THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

19
THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner

Transcript of THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

Page 1: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

THE MISSOURI BUDGET

AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner

Page 2: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

• Overview of Missouri’s state budget

• Nature of the federal stimulus package

• The state’s current balance sheet

• The outlook for higher education budgets

• Challenges for Southeast Missouri State

Page 3: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

Don’t we have $23 billion dollars?

Yes, but . . . $7.8 billion are federal funds for dedicated purposes (Medicaid, K-12, public safety).

$7.5 billion are “other funds” for dedicated purposes, such as the conservation sales tax, gas taxes, gaming proceeds.

So that leaves us with about $7.8 billion of general revenue – discretionary dollars.

Page 4: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

Where does the $7.8 billion go?

Page 5: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

The Current Situation

• The State finished FY 2009 about $550 million below FY 2008.

• FY 2010 collections are expected to be down another 6.5%, $480m below FY 2009.

• So if it weren’t for the stimulus money, we would be around $1 billion in the hole.

• The projected growth for FY 2011 (3.6%) will still leave the State $775 million behind FY 2008.

Page 6: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

What about federal stimulus funds?

Stimulus v. Stabilization

Stimulus – direct grants and competitive opportunities

Stabilization – “free money” for states to preserve programs and services (and FMAP)

Page 7: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

How reliant are we on stabilization money?

• There is currently about $1.2 billion in the FY 2010 operating budget.

• About $775 million is in the regular operating budget – mostly supporting on-going programs/services like higher education.

• The remainder is primarily in the capital improvements budget – one-time expenditures.

Page 8: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

FY 2010 Spending of “Education” Stabilization Funds

Reduce State Funding to FY 2006 level, then backfill to FY 2009 level with stabilization funds:

$104,786,639 Higher Education Institutions$479,413,871 K-12 Foundation Formula $584,200,510 TOTAL

$188,971,825 FY 2011 Remaining FBS Funds

Page 9: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

But really, what kind of shape is the state budget in now?

Page 10: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.
Page 11: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.
Page 12: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

What are the implications for higher education funding?

Page 13: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.
Page 14: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

FY 2011 Potential Scenario$961,515,803 FY 2010 Higher Education - base funding

-$104,786,639 less FBS funding used in FY 2010

$856,729,164 Base GR funding for FY 2011 (FY 06 level - cannot go below)

$35,680,807 plus Higher Education's proportion of remaining FBS money (18.5%)

$892,409,971 equals FY 2011 "no increase" base for Higher Education Institutions

-$69,105,832 shortfall from FY 2010 level (-7.2% )

Page 15: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

What about FY 2012 and beyond?

• Without some other intervention – we’ll finally be forced to live within our means.

• Any withholdings or FY 2011 cuts will have to become permanent, and other major reductions will have to take place.

• The business of state government will have to fundamentally change.

Page 16: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

How to approach the problem?

• Hancock II

• Missouri’s political culture

• The Governor’s approach

• Letters from the Budget Director

• The Governor’s actions

Page 17: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

Challenges for Southeast Missouri State

• Unfunded FTE growth

• Existing demographics

• Emerging demographics

• Regional relationships – cooperation or competition

Page 18: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

Advantages for Southeast Missouri State

• Entrepreneurial focus

• Flexibility and responsiveness

• Broad mission

• ________________________

Page 19: THE MISSOURI BUDGET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Paul Wagner, Deputy Commissioner.

QUESTIONS3515 Amazonas Drive

Jefferson City, MO 65109Phone: (573) 751-2361

Fax: (573) 751-6635Info. Center: (800) 473-6757

[email protected]