The Matrix Point of Light

8/16/2019 The Matrix Point of Light

1/49

The matrix point of light

by Corrado Malanga

translated by Alessandra Zarone

Introduction

Many years ago, when we used the regressive hypnosis techniques, in one of these

hypnotic sessions, an abducted lady expressed herself with the voice of her soul as

follows.Then we asked her ! "ho are you#!, and her soul part soul replied

$% a& a &atrix of points of light!. At that ti&e, we did not well understand this expression

as we did not know what she &eant.The soul part of the abductee expressed in an

unusual way for us, that is odd, inco&prehensible. "hat did she &eant to say when shewas speaking about the &atrix of points of light# 'er soul part continued

$% a& a light in the light but you can not see it!. Many years have passed since then and

we do no &ore directly deal with the proble&s of abduction, nevertheless, &any years

after that hypnotic session, or &aybe today, we have the opportunity to understand what

the soul of this lady &eant to say.This article highlights the latest results we have achieved

by checking so&e data of conte&porary physics and astrophysics, in relation to the last

three articles, na&ed (videon, that we have previously published.

%n the previous articles, we described the nature of the universe using a key that hinged

on the real existence of the anti photon. )n that occasion, when we de&onstrated how the

&atter in the universe does not exist except as a different state of aggregation of photons

and anti*photons. (ither &atter or anti &atter, in different states of aggregation, provided

all the subato&ic particles we know today. "e had also highlighted, as it was the light to

create the &atter, we asserted, in particular, that the &atter appears to us not because it is

being touched or affected by the photons that, as particles of light, illu&inate it, although

the particles of light, appropriately aggregated with each other, created the &atter itself.

"e had also highlighted how all that appears, registered by our senses, does not really

exist as such but only as a possible interpretation of our brain that, as +arl ribra& affir&s,

no other would be than a hologra& reader.

Therefore, we would perceive reality around us and as we believe that it is. %n this context,

we asserted that we were the creators of this virtual reality that appeared in the way we

created it. %n other words, we believe that an ob-ect &ust be done in a certain way and we

create it that way, so thats why it appears in such a way. The awareness of being

ourselves the creators of the universe would be the only i&portant para&eter that &akes


2/49

us creating and perceiving the universe around us. /o, there would be no physical

principle of undeter&ination except to the extent that we ourselves believe

undeter&ination &ust exist. %f we, as the creators of virtual reality, are unaware of what we

are creating, then, the created things will appear to us as we believed they should appear.

0or instance, the belief of an external 1od, in this universe, who has created it, would putus in a situation where we &ight presu&e to have so&e li&itations in looking at the

universe, and the belief in these li&itations, unknowingly cause the creation of an

undeter&ined universe2 but if one had the knowledge that we ourselves are the creators

of the universe, then, it would not appear undeter&ined to us, but totally clear and

&easurable in every context.

/tarting fro& these observations, we wanted to investigate our potential ability to reali3e

that all that appears outside us and actually , is our own creation . "hat creates the virtualreality in its third di&ension is the &ind and not the spirit or the soul, as we have already

pointed out in the previous works .

"e will analy3e our ability to observe our outer world, in order to check whether the

observations &ade above,&ay fall within the canons of an $(videonic! interpretation,

through the study of perceptual pheno&ena, through the study of quantu& physics and

cos&ology , through the study of &yth.

Optical illusions

%f each of us is the creator of his virtual universe, conscential, how would it be possible to

think that the ob-ect % have before &e in this &o&ent and that % a& creating, is the sa&e

ob-ect that another living being is watching with &e#

%& looking at a tree along with a friend of &ine we both are observing the sa&e tree and

we believe to perceive it exactly in the sa&e way. As a &atter of fact, this is not true. I

believe to perceive that tree in the sa&e way &y friend perceives it, but after a careful

and deep analysis of the tree, we reali3e that we see two co&pletely different things. The

differences would not be due to a different ability to exa&ine the ob-ect we face, or to our

sub-ective powers of expression, but rather to the fact that each of us would create his

own tree, in his personal universe. The two trees would be very si&ilar but they wouldt be

the sa&e tree. 'ow to reali3e this#

0irst of all we have to check the perceptive capacity of the two observers, by asking the&

to draw the tree they have before. Then, beyond the expressive capabilities of each of the

two observers, two co&pletely different drawings would appear. Therefore, if we &ade

elaborated physical &easure&ents, we would reali3e that the electrons, the photons, the


3/49

subato&ic structure of the two trees would be co&pletely different .

%n the &acroscopic world, they would be s&all because s&all are the observable

differences in that coscential range of the two observers who observe the two trees, but in

the corresponding &icrocos&s,so the s&all differences would be put in evidence, showing

two co&pletely different creations. %n the previous works, we pointed out that &odernquantu& physics reali3ed it is not the tool to &ake the &easure but it is the operator

behind the instru&ent to do it.

"e shall not repeat the bibliographic citations we have already underlined in the previous

articles, to which % refer, but it is absolutely clear, until today, we have not sufficiently

reali3ed that the reality an observer perceives, is only his.

%n this context, the hu&an eye plays its part. 4ntil this &o&ent we have believed that if the

hu&an eye has a wrong perception, such an error results fro& an incorrect physiologicalfunctioning of the organ of sight. 0or exa&ple, a color*blind sees phase*shifted colors in

co&parison to the colors seen by a person not colorblind. 4ntil today it was thought to

-ustify these differences on a &alfunctioning of the co&ponents of the colorblind eye.

4nfortunately, the &odern neurophysiology tends to support that colors are not understood

and captured by the hu&an eye but built in the brain. %f so, it would be difficult to argue that

the eye of the colorblind functions incorrectly, if co&pared the eye of a person not color

blind.

https55it.&.wikipedia.org5wiki5Colore,

http55server6.fisica.unige.it57tuccio5//%/5visione.ht&l

http55www.lescien3e.it5news5896:59;59:5news5categori33are


4/49

/o the brain would decide whether a certain color is to be interpreted as such.

http55www.oliverio.it5ao5didattica5Cervello.ht&5?isione5visione.ht&.

"hat our eye sees is different fro& what our &ind perceives the i&age below is @absurd@,

although we reali3e the trick, we hardly connect our external perceptions to the rationality

of a &ental process, which is based on the idea of arranging the position of the ob-ects in

space, in a logical way, by the infor&ation that our brain possesses.


5/49

%n other words, our brain expects, by convention, to have a certain spatial pro-ection of

so&e ob-ects but at first glance, these perceptions, conventionally expected, cannot be

confir&ed. This perceptual dissonance between what the brain is expecting to understandand what it is actually reali3ing, the representation of the difference that exists between the

application of a &ental &odel, built by the experi&entation of life and a perceptive &odel

that does not follow any rule, except fro& enduring rules i&posed by the experience itself.

)ur brain then, would see the ob-ects as it would think they should be and not as they

actually are.

"hen this cognitive and perceptual dissonance is overwhel&ingly shown,our brain does

not know what to believe the rules of perception, that have been learned through theexperiences up to now # )r abandoning the &ental conventions in the for& of preset

patterns, relying to a personal perception that leads you to think that the final conclusion is

% a& the creator of the universe and % perceive it as % believe that it should be perceived #

Tricking the mind

%n the previous work, we had shown that it was the &ind, that part of us, with his

knowledge, that creates the external universe.

%f, then, it is the &ind to create the three*di&ensional shape of the apparent virtual

reality, it is itself to create the deception, by its not perfect self*awareness.

"e look at the following pictures.

0ro& the observation of these two i&ages, we can easily notice how the drawing of a cup*

shaped cup can be perceived or, alternatively, the i&age of two profiles of opposing faces.


6/49

%t &ay also be noted that our brain does not take as a reference point &ain white or black.

)ur perception does not choose which of the two hypotheses is the perceptual correct

looking at white or black.

The final choice is based on another aspect, na&ely the idea of perception itself.

