe.' RespoDses byDmbers of the Specirl Forces Udergroord were uryrirrtable;basically, theE will Dot be maly of6ce$ lllho give (hat ordermore thatr orce.

Thc RESISTER has enclosed i clpy Of the CodbatArEs Survey wilh tlis issue. As you read it p6y pocicriar

Vol. I, No. 2 RESISTER / I

attfrlior to thc qualifiers aod their relation to r€ceot afiicles iotle o6cial publicatioDs of thc D€portncd of Defetrse, thecivilistr D€dia, and &e polici€s of the fedenl govemlneot. .,

Editoriel NoteiThe c.clos€d Combat Arns Survey is e true ad

&curare r€goductiotr of the conenr< of thc questiomeirc. Wealtered the fonoat to accomnodale the The RESISTER'Shyout. --THE EDITOR

COMBAT ARMS SURVEY

Tbi! qEdio@iF is to gniE. tLt aEmirg tlE .ditub. of c@brr t ri!.d !.m.Dl wirh G8!ds ro eluditionrl oi$i@, Att of yN cqotge df&nlid. Wi. yN .!|ffi dir.crlt o! e. qecidndG fom. In p.n n, de r 'X. h d* 6?e pdid.d fo. yq FEo&.

Pan I. DeDosraphics

L Whn edic. e yd in?

3, Whd i. tu MOS co<L ..d &qipiidl

6. llor lMy mntB did yo Frc in SonEti.?

PanII Attitudes

2, W!.1h IN pry errd.? (?,g- E?, G7)

/1, Wh.r i! ytu bi8t i LEl of.rnrddd in y.r6?

5. IId tuy Ddnl! did tq 'e ia Opc i@ D.Err Sro6/Dd.n Shield?

7. wlrt 3Lt! d @nlr, did t@ prim.ily &3ib i! du.irg dild[ood?

Do you fe6l th U-S- Comb.t troo!'s shortd be [5cd withir ttc United Sta&s for lny of lhe fo[owitgmissioff?

8. Drug enforcenent{)()()(){)

Strongly disagree Disagree Agree strongly aqtee No opinion9. Disaster reuef (e.9. ttulricanes, floods, f,l-les? earthquakes)()r)()()()strongly cllsagree Disagree agree stEongly agree10. S€curity at national. events (e-9. olyrpic Gahes,() ()()()strongl"y disagree Dlsagree Agree strongty agree

11- EovlloBnentat alisaster clean-up()()()()Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree12. Su.bstitute teachers in pub-tic schools

No opinionsuper Bowl )

{)No opinion

()No opin1on

()()()()()Strotrgly disagr€e Dlsagree Aglee stlongly aglee No opinion13. CorEulnity assistance plograms (e.9. landscaping,envilonnental clean-up, roacl repair, aninal control)() ()() ()Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree14- Federal and state prison guards

()No opinion

()()stlongry agree No opinion

of lUegal aliens into U.S-

() ()() ()()strongly agree No opinionStlonqly disaglee Dtsaglee A.gree

15. National etErgency police force()()()()()

Strongly disaglee Disagree Agiee strongly agree No opinion16. Advisors to S.W.A.T. units, the FBI or the Bureau ofA.lcohol, Tobacco, and Eirearrns {B-A.T-F-)() {)()

fj.strongly disaglee Disagree AqreeI?. Border patrol {e-9. pleveDtlon

Vol. I, No. 2 RESISTER / 2

Do I.d feel tbat u-a- cosib.t trooPt uD&! ('.9. ccmlndshou.I.d bc uscd ln oth€r @untrl€3 for lnd of ttn follorLngnrl.tcd Nation3 D1a310Ds?

{) {)() ()()

18. Drug enforcement()()l)()1)

strongly disagree Disagree Agree strongly agree No opinion19. Disaster Eelief (e.q. hurricanes, ffoods, fires,

()()()()()Strodgly disagree Disagree Aqree Strongly agree No opinion20. Environnental disaste! clean-up

()()(){)()strongly disagree Disagree Agree strongly agree No opinion21- Peace keepinq

strongfy disagree Disagree Agree strongly agree No opinion22- Nation building (Reconst.uct civi.l goverMent, developpublic school system, develop or nnprove public transPortation

(){)()()l)strorgfy disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree No opinion23. llunanrtarian relief (e.g- food and medlcal eupplies,tenpoEary bousing, and clothing)

()()()()()stlongly disagree Disagree agree strongly aglee No opinion

Do l'ou !..I tlEt U.S. c@bat t.rool's sbdLd be uecd !totber courllies, un&! c.@.nd of !oD-lr.s. offl.cea3 .I4)ointed b!'th. ttdt d Natlonr fo3 .Dy of t'b6 fo].loring Dirtl'ons?

24. Drug enforcement()()()()()

Stroogly disaglee Disagree Agree Strongly aglee No opinion25. Disaster relief (e.9. hurricanes. f].oods, f,l-res,earthquakes)

()()()()SlroDgly disaglee Disagree Agree stlongIy agree26. Ervironmeneal disasler clean-up()()()()stlongly dlsagree Disagree Agree Stlongly agree27. Peace k€eping

()

()No opirdon

() (){) ()()stlong-ly alisaglee Disaglee Agree StlongLy agree No opinion28. Nation builatl-ng (Reconstruct civil govettulen!, developpu.blic schoot systen, develop o! Lq)rove publlc traBsportation

()()()strongly disaqree Disagree Agree29. Eunanitalian r:elief (e.q. f,oodterpolary housing, and crothing)

()()()

(){)StroDgly agree No opiniob

and DedicaL supplies,

)()aglee No opinion

)()aglee No opirlion

strongly disagree Disagree Agree strongly30. Police actiod (e.g- Korear Vietnam. butnon-U.s- officers)

()()(){Strongly diaagree Disagree t\gree Strongly

codsl.alor th. foltorl.|ig rtlt D!tr:31. The U.s. runs a field trainj,ng exercise. U.N. conibar lroopsshould be auowed to ser:ve in U.S. cohbat units durinq theseexercises under U.S, conmand and control.

Vol. I, No. 2 RESISTER / 3

() ()()()()st.rongly dlsaqree DisagEee r\gree srronqf,y agree No opinion32. ?he united Nations runs a fietd traintnq exercise. U.S.combat troops under U.S. conmand and conrrol should serve inU.N. combat units during rhese exercises.() ()()()()Stlongly disagree Disagree ,rgree strongty agree No opinion -33. The united Nations runs a fiefd trainlng exercise. u.s.conbat troops shoufd 6erve under U.N. conunand and controt tnu.N. duling these exercises.

()()()()()strongly disagEee Disagree Agree srrongly agree No opinion34. U.S. coribat troops shoutd participate in u.N. rlisstons aslong as the U-s- has futl conmand and control.() ()()stfongly disagree Disagree Agree srrongly agree No opinion35. U.s. conbat troops should participate in U.N. nissions uncte!United Nations cornmand and contlol.() ()() (){)Strongly disagree Disagree Agree strongly agree No opinion35. u.s. conibat troops sboutd be comnanded by u.N. officers andnon- colurissioned (NCOS) at battafion and corQany levels whileperfondng U.N. rdssions.

{) ()() {)()strongly disagree Disagree Agree strongly agree No opinion37. It would nake no difference to ne to have u.N. soldiers asmedbers of my teah. (e.g- fire team, squad, platoon)

() ()() ()()Strongly disagree Disagree Agree strongly agree No opinion38. It woufd make no difference to ne to take oEders from a U.N.conpany cormander.

()()()()()Strongly disagree Disaglee Agree Strongly agree No optnion39. I feel the President of, the United States has the autholityto pass his responsibilitles as CoMrander-in-chief to the U.N.Seclelaly General.

() ()() ()()Stlongly disagree Disagtee lrgree strongly agree No opinior40. I feer thele is no conflict between my oath of offLce andserving as a U.N. soldie!.

() ()() ()()Strongly dtsagree Disaglee Agfee strongly aglee No opinion41. r feel- lly uIlit's co&bat effectiveress nould not be affectedby pel.fornlng hluanitarian missions for the united Nations.() ()() () ()strongly disagree Disagree Aglee stlongly agree No opinion42. I feel a desiqnated unit ot U.S- cor0bat sotdiers should bepermanently assigned to the coMtanal and conllot of the United

() ()No opinioD

to a U-s-

{)() ()stlongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree43- I irould be wiUing to voluntee! for assignmen!conbat unit under a u-N- cot[nande!.

