The Niche of Industrial Engineering

2
7/27/2019 The Niche of Industrial Engineering http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-niche-of-industrial-engineering 1/2 Member forum n  d  u  s  t  a n  g n  e  e •  J  u  y  0  0  3 26 with industrial engineering in name or practice. In a recent article in Industrial Engineer (“Redefining our Relevance,” May), Way Kuo, Ph.D., surmised that industrial engineering needed a niche. He suggested maintaining the core mission of industrial engineering with appropriate modern orientation. I completely agree with him; however, I believe that we already have a niche — industrial engineering. The core of the field must remain strong. The message must be clear and remain consistent. Kuo traces the origin of industrial engineering to the industrial revolution, and that is a proud heritage to have. Industrial engineering is a versatile pro- fession that probes into other areas just as other professions broaden into new challenges. The core message of our pro- fession should always be industrial engi- neering — not supply chain, not expert systems, not lean initiatives, not TQM, and not any other exploratory offshoot. Buzzwords come and go. If we remain consistent with our name and core mission, the profession will survive with a clear and recognizable identity. But if we dabble in fad-based names that have no historical roots, we will be swept around as the sentiments change. Many people are getting tired of the con- stant abnegation of the industrial engineer- ing name and profession. I don’t perceive any image problem: Maybe the problem is how we present and market the name. Changing the name of the profession will not solve the problem that some people believe exists. In more than two decades of proclaiming myself an IE nationally and internationally, no one has ever thrown eggs at me. So where is the bad image? In search of an identity that is not miss- ing, we often run under the cover of any new professional fad that comes along, to the detriment of our core competency. We need to adopt a consistent and positive outlook for what we do. Everything is already in our name. Our niche is already industrial engineering, and that is how we should continue to present ourselves.  True, we a re fre quen tly a sked, “Ind ustr ial engineering? What is that?” But such ques- tions arise because we have not been proac- tive in positively proclaiming the profession’s name. Industry, the root of the name, clearly explains what we are about. Any dictionary will reveal that industry generally means the ability to produce and deliver goods and services. This relates to how human effort is harnessed to carry out work. Isn’t that what industrial engineering is all about? To renounce the name of industrial engineering is to deny that the industrial revolution ever existed. Many institutions are beginning to merge industrial engineering departments into other departments. What do we expect? We are running the name of our profession into the mud to the extent that institutional administrators might think we cannot stand on our own professional feet.  The soo ne r w e e mba rk on a con sis te nt proclamation of our own identity, the sooner others will recognize our unique merit.  Th an ks to th e go od ba si c en gi ne er in g training I received, I can converse with my colleagues in other engineering disciplines about fluids flow, thermodynamics, circuits, chemical reactions, and so on. This is how you earn professional respect. Instead of capitalizing on our breadth of science train- ing, we often engage in denials that hurt our professional recognition. We are the problem with our image, not the name. My little boy once asked me, “Why is everything made in China?” He asked this because almost everything he owned carried the label “Made in China.” He asso- ciated China with a place where everything was made. Maybe we should start labeling everything we do “Done by an Industrial Engineer” so future generations will associ- ate our profession with industry, thereby eliminating the need to explain or justify the industrial engineering name.  Tho se who enj oy the deb ate can pic k i t up from here. I will spend the rest of my time earning more recognition for industrial engi- neering by interacting with colleagues from other disciplines. That is what it takes to establish a good image for any profession.  Aded eji B . Bad iru, Ph.D., P.E., is a pro- fessor and the head of the department of industrial engineering at the University of  Tennesse e in K noxv ill e, Tenn. B adir u, an IIE fellow, has been a member since 1977 and serves on the IIE Board of Trustees as senior vice president-at-large (international).  Voice your opin ion  To su bmi t an op in io n fo r th is co lu mn , e-mail the text to Managing Editor Monica Elliott at [email protected]. Member Forum columns must be 800 to 900 words in length. All submissions are subject to editing. Include a brief paragraph about yourself that includes your IIE membership status. We are the problem with our image. Nothing is wrong  The niche of industrial engineering By Adedeji B. Badiru

Transcript of The Niche of Industrial Engineering

Page 1: The Niche of Industrial Engineering

7/27/2019 The Niche of Industrial Engineering

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-niche-of-industrial-engineering 1/2

Member forum

I  n d  u s  t  r i   a l  E n gi  n e  e r • 

 J  u

l   y 2  0  0  3 

26

with industrial engineering in name or

practice.