%f we believe that we &ust perceive two faces, our brain perceives two faces but, if webelieve we &ust perceive a chalice, then, we will see the chalice.

)ur brain chooses therefore, not through a hierarchy of colors or an hypothesis of for&s

but rather by an idea of what to perceive.

"hen a sub-ect has i&&ediately perceived one of two hypotheses, for instance, the two

faces profile, and it is pointed out that his perception &ay have another visual solution,

then, his brain will strive to i&agine in the other perceptual hypothesis, until it can perceive

it. As a &atter of fact, there is neither a pair of opposite faces, nor the shape of a cup, butthere is only what we want it to appear. %n other words, and in a larger sense, we ourselves

switch on the pixels that create the sense of the virtual reality we are observing, in our

brain .

The expression @turn the pixel@, is the true essence of perception in virtual reality.

%n other words, we could assert, at a perceptual level, that the universe around us is &ade

only by photons, which represent the infor&ation of virtual reality. "e, as creators of it, turn

on and turn off, that is, we give life to the perception that we ourselves create

unconsciously . %n this perceptual &odel our brain is still sub-ected to those &ental &odels

we have built within us, by the instru&ent of experience.

eter&ine whether so&ething is farther or closer to us, longer or shorter, deep or higher,

exclusively depends on certain para&eters that &ake our perception believe we are

seeing -ust what we are expecting to observe.


7/49

0ro& the observation of these two figures, we reali3e that our perception &akes us

believe that so&e arrows are longer than others when, in fact, they all have the sa&e

length. As one can easily notice, our perception is not at all affected by the vertical or

hori3ontal position of the arrows, but it is not even affected by white or black color.

"hile our eyes provide an electrical sti&ulus to the brain, it is totally independent of theinterpretation that the brain will give. %f a sub-ect is convinced to see very well, he will do it

but if a person believes to be short*sighted it will beco&e short*sighted. The &ind, in that

context, will alter the virtual part of the universe, deputed to the vision, adapting it to our

sti&ulus. %n other words, we could say that you beco&e blind if you think you have to be

as well as you heal fro& your blindness if you think you have to see very well.

/o, it is not the perceptual pheno&enon in itself that deceives our senses but its our

senses to believe they &ust see so&ething, that does not exist, to be unwittingly

deceived by their own belief. The deception takes place on the three spatial di&ensions,

ti&e and energy that are the three funda&ental aspects of the virtual universe, as we can

see in the exa&ples given below


8/49

This exa&ple shows us how our brain is trying to see so&ething to which it gives a

sensible for&, within the canons of &ental expectations but in reality, they do not nearly

correspond to the ob-ectivity of it.

"hat to believe, therefore, to what we perceive or to what we believe we &ust perceive#

As well as the idea of right or left, forward or backward, high or low, it can be sub-ectively

interpreted, so auditory and kinesthetic perceptions can provide personali3ed answers,

reasonable for our awareness.

"hat &akes us believe that the idea of big or s&all is real#


9/49

"hat &akes us believe that the i&age above represent a cube#

"hat will be the right definition of high or low#


10/49

%n fact, we are reali3ing that our brain decides to see between two possibilities, the one

that is &ore co&fortable. But when the brain can not easily decide between the two

possibilities, then, a further &ental process of control is established, that produces in our

brains, the atte&pt to solve the dile&&a.

"hen the perceptual syste& that passes through the brain conventions is not accepted by

our awareness, then, it is the brain itself that looks for a new interpretative way. %n that

instant it reali3es that it was tricked by itself, but still it does not understand that the origin

of the deception co&es fro& its awareness at that &o&ent, our awareness reali3es that

we ourselves are the creators of what we observe, and therefore, we can &anipulate our

perception in order to observe what we wish to see.

But in this context, we are not aware of creating, in that instant, what we are observing. %n

other words, our perception is not overwhel&ed by a change of the internal para&eters of

th brain that change the idea of reality, but change the virtual reality itself, then it will not

appear to us as we believe it is but as we would like it to be. The act of perception in its

transfor&ation is li&ited to an act of unconscious creation, often opposite to our wishes

but in accordance with what we expect that should exist. %f for exa&ple % think %& sick, but

% want to be healed, %ll be unknowingly ill. But if % a& conscious that % a& the creator of

virtuality, then, %ll feel healthy while beco&ing it.

The idea of forward and behind

The idea of the depth is expressed by the hu&an eye using different syste&s. epth is

pri&arily linked to a stroboscopic vision deter&ined by the presence of two instru&ents,

the eyeballs. 'aving two eyes and not one, allows us to develop in our brain so&e

auto&atic processes that give the idea of depth.


11/49

%n addition, our brain understands the idea of depth, using the gray tones."hen a three*

di&ensional ob-ect rotates around its vertical axis, so&e of its parts take position near and

far the observer, while rotating. %f you are lacking infor&ation about shades of gray, as in

exa&ple of the rotating dancer, or in the case of the rotating &ask, the gray tones can be

interpreted through a dual &echanis&2 our brain loses the ability to understand, by theperception of the &oving ob-ects, what it is watching.

http55www.recreoviral.co&5wp*content5uploads5896=59>51ifs*de*ilusiones*opticas*6.gif

%n the exa&ple of the rotating dancer, watching the &oving i&age and, especially the

central one, which co&pletely lacks of the shades of gray that would give the idea of depth

in the dancers body, then, our perception &ay let us think that she is rotating clockwise or

counterclockwise. )nly after warning the observer that he &ay have been &istaken, his

brain endeavor to see if it can perceive the dancer who spins the opposite way, according

to his first interpretation of the pheno&enon. "ith variables efforts, fro& sub-ect to sub-ect,

the dancer will spin clockwise or counterclockwise to us, according to our cerebral choice.

The &ind of the person who is observing this pheno&enon will choose his perceptual

&odel and &odify it at will, through a &echanis& that does not pass through a direct

perception, but through the knowledge that you can perceive the pheno&enon in a dual

&anner. The choice of the type of perception is equivalent to create that virtual reality, as

duality, in this universe, is built exclusively fro& our &inds.

But if we give &ore perceptive ele&ents at our brain disposal, as in the exa&ple of the

right dancer or the left, where with so&e extra white skillful features, we have highlighted

the contours of the ob-ect that &oves, our brain will have the &issing ite&s, in order tointerpret the pheno&enon of rotation without errors or uncertainties.


12/49

But not always we choose for hi&, and in cases where this does not happen, it is right the

brain to decide what is the best interpretation of reality, based on the awareness the

sub-ect hi&self has of of his own virtual reality .Thus, in the case of the rotating &ask, our

brain does not understand if it is &oving fro& right to left or fro& left to right

http55www.recreoviral.co&5wp*content5uploads5896=59>51ifs*de*ilusiones*opticas*=6.gif

0or other interesting exa&ples http55www.taringa.net5post5info56==>D56=*

%lusiones*opticas*(xplicadas.ht&l# http55www.taringa.net5buscar5#

qEilusionesFopticas

The color in motion

%f a body is in &otion, it will appear totally different fro& how it would appear if he stopped.

This ordinary concept that is related to physics of relativity, &akes us understand how the

color, the shape and the di&ensions of a body, are sub-ected to interpretive variations

depending on the &otion that the body itself shows. A galaxy &oving away fro& us will

appear red while a galaxy approaching will appear blue in color but it will be neither red

nor blue. %n this context, the idea that an ob-ect is brain connected with the idea of its

&ove&ent, through a colored i&age, appears absolutely relativistic. According to the

quantu& physics of non*local universe, there is no &ove&ent in this universe, since there

is neither space nor ti&e. /o, if our brain has the idea that a body is &oving away fro& us,

glowing, this light will turn to red as well as an a&bulance ripping towards us will issue a

very sharp sound, quite different fro& the one received by he who feels the a&bulance get

ting away fro& hi&.


