THE RELATION BETWEEN DIET AND DENTAL CARIES AMONG …Dental caries is a multifactor disease which...
Transcript of THE RELATION BETWEEN DIET AND DENTAL CARIES AMONG …Dental caries is a multifactor disease which...
LITHUANIAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL ACADEMY
FACULTY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
SHILPA G.MIRAJKAR
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DIET AND DENTAL CARIES
AMONG SCHOOL CHILDREN
IN THE CITY OF CHENNAI, INDIA
Master Thesis
Thesis Supervisor
Professor Apolinaras Zaborskis
KAUNAS, 2014
2
SUMMARY
The Relationship between Diet and Dental Caries among School Children in the city of
Chennai, India
Shilpa.G.Mirajkar
Academic supervisor Prof. Apolinaras Zaborskis.
Lithuanian university of Health Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Preventive
Medicine. Kaunas:2014
AIM. The aim of the present study was to determine the relationship between diet and dental
caries among adolescent school children, between the age group of 13 to 14 years in the city
of Chennai, India
OBJECTIVES. To find out the characteristics of diet pattern among school children; to
analyze the prevalence of dental caries among school children; to determine the association
between of diet and dental caries.
METHODS. The survey was conducted in the city of Chennai, India. A total of 200 children
participated in the survey between the age groups of 13 to 14 years from private and public
schools. In each of these age groups an attempt was made to include equal number of male
and female subjects. Questionnaires were filled by the children and dental examination was
done by dental surgeon with help of two assistants, which were recommended by WHO oral
health assessment. Statically data was analyzed using the statistics packages spss17.0for
windows.
RESULTS. The diet pattern of Indian school going children aged between 13 to 14 years was
not healthy among the boys and girls. Children under the poor socio-economic category
consumed more healthy diet followed by the rich and average socio-economic group and
consumption of unhealthy diet was more among the rich socio-economic group followed by
average and poor socio-economic group. Children in the public school consumed healthy
food more frequently than children from the private school (51.2% and 45.3% respectively).
Prevalence dental caries was more among the boys when compared to girl (54.0% and
46.0%). The children belonging to the low socio-economic status had higher caries
prevalence than those belonging to the high socio-economic status (58.1%vs43.2%). Caries
3
prevalence was more among the public school children when compared to private school
(53.0% and48.0%). Caries prevalence was lower among healthy diet patterns. A correlation
was seen between unhealthy diet consumption and caries, with the prevalence of dental caries
increasing with increasing exposure to unhealthy food. The unhealthy food consumption was
found to have a highly significant relation with the socio-economic status.
CONCULSION. Nutrition habits of the majority children did not meet the recommendations
for the healthy nutrition. Nutrition education and counseling for the purposes of reducing
caries in children is aimed at teaching the children and their parents the importance of
reducing the frequency of exposures to unhealthy diet.
4
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………….5
1. THE AIM AND THE OBJECTIVES………………………………………………………..7
2. LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………………………………….. 8
2.1 The dental caries process………………………………………………………............9
2.2 Effects of dental caries………………………………………………………………..10
2.3 Dietary Factors in the Initiation and Progression of Dental Caries…………………...11
2.4 Types of Food Products which play a main role in the development of
Dental caries………………………………………………………………………..12
2.5 Eating Between Meals……………………………………………………………….....15
2.6 Dietary fluoride and water fluoridation……………………………………………….15
2.7 DMF Index…………………………………………………………………………....16
2.8 Prevalence of Dental Caries among School Children in India……………………….18
2.9 Socioeconomic factors responsible for the prevalence of
Dental caries among school children…………………………………………… ……….18
2.10 The impact of dental caries on quality of life………………………………… ……19
3. MATERIAL AND METHODS
3.1 Research design and sampling ………………………………………………………..21
3.2 Organizing the survey…………………………………………………………………21
3.3 Implementing the survey……………………………………………………................22
3.4 Measurement criteria…………………………………………………………………..23
3.5 Statistical analysis…………………………………………………………………......24
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 To find out the characteristic of diet pattern among the gender, schools, social
economic
status……………………………………………………………………………………..25
4.2 The prevalence of dental caries among gender, schools, social economic
status…………………………………………………………………………………… .32
4.3 The association of diet and dental caries……………………………………… …....35
5
5.CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………………………40
6.PARTICLRECOMMENDATION………………………………………………………41
7. REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………… 42
6
INTRODUCTION
Dental caries is an ancient disease, dating back to the time that agriculture replaced
hunting and gathering as the principle source of food. Diet plays a central role in the
development of dental caries. Dental caries is considered a major public health problem
globally due to its high prevalence and significant social impact. World Health Organization
reports 60-90% of schoolchildren worldwide have experienced caries, with the disease being
most prevalent in Asian and Latin American countries [WHO, 2008].
Dental caries is a multifactor disease which occurs due to demineralization of enamel
and dentine (the hard tissues of the teeth) by organic acids formed by bacteria in dental
plaque through the anaerobic metabolism of sugars derived from the diet. When sugars or
other fermentable carbohydrates are ingested, the resulting fall in dental plaque pH caused by
organic acids increases the solubility of calcium hydroxyl apatite in the dental hard tissues
and demineralization occurs as calcium is lost from the tooth surface. During the past two
decades, increasing levels of dental caries in children and adolescents have been observed in
developing countries, in contrast to developed countries. Among children, adolescents are
particularly at higher risk for dental caries.
Dental diseases are connected to lifestyles, and multiple risk factors may affect dental
health habits and dental health. There are several factors which govern the well being of our
oral health, out of which, Socio-economic status and lifestyle, awareness and education,
familial and physiological well being, dietary and daily habits and area they live, are a few of
them, especially in adolescent children. Those hailing from a higher socio-economic strata,
and urban areas, in spite of having adequate knowledge of the disease, are exposed to the
availability of junk foods and more susceptible to its frequent consumption.
Whereas those from a lower economic group and rural area are not as much exposed
to such food habits and do not indulge in it because of the cost. Although adolescents have a
basic knowledge of dental health, such as importance of proper brushing and diet in
preventing dental caries, many fail to brush their teeth effectively and tend to consume
cariogenic foods. They may underestimate health risks and tend to oppose their parents and
teachers, making it the most difficult period for health education. Children with caries eat
snacks between meals more frequently than those without caries.
7
The primary public health measures for reducing caries risk, from a nutrition
perspective, are the consumption of a balanced diet and adherence to dietary guidelines and
the dietary reference intakes; from a dental perspective, the primary public health measures
are the use of topical fluorides and consumption of fluoridated water.
The main purpose of this study is to find out the co-relation between diet and dental
caries among adolescent school going children, form the private and public schools and
associate the problem to factors such as socio economic status, habits, knowledge and
awareness.
8
1. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
Aim.
The aim of the present study is to determine the relationship between diet and dental
caries, among adolescent children, between the age group of 13 to 14 years in the city
of Chennai, India.
Objectives.
The main objectives of this study are:
1) To find out the characteristics of diet pattern among school going children.
2) To analyze the prevalence of dental caries among school going children.
3) To determine the association between of diet with dental caries
9
2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1. The Dental Caries process
Dental caries occurs due to demineralization of enamel and dentine (the hard tissues of the
teeth) by organic acids formed by bacteria in dental plaque through the anaerobic metabolism
of sugars derived from the diet (Arens U; 1998). When sugars or other fermentable
carbohydrates are ingested, the resulting fall in dental plaque pH caused by organic acids
increases the solubility of calcium hydroxyl apatite in the dental hard tissues and
demineralization occurs as calcium is lost from the tooth surface. The deciduous teeth erupt
from 6 months and are lost by the early teens. The permanent dentition replaces the
deciduous dentition from the age of 6 years and is complete by age 21. Teeth are most
susceptible to dental caries soon after they erupt; therefore, the peak ages for dental caries are
2 to 5 years for the deciduous dentition and early adolescence for the permanent dentition
(Paula et al; 2004). Studies have reported missed school hours, toothache and several
impairments of daily life activities associated with a high decayed component in both primary
and permanent dentition (Jurgensen N et al, 2009). The stage when permanent teeth begins to
show up and assumes full position in the dental arch is the age of adolescence. This age is
very crucial in development as a lot of problems like dental caries, periodontal diseases and
orthodontic problems such as overcrowding of teeth; malocclusion etc. begin to manifest,
bringing changes and altering the facial profile, aesthetic appearance; thereby affecting
certain psychological factors, self confidence and social outlook of the individual and will
have a permanent effect on the psychology of the child throught life if not treated. This
constitutes a growing problem of public health concern as most of the children are affected in
this age group and developing countries face a problem in tackling this situation due to lack
of awareness, neglect when compared to general health problems, lack of expertise and
insufficient budget provided by the government. In low-income countries, the cost of
traditional restorative treatment of dental disease is disproportionately expensive in light of
the low public health priority and it would exceed the available resources for health care. The
large financial benefits of preventing dental diseases should be emphasized to countries
where current disease levels are low (Paula Moynihan and Poul Erik Petersen, 2004).
10
2.2. Effects of dental caries
The assertion that diet plays a central role in the development of dental caries is
unquestionable. The development of caries requires sugars and bacteria. Observations in
humans and animals, have shown clearly that frequent and prolonged oral exposure to certain
carbohydrates and sugars are fundamental to caries activity. Streptococcus mutans and
Streptococcus sorbrinus are important bacteria in the development of dental caries, both these
bacteria readily produce organic acids from dietary sugars and aid in bacterial colonization on
the tooth surface. The bacteria attached to teeth in dental plaque which is found as a thin film
on the surface of the enamel, utilize mono and disaccharides (e.g., glucose, fructose, sucrose)
to produce energy, and acid is a by product of this metabolism. Consequently, the acidity of
dental plaque may fall to a point where the demineralization of the tooth commences. (The
"critical pH" value for demineralization is in the range of 5.2 to 5.5). The initial stages of
tooth loss occur just below the enamel surface and produce a visual whitening of the tooth,
referred to as the "white spot lesion." At this stage of mineral loss, the lesion may not
progress any further, or could even regain minerals (i.e., remineralize) if the cariogenic
environment diminishes. Treating the tooth with fluoride, decreasing the carbohydrate source
to the bacteria, reducing the levels of cariogenic bacteria, or lessening the ability of bacteria
to produce acid are the preventive approaches that can remineralize the initial carious lesion.
