The move to T+3 Phase 3 - Johannesburg Stock …...5 T+3 Project Market Communication The aim of the...
Transcript of The move to T+3 Phase 3 - Johannesburg Stock …...5 T+3 Project Market Communication The aim of the...
The move to T+3 Phase 3
Brett Kotze & Tyrone Arendse
2
T+3 Project
Market Communication
Agenda
• Overview of the move to T+3
• Structure of the JSE’s T+3 project
• Detailed walkthrough of the Phase 3 scope
• Explaining the sub-phases in Phase 3
• Training & User Readiness
• Risks / Issues / Questions
3
T+3 Project
Market Communication
Agenda
• Overview of the move to T+3
• Structure of the JSE’s T+3 project
• Detailed walkthrough of the Phase 3 scope
• Explaining the sub-phases in Phase 3
• Training & User Readiness
• Risks / Issues / Questions
4
T+3 Project
Market Communication
The aim of the T+3 project
The primary aim of the T+3
project is to shorten the
settlement cycle for equities from
5 to 3 days
5
T+3 Project
Market Communication
5
The aim of the T+3 project
Prior to the crisis, many markets had already settled on T3 since 1995. The JSE’s settlement cycle is notably out of step with global precedent (including emerging markets)
CCPs / Exchanges Settlement Cycle
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) Israel, Kuwait Stock Exchange, Saudi Stock Exchange
T+0
Eurex – Eurex Clearing, HKEx – Hong Kong Stock Exchange, Bulgarian Stock Exchange, Ljubljana Stock Exchange (Slovenia)
T+2
LCH – LCH Clearnet, DTCC – The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, ASX – Australian Stock Exchange, TSX – Toronto Stock Exchange, BM&F Bovespa – Brazil Stock Exchange, Mexico, Oman Stock Market (MSM), Nasdaq
T+3 (moving to T+2)
JSE T+5
According to Thomas Murray, fail rates for most exchanges are between 2 and 8 percent
Source: Stock Exchange websites, Chevreux/Credit Agricole Markets Trading Guide 2012; Thomas Murray Sept 2006
6
T+3 Project
Market Communication
CONTEXT
Source: Extracted from Thomas Murray White Paper, October 2006; FSB license renewal letter Nov 2012
The move to T+3 has been on the cards for many years and is now mandated by South Africa’s Financial Services Board (FSB)
Thomas Murray findings in 2006:
South Africa should move to a T+3 settlement cycle even if it results in “some” failed trades. Global benchmarks would improve by moving to T+3 even if there are fails It is the only area where South Africa does not meet the FTSE requirements for an Advanced Emerging Market*
FSB mandate November 2012 license renewal letter:
‘ . . .concerns were raised by the Licensing Committee regarding the continued delay in the implementation of the T+3 settlement cycle for equities as well as the perceived lack of prioritising the shortening of the settlement cycle. We request that the JSE do whatever is necessary to ensure the successful completion of this project.’
Project Rationale
7
T+3 Project
Market Communication
CONTEXT
1. Exposure:
‘Client-side transactions between buy-side and brokers represent significant uncollateralised, unguaranteed exposure
The amount of this market risk depends on time and volatility and thus increases with longer settlement cycles’
2. Capital
CSDPs are starting to hold capital for exposures. Longer cycles mean more capital
3. Systemic Risk
Systemic risk increases when the magnitude of outstanding transactions increases (risk is based on number of outstanding transactions and the concentration)
Source: BCG (Oct 2012)
Why is a shorter settlement cycle relevant?
Project Rationale (cont.)
8
T+3 Project
Market Communication
CONTEXT
Source: BCG (Oct 2012)
• Align to global best practice – comply with the FSB mandate
• Harmonisation across international markets
• Increased liquidity – faster reinvestment of assets that are released from the settlement process quicker
• Margin will be called earlier in the cycle
• Reducing the number of outstanding unsettled trades will:
• reduce settlement exposure / credit risk
• reduce systemic risk
• improve efficiencies by causing participants to adapt and modify behaviours
The FSB has mandated the JSE to move to T3 settlement cycle – T3 is now a licensing requirement
What are the benefits of reducing the JSE’s settlement cycle?
Project Rationale (cont.)
9
CONTEXT
According to Omgeo (global standard for PTS efficiency):
“The world-wide shift towards shorter settlement cycles will increase the number of failed trades, unless post-trade operational practices are adapted to reduce the period between trade execution and settlement. The most important change required is that market participants should affirm trades on the day the trade is executed, enabling both timely and accurate settlement.”
Custodian banks and their clients cite inaccurate settlement and account instruction (SI) data as the most significant reason for failure, followed by the deliberate failure to settle by counterparties and mismatches between cash and securities cycles.
The shorter settlement cycle does introduce the potential for failed trades, as less time is available for the resolution of any operational issues that may occur
Source: Omgeo (May 2012)
Does a shorter settlement cycle mean more failed trades?