() ()() ()()Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly aglee No opinion44. I would like U.N- menber countrtes, including the tJ.s., tothe u.N. all the soLdiers necessary.to alaintain world peace.

()(){){)()slrongly disagree Disagled' Agree Strongly agree No opinion

Vol. I, No. 2 RESISTER / 4

{5- t rould steri! to eh. foUori.ng code:

nl e a ttrdtlal N.tions f,igtrting Flaon. r sere ia tlEfolces f,bich haLntaLn rolld P€!€ .nd .w€sy nalionts t.Y ofUfe. I u Plepated to gic qa ll.fe ir tbela &fease.'

()()()()()strongly dlsagree Disagree Agree strongfy agree No oPinion

,16. !h€ u.s. gov.nFnt alecLalee ! taa on th€ po3aessi.on, aal',tr.nsPortltion, and transce! of r1l non-albrtLng fir'.63 ' Athirty (30) daY @€3ty Fdod i5 Peaitled ifo! t,bete ftft'lc!o lte turaed ov.! the l-ocaJ. authoE:tt€B. At ctto erd of thiaPertod, a auib.r of citit.n groups lcfuse to !u!a ove! thelrfis.tns. constder tlF foll-onl.ng 3t!t mrt:

I rould tilc uPon u.s. citl.zens tho lefuse o! lesilcconfiscatLon ot tl.realas b.t|ned by tbe u.s. goneEtlDat.

{)()()()()strongly disagree Disagree Aqree strongly agree No opinion

Our civilia[ re{deIs naybe wondering why the Combat Arms Survey was cirDulated so heavily withio the Departtnetlt ofthe Navy. Th€ r€ason is sinpl€; the Navy is not subjec ao USC Title l0 Poss€ Comitatus prohibitioBs against using federal

military forc€s for don€stic law enforcement. This includ€s the US Marine Corps.

Just ilought you would like to know. TTI{E STAFF

EDNORIAL

The Lie of Equal Opportunity

Tb€ Eqnl Opodroity Prognn of &e UDited St{@sArmy cleirrs ttat it fo(eJrres, dirEcts, ard ssaiDs acoqrclreGive efu to eosur€ hir fta@t of dl soldic.s'based solely on mit, 6Bs, c4bility, ard p@diat, r4,tichsmcs cadim.' This policy is st t€d to be bssed or'mir6, juslice,.rdoquity.' But}3 siDpb Actir lbat iflhe Bqnal Opporblity ProgrrD e€rr based solely on Git,fiN, capability, erd pot4diat lt.te would be D D€ed for it.Tb€ BO policy officirlly seio6, bt irs v€ry €f,ince,urhir6, iaiusricc ard iqudity.

The ptilo6ophical pltdnF of .[ cqu.l oppo.troityprograDs is cgalitadani$l Egalihdadrn is 6e bcliefdar all|@ rre oqoal. If '€qulity' is brld o any sedo|s or..tiorelsad3td, es itr tt3 re.le ofpolitics ard hw, egalibdalisn is6e priDciple of irdividusl rights wbich c&not bc rcp.alcd bydeDocraric nr&jority, subvdted by Ditrority mchin"tion., Dorinfii.n8ed by govcl@t lcgirtation"

But politicrl rnd legaf equelity are not the intcor ofequal opporonity progtrms. Eqoal opportulitt prograns se*Dolhing l€ss than METAPHYSICAL €quditl ee cquality ofabiliay, conp@, indrgriouss, std inlellig.&e. Equaloppoftrtrity progass, by 6ctu very exisl€4, &ry tbeobj€ctive rcatity tbat all @ arE mt €quel. Tbey se€& toabolirh sore pqceived 'urfiiro€ss' that do€6 ma penrdt tlein€et, iEoryetenf lrzy, or stwid to sllcceed.

Noie lrcw ee gel ofequality is ehifr€d.Sie equal lecrgdti@ for uDequal pefi'Ioaoce

wol d be too obviouJ {tr irdugice, €qoel oppoftrdtyeerfibriens prohibit rqual pcrfolrEe. (Read srd OER or

NCOER.)Becaus€ solrle mtr rtE to acc@t rcAonsibinty ftsler

tha,l others, lhe egalitad{s detry lte rctioo of 'oerif aodslrbEtrtute the coDcept of 's€Diority' for promotions. (Sodythe r€6ults on etry ploootion bood.)

Sie soe I'eo are mrE hlelig€nt thao olhers, theegafihriaos fotid individual c*cel€rcc ad srbotdi.rtc it tothe colective Dcdioaiity of 'cotrs€ns1|s hilditrg' t tdrtuldr9irg iDsriuxioel gor*lhiDt- (Obaerve tie woddtrgs ofsny comiljtee or 'tcar!.")

SiDcc so@ @ hrve gr€er.Dility sDd stody @reconscicniously tiao o(bers, the egdiarir!6 aboliS objcclivertrrd.rds bes€d on aaticv€rr€ff ard sut6lit|Itc odcoDo+osed'staDdards' that eqoate &e Ltr !o fte 6t ard the @mn to theitrtrligpd. (Ateod ary school.)

Eqtnlity of oppounity hrs rffhirg to do wirhequality o. omolt,nity. It is the o6daf do.aie ofncisd,tdbalisn, ald ca[edivi$r. lt is b|i oE pninise oftbauoconsciooable evif ofslfuisNi, F4ud o?pottriay i! ltcoEciel sarction of lhe It.E€d of the good BBCAUSE it isgood.

If th€ Ardy's Equal Opporbrdty Progras were ttdybased oo itrdividual '@it, fil'6, cipability, ard potcdial,'penomel r€cords would be putgod of a[ Efertr€s to rece

!r!d e{hric odgi& tte Official }ho(o wo'uld be elimipt€d, estc.n@!de.s rvould aCrin have loaal proinotiod aulrodty aboveStatr S€rg€ont.

-Richald Cro6soan

AN OPEN LETTER TO OUR READERS

For the past two monlis onr observers hsvc beenr@od;ng tbat sore rc.das are qrr€stiolirg lhe iitegdty of

Vol. I, No. 2 RESISTER / 5

contdbutors !o Th€ RESISTER because rhey choose to bek rowlr by ps€udotryf,s nther lhetr their re3l n rnes. This is alegitinate carcem aod it des€rves to b€ answered at leryth.

First, no coDtribuior is obliged to use a pseudonym,as rnybody who has actually READ ahe first issue can (€llyou. Secod, the decision to require stafr rDembers aodreSular contributors to use pseudonyms wes an OPSEC issle,Dot an ethicd one. Tbird, there is a hisrorical prccede{ wefollow which, if mt alreedy frmiliar to you, in all likelihoodnever will b€, and is thereforc rcne of your busioess. Fourth.publishiDg The RESISTER is a s€cudty risk itr ils owtr ri8ht,let alone rcfenitrg to in tradecraft aod organization. Realy,what DO they teach you guys in the qroulse thes€ days?

The RESISTER is a response to |he eltruisticcannibalism which is co6urDing the principle of inali€mbleitrdividual riShts upotr whicl this nation wes founded aDdwhich have been served-{rp in sacrifice to the mob god ofdemoqacy, the minority god of tribxlism, the nrtue god ofetrvironnentalism, the slave god of collecaivism, atrd the steristgod of socialisn-

Do you want to know who we are? We are theirdividuals who cooceive the ideas the cretinous mob calls "thetqm effort. " We are Oe individuals whos€ excellence issubve(ed by the ncisr trolicy of 'equal opportunity., We arethe independeft, iDrovxrive, and q€ative who have tleeneLslaved to serve the 'gr€ater good. " Without l$ you wouldstill b€ pryiog roots out of gmuod with a poiatd sick.

It would be r great coofort rnd convenieDce for themydad u[coDstitutiooal fedenl egelcies to Dote us, cstegorizrus, and file us awxy for firqre 'aefereoce. " We will nor givethem an eady cbance, nor wil w€ be g@ded i4o idedi&ingourselves by soeeritrg cotrmeds about atrotrynous wd@rs.