However, if disease suppression procedures are not initiated and the acidic challenge is
unabated, the initial lesion will continue to lose mineral. The progressive dissolution of
enamel and loss of enamel surface structure eventually give rise to a frank carious lesion
(Norman Tinanof et al, 2000 ). The process of dental caries is very important to understand
the way most of the constituents of food products such as sugars affect the tooth and also the
effect that habitual consumption of these dietary products exert on our teeth. In today’s
world, children are more exposed to junk foods, colas, sweets and other dietary products
which are easy to access and readily available, making it prone to habitual consumption
which will easily give rise to dental caries. Hence this disease almost becomes like an
epidemic, although it is not transmissible and fatal. In a public health point of view, models,
charts etc. of the dental caries process and the way the teeth get affected by such food
products can be constructed and made use of in conducting public dental health camps,
awareness campaigns, advertisements and models for awareness and education of dental
diseases.
11
2.3. Dietary Factors in the Initiation and Progression of Dental Caries
Sucrose is the major dietary factor affecting dental caries prevalence and
progression (Rugg Gunn AJ; 19963). One example of low consumption is from a study of the
Hopewood House in Australia, conducted between 1947-52. Children residing in this closely
supervised environment consumed diets that were virtually free of sugar and white flour
products. Data collected from these children revealed an extremely low dental caries
prevalence, compared to children attending other Australian schools ( Harris R; 1963)
The effects of high sugar consumption are best revealed from the report of the
classic Vipeholm study (Gustafsson BE et al;1956.). This study examined the effects of the
frequency of sugar consumption, the timing of sugar ingestion and the consistency of the
sugar on dental caries rates. The results showed that the addition of sugar to the diet caused
increased caries activity, but the degree was very dependent on the consistency of the sugar.
Sugar increased caries, most if consumed between meals, and in a form that was retained for
a long time in the mouth, such as toffee. Products that are sticky, retained for long periods in
the mouth, or consumed with high frequency have a higher cariogenicity than foods that are
eliminated quickly from the oral cavity. Therefore, frequent ingestion of foods such as hard
candies and throat lozenges that contain fermentable carbohydrates can be extremely harmful
to the teeth. The conclusions from this study, conducted a half century ago, are still well
regarded today:
1) Only a small increase in caries is noted if sugar is taken with meals.
2) Sugar consumed as snacks between meals is associated with a marked increase in
caries increment.
3) Caries activity is greatest if consumed in the form of sticky sugar-containing candies.
4) Caries activity may vary greatly among individuals.
5) Caries activity will decline with the withdrawal of sugar-rich foods.
The classic Vipeholm study in Sweden and Hopewood House study in Australia are
two major studies which are of public health significance because it brings into light
the detrimental effects of sugars in causing tooth decay. Children generally consume
diets which are rich in sugars like sweets, candies, cakes, colas etc. and a lot of
awareness has been raised since many years about the ill effects of such food products
on teeth. These days especially in developing countries, foods normally consumed in
households also contain certain amounts of sugars which are ingested frequently.
Hence these two studies are of great public health significance when conducting
12
preventive dental health programs especially in schools where the drawbacks of
consuming such diet containing sugars can be addressed.
2.4. Types of Food Products which play a main role in the development of Dental Caries
A lot of evidence shows that sugars are undoubtedly the most important dietary
constituent and the factor studied most often in the development of dental caries. The term
‘sugars’ refers to all mono and disaccharides while the term ‘sugar’ only refers to sucrose, the
term ‘free sugars’ refers to all mono and disaccharides added to foods by manufacturer, cook
or consumer, plus sugars naturally present in honey, fruit juices and syrups and the term
‘fermentable carbohydrate’ refers to free sugars, glucose polymers, fermentable
oligosaccharides and highly refined starches (Paula et al; 2004).
Sucrose appears to be the most cariogenic sugar, not only because its metabolism
producesacid, but mutans streptococci which is the main microorganism which produces
dental caries, can utilize this sugar to produce glucan, a water-insoluble polysaccharide. This
extracellular "glue" enables mutans streptococci to adhere firmly to teeth (Schachetele CF;
1980)
Fresh fruits contain various sugars and may be capable of causing caries under some
conditions. However, fruit juice and flavored drinks, especially aerated beverages like cola
have a much greater cariogenic potential because of their high sugar content and the way they
are often consumed. They are offered frequently to children because of their high acceptance,
low cost, and the belief by parents that they are nutritious (Dennison BA; 1996). However,
this concept is in recent times changing because of an increased awareness about its ill effects
by public health initiatives through programs, campaigns, various forms of advertising by the
media, school dental health check up camps etc.
Milk. Another most frequently consumed food among school children is milk. The sugar
found in milk (lactose) is not fermented to the same degree as other sugars. It may be less
cariogenic because the phosphor-proteins in milk inhibit enamel dissolution and the
antibacterial factors in milk may interfere with the oral microbial flora.
Starch often is regarded as a relatively low cariogenic carbohydrate. It may be highly refined
or consumed in its natural state, it is sometimes consumed raw (e.g. in fruits and vegetables)
but is largely consumed in a cooked form. Human and animal experiments have found that
starchy foods such as rice, potatoes, pasta, and bread have very low cariogenicity. However,
if starch is finely ground, heat treated, and eaten frequently, it can cause caries, but lesser
13
than sucrose. Additionally, starch that is retained on the teeth long enough to be hydrolyzed
by salivary amylase also can be broken down to mono and disaccharides and consequently
metabolized by bacteria. Starchy foods containing substantial amounts of sucrose appear to
be as cariogenic as a similar amount of sucrose. Some argue that cooked and processed
starches enter into the caries process because starches are broken down by salivary amylase
releasing glucose and maltose and that these are metabolized by oral bacteria to produce
acids. All these factors should be considered when assessing the potential and relative
carcinogenicity of starches. Rugg-Gunn (1993) extensively reviewed the evidence on the
relationship between starches and dental caries and concluded that:
1. Cooked staple starchy foods such as rice, potatoes and bread are of low cariogenicity
in humans.
2. The cariogenicity of uncooked starch is very low.
3. Finely ground and heat-treated starch can induce dental caries but the amount of
caries is less than that caused by sugars.
4. The addition of sugar increases the cariogenicity of cooked starchy foods. Foods
containing cooked starch and substantial amounts of sucrose appear to be as
cariogenic as similar quantities of sucrose.
Fruit and dental caries. Fruits may participate in the caries process; however, as consumed as
part of the mixed human diet there is little evidence to show fruit to be an important factor in
the development of dental caries. Animal studies revealed that all fruits cause less caries than
sucrose. Epidemiological studies have shown that, as habitually consumed, fruit is of low
cariogenicity. Dried fruit may potentially be more cariogenic since the drying process breaks
down the cellular structure of the fruit, releasing free sugars and dried fruits tend to have a
longer oral clearance. Studies have shown that, Fresh fruit appears to be of low cariogenicity
and citrus fruits have not been associated with dental caries. Increasing consumption of fresh
fruit in order to replace ‘non-milk extrinsic sugars’ (free sugars) in the diet is likely to
decrease the level of dental caries in a population (Rugg-Gunn AJ; 1993). Although excessive
exposure to fructose may produce dental caries, fresh fruits are likely to be much less
cariogenic than most sucrose rich snack foods consumed by children.
One hundred percent fruit juice has also been associated with caries, but the
relationship is less clear. Data from children aged 2 to 10 years who participated in National
Health and Nutrition.
14
Examination Survey (NHANES) suggest that children who consume more than 17
oz 100% juice are more likely to have caries than those who are high water or milk
consumers (Sohn W et al, 2006). Conversely, in a cohort of low-income African- American
children, 100% fruit juice was found to be protective of caries (Kolker J et al 2007). Given
that 100% fruit juice contains about the same amount of sugar as the average sugar sweetened
beverages (Marshall T et al, 2007) it is important to understand its role in caries.
Carbohydrates. Glucose polymers (glucose syrups and maltodextrins) are increasingly being
added to foods in industrialized countries. Evidence on the cariogenicity of these
carbohydrates is sparse. Studies suggest that maltodextrins and glucose syrups are cariogenic
(Grenby TH et al; 2000) isomaltooligosaccharides and glucooligosaccharides may be less
acidogenic compared with sucrose (Ooshima Tet al,1998). However, there is evidence that
fructooligosaccharides, which are more widely available in foods, are as acidogenic as
sucrose. Nutritional transition with easy access to refined carbohydrates, low use of
fluoridated toothpaste and irregular tooth brushing habits lead to increasing trend in dental
caries in developing countries (Prasai Dixit et al, 2013).
Cheese. Evidence exists that certain foodsbesides milk may be protective against caries. Aged
cheese has been shown to be protective because it stimulates salivary flow and raises the
calcium, phosphorus, and protein content of plaque.
The sugar alcohols (e.g., sorbitol,mannitof, and xylitol) are sweeteners that are metabolized
by bacteria ata much slower rate than glucose orsucroseor not at all. Clinical studieshave
shown that xyIitoI chewing gumeven can reverse initial white spot lesions on teeth.
Dental decay also results in tooth loss, which reduces the ability to eat a varied diet. It
is in particular associated with a diet low in fruits, vegetables and non-starch polysaccharides
(NSP), and with a low plasma vitamin C level (Moynihan PJ et al, 1994). NSP intakes of less
than 10 g/d and fruits and vegetable intakes of less than 160 g/d have been reported in
edentulous subjects. Tooth loss may, therefore, impede the achievement of dietary goals
related to the consumption of fruits, vegetables and NSP. Tooth loss has also been associated
with loss of enjoyment of food and confidence to socialise (Steele JG et al, 1998). It is,
therefore, clear that dental diseases have a detrimental effect on quality of life both in
childhood and older age.
