The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

download The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

of 25

Transcript of The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    1/25

    The predominance of infrared emission from

    the polar region of accreting supermassive

    black holes

    Daniel AsmusESO, Chile

    with

    Sebastian Hnig & Poshak Gandhi

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    2/25

    AGN are bright(est) in the mid-infrared.

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    3/25

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    4/25

    Type 2AGN

    Type 1

    AGN

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    5/25

    Type 2AGN

    Type 1

    AGN

    ???

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    6/25

    WISE (0.4m)

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    7/25

    WISE (0.4m)

    4

    VLT/VISIR (8.2m)

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    8/25

    Asmus et al. 2014

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    9/25

    Only few without strong star formation are resolved (~10-100pc)Is the resolved emission coming from the torus?

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    10/25

    Establishing a system axis from ionisation cones [OIII],radio jets, maser disks, and polarized emission.

    NGC 2110;credit: D. Evans

    Circinus;Greenhill et al. 2003

    Circinus;

    Wilson et. al. 2000

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    11/25

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    12/25

    The resolved emission is coming from the polar axis of theAGN systems!

    Asmus et al. 2016 (see also Braatz et al. 1993; Cameron et al. 1993; Bock et al. 2000;

    Radomski et al. 2002, 2003; Whysong & Antonucci 2004; Packham et al. 2005;

    Reunanen, Prieto & Siebenmorgen 2010; Hnig et al. 2010)

    Angular difference (System Axis - MIR extension)

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    13/25

    Is the mid-infrared emission of AGN dominated by dustin/along the ionisation cone instead of the obscuring torus?

    Relative amount of resolved emission

    Asmus et al. 2016

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    14/25

    The resolved emission strongly correlates with the [OIV]emission produced in the ionisation cone

    Relativeamountofre

    solvedemission

    [OIV] emissionAsmus et al. 2016

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    15/25

    Circinus;

    T

    ristrame

    tal.201

    4

    NGC1068;

    Lp

    ezGonzagaetal.2

    014

    N

    GC3783;Hnige

    tal.2013

    N

    GC424;Hnige

    tal.2012

    Polar elongation is dominant also on parsec scaleas found with MIDI interferometry (Lopez-Gonzaga et al. 2016)

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    16/25

    The small and large scale elongation are aligned and seem totrace the edge of the ionisation cone.

    Circinus; Tristram+14

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    17/25

    A new paradigm for the AGN dust structure?

    Hnig et al. 2012

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    18/25

    39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46log Lint(2-10keV) [erg/s]

    39

    40

    41

    42

    43

    44

    45

    46

    logLnuc(12m

    )[erg/s]

    The mid-infraredX-ray correlation for all types of AGN is drivenby dust in the ionisation cones rather than the torus

    Absorption-corr. X-ray luminosity

    ObservedMIR

    luminosity

    Asmus et al. 2015

    (see also:Glass et al. 1982;

    Krabbe et al. 2001;Lutz et al. 2004;Horst et al. 2006;Ramos Almeida et al. 2007;Horst et al. 2008;Gandhi et al. 2009;Levenson et al. 2009;Fiore et al. 2009;Hardcastle et al. 2009;Hoenig et al. 2010;Asmus et al. 2011;Mullaney et al. 2011;Mason et al. 2012;

    Matsuta et al. 2012;Ichikawa et al. 2012;Sazonov et al. 2012;

    Mateos et al. 2015;Stern 2015)

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    19/25

    What have we learned?

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    20/25

    Back-up Slides

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    21/25

    The chop & nod technique makes the target observable.

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    22/25

    The resolved emission is not correlated to the host orientation.

    Asmus et al. 2016

    Angular difference (System Axis - MIR extension)

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    23/25

    The outliers

    Seyfert 1.2

    [OIII] pointlike

    marginally

    resolved

    PA error 27

    Seyfert 1.5/2

    wide opening

    ionisation cones

    edge-on spiral

    emission traces

    host dust lane

    Seyfert 1.2

    wide opening

    ionisation cones

    weakest AGN in

    the sample

    low S/N

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    24/25

    The reasons for the low detection rates

    Distance unresolved

    low S/N intrinsic weakness

    Inclination no elongation

  • 7/25/2019 The predominance of infrared emission from the polar region of accreting supermassive black holes

    25/25

    Difference between type I and II is smaller than expected

    39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46log Lint(2-10keV) [erg/s]

    39

    40

    41

    42

    43

    44

    45

    46

    logLnuc(12m

    )[erg/s]

    Sy 1-1.5 (>=3 epochs)

    Sy 1.8-1.9 (>=3 epochs)

    Sy 2 (>=3 epochs)

    LINER (>=3 epochs)

    Sy 1-1.5 (