Every whim bas€d, urL6rd, urjudicable law itpass€s; every urr6titudonal garg of arDed badge wi€lditrg&ugs ia deploys; cvery uEotstitr{iooal ege&y it qeete6:every iDcoq'rrbe.sible special interest rcguluioD it oadates;every di,l'e extoned tbmugh aaxrfion rod r€disldbuted to theitrcoryetenl and undeserviDg; ev€rl' A@dc.n life 1061 h somealauislic war, hooenitrdln assisarce, or pcacdreepingopef,atio4 d€DoDslfates ihe ilcgitimcy of tlrc fedeBlgov€rtrme[t.

The f€denl gover@ft is oot 'of tte people,. it isthe iDsllrlrn€nt of pul-peddlers. Itis not "by the people,. iais.he toady of special interesls. It is lot 'fr)r lhe people,' it isah€ €xercise of force for th€ sake of force-

Pass laws agairBt us; we will Dot obey. Regulat€ ourectivities; w€ will trot coqly. l,egislatc our behavior; wewill oor cooseDt.

We are tEe@r|. We will trot be subjugat€d. Webave &e guos (o pm\€ it. _THB EDITOR

CORRESPONDENCE

ls The RESISTER For Resl?

As I write this letter the various coffineots I haveheard conceming The RESTSTER rctum to mind. The firstone is, 'Are you for real?' The coN€rse being tbat yourputtication is a U.S. Govertro€ plant to e rap membe$ oftIrc SOF community into revsliru tbcms€lves. S€cordly, whynot pnnt the neoes of the contributors? Toe that isobvious, but l'll let you explail

Thought I would let you klow I got r big kick oul ofthe 'PersoMls.' Reniods me of WWII and the FrcDcbResislance stories I have beard end le{d, Also the com&oblock was r nic€ to{rcl.

If you ere an ectud paper I hope you have the spaceto pdnt this letter. Ir will as least sho{, some of the doubtingher€ at the Special Warfare Cenrer and School that there issomeoDe out there. Plesse f€el ftee to use my .ame and officeas I see tro treed to use a non de guerre. SFC David R. Hall

USAJFKSWCS

Yes. See RUMORS. Wo will: S€e Vol. I No. l,p.6, col. 3, par.. 3, in. 16. It is iqrolite io discusstradecraft. Read-S€cret Forces: The Techdque ofUrdergiound MoveDents, by F.O. Miksche. Weas$rne you mean rnotr de plume.' --TI{E EDITOR

CONSERVATIVE REVIEW

I have rcceived a reror copy of The RESISTER, Vol.I, No l I like it! Cetr I be on your h"iling list?

Dr. Susan HuckAssocirte Editor

Crnservative Review1307 Do[y Madison Blvd.

Mcl_€aq VA 22101

Q03) 893-BA2

For ot)vious (to us) rE€soDs we d,o not keep nailitrglists. Vr'e will howcver, seetoit6atyoue&ircludcd in ttc disriburion sc,heffc xDd realive a gr€ycopy. We do ask ltet if you intend to nelriotr TheRESISTER in yor lntblicarior rhar you have rheprofessional coutcsy to let us review said mrtedalfitsl. Mail rcaches us througtr a rather iDdirecr elldlabodous rcu@, so give us at le€st four weeks torespood. --THE EDITOR

NEW WORLD SLAVERY

,16&tuewNq{|uposs€ssed sufdcicnt power to eoforc€ world pe€c€ they wouldalso bave tbe power co €nforcc wodd dictltorship? Apparedlythis hct do€s trol Eouble oul governDeot.

SiDce 196l the U ted States DEartnent of Stat€ hasbeen Dgodaling xwxy our trational sover€igtrty itr dle trrme of'World Peace' co6iste$ with the pmvisions of the Kemedy

VoL I, No. 2 RESISTER. / 6

aO-iolstratioo Cocu-eot entitled 'FREEDOM FROM wAR."I am Do rnajor league hislorian bua I am old enough to

rememtrer that 'pece" was the comrnunist calch phras€

rD€anir8 oD€-world commuoism.Does anyone else stop to comider lhat the Uruted

Srates is the only non-socialist coutry in the world and UniiedNations edicts on arms control, enviro n€ntalism, and 'human

rights' arc always focused on, atrd co rary to the interesls ofthe Uoired Staies?

'FREEDOM FROM WAR' outlined a dree-stageevoluaion designed to make the UN the sole legitimate user offorc€ on ihe face ofth€ plaret. Keep itr nind that this was the

US Departnenl of State's vision for the futurc of country in1961.

Phase One ess€ntially elimimtes the notion of national

sovereigrty by enforcing unilateral disarmament whilestrenSthening UN "peac-€keeping' powe6.

Phase two rcinforc€s UN "p€ac€keepinS' bytransferdng all legitinacy for th€ exercise of military force tothe United Nations. We are alrcady thefe. Note thatregsrdless of the sovercign intere$s of this coulry duringDESERT SHIELD prcsideot Bush wetrt $oveliry to iheUoited NatioDs for p€rmission to act.

Pbase tkee will pernit naaiols to retain only thos€

forces aod afmametrts neaessar', for the mainteDance of intenalorder. Only tle UN will rDaintain arn0s and forces nearqsary

to wage offensive war u:der the control of it's "Peace Force. "Now, the US has etrdorsed a workiry paper s€€king

global gun control submitted to the UN DisarmanentConmissioD by Patti l-oodoDo, a colunbia! UN Diplonat.Otr May 9, 1994, The Unittd States allow€d consetrsus

adoptiotr of the wortitrg paper which puts dooestic gutr

coDtrol otr par with nrcl€ar disernatDetrr.Ceorge PrescoaUSAJFKSWCS

THE DANGER OF PRECEDENCE

I hope you bave been folowing tte O.J. Sirysotr ciseat leest throug[ fte prelimiMry b€aring. The key is$r€ wesFoultr ADcndEnt rights. For the sake of clerity the FourthAfieodmetu stat€s:

me right of fue people to be teare in theb Wrsont,houses, pcpe6, aid 6ecls, againtt unreasonabk serchas andseiarcs. shell tut be iolaled, and no $'arra s shall issu4 baupon probable caxse, supportd b, oodr or 6mation, andpanicala , daoibing ne phce to be seorched, atd thepe6oN or things to be seizd.

Now tbat we'rc on the same slEet of music, sotre ofthe argum€nls made by O.J.'s muncil meke bottor setrso. TheFourih Ameodmem says in ess€rce tbat, if you want to segrch

a rcsrderre, you D€ed a warrant. Quite plain and six0ple. Itsays rc&ilg about €xig€nt (urged or critical) circumslancesnor do€s it infer tiem.

The argurent of exig€nt circumstances has d€veloped

Iiom "legal prec€derce." An analogy for pre.edence is as

follows: Your moth€r tells you to stay oul of the cookie jar orsbe will beat your butt. You get inlo it and 8et caught. Mom

is in a good mood and do(5n'l beal you. The next time she

calches you she's argry but you plead it€c€d€nc€- toprevent your beating. You got away with it the fiIst time so

why not this tirne?It is the srme with the legal syst€m. When the police

violate the Consiitution, aod 8et away with it, ftw case lawfollows ard prec€dent for the action is e$ablished.

What xbout exigent circumstafte? It has becorne a

$andard police tactic to subve( the intent of the FourlhAmendm€nt prohibitiom against unwarranted search atrd

I am not here to say the polic€ should not enter aplac€ ifa true crisis is teking place. However, the limit ofiheir action though should be to s(op the disturbanc€, securc

the scene and requ€st a warant if prcbable cause exists. Butariny blood spot on a vehicle door should not b€ brought beforerhe court as ihe basis for ihe police or distnct attorney's clarmof "erigeni circumstancc, "

Neither this, tror the claim of someone else in danger,holds 6ny crcdence. The polic€ did not race to the home ofNicole's "ftiend' and cnsh in to see if everyone was safe.