15
2.5 Eating Between Meals
Because refined carbohydrates exert their effect in promoting dental caries by
serving as a substrate for caries-producing streptococci, it is apparent that for older children
as well as for infants that not only the total quantity but the form of the carbohydrate and the
frequency of consumption are important. A single piece of sticky candy may adhere to the
teeth for almost an hour. In the case of sugars that are not in sticky form, a specified amount
consumed at one time is likely to be less conducive to formation of dental caries than the
same amount consumed in small portions throughout the day. Considerable evidence exists
that between-meal snacks favor development of dental caries (Zita et al., 1959; Weiss et al,
1960). Foods to be avoided between meals are the following: sugar, honey, corn syrup,
candies, jellies, jams, sugared breakfast cereals, cookies, cakes, chewing gum and sweetened
beverages, including flavored milks, carbonated drinks, sweetened fruit juices and fruit or
fruit-flavored drinks.(Weiss RL et al;1960) Finally, eating frequency, particularly constant
grazing or sipping of foods and beverages, is also caries promoting. (Gustafsson B et
al;1954,Burt B et al;1988) In a recent study in a diverse sample of children aged 2 to 6 years,
eating frequency was associated with severe Early Childhood Caries.(Palmer C et al, 2010)
2.6. Dietary fluoride and water fluoridation
Increased exposure to fluoride is largely responsible for the reduction in dental
caries. Dietary fluoride principally comes from drinking water, but seafood and tea leaves are
also rich sources. Ingested fluoride becomes incorporated into enamel during tooth formation,
increasing the resistance of the tooth to decay. This pre-eruptive mode of action affects the
primary dentition in utero and the permanent dentition up to the age of 6 years. However, the
main protection from dietary fluoride is the lifelong localized intra-oral effect. Fluoride
promotes the remineralisation of damaged enamel with resistant fluoroappatite and also
inhibits bacterial metabolism of sugars (Murray, 2003). The benefits to the teeth of exposure
to fluoride are therefore lifelong. Where natural water supplies are low in fluoride, it may be
added to an optimum concentration of 1 mg/l as a cariespreventive measure. Murray et al.
(1991) have reviewed the published data on the effect of water fluoridation on caries and
have concluded that on average water fluoridation reduces dental caries by 50%. Water
fluoridation is a cost-effective public health measure because it reaches the entire population.
In a study of 5-year-old children residing innorth east England Carmichael et al. (1989) have
demonstrated that water fluoridation is effective in reducing dentalcaries across social classes
and, in terms of the number of teeth saved per child, the benefits are greatest in the lower
16
social classes. This finding is important because UK national surveys have indicated that
those from lower social classes have higher levels of dental diseases, poorer oral hygiene
practice and are less likely to visit the dentist (O’Brien, 1994).Despite the indisputable
benefit of fluoride in reducing caries, it has not eliminated it. Fluoride repairs the damage
caused by acids produced by plaque bacteria but does not remove the cause of caries, i.e.
dietary sugars. Prevention requires both optimum exposure to fluoride and a reduction in
sugars intake, which are the twomain factors that have been shown to have an additive effect
on caries prevention (Weaver, 1950).India has shown dental caries in
53.8% in 12 year-old children and 63.1% in 15 year-old teenagers A very extensive
and comprehensive National Health Survey [National Oral Health Survey and Fluoride
Mapping. An Epidemiological Study of Oral Health Problems and Estimation of Fluoride
Levels in Drinking Water. Dental Council of India, New Delhi] conducted in 2004, conclude
that a preventive dentistry program, such as water fluoridation, should be initiated to address
this national crisis in dental caries. Schools provide the ideal setting to reach millions of
children and ensure strong foundations for a healthy life at an early stage.
2.7. DMF Index
The Decayed, Missing, Filled (DMF) index has been used for more than 70 years and
is well established as the key measure of caries experience in dental epidemiology. The DMF
Index is applied to the permanent dentition and is expressed as the total number of teeth or
surfaces that are decayed (D), missing (M), or filled (F) in an individual. When the index is
applied to teeth specifically, it is called the DMFT index, and scores per individual can range
from 0 to 28 or 32, depending on whether the third molars are included in the scoring. When
the index is applied only to tooth surfaces, it is called the DMFS index, and scores per
individual can range from 0 to 128 or 148, depending on whether the third molars are
included in the scoring (Cappelli DP et al; 2007).
When written in lowercase letters, the dmf index is a variation that is applied to
the primary dentition. The caries experience for a child is expressed as the total number of
teeth or surfaces that are decayed (d), missing (m), or filled (f). The dmft index expresses the
number of affected teeth in primary dentition, with scores ranging from 0 to 20 for children.
The dmfs index expresses the number of affected surfaces in primary dentition (five per
posterior tooth and four per anterior tooth), with a score range of 0 to 88 surfaces. Because of
the difficulty in distinguishing between teeth extracted due to caries and those that have
17
naturally exfoliated, missing teeth may be ignored according to some protocols. In this case,
it is called the df index. (Cappelli DP et al; 2007)
I. Calculating DMFT: The teeth not counted are unerupted teeth, congenitally missing
teeth or supernumerary teeth, teeth removed for reasons other than dental caries, and
primary teeth retained in the permanent dentition. Counting the third molars is
optional. When a carious lesion(s) or both carious lesion(s) and a restoration are
present, the tooth is listed as a D. When a tooth has been extracted due to caries, it is
listed as an M. When a permanent or temporary filling is present, or when a filling is
defective but not decayed, this is counted as an F. Teeth restored for reasons other
than caries are not counted as an F.(Cappelli DP et al; 2007)
II. Calculating DMFS: There are five surfaces on the posterior teeth: facial, lingual,
mesial, distal, and occlusal. There are four surfaces on anterior teeth: facial, lingual,
mesial, and distal. The list of teeth not counted is the same as for DMFT calculations,
and listing D, M, and F is also done in a similar way: When a carious lesion or both a
carious lesion and a restoration are present, the surface is listed as a D. When a tooth
has been extracted due to caries, it is listed as an M. When a permanent or temporary
filling is present, or when a filling is defective but not decayed, this surface is counted
as an F. Surfaces restored for reasons other than caries are not counted as an F. The
total count is 128 or 148 surfaces.(Cappelli DP et al; 2007)
III. Calculating dmft and dmfs: For dmft, the teeth not counted are unerupted and
congenitally missing teeth, and supernumerary teeth. The rules for recording d, m,
and f are the same as for DMFT. The total count is 20 teeth. For dmfs, the teeth not
counted are the same as for dmft. As with DMFS, there are five surfaces on the
posterior teeth and four surfaces on the anterior teeth. The total count is 88 surfaces.
(Cappelli DP et al; 2007,Edward LO et al; 2007.)
18
2.8. Prevalence of Dental Caries among School Children in India
Dental caries is one of the leading problems of Public health concern, in school
going children as well as in adults. Dental caries is the single most prevalent chronic
childhood disease worldwide( Donahue GJ et al; 2005). The World Health Organization
(WHO) has recognized dental caries as a pandemic and reported its prevalence among school
children to range from 60%-90%. In the developing countries like India the prevalence of
dental caries is very high particularly among the children and adolescents. The prevalence is
even higher in rural people and among school children. Majority of Indian population resides
in rural areas, of which more than 40% constitute children, These children cannot avail dental
facilities due to inaccessibility, financial constraints and stagnation of public dental
healthcare services (Thomas S et al; 2000). Dental caries is not only a medical problem, but
many socio-demographic factors are said to be associated with this. The prevalence and
incidence of dental caries in a population is influenced by a number of risk factors such as
age, sex, ethnic group and dietary patterns. Other factors are, per capita income of the
parents, socio economic status, number of siblings, and oral hygiene habits such as
frequency of tooth brushing, rinsing the mouth and factors such as tooth ache, bad breath etc.
Many studies conducted in different rural and urban populations in India suggest that the
prevalence of dental caries increased with increase with age. Students belonging to the lesser
income group tend to develop dental caries higher than in comparison to students in higher
income group. Usually people belonging to lower income group are devoid of hygienic
practice and they live in unhygienic environment. These factors often lead to dental caries.
Prevalence of dental caries was assessed according to presence of siblings. It is observed that
students having no sibling or one sibling were significantly less commonly suffering from
dental caries as compared to students having more than one siblings. Usually when the
number of children increases, less care is given to each child by the mother and the elder ones
suffer most (Pratiti Datta et al; 2013).
2.9. Socioeconomic factors responsible for the prevalence of dental caries among school
children.
Socio-economic factors have been identified as predisposing factors in the
development of both dental caries and periodontal diseases. Low income, negligence in oral
care and poor education have been reported to influence dental caries and periodontal status.
19
Research in industrialized countries has revealed that children of high social class families
experience less caries than those of lower social classes. However, this relationship appears
to be reversed in the developing countries. (Cyril.OE; et al 1981). This variation in caries
experience and the oral hygiene status in various socio-economic groups are usually
explained by differences in oral habits, sugar consumption, use of fluoride in its various
forms and oral hygiene practices. In addition to this utilization of oral health services has
been related to social class differences in caries experiences. In Brazil, it has been seen that
access to dental care varies among social groups. Children from lower socioeconomic status
groups receive irregular care through the school dental services, which are based mostly on a
pain relief. On the other hand most of the children from higher socio-economic groups
receive regular dental check ups and treatment through the private systems (Maria Cristina et
al; 1992). Individuals from the lower socioeconomic status experience financial, social and
material disadvantages that compromise their ability to care for themselves, afford
professional health care services and live in healthy environment. In addition,low socio
economic status individuals have more fatalistic beliefs about their health and have a lower
perceived need for care, leading to less selfcare and lower utilization of preventive health
services. The possible influences of socio-economic status on dental health may also be
aconsequence of differences in dietary habits and the role of sugar in the diet (Ridhi N et
al;2013).
Oral health has made remarkable progress in most developed countries, as a result of
the rapid advances in the field of preventive dentistry. However, the situation is beginning to
deteriorate in many developing countries, wherethe oral diseases are on the increase and the
treatment access and awareness is still under developed (Sogi GM et al; 2002).
2.10. The impact of dental caries on quality of life.
Despite a low mortality rate associated with dental diseases,they have a
considerable impact on self-esteem, eatingability, nutrition and health both in childhood and
olderage. Teeth are important in enabling consumption of avaried diet and in preparing the
food for digestion. Inmodern society, the most important role of teeth is toenhance
appearance; facial appearance is very important indetermining an individual’s integration into
society. Teeth also play an important role in speech and communication. The second
International Collaborative Study of Oral Health Systems (ICSII), revealed that in all
countries covered by the survey substantial numbers of children and adults reported impaired
20
social functioning due to oral disease, such as avoiding laughing or smiling due to poor
perceived appearance of teeth (Chen M et al; 1997). Throughout the world, children
frequently reported apprehension about meeting others because of the appearance of their
teeth or that others made jokes about their teeth. In addition, dental diseases cause
considerable pain and anxiety (Kelly M et al 2000). Dental decay also results in tooth loss,
which reducesthe ability to eat a varied diet. It is, in particular, associatedwith a diet low in
fruits, vegetables and non-starch polysaccharides (NSP), and with a low plasma vitamin C
level. Tooth loss may, therefore, impede the achievement of dietary goals related to the
consumption of fruits, vegetables and NSP. Tooth loss has also been associated with loss of
enjoyment of food and confidence to socialize (Steele JG et al; 1998). It is, therefore, clear
that dental diseases have a detrimental effect on quality of life both in childhood and older
age.