Project Impacts
10
T+3 Project
Market Communication
CONTEXT
Plans to reduce fails:
• Further automation from trade execution to settlement – this includes going to real-time trade confirmation on T – part of the Phase 2 release
• Further automation across the market for Corporate Actions
• Removal of inefficiencies with regards to share removals between global and local markets – this has been the cause of all of failed trades since the go-live of electronic settlement. This will be compounded when moving to T+3 as the local settlement cycle will mirror global markets
• Increase Securities Lending & Borrowing liquidity – make more shares available for lending & borrowing to ensure settlement
• Preparing the market for the move to T+3
Behavioural change and efficient operations are vital to the process
How will the JSE keep failed trades low?
Project Impacts (cont.)
11
T+3 Project
Market Communication
Agenda
• Overview of the move to T+3
• Structure of the JSE’s T+3 project
• Detailed walkthrough of the Phase 3 scope
• Explaining the sub-phases in Phase 3
• Training & User Readiness
• Risks / Issues / Questions
12
Phase 1 – Regulatory and Automation
Phase 2 – ECS go-live on T+5 Settlement Cycle
Phase 3 – Market on T3 settlement cycle
Phase Status
1 Implemented successfully - 22 July 2013
2 Implemented successfully – 20 October and 27 October 2014
3 Analysis in progress, commenced with development and iterative testing
May to July 2016 ready for go-live
Overview of the T+3 timeline Overall programme status
13
Functions per phase
Releases
Phase 1 (Regulatory and Automation) Phase 2 (ECS Go-live T+5)
• Split Brokers Prop and Controlled
• Client Pledge (electronic pledge to 3rd parties)
• SLB Automation to CSDP’s
• Corporate Actions Automation to CSDP’s
• ECS (First Phase – replacement of the equities clearing & settlement system)
• Deal Management
• Prime Broking
• Technology Roadmap Upgrade (ECS)
Phase 3 (ECS T+3 Implementation)
• ECS (Second Phase – functional migration to T+3)
• Change from T+5 to T+3 Settlement
• Fails Management Automation
14
T+3 Update Timeline review and overall progress update
Phase 3 Timeline
2015 2016 2014
SEP JUNE MAY APR MAR FEB JAN DEC NOV DEC NOV OCT OCT SEP AUG JUL JUN MAY APR MAR FEB JAN JUL
SIT Cycle 1 Internal
UAT Cycle 1
Regression Cycle
SYT (7 iterations)
ECS Development
SIT Cycle 2 Internal
Scheduled to
start beginning
September
SIT Cycle 3
External
SIT Cycle 4
External
SIT Cycle 5
External
Scheduled to
start end Oct
Strate ready for testing on
new code base
September
4 C
SD
P’s
re
ad
y fo
r in
teg
ratio
n
Au
g –
Se
pte
mb
er
3 C
SD
P’s
re
ad
y fo
r in
teg
ratio
n
en
d O
cto
be
r
1 C
SD
P r
ea
dy fo
r in
teg
ratio
n
Fe
bru
ary
UAT Cycle 2
User Training
Refresher Training
Ready for
go-live May –
July 2016
15
T+3 Project
Market Communication
Agenda
• Overview of the move to T+3
• Structure of the JSE’s T+3 project
• Detailed walkthrough of the Phase 3 scope
• Explaining the sub-phases in Phase 3
• Training & User Readiness
• Risks / Issues / Questions
16
Overview of the Phase 3 scope
Functions changing / impacted JSE CSDPs JSE Equity Members
Strate Clients
T+5 to T+3 settlement cycle (timeline changes) x x x x x
Scrip Lending and Borrowing / Money Lending and Borrowing
x x
Terminating transactions BDA (Control clients and Brokers Prop)
x x x x x
Terminating transactions CSDP's x x x x x
Failed Trade Management x x x x x
Margining (SFA's) x x
Rework SFA's for prime broking x x
These changes affect a number of systems within the JSE
17
Reducing the timeframe in which to conduct the existing processes and activities will result in quicker settlement.
T+3 settlement cycle – old view
18
T+3 settlement cycle – new view
19
On-market activities current versus future
Action Current Timings – T+5 Future Timings – T+3
Settlement Orders – non-controlled clients
T - Batch T - Real-time after allocations
Client Affirmation to CSDP/Rejection to broker
T+2 (12h00) T+1 (18h00)
Deemed Affirmation Client T+2 (12h00) T+1 (18h00)
Broker re-allocation T+2 (16h00) T+1 (18h00)
Client affirmation of re-allocation T+2 (16h00) T+1 (18h00)
Brokers nets T+2 (EOD) T+1 (EOD)
20
On-market activities current versus future (cont.)
Action Current Timings – T+5 Future Timings – T+3
Non-controlled client breach T+3 (12h00) T+2 (12h00)
Principal Assumption (reverse substitution)
T+4 (12h00) T+2 (16h00)
Margining T+3 (EOD) T+1 (EOD)
Broker borrowing on Principal Assumption
T+4 (12h00 to 14h00) T+2 (16h00 to 18h00)
Settlement Authority SLB T+4 (14h00 to 16h00) T+3 (08h00 to 10h00)
Failed Trade/Rolling Of Settlement T+4 (16h00 to 18h00) T+3 (10h00 to 12h00)
Settlement T+5 T+3
21
Off-markets activities current versus future
Type Current
Settlement Cycle
Reporting Time
Commit / BTB Time
Future Settlement
Cycle
Reporting Time
Commit / BTB Time
Depository Receipts
Min T+1 15h00 (S-1) 17h00 (S-1) Min T+0 18h00 (S) 18h00 (S)
Depository Receipts on RD
Not permitted on RD
Min T+0 09h00 (S) 10h00 (S)
Off-markets T+5 12h30 (S-2) 17h00 (S-2) T+3 12h00 (S-1) 15h00 (S-1)
Acct Transfers
Min T+0 18h00 (S)
18h00 (S) Min T+0 18h00 (S) 18h00 (S)
Acct Transfers on RD
N/A where elective CA
Min T+0 09h00 (S) 10h00 (S)
22
Off-markets activities current versus future (cont.)