13/49

The idea of the &odified sound or &odified light is apparently linked to the &odification of

the intrinsic wavelength of these pheno&ena. But as nothing &oves in this holographic

and virtual universe, then, the explanation beco&es &ore co&plex. "hen our brain

believes that an ob-ect &oves away fro& hi&, it will be perceived by a particular color and,

to it, a particular sound will be associated . %n addition, in our brain, the idea that this ob-ectchanges the distance that separates fro& us, will be perceived with variable di&ensions.

As a &atter of fact, in the Matrix where we are i&&ersed, nothing &oves but our brain

creates the idea of &ove&ent, creating interpretative syste&s of virtual reality, which,

through &ental &odels experienced since birth, will give us an idea of &ove&ent, actually

totally absent. %n other words, we can argue that we are the creators of the fil& we are

watching and perceiving. Therefore, we are not sub-ected to a reality but we are the

creators of the reality to which we believe we are sub-ected, for lack of awareness of it."hen two colors such as yellow and blue quickly alternate to our vision, we perceive a

green color having not the slightest idea that this color is not present.

http55www.teachingtreasures.co&.au5teaching*tools5art5art:*=5colour*&ix*discs.ht&

%t would be enough to obtain a headset connected to a co&puter that si&ulates the

&ove&ent of a sound source turning around the head in a clockwise direction . %f we bend

the head down we find that the sound see&s to revolve counterclockwise around our

head. Actually, the sound see&s to &ove because the sound source see&s to &ove, but

in fact, it is absolutely fir&.


14/49

The confirmation of quantum physics and modern cosmology

Guantu& physics and &odern cos&ology, provide so&e starting points in order to

verify easily the $(videonic $thought pattern.

%n the three axis &odel, we have proposed in the previous work, based on the vertical

energy axis, the space axis going fro& forward to backward and the ti&e axis that goes byleft to right, we can place the photons contained in the universe, taking into account that

they &ay have the si3e Max lanck calculates for the s&allest existing ob-ect . %f the

photon has actually that si3e, that is 69*;;c& in lenght, having a @te&poral thickness@ of

69*:: seconds, and ad&itting that one can place all of the photons of the universe next to

each other on the axis of the space and of course also on the ti&e axis, one &ight

calculate how &any photons there are on the space*ti&e plane, that is, in the whole

universe.Modern cos&ology provides an i&portant point of departure. The data provided fro& the

analysis of the background radiation of the universe would indicate that it is 6;.8H69I

years old. But one year is equivalent to ;6=;DIII seconds, that, &ultiplied by the age of

the universe, provide a value of :.;=H696> seconds.

This nu&ber, which is the age of the universe in seconds, if divided by lanck ti&e

&easure, gives us the exact nu&ber of the existing photons along the axis of ti&e.

/o we will have that =.;IH69*:: 5 :.;=H69*6> provide a result of H69D9 photons.

This is equivalent to the sa&e nu&ber of photons living either on the axis of space or on

the ti&e axis. "e can now calculate how long the universe is, knowing that each photon

has the lanck length. /o we -ust have to &ultiply the value of lanck length for this result

and getting a value of H69D9H6.D6DH69*;; E 68.I:H698> &eters.

Jow we -ust have to &ake so&e observations, the first of which is linked to the supposed

expansion of the universe speed. Mainstrea& science has not at all clear ideas on this

topic. /ince it has not yet decided whether the universe is speeding up or slowing down, in

what way and with what law it does it. %n this context, so&e theories assu&e that the

universe is expanding at the speed light, or rather the li&its of the universe would expand

at that rate but, inside, the universe would show a locally differentiated speed expansion.

/o&e latest observations have revealed the experi&ental fact that the universe, or rather

so&e parts of it, are accelerating. 0ro& our point of view, if we divide the universe length

for the total universe ti&e we get an interesting result .

Actually, 68.I:H698>5:.;88H696>H provides a value of 8,II=,;>9 k& per second.

This value represents an approxi&ation of the speed of light, which is 8II >D8 & 5 s,

&ultiplied by a factor of 69. To obtain a value equal to 69c, lets start fro& 6;.I8 years of


15/49

billiards, as the value of the ti&e regarding the duration of our universe.

All this basically &eans two things the first of which is that the value of the duration of the

universe appears, as a result of the &ost correct calculations, currently growing and

growing and the value of 6;.I8 years of billiards, we theoretically calculated for obtaining

a correct value of the speed of light, is included in the present experi&ental error,calculated by astrono&ers. )n the other hand, the use of the lanck length and of the

lanck ti&e as effective &easures of the photon, see& to provide a correct &easure&ent

of the si3e of the universe, by relating the astrophysics with the quantu& physics.

0urther&ore, the ratio between the length of the universe divided by the &easure of its

duration provides a value that represents a rate of about 69 ti&es the speed of the light.

This could have a clear physical &eaning. This value, in fact, &ight represent the average

speed at which the universe has being expanding fro& its beginning up to this &o&ent anaverage speed equal to 69 ti&es the speed of light. But what does the official science

state about this latest figure# Analy3ing the scientific works published in this area by

astrophysicists, we discover that there are different types of approaches leading to

different final values of speed as far as the expansion of the universe concerns. %n

particular, so&e authors clai& to have carried out the &ore precise &easure&ent of the

the universe speed expansion and that it currently is around D kilo&eters per second,

with a &axi&u& error of about one kilo&eter per second.

http55gaianews.it5scien3a*e*tecnologia5spa3io5ecco*la*piu*accurata*&isuradella*

velocita*di*espansione*delluniverso*di*se&pre*86=D.ht&lK.?d8aMLoar?

These authors see& to argue that these values represent a constant speed of the universe

and that it was also the one we could observe so&e &illion years ago. %n fact, the Big

Bang theory predicts that at the beginning, the universe expanded at an extre&ely high

speed , that at present, no one knows .

Therefore, affir&ing that the total average speed of the universe could have a value equal

to 69c,this does not see& to be a speech out of place. Continuing to suppose for a

&o&ent that there is a local space*ti&e, that is, ti&e rolls by, we could &ultiply the value of

the expansion rate of the universe, that is >:.; kilo&eters per second , for the duration of

the universe expressed in seconds, which is :.;886H696> obtaining a value in kilo&eters for

the length of the universe, equal to ;86.68:DH696> k& , that is ;,86H698: c&. A value not so

far fro& that calculated by us earlier, a&ounting to 68.I:H698> c&.

%n this strange -u&ble of nu&bers, it should be e&phasi3ed that the data obtained fro& the

proposed structure of a $(videonic! space, co&pared to the experi&ental data obtained

through &easure&ents of cos&ic para&eters, excluding the &easured data of the start,


16/49

represented by the value of the universe, would be &ore accurate because less sub-ected

to experi&ental &easure&ent errors. Therefore, it should be pointed out how the universe

is in fact a non*local reality, that is, absolutely fir&, where there is no space and ti&e if not

in the Max lanck &easures and talking about the expanding universe or the rate of the

expansion of the universe, would &ake no sense for quantu& physics. Therefore, all thesenu&bers &ake sense only in the &ental sense that the universe is dual and that there is a

past, a present and a future. )ne could &ore correctly say that the universe is expanding

at >:.; kilo&eters per second but that we have a wrong and sy&bolic perception of the

fact that, if the universe had to expand, it would appear us to expand to that speed. 0ro&

this point of view, these nu&bers are included in the totally static $(videonic! &odel, and

they can be used to &easure the universe, through the proposed &odel, as it virtually

would appear if it was not holographic.The nu&bers we obtain as regards to the physical quantities, length and ti&e either of the

subato&ic particles or of cos&ic &easure&ents we know, calculated by the $(videonic!