21
3. MATERIAL AND METHODS.
3.1. Research design and sampling:
3.1.1. Study population.
The survey was conducted in the city of Chennai, India. A total of 200 children participated
in the survey between the age groups of 13 to 14 years. In each of these age groups an
attempt was made to include equal number of male and female subjects. Out of these 200
children, 100 were from the private school which is situated in the city and 100 were from the
public school which is located in the suburbs. The schools were selected based on the socio-
economic status. Children belonging to the low socio-economic groups were those studying
in the public school and the high socio-economic group comprised of children studying in
private school. The consent for examining of the children was obtained from the principal of
the two schools. The criteria for selection of the study subjects were that the children should
be permanent residents of Chennai and should be full time students enrolled in the school.
Depending on the conditions of the school, the exact arrangement for conducting the
examination was determined. The subjects were examined on an upright chair in adequate
natural light. A torch light was used to examine the oral cavity (mouth). Examination of the
child was done by only one examiner to avoid inter-examiner variability. Recording of data
was done by a two trained dental assistants who assisted throughout the study. Prior to the
examination for dental caries, a questionnaire was filled by the subject to find out the
personal data and oral hygiene habits. Tooth surface was dried and examination of the oral
cavity was made using a dental mouth mirror, and dental probe. Calibration procedures were
performed prior to and during the study to ensure that a consistent standard of the diagnosis
was maintained. Re-examinations were carried out on approximately one in ten children
selected at random to have a constant check on the inter examiner variability. The data was
recorded on a Performa and were entered into a computer.
22
3.2. Organizing the survey:
3.2.1. Obtaining ethical clearance and permission from the concerned authorities.
The ethical clearance for the present study was obtained from the Lithuanian
university of health science, Kaunas Lithuania, The Dental council of India and the Principals
of the public and private schools. The required official permission for the study was obtained
from Health & Family Welfare Office of Chennai Tamilnadu and local medical officers of
Primary Health Centers and Sub-centers. For examination of children in the rural areas, co-
operation and oral consent was taken from school principle heads.
3.2.2. Scheduling.
The present study was conducted from June 2013 to August 2013. A detailed
monthly schedule of the survey was prepared well in advance and the concerned authorities
were informed regarding examination place, date and timings. On an average 20 subjects
were interviewed and examined on each day. Examination of each individual took
approximately 8-10minutes.
3.3 Implementing the survey:
3.3.1. Informed consent
Consent from each study subject was taken after explaining the nature of the study.
3.3.2. Data collection
The data was collected with the usage of proforma, which included
questions related to socio-demographic characteristics22, oral hygiene practices,
adverse oral habits, some other habits like brushing teeth, coca cola and sweet consumption,
frequency of dental visits and professional cleaning.
3.3.3. Armamentarium: The following instruments and supplies were used for the study.
1. Plane mouth mirrors
2. Explorers
3. Tweezers
4. Containers
5. Surgiscrub
6. disposable tumblers
23
7. Chemical disinfectants
8. Towels
9. Gauze
10. Gloves and Mouth Masks
11. Survey Proforma
Adequate number of sterilized instruments was made available during the survey and
current recommendations and standards were followed for infection control.
24
3.4. Implementing the survey:
Table 1: General distribution of the study population
Table 1. shows that 100 (50.0%) children from the public school and 100 (50.0%) from the
private school participated in the study, out of which, 112 (56.0%) boys and 88 (44.0%) were
girls. Out of the 200 children who took part in the study, 86 (43.0%) were from the poor
socio-economic group, 72 (36.0%) were from the average and 37 (18.5%) were fro the rich
socio-economic group.
The children’s nutrition, frequency of consumption of different products were recorded
in the diet pattern.
The cariosity and socio-economic determinants were recorded in self administered
questionnaires.
Diet pattern such as fruits, green vegetables, milk and cooked vegetables were
categorized into healthy foods. It was further subcategorized into healthy and non healthy,
under this healthy were children taking this food, every day, several times in a day and five to
six times a day; not healthy were those who were taking these foods once a week, less than
once a week and never.
Diet pattern such as sweets, cakes, pastries, cookies, coca cola, other soft drinks
containing sugars and energy drinks were categorized into not healthy foods. It was further
subcategorized into healthy and not healthy.
N %
Gender
Boys 112 56.0
Girls 88 44.0
School
Private 100 50.0
Public 100 50.0
25
For cariosity, DMFT (decayed, missing filled teeth) criteria was used. The DMFT
Index is applied to the permanent dentition and is expressed as the total number of teeth or
surfaces that are decayed (D), missing (M), or filled (F) teeth, in an individual. When the
index is applied to teeth specifically, it is called the DMFT index. Cariosty was categorized
into caviation and not cavitation groups..
Factors such as car, bedroom, holiday, family, father’s and mother’s job was included
in socio-economic determinants and were recorded. This criteria was categorized into three
groups, low income as poor, average and rich.
3.5 Statistical analysis:
The data collected was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows,
version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Descriptive statistics (mean, proportion, standard
deviation) were used to describe the characteristics of the sample. The Chi-square test was
used to explore the association between dental caries and diet pattern and socio-economic
status .The statistical significance was considered as P ≤ 0.05. Simple and Multiple logistic
regression analysis was used to find the degree of association between diet, dental caries and
socio-economic status. 95% confidence interval and odds ratio was calculated.
26
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1. Characteristics of diet pattern among school children
4.1.1. Diet pattern among the gender
The diet pattern among boys and girls was categorized as healthy and not healthy.
Fruits, green vegetables, cooked vegetables, and milk and yogurt were recorded as variables
under healthy foods and sweets and candies, cakes and pastries, coca-cola and energy drinks
were recorded as variables under unhealthy foods.
Table 2: The distribution of diet pattern among boys and girls
Variable
Boys
N=112
Girls
N=88
P
value
> 4 days <= 4 days Total > 4 days <= 4 days Total
Healthy
foods
N (%) N (%) N (%) N(%) N(%) N(%)
Fruits 52(61.9) 60(52.6) 112(56.6) 32(38.1) 54(47.4) 86(43.4) 0.24
Green
vegetables
48(49.5) 64
(63.4)
112(56.6) 49(50.5) 37(36.6) 86(43.4) 0.06
Cooked
vegetables
71(53.4) 41 (63.1) 112(56.6) 62 (46.6) 24 (36.9) 86(43.6) 0.224
Milk and
yogurt
65 (61.9) 47 (50.5) 112(56.6) 40 (38.1) 46 (49.5) 86(43.6) 0.116
27
Not
healthy
foods
Sweets,
candies
71(53.0) 42(63.6) 113(56.5) 63(47.0) 24(36.4) 87(43.5) 0.17
Cakes,
pastries
107(56.9) 6 (50.0) 113(56.5) 81(43.1) 6(50.0) 87(43.5) 0.76
Coca-cola 98 (54.4) 15 (75.0) 113(56.5) 82 (45.6) 5 (25.0) 87(43.5) 0.98
Energy
drink
104 (55.9) 9 (64.3) 113(56.5) 82 (44.1) 5 (35.7) 87(43.5) 0.59
According to Table 2, it was found that boys ate more healthy food such as fruits,
green vegetables, cooked vegetables, milk and yogurt (61.9%, 49.5%, 53.4%, 61.9%
respectively) when compared with girls (38.1%, 50.5%, 46.6%, 38.1% respectively), however
the difference was not statistically significant.
Consumption of unhealthy foods such as sweets and candies , cakes, coca cola, Energy drink
was more among the boys (53. 0,56.9, 54.4, 55.9) than girls (47.0,43.1,45.6,44.1), however
the difference was not statistically significant.
28
Figure 1: Consumption of healthy and unhealthy diet among gender
According to Figure 1, it was found that boys consume both healthy and unhealthy
foods more than girls.
Some studies have categorized fruits and vegetables under ‘Healthy’ dietary pattern
and pudding and snacks consisting mainly of high fat and/or high sugars under ‘Unhealthy’
dietary pattern (Leone CA Craig et al, 2008). A similar dietary pattern was also followed in
our study, except for that we included milk and yogurt, additional to fruits and vegetables
under healthy dietary pattern and sweets, cakes, colas and energy drinks under unhealthy
dietary pattern. Few studies have examined the effects of fast-food consumption on nutrition
or health-related outcome. Consumption of unhealthy foods like fast foods was more frequent
among males (Shanthy A Bowman et al, 2004) and its consumption seemed to have an
adverse effect on the dietary quality that may increase the risk for certain diseases.
Reason for higher consumption of unhealthy food among boys when compared to
girls seems to be unknown, but it may be due to the sample size as in this study the
participants among boys were more than that of girls.
Nutrition habits of the majority children did not meet the recommendations for the
healthy nutrition. It was established that children aged 13-14 years do not eat fresh fruits and
vegetables, cooked vegetables, milk and yogurt frequently enough. On another hand, excess
consumption of unhealthy food, sweets, cakes pastries, coca cola, Energy drinks and sweet
soft drinks was established by our study.
61,9
49,5 53,4
61,9
53 54,4 55,9 56,9
38,1
50,5 46,6
38,1
47 45,6 44,1 43,1
Eat fruits Green vegetables
Cooked vegetables
Milk and yogurt
sweets coca cola Energy drinks
Cakes
Boys >4 days Girls >4days
29
4.1.2. Diet pattern among socioeconomic status
The consumption of healthy and unhealthy diet pattern was recorded among the poor,
average and rich socio-economic status category and tabulated.