Type Current
Settlement Cycle
Reporting Time
Commit / BTB Time
Future Settlement
Cycle
Reporting Time
Commit / BTB Time
Portfolio Moves
Min T+0 18h00 (S) 18h00 (S) Min T+0 18h00 (S) 18h00 (S)
Portfolio Moves on RD
N/A where elective CA
Min T+0 09h00 (S) 10h00 (S)
Off-market SLB
Min T+1 15h00 (S-1) 17h00 (S-1) Min T+0 13h00 (S) 15h00 (S)
SLB BP Min T+1 15h00 (S-1) 17h00 (S-1) Min T+0 13h00 (S) 13h00 (S)
SLB Rev Substitution
Min T+1 10h00 (S-1) 12h00 (S-1) Min T+1 17h00 (S-1) 18h00 (S-1)
SLB Returns (Off-market and BPs)
Min T+0 (BPs)
09h00 (S) 10h00 (S) Min T+0 17h30 (S) 17h00 (S)
23
Off-markets activities current versus future (cont.)
Type Current
Settlement Cycle
Reporting Time
Commit / BTB Time
Future Settlement
Cycle
Reporting Time
Commit / BTB Time
Off-market SLB on RD
N/A Min T+0 09h00 (S) 10h00 (S)
SLB BP on RD Min T+0 09h00 (S) 10h00 (S) Min T+0 09h00 (S) 10h00 (S)
Same day SLB Returns (Off-markets and BP on RD
Min T+0 (BPs)
09h00 (S) 10h00 (S) Min T+0 09h00 (S) 10h00 (S)
24
Mandatory Events Corporate Actions
25
Mandatory Event Corporate Actions activities
Action Current Timing - T+5 Future Timings - T+3
Declaration Date RD-15 RD-13 or earlier
Finalization Date RD-10 RD-8
LDT RD-5 RD-3
First day to trade new entitlement RD-4 RD-2
RD RD RD
Payment Date RD+1 RD+1
Settlements for new entitlements RD+1 RD+1
26
Mandatory Event Information
The minimum required information on Declaration Date for Mandatory Events will be:
Last Day to Trade (Cum), Ex Date, Record Date and Expected Pay Date
Cash Rates and Share Ratios can be announced no later than Finalisation Date by 12h00
Exceptions to this will be dealt with on a case by case basis
If applicable (Mandatory Security or Mandatory Cash and Security): Delisting Date/Termination Date, Suspension Date, Effective Date
New ISIN
Should not all information have been made available on Declaration Date then the cut off date for the Event Finalisation should be no later than 12h00 on Finalisation Date
Exceptions to this will be dealt with on a case by case basis
Record Date will always be a Friday. In the event of a Public Holiday, Record Date will be the previous business day
27
Elective Event Corporate Action cycle
28
Elective Event Corporate Actions activities
Action Current Timing - T+5 Future Timings - T+3
Declaration Date RD-15 RD-13 or earlier
Finalization Date RD-10 RD-8
LDT RD-5 RD-3
First day to trade new entitlement RD-4 RD-2
Election RD (13h00) RD (13h00)
RD RD RD
Payment Date RD+1 RD+1
Settlements for new entitlements RD+1 RD+1
29
Elective Event Information
The minimum required information on Declaration Date for Elective Events will be:
Last Day to Trade (Cum), Ex-Date, Record Date, Election Deadline Date and
Expected Pay Date
Cash Rates and Share Ratios can be announced no later than 12h00 on
Finalisation Date
Default Option and whether Part Elections and/or Restrictions are applicable
Elections will be sent to Strate by the CSDPs at 13h00 with possible
amendments being submitted up until 14h00. CSDPs and brokers will update
their client mandates to ensure that they receive their clients’ elections
timeously to align to these agreed timelines
Amended elections will only be allowed in the event that the JSE’s fail trade
procedures affect elections
Strate to forward Election Instructions to Transfer Secretary at 15h00
30
Fails Management by JSE Settlement Authority
Primary
Securities Lending and Borrowing
Money Lending and Borrowing
Then
Rolling of Settlement:
If circumstances are correct
Then
Failed Trade:
Retransactions
Compensation
For Failed Trade procedures we need to find opposite transactions
Failed Trade procedures
31
Back-to-Back Links – MT 598-103
MT598-103
Same settlement cycle
Must include details of linked transactions:
On-Market report only
SLB
Collateral
Account Transfer
Portfolio move
SLB return
Collateral return
Off-markets
Could be multiple links
32
Back-to-Back Links – MT 598-104
MT598-104
Future settlement cycle
Must include details of linked transactions:
On-Market report only
SLB
Collateral
Account Transfer
Portfolio move
SLB return
Collateral return
Off-markets
Could be multiple links
33
BDA terminating and non-terminating transactions
ECS will request terminating and non-terminating transactions from BDA
BDA will supply:
Controlled Clients transactions; and
Broker proprietary – net amount
34
Equities Clearing System (ECS)
Updates from Strate for links
MT598-103
MT598-104
Failed Trade procedures
Look for a terminating transaction:
Equal and opposite; then
Highest to lowest
Look for a non-terminating transaction with least impact:
Account transfers
Portfolio move
Collateral
SLB return
Off-market
Then
Equal and opposite; then
Highest to lowest
35
Message instruction
MT598-116
Advising instrument with potential problems
This could happen multiple times
MT598-117
Settlement orders selected for Failed Trade procedures
MT598-118
Problem resolved
MT598-117 is sent to STRATE and the CSDP.
