The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?
description
Transcript of The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?
![Page 1: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Nearest Giant Ellipticals:
Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?
A hypothesis or theory is clear, decisive, and positive, but it is believed by no one but the man who created it. Experimental findings, on the other hand, are messy, inexact things which are believed by everyone except the man who did that work.
Harlow Shapley
![Page 3: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
NGC 5128 (Centaurus group)
NGC 3377 (Leo group)
NGC 3379 (Leo group)
W.E.H.
SDSS
![Page 4: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
In these three galaxies ….
Old halo and bulge RGB stars are readily accessible with HST imaging
(V,I) photometry works well (high metallicity sensitivity and takes full advantage of the optical cameras)
Interpolate within RGB tracks (calibrated onto the Milky Way globular cluster grid)
Fast, efficient way to derive first-order Metallicity Distribution Function
![Page 5: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
NGC 5128
Unique chance to study a halo population in an E/S0 giant at close range
d = 3.8 Mpc from several standard candles:
TRGB, PNLF, SBF, Cepheids
Metallicity Age
![Page 6: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
“20 kpc field”
Allocated in Cycle 5, mid-1994
Exposures taken August 1997!
Harris, Harris, & Poole 1999, AJ 117, 855
Harris, Poole, & Harris 1998, AJ 116, 2866
Previous work:
![Page 7: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
More fields ….
7’ 8.0 kpc = 1.4 Reff
18’ 20 kpc = 3.7 Reff
27’ 30 kpc = 5.4 Reff
33’ 37 kpc = 6.7 Reff
deepest, with ACS
![Page 9: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Peng, Ford & Freeman 2002
More fields ….
7’ 8.0 kpc = 1.4 Reff
18’ 20 kpc = 3.7 Reff
27’ 30 kpc = 5.4 Reff
33’ 37 kpc = 6.7 Reff
Malin 1983
![Page 10: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Harris & Harris 2000, 2002
Metal-rich all the way out!
Rejkuba, Greggio, Harris, Harris & Peng 2005
![Page 11: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Mean age = 8.5 Gy
![Page 12: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
NGC 3377
MV = -19.9
38.5 ksec V, 22.3 ksec I
field center at 12 kpc
(1.5 5.2 Reff )
Leo Group ellipticals: d = 10.5 Mpc
NGC 3379
MV = -20.9
38.5 ksec V, 22.3 ksec I
field center at 33 kpc
(10.3 13.6 Reff )
Harris, Harris, Layden & Stetson 2007, AJ in press
Harris, Harris, Layden & Wehner 2007, submitted
![Page 13: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
NGC 3377
![Page 14: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
NGC 3377
Entirely old, simple formation history, intermediate metallicity
No trace of metallicity gradient!
![Page 15: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
NGC 3379
ACS
NICMOS fields
Gregg et al. (2004) – old and high-Z
Textbook standard giant elliptical! “A walking advertisement for the deVaucouleurs law” (Statler & Smecker-Hane 1999)
DeVaucouleurs & Capaccioli 1979 (“note close agreement with r1/4 law”)
![Page 16: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
NGC 3379
ACS
![Page 17: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
NGC 3379V filter cutoff
2-stage chemical evolution
Are we seeing the “true” metal-poor halo for Z < 0.2 ?
![Page 18: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Are we seeing the region of transition to the classic metal-poor halo?
-5.6
-2.4
![Page 19: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Are we seeing the region of transition to the classic metal-poor halo?
Why didn’t we see it in the others?
Are we looking at two distinct components ?? (bulge + halo)
NGC 3377 1.5 5.2 Reff
NGC 3379 10.3 13.6 Reff
NGC 5128 1.4 6.7 Reff
Should we expect to find the transition starting routinely around 12 Reff ?
Kalirai et al. 2006 &&
M31 halo Z-gradient Metal-poor past R > 10 Reff
![Page 20: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Kalirai et al. 2006 &&
Metal-poor past R > 10 Reff
Williams et al. 2007
Virgo ICM stars
![Page 21: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Increasing luminosity of host galaxy
NGC 5128 Cycle 15 – ACS target fields at R = 70, 110, 140 kpc
(13, 20, 25 Reff)
![Page 22: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
- Finding them in the first place is hard. Field is at intermediate latitude (b = 19o), thus field contamination by both foreground stars and faint background galaxies is very significant
- Low SN = 2 (1500 GC’s total), thus “signal” is low
- Nearby (D = 4 Mpc), thus GCS is very dilute against the field
- Observing runs are always plagued by bad weather, bad seeing, or instrument failure [this includes HST]
What about the globular cluster population? N5128 permits detailed comparison
VERY DIFFICULT TO WORK WITH:
![Page 23: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
~450 clusters now known, 340 with radial velocities
Woodley et al. 2007, AJ, in press: kinematics & dynamics
Radial velocity measurements
Hi-res imaging (HST, Gemini, VLT, Magellan)
G.Harris et al. 2004 CMT1 database
![Page 24: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
(C-T1)0 metallicity
Metallicity distribution function
![Page 25: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
SN = 0.85 +- 0.12 SN = 4.2 +- 0.6
Metallicity distribution function
5)(
)(
MRS
MPS
N
N
The new “specific frequency problem” !
![Page 26: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
SN = 0.85 +- 0.12 SN = 4.2 +- 0.6
Probably a common feature of gE galaxies.
Assuming the low-metallicity clusters formed in massive pregalactic dwarfs, did they form –
-preferentially early relative to the field stars, followed by truncation of star formation?
-at ~5 x higher efficiency?
Harris & Harris 2002
Beasley et al. 2002
Jordan et al. 2004
Rhode et al. 2005
Major star formation phase of the gE
![Page 27: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
courtesy Thomas Puzia
Age estimates from Lick indices: Beasley et al. 2007
Highest-metallicity GCs appear 6-8 Gy old. cf. Rejkuba && halo-star mean age of 8.5 Gy
But -- Great majority > 10 Gy
![Page 28: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Gemini GMOS study of inner GC population
Preliminary !!
Woodley, Harris, Harris, Geisler, Gomez, & Puzia 2007
![Page 29: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
N5128: GC kinematics
Woodley et al. 2007, astro-ph/0704.1189
Blue, MP Red, MR
![Page 30: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Woodley et al. 2007
GCS PNeNGC 5128 NGC 3379
Romanowsky et al. 2003 Bergond et al. 2006
![Page 31: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
M87: Cote et al. 2001
Dynamical connection of a giant central galaxy with its surroundings
NGC 5128: Woodley 2006, AJ 132, 2424
![Page 32: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
There appears to be good reason to think that the metal-rich globular clusters and the main population of stars in E galaxies formed together
and
We may now have reason to think that the metal-poor globular clusters and the (more elusive) metal-poor halo stars formed together as well (but in a different ratio).
But are these generalizations risky? Prospects for continuing the halo-star studies are great if we can get HST back with WFC3 (or ACS) … more extended coverage of N5128, 3379, plus Virgo, Fornax E’s and many others.
Stellar populations are what happen when galaxy populations run out !
![Page 33: The Nearest Giant Ellipticals: Rosetta Stones or Fool’s Gold?](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815454550346895dc26aed/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
All depends on keeping the eye steadily fixed on the facts of nature, and so receiving their images as they are. For God forbid that we should give out a dream of our own imagination for a pattern of the world.
Francis Bacon (1623)
There appears to be good reason to think that the metal-rich globular clusters and the main population of stars in E galaxies formed together
and
We may now have reason to think that the metal-poor globular clusters and the (more elusive) metal-poor halo stars formed together as well (but in a different ratio).