Table 3: Distribution of diet pattern among socio-economic status
Socio-economic
status
DIET PATTERN
Fruits, vegetables, milk –
healthy foods
Sweets, candies, colas – not healthy
foods
<= 4 day
N (%)
>4 days
N (%)
P value
<= 4 day
N (%)
>4 days
N (%)
P value
Poor 47(54.7) 39(45.3)
0.601
84(97.7) 2(2.3)
<0.001
Average 45(62.5) 27(37.5) 64(88.9) 8(11.1)
Rich 21(56.8)
16(43.2) 27(73.0) 10(27.0)
According to Table 3, out of the 200 children examined in the both public and private
school, it was found that children under the poor socio-economic group consumed more of
healthy food (45.3%) followed by children under the rich socio-economic group (43.2%)
and children under the average socio-economic group (37.5%). But the difference is not
statistically significant. However, the difference was not statistically significant. On the other
hand, children under the rich socio-economic status group consumed more of not healthy
foods (27.0%) followed by an average (11.1%) and poor (2.3%) socio-economic group. The
difference was statistically significant.
30
Fig 2.The characteristics of diet pattern among socio-economic status
According to Fig.2, children from the poor socio-economic status consumed more healthy
food followed by the rich and average socio-economic group.
Some studies have found a significant relationship between dietary patterns and socio-
economic indicators where consumption of ‘healthier’ dietary pattern were associated with
children from the lower income group and consumption of ‘unhealthy’ dietary patterns was
more among the higher income and higher education group (Leone C. A. Craig, 2010). In
another study it was found that children of lower socioeconomic status had less diverse diets
but ate less snack foods than children of higher socioeconomic status (Wendy S and Cathy C,
1993). Our study showed similar results.
The reason for more frequent consumption of unhealthy diet such sweets, cakes, colas and
others among children from the rich socio-economic status group may be due to its easy
availability they being able to afford it when compared to children from the poor socio-
economic group.
45,3
2,3
54,7
97,7
37,5
11,1
62,5
88,9
43,5
27
56,8
73
Healthy>4 days unhealthy >4 days Healthy<=4 days unhealthy <=4 days
poor Average Rich
31
4.1.3: Diet pattern among schools:
The distribution of the frequency of consumption of healthy and unhealthy foods
among children in the public and private school was recorded and tabulated.
Table 4: Distribution of diet pattern among school type
Private Public Total P value
N (%) N (%)
Healthy
food
<=4days 58(50.0) 58(50.0) 116(100) 0.88
>4 days 40(48.8) 42(51.2) 82(100)
Unhealthy
food
<=4
days
79(44.1) 100(55.9) 179(100) 0.00
>4 days 21(100.0) 0(0) 21(100)
According to the Table 4, the frequency of consumption of healthy food such as fruits,
green vegetables, cooked vegetables, milk and yogurt was consumed more among children
from the public school (51.2%) when compared with private schools (48.8%), however the p
value was not statically significant.
Unhealthy food such as sweets, cakes, coca cola, energy drinks was consumed more
among the private schools (100%) when compared with public school (0%). The results were
statistically significant.
The frequency of healthy food consumption less than 4 days was equal among the
public and private school (50.0% vs 50.0%). Whereas the unhealthy food frequency was
more among the public school when compared to private school (55.9% vs 44.1%.). However
the difference was not statistically significant.
32
Fig3 .The association of diet pattern with schools
Some studies have shown that children from private schools, who are generally of
higher socioeconomic status than those from public schools, tended to consume more
unhealthy foods than public school children (Florentino RF et al, 2002).
On the contrary, some studies have shown better eating patterns, such as higher fruit and
vegetable consumption and limited consumption of unhealthy foods, among private
schoolchildren (Filipe Ferreira da Costa and Maria Alice Altenburg de Assis, 2012).
Reason for unhealthy food consumption was more among the private school
children because easy of availability and a unhealthy food such as coca cola, energy drink,
cakes and pastries and sweets and they can afford to eat this. The children belonging to the
lower socio economic status group, receive a healthy vegetarian diet from the public school,
they cannot afford to eat unhealthy or junk foods and also there is less awareness and
availability of junk foods in the sub urban and rural areas. This is more prevalence in urban
area than rural area.
48,8
100
50 44,1
51,2
0
50 55,9
Healthy food >4 days
Unhealthy food >4 days
Healthy food <=4 days
Unhealthy food <=4 days
private public
33
4.2.Prevalence of Dental Caries among children
The prevalence of dental caries was recorded as cavitation and non-cavitation and was
analyzed among the socio-economic status, gender and school.
Table 5: Prevalence of Dental Caries among school type children and gender, social
economic status
Non cavitation Cavitation Total P value
No. % No. %
Socio-
economic
status
Poor 36 41.9 50 58.1 86
0.147 Average 40 55.6 32 44.4 72
Rich 21 56.8 16 43.2 37
Gender Boys 52 46.0 61 54.0 113 0.164
Girls 47 54.0 46 46.0 88
School Private 52 52.0 48 48.0 100 0.286
Public 47 47.0 53 53.0 100
According to Table 5, it was found that the prevalence of dental caries is more among
children in the public school (53.0%) when compared to the private school (48.0%). However
the difference was not statistically significant. Between boys and girls in public and
Private school, the prevalence of dental caries among boys (54.0%) is more when compared
to girls (48.0%). But the difference was not statistically significant. Children from the poor
socio-economic status group were more prone to dental caries (58.1%) followed by children
from the average (44.4) and rich socio-economic group (43.2). However, the difference was
not was statically significant.
Hence it clearly shows that the prevalence of dental caries was more among boys than
girls, more in the public school than the private school and more among the poor socio-
economic status.
34
Fig 4. The prevalence of dental caries among the gender, schools,
Fig 5. The prevalence of dental caries with social economic status.
46
54
52
47
54
48 48
53
Boys Girls Private Public
Non Cavitation Cavitation
41,9
55,6 56,8 58,1
44,4 43,2
Poor Average Rich
Non caviation Cavitaion
35
In a study done by Sudha P et al (2005), they found that the prevalence of caries
was greater in the low socio-economic group when compared to the high socio-economic
group . These findings are in accordance with the observations of Singh et al. (2006).
Chandra and Chawl, on the contrary observed higher caries prevalence in children belonging
to the high socio-economic status. Having filled teeth was highly associated to urban
location, having a literate mother, and having an advantaged socio-economic position while
untreated decay was associated mainly to semi-urban location. These findings may indicate
differences in access to health services and different levels of education on oral health.
Significant variation in total caries was however only observed across socio-economic
groups. Such differences may be related to the financial capacity of buying large amounts of
sweets and snacks among the socio-economic advantaged groups (Nanna J et al, 2009).
The grouping of subjects according to the socio-economic status encompasses
the influence of income, education, and social environment. Determination of social class is
complicated, especially in developing countries like India, where there are no specifically
accepted criteria for the same. In spite of the clear correlation between social status and
caries, in the assessment of caries risk, the reported sensitivities and specificities have been
low (Sudha P et al,2005).
Reason for the high dental caries among the poor lower social economic class
and among the public schools when compared to the high socio-economic group and private
schools because awareness, easy accessibility for dentist and affordability towards the dental
treatment and also having a literate mother, and having an advantaged socio-economic
position while untreated decay was associated mainly to semi-urban location. These findings
may indicate differences in access to health services and different levels of education on oral
health.
36
4.3. Diet pattern and dental caries
Dental caries was recorded as cavitation and non-cavitation and its association
with healthy and unhealthy foods was recorded and tabulated.
Table 6: The association of Dental Caries with Diet pattern
Diet pattern
Cariosity
P value Non cavitation cavitation
Healthy foods
Fruits,
vegetables and
milk
<=4 days 55 (56.1) 61 (61.0) 0.486
>4 days 43 (43.9) 39 (39.0)
Not healthy
foods -
Sweets,
candies and
cola ,energy
drink
<=4 days 90(50.3) 89(49.7) 0.340
>4 days 9(42.9) 12(57.1)
Table 6, shows that children who consumed healthy foods less frequently are more
prone to dental caries (61.0%), when compared to children who consumed healthy foods
more frequently (43.9%). However the difference is not statistically significant.
Children, who consumed unhealthy foods more frequently, show more prevalence of
dental caries (49.7%), when compared to children who consumed healthy foods less
frequently (42.9%). However the difference is not statistically significant.
37
Fig 6. The association of diet pattern with dental caries
In this cross-sectional study we have analyzed the relationship between dental caries and
the consumption of healthy and not healthy dietary pattern. Whereas most of the studies have
investigated the relationship between total sugars intake which is considered as not healthy in
our study and caries development. Gustafsson et al (1954) found a significant relationship
between caries development and intake of sugars for both the primary and permanent
dentition. In a comprehensive study of dental caries increment and diet of over 400 English
adolescents (aged 11–12 years) a small but significant relationship was found between intake
of total sugars and caries increment over 2 years. The results of this study were almost similar
to the present study but the difference was not statistically significant.
Reason for high consumption of unhealthy food was due to easy availability, affordility
in the city than the suburbs easy availability of healthy diet in the rural areas when compared
to the city where there is less awareness and access to unhealthy food and junk foods.
43,9 42,9
56,1
50,3
39
57,1 61
49,7
Healthy >4 days unhealthy>4 days Healthy<=4 days unhealthy food<=4days
Non cavitation cavitation
38
Table 7: Binary Logistic regression
`` crude model 1 Adjusted Model 2
Socio economic status Odd ratio(95%CI) Odds ratio(95%CI)
poor Ref Ref
Average 0.57(0.30-1.08) 4.11(1.20-14.08)
Rich 0.54(0.25-1.19) 1.58(0.63-3.92)
Diet pattern
1Coca cola >4 days Ref Ref
Coca cola<=4 days 0.65(0.25-1.67)
Cakes>4 days Ref
1.34(0.34-5.35) Cakes<=4days 1.54(0.43-5.50)
Sweets>days Ref
0.51(0.26-0.88) Sweets<=4days 0.63(0.34-1.18)
Energy>4 days
2.09(0.93-4.68) Energy<=4days 1.57(0.16-2.86)
Gender
Boys Ref Ref
Girls 0.60(0.41-1.27) 0.40(0.76-2.59)
Schools
Private Ref Ref
Public 1.22(0.70-2.12) 0.62(0.24-1.57)
39
The relative risks (odds ratios) for cariosity adjusted for confounding is estimated for
categories such as socio-economic status, gender, type of school and diet pattern.