In a recent article in Industrial Engineer 

(“Redefining our Relevance,” May), Way Kuo,

Ph.D., surmised that industrial engineering

needed a niche. He suggested maintaining

the core mission of industrial engineering

with appropriate modern orientation.

I completely agree with him; however, I

believe that we already have a niche —

industrial engineering. The core of the field

must remain strong. The message must be

clear and remain consistent. Kuo traces the

origin of industrial engineering to the

industrial revolution, and that is a proud

heritage to have.

Industrial engineering is a versatile pro-

fession that probes into other areas just

as other professions broaden into new

challenges. The core message of our pro-

fession should always be industrial engi-

neering — not supply chain, not expert

systems, not lean initiatives, not TQM,

and not any other exploratory offshoot.

Buzzwords come and go. If we remainconsistent with our name and core mission,

the profession will survive with a clear and

recognizable identity. But if we dabble in

fad-based names that have no historical

roots, we will be swept around as the

sentiments change.

Many people are getting tired of the con-stant abnegation of the industrial engineer-

ing name and profession. I don’t perceive

any image problem: Maybe the problem is

how we present and market the name.

Changing the name of the profession will

not solve the problem that some people

believe exists. In more than two decades

of proclaiming myself an IE nationally and

internationally, no one has ever thrown eggs

at me. So where is the bad image?

In search of an identity that is not miss-

ing, we often run under the cover of anynew professional fad that comes along,

to the detriment of our core competency.

We need to adopt a consistent and positive

outlook for what we do. Everything is already

in our name. Our niche is already industrial

engineering, and that is how we should

continue to present ourselves.

 True, we are frequently asked, “Industr ial

engineering? What is that?” But such ques-

tions arise because we have not been proac-

tive in positively proclaiming the profession’s

name.

Industry, the root of the name, clearly

explains what we are about. Any dictionary

will reveal that industry generally means

the ability to produce and deliver goods

and services. This relates to how human

effort is harnessed to carry out work. Isn’tthat what industrial engineering is all

about? To renounce the name of industrial

engineering is to deny that the industrial

revolution ever existed.

Many institutions are beginning to merge

industrial engineering departments into

other departments. What do we expect? We

are running the name of our profession into

the mud to the extent that institutional

administrators might think we cannot stand

on our own professional feet.

 The sooner we embark on a consis tentproclamation of our own identity, the sooner

others will recognize our unique merit.

 Thanks to the good basic engineer ing

training I received, I can converse with my

colleagues in other engineering disciplines

about fluids flow, thermodynamics, circuits,

chemical reactions, and so on. This is how

you earn professional respect. Instead of 

capitalizing on our breadth of science train-

ing, we often engage in denials that hurt

our professional recognition. We are the

problem with our image, not the name.My little boy once asked me, “Why is

everything made in China?” He asked this

because almost everything he owned

carried the label “Made in China.” He asso-

ciated China with a place where everything

was made. Maybe we should start labeling

everything we do “Done by an Industrial

Engineer” so future generations will associ-

ate our profession with industry, thereby

eliminating the need to explain or justify the

industrial engineering name.

 Those who enjoy the debate can pick i t

up from here. I will spend the rest of my timeearning more recognition for industrial engi-

neering by interacting with colleagues from

other disciplines. That is what it takes to

establish a good image for any profession.

 Adedeji B. Badiru, Ph.D., P.E., is a pro-

fessor and the head of the department of 

industrial engineering at the University of 

 Tennessee in Knoxv ille, Tenn. Badiru, an IIE

fellow, has been a member since 1977 and

serves on the IIE Board of Trustees as senior

vice president-at-large (international).

 Voice your opinion

 To submi t an opin ion for th is co lumn,

e-mail the text to Managing Editor Monica

Elliott at [email protected]. Member Forum

columns must be 800 to 900 words in

length. All submissions are subject to

editing. Include a brief paragraph about

yourself that includes your IIE membershipstatus.

We are the problem

with our image.

Nothing is wrong

 The niche of industrial

engineeringBy Adedeji B. Badiru

Page 2: The Niche of Industrial Engineering

7/27/2019 The Niche of Industrial Engineering

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-niche-of-industrial-engineering 2/2