Strate will lift the commit based on this message and break links where applicable.
36
ECS will: 1. Generate cancellation to Strate for Client B to cancel purchase (MT 598-117 and then MT 598-122) 2. Generate Settlement Order for Broker D (purchase) to replace failing trade for Client B 3. Generate Settlement Orders to move purchase from Broker D ROS settlement account to Broker C’s
Reverse Sub account 4. Hold margin for original failing deal – Client A Sale
S P
100 AAA
R500 (4)
S P
S P
100 AAA
R500
0
100 AAA
R500(598-113) 100 AAA (3)
R1,000 (598-113)
R500
Compulsory
Reverse Substitution
100 AAA
R1,000
0
BDA to cancel original
Contract Note
100 AAA (1)
R1,000 (598-122)
S P
100 AAA (3)
R1,000(598-113) 100 AAA (2)
R1,000 (598-113)
0
Non-Controlled Client Acct
Client A
Non-Controlled Client Acct
Client B
Reverse Subs Acct
Broker C
ROS suspense Acct
Broker D
Flows Fails Management Rolling of Settlement
37
ECS will: 1. Generate Settlement Orders for future settlement date 2. Return Margin held for original failing deal (Client A sale) once settled 3. Generate message to BDA with defaulting and non-defaulting transaction details including future
settlement date
Flows Fails Management Rolling of Settlement
S P
100 AAA
R500 (2)
S P
S P
100 AAA
R500
100 AAA
100 AAA
R500 100 AAA
R1,000
0
Broker C to
Do manual
Allocation
100 AAA
R1,000 100 AAA
R1,000 100 AAA (1)
R1,000 (598-113)
100 AAA
100 AAA (1)
R1,000 (598-113)
100 AAA
R500
100 AAA
R500
BDA to issue new
Contract note for new
Settlement date
S P
100 AAA
R1,000
100 AAA (2)
R1,000 (598-113)
0
100 AAA (1)
R1,000 (598-113) 100 AAA (1)
R1,000 (598-113)
Non-Controlled Client Acct
Client A Non-Controlled Client Acct
Client B
Reverse Subs Acct
Broker C
ROS suspense Acct
Broker D
38
T+3 Project
Market Communication
Flows Fails Management Retransaction
38
Settlement Authority will -
1. Generate cancellation to Strate for Client B to cancel purchase (MT 598-117 and then
MT 598-122)
2. Generate Settlement Order for Broker D (purchase) to replace failing trade for client B
3. Generate Settlement Orders to move purchase from Broker D’s Failed Trade suspense
acct to Broker C’s Rev Sub Acct
S P
100 AAA
R500
S P
S P
100 AAA
R500
0
100 AAA
R500(598-113) 100 AAA (3)
R1,000 (598-113)
R500
Compulsory
Reverse Substitution
100 AAA
R1,000
0
BDA to cancel original
Contract Note
100 AAA (1)
R1,000 (598-122)
S P
100 AAA (3)
R1,000(598-113) 100 AAA (2)
R1,000 (598-113)
0
Non-Controlled Client Acct
Client A
Non-Controlled Client Acct
Client B
Reverse Subs Acct
Broker C
Failed Trade Suspense Acct
Broker D
39
T+3 Project
Market Communication
Flows Fails Management Retransaction
39
S P
100 AAA
R500 (2)
S P
S P
100 AAA
R500
0
100 AAA
R500
100 AAA
R1,000
R500
100 AAA
R1,000
0
100 AAA
R1,000 100 AAA (1)
R1,000 (598-113)
BDA to issue new
Contract note for new
Settlement date
ECS will -
1. Generate Settlement Orders for future settlement when re-transacted to move re-booked
purchase to Client B
2. When re-transaction done send update message to BDA with future settlement
transactions
3. Return Margin held for original failing trade – Client A Sale once settled
S P
R500
100 AAA
R1,000
Re-transaction 100 AAA (1)
R1,000 (598-113)
CLAIM LOSS/PROFIT
100 AAA
R1,000
100 AAA
R1,500
Non-Controlled Client Acct
Client A
Non-Controlled Client Acct
Client B
Reverse Subs Acct