The evaluation of socio-economic status revealed insignificant differences among the
subgroups in low, average and rich categories, of school children respectively reported for
dental caries (df=1, P=0.147). However, the poor socio-economic group reported for a higher
prevalence of dental caries when compared to the average and rich group. The odd risk of
dental caries is calculated for the average and rich socio-economic group, keeping the poor
socio-economic group as the reference category. The elevation in risk is two times less
among both average and rich group with values 1:0.65 and later is 1:0.54
The evaluation of unhealthy diet pattern with dental caries of school children respectively
However the coca cola, Sweet, Energy drinks, cakes >4 days as reference reported for dental
caries. The odd risk of dental caries is calculated .The elevation for risk is more .
The evaluation of odd risk for private school has reference group the odd risk ratio for the
public school is 1.22(0.70-2.12).The elevation is 2 times more.
The evaluation of odd risk for gender boys has the reference groups the odd risk ratio for the
girls 0.60(0.41-1.27).odd risk ratio is 2 times lesser.
In general, results of our study shows that school health survey is an excellent means to
screen large number of children with minimum resources. The present study provides
information on diet pattern, social economic status, and dental caries among adolescents. The
study was not conducted on large scale for the entire state and therefore the results are not
generalized to the whole state and country. The information on oral health was collected by
means of interview and being a school based study, a response rate was obtained. Among the
total children (200) completely filled the and returned the
questionnaire. The present study provides the charters tic of diet pattern among gender,
social economic status and schools the association between dental caries among the gender,
schools and social economic status and finally between the association between diet pattern
and dental caries 75% of them respondents.
The present study shows that dental caries was more among poor social economic status
compared to rich social economic status. But not statically significant because sample size is
40
quite small but this study shows the tendency of unhealthy food such cakes, sweets, coca cola
and energy drinks towards the dental caries.
Reason for more dental caries among poor social economic status inspite of having more
healthier diet when compared to rich social economic status may be due to having filled teeth
was highly associated to urban location, having a literate mother, and having an advantaged
socio-economic position while untreated decay was associated mainly to semi-urban location.
These findings may indicate differences in access to health services and different levels of
education on oral health. This study is important in public health point view because to create
awareness, affordability of dental treatment and also to provide the regular periodic dental
checkups among poor social economic status in public schools. This study is a pointer to the
fact that there still exist a large segment of the population who continue to remain ignorant
about the detrimental effects of poor oral health and the multiple benefits enjoyed from good
oral health.
Systematic approach to the control of this disease is needed. Due to scarcity of public
resources for oral health care and keeping in mind the current incidence of dental caries, a
national oral health policy that emphasizes prevention rather than curative care is more
advantageous. The implementation of community-based oral health promotion progra me’s is
a matter of urgency. In relation to children, such programme’s could be initiated through
health promoting school projects. The identification of significant caries risk factors specific
to children living in Chennai city may be quite useful in developing these preventive
programmes.
Limitations of the study. My research had limitation this study was primarily limited by its
small sample size. The sample size could have been more .Ideally the number of participant
would have been more evenly distributed across gender and year in school etc. A larger and
more detailed study with equal sample size in each group could help in getting an insight into
the relationship between diet and dental caries .It is possible that real differences in caries
experience may exist between diet pattern, but even if they do, they are masked by and are of
secondary importance to the social and cultural factors in the environment.
Determination of social class is complicated, especially in developing countries like India,
where there are no specifically accepted criteria for the same. In spite of the clear correlation
between social status and caries, in the assessment of caries risk, the reported sensitivities and
specificities have been low.
41
CONCLUSIONS
1) The diet pattern of Indian school going children aged between 13 to 14 years was not
healthy among the boys and girls. Children under the poor socio-economic category
consumed more healthy diet followed by the rich and average socio-economic group
and consumption of unhealthy diet was more among the rich socio-economic group
followed by average and poor socio-economic group. Children in the public school
consumed healthy food more than children from the private school.
2) The prevalence of dental caries and its relation with various risk factors was estimated
among 13- 14year-old school children of Chennai city. Prevalence dental caries was
more among the boys when compared to girl’s .The children belonging to the low
socio-economic status had higher caries prevalence than those belonging to the high
socio-economic status. Caries prevalence was more among the public school children
when compared to private school.
3) Caries prevalence was lower among healthy diet patterns. A correlation was seen
between unhealthy diet consumption and caries, with the prevalence of dental caries
increasing with increasing exposure to unhealthy food. The unhealthy food
consumption was found to have a highly significant relation with the socio-economic
status.
42
PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS
1 Monitoring. The unhealthy diet pattern such has coca cola , sweets, cakes, pastries,
Energy drinks major problem of dental caries in the developing countries like India among
school going children. Despite of larger emphasis on tooth brushing and awareness in the
schools .The schools should also pay increasing attention towards diet pattern among both
private and public .The monitoring is in routine bade every month is very important.
2 Health education. The lessons of health education should be implemented into teaching
curriculum starting from kindergarten and primary schools and higher secondary schools. It is
important to provide for children the appropriate nutrition knowledge and skills.
3 School. The role of school health service should be increased. They should
concentrate more on oral health promotion programs on nutrition .The school can incorporate
oral health promotion as an integral part of schools curricula.
4 Oral health. Oral health professional can plan, propose and implement school oral health
promotion activities as part of building up oral health promoting school.
5 Family and family health services. Parents need more health education on the matters
related with nutrition, dental problem. Family dentist also should take integrated efforts with
school health services to educate and instruct parent’s on health promotion matters of their
children.
43
LIST OF REFERENCES
1. Arens U. Oral Health, Diet and Other Factors: Report of the British Nutrition
foundation Task Force. 1998
2. Brighton Tasara Mafuvadze, Lovemore Mahachi, Benford Mafuvadze. Dental caries
and oral health practice among 12 year old school children from low socio-economic
status background in Zimbabwe; Pan African Medical Journal 2013; 14: 164.
3. Burt B, Eklund S, Morgan K. The effects of sugars intake and frequency of ingestion
on dental caries increment in a three-year longitudinal study; Journal of Dental
Research; 1988; 67(11):1422-1429.
4. Cappelli DP, Mobley CC. Prevention in Clinical Oral Health Care. Philadelphia, Pa:
Mosby Elsevier; 2007
5. Chen M, Andersen RM, Barmes DE, Leclercq MH, Lyttle SC. Comparing Oral
Health Systems. A Second International Collaborative Study. Geneva: World Health
Organization, 1997
6. Cyril.O.Enwonwo. Review of oral disease in Africa and the influence- of socio-
economic factors. International Dental Journal;1981(31):29-38
7. Donahue GJ, Waddell N, Plough AL, Del Aguila MA, Garland TE. The ABCD’s of
treating the most prevalent childhood disease. American Journal of Public
Health. 2005 August; 95(8): 1322–1324.
8. Dennison BA: Fruit juice consumption by infants and children: a review, Journal of
American College of Nutrition 1996, 15(5):26-29
9. Edward Lo; The DMF index; taken from a published lecture on; Caries Process and
Prevention Strategies: Epidemiology.
10. Gustafsson B, Quensel C, Lanke L. The Vipeholm dental caries study: The effect of
different levels of carbohydrate intake on caries activity in 436 individuals observed
for five years. Acta Odontologica Scandanivaca. 1954;11(3-4):232-264.
44
11. Harris R. Biology of the children of Hopewood House, Bowral, Australia. 4.
Observations on dental caries experience extending over five years (1957-61) ;
Journal of Dental Research; 1963 Nov-Dec;42:1387-1399
12. Joyson Moses, Rangeeth BN, Deepa Gurunathan. Prevalence of dental caries,
socio-economic status and treatment needs among 5to15 year old school
children of Chidambaram; Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2011,
5(1):146-151
13. Jurgensen N and Petersen PE. Oral health and the impact of sociobehavioural factors
in a cross sectional survey of 12-year old school children in Laos. BMC Oral Health
2009, 9:29.
14. Kelly M, Steele J, Nuttall N, Bradlock G, Morris J, Nunn J. Adult Dental Health
Survey. Oral Health in the United Kingdom 1998. London: The Stationery Office,
2000.
15. Kolker J, Yuan Y, Burt B, et al. Dental caries and dietary patterns in low-income
African American children. Pediatric Dental Journal. 2007;29(6): 457-464.
16. Lonim Prasai Dixit, Ajay Shakya, Manash Shrestha and Ayush Shrestha. Dental
caries prevalence, oral health knowledge and practice among indigenous Chepang
school children of Nepal; BMC Oral Health 2013; 13:20
17. Marshall T, Levy S, Broffitt B, et al. Dental caries and beverage consumption in
young children. Pediatric Dental Journal; 2003;112(3):184- 191.
18. Maria Cristina Rigatto Witt; Pattern of Caries experience in a 12- year-old Brazillian
population related to socio-economic background. Acta Odontologica Scandanivaca.
1992; February; 50 (1): 25-30
19. Manzar AK, Dilabaz K, Zia Ur Rahman K. Dental ailments between low and high
socio-economic status school children; Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal 2011, 31(2):
388-391.
20. Marthaler TM. Epidemiological and clinical dental findings in relation to intake of
carbohydrates; Caries Research; 1967; 1(3): 222-238.
21. M.L. Mattila, P. Rautava, M. Sillanpaa and P. Paunio. Caries in Five-year-old
Children
and associations with Family-related Factors; Journal of Dental Research; 2000;
79 (3): 875-881
45
22. Moynihan PJ, Snow S, Jepson NJA, Butler TJ. Intake of non-starch polysaccharide
(dietary fibre) in edentulous and dentate persons: an observational study. British
Dental Journal 1994; 177: 243–7.
23. Munjal V, Gupta A, Kaur P, Garewal R. Dental caries prevalence and treatment needs
in 12 and 15-year-old school children of Ludhiana city. Indian Journal of Oral
Sciences 2013; 4:27-30.
24. Nanna Jurgensen and Poul Erik Petersen. Oral health and the impact of socio-
behavioural factors in a cross sectional survey of 12-year old school children in Laos;
BMC Oral Health 2009; 9:29.
25. Norman Tinanoff, Carol A Palmer. Dietary determinants of Dental Caries and Dietary
Recommendations for Pre School Children; Journal of Public Health Dentistry; 2000;
60 (3): 197-206
26. Palmer C, Kent R, Loo C, et al. Diet and caries-associated bacteria in severe early
childhood caries. Journal of Dental Research. 2010;89(11):1224- 1229.
