The Privatization Story

91
Connecting The Dots - Privatization is the Symptom, Not the Cure June 23, 2012 Tom Tresser

description

Tom Tresser presented at a forum of privatization and the Chicago Infrastructure Trust at SEIU's Chicago HQ on Saturday, June 23, 2012. Visit http://www.civiclab.us. Contact Tom = [email protected]

Transcript of The Privatization Story

Page 1: The Privatization Story

Connecting The Dots -Privatization is the

Symptom, Not the Cure

Connecting The Dots -Privatization is the

Symptom, Not the Cure

June 23, 2012Tom Tresser

June 23, 2012Tom Tresser

Page 3: The Privatization Story

Store front space for activists & educators to collaborate, research, teach, build tools/apps that will help

accelerate CIVIC ENGAGEMENT &

COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT efforts.

Page 4: The Privatization Story
Page 6: The Privatization Story
Page 7: The Privatization Story
Page 8: The Privatization Story

“You’re next! You’re next!”

Page 9: The Privatization Story

Bad dealsbleed city.

Page 10: The Privatization Story
Page 11: The Privatization Story
Page 12: The Privatization Story
Page 13: The Privatization Story

5% or 40%?

Page 14: The Privatization Story
Page 15: The Privatization Story
Page 16: The Privatization Story
Page 17: The Privatization Story
Page 18: The Privatization Story
Page 19: The Privatization Story

Richard Norment,

Executive Director, The

National Council for

Public-Private Partnerships

Page 20: The Privatization Story
Page 21: The Privatization Story

Watch this 2 ½ minute video @ http://tinyurl.com/InfrastructureTrustExplained

Page 22: The Privatization Story

June 18, 2012

“Until the case is made that this trust is

necessary and will operate on the behalf of

the public, the entire

enterprise should be scrapped.”

Page 23: The Privatization Story

Richard Norment,

Executive Director, The

National Council for

Public-Private Partnerships

“You’re next!”

“You’re next!”

Page 24: The Privatization Story

The Frame for PrivatizationThe Frame for Privatization

He who frames the argument wins the argument…

Page 25: The Privatization Story

The Frame for PrivatizationThe Frame for Privatization

1.We are broke.

2.Government is stupid. Private sector is genius.

Page 26: The Privatization Story

The Frame for PrivatizationThe Frame for Privatization

Therefore…

If you (Ms. Citizen) want anything new or improved from

government, we need to turn to the private

sector.

Page 27: The Privatization Story

OOPS!

Maybe private

sector is NOT the

best steward of the public

good.

Page 28: The Privatization Story
Page 29: The Privatization Story

“The average private government contractor with a security clearance earns about $20,000 more each year than a government employee with the same clearance.”

Page 30: The Privatization Story

So what’s the REAL reason...?So what’s the REAL reason...?

Paul Krugman, Winner Nobel Prize in Economics, 2008

From his column in the New York Times, June 21, 2012….

Paul Krugman, Winner Nobel Prize in Economics, 2008

From his column in the New York Times, June 21, 2012….

Page 31: The Privatization Story

“But the main answer, surely, is to follow the money. Never mind what privatization does or doesn’t do to state budgets; think instead of what it does for both the campaign coffers and the personal finances of politicians and their friends. As more and more government functions get privatized, states become pay-to-play paradises, in which both political contributions and contracts for friends and relatives become a quid pro quo for getting government business. Are the corporations capturing the politicians, or the politicians capturing the corporations? Does it matter?…The point, then, is that you shouldn’t imagine that what The Times discovered about prison privatization in New Jersey is an isolated instance of bad behavior. It is, instead, almost surely a glimpse of a pervasive and growing reality, of a corrupt nexus of privatization and patronage that is undermining government across much of our nation.”

Page 32: The Privatization Story

We are not broke!

Page 33: The Privatization Story

Watch the first 6 minutes of this video @ http://tinyurl.com/NewYork-Is-Not-Broke

Page 34: The Privatization Story

New York State faces a budget deficit of$10 billion in 2011 ~ 1/13th of

a total $132 billion operating budget

Page 35: The Privatization Story

Public employees are blamed (for a crisis we did not create)Threatened with 9,800 layoffs

WHAT’S HAPPENING?WHAT’S HAPPENING?

WHAT’S HAPPENING?