Broker C
Failed Trade Suspense Acct
Broker D
40
T+3 Project
Market Communication
Flows Fails Management Compensation
40
S P
100 AAA
R500 (4)
S P
S P
100 AAA
R500
0
100 AAA
R500(598-113) 100 AAA (3)
R1,000 (598-113)
R500
Compulsory
Reverse Substitution
100 AAA
R1,000
0
BDA to cancel original
Contract Note
100 AAA (1)
R1,000 (598-122)
S P
100 AAA (3)
R1,000(598-113) 100 AAA (2)
R1,000 (598-113)
0
ECS will -
1. Generate cancellation to Strate for Client B to cancel purchase (MT 598-117 and
then MT 598-122)
2. Generate Settlement Order for Broker D (purchase) to replace failing trade for client B
3. Generate settlement orders to move purchase from Broker D’s ROS suspense acct to
Broker C’s Rev Sub Acct
4. Margin retained by ECS for original failing trade – Client A Sale
Non-Controlled Client Acct
Client A
Non-Controlled Client Acct
Client B
Reverse Subs Acct
Broker C
Failed Trade Suspense Acct
Broker D
41
T+3 Project
Market Communication
Flows Fails Management Compensation
41
S P
100 AAA
R500
S P
S P
100 AAA
R500
0
100 AAA
R500
100 AAA
R1,000
R500
Compulsory
Reverse Substitution
100 AAA
R1,000
0
100 AAA
R1,000
S P
100 AAA
R1,000
100 AAA
R1,000
0
COMPENSATION PAID
1. Release margin to Broker A once compensations has settled
Non-Controlled Client Acct
Client A
Non-Controlled Client Acct
Client B
Reverse Subs Acct
Broker A
Failed Trade Suspense Acct
Broker D
42
Margin under T+3
Under T+3 settlement the JSE will margin at EOD T+1 (collect on morning
of T+2 respectively) – 35 to 40% of trades will be margined – figures
depending on how market practice will adjust
Margin will be retained in the case of Fails Management and returned on
final settlement of the transaction:
Rolling of Settlement
Retransactions
Compensation
43
Change in practice
JSE has moved to real-time systems – members may do allocations on a
real-time basis on T and commits to flow on T
Market practice will change – Investors will send instructions and CSDPs
will commit on T or T+1
Per JSE Rules and Directives – brokers can claim margin from clients
44
Commits statistics
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Jan-0
5M
ar-
05
Ma
y-0
5Jul-0
5S
ep-0
5N
ov-0
5Jan-0
6M
ar-
06
Ma
y-0
6Jul-0
6S
ep-0
6N
ov-0
6Jan-0
7M
ar-
07
Ma
y-0
7Jul-0
7S
ep-0
7N
ov-0
7Jan-0
8M
ar-
08
Ma
y-0
8Jul-0
8S
ep-0
8N
ov-0
8Jan-0
9M
ar-
09
Ma
y-0
9Jul-0
9S
ep-0
9N
ov-0
9Jan-1
0M
ar-
10
Ma
y-1
0Jul-1
0S
ep-1
0N
ov-1
0Jan-1
1M
ar-
11
Ma
y-1
1Jul-1
1S
ep-1
1N
ov-1
1Jan-1
2M
ar-
12
Ma
y-1
2Jul-1
2S
ep-1
2N
ov-1
2Jan-1
3M
ar-
13
Ma
y-1
3Jul-1
3S
ep-1
3N
ov-1
3Jan-1
4M
ar-
14
Perc
en
tag
e
Date
Average Monthly Commits Non-controlled Clients
Percentage committed EOD T+1 Percentage committed EOD T+2 Percentage EOD T+3
45
New status intimations
New MT 548 - Reasons for uncommits
No securities
No clients instructions
Timings:
• EOD T;
• Real-time T+1; and
• Real-time T+2.
46
Fractions and spreadsheets
Raised in 2009
Recently approved at CSDP Forum
Investigating implementing before T+3 Phase III
Preferred option as previously agreed
VWAP on LDT+1 less 10% (for market movements) used for fraction payment;
JSE to announce rate so everyone uses same rate; and
Surplus shares sold by participant / broker to cover pay out.
Spreadsheets will remain for
IPO’s;
Excess Take Up; and
Dual listed companies where home Exchanges regulations prevail.