&odel, therefore, represent the i&age of virtual reality, that is substantially what we are

able to &easure but they do not represent the virtual reality, that is actually a si&ple three*

di&ensional hologra&. %n this interpretation, one &ust say that the universe has a certain

age because its age is the su& of the age of its photons2 then a universe of 69 photons will

have an age deter&ined by lanck ti&e &ultiplied by 69, so in the sa&e context, the

length it would show, would be equal to the lanck length &ultiplied by 69.

A further observation is given by the fact that, using the value of lanck ti&e within the

&easure of the duration of the universe, we have accurately calculated the si3e of the

universe itself, whose &easures appear to balance with the value of the speed of light.

(verything is once again a confir&ation that, within an!(videonic! interpretation, the

photon would have indieed the di&ensions calculated by lanck for the s&allest existing

ob-ect in this universe. )bviously, we &ust e&phasi3e that in space and ti&e, between a

photon and the other, there would be nothing because nothing would be &athe&atically

definable and therefore non*existent. But we shall see in a &o&ent that even this way of

seeing things is a virtual universe approxi&ation, that, we &ust re&e&ber once again, is

nonlocal. 0ro& this point of view, it &akes no sense speaking of photons scattered on a

ti&e line space, as it is still a dual concept, where there is a $before! and an $after!, a

$here $and $there!.

Nonlocal Universe

Jevertheless, there is another interesting data we have taken fro& the quantu& physics


17/49

calculations. Actually, physics have wondered what kind of life expectancy a photon would

have. (very subato&ic particle has in fact an average life properly calculated but

calculating the average life of a photon, one would expect that the rest &ass of a photon

is equal to 3ero.)n one side, &odern physics considers that the photon has no &ass, on

the other, so&e scientists have calculated that the &ass of the photon should be around69*=: kilos.

This value, due to the re&aining &ass of the photon, doesnt allow to calculate for to the

photon itself, an average life ti&e equal to 696 years, that, if co&pared to the current age

of the universe, would &ake us understand how the latter has still a long ti&e before

shutting down.

http55physicsworld.co&5cws5article5news5896;5-ul58:5what*is*the*lifeti&e*of*a* photon.

)n the other hand, scientists have calculated the approxi&ate total nu&ber of photons thatour universe contains and they have esti&ated a value of 69I. An approxi&ate value by

default, because it takes no account of the photons that &ake up the s&all a&ount of

&atter within the universe itself.

The esti&ated nu&ber of photons carried out by us, provides that on the space*ti&e plane

there are H69D9 photons. his &eans that there would be 8√ 8H69;9 photons to be arranged

on the axis of the space and as &any to be arranged on the ti&e axis, not considering the

axis of energy see footnote 6N. This suggests that even on the axis of the potential energy,the nu&ber of photons was the sa&e. In this context, in the te&poral space octant,

dealing with the existence of our part of the universe, i&agined as a cube or a cuboid with

a square base the space * ti&e planeN, the nu&ber of total photons would be given by

8√ 8N;69I9, in accordance with the approxi&ate assess&ents of the classical science see

footnote 6N.

%t should be stressed that our value concerning the nu&ber of photons, is in balance either

with the &easure&ent of the length, or with the &easure of the lanck ti&e, or with the

actual si3e of the universe. The sa&e value, calculated by scientists, does not find any

confir&ation by the i&ple&ented experi&ental observations, based on the Big Bang theory

and on the clai& that the background radiation of the universe has a definite age, plausibly

esti&ated inaccurately. %n fact, since there was not a Big Bang, the pertaining hypothesis

on the nu&ber of photons see&s rather probably wrong.

http55www.quora.co&5'ow*&any*photons*are*there*in*the*universehttp55www.cnet.co&5news5universes*&issing*photons*baffle*scientists5 KO


18/49

As the virtual universe expansion rate is equal to a value of >:.; kilo&eters per second, if

we &ultiply this value by the ti&e of the universe in seconds, equal to :.;88H696>, we get a

value equal to ;.86H698: c&, to be related to the value we previously obtained, that is

68.I:H698> c&. The first of the two values should be evidently considered at fault because,

in the vision of the Big Bang cos&ogony, the universe did not expand at the sa&e speedbut the first &o&ents were characteri3ed by a far &ore high expansion rate. Today,

however, so&e cos&ologists clai& that the universe would be in acceleration. %t is not

possibile to confir& this type of data because the observations carried out by these

scientists only look at a particular area of the universe and the data relating to the

expulsion speed of the galaxies, cannot be attributed to all the galaxies in the universe.

The &odel we proposed, reaches absolute conclusions,&easures start with precise

nu&bers, universal constants, and they are barely related to experi&ental errors.%n fact, asserting that the universe is a fractal hologra&, three*di&ensional, non*local,

expressible by a sy&bolic point of view, with archetypal structures, suppose to i&agine a

universe in which the idea of &ove&ent, the idea of ti&e linked to space, have no sense,

if not in order to represent a &easure of our perception.

The true nature of the fractal

At this point, if we had a picture of the fractal universe with our interpretation, we would

see it evolving in space and ti&e with the nu&erical characteristics expressed by the

equation 6;,=nE 6;>58HPQN, where nu&ber 6;> is the inverse of the constant dealing with

the subtle structure of the universe, the nu&ber 6;.= represents the nature of the

quanti3ation of the universe, according to the $(videonic! pattern, n is an integer quantu&

nu&ber ranging fro& 3ero to the infinity, nu&ber 8 represents the constant duality of the

universe, the golden section, and finally i π represents the two nu&bers on which the

whole geo&etry of our interpretation is based. "anting to assign an i&age to the evolution

of the universe in space and in ti&e, the value of the golden section is the expansion along

the space axis, while i π is the expansion along the ti&e axis, circular in the (videonic

universe .


19/49

)n can understand now, as this special for&, perfectly fits in the idea of the fractal

holographic universe, as we perceive it as far as for& and substance concern. This spiral,

which depends on the golden section, is present in all the &anifestations of universal for&.

0ro& galaxies to shells, fro& the &olecular structure to the position of the che&ical

ele&ents, along the periodic table of ele&ents. Moreover, the idea of the spiral shape

unconsciously, but sy&bolically represented as the consciential path the hu&an being is

fulfilling.


20/49

That hu&an consciousness can be represented through the &easure&ent of awareness,

as the universe is &athe&atically represented, though this should not be surprising

because, as the universe is non*local and as space and ti&e are not existing, it is the

representation of an ob-ect whose parts are identical to the sa&e ob-ect, because of its

fractal nature.

Therefore, we would be the universe itself, we

would represent a fractal unit, where our path of

awareness in the alche&ical labyrinth, is nothing

&ore than the expression of the expansion of thevirtual universe .

The evideonic universe and the fractal

The (videonic universe is represented by a cross

consisting of D axle shafts that divide virtuality into

octants, of which, we would inhabit the only one

characteri3ed by the green axle shafts for energy,the red axle shafts for space, the blue axle shafts

for ti&e.


21/49

/uch a structure would be repeated endlessly in every octant, providing a very co&plex

reticulated fra&ework , such as the following one.

%n this interpretation, the universe would be represented by a huge photon &ade up of

billions of other photons .

This virtual photonic structure would uninterruptedly &anifest either in the for& of

photons or in the for& of anti photons, giving rise to the virtuality that we believe to

observe.


22/49

%n particular, the infinite variations of the axis of energy, dealing with all the virtual photons,

would shape this virtuality and consequently provide the final i&age of the current world.

/uch a &atrix virtual photon, which would build itself through the variations of the vertical

axis length of the potential energies, connected with the fractal individual units the

individual virtual photonsN, would give rise to the universe we perceive. %n this universe we

would be unwitting &anipulators of the axis of energy, that is, the creators of what we

perceive.

"e &ust re&e&ber that every virtual photon would be inti&ately linked to all the other

photons, either on his existential level or on the upper levels. %n other words, the entire

universe, the &anifestation of a single photon, would be affected all the ti&e by the

existence of all the other photons, as parts of its hologra&.