27. Paula Moynihan. The interrelation between diet and oral health; Proceedings of the
Nutrition Society 2005; 64; 571–580.
28. Prabu S, Joseph Jonh. Dental caries prevalence among 12 year old school children
from urban and rural areas in Tamil Nadu, India – A comparative study; e-Journal of
Dentistry 2013; 3(1).
29. Pratiti Datta and Pratyay Pratim Datta. Prevalence of dental caries among school
children in Sub-urban India; Epidemiology, an open access journal 2013; 3(4).
30. Rai B, Jain R, Duhan J, Anand S. Relationship Between Dental Caries And Oral
Hygiene Status Of 8 To 12 Year Old School Children. The Internet Journal of
Epidemiology 2006;4(1).
31. Ridhi Narang, Litik Mittal, Kunal Jha, Anamika, Roseka. Caries Experience and Its
Relationship with Parent’s Education, Occupation and Socio Economic Status of the
family among 3-6 Years Old Preschool Children of Sri Ganganagar City, India; Open
Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine 2013; 1(1): 1-4.
32. Rugg-Gunn AJ. Diet and dental caries. In: Murray JJ. Prevention of Oral Disease.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996: 3-31
46
33. Schachetele CF. Dental caries: prevention and control. A textbook of preventive
dentistry. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1980
34. Steele JG, Sheiham A, Marcenes W, Walls AWG. National Diet and Nutrition
Survey: People Aged 65 Years and Over. Volume 2: Report of the Oral Health
Survey. London: The Stationery Office, 1998.
35. Singh S, Kaur G, Kapila VK. Dental disorders in primary school children of Faridkot
City. Journal of Indian Dental Association 1985;57:305-8
36. Sogi GM, Bhaskar DJ. Dental caries and oral hygiene status of school children in
Davangere related to their socio-economic levels: An epidemiological study; Journal
of Indian Society of Pedodontic and Preventive Dentistry 2002; 20 (4):152-157.
37. Sohn W, Burt B, Sowers M. Carbonated soft drinks and dental caries in the primary
dentition. Journal of Dental Research. 2006; 85(3):262-266.
38. Sudha.P, Bhasin.S, Anegundi R.T. Prevalence of dental caries among 5 to 13 year old
children of Mangalore city; Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontic and Preventive
Dentistry 2005; 22: 2.
39. Thomas S, Tandon S, Nair S. Effect of dental health education on the oral health
status of a rural child population by involving target groups. Journal of Indian Society
of Pedodontic and Preventive Dentistry 2000; September;18(3):115-125.
40. Weiss RL and Trithart AH. Between-meal eating habits and dental caries experience
in preschool children. American Journal of Public Health; 1960;50:1097
41. Whitney Evans, Catherine Hayes, Carole A. Palmer, Odilia I. Bermudez, Steven A.
Cohen, Aviva Must. Dietary Intake and Severe Early Childhood Caries in Low-
Income, Young Children; Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; 2013;
113: 1057-1061.
42. World Health Organization, 1997. Oral Health Surveys, Basic Methods. 4th edition.
47
QUESTIONNARIES
CHILDREN'S ORAL HEALTH AND RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE
INVESTIGATION
FORM TO BE FILLED BY STUDENTS
Dear students,
Thank you for participating in this study. In response to this questionnaire, it will help us learn more about
children's oral health. This will allow dentists and researchers to explore, deeper children's teeth and other oral
diseases organ to disclose their reasons for selecting the best treatment. This will be useful as healthy teeth are
very important for good health and your happiness.
How to fill in the questionnaire?
Carefully read each question. In response to it, the box, which is near or below the most likes you the answer.
For each question tick only one box, otherwise we will not be able to count your answers. If it is difficult to
choose a single answer, so think, at that moment which answer is accurate. In other cases, write a response to
the points marked.
Please reply to the questions yourselves. After filling the form, insert it in an envelope, stick and give it yourself
to the school visiting doctors. We promise that no one at school and parents (guardians) will know your
answers.
Thank you in advance for honesty and sincerity.
The study by the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
The study coordinator
Shilpa.G.Mirajkar
48
1) Today's date: Day..... Month..................... Year 201…..
Questions about yourself
2) When were you born?
I was born on: Day..... Month..................... Year ….................
3) Who are you: a boy or a girl?
4) Which class do you study in?
In brackets, write the letter and class, for example, 7 (A) class, if any.
I am studying in ........................... (..........) classroom
5) Where do you live?
Questions about General health and happiness
6) How would you describe your health?
49
7) In general, how you feel thinking about your current life?
happy
8) The picture drawn ladder: At the top of the ladder is score 10 – if you are most satisfied with your life,
at the bottom is 0 – if you are least satisfied with your life.
Where on the ladder do you feel you standing now?
Mark the box that best reflects your position.
10 Most satisfied
with life
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 least
satisfied with life
Oral health status and complaints
9) How would you describe your oral health?
Mark one box for each row
50
very good well average poor very bad
a) Dental
b) Lip
c) Gum
d) Stomatitis
e) Jaws and joints
10) During the past three months as part of a mouth organ Thee plagued health disorders?
Mark one box for each row
Just not a
trouble
A little
distressed
somewhat
distressed weary
It is very
tiring
a) Dental
b) Lip
c) Gum
d) Stomatitis
e) Jaw and joints
51
11) In the last three months of the dry felt an organ pain?
Mark one box for each row
never
once or
twice sometimes often
almost
every day
a) Dental
b) Lip
c) Gum
d) Stomatitis
e) Jaw and joints
12) During the past three months has your mouth had such problems?
Mark one box for each row
Never
once or
twice Sometimes often
almost
every day
a) When cleaning your
teeth, do your gums
bleed
b) Sores or wounds on
the lips
c) Mouth sores or
wounds
d) Bad breath from
mouth
e) Does food get caught
between your teeth
f) Are your teeth
sensitive to hot, cold
or sweets
52
13) During the past 3 months due to dental or oral condition, do you ...?
Mark one box for each row
Never
Once or
twice Sometimes Often
Almost
every day
a) Tear and chew solid
food like apple and
meat
b) Take longer time
than others to chew
the food
c) Could not drink or
eat anything hot or
cold
d) Could not drink
through a straw
e) Could not be opened
wide
14) During the past 3 months due to dental or oral condition you ...? Mark one box for each row
If this was not associated with dental or oral condition, note the answer "Never"
Never
Once or
twice Sometimes Often
Alm ost
every day
a) Breathing through
the mouth
b) Could not form
words
c) Blogs slept
d) headaches
e) In general, you feel
ill (nausea, felt
fatigue, etc.).
53
Questions about your feelings and emotions
15) During the past 3 months due to dental or oral condition
You are ...? Mark one box for each row
If this was not associated with dental or oral condition, note the answer "Never"
Never
Once or
twice sometimes often
Almost
everydy
a) Cries, suddenly
excited
b) Lack of courage,
self-confidence
c) You were
embarrassed, felt
ashamed
d) Were you nervous,
irritable, angry
e) you feel lonely
f) Do you feel,others
are thinking badly
about your teeth or
mouth
g) Do you feel,your
teeth or mouth does
not look as nice as
the other
h) Do you feel, your
teeth or mouth are
not as healthy as
other
i) Did you feel
dejected because of
their teeth or mouth
j) Do you feel,you
stand out from the
rest thanks to their
teeth or mouth
appearance
54
Questions about school, friends and leisure time
16) During the past 3 months due to dental or oral condition
You are ...? Mark one box for each row
If this is not related to the teeth or mouth, note the answer "Never
Never
Once or
twice Sometimes Often
Almost
every day
a) Avoiding school
b) Could not
concentrate at school
c) Could not concentrate
with homework
d) Avoid loud talking in
class or read
e) Avoid attending
sports, choir or other
circles, get-togethers
or school trips
f) Avoid talking with
your friends
g) Avoid eating when
other people were
around
h) Avoid smile or laugh
when you are around
other children were
i) In general, avoid
being with other
children
j) It was hard to play
wind musical
instruments (if you
play)
55
17) During the past 3 months due to dental or oral condition ...?
Mark one box for each row
If this is not related to the teeth or mouth, note the answer "Never"
Never
Once or
twice sometimes often
Once or
twice
a) Other kids made fun of
You
b) Other children avoid
you
c) Other children asked
what happened to your
teeth or mouth
How do you take care of their teeth and mouth
Remember the last 3 months
18) How often do you brushing your teeth with a toothbrush and toothpaste?
19) Have you noticed that brushing your teeth with a toothbrush and toothpaste, it is difficult to clean your
teeth? (eg dental remains of food)
20) What kind of toothbrush you use?
1
56
special
21) What kind of toothpaste you use?
22) Do you rinse your mouth with mouthwashes?
1 Never
2 Sometimes
23) Do you use sanitary thread (floss) between the teeth to clean?
1 Never
2 Sometimes
ften
24) Do you use toothpicks to clean between the teeth?
1 Never
2 Sometimes
ften
Treatment / Healing
25) Do you have a filled tooth?
1 Yes
No
57
26) Do you have rotten teeth that need to be treated?
ng was noticed by the doctor
27) Over the last 12 months, you visited the dentist?
28) If "Yes", visited the why? Mark all that apply. If "No", skip this question.
sore tooth
29) How much do you fear dental treatment?
30) Have you ever noticed that your teeth are irregularly placed, or did you notice a bad bite?
e doctor said
58
31) Do you wear / wore dentures?
How long have wearing ............................................. ....
32) Do you wear / wore braces?
t worn
33) If you wear / wore dentures or braces, how much do you think this treatment has helped you (improved
health, appearance or other)?
plate or braces
do not know because recently wearing
Diet and smoking
Remember the last 3 months
34) How often do good or eat these foods?
Mark one box for each line.
Never
Less than
once a week Weekly
2-4 days a week
5-6 days a week
Every day,
once a day
Every day, several
times a day
a) fruit
59
b) green vegetables
c) cooked vegetables
d) Candies, chocolate
e) Cakes, brownies, cookies
f) Coca-Cola and other carbonated soft drinks
g) various energy drinks
h) Milk, yogurt, cottage cheese, cheese and other dairy product
35) Have you ever smoked (at least one cigarette)?
1 Yes
36) How often do you smoke?