What abou! equal treatm€nt under the law?O.J. Simpson's Foulh Amendmetrt rights were clearly

violated. You mey not care for Simpsotr or you may everr sxy,'he is Suilty so who cares how he was brouSlt dowtr. " Thatattitude is precisely the problem. It is better for e guilty Ea!to go ft€e than have our dghts traryl€d upon by ttre Dlinionsof so-cal€d justicr. If alry govertrDe4 is alowed to dowbatevEr m€a-sur€s it d€€ms rcc€ssary to bdng order, you catr

rest assured thAa it will be totalitarian aod brutrl."l,exinglon'

USAJFKSWCS

HORROR FILE

Crime Bill Defines The RESISTER asInstument of Terror

SeDator Joseph Biden's SB 226, mw incorporated inrothe Cdme Control Act of 1993, (pass€d by both hous€s ofCon$ess soon !o sign€d by Clinto4, would make publicariotrof The RESISTER an 'inteni' to commit a terorist act.

Sectiotr 8 of Bideo's SB 223 'defi6' intent itr thiscotrtext as 'appear to be intended (l) to intimidate or coerce aciviliatr poFulatioq (2) to inlluence the policy of a governrD€dby intimidation or c.oercios. "

This includes, but is not limited to; d€rbonsEatiors,pickets, conputer bulletio boards, publicatioDs, ass€mblies,and s"€ech.

VoL I, No. 2 RESISTER / 7

First Amendment Trial Balloon

Harry w. Maneno (JD) is being "detained. in ameximum s€curity federal prison, without bofld, for producitrgald s€lling a video tape about tho Constitution entitled'Sovereignty vs Slavery.'

Mr. Marrello was indict€d by a federsl Grand Jury oncbarges of coospiracy, wire fraud, and rneil flaud because hefoses a 'danger to society' for s?r€adiry 'prcpagalda.' Mr.Manero's message? The priDacy ofde idividual.

The federal crime bill desigBtes anti-govemD@ntspeech, such as prcclaimitrg the desirability of revolutionagaiNl tyranny, as 'mateial suppo( to l€rrorism,' and makesRICO forfeiore gxsible for statemenrs made up to 4 ye3lsPRIOR ro ih€ etractmeot of rhe bill.

This is EX POST FACTO legislarion.

Equal Opportunity Poverty

The decent middle class neighborhood you live in halrcw been dedgnated by the f€deral govemment as a 'lowpoveny ara.' This n€atrs your neighborhood is unfairlydivided ftom ioner city slums by a lack of irpom€ituegntion.'

HUD now cotrsideN almost every neighborhood inAoerica as an unlair housing oa*et, lieble to forcedituegration by th€ whim ofthe federal govemnrent. If youfirn propeny itr a middle-class &ighboftood you are rcwSuilty, by deftulr, of the uDdefi!€d chsrge of recisn"

B€twe€o 1t0 ad 1976 HUD tnosfonDed DeaoitaDd Chicago itrto giatrt sluos by r€distdbutiog welhEmoochers atrd their crimitral, gary, aDd drw rddict hitcnhikento afflueat Deighborhoods. HUD s€cr€iary Heory Cisnerosard HUD sssistsnt soq€tary Robena Achtenberg 6gule thatwas not good e@ugh.

Altruist egalitrriadsn d€mands that ev€ryoDc live inequa y crime-ridden sluns.

"This Isn't Somethiflg You Needto llave in Your Library"

Major Mark Prugh, actitrg on ahe instructions ofColonel Riciard S€im, Commatrd Judge Advocate, UnitedStates Army John F. Kenn€dy Sp€cial Warfare Ceoter endSchool, coDfi!€at€d the USAJFK Spocial Warfare CeDt€r adscxool Marquat Meoonal uln ry s wcll tlumb€{l retercnc€coby of The RESISTBR. (Fm the edification of our civilianr€aders ite Comn"nd Judge Advocare, COL Seim, wo*sexclusively for, and acts on behdf of, Mejor GercGl WilliemGsllisoo, Commander. USAJFKSWCS.) Wht is panicularlyobrcxiciuiis th;r ir was e grei copy: in orher worG, a!original. This outnge occunrd Thusday, 25 August, 1994.

Our observers rcporr that MAJ Prugh asked for thedesk copy of Th€ RESISTER ant, haviry obtaired ir ftom Oe

unwitting duty libnrian, tumed ro walk out the door wirh it.When advis€d that the issue in quesrion wes rhe library's onlyr€fercnce copy and was not to tle rcmov€d flom the premisesPrugl retuflFd lo the desk and scrawled a note shting who hewas and tlnt he was actinS "per COL S€im's instructions,'while stapling his card to the nore. When asked why hewas t{king the library's ooly copy he .€plied, 'The isn'tsomething you need to have in your library. "

We will point out rhat the Marquat Memorial Libraryco aitrs the collected wo.ks of Marx, knin, Stalin, Mao,Hitler's Mein Kampf, and at le{sl something rcpros€nting rh€philo6ophy of every brand of collectivism, socialism, statism,tribalism, aDd anarchy. Obviously, the Chain of ComnandcoNideN those works perfectly acceptable readinS for oursoldieN.

The RESISTER'S message of strict constitutioulism.isolationism, laissez-faire capitalism, iDdividual rights, andrepublicanism, is considercd subveNive.

It is tenpdng to hold MAJ pruSh accountable for hisaction, bul ktrow thar he was just an 'enand boy sent bygrccery clerks;' an errand boy who held ,rnaodatory_'Honos€xuality Seositivity Training' for all USAJFKSWCSinstructo.s and staff thmughout August, 1994.

Major ceneral Galrison's eddress is:

ComrnderATTN: AOJK-COUSAJFXSVr'CSFo( Bragg, North Carolina28307-50m(9r0) 4324404

RUMORS

The RESISTER a Governmenr Plot?

Major Robert Tifhny, FA, Doctdne Divisiol,USAJFKSWCS, has opi&d tbat The RESISTER is publishedby ihe Clinton adrinstration es e v€hicl€ d€signed to 'smokeoua" dissi(btrE atrd subversive!€$ in the military.

NICE TRY BOB, NOW THAT YOU'RE RTTIRINGWE HOPE YOU DON'T HAVE TO MAKE AUVING BY YOUR ANALYTICAL SKILI.S.

-TIIE STAFF

U. N. Fomenting Insurgencies

An interestiog tidbit surfaced in THE NEWFEDERALIST, dared Jule 13, 1994. h s€e4s the UoiredNations Huoan Developm t Prcgnm bas been 's1udyitrg, theitrtenal conditions of various Third World counldes.

In the cas€ of Mexico, tbe UNHDP conatucted anexhustiv€ study of 'human conditiotrs' iD Stat€ of Chiapas

Vol. I, No. 2 RESISTER / 8

during the spring of 1993. Seven nronths later, in Jalruary

1994, Mexico was fac€d wifi an insu.gency in that stat€, l€d

by the masked (and alleg€d homosexual) pip€ smokingMarcos.

We have reproduced an anicle leveling the charge ofUN spo[sorcd iNurgencies by a Mexican jounelist, Lioda de

Hoyos, on page 12. Normelly, we care less wbat happeos irMexico. But b€aause AsErican soldieE are now routinelydeployed to dung beaps by our socialist govenme to "belp'mis€rable, starving, Third world ab6tractio6 al the behest ofthe United Natioos, we tbought you should s€e what you'r€getting into and why. -.ASSOCIATE EDITOR

Primer Shortage

For the past eight months it has been almostimpossible to buy prin€rs in atry rc{sonable quaotity. TheRESISTER begar qui€tly cenwssing manufacturers,wholesal€E, and retailerc to find out why.

Retaile6 and wholesalers were patiendy weitiry forcanridg€ manufacturers to finish 6eir xnDual production whichthey (the distributors), said usually reduc€d primer availabiliryu il erly summer. WheD we hlked to the manufactuers theysaid rhe U.S. governnre hed placrd orders for a-mmuniriotrSIx TIMES theil normal emual comDiission. Some quickfourrh-grxde meth coryleted the story.