0ro& an entropic point of view, photons are the representation of an infor&ation and

therefore, it is correct to assu&e that each photon has within itself all the infor&ation of the

whole universe.

%n theory, all this would be possible if a photon behaved like 699,999 photons all put

together that, in turn, act like all the photons of the universe, that is, as the only generator

of photons throughout the fractal syste&. "ell, this is exactly what see&s to be

happening.

A recent experi&ent in quantu& physics has proven how a single photon behaves exactly

like the group of 699,999 photons to who& it belongs .

There wouldnt be any kind of behavioral and physical separation between a photon

co&ponent of a set of photons and the whole, which would beco&e a single ob-ect.

https55www.newscientist.co&5article5&g898>:*999*sea*of*photons*&ade*to*actas*


23/49

one*super*photon5

http55cos&o&etry.net5;d*hologra&,*photon*field,*you*are*everywhere

Therefore the universe would be nothing but a single block of photons closely

bound together in a matrix of points of light that appear to our senses only when wewant them to do so.

)nce again it is clear that we are the creators of the apparent virtuality.

(ach of us &odel the sa&e portion of virtuality that is sub-ective, though. %f two people

observe a photon, it &ay appear blue to the first observer and red to the second one, since

each of the& acts differently on the axis of the energies connected to photon in question.

The movement and the matrix

But if there is no possibility of &oving in a non*local universe, how it is possible that we

perceive the &ove&ent of our body for exa&ple#

%n fact, in this holographic vision of the universe, all the &atrix of photons would be fixed

in a single block of photons, with the shape of a photon and every single photon of this

block would be a carrier of infor&ation, a pixel that can be illu&inated or can switch off on

a three*di&ensional screen, which would construct the three*di&ensional i&ages of our

own body.


24/49

"e therefore would not &ove in this &atrix of points of light it would be instead our

infor&ation to &ove, to turn off the photons behind us and to turn on the photons placed in

front of us, thus giving rise to the idea of &ove&ent, neither &ore nor less than observing

a written &ade of R( lights that turn on and off in rapid succession, giving the false idea

that the writing is &oving.


25/49

The entire universe would be fixed &aybe the idea of &ove&ent would be infor&ation, as

a sprite of co&puter that &oves within the C4 Central rocessing 4nitN of the co&puter

itself.

The &ove&ent would then be produced only by our Consciousness which illu&inates and

switches off parts of its creation, where each photon is aware of having the sa&echaracteristics, and then to be, as the entire photonic universe. Jow a lot of questions

have an answer .

http55www.a&a3on.it5"hy*/ingle*hoton*Theory*The5dp56:;D8=;8S

%n fact, so&e authors are recently beginning to ask their readers the idea of a world &ade

of a single photon. /uch a photon would not be $conscious!, as such, but it would only be

the creation of consciousness, which would be the real engine of the whole universe .

0urther&ore this photon, called virtual, would be once again the su& of two aspects of the

universe, it would represent the being and the anti* being, the &atter and the anti*&atter ,

the energy and the anti* energy.

%n the end, we can conclude that the whole universe, the whole of creation of

Consciousness is si&ply a single virtual photon.


26/49

!ymbolic meaning of the total fractal

The cubic &atrix of photons is a three di&ensional representation of our universal octant,

but how can we i&agine this fractal , by extending our analysis to the other octants, either

of this level or of the other quanti3ed levels that &ake up the evideonic universe#

The fractal is like a Lussian doll and, bearing in &ind that the levels that procede us areplaced inside a conical structure at the top of which there is the a nearly non *separation

Brah&a, the prevailing &ind and generative of duality, that in the (videonic world is

represented by soul and spiritN2 then we &ust suppose to place in an diagra&, expanded

on the axis of energy as &any octant groups, as the existing levels of energy .

These groups of octants, which actually inhabit one inside the other, as the shells of the

electronic quanti3ation of ato&ic orbitals, can be drawn as follows

(ach cube represents a photon within which there are billions of cubic structures

representing other s&aller octants, each of which can be represented as a single photon

&ade in turn of other virtual photonsN. The (videon, in space can also be represented as

8 tetrahedra and it is easy to note that, even in this geo&etric representation, you always

end by getting a cubic fractal structure /ee footnote ;N.


27/49

%n a further sy&bolic geo&etric representation, you can describe different energy levels, as

if they were placed on different heights of a conical structure, which shows at its peak a

nearly non *separation between soul, &ind and spirit.

This separation is &ore and &ore highlighted going down the layer below untill a co&plete

separation at the base of the cone our existential levelN

%n this ; si&ulation, we showed the cone section with blue,red and green balls indicating

the location and thus, the separation between the&. )ne &ay notice as the &ental part,

which is responsible for the changes along the axis of energies, always re&ains in the


28/49

center, exactly located above the axis of the energy, while soul and spirit are drifting away

each other, living on a co&&on circu&ference that is &ore and &ore expanding. 'alfway

the current state of hu&anityN the separation of soul and spirit would be &axi&u&.

0ro& this point on, begins the process of reconciliation in order to attain a new aware

fusion that, this ti&e, would go through the experience.!o you do not go back to the !ource, at the top, but you regain the fusion of the

consciences of the triad, through a reverse route, though, it is a speculating fusion.

The descending process is representative of the acquisition of knowledge as well as is the

process of approach between the blue and the red sphere, along the space ti&e.

The existing analogy between this &odel and the conception of &odern cos&ology cant

escape for& the careful reader .This analogy tends to identify the variables of space and

ti&e into a unique fusion of space*ti&e (insteins field of relativityN, while the energyre&ains a &agnitude apart to date, it does not exist a theory able to place the energy and

space * ti&e in a single &athe&atical coherent vision, unless you use the (videonic vision

we suggested in the previous works N .

0or this reason, we note that the speed can be geo&etrically described in the (videonic,

world such as a circle, that soul and spirit pass through on the space * ti&e in order to

reunify.

The alchemical vision

Thus, the latonic idea of the androgyne the Ada&aN consists of a being half &ale and

fe&ale, half -oined to the back, with four ar&s and four legs, which is separated by the

envious and &anipulating Creator, takes in this context, a &ore &odern interpretation.

%n the Beginning, soul and spirit are connected together and they will be connected even at

the (nd of their -ourney of initiation the Alche&ic RabyrinthN, where the door of entry and

exit, are the sa&e door.


29/49

But the two states the initial and the final, are not identical since at the beginning, the

Conscience is not aware of itself, while in the (nd it beco&es so because its parts

beco&e aware.

At the Beginning, soul and spirit, &asculine and fe&inine, the dual in the &ost general

sense, are connected between the& fro& behind, in order to signify that the one is not

aware of the other, but at the (nd of the circular path which leads the& towards the exit of the alche&ical &a3e, they &eet in front of each other.

Therefore, this new union is conscious. %n this si&ple chart the &ind constantly re&ains at

the center of the circle of existence.

The concept expressed in the previous works, in which we e&phasi3ed that, fro& the

entropic point of view, the Beginning and the (nd, see& to have the sa&e entropy in the

total a&ount of the universal energy. %n fact, in this se&i*holographic universe, it has

increased up to a &axi&u& value of 3ero, starting fro& the value of &inus infinity. /ee(videon ;, in particularN.

These pictures and graphics proposed so far, in addition to having a geo&etric and

physical value, draw attention to &uch older i&ages, archetipally built by who has

preceded us on the virtual ti&e line.


30/49

%n this representation, for exa&ple, the 8 triangles that also represent soul with the tip

downwards and spirit, with the tip upwards .They are archetypically one blue and the

other one red, they also si&ulate the two conic sections as we have shown in previous

i&ages.

The fe&ale is on the right the right lobeN and the &ale is on the left left lobeN.The snake

is the representation of the Mind green, in the centerN.

The tree is the path of life and the nu&ber of stars and planets sy&boli3e the > quanti3ed

energy levels of the universe, placed to the right height, as reported in our previous work

titled $(videon 8.!