Page 36: The Privatization Story

A major assault A major assault upon upon

public education, education, public health health

and and public safety safety

A major assault A major assault upon upon

public education, education, public health health

and and public safety safety

Page 37: The Privatization Story

An offensive An offensive against public workers, public workers,

led by the nation’s led by the nation’s Governors Governors

and lawmakers, and lawmakers, state by statestate by state

An offensive An offensive against public workers, public workers,

led by the nation’s led by the nation’s Governors Governors

and lawmakers, and lawmakers, state by statestate by state

Page 38: The Privatization Story
Page 39: The Privatization Story

ANTI-UNION LEGISLATION INTRODUCED IN OVER 20 STATES

RIGHT-TO-WORK LAWS INTRODUCED IN 14 STATES

WISCONSIN AND OHIO HAVE PASSED SWEEPING ANTI-UNION LAWS

TEACHERS’ UNIONS TARGETED… States with bills to limit or eliminate collective bargaining for teachers, or otherwise target teachers' unions include Wisconsin, Ohio, Tennessee, Indiana, Nebraska, Texas, New Hampshire, Michigan, Idaho, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Alabama, Florida, Minnesota, Missouri, Utah, Arizona, and others

Page 40: The Privatization Story

Public employeePublic employeeunion membersunion members7.6 million.7.6 million.

Private sector Private sector union members union members 7.1 million.7.1 million.Source: Source:

““(Government) workers of the (Government) workers of the world unite! Public-sector world unite! Public-sector unions have had a good few unions have had a good few decades. Has their luck run decades. Has their luck run out?” out?”

The EconomistThe Economist, 1/6/11, 1/6/11

www.economist.com/node/17849199www.economist.com/node/17849199

Page 41: The Privatization Story

A major assault A major assault upon organized labor,upon organized labor,an offensive against an offensive against

all of the unionsall of the unions

A major assault A major assault upon organized labor,upon organized labor,an offensive against an offensive against

all of the unionsall of the unions

Page 42: The Privatization Story

We need to take We need to take our own pulse! our own pulse!

Remember the Remember the adage: “the best adage: “the best defense is a defense is a good offense.”good offense.”

We should ask: We should ask: Who are they defending?

We need to take We need to take our own pulse! our own pulse!

Remember the Remember the adage: “the best adage: “the best defense is a defense is a good offense.”good offense.”

We should ask: We should ask: Who are they defending?

Page 43: The Privatization Story

BILLIONAIRES! BILLIONAIRES!

THE ASSAULT ON THE

UNIONS IS REALLY A

DEFENSE OF THE BANKERS

AND

BILLIONAIRES

THE ASSAULT ON THE

UNIONS IS REALLY A

DEFENSE OF THE BANKERS

AND

BILLIONAIRES

Page 44: The Privatization Story

In the universe there are 1,210 billionaires

In the universe there are 1,210 billionaires

Page 45: The Privatization Story

412 Billionaires in the USA! 412 Billionaires in the USA!

Page 46: The Privatization Story

How many Billionaires in

New York?

68!

Page 47: The Privatization Story

New York

IS NOT BROKE!

68 Billionaires

in New York

Page 48: The Privatization Story

The wealthiest New Yorker is no longer Mayor Bloomberg…

(he’s now the 2nd wealthiest)…

The wealthiest New Yorker is no longer Mayor Bloomberg…

(he’s now the 2nd wealthiest)…

XX

Page 49: The Privatization Story

Today the richest New

Yorker isDavid Koch,

worth about $22

Billion!

Today the richest New

Yorker isDavid Koch,

worth about $22

Billion!

Page 50: The Privatization Story

During the heyday of America’s middle class (1950-1980) the top 1% had about

10% of total income.

They now take 25%!

During the heyday of America’s middle class (1950-1980) the top 1% had about

10% of total income.

They now take 25%!

Page 51: The Privatization Story

Top 1% Income Share 1914 to 2006Top 1% Income Share 1914 to 2006

^ ^ Eisenhower Reagan

Growing income inequality

James Parrott, Ph.D., Fiscal Policy Institute, “Grow Together or Pull Farther Apart? Income Concentration Trends in New York,”

http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/FPI_GrowTogetherOrPullFurtherApart_20101213.pdf

Page 52: The Privatization Story

We have the most unequal income concentration of any state in the

nation.

New York’s wealthiest 1% get more than

35% of all income in New

York State.