Itr a mrmal year, the fedenl govemm€nt puichases

approximately I .7 million rourds for its myriaduDcoostitntioMl law eaiorcement egeicies. This ercludes thevarious arselals which produce eD[rlnition fo. &e nilitary.This ye{r the fedoral govemmed puclased over orcBILUONrouds. It gets uglier. This year the fedenlgovertrment b€gatr almilg tie IRs ad tlle EPA. The Fed'sare also erpandiry the FBI'S HRT, the BATF'S enforementbrarch, ard DOE'S private rrmy. Juxtapose this with tbeftdel?l govcmDeDt's tl€@rmiDation to abrcga@ the SecondAmetrdo€nt.

ff anyoE has idormrtion pcrtaidng !o &is is$ewdte us. _THE EDITOR

National Forest HLZ'S

When udll are deployed on tTF-Six missiom tftey arercutitr€ly r€quircd to locate aDd suvey Helicopter hrditrgZooes withitr Natio@l Folests whicl are the[ turD€d over rotbe NalioMl For€st S€rvicr durhg O€ po61 miision AAR.Tbe official explrration ir that Oese HLZ'S will bc us€d byfuNre missio[s as MEDEVAC dusr-off sites.

Debrieh of lersonnel rctumiry ftom JTF-Sixmissions bdicate thar the purpos€ of the Natioul Forcst HLZslrveys is not qui@ so b€nign. The PIR atrd IR for JTF-SixOPORDS {i€qledy r€quire udls to repon on the locations,msber$, dr€6s, ad types of afirs ceried by civilias withitrNational For€sts, and specificdly ad&ess r@dng atry type of"pannilitary" activity. This i ormation is included in the

posrmissioo INSUM wldch is then turned over to JTF-Six J-2ud is accessible by Operation Alliance; in other words. the

FBI. BATF. US Border Patrol, DEA, among oihers.Couter drug or intenul securily? lf you have b€en

recently deployed on a ITF-Six missioo or an RSU rotationand some of your mission and repodng requircments did notquire squire with ihe official lie, wrile us. --THE STAFF

FIELD REPORT: SECOND AMENDMENTRALLY

byAlexander Davidson

Washington D.C., 14 August, 1994

One of the oddities of poliiical d€monstrations is thatthose who do not actually work for a living have the tine.supporting ftont o.gaoizations, atrd r€sources doDated byaltruists, do-goodem, atrd other socialists, communists, andinflu€nce peddiers to form mobs 10 protest this or the otherpercrived iD€quity while carlying cadboard plac{rdsdenanding that groudl€ss theories, mindless philosophies, andratrge of the momena whims b€ given the sao€ status as fact,reeson, end reality,

Thos€ of us who ac$ally wo.k to e{m ouI living donot have the idle lurury to demonstrate in defeose of ourinaliesable objective rigbts.

The Second AEeodrneut Rally drew, we estimate,about 2,000 Fople. (Ow eslimate is based otr tho areamvered divided by aproriortely 3 square net€$ per peNongiven tbe area cover€d ad m€€n dis?ersiotr). Bus loads ofpeople anived ftom Otio, Ilinois, atd Nod camlila.Individuals drove fiom as ftr eway rs Colorado atrd Alabama.

We edoit beiry a little disappoitrt€d in ihe tumou!whetr we h€ard the 6r$ reports ftom our observers at tterally. But upon rcflectiotr we quickly c{me to r€dize tbatpeople who ar€ in the right seldom think they arc coq)€lled topmve it to others. It is the lfur who must shout down theEudftl to bc h€ad, the iDcoqete[t i{ho musl denigrate ftework of the coq€tetrt ro be r€cognized, rDd fte i@t whomust eDslave the able to feiga $rcc€ss.

While 6€ firmbers of hotrfst, coEpetefi, and ablecitizeos who cade to ihe nlly may Dot be rema*able, ihe hctthai mo6t of them werc willitrg to Diss the following day oftwo of wo* to defend their right to befi afms agaimtgoveroment tyranny is.

The media was coDspicuous by thefu absence, Notorc tr€ws agency adved to r€cord 3trd report on a nlly by lawabidhg citizoos opposing govemment abrcgation of theirrights. lf an equrl number of homoGeruals, drug addicts,comnunists. bean curd ertels, adrDal worshipers, sritroritytribalists, oi commotr sEeet garbage had $aged a nlly thecarion e{ters of the media would have been therc in forcecluckitrg their tongu€s wondering fiow thes€ people cruld havesuffercd for so long.

Of the distitrguished guests who wer€ iNited to aflctrd

Vol. I, No. 2 RESISTER / 9

only G. Codon Liddy app€ared atrd spoke. His nressege wasclear atrd srcciDct: 'You have no moml obligation to oteyuconsritutiond laws. Whetr they tell you to register you_r

fireams-dotr't. When they tell you ro tum in yo|jl 6r€arrns-don't.' No argum t form us-

Rush Limbaugh was too busy signing books inColondo.

Therc was e mosi$ent uoderlying 6eme that broughthese people together to aak€ a stand for the rights, udfiedthem in 6efu outrage agei61 oul unc4ostiturioul fededlgov€mcot, ard kept th€m focused otr the very reeson whyrh€ S€cod Amnd@nr is the teystone of the Bill of Rights-

waco defiDed in oDe act, ahe federal goverlmetrt'strue position on rhe rights atrd idMdual liberties guaranteedto all fi€ecn by fte coNtitution.

Weco put the fear of tyrrmical goveaoment itrlo everyratioMl person in tbis cautray. If thcr€ was a *ar cry tomobilize rcsist&c€ to the vagaries of the federel goverolent,ihe Doo{bjectivity of oul undefinable, utr-judicable, andthereforc uojust fiIearms laws, that q,ar cry is 'REMEMBERwAcol'

There is a small bur growiog s€gment of the Americanpublic who are awfie that ahe BATF thugs $.ln assaulted acomflrrity of Chdstian law abiding citizens were trained adadvised by memb€rs of 3d Special Forc.s crcup (Airbofie),under the euspices of Olpr.tion AlliaDce and Joitrl Task Force- Sir. Ic was with great iuterest that oul observers at th€SecoDd AfieDd@ft Rally lsrned tbat Mr. Ja6 pate, aftee-la&ejournalist who uncovercd tbat fact ad broke &estory in SOLDIER OF FORTLINE, would speak ar the ra[y.

Mr. Pate besan bis sleec! et a disadvantrge:everythirg he bad to say about Waco had .k€edy b€en said byKfut Lyotrs, ftom Blac& MouDt3itr, NC, one of the defEnsoattoneys &)r the Waco defeDdanrs. But thcn, Pare paused,h€ld above his head a grey docrlent end aolounced:

'Therc is a cdsis of co@ard itr our slaDdirg .my.I am holdiog a copy ofThe RBSISTER: The O6cirlPubtc{ioD of tle Specid Forcrs U*rgrou.d. This le6or,wrioelr by a soldier from tle 7th SFcial Fora€s CIoW,expresses the concelns of soE rreNnbers of the SpecialOpentions Coomunity about a goverreot a.nd it's appointedoffic€rs wtro ord€t them to oppress &e citizeos of thfu coulrtry:

My ftiends ad I are all in xgreeneoq olugovermnt is geuiDg out of coDEol and the fiIsl liDewe ue givetr atr oder to disarm the pitiatrs of thiscourtry we are 8oi[8 to desen ad join whateverSuerilla Dove@nt deeoDstrat€s it is 6gbtin8 tor€srore tbe prieiples this coutrtry wds fouDded on... !

As our observers edg€d thcir nriy out of tle crowduoder the cover of HC aDd viofi sinle, mired. o rheir breafin aodact, they head tfie crowd ro€. it's approvel.

APPROVAL. For drc fi$t tine in 200 yearselomcus of Unit€d States AImy opeoly pobliciE their iDtetrt ioresist the policies of the fedenl governDcnt and Amedca,l

citizens publicly dernonstrate their aF,proval.Whr? Because most people rre afaxid of the

governrnent. Il is a very slbde fcxr. It is a f€ar rcsultingform the urcenainty of legal status bomof the incoqrehe$ibiliry of our laws and their whimsicalapplication aod enfora€nent

On€ of our staff members has rernerked thaa hismother persistontly says, 'Don'! say thiogs like that over thephone!" Anottrer poitrts out tbat no6t p€ople are afraid rojoinpolitiaally active orgarizatiotrs berause they want to wind upon "their' list.