These correlations are possible only because we are the creators of the universe and

creating unwitting drawings that represent it, we define &odern physics, without knowing

it.

The new age &akes us believe that the only possible path of awareness is to go back, that

is, once arrived at the widest point of separation, which corresponds to the widestcircu&ference of the double cone, you should ascend and return to the )ne. %n that


31/49

context, there would be no chance to descend &ore, in order to bring together the spheres

of the triad.

As a &atter of fact, it should be e&phasi3ed that, this second part of the path, is a part that

we fulfill here, in this plane of existence, and this requires that there is no need to

describe the process of reunification of the red ball with the blue one through afurther descent from the existential level that we now occupy.

Bearing in &ind that we &ight graph in full even the anti * photonic part with energy of

opposite * sign, on the vertical axis, then, our universe takes the si3e of a double cone, this

ti&e in an hourglass shape, where the botto& would be occupied by the world of &atter

and the upper by anti&atter.

%n this representation, si&pler and direct, archetypally sy&bolic, though geo&etrically

reasonable, well be looking at this double cone.

Brah&a would be placed at the center of the double cone, beneath hi& the rising entropy

and above the descending entropy.

The sy&bolic and archetypal analogy cannot escape us it deals either with the

construction in antes ivine Co&edy, or with the aradise position the central center


32/49

of our hourglass, 'ell and urgatory, the 8 sy&&etrically opposite cones.

%n fact, it is well*known a&ong esotericists, that the work of the poet can be interpreted by

a gnostic key.

Actually ante, according to our interpretation, would si&ply had inner visions, in which his

consciential part, would provide hi& archetypal i&ages of an (videonic universe, which,interpreted by a &an of the fourteenth*century, would give rise to visions, which alche&ists

designers in later ti&es, would en-oy to reinterpret .

Therefore, the gnosis would be within us, and there would be no need either of priests,

channelers or of gods, either de&ons or aliens fro& which to draw, as teachers of truth, in

order to have the infor&ation and get the keys of truth .

http55www.anticorpi.info5896659:5la*divina*co&&edia*e*la*grande*opera.ht&lhttp55la&isticadellani&a.blogspot.it5896:5965il*segreto*di*dante*e*le*quattrochiavi.

't&l

The ivine Co&edy, as you can see fro& the &ost varied for&s of expression of this

fractal universe, is in all things that we observe, as in a photograph of the fa&ous butterfly*

shaped galaxy, where two -ets of energy, placed at 69 degrees to each other, &i&ic


33/49

perfectly the double cone of the (videonic universe .

http55www.eldia.co&5infor&acion*general5captan*i&agen*de*&ariposa*interestelar*

>IDD

"rchetypal world of the #ewish tradition

%f the universe is a fractal ob-ect and if we we are the unwitting creators, we &ust find

traces of it in the descriptions that our ancient ancestors left in their respective cultures.


34/49

Thus, on one hand, in the (gyptian Masonic tradition The Book of the ead of ThothN, on

the other, in the northern (uropean tradition the &yth of )dinN and in the %ndian tradition

the %ndus ?alley civili3ationN and even in the Tibetan legend of creation through the study

of The Loo&s of 3ian, conducted by Blavat3kyN, there are interesting descriptions of

such a holographic world, even the ewish tradition is not less so, as it gives the best of itself, through ancient texts. %n the first and oldest ewish texts prior to the +abbalah, to the

1e&atria and the Tal&ud, we have the /eder UetsirV, an ancient text that dates back to

the ti&e of his father Abraha& or to so&e researchers, to an unspecified period between

the third and sixth century BC. /uch an ancient text scientifically describes the universe

and its characteristics. There are basically three versions that differ fro& each other for the

length of the text but basically the content re&ains the sa&e. )ne of the scholars who

&ost thoroughly studied this ancient text in %taly was Mario incherle who translated fro&'ebrew to %talian. %n &ore current ti&es this text has been studied by Carlo /uares

http55www.psyche.co&5psyche5biblio.ht&lN The in*depth study of this author conducted to

understand the scientific nature of the ancient text that describes the universe as follows

“Thus everybody lives inside an enclosed and bounded cube, that constitutes an inner

space, where he himself is stuck. Suares, SY, p.87 “

%n this ancient text, the analysis &ade of this tube, is carried on by a series of graphs that

the author skilfully proposes in his studies .

%n these two graphs, you can see the strong si&ilarities with the structure of the (videon .

%n particular, the axis of the experience that is placed ahead and behind the hu&an being,

sy&boli3es the &aking, the &ove&ent in space, to &ove towards or retreat into

the&selves.


35/49

The axis of existence, vertically placed, is the axis of the energy in (videon, as without

energy, the three*di&ensional hologra& would not exist and the Manifestation of virtuality

would not exist.

%t will be noted as the lowest aspect of this axis is defined the self, that in the (videonicsyste& corresponds to an introverted personality, in the kinestethetic language, while the

opposite is obviously connected to extroversion high value of energyN.

As you can see fro& the chart, on the right of the observer, the ti&e axis flowing in the

direction shown by an arrow, represents life, that is, in the virtual, the running of it in ti&e.

%t will be noted as this flowing, however, sets the past to the right of the sub-ect and the

future to the left of hi&, contrary to how is placed in (videon. he fact that, for the /efer

UetsirV, the arrow of ti&e is opposite to that of (videon should not take us by surprise.%t will be stressed that the ewish culture places &an of the present, tended to return its

glorious past to the reconstruction of the 'eavenly erusale&, which lies in the pastN.

Jot by chance, graphically speaking, the ewish culture &akes use of a writing that, as

the Arabian one, &oves fro& right to left, on the contrary of the %ndo*(uropean writing who

sees the &an pro-ected into the future .

The ewish people, in &yth, are essentially linked to the figure of the 1od who sees his

people the chosen one a&ong all.

The ewish people are the e&anation of 1od that as we have described in other works

1enesis, (d . /pa3io %nteriore, Lo&e, 896;N, they are purely sexists and based on the

exaltation of the spiritual part of the self, unable to evolve a 1od and a people that refuse

the future, the experience of life that they fear, unable to accept the fe&ale part of

the&selves as they are afraid of being sub-ected to the fe&inine side.

A perfect copy of the alien character that gives rise to the &yth or eowah or the Angel of

the Jew Age the first &anifests itself in the &anner of a false god but a true alien and the

second shows hi&self as a false good 1od, &anipulator, defender of the hu&anity but a

true liar, a real sneaky &anipulator .

$osmology within %videon

That space * i&e is also described by the hori3ontal plane is evident fro& its description in

the ancient text, which places the four cardinal points to the extre&es of the appropriate

axes .


36/49

/uares, try to relate the 'ebrew letters of the alphabet with the position of the planets,

inside the orientation of the cube axes

http55www.psyche.co&5psyche5cube5cube


37/49

$orrelations between planets and &ebrew letters according to various authors

)n &any occasions we were asked to express an opinion on the scientific validity of the

'oroscope. As we have pointed out in other works, in the Mith, all is written and

described and therefore also the (videonic nature of the Cos&os. %t should also be

stressed that, as the universe, is a fractal, it only consists of arrays of photons, we can

assert, without danger of being contradicted by anyone, that in any ob-ect we observe, the

whole cos&os exists. Therefore, when we observe an aspect of the Manifestation, actually,

through it, we are observing ourselves. %n whatever &anifestation there are the pre&ises

for understanding the "holeness.

Jevertheless, there are those who see the universe through the &anipulation of Modern

hysics, those others through the divination with the Tarot and who uses the position of

the asters. There is no difference between the different approaches because in everything

there is all. %t should be e&phasi3ed that the "hole is within us and not outside. %n other

words, we we are not studying the outside through an observation of nature, but we are

are trying to re&e&ber how we created it. Jature is therefore within us before being

outside and the outside is only a reflection of what we have inside.