Page 53: The Privatization Story

Income shares and household incomes in New York 1980 compared with 2007

(2007 dollars)

Shares of Total Income (AGI) % change1980 -Top 5% - 22%2007 - Top 5% - 49%

1980 - Bottom 95% - 78%2007 - Bottom 95% - 51%

Income shares and household incomes in New York 1980 compared with 2007

(2007 dollars)

Shares of Total Income (AGI) % change1980 -Top 5% - 22%2007 - Top 5% - 49%

1980 - Bottom 95% - 78%2007 - Bottom 95% - 51%

James Parrott, Ph.D., Fiscal Policy Institute, “Grow Together or Pull Farther Apart? Income Concentration Trends in New York,”

http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/FPI_GrowTogetherOrPullFurtherApart_20101213.pdf

Page 54: The Privatization Story

Since 1990,the top 5% have

GAINED.

THE bottom 95% have LOST.

Since 1990,the top 5% have

GAINED.

THE bottom 95% have LOST.

Page 55: The Privatization Story

Income shares and household incomes in New York 1980 compared with 2007

(2007 dollars)

Average Income (AGI) % change1980 -Top 1% $446,507

2007 - Top 1% $2,730,973 +511.6%

1980 - Bottom 50% $16,0742007 - Bottom 50% $14,045 -12.6%

Income shares and household incomes in New York 1980 compared with 2007

(2007 dollars)

Average Income (AGI) % change1980 -Top 1% $446,507

2007 - Top 1% $2,730,973 +511.6%

1980 - Bottom 50% $16,0742007 - Bottom 50% $14,045 -12.6%

James Parrott, Ph.D., Fiscal Policy Institute, “Grow Together or Pull Farther Apart? Income Concentration Trends in New York,”

http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/FPI_GrowTogetherOrPullFurtherApart_20101213.pdf

Page 56: The Privatization Story

Top 0.01% Income Share 1913 to 2008Top 0.01% Income Share 1913 to 2008

“Striking it Richer:The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States”Emmanuel Saez, July 17, 2010http://www.econ.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2008

The eve of the Depression

Page 57: The Privatization Story

0.01% of householdsThat’s 1/10,000th! take more than 5%

of total income

This isUNSUSTAINABLE

0.01% of householdsThat’s 1/10,000th! take more than 5%

of total income

This isUNSUSTAINABLE

Page 58: The Privatization Story

The Wealthiest 1% (80,000 households) together pull in

over $200 billion annually, more than 1/3rd of all income in NY.

The state budget deficit is 5% of $200 billion ($10 billion).

Source: James Parrott, Ph.D., “Grow Together or Pull Farther Apart? Income Concentration Trends in New York,” Dec. 13, 2010, Fiscal Policy Institute

The Wealthiest 1% (80,000 households) together pull in

over $200 billion annually, more than 1/3rd of all income in NY.

The state budget deficit is 5% of $200 billion ($10 billion).

Source: James Parrott, Ph.D., “Grow Together or Pull Farther Apart? Income Concentration Trends in New York,” Dec. 13, 2010, Fiscal Policy Institute

Page 59: The Privatization Story

Reinstituting the 1972 NYSincome tax

structure would yield $8 billion more in income tax

revenue for New York,

while reducing income taxes for 95% of us!

http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/taxhistory2.htm

Page 60: The Privatization Story

Lost revenue: billions & billions & billionsNY’s tax-cutting binge from 1994-2000, has lead to the current fiscal crisis.NY’s tax-cutting binge from 1994-2000, has lead to the current fiscal crisis.

“Back on Track: Why Progressive Tax Reform is an Essential Part of New York’s Budget Solution,” March 2009, Fiscal Policy Institute

http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/CWFandFPI_BackOnTrackPersonalIncomeTaxReform_20090323.pdf

Page 61: The Privatization Story

Tax wealthnot work.

Page 62: The Privatization Story

TIFS =Giant Slush

Fund

Page 63: The Privatization Story

Where are TIFs?Where are TIFs?

All over Chicago and Cook County

• 161 in city of Chicago

• Additional 264 in suburban Cook County

• 2010 = 425 TIF districts in Cook County

Page 64: The Privatization Story

Where are TIFs?Where are TIFs?

Page 65: The Privatization Story

How Many TIFs?How Many TIFs?

Page 66: The Privatization Story

How Much Revenue Do TIFs Collect?

How Much Revenue Do TIFs Collect?

Cook County Clerk’s Office

Page 67: The Privatization Story

How Much Revenue Have Chicago TIFs

Collected?

How Much Revenue Have Chicago TIFs

Collected?