47
Freezing of registers
Dual Listed companies
Freeze registers once currency conversion is booked – aligned to JSEs Listing
Requirements
Securities can’t move between registers – creates settlement problems
Change – currency conversion on LDT-1 and announcement to the market
48
Migration
W T F M T W T F M T
T T+1 T+2 C T+3 T+4 T+5
T T+1 O T+2 T+3 T+4 T+5
T N T+1 T+2 T+3 T+4 T+5
V T T+1 T+2 T+3 CA
E T T+1 T+2 T+3 CA
R T T+1 T+2 T+3
S T T+1 T+2 T+3
I T T+1 T+2
O
N LDT RD/RD PD/PD
49
Recap of BDA T+3 phase 2 and other automation:
Automation of Prime Broking Transactions
Real Time Deal Management
Real Time Contract Notes
Same Day Allocations Upload
Same Day Deals Upload
CLMNT Upload
Demat Holding Upload
Corporate Actions Elective Events upload
Functionality provided in previous phases
50
Migration assumptions
Limit amount of Corporate Actions (including IPO’s/private placements) if
possible
Move to a RD-3 LDT date – no LDT on Friday of conversion
Jobbing across settlement days – warn members about SLBs and funding
for a period of time
Resources will be available across the market for 2 weeks after go-live to
manage issues
Migration will not take place over a month-end
Migration will not take place over a futures close-out
51
T+3 Project
Market Communication
Agenda
• Overview of the move to T+3
• Structure of the JSE’s T+3 project
• Detailed walkthrough of the Phase 3 scope
• Explaining the sub-phases in Phase 3
• Training & User Readiness
• Risks / Issues / Questions
52
T+3 Update Timeline review and overall progress update
Phase 3 Timeline
2015 2016 2014
SEP JUNE MAY APR MAR FEB JAN DEC NOV DEC NOV OCT OCT SEP AUG JUL JUN MAY APR MAR FEB JAN JUL
SIT Cycle 1 Internal
UAT Cycle 1
Regression Cycle
SYT (7 iterations)
ECS Development
SIT Cycle 2 Internal
Scheduled to
start beginning
September
SIT Cycle 3
External
SIT Cycle 4
External
SIT Cycle 5
External
Scheduled to
start end Oct
Strate ready for testing on
new code base
September
4 C
SD
P’s
re
ad
y fo
r in
teg
ratio
n
Au
g –
Se
pte
mb
er
3 C
SD
P’s
re
ad
y fo
r in
teg
ratio
n
en
d O
cto
be
r
1 C
SD
P r
ea
dy fo
r in
teg
ratio
n
Fe
bru
ary
UAT Cycle 2
User Training
Refresher Training
Ready for
go-live May –
July 2016
53
T+3 Update Testing – market involvement
• Timing of phases:
• Required participation per phase:
• Pre-SIT Activities
• Initial reference data set-up
• Test pack review
• Per test cycle:
• Reference data review and health check (two days prior to test execution)
• Test pack refinement
• Test execution
• Results audit (2 days post test execution)
• Environment refresh (2 days prior to the next test phase)
SIT – Cycle 3 Scheduled to start
end Oct 2015
CSDPs (Voluntary)
SIT – Cycle 4 Scheduled to start
mid Nov 2015
CSDPs (Compulsory)
SIT – Cycle 5 Scheduled to start
mid Jan 2016
CSDPs (Compulsory) / Members (Voluntary)
UAT – Cycle 1 Scheduled to start
beginning Feb 2016
CSDPs & Members (Compulsory)
UAT – Cycle 2 Scheduled to start
end Mar 2016
CSDPs & Members (Compulsory)
54
Go-live communication
After a large portion of testing has been completed by affected parties a
narrower period for go-live will be announced
This is expected to be announced to the market in November 2015 - after
System Integration Testing (SIT) has started and good progress has been
made on the scheduled testing
The go-live dates will only be communicated after consultation with:
T+3 Market Steering committee
Clearing and Settlement Advisory Committee (CSAC)
The exact go-live date will be announced after first cycle of User
Acceptance Testing in 2016
55
May
Ap
r
Mar
System Integration Testing Graphical Overview (Dynamic Testing)
FUNCTIONAL / TECHNICAL EXECUTION
2015 2016
Dec
No
v
Oct
Sept
Au
g
Feb
Jan
Ref.
Data
Alignm
ent /
Backu
p
21 - 28
Aug
Cycle 1 Internal (Incl.
Migration) 31 Aug – 22
Sep
Cycle 1 External
(Incl. Migration) 22 Oct – 18
Nov
Cycle 2 External
(Incl. Migration)
19 Nov – 11 Dec
Cycle 3 External
(Excl. Migration) 11 Jan – 03
Feb
Final Benchmarking and reporting 03 Feb – 15 April
LIMITED
TESTING
(b
ased
on
availability)
14
DEC
– 06
JAN
STRATE
23-Sep
Cycle 2 Internal (Incl. Migration) 23 Sep – 21 Oct
System Performance Testing (SPT) 25 Aug – 20 Oct
Integrated Performance Testing (IPT) 25 Nov – 02 Feb
56
09
06
05
04
03
02
System Integration Testing Graphical Task Overview
Integration Testing Cycle 3 (Migration Testing)
November
28
27
26
23
22
30
29
17
16
13
12
11
10
18
October
Development, Support and Training
Revert to backup B 22 – 23 Oct
Communicate Test Scenarios covered in
the cycles to the market
26 – 27 Oct
Settlement Cycle 1 (old)
Settlement Cycle 2 (old)
Settlement Cycle 3 (old)
Settlement Cycle 4 (old)
Settlement Cycle 1 (new)
Settlement Cycle 2 (new)
Settlement Cycle 3 (new)
Settlement Cycle 4 (new)
Settlement Cycle 5 (old)
Settlement Cycle 5 (new)
Settlement Cycle 6 (new)
Convert batch (BCX/JSE)
(Internal JSE action) 03 / 04 Nov
Testing Audit, Market Meeting and cycle 4
adjustments. 17 – 18 Nov
Bug Fixing / Retest 17 – 18 Nov
Perform Health Checks
26 - 27 Oct (CA Events) LDT 02 Nov
(4 events)
(CA Events) LDT = 05 Nov
(4 events)
(CA Events) LDT = 09 Nov
(4 events)
57
07
04
03
02
01
30
System Integration Testing Graphical Task Overview
Integration Testing Cycle 4 (Migration Testing)
December
25
24
23
20