%n that context, the quantu& physicist who uses his for&ulas believes to &ake an

experi&ent that will de&onstrate hi& so&ething about the structure of &atter, whereas he


38/49

si&ply creates, through experi&ent, what he is unconsciously creating. The nature of

creation will depend only by the knowledge of the sub-ect who is unwittingly creating. /o, if

% want to see how the world is &ade, by reading the coffee grounds, % can do it and % will

have the opportunity to achieve the sa&e results of the quantu& physicist who sees the

world by &anipulating its for&ulas. "ho is attracted by so&e pheno&ena as the&ove&ent of the planets, will study those and in the& he will see the sa&e things that an

oriental sha&an could understand throwing a fist of shells on the beach. Therefore,

various aspects of this virtuality &ust be underlined.

6. 'hysicists are no less precise than shamans

8. "strology is not less useful of "stronomy to understand the universe neither

less valid.;. The "strology as "stronomy depends on the structure of %videon and it not the

opposite as in %videon there is the description of all.

/tudying the stars to say what will happen to&orrow, then, is a big nonsense, while the

correct attitude would be to observe the &ove&ent of the stars, archetipally understand

what position they occupy in the context of the evideonic cube and transfor& positions and

&ove&ents in sy&bolic ideal &eanings, as the archetypes are geo&etric operators.

As well as graphology assu&es a fitting &eaning within the (videon or co&&unication of

JR, in the sa&e way, the interpretation of the &ove&ent of the stars can be a fractally

usable tool .

%n fact, observing everything, as the &ove&ent of the stars, we are unknowingly observing

our own creation, and since we are what we do, we are actually observing ourselves.

Therefore, it is clear that, if our observation is conducted with awareness of it,it will give us

infor&ation about ourselves that we seek, where the divination would &erely be to look at

the &irror.

The evideonic nature of the Natal $hart

%n order to understand how it is possible to rework a valid, generic, real structure of the

natal chart,we are going to apply the construction of the horoscope to the spaces of the

(videon, with the sa&e strategy we used in our other previous work, in the re*analysis of

the (nneagra&, crippled by the little awareness that the users of this syste& show in its

use, in various fields, fro& JR to cut*and*dried sychology .

'ttp55www.corrado&alanga.co&5co&a5docu&ents5enneagra&&aAlla/barra.pdfN.


39/49

%n using this approach, we &ust first look at how the virtual universe around our planet is

done, or how it would appear if we believed that space and ti&e exist.

The (arth rotates around the /un and the Moon around the (arth rotates. The different

planets revolve around the sun.

The whole solar syste& &oves through the 1alaxy the space around us, what couldso&ehow pseudo*affect our birth chartN.

The position of the constellations, in co&parison to our position, varies over ti&e.

0urther&ore, one of the possible reference points of the whole syste& can be given by the

direction that a hypothetical (arth*/un axis has, in co&parison to the constellations. %n

fact, a person born under a certain sign if, by convention, in that instant, the prolongation

of the axle (arth*/un, going beyond the /un, strikes a particular constellation.

%t should be noted that the (videonic archetypal force acts on the construction of thehoroscope. %n fact, the constellations are twelve, the syste& used is sexagesi&al and all

the nu&bers of the &ethod are angles everything as in the (videon.

"e can finally put the whole /un (arth Moon syste& in the context of the 1alaxy going


40/49

to see where the Constellations are

%t see&s obvious that all the constellations inhabit a plan that is the spaceti&e inside the

cube of the (videon. %t is therefore not correct to place the planets and stars outside this

plane as proceeded /uarWs, in his interpretation of the /efer UetsirV. Jow we &ust direct

the axes of the (videon to this plane and this can be properly carried out using so&e of

the observations contained in the archetypal solar syste&. %n this context, the position of

the Moon and the /un, represent the dual extre&es of the &ale and the fe&ale energy,

the white and the black, the &ale and fe&ale, the positive and the negative one inverted

according to the culture fro& which these infor&ation originatesN .

/i&ilarly to what supported in part by /uarWs, we can put the sun at the top, on the axis of

the energies and the Moon at the botto& on the sa&e axis.

%n this context, we also carried out a second geo&etric operation

we assigned the color white to the /un and black to the Moon. archetypal &eaning of

day and night, of /hiva and ?ishnu, etc.N.

This see&s archetipally i&portant, because the different signs of the 3odiac,

corresponding to the respective twelve constellations, were related to colors.

%n the three*di&ensional paper color in fact, if we set the white on top and black at the

botto&, we get a color space version, either a cubical version or a spherical one,

extre&ely useful in order to relate and ad-ust the (videon as a position within our 1alaxy.


41/49

%n the cubic version, white and black are placed in two opposite corners, in the cylindrical

or spherical vision, they are positioned at the opposite poles.

)nce directed the axle of the energies, we &ust assign colors to the different 3odiac signs

that will occupy the space*plane of the (videonic cube, which corresponds to the 3odiacal

belt plane see figures aboveN.

?arious @experts@ of the 3odiac, have ventured into the atte&pt of a correlational &ethod

between colors and 3odiac constellations. "hat can be noted in the literature, is that there

are &any different versions often very dissi&ilar to each other.

Reaning on the Myth is definitely i&portant at this stage of our observations, in order to

per&anently orient the cross of the (videon in the galactic space.

Thus, taking four 3odiacal signs placed crosswise between the& as the Aquariu& Air

signN and the Rion fire signN, opposed to each other, you can assign two basic colors,that

are blue AquariusN and yellow RionN.

Most astrologers use this quite archetypal sy&bolis&, which we consider apt either using

the idea that Aquarius is an air sign, or that one of the land&arks of the Rion is the sun.

The blue and the yellow are the representation of the ti&e axis.

)n the axis placed at ninety degrees, fall the Taurus and on the opposite side, the

/corpio. )n the basis of spectroscopy in the visible, Taurus rlates to color red, while

/corpio relates to cyan.

%n this context it should be noted as archetypally, Taurus is always assigned to the red

color fro& which we always try to @ escape. @

"e will see better the &eaning of the word @to run away@ in this context . All the other

3odiac signs will be set accordingly on the space*ti&e plane and everyone will have the

color they &ust possess, cli&bing the chro&atic scale, according to its own wavelengths.


42/49

"hat we report to the left, is the color chart of the 3odiac signs that &ore draws near to

our correlation, even if so&e tones are not properly correct, as it is shown on the right ,

where /corpio is associated with pure cyan, without tonality of green, as erroneously

appears to the left *

"e can definitely direct now the (videon in the world of the astrology.


43/49

!ymbolic interpretation of Natal $harts

The Myth and astrology have in co&&on the archetype that originates both. 0or this

reason, it is possible to correlate the one to the other aspect of the virtual reality, notbecause one depends on the other, but because they are two expressions of the sa&e

identical virtuality Loberto /icuteri, Astrology and Myth, /y&bols and Myth of the 3odiac

in epth sychology , (d .Astrolabio, 6I>, Lo&eN.

"e discover that in &yth, the cross of the (videon, represents the @fixed cross@ Aquariu&

Reo and /corpio Taurus http55www.scien3e*astratte.it5acquario.ht&l N.

/o it is, either in the Myth or in the (videon, because the &yth is included in the (videon

and the latter could never give different interpretations.

/o if we now try to sketch an interpretation of the character of Aquarius, for exa&ple, is

see&s to be bound to the ti&e axis, having no vector co&ponents along the space axis.

This &akes Aquarius, a sign who does not live in the present space, it is not in the world if

not in ti&e. Moreover, as all the signs around the center of gravity , which is on the one


44/49


45/49

intended as proxi&ity of our planet to the /un or to the Moon at birth the natal chartN and

the planet luto position that does not reside on the orbital plane of the other planets and

which therefore rises and falls always occupying the space*ti&e plane in place but

gradually different fro& that of all the other planets, as it is shown in this clear i&age.