The RESISTER has one aoswer to tho6e aDd otherobjections to re6isting tyramy-"You behave like someone wholives in a police state. "

During their debriefing one of our observers srated, 'Idon'r kDow how he (Parf) eor hold of ir (Ibe RESISTER).Whetr he nentioned Special Forc€s ahere were mulmu$ of'taitoIs,' ad'Quislings.' But when he rcad the letter ftom'John' the crowd went qazy becausc Oey foutrd out we (TheResistaoce) were with lhcm. It nay te.ke twenty years, trutwe're going to win...I ktrow that now.

AMEN

'Assault Gun" Ban Analysisby

"MinutemaD"3rd SFG

The recenl bon otr mittary style semi-automadcw€{pons is frr mor€ oremus tba.n evcD prcs€cordAnredrt)elt oasadzalioDs pr€sim. Pld in codext withClintotr's AFil t9, 1994 rEmert, '...lter€'s too much Frsotralfr€€doo"' and S€nator Biden's rcc€ srstemt dur drc ftderalgov€rntred will decide what the 'people !€€d,' the pueose ofthe b€r is clear.

S€mi-automatic firurms cosc hudr€ds, if trotthors8ldl, of dollaN. The Eajo.ity of lhes€ w€apotrs are trorowned by coUecto6, who er€ relrtivoly well off' a[d whoobtritr 6em for lheir owrr esotedc purposes. Nor er€ theyowoed by 'tfte poor,' who could not hope to splurge on alr$E00 co $3000 firEalm. TIrcy ale owEd by &e niddle classihad-wortiry, law abidilg propdty o*Ders.

Sooe poss€ss them out of m$afgia for their Dilitrrysorvice, soDe for w€eketrd pliDkitrg, soD for coqEtitiveshootitrg, soDc fur sclf prot€ction, a few for hnnri'lg. Theirmotive is in€leva|rt because it is tleir CoD6titutiorel aDdDarunl righr to olr,tr lh€m.

No\,, coDsider the l€islative rssetjlts agaiDsl theniddle-class for the pasl thiny y€als. EariroDmedal laws areAnti-pmperty. Ecotrooic laws are anti-capitalism" CivilriShts lavrs erc rnti-individdal. Educatim laws ate anti-rc€son.The sole pupoce of f€der:rl anti-gun laws is anri-resisdict.

Therc is a growin8 Eovenetrt tlrcughout A.Driaa tofo|rE locd oili.i,.. This movemeDt is tro( uivecal, DOr is itweu advenised, bor it is expandiDg witl rhe growitrS

Vol. I, No. 2 RESISTER / IO

;gnition that tlrc nyriad ircomprdEnsible laws pass€d inthe last thirty years were nev€r intended to s€rv€ their stat€dpurpose.

If you arc not a member of a lxrn-state approvedmilitia, join on€. If there is none where you live, formone,-in s€cret. when th€ tine cornes we will find you adassist you.

Blind Tnnsmission Broadcast

Melvil:Paragraph 2 by sentence- Thank you. You'te not the

only oD€, We call th€m "tobacco spitters.' Whom,Lately, has seid, "No?" wE know 6at. I kD€w him;he fell into the saine trap as the 'centurions,'Parigraph 3, start sentence 2, You are conect, we'reworking on it. W€ know. Your're right; we willwhen it's possible. w€ kDow. Thaok you.P.S. So are Datry others.

SGM:Ref€rence our telephone conveAation of l8 August,1994: wana to put theory into practice?

Bruce:It is impolite to discuss tradeqaft. Re: l) Hewouldtr't; 2)Yes, yes, oo: 3) No; iffelevaD4 4) YoumeatrNOM DE PLUME. Would you take the

chatrce? You mean: AGENTS PROVOCATEURS.Kyle:

Your plufibing business ed advertising are goinS romryromise you, It s til]'e to $art behaviog as youbelieve.

KeviIYou can do mor€ for us outside. Mr. Chad€sPetersoo will cootad you sooo. You are in a uniqueposiaiotr. If you are int€rested iquirc .bour Mr.Petersotr's re{ding babi6.

Mic.hael:Brief re$nre r€qok€d.

'Setrtioal'We Deed to talk. D€trils fonhconiry. Do not tellanyNy. Do not invite ftieds.

PEACEKEEPING: What For?

Joseph Thornas

The rccent orgy of anicles about United Nationspeacrkeeping end huDrnitariar assistase b SPECIALWARFARE magazine reve3ls a gre3t deal about wher€ iheUnited Scares military itr geoerrl. and Sp€ciai Forc€s inpanicular, is being le€d.

IDstead of foclsing on the defeose of this natioo rDdthe prol€ction of vital Utrited States i €rcsts the U.S. military

has become a slav€ servic€ for drc wealih ralistributionsch€mes of idenutionalists aod gaogs of weepiog do_gooder

mystics. One need simply note tbe circling of media

carrioo-€atels to prqjrct in which Tbird world toilet thes€

altruists will next flush hundreds-of_milliotrs of tar dollars and

ihe lives of U.S. service men.Peacekeeping is a monurnenul tuaud- lt has nothing

ro do with peace and eveo less with keepiry it. Peac€keepitrg

, and it's bastard offsprings- peacernaking &trd p€c€enforc€ment--conslitutes nothing less thatr the abrogatioo ofnatioDal sovercigoty. The iLsinMtion of U.N. agencies intothe poLrical fabric oftbe Mdons il 'helps.' the erproprialioDand redistriburion of propeny and wealth, aod tbe

esiablishrneat ol'democralicaily elect€d' socielisl Sovernmensare actiotrs that speak louder thao the mushy rh€toric of U.N.ch€erleaders in the f€deral goverDirerrt.

In somalia eighteen Anerican slave-soldiers under

U.N. mrffDand died, and seventy-sev9tr w€re woutrded, forexactly NOTHING. They w€re not herc€s, they were

sacrificial aninuls, At th€ same aime the circus srdesbow nunhutrt for Adid was in full siwing, the Umted Nations was

paying him over US$ 100,m0 monthly in protection money so

altruists could deliver food i() hoakls of starving inelevancies.Vice President Gore co$oled the per€nts of the victin$ bytellitrg them their sotrs died "in the service of the UnitedNations.' CIhe RESISTER is reliably itrfomed it is a 8oodthing he had his Secre-t Servic€ hoods wilh him at fte time.)

S€rgea[t Major Steve Buback, a U-N. toady,conve endy sidesteps these hcts in his grcveliry January1994, SPECIAL WARFARE ,Nicle: THE BLUE HELMETS:A HISTORY OF UMTED NATIONS PMCEKEEPINGFORCES. Budack coosiders Somalia a succ€ss.

During the U.N. sponsorcd Korcatr War (which thesocislist Trulla[ called a "polic€ actiotr'), militrry orders addirEctives s€Dt ftom the NCA aDd the Penlagon to comr"n<ieisin Korca wero routinely briefed to U.N. Military StaffCommift€€ rembers. This informalion was lhen relayed to th€

Noflh Koreans atrd the ChiD€se crmmuoists by their ellies, iheSoviet UDion. Litr Pieo, comn,(ler ofconhnnist Chineseforc€s in Korca gloated, 'I would rcver bave nade tlie attack(acro6s the Yalu, ED.) e[d risked my men and militaryrcputatiotr if I had not b€en essured th.xt Washingrotr wouldreslrain G€neral MacAnhur ftom laking adeqoate rct liatoryme3sllEs agarDst my lin€s of supply atrd coomudcation. " Themmber of Americatr soldie$ who died as a lgs:ult of thisfederal govemoeot tleasoo cinnot be calculated.

The tnre intetrl of Unitod Natiotrs 'p€ac€keeping' isbest illustnted by the 1960 - 1964 ONUC (Opelation des

NetioN Unies au Congo), itr what is the arche{ypc U.N. clientslat€ and IMF moD€y sqr,er, Zair€.

wleo Moise lGpeda Tshombe, pro-west andarlti-coDm|list lead€r of Katanga FoviEe d€clarcd secessionand iDdependence ftom the conmudst r€gim€ of PaEicetxmumba, the United Nations, at the behest of Atnericanlib€rals rrd rhe Sovier Union deployed thousands ofpm-mmlnunist thugs on U.S, traosport aircraft to Kataqabeck into lioe. Thousands died il U.N. conc€ntration camps,

Vol. I, No. 2 RESISTER / I I

whiles were routinely nurderEd, civilian facilities werebombed by U.N. aircnn (flown by Czech and Russian't€chtriciais') betw€en July 1960 ard January 1962. ( See:RrBEll, MERCENARJF-S AND DMDENDS, by SmilhHempstone, 1962.)