19
27
26
11
10
09
08
November
14
Development, Support and Training
Revert to backup B 19 – 20 Nov
Communicate Test Scenarios covered in
the cycles to the market
23 – 24 Nov
Settlement Cycle 1 (old)
Settlement Cycle 2 (old)
Settlement Cycle 3 (old)
Settlement Cycle 4 (old)
Settlement Cycle 1 (new)
Settlement Cycle 2 (new)
Settlement Cycle 3 (new)
Settlement Cycle 4 (new)
Settlement Cycle 5 (old)
Settlement Cycle 5 (new)
Convert batch (BCX/JSE)
(Internal JSE action) 01 / 02 Nov
Perform Health Checks 23 – 24 Nov
BDA Year-end
11 Dec
(CA Events) LDT = 01 Dec
(4 events)
(CA Events) LDT = 03 Dec
(4 events)
Dummy Public Holiday 02 Dec
Testing Audit, Market Meeting and cycle 5
adjustments. 10 – 11 Dec
58
27
26
25
22
21
20
System Integration Testing (cont.) Graphical Task Overview
Integration Testing cycle 5 (Migration Testing)
February
15
14
13
12
11
19
18
02
01
29
28
January
03
Development, Support and Training
Revert to backup B 11 – 12 Jan
Communicate Test Scenarios covered in
the cycles to the market
13 – 14 Jan
Settlement Cycle 1 (old)
Settlement Cycle 2 (old)
Settlement Cycle 3 (old)
Settlement Cycle 4 (old)
Settlement Cycle 1 (new)
Settlement Cycle 2 (new)
Settlement Cycle 3 (new)
Settlement Cycle 4 (new)
Settlement Cycle 5 (old)
Settlement Cycle 5 (new)
Settlement Cycle 6 (new)
Convert batch (BCX/JSE)
(Internal JSE action) 21 / 22 Feb
BDA Month-end 29 May
Perform Health Checks 13 – 14 Jan
(CA Events) LDT = 20 Jan
(4 events)
(CA Events) LDT = 25 Jan
(4 events)
(CA Events) LDT = 28 Jan
(4 events)
59
Entry and Exit Criteria System Integration Testing
Entry-Criteria
Market documentation reviewed and signed off
Agreed and signed off test packs
Internal and external stakeholders
Market Test Plan completed, reviewed and signed off
Data aligned across applications and all relevant backups are completed
Internal and external stakeholders
Infrastructure verification tests complete (including configuration and connectivity)
Applications and services are operational in the test environment across all applications – Participants to manage internally
No defects with severity of critical or high are open from previous phase
Deviation could occur under the following circumstances
The defect does not affect any key component within your application
The Project team in conjunction with the affected market participant agree to continue with state of defect
60
Entry and Exit Criteria System Integration Testing
Exit-Criteria
All test procedures for a cycle is successfully executed by each market participant
Test results recorded in the agreed test management tool – Participants to manage internally
Screen shots, printouts, actual result, etc. attached to the test case in the test management tool - Participants to manage
internally
Approval for all test cases that are not executed i.e. deferred or not applicable is
quality assured by the Test Manager
All defects with severity of critical and high is fixed and retested during the cycle
Cycle will be extended, if required, to meet the above – Will be agreed by the market
Agreed resolution of all medium and low severity defects
Pass rate is greater than equal to a specified percentage
Pass rate is measured across all applications involved in the cycle
61
T+3 Project
Market Communication
Agenda
• Overview of the move to T+3
• Structure of the JSE’s T+3 project
• Detailed walkthrough of the Phase 3 scope
• Explaining the sub-phases in Phase 3
• Training & User Readiness
• Risks / Issues / Questions
62
T+3 Update Proposed training plan - brokers
• The following is the proposed plan for training – details will be confirmed in conjunction with
the T3 Marketing and Education Committee
• Timing - 2 training phases are envisioned:
• 1st phase in Jan / Feb 2016 for UAT participants and general market participants
• Structure:
• Entire programme lasts 6 hours - split into 2 modules (3 hours each)
• 2 x 3 hour sessions to be run each day (sessions will be alternated to give attendees flexibility)
• 5 total sessions to be run in the week - presentation style (auditorium)
• Planned training agenda:
1. Intro and T3 overview
2. T5 to T3 process changes
3. BDA changes demo
4. ECS changes demo
5. Elective Events (Corporate Actions)
6. Fails Management
7. Migration week - Process
63
T+3 Update User Readiness - Planned comms events (cont.)
• Educational Materials:
• Description: User guides / brochures / manuals explaining the move to T3 and additional concepts contained therein
• Frequency: Multiple drops – July to November
• Purpose: To enhance the knowledge of participants impacted by T3, to enable them to transition to the shorter settlement cycle
• Planned content:
1. T+3 Guide – JSE (Aug)
2. T+3 FAQs – JSE (Aug)
3. T+5 to T+3 process timelines – JSE (Aug)
4. Fails Management Process (to include roles
and responsibilities of SASLA & CSDPs) (Sep)
5. SLB Document – SASLA (Sep)
6. Corporate Actions Document – Strate (Sep)
7. Removal Process (Transfer Secs) – JSE (Sep)
8. SLB Tax Document – SASLA (Oct)
9. SLB Corporate Actions Document – SASLA (Oct)
10. Settlement Obligations Document – JSE (Oct)
11. Migration Document – JSE (OCT)
12. JSE & Strate Rules & Directives – JSE & Strate (Nov)
64
T+3 Update User Readiness - Planned comms events (cont.)