Mercury also does not behave @well@ and can influence the energetic aspect, leaving the

space*ti&e plane, though in an irrelevant way.

http55www.astrogeo.va.it5astrono&5pianeti5&ercurio5transit.ht&.


46/49

%n addition, to co&plicate &atters, one should consider which actually is considered but

often in a &isleading wayN, the position of the single planets around the four space*

te&poral quadrants.

Thus, it is not the task of this article to deter&ine all the para&eters of the natal chart,

however, we -ust have to show how the archetype of the 3odiac is actually well included in(videon. The conclusions on this issue lead us to argue that, although the birth chart has a

certain sy&bolic archetypal validity, as a &irror of our being pro-ected to the outside, it is

nearly always &isinterpreted, since the one who delights in practicing astrology has no

awareness of his own nature, consequenlty i&agine if he &ight deter&ine that of the other

parts of hi&self that go to his astrological consultation.

$onclusions%n our previous works, and in particular in (videon 6 and 8, the (nneagra& to the stand

and in this we reconstructed the true archetypal &eaning of the (nneagra&, of the

horoscope, the biorhyth&, the graphology, the &eta*co&&unication, the interpretation of

drea&s, concluding, on the one hand, that all this has a &uch &ore i&portant effect ever

ad&itted by science, which is a universal archetypal validity. )n the other hand, we also

have outlined how the users of these techniques not using an (videonic approach, &ay

co&e to conclusions quite far fro& the description of virtuality.

The &atrix of points of light, expressed as the cube of the virtual constitutes a universal

key for the interpretation of any pheno&enon you want to investigate and probably it

represents the &ost &odern interpretation of the "hole, intended as our creation.

%n order to finish this series of articles, which for years you have the goodness to read, %

wish to close with an exhortation. Uou dont need to ask others who you are.

"hether &agicians, de&ons, gods, descended or ascended &asters, doctors and

quantu& physicists.

"ithin you, you know it. "sk yourselves and not invest others of responsibilities they

cannot have.

(iference and footonotes

6. C. Malanga, (videon, (d /pa3io %nteriore, Lo&e 896:

8. C. Malanga, (videon 8, (d. /pa3io %nteriore, Lo&e 896=

;. C. Malanga, (videon ;, next publication


47/49

:. https55alienabductionsblog.files.wordpress.co&5896:59;5evideon*;*ita.pdf

=. Malanga, (nneagra& to the stand.

D. https55alienabductionsblog.files.wordpress.co&5896:59>5enneagra&&a*alla*sbarra.pdf

>. 0ootnote 6N The nu&ber calculated by us that expresses the totality of the photons

equal to x 69D9.

%t &ust be understood as the total nu&ber of photons residents on the plane in a te&poral

space of a universe, in which space and ti&e exist. %n this context, such photons are all

photons of a cube that represents our universal octant, regardless of their energy.

Therefore, in a evideonic context, these photons should be placed in a row on the axis of

space and on the axis of ti&e, as only the axes of space and ti&e exist and connected to

each other by the value of the bond of the speed of light. %n a three*di&ensional context,

where the axes of the (videon si&ulate the three di&ensions of the fractal, it is understoodas such a nu&ber of photons establishes that around 69;9photons are connected on every

axle of space, ti&e and energy.

%n other words, these photons are arranged along a cubic three*di&ensional figure,

provided that the third axle of the energy has non void value. %f such a value is void, all

the photons exist only in the space te&poral plane.

Therefore, the difference in the 8 approaches that brings to 8 different &easures of the

total quantity of photons of the universe, depends on virtually considering all the photons

without vertical axle of energy, that is, without apparent &ass, or on considering the&

non)virtual, that is, endowed with &ass or anti &ass. %n this case they also &anifest on

the evideonic axle of the potential energy.

. 0ootnote 8N The photonic fractal &ade of photons has an interesting nu&erical

characteristic. %f in fact we apply to the universe the nu&bers expressed by the appropriate

carriers considered for the (videon, we can i&&ediately &ake 8 considerations. 0irst, the

su& of the ; vectors of the axis of energy &ultiplied or divided by any nu&ber will always

provide a nu&ber whose su& of digits that co&prise it, will always give, as a final result,

nu&ber I. for exa&ple ;ID x 6= E =I:9, where = F I F : F 9 E 6, where 6 F E IN.

Le&e&bering that these nu&bers are representative of vectors, they can never overco&e

the value of I for the &aintenance of the potential energies but, above all, a nu&ber

superior to I cannot be gotten since, in the (videonic geo&etry , the nu&bers are only I .

Thus, reducing or expanding the &easures of the photon, it will always give a photon that

has the sa&e energy of the starting photon. This &eans that this fractal always consists of

identical bricks either in for& or in nu&erical values which, we re&e&ber once again, are

the expression of the geo&etric vectors. %f the photon of quantu& physics can be


48/49

expressed as a wave, the potential of this wave is given by the wavefor& and not by its

breadth, according to the calculations expressed by Boh&. All this &eans that a single

photon or all the photons of the universe have the sa&e energy since they are basically

one thing.

A second observation is related to the fact that this feature that is exclusive only of nu&ber I, of all the nu&bers of the universe, is also linked to (videonic nu&bers characteri3ing

the space and the ti&e axis, if considered together. %t should be recalled that the ti&e axis

has nu&erical values, whose su& of digits is always worth ;, while for the axis space, this

value is always D. The ; of ti&e and the D of space &ust work together in the fractal, in

order to have the sa&e geo&etry of the axis of the energies.

This &eans that there is not space and ti&e, but the space*ti&e that is in &athe&atical

balance with the axis of the energies and everything appears in agree&ent with the findingthat although scientists have been trying for a long ti&e, in order to connect space, ti&e

and energy with a unique version of things, no theory to date is able to unify carriers

questions, unless you consider the energy released by a space*ti&e field where the 8

&agnitudes of ti&e and space are inti&ately connected to each other, so that the phycists

say they are a @field@ .http 55youtu.be5/tw;6DT9nGg.

/o if you add up the values of the digits of the nu&bers corresponding to the axis of

energy for exa&ple, the ;, D and IN you obtain the sa&e value that we obtain by su&&ing

the other values for ti&e and space, for exa&ple =, 8, , 6, >, and :N whose respective

su&s always give I. This also &eans that energy and space*ti&e develop into the

universal fractal with the sa&e geo&etric properties where space cannot be released by

ti&e but it is one with it.

I. 0ootnote ;N. Many serious astrono&ers are showing that the @sky@ * @e&pty space@ X

doesnt &eet this principle at all, but it would have a cellular structure that would be

repeated with si&ilar shapes on all scales, fro& s&all to large ones. As % report in $Baby

/un Levelation!, in studies of the "MA probe data, the @e&pty@ has a dodecahedral

geo&etry, defined by '. oincare The vertexes of the (videon are 68N. %t is the 0rench

school who has tried on several occasions, to de&onstrate the substantial difference

between (insteins 1eneral Lelativity and that of '. oincarY, recogni3ing the crucial role

of the ether. A structure like this &akes the @e&pty@ space a hall of mirrors that reflect

i&ages of endless of each celestial body. %f so, the solar &agnetosphere or heliosphere, is

a real latonic cave and not in the usual sense. %t is a &agnetic bubble with a cell

structure or a fractal structure, that is, with @walls@ scattered in the space*ti&e vacuu&,

on which the @shadows@ are pro-ecting, as lato and 1iordano Bruno said, the &any


49/49

possible i&ages of the sa&e heavenly body. The real solar system may not be the one

drawned by the $opernican astronomy but it may be a video pro*ected on the

+walls+ of the cave that amplify and multiply a unique ,ody on the various mirrors

permeating the -empty- space. http55fuoridi&atrix.blogspot.it5896;59>5caverna*

platonica*ritrovata.ht&l. But this would be the description of a holographic fractal.

The Matrix Point of Light

Documents

Transcript of The Matrix Point of Light