The MINA Project

8
The MINA Project The MINA Project Model of an Intense Nonscaling Accelerator Hadron H H

description

The MINA Project. H. M odel of an I ntense N onscaling A ccelerator. H adron. Beam Parameters. Injection Extraction Kinetic Energy, keV218817 b Momentum, keV/c5201,226 Magnetic Rigidity, G-m17.3440.89 Revol. Freq., MHz11.8115.20 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The MINA Project

The MINA ProjectThe MINA Project

Model of an Intense Nonscaling Accelerator

Hadron

HH

Beam ParametersBeam Parameters Injection Extraction

Kinetic Energy, keV 218 817Momentum, keV/c 520 1,226Magnetic Rigidity, G-m 17.34 40.89Revol. Freq., MHz 11.81 15.20Revolution Period, µs 0.085 0.066Repetition Rate, Hz 2.5 – 5.0No. Electrons / Cycle 5.5 x 1011

Full Emittance, norm., π mm-mrad 100 Space-Charge Circulating Current, mA 103 134Number of Injected Turns 100Injection Period, µs 10

SBIR-MINHASBIR-MINHA

Circumference 18.1097 m

Number of Periods 48

Period Length 37.73 cm

Long Drift (2s) 16.11 cm

Short Drift (g) 1.907 cm

F-sector Length 4.450 cm

Field at inj. –19.04 G

Gradient 3.58 kG/m

D-sector Length 8.900 cm

Field at inj. 44.55 G

Gradient –3.14 kG/m

cm

m

• Tracking studies of Sandro’s lattice with ICOOL

Tracking SimulationsTracking Simulations

Figure 1: Phase space plots from tracking 20 particles at injection (top) and extraction (bottom) momenta.

Tracking SimulationsTracking Simulations

• Tune variation versus momentum– Solid lines are matrix calculations, points are

from tracking

MagnetsMagnets• Evaluated conventional, PM and Current-

dominated (Panofsky) quads using Printed Circuit (PC) board coils.Quad Type Conventional Permanent

MagnetPanofsky (PC)

Aperture 5 cm dia. 5 cm dia 5 cm X 2 cm

Outer size > 15 cm OD 10 cm OD 10 X 5 cm

Excitation 100 Amp-turns NeFeB 1.2 T 54 Amp-turns

Cost ea. $3,500 $2,500 $500

Advantages • Adjustable• Scalable to large size• Good field quality

• Small size• Low cost• No power supplies

• Adjustable• Small size• Low cost• Shorter end-fields

Disadvantages • Expensive• Large and heavy

• Not (easily) adjustable

• Unproven design

MagnetsMagnets

• Shown here are copper coils, however for the required field, PC boards would suffice

Phase II ObjectivesPhase II Objectives

• Design magnets; build octant (6 Periods)• Design, build, purchase diagnostics and

gun• Perform experiment with octant and gun• Test ferrites and broadband materials

(finemet etc)• Design cavity for Phase III• Design/cost Phase III Model