Never in it's history has the Unit€d Nxtionsidervercd on behalf of a prc-west, prc-capialist oation underrssault from communist subveNiod fiom within or sociatistaggression Iiod wirhout. Wlerc was rhe U.N. ilr Malaysia,Viet Nem, I3os or Cambodia? Objectiotrs that rnember statesmusl app€al to tbe united NatioDs for assista&€ are inelevaotsirce lheir ideoloSicd aggr€ssors, comn,nists etrd socialisrs,cortrolled (and still control) tbe Secudty Courrcil. The U.N.does rct s€Dd pe3c€keepen to protec! Isrsel, but to preservethe lunatic Islamic oations who atlacked her.

For whar reason should the UDired States thmw awxyhundrDds of rnilliotrs of dollars in sorrlled foieig! 'aid" aDddsk tbe lives of Am€ricaa servic€mon to 'save' mobs ofsterving inelevancies ard hoards of suffering abstractions atthe whim of the One World Socialists of ihe United NatioDs?So New Wo d Odei altruists cao feel good about themselves.

There are many who view the mindless whimsy atrdsenseless rationalizitrg of American foreig! policy io gercral,ard United Nations pe{c€keepiog in panicular, as anomdpotent coDspiracy mastemiDded by some malevolenipowerful giant. I aclang irefirtable facrs itr pmof of thiscontentioD The RESISTER Fefers to remain silent. If there isa conspiracy lve believe it is nore a conspirrcy of philosophythet a coDspiracy of mtr.

The R.ESISTER conteods thrt drc truth is far rnorchonible: at de bottom of tle cloyitrg fog of steDch thatsuouods U.N. peace&e€ping and Americ!tr foreign policy is aDesa of scrrryiry coclxoaches.

MOTryE

If you believe the Offrcial Lie thar lhe vsdous ThiidWorld Fibes whicl Fovid€ the U.N. *itl p€aaeleephg foresdo so out of thekindEss of their h€ad, gue€s agrh.'npy doit for youl tex money.

On€ €xaqle itr patticuler is illu$ativ€. WteoZambia seDt its hoodluDs to Mozembique lasl year cachsoldier was paid US$ 300.00 per Dod by |he U.N.. Ofcourse, ttre Zafibiatr govertrmed looted nore thr.tr balf 6atmon€y, but the net r€sult was tlat the d€{ oyed Zsmbialrsoldier's pay more thrn doubled- The added bercfrt *as thatit got som€ of their armed gengs out of the coudry for awhile, thus reducing the tbrcet of e coup.

Therc is atr analogy to be dlawtr here. lf the thugsand hoodluns ofThird Wo d sewers get well paid by theirU.N. maste$ (at l€asl by lhoir standards), that ar least makesthem prostitutfs-a loo$n horcIable plofession.

Udted Shres p€a@ke€pers get no ertra pay. TheRESISTER figures that tlis E kes U.S. Peac€k@e6 littlemore lhan common sEeet sluts-

U.N. PLAN: One World Govemmentby 1995

Linda de Hoyos

The Hunan DeveloprDenl Repo( i994, Rele€sed onJune I, 1994, sets fonh a blueprint to destrcy tbe sovercignmtion-state and replac€ it with a One World UN dictatoEhipby March 1995.

The UNDP repon, endorsed by UN SecreEry4ercralBoutros Boutros-cbali, oudines pla$ for establisbrDed of'world itrstitutions' with powers to dictate policies iogoverurcnt, while simulhneously declaring war on Dations ofthe developing s€ctor.

utrder tie ruse of a coocept of 'human s€curity' designedto rcplacc the imperatives of oatiotral s€curity of sovereigncountries, th€ UNDP report s€ts tie ageoda and protocols forihe March 1995 heads-of'state summit or Social Developnenrto be held in Copenhagen, Detrmark. This sunmit is to followthis Septenber's Cairo ConfererE€ on Population, whercBoutros4hali et al. are dernanding that Mtions agre€ topopuhtion rcduction as the criterion of economic performanc€.The UNDP pmposal, if implemented, would create iheenforc€ment apparatus for such genociald aims,

Specifically, th€ UNDP report calls for the creatior of aworld Court, with powers to stbpoena lations: A WorldPolice; A World Bark, which would give the IntenationalMonetary Fund sol€ power to enforce austerity on tratioos; Aworld Tre{sry; Atr Fanonic S€cudty Cortrcil, with aoandato to iderferc itr ihose stales that do not codorm to UNprotocols for '@uleriotr rcduction' or 'ft€e tra(b'Iiberaliatiotr; A world Trade and Production OrgaDiz&io4which would not oDly rcgulate 'ftee trade" but would alsodrcule Foductiotr quotas to oetioDs,

To fuDd its ODe World govemDr€nt .he UNDP ltportcalls for global taratioD. This is to irclude t xes on pollutiotr,taxes oo 'savings' ftom d€niliuriatioq tares on all foreig!excba[ge treDsectioff, atrd a global i-trcoEe tex on trationswhose people avcrege ar iocoe above US$ 10,000 pe. ye{I.

GeDocid€: The Aim

The UN rcquircs such global power of dictatorship, tberepon mekes clear, itr order to enforce population reduction,The biggest tbrst to 'humatr security,' the repon sut€s onpage 34, is 'unchecked population grotrth.' The r€pon $atestiat by the year 2015, world populatiotr must be stebilized xa

7.3 billion. For lhis gosl to bc If;hed, Darions musl 'c.nlritrhemselves to ... padcipating in arrNal reviews of the 20:20conpact, " to be held as joi dotror-recipient n€etings otr e3chcountry as well as rnnual regiews itr the Economic SecudtyCouncil-

. Furlh€r. the UNDP demaods that, while the UN heighteNits pov/els to militarily interveDe in the soverei$ terdtory of

disnand€d, th€ odiotral secudty strip@. Th€ UNDP repoft

Vol. I, No. 2 RESISTER / 12

lists fiv€ cases in which UN Blue Helinet troops must be

deployed into (he interul cotrflicts of nadons: 'rnass slaughter

of the pofldation of the state, decirnation through starvation orlh€ withholding of health or other services, forced exodus,occup ion atrd th€ deniaj of the righl lo self-dercrmioarioo,(a-nd) etr\,iionmental alestruction.'

To u ersretrd whet this meaos, at the b€h€st ofBritish Prine Minister l,ord Palmemotr, UN 'Pe3ce-makers'would have interveDed to prcl€ct the $ctssion of the

Codederacy ftom the Union dudtrg lhe ADericar Civil war.At tb€ same time, under the tide 'special contributions,' the

UNDP etrdoEes a call by Oscar Arias, former President ofCosta Rica end Nobel Peac€ Pdze wim€r, for developingDatioLs to firlly demobilize their rrmed forc€s. Arias calls fora Clobal Demilitarization Fuod, maDaged by lhe UN, dntwould dish out nooey to developitrg coutries who make

efforts ro 'disam atrd dcebilizr their aru€d torc€s.r€integrate mililary p€ople into society, atrd prorDote gutrconEol.' Thmugh the F.conomic S€curity Council,demiliterization would become a new condition for any sid orloens to developing nadons,

Denund for Disintegration

The UNDP repon has already dr:a*a the wrath of somedev€loping countries for the iDclusion itr the rcport of s 'hitlisf of coutrtdes which the rcport says are €ither in a state ofcrisis, or otr the verge of crisis, arrd thercforc wanant UN'pr€cqtive action.'

Targeted are Afghaoista& Argola, Haiti, heq,MozaDbiqu€, $d!n, Zaire, Bu$rdi, Geoigia, Liberia,Rwarda, rd Tajilisla[ :Ib€ r€port finther cit€s Brszil, SourlAfiica, Egypt, Mexico, aod Nigerie rs vuherrble !odisintegrrrioo due to 'utrequal distibutiotr of resources.' Ofthese Btions E€ypr, Mexicr, aDd Nigeria werc also ta4ets offte 1970's NarioMl S€curity M€Nror-aD(iiim 200, written byHeDry Kissilger, which d€cla.es thel populaiiotr r€dtction is aoatioral sccurity g@l of th€ Unitod Stal€s.