Ouch!

Page 68: The Privatization Story

2010 TOTAL TIF REVENUE FOR COOK COUNTY

City of Chicago

TIFs diverted $510 MILLION

Suburban Cook County

TIFs diverted $297 MILLION

TOTAL FOR 2010 = $807 MILLION

How Much Revenue Do TIFs Collect?

How Much Revenue Do TIFs Collect?

Page 69: The Privatization Story

Who Is Harmed By TIFs? Who Is Harmed By TIFs?

In Chicago, The Board of Education is SUPPOSED to get almost 54% of your property taxes. But…

Page 70: The Privatization Story

Who Is Harmed By TIFs? Who Is Harmed By TIFs?In Chicago, The Board of Education is SUPPOSED to get almost 54% of your property taxes. But…

This property owner is in the Touhy/Western TIF District and 24% of HIS property taxes were captured by the district. The Board of Education only got 39% of his property taxes. That’s a loss of 15% in revenues from this single taxpayer.

Page 71: The Privatization Story

Who Is Harmed By TIFs? Who Is Harmed By TIFs?

Page 72: The Privatization Story
Page 73: The Privatization Story

TIF for North Side auto dealer is a boondoggle. (Opinion)(city officials plans to give Grossinger Auto Group $8.5 million in tax-increment financing )

Crain's Chicago Business – Jan 14, 2008

TIF addiction in Chicago reached a new low last week.

City officials endorsed a plan to give Grossinger Auto Group $8.5 million in tax-increment financing to build a dealership at the bustling intersection of North and Clybourn avenues on the North Side. The site isn't in a TIF district, but the officials were kind enough to create one just for the building Grossinger plans to convert into a four-level auto mall.

Page 74: The Privatization Story

2009 revenues of

$2.6 BILLION!

Page 75: The Privatization Story

2009 revenues of

$2.6 BILLION!

IN 2009 THE CITY GAVE CHICAGO MERCHANTILE EXCHANGE

$15 MILLION TIF $ FOR REHABBING CORPORATE HQ.

APPROVED BY ALDERMAN BOB FIORETTI.

Page 76: The Privatization Story

New Mayor is “Shocked”!New Mayor is “Shocked”!

The Chicago Sun-Times (5/25/11) reported that "Without criticizing Daley directly, Emanuel said he was ‘shocked’ to learn that TIF districts have been multiplying for more than two decades without any job creation standards."

Page 77: The Privatization Story

THE CITY HAD $1.4 BILLION IN UNSPENT TIF FUNDS AT THE END OF 2008 AND NEARLY AS MUCH AT THE END OF 2009 AND 2010!

CAN YOU SAY “UNACCOUNTABLE

SLUSH FUND”?

Page 78: The Privatization Story

These TIF transfers of property taxes to wealthy and successful companies divert public funds from vital units of government. They are yet more examples of the 99% being ripped off to enrich the 1%.

Page 79: The Privatization Story

The Problem Is State-WideThe Problem Is State-Wide

In Illinois, 360 municipalities have 943 TIF Districts

In 2010, across the state, 414 TIF districts were in “non-compliance” for not filing any or proper financial statements, according to The Office of the State Comptroller. That’s 44% of all Illinois TIFs!

?

Page 80: The Privatization Story

Stopgiving away

our stuff!

Page 81: The Privatization Story

The Fedsare wasting our money

Page 82: The Privatization Story
Page 83: The Privatization Story
Page 84: The Privatization Story
Page 85: The Privatization Story

Illinois net loss of $253 billion from

1991 – 2001

Page 86: The Privatization Story
Page 87: The Privatization Story

ILLINOIS NET FEDERAL TAX

LOSS

$ 4 BILLION/YEAR.

Page 88: The Privatization Story

Stopwars now.

Demilitarize USA.

Page 89: The Privatization Story

To Sum UpTo Sum Up

• We are NOT broke

• Tax wealth, not work

• Don’t give away our stuff

• Stop the wars

• Start planning for 2015!

• Take back our stuff. Protect & extend the public. Cut class size in half. We take care of our own!

• We are NOT broke

• Tax wealth, not work

• Don’t give away our stuff

• Stop the wars

• Start planning for 2015!

• Take back our stuff. Protect & extend the public. Cut class size in half. We take care of our own!

Page 90: The Privatization Story
Page 91: The Privatization Story

[email protected]

@tomstee@civiclabchicago

312-804-3230

www.civiclab.us