60
Questions about your parents and family
37) How often do you talk to parents about your dental and oral health?
Mark one box for each row
Veryeasy Easy It is
difficult
It is very
difficult
Do not
have or
see this
person
a) The father
b) The stepfather (sponsor)
c) with mom
d) The stepmother (Patron)
38) Overall, how easy is it to talk to your parents, about the different things that are important to you and made
you worried about?
Mark one box for each row
Very easy Easy It is
difficult
Very
difficult
Do not
have or
see this
person
a) The father
b) The stepfather
(sponsor)
c) with mom
d) The stepmother
(Patron)
39) Does your family have a computer?
61
40) Does your family have a car?
1 .No
41)How many times in the past 12 months you together with your family, went on trips (vacation)?
1. Never
42) Do you have your own room?
1. yes
2. no
43) How well off do you think your family is?
1
2
3
4
5 not at all well off
44) Does your father have a job?
44). Does your mother have a job?
2 No
62
Questions about your abilities
45) The table shows the wide variety of claims about your abilities. After reading each statement, note how
many agree with him or disagree
Mark one box for each line.
Strongly
agree Agree Disagree
Strongly
disagree
a) I feel that I am inferior to other
b) It seems to me that I have more
good qualities
c) Overall, I think that I am a loser
d) I am able to everything as well
as many other
e) I feel that I have little to be
proud of
f) About myself I feel good
g) Overall, I am a self-satisfied
h) I prefer a more self-respect
i) Sometimes, I feel to be useless
to anyone
j) Sometimes I think that I am
nothing?
63
CHILDREN’S ORAL HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE
RECORD FORM FOR
ORAL HEALTH EXAMINATION
SCHOOL ...................................... CLASS.............
ID ..................................................................
1. Today‘s date: ________ / _________ / 201____
DAY MONTH YEAR
2. Date of birth: ________ / _________ / _______
DAY MONTH YEAR
3. Gender
1 Boy
2 Girl
1.1.1.1.1.1 4
.
1.1.1.1.1.2 Ask the child if the following questionnaires
were completed:
1.1.1.1.1.3 1.1.1.1.1.4 A. For child himself 1.1.1.1.1.5 1.1.1.1.1.6 B. For parents (guardians)
1 Yes 1 Yes
2 No 2 No
64
To
p /
Lef
t
Bo
tto
m /
Lef
t
7 –
sea
l
8 –
sea
l +
act
ive
dec
ay
9 –
sea
l +
sta
bil
ized
dec
ay
10
– e
xtr
act
ed t
oo
th d
ecay
on
11
– e
xtr
act
ed t
oo
th fo
r o
rth
od
on
tic
pu
rpo
ses
12
– r
eta
ined
to
oth
13
– s
eala
nts
2
8
38
27
37
26
36
25
35
24
34
23
33
22
32
21
31
11
41
0 –
wh
ole
su
rfa
ce i
s h
ealt
h
1 –
in
tact
su
rfa
ce a
ctiv
e d
ecay
(sm
ear)
2 –
act
ive
dec
ay
, th
e su
rfa
ce e
na
mel
def
ect
3 –
act
ive
dec
ay
, d
eep
en
am
el d
enti
ne
def
ect
4 –
in
tact
su
rfa
ce s
tab
iliz
ed d
eca
y (
smea
r)
5 –
sta
bil
ized
dec
ay
, th
e su
rfa
ce e
na
mel
def
ect
6 –
sta
bil
ized
dec
ay
, d
eep
en
am
el d
enti
ne
def
ect
12
42
13
43
14
44
15
45
16
46
17
47
18
48
M
O
D
B
L
۞
M
O
D
B
L
۞
To
p /
Rig
ht
Bo
tto
m /
Rig
ht
65
A1. Oral Hygienic Index (by Silness & Loe) 4 points assessment
0
No plaque
1 The small amount of plaque at cervical region
2 Plaque is clearly visible at cervical region and interdental space
3 Thick deposits of plaque on the surface of the tooth to the gum and interdental spaces which are clearly visible and run through probe
A2. Assessment of periodontal status (CPITN index)
0 – Healthy
1 – Bleeding on probing
2 – Stones
3 – A pocket of 4-5 mm
4 – 6 mm pockets and deeper
5 – Missing sextant
A3. Dental fluorosis classification (by Thylstrup & Fejerskov)
The upper jaw The lower
jaw
Central incisors
Lateral incisors
Canines
First premolars
Second premolars
First molars
Second molars
A4. Discoloration or damaged tooth
Discoloration
Hipoplasia
Tetracycline
Erosion
Attrition
66
B. Tooth position and occlusal evaluation
1.1.1.1.1.7 B
1
.
1.1.1.1.1.8 Lateral teeth ratio (Angle class):
Ratio of the first molars:
1.1.1.1.1.9 1.1.1.1.1.10 Right 1.1.1.1.1.11 1.1.1.1.1.12 Left
1 Angle I 1 Angle I
2 Angle II 2 Angle II
3 Angle III 3 Angle III
1.1.1.1.1.13 B
2
.
Ratio of the canines
1 Angle I 1 Angle I
2 Angle II 2 Angle II
3 Angle III 3 Angle III
B3. No teeth (solving of adentae, ectopic and retained teeth)
Mark observed disturbances
Classification Criteria
0 No changes
1 Retained tooth
(excluding third
molars)
5.i Did not spring up teeth due to crowding,
dislocation, overcomplement tooth, ankylosing
deciduous teeth, and other pathological reasons
2 Mild hipodontia 4.h Missing one tooth in any quadrant and required
orthodontic treatment prior to restorations or
gaps closing to avoid the prosthesis
3 Severe hipodontia 5.h Missing more than one tooth in any quadrant
and required orthodontic treatment prior to
restorations
4 Partially appearance
of teeth 4.t Partially appearance of teeth, leaning and
blocked the adjacent tooth
5 Overcomplement
tooth
4.x Extra teeth
67
B3. No teeth (solving of adentae, ectopic and retained teeth)
Mark observed disturbances
6 Milk tooth
ankylosis
5.s
B4. Horizontal mouth overlay (HMO): ........................... mm
Classification Criteria
1 A small positive,
competent lips
2.a 3.5 mm <HMO ≤ 6 mm, lip competent
2 A small positive
incompetent lips 3.a 3.5 mm <HMO ≤ 6 mm, lip incompetence
3 Medium positive 4.a 6 mm <HMO ≤ 9 mm
4 Bright positive 5.a HMO > 9 mm
5 Slightly negative 2.b -1 mm ≤ HMO < 0 mm
6 Average negative free
speech and chewing
problems
3.b -3.5 mm ≤ HMO < -1 mm, no speech and
chewing problems
7 Bright negative free
speech and chewing
problems
4.b HMO < -3.5 mm, no speech and chewing
problems
8 On average, the
negative, with a speech
and chewing problems
4.m -3.5 mm ≤ HMO < -1 mm, is a speech and
chewing problems
9 Bright negative, with
speech and chewing
problems
5.m HMO < -3.5 mm, is a speech and chewing
problems
B5. Lips
0 Competent
1 Incompetent
B6. Chewing disorders
0 No
68
B6. Chewing disorders
1 Yes
B7. Speech disorders
0 No
1 Yes
B8. Cross-bite (CB)
0 No
1 Yes
B9. CB: .......................................... mm
Measured distance (CB) between the retruded contact urface and the
intermound surface.
B10. CB location B11. CB functional disorders
1 Front
0 No
2 Right side
1 Yes
3 Left side
4 Single tooth
69
B12. Classification Criteria
0 No changes
1 A small front or side 2.c CB ≤ 1 mm
2 Average front or side 3.c 1 mm < CB ≤ 2 mm
3 Bright front or side 4.c CB > 2 mm
4 Lateral lingual 4.l One-sided or double-sided lateral lingual CB
without functional occlusal contacts
B13. Displacement of the contact points (DCP): ........................... mm
(crowding). Measured distance between the two most crowded permanent teeth
Classification Criteria
0 No changes
1 Small 1.- DCP ≤ 1 mm
2 Noticeable 2.d 1 mm < DCP ≤ 2 mm
3 Quite a bit 3.d 2 mm < DCP ≤ 4 mm
4 Bright 4.d DCP > 4 mm (pronounced shift in the
point of contact)
70
B14. Vertical moth overlay (VMO): ............................. mm
Classification Criteria
0 No changes
1 Increased OB, deep
bite
2.f VMO ≥ 3.5 mm no contact with the gums
2 Increased OB, deep
bite 3.f Deep bite, reaching the gums or palate, no
injuries
3 Increased OB, deep
bite 4.f Deep bite, reaching the gums or palate with
trauma
4 Front or side open
bite
2.e 1 mm < VMO ≤ 2 mm
5 Front or side open
bite
3.e 2 mm < VMO ≤ 4 mm
6 Front or side open
bite
4.e VKP > 4 mm
B15. Lip or cleft palate and other anomalies
1 No
2 Yes (5.p)
B16. Pre-normal or post-normal occlusion without other abnormalities
1 No
2 Yes (2.g)
B17. Photo
1 Was made
2 Was not made
B18. Aesthetic component (1.....10)
71
B18. Aesthetic component (1.....10)
.....................................................................
Dental component of the ICON index
3 A. Open incisors bite B. Incisors overlay
0 Edge to edge
0 <1/3
1 < 1 mm 1 From 1/3 to 2/3
2 From 1.1 to 2 mm
2 From 2/3 to the full
3 From 2.1 to 4 mm
3 Full
4 > 4 mm
4 The upper and lower posterior teeth ratio from front to back (in arrow direction):
Right Left
0
The upper lateral teeth in contact with the protuberance of
lower teeth:
Angle I, II, III
0
1 Any tuberosity ratio but not in thalamus to the thalamus 1
2 Thalamus to the thalamus 2
1 A. Crowding B. Spaces between the teeth
0 < 2 mm 0 < 2 mm
1 From 2.1 to 5 mm
1 From 2.1 to 5 mm
2 From 5.1 to 9 mm
2 From 5.1 to 9 mm
3 From 9.1 to 13 mm 3 > 9 mm
4 From 13.1 to 17 mm
5 > 17 mm
5 Retained teeth
72
PHOTOGRAPH.
Material used for data collection.
Dental examination carried out in public school
73
Dental examination carried out in private school