I! the pr€ss coaferere whicl rele€s€d the HuoatrDevelopmed R@r4 UNDP irdex atesigrer Mabubhul Haq,an IMF flo.ky ard foroer Patislad FiDarcr Mitrisl€I h thee{rly 1980's, iDdicated that cormEies which do trot submit tofte parafleters of the UNDP 'Human Dev€lopmcnt Index"will be hit with ilsurgercies rDodeled on tbat of this yeir'sChiapas uprisitrS of iDdigenous people" in routhem Mexico.Haq, i.o hct, r€vealed THE IJNDP HAD DONE ADETAILED ST{JDY OF CHIAPAS SEVEN MONTHSBEFORE THE JANUARY 1994 INSURCENCY WASI-AUNCIIED.

A oere coinciderce? Heq fiuther said the UNDP is nowengaged itr similar 'studies' of regioDal dispariries in Egypt,Nig€ria, and Bnzil.

D€spite the lib€rd distdbutiotr of the word "human'thDughout lhe UNDP repod human beings ere not a highpriority. James Gusteve Speth, b€ed of the UNDP, was theproject dircctor for the Carcr admfuistrrtiotr's Global 2000ftport whicl d€n nd€d lhat the world population be rgduc€d

to 2 billioo by the ye{r 2000.

BOOK R.EVIEWS

THE RIGFT AND WRONG OF COMPULSIONBY THE STATE

by Auberon He6€rt

while not many pople know his name, Englatrd'sAuberon Herben (1838 - 1906) was a profound defeder ofcapiulism. He wrote eloqu€nt, uncornprcmisiDs. andphilosophically insiglttul defeos€s of individual rights.Politics, he says, must be 'lh€ battle of the principles. . .lh€prirciple of libeny againsl th€ principle of force. "

Herbet pres€ds his views intn$igently and

articulate: 'true liberty cannol exist apan from the full rightsof prope(y, for property is the only crystallized form of fi€elaculries...The whole rneanitrg of socislism is a syslemrricglorifrcation of force...No literary phras€s about socialorga sms are potent enoug! to evaporate the individual, whois the pdme, indispeosable, irreducible element.'

HertJen rsdily applies the.se sare principles to showtheevils of unlimiaeddemocratic nrle.'Hor should ithappenthat tle iDdividual should be wilhout rightr, but tbecombination of individuals should poss€ss unlinited dghts?"

But he does oot regard lhe issue of force as , primary,Itrstead, he uDder$ads tbat it depends on something far morcfundanentrl: the val$e of rcasoD. 'Force atld rcasotr-whichlast is tle €ss€M of the floral act--€re at the two oppositepoles,' he argues.'Thewho coqels his Deighbor...treatshin, rct as a being with r€aro& but as an animql itr whomrc€son is not.'

Because of Herbelt's collrmitDent to re{son, religiotrtoo is a larget of his withedry attacks: 'Socialism is bua

Catholicism addrcssing iiself Dot to tho soul but to the selsc ofm€[ " Both ifiplorc orc ro 'rcc€pt ,uthodty, ac.€pt the forcewhich it eqloys, resigtr you$elf to all-powerfirl nsDagers,give W the ft€e cloic€ aid the frEe acr..They both of themseek to secrifice oa&' Th€ basic differ€tr.€, he reoa*s, isthat sociatism 'is a qeed even morc deDigrating tbanC&holicism, but ia offers more tangible bribes for itseccepta[c€. i

Writilg et the end of the l9th century, as attacks oncapitalism begao to s1ir, the u[cooDoll thiDker declares: "h istror lrissez-Aire tbat bas hiled. Tbat would be an ill day fornelr. Whet bas failed is the courage to see what is tnrc atrdspeek it to the people, to poiot to the true remodies.'

PATRIOTS: The Men Who Strnedthe ADerican Revolutiotr

by A.J. IlngSutl

Turn of the evenilg trcws, put down youl novel, andread tlis book. The happeniogs in Patriob are as rcleva asthe day's headlines ad as coryelling as atry 'page-nfDer'-ir

Vol. I, No. 2 RESISTER / 13

is the slory of the events rhat qeated tbe United Stit€s.America's unique revolution was a war guided by

intellectud activisb. The irEiGnts in (his book may secmsimilar to thos€ covered by coDtemporary jourDalists-nalsgotests of unpopular decisioDs; legislatures wratrgling over theimpo6ition of new taxes; soldiers 6riDg ioto a violent mob andirciting fuIthcI denonstr.tions; a rcbellious people taking o\,erthe governdetrt ofa country, Howevet, these events wercdriv€n not by blind emotioos and appalently rardom whimissues-but by cotrscious adhercnce 0o the ideal of individualriCh6.

This history begins with the ideologicil foe€trt of1761. the use of 'writs of assistanc€" -blanket s€archwarr.dr, d€rign€d 0o culb smuggling ad giving tbeir bearo$the right to search any ship or building they choose-waslegally challeryed ss an rssault on AmericrrN' righ6.

llngguth sumffarizes dle crse nade by the Britishattomeyi 'Which was morc iqortanr, prctectitrg rhe libe(y ofand irdividual or colecring &e eres effrciently? Gatheringpublic money must take precedence. " On rhe other had,James Otis, the attorn€y for the colonists, argued that 'everydan was his owtr sovercign. . .No other cre{tue On oarth couldlegitimately challenge a rDans dght to his life, his liberty adhis property. That prirciple, 6at urdterable law, tookprecedence. . .even over the survival of the stat€.'

WheD Otis fitrishd, 'somethiDs profound changedAnericr'-i. e., iDdividud lights had b€eD invoked ro lini!staft power.

The hero€s who made the Revolutiotr were rDe[ likeSaraEl Addrs, the ascetic A[itatr *'ho inflr'Fd the mob inBo6to!-Pe$icl( H€ory, lhe brillia& oralor \f,hose 'Give melibcrty or give G dearh' became tte nlyiDg cry fol ArMic{nooqs-G€org€ Washitrgtotr, who6e paEician imegrity inspi€dhis soldi€xs while his agg€*sive ta4{ics wotr the war-ThomasJefferson, who6e crmDitned to rights persurd€d tteConti!€nal Congess to endoEe his D€clar:atiotr ofhd€eeDdenc€.

Reading &is book will inspirc you.

PERSONAI-S

M.. Richard Wbite's Texas ranch is ideally suited forthe gazing large herds ofcattle.

The King's Mouotain Model Railrcad Club will holdits quarterly m€€cing et the Charloare address. Topic:Swiaching yards or spur lirlqs, which is tle gre{ter nodelingcballenge?

Mr. Howard Devon, of Medfurd Wisconsin, wishesto almouee ihe Medford Gardening Club will trow hold 6eirmonthly meetings every third Wednesday. Th€ nest rDetingwill be a seminar otr suoflowers.

The Sand Hills Bird Watchers Society wil conduct itslst Annual Metrbership D.ive thmughout the monih ofOclober. Clara Miller, vice preside , reminG prosp€ctivem€mb€rs to provide their own optics. The club's GUIDE TOBIRDS will b€ provided et no mst.

IN THE NEXT ISSUE:

. How the S€cond Amodncnt Will B€ Abrogated ByUN Treaty

r Why NAFTA is Arri-Capitalism

* How Democracy Subvens the Constitution

* The Tru€ Naore ofRigbts

-phs-

Ooi Usud F€atures

Ask for the Wider lssuc h JatMry; soDebody will bavo it.

IIRLER DTTIA!IIIiO AEUGNKETTD ATRE1IIXAMICA IIBTI.AzoRTP ltI{vNJI,EBSU Q\?I:I

LRCRT AIINRSDITGI SPYEATNRXF VITWOLNMIrAP EISOTODSJU TYISNOMSTG INWR

wxIIP CSCIRMERYA I{UYIITIIICAH IIDTIABROYA I{IAPAAKIRD BYDJCSCEGR RELRH

Vol. I, No. 2 RESISTER / 14