• Roadshows / Conferences:
• Description: External presentations to stakeholders (local and foreign) regarding the T3 project
• Frequency: Multiple sessions
• Purpose: To allow impacted stakeholders not based in JHB to attend T3-focussed presentations and engage with project staff
• Planned schedule:
• July 2015 - Namibian Stock Exchange visit
• August 2015 - Buy-side Roadshow (CT)
• November 2015 - Buy-side Visit (CT) / NEMA Africa (LDN) / JSE Roadshow event (LDN)
• February / March 2016 – potential UK/USA roadshow (TBC)
• March / April 2016 – CT visit
65
Current T+3 Committees
T+3 Market and Educational Committee
Purpose: to agree the approach and plan for all market-facing User Readiness activities
Current focus:
Review educational paraphernalia to be circulated to the market
Assist with setting up roadshows and meetings
T+3 Market Steering Committee
Purpose: to review market readiness and updates and agree any future steps
Project Managers
Purpose : to review milestones and updates
Test Managers
Purpose: agree and manage testing requirements
66
T+3 Project
Market Communication
Agenda
• Overview of the move to T+3
• Structure of the JSE’s T+3 project
• Detailed walkthrough of the Phase 3 scope
• Explaining the sub-phases in Phase 3
• Training & User Readiness
• Risks / Issues / Questions
67
External risks and Issues
Risk Risk Description Mitigation Risk Factor
External
External unforeseen (black swan events)
Unforeseen major events – the length of the program, geo political, economic or JSE industry factors – could change the landscape and affect T+3 viability and delivery
• Monitor the external environment for changes • Incorporate outcomes from stress testing and group
economics analysis • Accept residual risk in the event that a black swan
happens. We may be forced to focus senior resources on the resolution of the black swan event instead of T+3
Unanticipated regulatory demand
Any unknown legislative or regulatory changes might dilute focus and compromise market commitment
• Continuous monitoring of legislative and regulatory developments and assessing impacts as and when they arise
• Deferring changes where possible if they impact the T+3 project
Perception that the global precedent is moving
Global markets are moving to T+2, while South Africa is currently only implementing a T+3 cycle
• Continue to reinforce the reason why agreement was reached on a target of T+3 with both the FSB and the market
• Ensure delivery to target timeline to avoid delays (and circumventing further pressure to move directly to T+2)
68
External risks and Issues
Risk Risk Description Mitigation Risk Factor
Market
Competing industry initiatives dilute focus and compromise market commitment
The JSE’s T+3 project is one of many concurrent industry initiatives. While the market has agreed to rank T+3 as the top priority industry initiative, they have warned that a delay in timelines will cause them to re-evaluate priorities and shift delivery focus to other projects.
• Ongoing engagement with market participants to ensure commitment. • High confidence planning to ensure on-time delivery
Market readiness / behavioral changes
There is a concern that the market and participants may not be ready for T+3 (i.e. brokers and fund managers have current processes based on T+5 and may not be prepared for T+3 processes) which will compromise go-live.
• User readiness activities include road shows, communication and educational documentation to be distributed to market participants. • Meetings are frequently being held with various stakeholders from the market to confirm progress on their systems and readiness in line with their planned schedules. • Extensive communication is underway to the market explaining the benefits of the move to T+3. • Early and regular engagement with clients during the course of the project. • Upfront consideration given to the technical impacts on clients.
Offshore market readiness
International investors that arbitrage trade in dual listed stocks on a T+2 cycle in the UK (and a T+5 cycle in SA) might not move shares between registers within the allocated time to meet the new settlement cycle requirements.
• Extensive communication and education about the move to T+3. • Work with transfer secretaries to identify and introduce more efficient processes for the removal of shares between markets. • Increase liquidity for securities lending and borrowing.
69
Questions
70
Broker Workgroup - Post Trade STP (Equities)
• Workgroup comprises Institutional Broker Members
• Initiated this 2015Q2, initially to tackle challenges faced by Brokers with 3rd Party vendors offering electronic confirmation /matching platforms to BuySide clients.
• Identified the need to review the evolving Equities Post Trade landscape in SA.
• Formalised monthly meetings, with adhoc/as needed sub project teams to tackle certain initiatives/challenges.
Background
• To establish best practice, guidelines and education of broker members, fund managers, vendors, JSE as regards current practice, challenges, current process of post trade confirmation between all market participants and critical success factors for T+3
• To engage with 3rd party Vendors, JSE, Investment Administrators, FundManager groups as a group with common purpose, to drive towards an efficient and cost effective post trade landscape within SA market for all participants
Objectives
• Assessing the current challenges faced by the broker members, with the view to socialise with Fund Managers, Investment Administrators and JSE to solution these existing challenges
• Regular engagement with 3rd Party Vendors (Omgeo, Bloomberg and Iriss)
Current Actions
• Engage with Fund Managers/Representatives in understanding their current challenges in the post trade environment
• Socialise amongst all market participants T+3 critical success factors. Next Actions